WO1994006942A1 - Method for dehairing of hides or skins - Google Patents

Method for dehairing of hides or skins Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1994006942A1
WO1994006942A1 PCT/DK1993/000283 DK9300283W WO9406942A1 WO 1994006942 A1 WO1994006942 A1 WO 1994006942A1 DK 9300283 W DK9300283 W DK 9300283W WO 9406942 A1 WO9406942 A1 WO 9406942A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
hides
dehairing
skins
hide
hairs
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/DK1993/000283
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Lars Peter Andersen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novo Nordisk AS
Original Assignee
Novo Nordisk AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Novo Nordisk AS filed Critical Novo Nordisk AS
Priority to BR9306942A priority Critical patent/BR9306942A/en
Priority to EP93919037A priority patent/EP0660879A1/en
Priority to KR1019950700277A priority patent/KR950702643A/en
Priority to JP6507708A priority patent/JPH08504222A/en
Publication of WO1994006942A1 publication Critical patent/WO1994006942A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C14SKINS; HIDES; PELTS; LEATHER
    • C14CCHEMICAL TREATMENT OF HIDES, SKINS OR LEATHER, e.g. TANNING, IMPREGNATING, FINISHING; APPARATUS THEREFOR; COMPOSITIONS FOR TANNING
    • C14C1/00Chemical treatment prior to tanning
    • C14C1/06Facilitating unhairing, e.g. by painting, by liming
    • C14C1/065Enzymatic unhairing
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C14SKINS; HIDES; PELTS; LEATHER
    • C14CCHEMICAL TREATMENT OF HIDES, SKINS OR LEATHER, e.g. TANNING, IMPREGNATING, FINISHING; APPARATUS THEREFOR; COMPOSITIONS FOR TANNING
    • C14C1/00Chemical treatment prior to tanning
    • C14C1/06Facilitating unhairing, e.g. by painting, by liming

Definitions

  • the invention comprises a method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes.
  • the dehairing of hides or skins is an old art, which at least dates back to around the turn of the century.
  • the prior art dehairing methods suffer from the following two drawbacks: 1 ) large quantities of sulfide or other environmentally dangerous chemicals have been necessary during the dehairing, and 2) the entire part of or the major part of the removed hair was dissolved to a point that it could not be put to any useful purpose, and as a consequence - and this is even more important - the BOD 5 is too high from an environmental point of view.
  • the purpose of the invention to provide a method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes, in relation to which 1) only small quantities of sulfide are necessary, and 2) the hair is removed completely and in an undamaged form useful for further use of the hairs and without environmental harm.
  • the method according to the invention for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes is characterized by the fact that
  • the thus treated hides or skins are dehaired a) by addition of water and exposure to mechanical influence, whereby the water is added in an amount which provides satisfactory rubbing between the individual hides or skins, b) by simultaneous or arbitrarily sequential addition of a base in an amount which is sufficient for raising the pH of the dehairing liquor to between 9.0 and 12.5, and one or more alkaline proteolytic enzymes in an amount corresponding to between 10 and 150 mg of pure enzyme protein / kg of dry hide or skin, preferably between 20 and 50 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, most preferably between 30 and 40 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, and c) by subsequent addition of an easily soluble sulfide in an amount of maximum 0.12% S " in relation to the hide weight or skin weight, before the hairs are immunized by the base, whereby the hairs are removed during the dehairing.
  • the method according to the invention is especially well suited in relation to bovine hides.
  • the method for dehairing of hides and skins according to the invention can also be used for hides or skins of other provenance, e.g. sheep skins or goat skins.
  • step 1) and the main soak in step 2) are carried out in a conventional way and thus in themselves are not inventive, but that they do form part of the entire invention including the dehairing step 3).
  • steps 1), 2) and 3) are performed in the same equipment, preferably a beam house drum, but they may be carried out in different pieces of equipment.
