EP0703314A1 - Method for manufacturing paper, and paper manufactured thereby - Google Patents
Method for manufacturing paper, and paper manufactured thereby Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0703314A1 EP0703314A1 EP95202472A EP95202472A EP0703314A1 EP 0703314 A1 EP0703314 A1 EP 0703314A1 EP 95202472 A EP95202472 A EP 95202472A EP 95202472 A EP95202472 A EP 95202472A EP 0703314 A1 EP0703314 A1 EP 0703314A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- starch
- paper
- cationic
- amylopectin
- potato starch
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
- D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
- D21H17/21—Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
- D21H17/24—Polysaccharides
- D21H17/28—Starch
- D21H17/29—Starch cationic
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H17/00—Non-fibrous material added to the pulp, characterised by its constitution; Paper-impregnating material characterised by its constitution
- D21H17/20—Macromolecular organic compounds
- D21H17/21—Macromolecular organic compounds of natural origin; Derivatives thereof
- D21H17/24—Polysaccharides
Definitions
- This invention relates to a method for manufacturing paper, which comprises adding a cationic amylopectin potato starch, optionally in addition to other additives, to an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers and then forming paper from this suspension in the conventional manner.
- a fibrous pulp By grinding raw materials used for paper-making, a fibrous pulp is obtained, in which the fibers are in a condition suitable for the paper formation.
- additives can be added to this fibrous pulp, such as resin glue, synthetic sizing agents, pigments and fillers (clay, titanium dioxide, talc, calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate), alum, retention agents and colloidal binders.
- the pulp mass is fed to a paper machine, where the paper formation takes place.
- the added additives serve inter alia to impart greater strength to the paper and to improve its writing and/or printing properties.
- colloidal binder in paper-making is cationic starch.
- cationic starch in paper-making is described in U.S. Patent 2,935,436.
- the use of cationic starch provides a number of advantages over the use of non-cationic starch. Mentioned as advantages are: increased retention of starch, fillers and pigments; increased paper strength (bursting strength, breaking strength, folding strength and picking resistance) and lower dosage.
- starch consist of granules in which two types of glucose polymers occur, viz. amylose (15-35% by weight on dry substance) and amylopectin (65-85% by weight on dry substance).
- Amylose consists of non-branched or little branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of 1,000 to 5,000 (depending on the kind of starch).
- Amylopectin consists of very large, highly branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of about 2,000,000.
- the commercially most important types of starch viz. maize starch, potato starch, wheat starch and tapioca starch, contain 15-30% by weight of amylose.
- starch granules consist substantially completely of amylopectin. Calculated as a percentage by weight of the dry substance, these starch granules contain more than 95% and usually more than 98% of amylopectin. The amylose content of these cereal starch granules is therefore less than 5% and usually less than 2%. It has been found that during the formation of amylopectin cereal starch granules in the grain plant, the enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of amylose molecules is absent.
- the above cereal varieties are sometimes designated as waxy cereal grains and the amylopectin starch granules isolated therefrom as waxy cereal starches.
- amylopectin content of at least 85% in paper-making.
- the required amylopectin content can be achieved by fractionating an amylose-containing starch.
- a cereal variety is used that already has a very high amylopectin content by nature, such as waxy maize starch, which contains 99-100% amylopectin.
- amylopectin potato starch is herein understood to mean the potato starch granules, isolated from potato tubers, having an amylopectin content of at least 95% by weight, calculated on the dry substance.
- amylopectin potato starch differs from those of the waxy cereal starches.
- amylopectin potato starch has a much lower content of lipids and proteins than the waxy cereal starches.
- Problems regarding odour and foam formation which may arise on account of the lipids and proteins when using waxy cereal starch products (native and modified), do not arise or do so to a much lesser extent when corresponding amylopectin potato starch products are used.
- amylopectin potato starch contains chemically bound phosphate groups. As a result, in dissolved condition amylopectin potato starch products have a specific polyelectrolyte character.
