WO1992002561A1

WO1992002561A1 - Polymerisation of vinyl monomers with a new catalytic system

Info

Publication number: WO1992002561A1
Application number: PCT/US1991/005331
Authority: WO
Inventors: Joe Douglas Druliner; Michael Fryd
Original assignee: EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Current assignee: EIDP Inc
Priority date: 1990-08-06
Filing date: 1991-08-01
Publication date: 1992-02-20
Anticipated expiration: 1993-02-06
Also published as: DE69129629T2; DE69129629D1; JPH05509126A; EP0542877B1; US5059657A; EP0542877A1; JP3030084B2; ES2117012T3; CA2088782A1

Abstract

A process for the polymerization of selected acrylic and maleimide monomers by contacting the monomers with a diazotate, cyanate or hyponitrite, and N-chlorosuccinimide, N-bromosuccinimide or a diazonium salt. The polymers produced can themselves initiate further polymerization. Block copolymers can be produced.

Description

Polymerization of vinyl monomers with a new catalytic

system

FIELD OF INVENTION

This invention concerns a process for the

polymerization of selected vinyl monomers, by contacting the vinyl monomer with an aryl diazotate, a cyanate, or a hyponitrite, and an aryl diazonium salt or an N-halosuccinimide. The polymers produced are useful for initiating further polymerization. Useful block

polymers can also be produced.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

H. K. Hall Jr. and M. A. Howey, Polym. Bull., vol. 12, pg. 427-431 (1984) report that aryl diazonium salts polymerize p-methoxystyrene in nitrobenzene. No mention is made of cyanates or hyponitrites, or the ability to restart the polymerization.

H. Warson in two papers (Die Makromol. Chem., vol. 105, pg. 228-250 (1967)) reports that aryl diazonium compounds with either bisulfite or hypophosphorous acid will polymerize acrylonitrile.

P. R. Singh, et al., Tet. Lett., vol. 23, pg. 5191-5194 (1982) report the aryl diazonium ions react with nitrite ions to give free radical type intermediates. No mention is made of polymerization.

C. Walling, Free Radical in Solution, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1957, pp. 518-519 and W. E.

Bachmann and R. A. Hoffman, in R. Adams, Ed., Organic Reactions, Vol. II, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1944, pp. 226-230 speculate that aryldiazohydroxides, which are said to be in equilibrium with their sodium salts when in contact with sodium hydroxide, decompose readily at room temperature to give free radicals.

In all of the above references, there is no mention of the use of diazotate, cyanate, hyponitrite "coagents", the use of these compounds for acrylic polymerizations, or the possibility of an

"interruptible" polymerization.

U.S. Patent 4,581,429, describes the use of a compound of the formula (here modified) R^a ₂N-O-X, wherein R^a is a hindered alkyl group and X is a group containing at least one carbon atom. Although this compound can initiate acrylic polymerization, and the polymerization is interruptible, no mention is made of diazonium salts, diazotates, cyanates or hyponitrites.

U.S. Patent 4,761,360 describes a light sensitive material containing a silver halide, a reducing agent, a polymerizable compound (vinyl monomer) and a silver diazotate. This mixture is reported to be stable

(indeed it is said to be an advantage) until the material is exposed to light, and then heated, at which time the vinyl monomer is polymerized. In the instant process a silver halide is not present.

It is the object of this invention to provide a method for the polymerization of acrylic and maleimide monomers, by contacting the monomers with an aryl diazotate, a cyanate, or a hyponitrite, and an aryl diazonium salt or an N-halosuccinimide. This process, which may be carried out in a variety of ways, such as neat, in solution, or as an emulsion, may be restarted after the polymerization has stopped. This surprising property may be utilized to prepare block copolymers.

SUMMARY OF THE TWENTTON

This invention concerns a process for the

polymerization of vinyl monomers, comprising,

contacting:

(a) an acrylic monomer or N-phenylmaleimide;

(b) a diazotate of the formu a Ar¹-N=N-O- M+, or a cyanate of the formula MOCN, or a hyponitrite of the formula M₂N₂O₂, wherein Ar¹ is aryl or substituted aryl, and M is a metal or a tetrahydrocarbylammonium ion; and (c) N-chlorosuccinimide, N-bromosuccinimide, or a diazonium salt of the formula Ar²N2⁺ X-, wherein Ar² is aryl or substituted aryl, and X is an anion.

