WO1994004692A1

WO1994004692A1 - Dna sequences which lead to the formation of polyfructans (levans), plasmids containing these sequences as well as a process for preparing transgenic plants

Info

Publication number: WO1994004692A1
Application number: PCT/EP1993/002110
Authority: WO
Inventors: Manuela RÖBER; Gebhardt Geier; Klaus Geider; Lothar Willmitzer
Original assignee: Institut fuer Genbiologische Forschung Berlin GmbH
Current assignee: Institut fuer Genbiologische Forschung Berlin GmbH
Priority date: 1992-08-12
Filing date: 1993-08-09
Publication date: 1994-03-03
Anticipated expiration: 1995-02-12
Also published as: US6028249A; EP0663956B1; IL106646A0; ATE297998T1; AU4946893A; DE4227061A1; US5792923A; UA40598C2; CA2142308C; CA2142308A1; US6501005B1; EP0663956A1; JP3643591B2; JPH08500015A; DE69333833T2; HUT70977A; KR950703059A; AU682472B2; DE69333833D1

Abstract

There are described DNA sequences, which lead to the formation of polyfructans (levans), plasmids containing theses DNA sequences, as well as a process using these plasmids for preparing transgenic plants with polyfructan (levan) expression.

Description

Title: DNA sequences which lead to the formation of polyfructans (levans), plasmids containing these sequences as well as a process for preparing transgenic plants

Field of the invention

The present invention relates to DNA sequences which lead to the formation of polyfructans (levans), as well as a process for preparing transgenic plants using plasmids on which these DNA sequences are located.

High molecular weight, water soluble, linear polymers, for example those based on polyacrylates or polymethacrylates, are products of mineral oils and have many important uses. In particular their properties in increasing viscosity of aqueous systems, in suspending or sedimentation

acceleration and complexing are especially valuable from the technical viewpoint. These products are also used in exceptionally large amounts in super absorbers for water binding and in water dilutable lacquers. In spite of the outstanding positive properties, because such products are difficult to dispose of, their use is increasingly coming under criticism because they are not biodegradable.

Alternatives based on recyclable raw materials, especially starches and cellulose, because of the macromolecular structure of these polysaccharides, have been shown to have limited value. As a replacement for non-biodegradable chemically derived polymers, a number of derivatised high polymeric polysaccharides have been considered. Until now, such polysaccharides could only be obtained

biotechnologically via suitable fermentation and

transglycosidation processes. The products obtained in this way, such as dextrans and polyfructans (levans) are not competitive as raw materials for mass production.

Polyfructans are found in a number of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous higher plants, in green algae as well as in a number of gram positive and gram negative bacteria

(Meier and Reid, (1982) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, 13A. 418 - 471). The role of fructans for the plant development and plant growth is not fully

understood. Functions of the fructans that have been proposed are as a protection against freezing at low temperatures, as alternative carbohydrate stores by limiting starch biosynthesis, as well as applied

intermediary stores for photoassimilates, situated in the stems of grasses, shortly before their transfer into the seeds.

All fructans contain as starter molecule for the

polymerisation reaction, a molecule of sucrose (glucose-fructose) to which fructose polymers are added.

Depending on the coupling of the fructose molecule, fructans of plant origin can be classified into four classes (Meier and Reid (1982), Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, 13A, 418 - 471): a) (2-1) coupled β-D-fructans (inulin type) b) (2-6) coupled β-D-fructans (phlein or levan type) c) highly branched fructans with a mixture of 2-1 and 2- 6 couplings. d) (2-1) coupled β-D-fructans, which in contrast to the types under a - c, are added completely from

fructose residues of polymerisation both from glucose and also from fructose residues from polyfructose residues (neokestose type).

Fructans of bacterial origin correspond either to the levan or to the inulin type (Carlsson (1970) Caries

Research 4, 97 - 113) and Dedonder (1966) Methods

Enzymology 8, 500 - 505).

Experiments on the biosynthesis of fructans in plants and bacteria lead one to conclude that this proceeds by various routes. Bacterial and plant fructans are further distinguished, not particularly in their primary structure but mainly in their molecular weight. Thus, fructans isolated from plants have been shown to have molecular weights of between 5000 and 50,000 d (Pollock and

Chatterton (1988) in: The Biochemistry of Plants 14, 109 -140), whilst for fructans isolated from bacteria,

molecular weights of up to 2,000,000 d have been described (Clarke et al (1991) in: Carbohydrates as Organic Raw Materials, VCH Weinheim, 169 - 182).

Various microorganisms from the group of Bacillus spp as well as Streptococcus spp produce polyfructoses in which both fructans of the levan type and fructans of the inulin type have been described (Carlsson (1970) Caries Research 4, 97 - 113 and Dedonder (1966) Methods Enzymology 8, 500 - 505).

Experiments on biosynthesis pathways have made it clear that, in comparison to biosynthesis pathways in higher plants, there is a more simple pattern and a sharing of only one enzyme. This enzyme with the trivial name levan sucrase is a transfructosylase (sucrose: ß-D-fructosyl transferase, E.C.2.4.1.10.), which catalyses the following reaction: sucrose + acceptor => glucose + fructosyl acceptor

Representative acceptors are water, alcohol, sugar or polyfructoses. The hypothesis that only one enzyme catalyses this reaction, depends on the one hand on the examination of the protein chemically purified enzyme, and on the other to the fact that the gene for levan sucrase has been isolated from various Bacillus spp. as well as from a Streptococcus spp. and after transfer into E. coli leads to the formation of levan in E. coli (Gay et al

(1983) J. Bacteriology 153, 1424 - 1431 and Sato et al. (1986) Infection and Immunity 52, 166 - 170).