  • an alkaline proteolytic enzyme in this specification with claims is defined as a proteolytic enzyme which according to the CPU activity determination method, in which Hammersten casein is used as a substrate (reference being made to AF 228/1 , obtainable on request from Novo Nordisk A/S), exhibits a pH activity curve with a maximum above pH 7.
  • these alkaline proteolytic enzymes which can be used in the method according to the invention are the proteases described in WO 92/17576, WO 89/06279, WO 91/00345, and PCT/DK93/00074.
  • the immunization of the hair is a reaction, wherein the -S-S-bridge is converted to an -S-bridge in alkaline medium, whereby the hair is rendered insoluble in Na 2 S solution. Immunization is a potentially misleading term, which, however, is accepted in this field. Denaturation might be a better term.
  • the aqueous phase in step 3) is identified as the dehairing float in this specification with claims.
  • step 3b If the sulfide is added too early after step 3b), i.e. immediately after or shortly after step 3b), the remaining hair, which is still adhering to the hide, will be dissolved, and if the sulfide is added too late, i.e. after completion of the immunization, the hairs cannot longer be removed from the hides.
  • the average worker in the art will know when to add the sulfide, on the basis of the instructions indicated in this specification with claims, i.e. as follows. As a guideline a preliminary dehairing experiment can be carried out, according to the invention, and all variable parameters can be noted.
  • step 3b) and step 3c) samples can be taken out regularly, and for each sample it can be determined, if the hairs are immunized or not (if immunized, the hairs cannot be removed from the hides by addition of Na 2 S). It will be found that the first samples are not immunized, and that all samples beginning with a critical sample are immunized. The time corresponding to the sample immediately preceding the critical sample will be the ideal time for addition of the sulfide. Usually step 3c) is performed around 4-12 hours after step 3b), depending upon the kind and concentration of the base. Also, a guideline in regard to the time interval between step 3b) and 3c) can be extracted from the following examples.
  • MPX for dehairing of hides (B 533a-GB 2000 Oct. 1989 NHS) describes a prior art dehairing process, in which an amount of 0.36% of S " (related to the dry weight of hides) is recommended. Usually, the process will not work satisfactorily with a smaller concentration of S " . From Bibliotek des Leders, Band 2, altern der Wasserwerkstatt Anlagen Anlagen der Lederher ein, 1988, Umschau Verlag, page 62-63 it appears that one of the classical dehairing methods comprises hair destruction, i.e. dissolution of the hair. This method is very disadvantageous from an environmental point of view. In the process according to the invention the hairs are not dissolved at all.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that a green fleshing is carried out between step 2) and 3).
  • the following advantages are obtained: 1) the enzymatic action during the dehairing is improved due to the reduced amount of fat in the dehairing float and on the hides or skins, 2) the sewage water contains less fat and is thus more acceptable from an environmental point of view, 3) the fat removed during the green fleshing will not be exposed to sulfides and will thus exhibit a better quality, and 4) the necessary amount of S " in step 3c) will be less, in certain cases even 0.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3a) the amount of water added to the treated hides or skins is between 30 and 200% in relation to the dry weight of the hides or skins, preferably between 75 and 125% thereof. With an amount of water less than 30% the abrasion of the hides or skins will be damaging, and with an amount of water above 200% the mechanical impact will be too low, and also, the consumption of water will be undesirably high.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) the base is Ca(OH) 2 or NaOH.
  • the base is Ca(OH) 2 or NaOH.
  • the BOD 5 is kept relatively low, in contradistinction to the case, when e.g. NH 3 is used as the base.