- cationic amylopectin potato starch is eminently suitable for use as colloidal binder in paper-making. With regard to drainage, retention and paper strength, cationic amylopectin potato starch gives equivalent or better results compared with corresponding cationic derivatives of other starch raw materials.
- the invention accordingly relates to a method for the manufacture of paper, which comprises adding to an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers a water-soluble or dissolved cationic amylopectin potato starch, optionally in addition to other additives, and then forming paper from this suspension in conventional manner.
- cationic starch Methods for manufacturing cationic starch have been described by D.B. Solarek: Cationic Starches, in the book of O.B. Wurzburg (Ed.): Modified Starches: Properties and Uses, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1986, pp. 113-130.
- the methods described therein can also be used for the preparation of cationic amylopectin potato starch.
- the amylopectin potato starch may be additionally modified physically, chemically and/or enzymatically.
- the invention also embraces the use of these additionally modified amylopectin potato starch products.
- the degree of substitution (DS) of the cationic amylopectin potato starch to be used according to the invention is preferably between 0.005 and 0.5 and more preferably between 0.01 and 0.2.
- the amount of cationic amylopectin potato starch which according to the invention is included in the paper pulp depends inter alia on the kind of pulp used, the working conditions used and the desired paper properties. Preferably, 0.05 to 10% by weight and more preferably 0.1 to 2% by weight of starch derivative (dry substance) calculated on the paper pulp (dry substance) is used.
- the cationic amylopectin potato starch to be used according to the invention is preferably first gelatinized in water, whereafter the resultant starch solution (optionally after dilution) is added to the pulp mass. It is also possible, however, to mix pre-gelatinized cold-soluble cationic amylopectin potato starch (as dry product or after dissolution in water) with the pulp mass.
- the cationic amylopectin potato starch can be added at any point in the paper-making process.
- the cationic starch product can therefore be added to the pulp while it is disposed in the head box, the Hollander, the hydropulper or the dusting box.
- an anionic amylopectin potato starch can also be added to the pulp. (SW 50).
- the cationic starch products were slurried in water, forming a starch suspension with 10% by weight of starch. This suspension was gelatinized with steam. The obtained starch solution was diluted with water to 1% by weight dry substance.
- the test pulp was prepared by mixing a diluted fiber suspension (containing 100% bleached birch sulphate on dry substance), with 20% by weight (calculated on dry cellulose fiber) of calcium carbonate (filler) and diluted starch solution. The amount of added cationic starch was 1.25% by weight (dry substance) calculated on the dry fiber. The consistency of the tested pulp was 0.4%.
- the test pulps were made into handsheets with a FRET sheetformer. The handsheets were dried in vacuum dryers to a moisture content of 7% by weight.
- the properties of the formed paper were determined with the following test methods: Paper test Apparatus/materials Test method Sheet weight Balance NEN 1109 Bursting strength Lorentzen & Wettre type 14-1 Burstomatic NEN 1765 Tappi T403 -om-85 Tensile strength Adamel Lhomargy type DY-20 NEN 1249 Tappi T494 -om-88 Internal Bond Schröder-Werkstoff fürmaschinen type SN.22.91.1007 Tappi T506 -wd-83 UM 584 Starch content Spectrophotometer Hexokinase method according to Boehringer The test results are recorded in Table 1.
- the cationic amylopectin starch gave equivalent or higher strength values in the paper test sheets, as compared to the other cationic starch products.
- the pulp used comprised an aqueous slurry of 70% by weight (on dry substance) of short fiber and 30% by weight of long fiber. Calcium carbonate (20% by weight on dry pulp) was added to the stock. The pulp was beaten with a consistency of 1.8% in a Pilao refiner to 27°SR. The pulp was diluted with water containing 100 ppm CaCl2 and 150 ppm NaHCO3.
- the cationic amylopectin potato starch was slurried in water (10% dry substance) and cooked with steam (25 minutes; 850 rpm).
- the starch solution was added in quantities of 0.75%, 0.875% and 1.0% by weight of dry starch calculated on dry fiber.
- the pulp was further diluted with white water.
- the obtained starch solution was diluted with water to 1% by weight dry substance.