DETAILS OF THE TNVENTION

Among the vinyl monomers useful in the instant process are acrylic monomers, particularly acrylic acids and esters. By the term acrylic is meant a compound of the formula

wherein the open valence is attached to a hydrocarbyloxy or substituted hydrocarbyloxy group to form an ester, or a hydroxy group to form an acid. The group R³ is an alkyl group containing up to 4 carbon atoms or hydrogen. Preferred R³ groups are methyl and hydrogen. Preferred acrylic monomers are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl

methacrylate, phenyl acrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, and 2-hydroxyethyl

methacrylate.

By the term "substituted hydrocarbyl (oxy)" herein is meant a hydrocarbyl (oxy) group that contains one or more substituents that do not interfere with the

polymerization process. The substituents may be between hydrocarbyl segments, such as ether and amino. Examples of other suitable substituents include, but are not limited to fluoro, keto (oxo), ester, amido, and silyl.

The cyanates, diazotates, and hyponitrites use'' herein are metal and tetrahydrocarbylammonium salts. By the term "substituted" aryl herein is meant an aryl group that contains one or more substituents that do not interfere with the polymerization process. The

substituents may be between hydrocarbyl segments, such as ether and amino. Examples of other suitable

substituents include, but are not limited to fluoro, keto (oxo), ester, amide, silyl, alkyl, and cycloalkyl. It is preferred if the aryl group, Ar¹, is substituted with one or more electron withdrawing substituents. An electron withdrawing substituent has a so-called Hammett Constant of about 0.2 or more (for a listing of Hammett Constants, see H. Jaffe, Chem. Rev., vol. 53, pg. 222-223 (1953), which is hereby included by reference).

Especially preferred substituents are nitro and nitrile. Especially preferred Ar¹ groups are p-nitrophenyl, and p-cyanophenyl. Preferred metal ions for the cyanate, diazotate, and hyponitrite salts are alkali metals and tetraalkylammonium and especially preferred are sodium, potassium and tetraalkylammonium.

The diazonium salts used in the instant process have the formula Ar²N₂ ⁺ X-, and such diazonium compounds are well known- to those skilled in the art. It is preferred if the group Ar² is derived from benzene, and preferred Ar² groups are phenyl, and p-nitrophenyl.

Preferred anions X are chloride, hexafluorophosphate, hexafluoroantimonate, and tetrafluoroborate.

The process may be run neat (no additional

compounds added) or in a solvent, emulsion or

suspension. No matter how the reaction is run, it is important that at least some of each ingredient be present in a single phase, at least to start the

polymerization. For example, when the process is run neat, ingredients (b) and (c) , which are salts, may not be soluble in the neat reaction medium, which normally is mostly vinyl monomer. Thus the salts may be the term "substituted" aryl herein is meant an aryl group that contains one or more substituents that do not interfere with the polymerization process. The

The diazonium salts used in the instant process have the formula Ar²N₂ ⁺ X-, and such diazonium compounds are well known to those skilled in the art. It is preferred if the group Ar² is derived from benzene, and preferred Ar² groups are phenyl, and p-nitrophenyl.

The process may be run neat (no additional

compounds added) or in a solvent, emulsion or

polymerization. For example, when the process is run neat, ingredients (b) and (c), which are salts, may not be soluble in the neat reaction medium, which normally is mostly vinyl monomer. Thus the salts may be copolymers are produced by sequential addition of monomers. That is, a block is started with one or more monomers. When those monomers are used up

(polymerized), a second monomer (s) is added to make the next block. Block polymers are a preferred product of this process.

The polymers made by the process of this invention, even after isolation, as by stripping off solvent under vacuum, or precipitation from a nonsolvent, retain the unusual property of being able to initiate

polymerization (herein termed a "secondary

polymerization") of one of the selected monomers useful in the instant process. Temperatures needed for this secondary polymerization are about 80°C to about 120°C, preferably about 90°C to about 100°C. For the secondary polymerization no other ingredients other than the vinyl monomer and polymer are necessary, but it is convenient to mix the vinyl monomer and polymer in solution, so it is preferred to carry out the secondary polymerization in a solvent. If the polymer is soluble in the vinyl monomer, the monomer may act as the solvent, in other words, in this case the secondary polymerization is done neat . Block copolymers may also be made by secondary polymerization. It is preferred if oxygen is excluded from the secondary polymerization.