  • Ca(OH) 2 is even better than NaOH, because Ca(OH) 2 cannot damage the hides if an overdose of Ca(OH) 2 is accidentally used.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the alkaline proteolytic enzyme is the proteolytic enzyme producible by means of an alcalophilic Bacillus species. It has been found experimentally that an enzyme of this kind gives rise to a satisfactory dehairing.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the alkaline proteolytic enzyme exhibits a pH activity curve with a maximum above pH 9, according to the CPU activity determination method. In this manner a very satisfactory removal of the hairs is obtained.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) the base is added before the proteolytic enzyme. In this manner local, extremely high pH values are avoided, which might inactivate the alkaline protease.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) maximum 0.02% S " is added, in relation to the dry hide weight or the dry skin weight.
  • S " maximum 0.02%
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3c) the sulfide is Na 2 S or NaHS.
  • Na 2 S or NaHS are the cheapest sulfides on the market, and no other sulfides perform better than Na 2 S or
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the sulfide is added as late as possible before the immunization of the hairs. In this manner no hair at all is dissolved, and the maximum amount of hair can be collected.
  • a preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the hairs are removed from the dehairing liquor by continuous filtration during the dehairing. If no continuous filtration is carried out the hairs will tend to adhere to the fatty tissue on the back of the hide or skin.
  • US 3,840,433 a dehairing method with a specially selected group of alkaline proteases is described. The final leather product resulting from this dehairing, however, exhibits a tendency towards grain damage and nubuckisation, in contradistinction to the leather product resulting from the dehairing method according to the invention.
  • the method according to the invention will be illustrated by the following examples.
  • transportation times are included in the time schedule.
  • interval between two consecutive times does not necessarily correspond to the duration of the treatment in question. All percentages are calculated in relation to the dry weight of hide or skin.
  • Both hides are clean.
  • the bull hide is more fresh than the cow hide.
  • the cow hide is more dry on the hair side than the bull hide.
  • the bull hide is more dry on the flesh side than the cow hide. Both hides comprise a relatively small amount of fat.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the
  • the enzyme is the
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
  • the enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 89/06279.
  • Example 5 For a somewhat more detailed description of Example 5, reference is made to the below indicated table.
  • protease is the protease preparation described in Example 1 in WO 89/06279
  • protease is the protease preparation described in Example 1 in WO 89/06279

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Treatment And Processing Of Natural Fur Or Leather (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Enzymes And Modification Thereof (AREA)
  • Chemical Or Physical Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)

Abstract

The method comprises soaking and subsequent dehairing by controlled addition of alkaline proteolytic enzymes and a small amount of Na2S. The hair is removed completely and without environmental harm.

Description

METHOD FOR DEHAIRING OF HIDES OR SKINS
The invention comprises a method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes.
The dehairing of hides or skins is an old art, which at least dates back to around the turn of the century. The prior art dehairing methods suffer from the following two drawbacks: 1 ) large quantities of sulfide or other environmentally dangerous chemicals have been necessary during the dehairing, and 2) the entire part of or the major part of the removed hair was dissolved to a point that it could not be put to any useful purpose, and as a consequence - and this is even more important - the BOD5 is too high from an environmental point of view.
Thus, it is the purpose of the invention to provide a method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes, in relation to which 1) only small quantities of sulfide are necessary, and 2) the hair is removed completely and in an undamaged form useful for further use of the hairs and without environmental harm. The method according to the invention for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes is characterized by the fact that
1 ) the hides or skins are soaked
2) the soaked hides or skins are exhibited to a main soak, and
3) the thus treated hides or skins are dehaired a) by addition of water and exposure to mechanical influence, whereby the water is added in an amount which provides satisfactory rubbing between the individual hides or skins, b) by simultaneous or arbitrarily sequential addition of a base in an amount which is sufficient for raising the pH of the dehairing liquor to between 9.0 and 12.5, and one or more alkaline proteolytic enzymes in an amount corresponding to between 10 and 150 mg of pure enzyme protein / kg of dry hide or skin, preferably between 20 and 50 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, most preferably between 30 and 40 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, and c) by subsequent addition of an easily soluble sulfide in an amount of maximum 0.12% S" in relation to the hide weight or skin weight, before the hairs are immunized by the base, whereby the hairs are removed during the dehairing.