- the pulp consisted of 80% by weight bleached birch sulphate and 20% by weight calcium carbonate as a filler (both calculated on consistency). The pulp had a consistency of 0.6%.
- the sheets were made with a FRET sheetformer, obtained from the CTP in Grenoble.
- the amount of starch added to the pulp was 0.55% and 0.65% by weight, calculated as dry substance on consistency. Before dewatering, the pulp with the added starch was diluted to 0.3%.
- the handsheets were dried in vacuum dryers to a moisture content of approximately 4% by weight.
- the obtained paper was tested according to the above-mentioned test methods, after being conditioned to a temperature of 23°C and a relative humidity of 50%.
- the results of the tests are collected in the following Tables 3 (0.55% added starch) and 4 (0.65% added starch).
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
- Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
- Pens And Brushes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates to a method for manufacturing paper, which comprises adding a cationic amylopectin potato starch, optionally in addition to other additives, to an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers and then forming paper from this suspension in the conventional manner.
- By grinding raw materials used for paper-making, a fibrous pulp is obtained, in which the fibers are in a condition suitable for the paper formation. Various additives can be added to this fibrous pulp, such as resin glue, synthetic sizing agents, pigments and fillers (clay, titanium dioxide, talc, calcium carbonate, calcium sulphate), alum, retention agents and colloidal binders. The pulp mass is fed to a paper machine, where the paper formation takes place. The added additives serve inter alia to impart greater strength to the paper and to improve its writing and/or printing properties. Typically used as colloidal binder in paper-making is cationic starch.
- The use of cationic starch in paper-making is described in U.S. Patent 2,935,436. According to this patent specification, the use of cationic starch provides a number of advantages over the use of non-cationic starch. Mentioned as advantages are: increased retention of starch, fillers and pigments; increased paper strength (bursting strength, breaking strength, folding strength and picking resistance) and lower dosage. As raw material for the manufacture of the cationic starch which according to U.S. Patent 2,935,436 is used in paper-making, different kinds of starch can be used, such as maize starch, wheat starch, potato starch, waxy maize starch, sago starch or rice starch.
- Most kinds of starch consist of granules in which two types of glucose polymers occur, viz. amylose (15-35% by weight on dry substance) and amylopectin (65-85% by weight on dry substance). Amylose consists of non-branched or little branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of 1,000 to 5,000 (depending on the kind of starch). Amylopectin consists of very large, highly branched molecules having an average degree of polymerization of about 2,000,000. The commercially most important types of starch, viz. maize starch, potato starch, wheat starch and tapioca starch, contain 15-30% by weight of amylose.
- Of some cereal types, viz. barley, maize, millet, milo, rice and sorghum, there exist natural varieties of which the starch granules consist substantially completely of amylopectin. Calculated as a percentage by weight of the dry substance, these starch granules contain more than 95% and usually more than 98% of amylopectin. The amylose content of these cereal starch granules is therefore less than 5% and usually less than 2%. It has been found that during the formation of amylopectin cereal starch granules in the grain plant, the enzyme that catalyzes the synthesis of amylose molecules is absent. The above cereal varieties are sometimes designated as waxy cereal grains and the amylopectin starch granules isolated therefrom as waxy cereal starches.
- From EP-A-0,353,212 it is known to use cationic starch having an amylopectin content of at least 85% in paper-making. The required amylopectin content can be achieved by fractionating an amylose-containing starch. Preferably, however, a cereal variety is used that already has a very high amylopectin content by nature, such as waxy maize starch, which contains 99-100% amylopectin.
- In contrast with the situation regarding various grains, there are no known natural potato varieties of which the starch granules consist substantially exclusively of amylopectin. The potato starch granules isolated from potato tubers typically contain approximately 20% amylose and 80% amylopectin (% by weight on dry substance). The past decade, however, saw the successful breeding, through genetic modification, of potato plants which, in the potato tubers, form starch granules that comprise more than 95% by weight (on the dry substance) of amylopectin.