Until now, genes for levan sucrase from Bacillus

amyloliquefaciens (Tang et al. (1990) Gene 96, 89 - 93) and Bacillus subtilis (Steinmetz et al. (1985) Mol. Gen. Genetics 200, 220 - 228), have been described, which demonstrate relatively high homology with each other and both of which catalyse the synthesis of fructans of the levan type. Further a fructosyl transferase from

Streptococcus mutans (Shiroza et al. (1988) J.

Bacteriology 170, 810 - 816) has been described. This shows little homology to either levan sucrases from

Bacillus spp.. The fructan formed in Streptococcus mutans is of the inulin type.

In WO 89/12386, there is described the possibility of producing carbohydrate polymers such as dextran or levan in transgenic plants, especially in the fruit of

transgenic plants. To prepare these plants, the use of levan sucrases from Aerobacter levanicum , Streptococcus εalivarius and Bacillus subtilis and the use of dextran sucrases from Leuconostoc mesenteroides have been

described. Further the construction of chimeric genes is described which may be suitable for the expression of the levan sucrase from Bacillus subtilis as well as the dextran sucrase from Leuconoεtoc mesenteroides in transgenic plants. Also described is the preparation of transgenic plants containing these constructs. Further, the

preparation of transgenic plants that contain these constructs are described. Whether polyfructans can

actually be produced by the described process is not known.

There is also described a series of processes for

modifying the carbohydrate concentration and/or

concentrating carbohydrate in transgenic plants by means of biotechnological methods. Thus, in view of the fact that increasing starch concentration and modification of the starch in physical and chemical respects is already known, then a modification of the carbohydrate content of potato plants by raising or lowering the ADP-glucose-pyrophosphorylase activity can be achieved (EP 455 316).

From EP 442 592 it is further known that a modification of the distribution of photoassimilates by means of cytosolic and apoplastic invertase is possible and that the yield as well as the drought and frost resistance of potato plants through expression of a heterologous pyrophosphatase gene in potato plants can be modified.

In order to adapt the physico-chemical parameters of raw materials which are increasingly being used, such as polysaccharides, to the requirements of the chemical industry, as well as to minimise the costs of obtaining these products, processes for the preparation of transgenic plants have to be developed which lead in comparison with known processes to better, higher yielding plants. It has now been surprisingly found that the DNA sequence of the levan sucrase from a gram-negative bacterium of the species Erwinia amylovora with the nucleotide sequence

(Seq - ID NO 1):

GGATCCCCCG GGCTGCAGCG ATCATGGTTA TTTATAAGGG ATTGTTATGT 50

CCTGAAAACC ACACAACAGA ACCAGAGTGA TTTCAAAAAA TAAAAAGCTA 100 TTAATATACA GACCTTCAGC AAGAAGGTAT TCGAAATAAC CTGTGAGGAT

150

ATTT ATG TCA GAT

Met Ser Asp 163

TAT AAT TAT AAA CCA ACG CTG TGG ACT CGT GCC GAT GCA TTG AAA

Tyr Asn Tyr Lys Pro Thr Leu Trp Thr Arg Ala Asp Ala Leu Lys 208

5 10 15

GTT CAT GAG GAT GAC CCA ACC ACA ACT CAA CCG GTT ATT GAC ATT 253 Val His Glu Asp Asp Pro Thr Thr Thr Gln Pro Val Ile Asp Ile

20 25 30

GCA TTC CCG GTA ATG AGT GAA GAA GTC TTT ATT TGG GAT ACC ATG

Ala Phe Pro Val Met Ser Glu Glu Val Phe Ile Trp Asp Thr Met 298

35 40 45

CCA TTG CGA GAC TTC GAC GGA GAG ATT ATC TCT GTA AAT GGT TGG

Pro Leu Arg Asp Phe Asp Gly Glu Ile Ile Ser Val Asn Gly Trp 333

50 55 50

TGT ATT ATT TTT ACG CTA ACA GCA GAT CGC AAC ACT GAT AAT CCG 388 Cvs Ile Ile Phe Thr Leu Thr Ala Asp Arg Asn Thr Asp Asn Pro

65 70 75

CAA TTC CAG GAT GAA AAT GGC AAT TAT GAT ATT ACT CGT GAC TGG

Gln Phe Gln Asp Glu Asn Gly Asn Tyr Asp Ile Thr Arg Asp Trp 433

80 85 90

GAA GAC AGA CAT GGT CGT GCC CGT ATT TGT TAT TGG TAC TCA CGC

Glu Asp Arg His Gly Arg Ala Arg Ile Cys Tyr Trp Tyr Ser Arg 478

95 100 105

ACC GGT AAA GAC TGG ATT TTT GGC GGT CGG GTA ATG GCC GAA GGT 523 Thr Gly Lys Asp Trp Ile Phe Gly Gly Arg Val Met Ala Glu Gly

110 115 120

GTC GCA CCG ACG ACG CGT GAG TGG GCC GGA ACC CCG ATC CTT TTA

Val Ala Pro Thr Thr Arg Glu Trp Ala Gly Thr Pro Ile Leu Leu 568

125 130 135

AA.C GAT CGG GGC GAT ATT GAC CTG TAT TAT ACC TGT GTC ACT CCG 613 ASP ASP Arg Gly Asp Ile Asp Leu Tyr Tyr Thr Cys Val Thr Pro