It should be noted that the method according to the invention is especially well suited in relation to bovine hides. However, the method for dehairing of hides and skins according to the invention can also be used for hides or skins of other provenance, e.g. sheep skins or goat skins.
It is to be understood that the soak in step 1) and the main soak in step 2) are carried out in a conventional way and thus in themselves are not inventive, but that they do form part of the entire invention including the dehairing step 3). Reference can be made to Bibliotek des Leders, Band 2, Arbeiten der Wasserwerkstatt bei der Lederherstellung, 1988, Umschau Verlag, page 26-62. Usually steps 1), 2) and 3) are performed in the same equipment, preferably a beam house drum, but they may be carried out in different pieces of equipment.
In regard to the dehairing step 3) it should be noted that an alkaline proteolytic enzyme in this specification with claims is defined as a proteolytic enzyme which according to the CPU activity determination method, in which Hammersten casein is used as a substrate (reference being made to AF 228/1 , obtainable on request from Novo Nordisk A/S), exhibits a pH activity curve with a maximum above pH 7. Examples of these alkaline proteolytic enzymes which can be used in the method according to the invention are the proteases described in WO 92/17576, WO 89/06279, WO 91/00345, and PCT/DK93/00074.
Also, in regard to the dehairing step 3) reference should be made to the immunization of the hair as an important aspect of the invention. Reference can be made to Bibliotek des Leders, Band 2, Arbeiten der Wasserwerkstatt bei der Lederherstellung, 1988, Umschau Verlag, page 87-89. Thus, the immunization of the hair is a reaction, wherein the -S-S-bridge is converted to an -S-bridge in alkaline medium, whereby the hair is rendered insoluble in Na2S solution. Immunization is a potentially misleading term, which, however, is accepted in this field. Denaturation might be a better term. The aqueous phase in step 3) is identified as the dehairing float in this specification with claims. If the sulfide is added too early after step 3b), i.e. immediately after or shortly after step 3b), the remaining hair, which is still adhering to the hide, will be dissolved, and if the sulfide is added too late, i.e. after completion of the immunization, the hairs cannot longer be removed from the hides. However, the average worker in the art will know when to add the sulfide, on the basis of the instructions indicated in this specification with claims, i.e. as follows. As a guideline a preliminary dehairing experiment can be carried out, according to the invention, and all variable parameters can be noted. Between step 3b) and step 3c) samples can be taken out regularly, and for each sample it can be determined, if the hairs are immunized or not (if immunized, the hairs cannot be removed from the hides by addition of Na2S). It will be found that the first samples are not immunized, and that all samples beginning with a critical sample are immunized. The time corresponding to the sample immediately preceding the critical sample will be the ideal time for addition of the sulfide. Usually step 3c) is performed around 4-12 hours after step 3b), depending upon the kind and concentration of the base. Also, a guideline in regard to the time interval between step 3b) and 3c) can be extracted from the following examples. 0.12% of S", in relation to the dry hide weight or skin weight corresponds to 0.5% of a 60% Na2S solution or 0.3% of a 72% NaHS solution, the 0.5% and 0.3% being related to the dry hide weight or skin weight. Surprisingly it has been found that only small quantities of sulfide are necessary, and that the hair is recovered 100% as useful, undamaged hair without any environmental disadvantages, if the method is carried out as indicated above, especially if step 3c) is carried out at the time indicated, i.e. before the hairs are immunized by the base, preferably just before the hairs are immunized by the base. The Novo Nordisk product sheet "Examples of Application of NUE 0.6