- In the formation of starch granules in the plant, various enzymes are catalytically active. Of these enzymes, the granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS) is involved in the formation of amylose. The synthesis of the GBSS enzyme is dependent on the activity of genes that code for the GBSS enzyme. Elimination or inhibition of the expression of these specific genes leads to the synthesis of the GBSS enzyme being prevented or limited. The elimination of these genes can be realized by genetic modification of potato plant material. An example of this is the amylose-free mutant of the potato (amf) the starch of which contains substantially exclusively amylopectin as a result of a recessive mutation in the GBSS gene. This mutation technique is described inter alia in the following two journal articles:
- J.H.M. Hovenkamp-Hermelink et al.
Isolation of amylose-free starch mutant of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
Theor. Appl. Genet. (1987), 75: 217-221. - E. Jacobsen et al.
Introduction of an amylose-free (amf) mutant into breeding of cultivated potato, Solanum tuberosum L.
Euphytica (1991), 53, 247-253. - Elimination or inhibition of the expression of the GBSS gene in the potato is also possible by the use of so-called antisense inhibition. This genetic modification of the potato is described in the Canadian patent specification 2,061,443; the International patent specification WO 92/11376 and in the following journal article:
- R.G.F. Visser et al.
Inhibition of the expression of the gene for granule-bound starch synthase in potato by antisense constructs.
Mol. Gen. Genet. (1991), 225: 289-296. - By the use of genetic modification it has been found to be possible to breed and grow potatoes whose starch granules contain little or substantially no amylose.
- The term amylopectin potato starch is herein understood to mean the potato starch granules, isolated from potato tubers, having an amylopectin content of at least 95% by weight, calculated on the dry substance.
- With regard to production possibilities and properties, there are significant differences between amylopectin potato starch on the one hand and the waxy cereal starches on the other. This also holds, in particular, for waxy maize starch, which is commercially by far the most important waxy cereal starch. The cultivation of waxy maize, which is suitable for the production of waxy maize starch, is commercially unfeasible in countries with a cold or temperate climate, such as the Netherlands, Belgium, England, Germany, Poland, Sweden and Denmark. For the growth of potatoes, on the other hand, the climate in these countries is quite suitable.
- The composition and properties of amylopectin potato starch differ from those of the waxy cereal starches. For instance, amylopectin potato starch has a much lower content of lipids and proteins than the waxy cereal starches. Problems regarding odour and foam formation, which may arise on account of the lipids and proteins when using waxy cereal starch products (native and modified), do not arise or do so to a much lesser extent when corresponding amylopectin potato starch products are used. Unlike the waxy cereal starches, amylopectin potato starch contains chemically bound phosphate groups. As a result, in dissolved condition amylopectin potato starch products have a specific polyelectrolyte character.
- It has been found that cationic amylopectin potato starch is eminently suitable for use as colloidal binder in paper-making. With regard to drainage, retention and paper strength, cationic amylopectin potato starch gives equivalent or better results compared with corresponding cationic derivatives of other starch raw materials.
- The invention accordingly relates to a method for the manufacture of paper, which comprises adding to an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers a water-soluble or dissolved cationic amylopectin potato starch, optionally in addition to other additives, and then forming paper from this suspension in conventional manner.
- Methods for manufacturing cationic starch have been described by D.B. Solarek: Cationic Starches, in the book of O.B. Wurzburg (Ed.): Modified Starches: Properties and Uses, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1986, pp. 113-130. The methods described therein can also be used for the preparation of cationic amylopectin potato starch. According to the invention, it is preferred to use cationic amylopectin potato starch products that contain electropositively charged quaternary ammonium groups. Before, after or during the cationization reaction the amylopectin potato starch may be additionally modified physically, chemically and/or enzymatically. The invention also embraces the use of these additionally modified amylopectin potato starch products. The degree of substitution (DS) of the cationic amylopectin potato starch to be used according to the invention is preferably between 0.005 and 0.5 and more preferably between 0.01 and 0.2.
- The amount of cationic amylopectin potato starch which according to the invention is included in the paper pulp depends inter alia on the kind of pulp used, the working conditions used and the desired paper properties. Preferably, 0.05 to 10% by weight and more preferably 0.1 to 2% by weight of starch derivative (dry substance) calculated on the paper pulp (dry substance) is used.