140 145 150

GGT GCA ACC ATT GCC AAA GTG CGC GGT AAA ATC GTC ACT TCC GAT 658 Gly Ala Thr Ile Ala Lys Val Arg Gly Lys Ile Val Thr Ser Asp

155 160 165

CAA AGT GTA AGC CTG GAA GGT TTT CAG CAG GTT ACA TCA CTT TTC

Gln Ser Val Ser Leu Glu Gly Phe Gln Gln Val Thr Ser Leu Phe 703

170 I75 180

TCT GCT GAC GGG ACT ATT TAC CAG ACG GAA GAG CAG AAC GCT TTC 748

Ser Ala Asp Gly Thr Ile Tyr Gln Thr Glu Glu Gln Asn Ala Phe

185 150 195 TGG AAC TTC CGT GAC CCA AGC CCA TTC ATT GAC AGG AAT GAT GGC Trp Asn Phe Arg Asp Pro Ser Pro Phe Ile Asp Arg Asn Asp Gly 793

200 205 210

AAA TTA TAT ATG CTG TTT GAA GGA AAC GTG GCG GGG CCG CGC GGT

Lys Leu Tyr Met Leu Phe Glu Gly Asn Val Ala Gly Pro Arg Gly 838

215 220 225

TCG CAC GAA ATT ACC CAG GCT GAG ATG GGT AAT GTG CCG CCG GGT 883 Ser His Glu Ile Thr Gln Ala Glu Met Gly Asn Val Pro Pro Gly

230 235 240

TAT GAA GAT GTG GGT GGC GCA AAA TAT CAG GCA GGC TGT GTT GGT

Tyr Glu Asp Val Gly Gly Ala Lys Tyr Gln Ala Gly Cys Val Gly 928

245 250 255

CTG GCT GTG GCC AAA GAC CTG TCA GGC AGT GAG TGG CAA ATC CTG

Leu Ala Val Ala Lys Asp Leu Ser Gly Ser Glu Trp Gln Ile Leu 973

260 265 270

CCT CCG CTG ATC ACC GCT GTT GGC GTA AAC GAT CAG ACT GAA CGC 1018 Pro Pro Leu Ile Thr Ala Val Gly Val Asn Asp Gln Thr Glu Arg

275 280 285

CCT CAT TTT GTC TTC CAG GAT GGT AAA TAC TAT CTG TTC ACC ATT

Pro His Phe Val Phe Gln Asp Gly Lys Tyr .Tyr Leu Phe Thr Ile 1063

290 295 300

AGC CAT AAG TAC ACT TTT GCC GAT AAC CTG ACC GGC CCT GAT GGA 1108 Ser His Lys Tyr Thr Phe Ala Asp Asn Leu Thr Gly Pro Asp Gly

305 310 315

GTG TAT GGC TTT GTA AGC GAT AAA CTT ACC GGC CCT TAC ACG CCG

Val Tyr Gly Phe Val Ser Asp Lys Leu Thr Gly Pro Tyr Thr Pro 1153

320 325 330

ATG AAT AGC TCC GGG CTG GIG CTG GGC AAC CCG TCT TCA CAA CCT 1198 Met Asn Ser Ser Gly Leu Val Leu Gly Asn Pro Ser Ser Gln Pro

335 340 345

TTC CAG ACA TAT TCA CAC TAT GTT ATG CCT AAT GGG CTG GTC ACT 1243 Phe Gln Thr Tyr Ser His Tyr Val Met Pro Asn Gly Leu Val Thr

350 355 360

TCC TTT ATT GAC AGT GTT CCG TGG AAA GGT AAG GAC TAT CGC ATT

Ser Phe Ile Asp Ser Val Pro Tro Lys Gly Lvs Asp Tyr Arg Ile 1288

.365 370 375

GGC GGT ACT GAA GCT CCG ACC GTA AAA ATT CTG TTG AAA GGC GAT

Gly Gly Thr Glu Ala Pro Thr Val Lys Ile Leu Leu Lvs Gly Asp 1333

380 385 390

CGC TCA TTT ATT GTT GAT AGC TTC GAT TAT GGA TAT ATT CCG GCA 1378 Arg Ser Phe Ile Val A.sp Ser Phe Asp Tyr Gly Tyr Ile Pro Ala

395 400 405

ATG AAA GAC ATT ACT TTA AAA TAAGTCTGTT GTCGATATCA AGCTTATCGA1429 Met Lys Asp Ile Thr Leu Lys

410 415

TACCGTCGA 1438

makes possible the preparation of large amounts of

polyfructans (levans) in transgenic plants, which

decisively meet the needs of the chemical industry in respect of recyclable raw materials. By integration of a DNA sequence in a plant genome, on which the above given DNA sequence is located, the polyfructan (levan), expression in plants, especially in, leaves and tubers is made possible. The levan sucrase of the invention shows, at the DNA level, no significant homology to the known levan sucrases.

The invention further provides a process for the

preparation of transgenic plants with polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers that comprises the

following steps:

(a) preparation of a DNA sequence with the following

partial sequences:

i) a promoter which is active in plants and ensures formation of an RNA in the intended target tissues or target cells,

ii) a DNA sequence of a levan sucrase, and

iii) a 3'-non-translated sequence, which in plant

cells leads to the termination of the transcription as well as the addition of poly A residues to the 3'-end of the RNA,

(b) transfer and integration of the DNA sequence in the plant genome of a recombinant double stranded DNA molecule from plant cells using a plasmid, and

(c) regeneration of intact whole plants from the

transformed plant cells.