The polymers produced by the instant process are useful as molding resins, in coatings, and in films.

They may be formed into useful articles by processes well known to those skilled in the art.

In the Examples that follow, the following

abbreviations are used:

BA - n-butyl acrylate

EHMA - 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate

HEMA - 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate

MA - methyl acrylate MAA - methacrylic acid

MMA - methyl methacrylate

Mn - number average molecular weight

Mw - weight average molecular weight

P - indicates the polymer of the monomer acronym that follows

Ph or - phenyl or phenylene

THF - tetrahydrofuran

Experimental Procedure for

Examples 1-26 (Table I)

EXAMPLE 1

To a 6 cc glass vial, containing a Teflon^®-coated stir bar, in a N₂-filled dry box, was charged: 0.1 m mole øN₂BF₄, 0.5 cc N₂-purged acetone, and 9.4 m mole N₂-purged MMA. Then 0.05 mmole Na₂N₂O₂ was added, the vial was sealed with a Teflon^®-coated silicon disk, and stirring was started. After stirring for 24 hours, the contents of the vial were combined with 5 cc CH₂CI₂ which was then poured into 20 cc of 0º methanol. The precipitated polymer was air dried and a sample was analyzed by GPC, giving Mw = 32,400 and MN = 16,400.

Examples 1 through 26 were all carried out

essentially identically, except for minor differences noted at the bottom of Table I. Most reactions involved syringe needle sparging with N₂ to remove air. The final polymers were analyzed by GPC on total product samples obtained by simply removing volatiles by vacuum (0.1 mm Hg) , except for Examples 1 and 4, which involved precipitating the polymers from CH₂CI₂ with methanol.

TABLE I (continued)

Ex. Time, hr. % Conv. Mn Mw Reaction Vessel

1 24 - 16,400 32,400 a

2 24 - 12,000 17,300 a

3 16 - 33,500 128,000 a

4 16 solid a

5 16 - 17,500 34,600 a

2

6 16 - 5,920 22,600

7 0.5 10^W 1,090 3,000 a

8 16 solid a

5 min.

9 0. 5

4 - 11 , 400 21,100 a

10 - 11 , 300 20,300 b

11 65 solid c

10 min.

12 15 min.

165 min. -100^N 6,350 34,000 c

13 20 25^N c

14 68 78^N c

15 4.7 (days) 29^N 1,930 16,400 c

16 2.3 64^N c

EXAMPLE 27

To a 50 cc three-necked glass round-bottomed flask, equipped with a thermometer, Teflon^®-coated stir bar, water-cooled condenser, and N₂ inlet and outlet tubes, was charged: 1.98 mmoles øN₂BF₄, 0.78 mmoles Na₂N₂O₂, and 214 mmoles MMA. The mixture was stirred and purged with N₂ using a needle to admit N₂ through the liquid for ten minutes. The needle was then changed to the vapor space. At t=0, 10 cc of N₂-purged methanol was injected, the pot was heated by means of an electric heating mantle to a liquid temperature of 40°C, and samples of about 1 .5 cc each were withdrawn by syringe at the times shown below. Each sample was weighed in a 25 cc filter flask, vacuum stripped to remove volatiles (0.1 mm Hg) and re-weighed. GPC analyses were done for M_w and M_n, and % conversion was calculated for each sample.

Reaction time

at 40° (min.) % Conv. Mn Mw

45 17.6 2,310 6,770

90 24.0 3,350 10,900

135 31.6 4,710 12,800

180 43.1 5,310 14,500

225 41.5 4,230 15,500

EXAMPLE 28

The procedure and techniques described for Example 27 were repeated, except that a 30 cc bottle capped with a metal cap and a Teflon^®-coated silicone disk, was used for the reaction. Rubber tubing, connected to N₂ inlet and outlet needles, was used to purge the bottle of air, and a Teflon^®-coated stir bar was used for agitation. The empty bottle was charged with: 0.50 m moles øN₂BF₄, 0.52 m moles NaOCN, and 50 m moles MMA. The bottle was then capped and N₂-purged, then placed in a 35° oil bath. At t=0, 1 cc of N₂-purged methanol was injected and samples were withdrawn with time.