- The cationic amylopectin potato starch to be used according to the invention is preferably first gelatinized in water, whereafter the resultant starch solution (optionally after dilution) is added to the pulp mass. It is also possible, however, to mix pre-gelatinized cold-soluble cationic amylopectin potato starch (as dry product or after dissolution in water) with the pulp mass.
- The cationic amylopectin potato starch can be added at any point in the paper-making process. The cationic starch product can therefore be added to the pulp while it is disposed in the head box, the Hollander, the hydropulper or the dusting box. If desired, in addition to the cationic amylopectin potato starch, an anionic amylopectin potato starch can also be added to the pulp. (SW 50).
- In this example the following four cationic starch products, containing quaternary ammonium substituents (Degree of Substitution 0.035), were used as wet-end additive for the manufacture of paper:
- A. Cationic maize starch
- B. Cationic potato starch
(containing about 20% by weight of amylose on dry substance) - C. Cationic waxy maize starch
- D. Cationic amylopectin potato starch
(according to the invention). - The cationic starch products were slurried in water, forming a starch suspension with 10% by weight of starch. This suspension was gelatinized with steam. The obtained starch solution was diluted with water to 1% by weight dry substance.
- The test pulp was prepared by mixing a diluted fiber suspension (containing 100% bleached birch sulphate on dry substance), with 20% by weight (calculated on dry cellulose fiber) of calcium carbonate (filler) and diluted starch solution. The amount of added cationic starch was 1.25% by weight (dry substance) calculated on the dry fiber. The consistency of the tested pulp was 0.4%. The test pulps were made into handsheets with a FRET sheetformer. The handsheets were dried in vacuum dryers to a moisture content of 7% by weight.
- The properties of the formed paper were determined with the following test methods:
The test results are recorded in Table 1.Paper test Apparatus/materials Test method Sheet weight Balance NEN 1109 Bursting strength Lorentzen & Wettre type 14-1 Burstomatic NEN 1765 Tappi T403 -om-85 Tensile strength Adamel Lhomargy type DY-20 NEN 1249 Tappi T494 -om-88 Internal Bond Schröder-Werkstoff Prüfmaschinen type SN.22.91.1007 Tappi T506 -wd-83 UM 584 Starch content Spectrophotometer Hexokinase method according to Boehringer TABLE 1 Cationic starch Starch content (%) Ash content (%) Sheet weight (g/m²) Bursting strength (kPa) Tensile strength (kN/m) Internal Bond (J/m²) Maize starch 1.0 16.9 98.7 271 7.3 740 Potato starch 0.9 15.1 98.9 305 6.9 760 Waxy maize starch 1.0 16.4 98.6 306 6.8 820 Amylopectin potato starch 1.0 16.4 97.7 310 7.2 830 Control < 0.1 5.9 85.8 210 6.3 645 - As will be noted from the foregoing results, the cationic amylopectin starch gave equivalent or higher strength values in the paper test sheets, as compared to the other cationic starch products.
- In this example various amounts of cationic amylopectin potato starch products (containing quaternary ammonium substituents with a DS of 0.035) were used as wet-end additive for papermaking. This series of tests was carried out in a pilot paper machine located at the Hercules European Research Center in Barneveld.
- The pulp used comprised an aqueous slurry of 70% by weight (on dry substance) of short fiber and 30% by weight of long fiber. Calcium carbonate (20% by weight on dry pulp) was added to the stock. The pulp was beaten with a consistency of 1.8% in a Pilao refiner to 27°SR. The pulp was diluted with water containing 100 ppm CaCl₂ and 150 ppm NaHCO₃.
- The cationic amylopectin potato starch was slurried in water (10% dry substance) and cooked with steam (25 minutes; 850 rpm). The starch solution was added in quantities of 0.75%, 0.875% and 1.0% by weight of dry starch calculated on dry fiber. The pulp was further diluted with white water.