The levan sucrose obtained in process step (a,) ii) preferably shows the nucleotide sequence noted under sequence IC No 1.

The levan sucrase catalyses the following reaction: Sucrose-(fructose)_n + sucrose => sucrose-(fructose)_n+1 + glucose.

Using this process in principle, all plants can be

modified in respect to a polyfructan (levan) expression, preferably crops such as maize, rice, wheat, barley, sugar beet, sugar cane, tobacco and potatoes.

In process step (b), in principle all plasmids can be used which have the DNA sequence given under sequence ID No 1. Preferably used are plasmid p35s-CW-LEV (DSM) 7186), plasmid P35S-CY-LEV (DSM 7187) or plasmid P33-CW-LEV (DSM 7188). Since sucrose represents the substrate for the levan sucrase, the production of polyfructans is especially advantageous in those organs which store large amounts of sucrose. Such organs are for example the roots of sugar beet or the stems of sugar cane. It is especially useful in genetically modified potatoes, which store sucrose in their tubers, through blocking of starch biosynthesis

Biosynthesis of sucrose takes place in the cytosol, whilst in contrast, storage is in the vacuole. During transport into the storage tissues of sugar beet or potato or into the endosperm of seeds, the sucrose must cross the

intercellular space. In production of polyfructans, all three cell compartments are suitable, i.e. cytosol, vacuole and intercellular space.

The coding sequence of the levan sucrose of the nucleotide sequence ID No 1 can be provided with a promoter that ensures the transcription in specified orders which is coupled in sense orientation (3'-end of the promoter to the 5'-end of the coding sequence) on the coding sequence which codes the enzyme to be formed. The termination signal which determines the termination of the mRNA synthesis is adhered to the 3'-end of the coding sequence. In order to direct the enzyme which is expressed in specified sub-cellular compartments such as chloroplasts, amyloplasts, mitochondria, vacuoles, cytosol or

intercellular space, a so-called signal sequence or a transit peptide coding sequence can be positioned between the promoter and the coding sequence. This sequence must be in the same reading frame as the coding sequence of the enzyme.

For the introduction of the DNA sequence of the invention in higher plants, a large number of cloning vectors are available, which contain a replication signal for E. coli and a marker, which allows a selection of the transformed cells. Examples of vectors are pBR 322, pUC-series, M13 mp-series, pACYC 184; EMBL 3 etc.. According to the introduction method of the desired gene in the plant, other DNA sequences may be suitable. Should the Ti- or Ri-plasmid be used, e.g. for the transformation of the plant cell, then at least the right boundary, often however both the right and left boundary of the Ti- and Ri-Plasmid T-DNA, is attached, as a flanking region, to the gene being introduced. The use of T-DNA for the transformation of plants cells has been intensively researched and is well described in EP 120 516; Hoekama, In: The Binary Plant Vector System, Offset-drukkerij

Kanters B.V. Alblasserdam, (1985), Chapter V; Fraley, et al., Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 4:1-46 and An et al. (1985)

EMBO J. 4: 277-287. Once the introduced DNA is integrated in the genome, it is as a rule stable there and remains also in the offspring of the original transformed cells. It normally contains a selection marker, which induces resistance in the transformed plant cells against a biocide or antibiotic such as kanamycin, G 418, bleomycin, hygromycin or phosphinotricin etc. The individual marker employed should therefore allow the selection of

transformed cells from cells, which lack the introduced DNA.

For the introduction of DNA into a plant, besides

transformation using Agrobacteria, there are many other techniques available. These techniques include the fusion of protoplasts, microinjection of DNA and electroporation, as well as ballistic methods and virus infection. From the transformed plant material, whole plants can be

regenerated in a suitable medium, which contains

antibiotics or biocides for the selection. The resulting plants can then be tested for the presence of introduced DNA. No special demands are placed on the plasmids in injection and electroporation. Simple plasmids, such as e.g. pUC-derivatives can be used. Should however whole plants be regenerated from such transformed cells the presence of a selectable marker gene is necessary. The transformed cells grow within the plants in the usual manner (see also McCormick et al. (1986) Plant Cell Reports 5: 81-84) . These plants can be grown normally and crossed with plants, that possess the same transformed genes or different. The resulting hybrid individuals have the corresponding phenotypical properties.

Deposits

The following plasmids were deposited at the Deutschen Sammlung von Mikroorganismen (DSM) in Braunschweig,

Germany on the 16.07.1992 (deposit number):

Plasmid p35s-CW-LEV (DSM 7186)

Plasmid p35s-CY-LEV (DSM 7187)

Plasmid p33-CW-LEV (DSM 7188) Description of the Figures

Fig. 1 shows the structure of the p35-CW-LEV plasmid.

It comprises the three fragments A, B and C. Fragment A contains the 35s promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), nucleotides

6906 - 7437.

Fragment B contains the sequence of the nucleotides 689 - 2122 of the levan sucrase from Erwinia amylovora (Seq. ID No.1).

Fragment C contains the polyadenylation signal of the gene 3 of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid, pTi ACH 5, nucleotides 11749 - 11939.

Fig. 2 shows the structure of the p35s-CY-LEV plasmid.

It comprises the three fragments A, B and C.