Reaction time

at 35° (hr) % Conv. M_n M_w

1 21.7 9,230 83,800

2 34.7 9,900 126,000

3 44.4 17,400 200,000

EXAMPLE 29

The procedure described for Example 28, including the use of a 30 cc glass bottle, was repeated as follows, at 25°. The 30 cc bottle was charged with: 0.40 m mole ON₂BF₄ and 40 m mole MMA. The bottle was sealed, N₂ purged, and at t=0, injected with a N₂-purged solution of 0.40 m mole O₂NøN=NONa dissolved in 0.8 cc H₂O. Samples were removed by syringe as follows. Reaction time

at 25° ( min.) % Conv. M_n M_w

30 10.5 4,590 11,400

60 18.3 5,880 15,600

90 23.6 7,320 19,000 120 33.2 7,920 21,600

150 31.6 8,180 22,300

180 32.2 9,040 24,600

EXAMPLE 30

PMMA Preparation To a 25 cc filter flask, with a Teflon®-coated stir bar, was charged 0.69 m mole

O₂NøN₂BF₄, 0.24 m mole Na₂N₂O₂, and 57.8 m mole MMA. The flask was sealed with a rubber septum and a rubber dropper bulb and was purged with N₂ using inlet and outlet needles. At t=0, 2 cc of N₂-purged methanol was injected, the flask was heated at 30° and stirred for three hours. The volatiles were then removed by vacuum (0.1 mm Hg) stripping for 15 minutes at 25°. The polymeric product (PMMA) weighed 1.72 g. A 0.52 g portion of the PMMA was placed in a 30 cc crimp cap vial with a stir bar, was sealed with a Teflon®-coated silicone disk, and was purged with N₂. Next, 5 cc of N₂-purged BA and 2 cc of N₂-purged acetone were injected and the resulting solution was stirred at 30° for 3 hours. A 6.64 g portion of the resulting polymer was stripped of volatiles to give 1.03 g of polymer

(PMMA/PBA) . The samples of PMMA and PMMA/PBA were characterized by ¹H NMR, GPC, and DSC (differential scanning calorimetry).

1H NMR

PMMA Comparison of integrals for peaks at 3.9 ppm

showed that the isolated PMMA contained < 7% unreacted MMA.

PMMA/PBA Comparison of integrals at 4.0 ppm

showed that the ratio of PBA/PMMA was 1.1. GPC M_n Mw

PMMA 4,540 20,900 PMMA/PBA 9,880 236,000 DSC A 0.76 g sample of PMMA/PBA was dissolved in 10 cc THF, filtered reduced in volume to about 5 cc by vacuum (0.1 mm Hg) , then poured into rapidly stirred 30 cc of methanol. The precipitated polymer was collected by filtration and dried at 65° for 16 hours at 15-20 inches of H₂O pressure. The final polymer (PMMA/PBA) weighed 0.63 g. A DSC analysis showed two distinct regions of phase transition; one at -37° (PBA) and one at +122° (PMMA) . The two transitions show that the polymer was not a random copolymer, which would be expected to exhibit a single transition temperature midway between -37° and +122°. EXAMPLE 31

The procedure described for Example 30 was

repeated, with the same periods of heating at 30°, except for using the following amounts of reagents:

0.47 m mole ON₂BF₄, 0.24 m mole Na₂N₂O₂, and 52.9 m mole MMA. A 2 cc portion of N₂-purged methanol was used in the preparation of PMMA. A 0.42 g sample of PMMA was heated at 30° and stirred with 5 cc of N₂-purged BA and 2 cc of N₂-purged acetone for 3 hours to prepare the final PMMA/PBA. The PMMA/PBA polymer was characterized by ¹H NMR and GPC. The comparison of proton integrals for MMA (3.9 ppm) and PMMA (3.6 ppm) in the PMMA polymer showed a MMA/PMMA ratio of about 8/92. The PBA/PMMA ratio in the final polymer was about 4/1. The GPC analyses of the polymers gave the following: M_n M_w