- The pulp was made into paper in the pilot paper machine at a speed of 3.0 m/min. After the pressing section of the machine the sheet had a dry substance content of about 40%. The sheet was dried on drying cylinders to a moisture content of 4%. The paper was tested and the results of these tests are recorded in Table 2. These results show the higher strength values in the paper prepared with increasing amounts of cationic amylopectin potato starch.
TABLE 2 Cationic amylopectin potato starch; % by wt. of dry product on dry fiber Starch content (%) Ash content (%) Sheet weight (g/m²) Bursting strength (kPa) Tensile strength (kN/m) Internal Bond (J/m²) 0.75 0.704 16.64 78.96 217.2 5.338 5.272 0.875 0.757 16.64 78.59 229.7 5.498 5.274 1.00 0.836 16.04 80.05 234.9 5.632 5.315 - In this example the following cationic starches, all containing quaternary ammonium substituents with a degree of substitution of 0.035, were tested as a wet-end additive for the production of paper:
- A. Cationic potato starch (containing approximately 20% by weight amylose on dry substance)
- B. Cationic waxy maize starch
- C. Cationic amylopectin potato starch
(according to the invention). - A slurry of each of the cationic starches, with 10% by weight starch, was gelatinized with steam. The obtained starch solution was diluted with water to 1% by weight dry substance. The pulp consisted of 80% by weight bleached birch sulphate and 20% by weight calcium carbonate as a filler (both calculated on consistency). The pulp had a consistency of 0.6%. The sheets were made with a FRET sheetformer, obtained from the CTP in Grenoble. The amount of starch added to the pulp was 0.55% and 0.65% by weight, calculated as dry substance on consistency. Before dewatering, the pulp with the added starch was diluted to 0.3%. The handsheets were dried in vacuum dryers to a moisture content of approximately 4% by weight.
- The obtained paper was tested according to the above-mentioned test methods, after being conditioned to a temperature of 23°C and a relative humidity of 50%. The results of the tests are collected in the following Tables 3 (0.55% added starch) and 4 (0.65% added starch).
TABLE 3 Cationic starch Starch dosage (%) Sheet weight (g/m²) Filler content (%) Bursting strength (kPa) Tensile strength (kN/m) Internal Bond (J/m²) Potato starch 0.55 75.08 9.99 182.4 3.40 466.0 Waxy maize starch 0.55 74.79 9.34 178.1 3.446 480.1 Amylopectin potato starch 0.55 75.13 10.18 182.2 3.503 495.5 TABLE 4 Cationic starch Starch dosage (%) Sheet weight (g/m²) Filler content (%) Bursting strength (kPa) Tensile strength (kN/m) Internal Bond (J/m²) Potato starch 0.65 75.82 9.40 189 3.619 477 Waxy maize starch 0.65 75.52 9.10 180 3.678 494 Amylopectin potato starch 0.65 75.74 9.66 206 3.697 512 - It is clear that the addition of cationic amylopectin potato starch results in higher filler retentions than the addition of one of the other cationic starches. With other things being equal, a higher filler content will cause a decrease of the strength of the paper. However, the results show that with cationic amylopectin potato starch the strength properties of the paper sheets are equivalent, and with regard to the internal strength even higher, than obtained with the other cationic starches. It can be concluded that with cationic amylopectin potato starch higher filler retentions and equivalent or higher strength values of the paper are obtained than with other cationic starches.
Claims (4)
- A method for manufacturing paper, which comprises adding to an aqueous suspension of cellulose fibers a water-soluble or dissolved cationic starch, optionally in addition to other additives, and then forming paper from this suspension in the conventional manner, characterized in that as cationic starch a cationic amylopectin potato starch is used.
- A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the amylopectin potato starch is isolated from potatoes originating from potato plants obtained by mutation.
- A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the amylopectin potato starch is isolated from potatoes originating from potato plants obtained by antisense inhibition.