Fragment A contains the 35s promoter of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), nucleotides 6909 - 7437.

Fragment B contains the sequence of the nucleotides 864 - 2122 of the levan sucrase from

Erwinia amylovora (Seq. ID No.1).

Fragment C contains the polyadenylation signal of the gene 3 of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid, pTi ACH 5.

Fig. 3 shows the structure of the p33-CW-LEV plasmid.

It comprises the three fragments A, B and C. Fragment A contains the Dral-Dral-fragment

(position -1512 to position +14) of the promoter region of the patatin gene B33.

Fig. 4 shows the detection of polyfructan in

transformed tobacco plants (No. 2, 3 and 13). In this:

Fru = fructose, Sue = sucrose, Kes = kestose c1 = control 1, c2 = controle 2, M = marker

In order to understand the examples forming the basis of this invention all the processes necessary for these tests and which are known per se will first of all be listed:

1. Cloning process

The vector pUC 18 (Yanisch-Perron et al. (1985) Gene 33: 103-119) was used for cloning.

For the plant transformations, the gene constructs were cloned in the binary vector BIN 19 (Bevan (1984) Nucl. Acids Res 12: 8711-8720)

2. Bacterial strains

The E . coli strain BMH71-18 (Messing et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1977), 24, 6342-6346) or TB1 was used for the pUC vectors. TB1 is a recombinant-negative,

tetracycline-resistant derivative of strain JM101

(Yanisch-Perron et al., Gene (1985), 33, 103-119). The genotype of the TBl strain is (Bart Barrel, personal communication): F' (traD36, proAB, lacI, lacZΔM15), Δ(lac, pro), SupE, this, recA, Sri::Tn10 (TcR).

The transformation of the plasmids into the potato plants was carried out using Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 (Bevan, (1984), Nucl. Acids Res. 12, 8711-8720). 3. Transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens

In the case of BIN19 derivatives, the insertion of the DNA into the Agrobacterium was effected by direct

transformation in accordance with the method of Holsters et al.. (1978) (Mol Gene Genet 163: 181-187). The plasmid DNA of the transformed Agrobacterium was isolated in accordance with the method of Birnboim and Doly (1979) (Nucl Acids Res 7: 1513-1523) and was analysed by gel electrophoresis after suitable restriction cleavage.

4. Plant transformation

A) Tobacco: 10 ml of an overnight culture of Agrobacterium tumefaciens , grown under selection, were centrifuged off, the supernatant was discarded, and the bacteria were resuspended in the same volume of antibiotic-free medium. In a sterile petri dish, leaf discs of sterile plants (approximately 1 cm²), the central vein of which had been removed, were immersed in this bacterial suspension. The leaf discs were then placed in a closely packed

arrangement in petri dishes containing MS medium

(Murashige et al. (1962) Physiologia Plantarum 15, 473-497) with 2% sucrose and 0.8% bacto agar. After two days incubation in the dark at 25°C, they were transferred onto MS medium containing 100 mg/l kanamycin, 500 mg/l

claforan, 1 mg/l benzylaminopurine (BAP), 0.2 mg/l of naphthylacetic acid (NAA) and 0.8 % bacto agar. Growing shoots were transferred onto hormone-free MS medium with 250 mg/l of claforan.

B) Potato: Ten small leaves, wounded with a scalpel, of a sterile potato culture were placed in 10 ml of MS medium with 2% sucrose containing 30-50 μl of an Agrobacterium tumefacienε overnight culture grown under selection. After 3-5 minutes gentle shaking, the leaves were laid out on MS medium of 1.6% glucose, 2 mg/l of zeatin ribose, 0.02 mg/l of naphthylacetic acid, 0.02 mg/l of gibberellic acid, 500 mg/l of claforan, 50 mg/l of kanamycin and 0.8% bacto agar. After incubation for one week at 25°C and 3000 lux, the claforan concentration in the medium was reduced by half. Further cultivation was carried out using the method described by Rocha-Sosa et al. (1989) EMBO Journal 8, 29).

5. Analysis of genomic DNA from transgenic plants

The isolation of genomic plant DNA was carried out

according to Rogers et al. (1985) Plant Mol Biol 5,

69-76).

For the DNA analysis, after suitable restriction cleavage, 10 to 20 μg of DNA were analysed, by means of Southern blotting, for the integration of the DNA sequences to be investigated.

6. Analysis of the total RNA from transgenic plants

The isolation of plant total RNA was carried out

according to Logemann et al . (1987), Analytical Biochem. 163. 16-20.

For the analysis, 50 μg portions of total RNA were

investigated, by means of Northern blotting, for the presence of the transcripts sought.

7. Extraction and determination of polyfructose in

plants

The extraction and determination were carried out

according to the method of Portis H. G. (1990), Meth.

Plant Biochem. 2 , 353-369. Example 1

Preparation of plasmid p35s-CW-LEV and insertion of the plasmid into the genome of tobacco and potato The plasmid p35s-CW-LEV comprises the three fragments A, B and C, which were cloned in the cutting sites for

restriction enzymes of the polylinker from pUC 18 (see Fig. 1). Fragment A contains the 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). It contains a fragment that includes the nucleotides 6909 to 7437 of CaMV (Franck et al . (1980) Cell 21, 285-294) and was isolated as Eco RI-Kpn I

fragment from plasmid pDH 51 (Pietrzak et al ., Nucleic Acids Research 14, 5857-5868) and cloned between the Eco RI-Kpn I cutting sites of the polylinker of plasmid pUC 18.