PMMA 2, 890 9, 220

PMMA/PBA 3, 900 16, 300 EXAMPLE 32

To a 30 cc glass bottle was charged: 0.40 m mole ON₂BF₄, 0.40 m mole Na₂N₂O₂, and 20 m mole EHMA and a Teflon^®-coated stir bar. The bottle was sealed using a Teflon^®-coated silicone disk and the contents were

N2-purged using needles connected to a N² source and an oil bubbler. At t=0, 0.8 cc of N₂-purged methanol was injected by syringe. At t=2 hours, about 1 cc of reaction liquid was removed by syringe for analysis by 1H NMR and GPC. At t=2 hours a N₂-purged solution of 17.8 m mole MAA in 5 cc of THF was injected and the resulting solution was stirred for an additional 20 hours.

The final polymer was purified by dissolving the reaction product in about 5 cc of THF, followed by pouring into 50 cc methanol. A milky suspension resulted, even on cooling to 0°, so the solvent was allowed to evaporate, by standing in a fume hood for about 16 hours. A 3.54 g sample of tan solid resulted. The tan solid was dissolved in about 5 cc of THF, followed by pouring into 50 cc of heptane. A

precipitate was collected by filtration, was air dried, and weighed 2.12 g. The PEHMA and PEHMA//PEHMA/PMAA polymers were analyzed by ¹H NMR, GPC, and acid

titration for PMAA content. Comparison of the ¹H NMR integral for EHMA, 4.0 ppm

with that for

showed a EHMA/PEHMA ratio of 5/3, or 37% conversion of EHMA to PEHMA, in the 2 hour sample. A ¹H NMR spectrum of the final PEHMA//PEHMA/PMAA polymer showed the presence of only a trace of residual EHMA.

GPC M_n M_w

PMMA 3, 220 16, 200 PMMA/PBA 28, 700 56, 200

An acid titration was done to determine the amount of MAA in the final polymer. A 0.146 g portion of the final polymer was dissolved in 5 cc THF and 1 cc

methanol, containing a drop of dilute phenolphthalein indicator solution. A total of 0.07 cc of 0.75 N aqueous NaOH solution was required to reach the end- point. The calculated equivalent weight of the final polymer was 278 g/mole. The calculated ratio of PEHMA total/PMAA in the final polymer was 0.97.

EXAMPLE 33

To a 3 ml glass vial (A) , containing Teflon^®-coated magnetic stir bar, was charged 0.0465 g (0.31 mmole) AgOCN, 0.0414 g (0.30 mmole) N-chlorosuccinimide, and 2 ml THF. The vial was sealed with a Teflon^®-coated rubber septum by means of a plastic screw cap and 22 gauge stainless needles were used to pass N₂ through the vapor space for about 15 minutes. The contents of the vial were stirred for 30 minutes, then the stirrer stopped to allow solids to settle to the bottom of the vial. A second 3 ml vial (B), containing a Teflon^®- coated magnetic stir bar, was charged with 1.07 ml

(10 mmole) MMA and was sealed with a Teflon^®-coated rubber septum and was purged with N2 for about 15 minutes. At t=O, 0.67 ml of the clear liquid phase from vial A was injected into vial B by syringe and the contents were stirred and heated in a 50° oil bath for about 16 hours. The liquid in vial B was then vacuum stripped (0.05 mm) to remove volatiles, giving rise to solid PMMA. A 3 ml glass vial (C), containing a

Teflon^®-coated stir bar, was charged with 0.0368 g of

PMMA (vial B), 1 ml BA, and 1 ml ethyl acetate. The vial was sealed with a Teflon^®-coated rubber septum, was purged with N₂ for about 15 minutes and was stirred and heated at 90° for 70 minutes. The contents of vial C were stripped (0.05 mm) to remove volatiles, giving rise to PMMA/PBA. A ¹Η NMR analysis of the PMMA/PBA showed the presence of PMMA ( CH₃ -O, 3.9 ppm) and PBA

(C₃H₇- CH₂ -O-, 4.0 ppm) in a mole ratio of PMMA/PBA =

1/9.8. Samples of PMMA (vial B) and PMMA/PBA (vial C) were analyzed by GPC.