- Paper manufactured utilizing the method according to claims 1-3.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL9401487A NL9401487A (en) | 1994-09-13 | 1994-09-13 | Method of manufacturing paper, as well as paper thus produced. |
| NL9401487 | 1994-09-13 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP0703314A1 true EP0703314A1 (en) | 1996-03-27 |
| EP0703314B1 EP0703314B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 |
Family
ID=19864648
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP95202472A Revoked EP0703314B1 (en) | 1994-09-13 | 1995-09-12 | Method for manufacturing paper, and paper manufactured thereby |
Country Status (7)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0703314B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE180296T1 (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69509722T2 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK0703314T3 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2133659T3 (en) |
| FI (1) | FI954282A7 (en) |
| NL (1) | NL9401487A (en) |
Cited By (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1997004168A1 (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 1997-02-06 | Sveriges Stärkelseproducenter, Förening UPA | Retention agent |
| EP0816299A1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-07 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Additive for building materials on the basis of amylopectin |
| EP0822287A1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 1998-02-04 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Fiber treatment composition |
| EP0833007A1 (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-04-01 | National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation | Method of papermaking using modified cationic starch |
| EP0824161A3 (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 1998-04-08 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Starch and starch derivatives for the paper industry |
| WO2000011192A3 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-06-02 | Pioneer Hi Bred Int | Plant glutamine: fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase nucleic acids |
| EP1865105A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-12 | Coöperatie Avebe U.A. | Process for making paper using cationic amylopectin starch |
| US7553508B1 (en) | 1999-03-15 | 2009-06-30 | Cooperative Verkoop-En Productievereniging Van Aardappelmeel En Derivaten Avebe B.A. | Amylopectin potato flakes or granules and their use in snack foods |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0139597A1 (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1985-05-02 | Roquette Frˬres | Cationic additive for paper production |
| WO1986000100A1 (en) * | 1984-06-07 | 1986-01-03 | Eka Ab | Papermaking process |
| EP0353212A1 (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1990-01-31 | W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | A sizing composition, a method for the preparation thereof and a method of use |
-
1994
- 1994-09-13 NL NL9401487A patent/NL9401487A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1995
- 1995-09-12 DK DK95202472T patent/DK0703314T3/en active
- 1995-09-12 ES ES95202472T patent/ES2133659T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-09-12 EP EP95202472A patent/EP0703314B1/en not_active Revoked
- 1995-09-12 AT AT95202472T patent/ATE180296T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-09-12 DE DE69509722T patent/DE69509722T2/en not_active Revoked
- 1995-09-13 FI FI954282A patent/FI954282A7/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP0139597A1 (en) * | 1983-10-27 | 1985-05-02 | Roquette Frˬres | Cationic additive for paper production |
| WO1986000100A1 (en) * | 1984-06-07 | 1986-01-03 | Eka Ab | Papermaking process |
| EP0353212A1 (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1990-01-31 | W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. | A sizing composition, a method for the preparation thereof and a method of use |
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1997004168A1 (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 1997-02-06 | Sveriges Stärkelseproducenter, Förening UPA | Retention agent |
| EP0816299A1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1998-01-07 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Additive for building materials on the basis of amylopectin |
| EP0822287A1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 1998-02-04 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Fiber treatment composition |
| AT408996B (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 2002-04-25 | Tulln Zuckerforschung Gmbh | FIBER TREATMENT AGENT |
| EP0824161A3 (en) * | 1996-08-12 | 1998-04-08 | Südzucker Aktiengesellschaft Mannheim/Ochsenfurt | Starch and starch derivatives for the paper industry |
| EP0833007A1 (en) * | 1996-09-27 | 1998-04-01 | National Starch and Chemical Investment Holding Corporation | Method of papermaking using modified cationic starch |
| WO2000011192A3 (en) * | 1998-08-25 | 2000-06-02 | Pioneer Hi Bred Int | Plant glutamine: fructose-6-phosphate amidotransferase nucleic acids |
| US7553508B1 (en) | 1999-03-15 | 2009-06-30 | Cooperative Verkoop-En Productievereniging Van Aardappelmeel En Derivaten Avebe B.A. | Amylopectin potato flakes or granules and their use in snack foods |
| EP1865105A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-12 | Coöperatie Avebe U.A. | Process for making paper using cationic amylopectin starch |
| WO2007142528A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | Coöperatie Avebe U.A. | Process for making paper using cationic amylopectin starch |
| AU2007256038B2 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2010-06-24 | Cooperatie Avebe U.A. | Process for making paper using cationic amylopectin starch |
| EA016520B1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2012-05-30 | Коперати Авебе У.А. | Use of cationic amylopectin starch in process for making paper for reducing phenomenon of vessel picking |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| FI954282L (en) | 1996-03-14 |