Fragment B contains the sequence of the nucleotides 689 -2122 of the gene of the levan sucrase from Erwinia

amylovora (Seq. ID No.1) and was cloned between the

BamHI/Sall cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18.

Fragment C contains the polyadenylation signal of the gene 3 of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid, pTi ACH 5 (Gielen et al (1984); EMBO J. 3, 835 - 846) nucleotides 11749 - 11939 which was insolated as Pvu II-Hind III fragment from the plasmid pAGV 40 (Herrera-Estrella et al (1983) Nature 303, 209 - 213) and, after addition of Sph I linkers to the Pvu II cutting positions, was cloned between the Sphl-Hind III cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18. von pUC 18. The plasmid p35s-CW-LEV has a size of 2151 bp.

The part of the plasmid p35s-CW-LEV comprising the

fragments A, B and C was introduced in binary vectors and using the Agrobakteria system was introduced into tobacco and potato plants. Intact plants were regenerated from transformed cells. The analysis of the leaves from a series of Tobacco plants transformed with this gene, clearly showed the presence of polyfructan (levan) which is traced back to the expression of the gene 35s-Cw-LEV (see Fig. 4).

Example 2

Preparation of plasmid p35s-CY-LEV and insertion of the plasmid into the genome of tobacco and potato

This Example was carried out in an analogous manner to that described under Example 1, but with the modification, that the Fragment B (coding for the levan sucrase) is shortened on the nucleotide at the 5'-end. This results in the expression of the protein in the cytosol of transgenic plants. The plasmid p35s-CY-LEV comprises the three fragments A, B and C, which were cloned in the cutting sites for

restriction enzymes of the polylinker from pUC 18 (see Fig. 2). Fragment A contains the 35S promoter of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV). It contains a fragment that includes the nucleotides 6909 to 7437 of CaMV (Franck et al. (1980) Cell 21, 285-294) and was isolated as Eco RI-Kpn I

fragment from plasmid pDH 51 (Pietrzak et a l ., Nucleic Acids Research 14, 5857-5868) and cloned between the Eco RI-Kpn I cutting sites of the polylinker of plasmid pUC 18.

Fragment B contains the sequence of the nucleotides 864-2122 of the gene of the levan sucrase from Erwinia amylovora (Seq. ID No.1) and was cloned between the

Smal/Sall cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18.

Fragment C contains the polyadenylation signal of the gene 3 of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid, pTi ACH 5 (Gielen et al (1984); EMBO J. 3, 835 - 846) nucleotides 11749 - 11939 which was insolated as Pvu II-Hind III fragment from the plasmid pAGV 40 (Herrera-Estrella et al (1983) Nature 303, 209 - 213) and, after addition of Sph I linkers to the Pvu II cutting positions, was cloned between the Sphl-Hind III cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18.von pUC 18. The plasmid p35s-CY-LEV has a size of 1976 bp.

The part of the plasmid p35s-CY-LEV comprising the

fragments A, B and C was introduced in binary vectors and using the Agrobakteria system was introduced_into tobacco and potato plants. Intact plants were regenerated from transformed cells. Example 3

This Example was carried out in an analogous manner to that described under Example 1, but with the 35s promoter being replaced with the promoter of the class I patatin Gene B33 (Rocha-Sosa et al, (1989) EMBO J 8, 23 - 29) The plasmid p33-CW-LEV comprises the three fragments A, B and C, which were cloned in the cutting sites for

restriction enzymes of the polylinker from pUC 18 (see Fig. 3).

Fragment A contains the Dral-Dral fragment (position -1512 to position +14) of the promoter region of the patatin gene B33 (Rocha-Sosa et al (1989) EMBO J. 8, 23 - 29), which was cloned in the Sma I position of the polylinker of pUC 118.

Fragment B contains the sequence of the nucleotides

689-2122 of the gene of the levan sucrase from Erwinia amylovora (Seq. ID No.1) and was cloned between the

BamHI/Sall cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18.

Fragment C contains the polyadenylation signal of the gene 3 of the T-DNA of the Ti-plasmid, pTi ACH 5 (Gielen et al (1984); EMBO J. 3, 835 - 846) nucleotides 11749 - 11939 which was insolated as Pvu II-Hind III fragment from the plasmid pAGV 40 (Herrera-Estrella et al (1983) Nature 303, 209 - 213) and, after addition of Sph I linkers to the Pvu II cutting positions, was cloned between the Sphl-Hind III cutting positions of the polylinker of pUC 18.von pUC 18. The plasmid p33-CW-LEV has a size of 3149 bp.

The part of the plasmid p33-CW-LEV comprising the

fragments A, B and C was introducded in binary vectors and using the Agrobakteria system was introduced into tobacco and potato plants. Intact plants were regenerated from transformed cells. The analysis of the leaves from a series of Tobacco plants transformed with this gene, clearly showed the presence of polyfructan (levan) which is traced back to the expression of the gene 33-CW-LEV.

Example 4

Analysis of β2,6-D-Fructofurane (levan) synthesised in transgenic plants by 13C-NMR spectroscopy

The analysis of transgenic plants transformed with the construct p35s-CW-LEV is shown as an example. This analysis can equally be applied to transgenic plants transformed with the constructs p35S-CW-LEV or p35s-CY-LEV.