GPC M_n M_w

PMMA 53,000 144,000

PMMA/PBA 193,000 1,050,000

The GPC elution curves for both polymers exhibited monomodal behavior. A 0.0274 g sample of PMMA (vial B), was combined with 1 ml of BA and 1 ml of ethyl acetate and was heated under N₂ for 20 hours at 45°. A ¹H NMR analysis of the final solution showed the presence of no significant PBA.

Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described hereinabove, it is to be understood that there is no intention to limit the invention to the precise constructions herein disclosed, and it is to be further understood that the right is reserved to all changes coming within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A process foro the polymerization of vinyl monomers, comprising, contacting:

(a) an acrylic monomer or N-phenylmaleimide;

(b) a diazotate of the formula Ar¹-N-N-O- M⁺, or a cyanate of the formula MOCN, or a hyponitrite of the formula M₂N₂O₂, wherein Ar¹ is aryl or substituted aryl, and M is a metal or a tetrahydro-carbylammonium ion; and

(c) N-chlorosuccinimide, N-bromosuccinimide, or a diazonium salt of the formula Ar²N₂ ⁺ X-, wherein Ar² is aryl or substituted aryl, and X is an anion.

2. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (a) component is a compound of the formula

wherein the open valence is attached to a hydrocarbyloxy or substituted hydrocarbyloxy group, or a hydroxy group, and R³ is an alkyl group containing up to 4 carbon atoms or hydrogen. 3. The process as recited in Claim 2 wherein said R³ is hydrogen or methyl.

4. The process as recited in Claim 3 wherein said (a) component is acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, methyl

methacrylate, butyl methacrylate, 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate, phenyl acrylate, cyclohexyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, or 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate.

5. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said M is an alkali metal or tetraalkylammonium.

6. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said Ar¹ contains one or more electron withdrawing substituents.

7. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said Ar¹ is p-nitrophenyl or p-cyanophenyl.

8. The process as recited in Claim 7 wherein said M is an alkali metal or tetraalkylammonium.

9. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said Ar² is derived from benzene. 10. The process as recited in Claim 9 wherein said Ar² is phenyl, or p-nitrophenyl.

11. The process as recited in Claim 6 wherein said Ar² is phenyl or p-nitrophenyl.

12. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (b) component is said diazotate.

13. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (b) component is said cyanate.

14. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (b) component is said hyponitrite.

15. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (c) component is said diazonium salt.

16. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said (c) component is N-chlorosuccinimide or N-bromosuccinimide.

17. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein said X is chloride, hexafluorophosphate, hexafluoro-antimonate, or tetrafluoroborate.

18. The process as recited in Claim 15 wherein said X is chloride, hexafluorophosphate, hexafluoro-antimonate, or tetrafluoroborate.

19. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein the temperature is about -20ºC to about 120°C.

20. The process as recited in Claim 19 wherein said temperature is about 0°C to about 60°C.

21. The process as recited in Claim 20 wherein said temperature is about 10°C to about 40ºC. 22. The process as recited in Claim 1 carried out in solution.

23. The process as recited in Claim 1 carried out as a suspension.

24. The process as recited in Claim 23 wherein said suspension is an. aqueous suspension.

25. The process as recited in Claim 1 carried out as an emulsion.

26. The process as recited in Claim 25 wherein said emulsion is an aqueous emulsion. 27. The process as recited in Claim 1 wherein a block copolymer is produced.

26. The process as recited in Claim 1, comprising the further step of a secondary polymerization.

29. The process as recited in Claim 28 wherein said secondary polymerization is carried out at about 80°C to about 120°C. 30. The process as recited in Claim 3, comprising the further step of a secondary polymerization.

31. The process as recited in Claim 28, wherein the product is a block copolymer.

32. The process as recited in Claim 30, wherein the product is a block copolymer.

33. The product of the process of Claim 1.

34. The product of the process of Claim 3.

35. The product of the process of Claim 11. 36. The product of the process of Claim 28.

37. The product of the process of Claim 30.

38. - The process as recited in Claim 29 wherein said secondary polymerization is carried out at about 90°C to about 100°C. 39. The process as recited in Claim 5 wherein said M is sodium, potassium or tetraalkylammonium.