| EP0703314B1 (en) | 1999-05-19 |
| DK0703314T3 (en) | 1999-11-08 |
| ES2133659T3 (en) | 1999-09-16 |
| DE69509722T2 (en) | 2000-01-13 |
| ATE180296T1 (en) | 1999-06-15 |
| FI954282A7 (en) | 1996-03-14 |
| NL9401487A (en) | 1996-04-01 |
| DE69509722D1 (en) | 1999-06-24 |
| FI954282A0 (en) | 1995-09-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4278573A (en) | Preparation of cationic starch graft copolymers from starch, N,N-methylenebisacrylamide, and polyamines | |
| US6843888B2 (en) | Starches for use in papermaking | |
| CA1284639C (en) | Amphoteric starches and process for their preparation | |
| US6767430B1 (en) | Process for making paper | |
| AU685700B2 (en) | Paper containing thermally-inhibited starches | |
| US6777548B1 (en) | Oxidation of starch | |
| US6365002B1 (en) | Amphoteric starches used in papermaking | |
| EP0703314B1 (en) | Method for manufacturing paper, and paper manufactured thereby | |
| EP1086274B1 (en) | A process for making paper | |
| AU2007256038B2 (en) | Process for making paper using cationic amylopectin starch | |
| NO152606B (en) | ANALOGUE PROCEDURE FOR THE PREPARATION OF NEW PHARMACEUTICAL USE 2-IMIDAZOLIN-1-YL URINE AND AMIDO COMPOUNDS | |
| US4964953A (en) | Amphoteric starches and process for their preparation | |
| US20020104634A1 (en) | Starch compositions and the use thereof in the wet-end of paper preparation | |
| US4330365A (en) | Paper containing cationic starch graft copolymers from starch, N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide, and polyamines | |
| EP0737777B1 (en) | Method for surface sizing paper, and paper thus obtained |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960320 |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19971117 |
|
| GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
| GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
| GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
| GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990519 |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 180296 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19990615 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69509722 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19990624 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG |
|
| ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
| ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990912 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19990912 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2133659 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 19990729 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
| PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
| PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
| PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
| PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20000331 |
|
| 26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Effective date: 20000218 Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH Effective date: 20000214 |
|
| NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH |
|
| PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PLBF | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OBSO |
|
| PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
| PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
| R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH * 20000218 SVERIGES STA Effective date: 20000214 |
|
| NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH |
|
| PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
| PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
| R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH * 20000218 SVERIGES STA Effective date: 20000214 |
|
| PLAW | Interlocutory decision in opposition |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IDOP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
| NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH |
|
| APAC | Appeal dossier modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO |
|
| APAE | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS REFNO |
|
| APAC | Appeal dossier modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS NOAPO |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20040928 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20041015 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20041022 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20041124 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
| PLBQ | Unpublished change to opponent data |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO |
|
| R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Effective date: 20000218 Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH Effective date: 20000214 |
|
| NLR1 | Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo |
Opponent name: SVERIGES STAERKELSEPRODUCENTER Opponent name: ZUCKERFORSCHUNG TULLN GMBH |
|
| APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20050825 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20050907 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20050909 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20050912 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20050915 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20050916 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| APAY | Date of receipt of notice of appeal deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA2O |
|
| APBA | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA3O |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20050922 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
| RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
| APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| 27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20050615 |
|
| GBPR | Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state |
Free format text: 20050615 |
|
| NLR2 | Nl: decision of opposition |
Effective date: 20050615 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: ECNC |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20060930 Year of fee payment: 12 |