To obtain sufficient amounts of levan synthesised by transgenic plants to perform NMR spectroscopy, about lOg of leave tissue were grinded in 10ml of water. The homogenate is than centrifuged at 4000 Rpm in a Beckman Minifuge and the supernatant is applied to a PDIO column (LKB-Pharmacia) to remove lower molecular weight compounds. The column had been equilibrated with water before 2.5 ml of the supernatant are applied and higher molecular weight compounds are then eluted with 3.5 ml of water. The elute was further purified by adding ion exchange beads (AG 501 X8, Biorad) and shaking for 30 minutes. After centrifugation at 4000 Rpm (Minifuge, Beckman) to remove the beads, the supernatant is applied to a Sepharose 4B column (diameter 16 cm, separating volume 24 ml) to remove short sugar chains. The elute is vacuum dried in a vacuum centrifuge (univapo 150 H, Uniquip, Martinsried (FRG) and than analysed by 13C-NMR under the following conditions:

PULPROG zgdc30 F2 - Processing parameters

SOLVENT D20 SI 32768

AQ 1.3762726 sec SF 100.5485322 MHz

FIDRES 0.363305 Hz WDW EM

DW 21.0 usec SSB 0

RG 32768 LB 0.50 Hz

NUCLEUS 13C GB 0

Dll 0.0300000 sec PC 1.40

P31 100.0 usec

S2 20 dB 10 NMR plot parameters

HL1 1 dB CX 33.00 cm

Dl 1.0000000 sec F1P 123.000 ppm

P1 6.5 usec F1 12367.47 Hz

DE 26.3 usec F2P -6.000 ppm

SF01 100.5597430 MHz F2 -603.29 Hz

SWH 23S09.58 Hz PPMCM 3.90909 ppm/cm

TD 65536 HZCM 393.05334 Hz/cm

NS 8000

DS 2

The result of the analysis is shown in Fig. 5. The pattern of NMR peaks obtained is the same as it is obtained for levan as published by Gross et al., 1992, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 40:

371.

This proves that the transformed plants synthesise levan after transformation by one of the constructs described in examples 1 to 3.

Claims

DNA sequence, on which the sequence of a levan sucrase is located, characterised in that the sequence of the levan sucrase is derived from a gram- negative bacterium of the species Erwinia amylovora with the nucleotide sequence (Seq - ID NO 1):

GGATCCCCCG GGCTGCAGCG ATCATGGTTA TTTATAAGGG ATTGTTATGT 50 CCTGAAAA.CC ACACAACAGA ACCAGAGTGA TTTCAAAAAA TAAAAAGCTA 100 TTAATATACA GACCTTCAGC AAGAAGGTAT TCGAAATAAC CTGTGAGGAT

150

ATTT ATG TCA GAT

Met Ser Asp 163

TAT AAT TAT AAA CCA ACG CTG TGG ACT CGT GCC GAT GCA TTG AAA

Tyr Asn Tyr Lys Pro Thr Lau Trp Thr Arg Ala Asp Ala Leu Lys 208

5 10 15

GTT CAT GAG GAT GAC CCA ACC ACA ACT CAA CCG GTT ATT GAC ATT 253

Val His Glu Asp Asp Pro Thr Thr Thr Gln Pro Val Ile Asp lie

20 25 30

GCA TTC CCG GTA ATG AGT GAA GAA GTC TTT ATT TGG GAT ACC ATG

Ala Phe Pro Val Met Ser Glu Glu Val Phe Ile Trp Asp Thr Met 298

35 40 45

CCA TTG CGA GAC TTC GAC GGA GAG ATT ATC TCT GTA AAT GGT TGG ₃₃₃ Pro Leu Arg Asp Phe Asp Gly Glu Ile Ile Ser Val Asn Gly Trp

50 55 60

TGT ATT ATT TTT ACG CTA ACA GCA GAT CGC AAC ACT GAT AAT CCG 388 Cys Ile Ile Phe Thr Leu Thr Ala Asp Arg Asn Thr Asp Asn Pro

65 70 75

CAA TTC CAG GAT GAA AAT GGC AAT TAT GAT ATT ACT CGT GAC TGG

Gln Phe Gln Aso Glu Asn Gly Asn Tyr Asp Ile Thr Arg Asp Trp 433

80 85 90

GAA GAC AGA CAT GGT CGT GCG CGT ATT TGT TAT TGG TAC TCA CGC 478

Glu Asυ Arg His Gly Arg Ala Arg Ile Cys Tyr Trp Tyr Ser Arg

95 100 105

ACC GGT AAA GAC TGG ATT TTT GGC GGT CGG GTA ATG GCC GAA GGT 523

Thr Gly Lys Asp Trp Ile Phe Gly Gly Arg Val Met Ala Glu Gly

110 115 120

GTC GCA CCG ACG ACG CGT GAG TGG GCC GGA ACC CCG ATC CTT TTA

Val Ala Pro Thr Thr Arg Glu Trp Ala Gly Thr Pro Ile Leu Leu 568 125 130 135

AAC GAT CGG GGC GAT ATT GAC CTG TAT TAT ACC TGT GTC ACT CCG 613

Vsn Asp Arg Gly Asp Ile Asp Leu Tyr Tyr Thr Cys Val Thr Pro

140 145 150 658

GGT GCA ACC ATT GCC AAA GTG CGC GGT AAA ATC GTC ACT TCC GAT

Gly Ala Thr Ile Ala Lys Val Arg Gly Lys Ile Val Thr Ser Asp

155 160 165

CAA AGT GTA AGC CTG GAA GGT TTT CAG CAG GTT ACA TCA CTT TTC

Gln Ser Val Ser Leu Glu Gly Phe Gln Gln Val Thr Ser Leu Phe 703

170 175 180 TCT GCT GAC GGG ACT ATT TAC CAG ACG GAA GAG CAG AAC GCT TTC 743 Ser A la Asp Gly Thr Ile Tyr Gln Thr Glu Glu Gln Asn Ala Phe

185 190 195

TGG AAC TTC CGT GAC CCA AGC CCA TTC ATT GAC AGG AAT GAT GGC

Trp Asn Phe Arg Aso Pro Ser Pro Phe Ile Asp Arg Asn Aso Gly 793

200 205 210

AAA TTA TAT ATG CTG TTT GAA GGA AAC GTG GCG GGG CCG CGC GGT

Lvs Leu Tyr Met Leu Phe Glu Gly Asn Val Ala Gly Pro Arg Gly 838 215 220 225

230 235 240

TAT GAA GAT GTG GGT GGC GCA AAA TAT CAG GCA GGC TGT GTT GGT

Tyr Glu Aso Val Gly Gly Ala Lys Tyr Gln Ala Gly Cvs Val Gly 928

245 250 255

CTG GCT GTG GCC AAA GAC CTG TCA GGC AGT GAG TGG CAA ATC CTG

Leu Ala Val Ala Lys Aso Leu Ser Gly Ser Glu Tro Gln Ile Leu 973

260 265 2?0

275 280 285

CCT CAT TTT GTC TTC CAG GAT GGT AAA TAC TAT CTG TTC ACC ATT

Pro His Phe Val Phe Gln Asp Gly Lys Tyr Tyr Leu Phe Thr Ile 1063

290 295 300

AGC CAT AAG TAC ACT TTT GCC GAT AAC CTG ACC GGC CCT GAT GGA 1108 Ser His Lys Tyr Thr Phe Ala Asp Asn Leu Thr Gly Pro Aso Gly

305 310 315

GTG TAT GGC TTT GTA AGC GAT AAA CTT ACC GGC CCT TAC ACG CCG

Val Tyr Gly Phe Val Ser Asp Lys Leu Thr Gly Pro Tyr Thr Pro 1153

320 325 330

ATG AAT AGC TCC GGG CTG GTG CTG GGC AAC CCG TCT TCA CAA CCT 1198 Met Asn Ser Ser Gly Leu Val Leu Gly Asn Pro Ser Ser Gln Pro

335 340 345

TTC CAG ACA TAT TCA CAC TAT GTT ATG CCT AA.T GGG CTG GTC ACT 1243 Phe Gln Thr Tyr Ser His Tyr Val Met Pro Asn Gly Leu Val Thr

350 355 360

TCC TTT ATT GAC AGT GTT CCG TGG AAA GGT AAG GAC TAT CGC ATT

Ser Phe Ile Aso Ser Val Pro Trp Lys Gly Lys Aso Tyr Arg Ile 1288

365 370 375

GGC GGT ACT GAA GCT CCG ACC GTA AAA ATT CTG TTG AAA GGC GAT

Gly Gly Thr Glu Ala Pro Thr Vai Lys Ile Leu Leu Lys Gly Asp 1333

380 385 390.

CGC TCA TTT ATT GTT GAT AGC TTC GAT TAT GGA TAT ATT CCG GCA 1378 Arg Ser Phe Ile Val Asp Ser Phe Asp Tyr Gly Tyr Ile Pro Ala

395 400 405

ATG AAA GAC ATT ACT TTA AAA TAA.GTCTGTT GTCGATATCA AGCTTATCGA1429 Met Lys Aso Ile Thr Leu Lys

410 415

TACCGTCGA 1438

whereby by integration of this sequence in a plant

genome, polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers is made possible.

2. Plasmids containing a DNA sequence according to claim 1, for the preparation of plants with polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers.

3. Plasmid p35s-CW-LEV (DSM 7186).

4. Plasmid p35s-CY-LEV (DSM 7187).

5. Plasmid p33-CW-LEV (DSM 7188).

6. Process for the preparation of transgenic plants with polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers which comprises the following steps:

(a) preparation of a DNA sequence with the following partial sequences:

ii) DNA sequence of a levan sucrase according to claim 1, and

iii) a 3'-non-translated sequence, which in

plant cells leads to the termination of the transcription as well as the addition of poly A residues to the 3'-end of the RNA, (b) transfer and integration of the DNA sequence in the plant genome of a recombinant double stranded DNA molecule from plant cells using a plasmid according to any one of claims 2 to 5, and

(c) regeneration of intact whole plants from the transformed plant cells.

7. Process according to claim 6, characterised in that the polyfructan (levan) sucrase expression in leaves and tubers leads to a polyfructan (levan) sucrase activity in the chloroplasts, amyloplasts,

mitochondria, cytosol, inter cellular space and/or vacuoles.

8. A plant obtained by the process according to claims 6 or 7.

9. A plant according to claim 8, which is crop plant.

10. A plant according to claim 8 or 9, which is a maize, rice, wheat, barley, sugar beet, sugar cane, tobacco or potato plant.

11. Use of the DNA sequence according to claim 1, for the preparation of plants with polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers.

12. Use of the plasmids according to any one of claim 2 to 5, for the preparation of plants with polyfructan (levan) expression in leaves and tubers.