MPX for dehairing of hides" (B 533a-GB 2000 Oct. 1989 NHS) describes a prior art dehairing process, in which an amount of 0.36% of S" (related to the dry weight of hides) is recommended. Usually, the process will not work satisfactorily with a smaller concentration of S". From Bibliotek des Leders, Band 2, Arbeiten der Wasserwerkstatt bei der Lederherstellung, 1988, Umschau Verlag, page 62-63 it appears that one of the classical dehairing methods comprises hair destruction, i.e. dissolution of the hair. This method is very disadvantageous from an environmental point of view. In the process according to the invention the hairs are not dissolved at all.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that a green fleshing is carried out between step 2) and 3). In this embodiment the following advantages are obtained: 1) the enzymatic action during the dehairing is improved due to the reduced amount of fat in the dehairing float and on the hides or skins, 2) the sewage water contains less fat and is thus more acceptable from an environmental point of view, 3) the fat removed during the green fleshing will not be exposed to sulfides and will thus exhibit a better quality, and 4) the necessary amount of S" in step 3c) will be less, in certain cases even 0.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3a) the amount of water added to the treated hides or skins is between 30 and 200% in relation to the dry weight of the hides or skins, preferably between 75 and 125% thereof. With an amount of water less than 30% the abrasion of the hides or skins will be damaging, and with an amount of water above 200% the mechanical impact will be too low, and also, the consumption of water will be undesirably high.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) the base is Ca(OH)2 or NaOH. In this manner the BOD5 is kept relatively low, in contradistinction to the case, when e.g. NH3 is used as the base. Also, Ca(OH)2 is even better than NaOH, because Ca(OH)2 cannot damage the hides if an overdose of Ca(OH)2 is accidentally used.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the alkaline proteolytic enzyme is the proteolytic enzyme producible by means of an alcalophilic Bacillus species. It has been found experimentally that an enzyme of this kind gives rise to a satisfactory dehairing.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the alkaline proteolytic enzyme exhibits a pH activity curve with a maximum above pH 9, according to the CPU activity determination method. In this manner a very satisfactory removal of the hairs is obtained.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) the base is added before the proteolytic enzyme. In this manner local, extremely high pH values are avoided, which might inactivate the alkaline protease.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3b) maximum 0.02% S" is added, in relation to the dry hide weight or the dry skin weight. In this embodiment the immunization will be somewhat delayed, and thus the enzymes will be able to influence the hairs over a longer period of time, and thus the dehairing will be more complete.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that in step 3c) the sulfide is Na2S or NaHS. Na2S or NaHS are the cheapest sulfides on the market, and no other sulfides perform better than Na2S or
NaHS.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the sulfide is added as late as possible before the immunization of the hairs. In this manner no hair at all is dissolved, and the maximum amount of hair can be collected.
A preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention comprises that the hairs are removed from the dehairing liquor by continuous filtration during the dehairing. If no continuous filtration is carried out the hairs will tend to adhere to the fatty tissue on the back of the hide or skin. In US 3,840,433 a dehairing method with a specially selected group of alkaline proteases is described. The final leather product resulting from this dehairing, however, exhibits a tendency towards grain damage and nubuckisation, in contradistinction to the leather product resulting from the dehairing method according to the invention. The method according to the invention will be illustrated by the following examples.
In the examples transportation times are included in the time schedule.
Thus, the interval between two consecutive times does not necessarily correspond to the duration of the treatment in question. All percentages are calculated in relation to the dry weight of hide or skin.
Figure imgf000008_0001
5 Both hides are clean. The bull hide is more fresh than the cow hide. The cow hide is more dry on the hair side than the bull hide. The bull hide is more dry on the flesh side than the cow hide. Both hides comprise a relatively small amount of fat.
0 h Soak
10 200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C
0.1% of Baymol FD (0.051 kg) (detergent) Start - 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
1 h Main soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C 15 " 1 ) 0.1 % of Baymol FD (0.051 kg) (detergent)
2) 0.5% of NH3 added as a 25% solution (0.250 kg)
3) 13 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 3.5 Be
20 135 h pH: 9.96
1 5 h Operation of drum set to 10 minutes of operation/20 minutes break (5 rev./minute)
13 h Green fleshing pH: 9.33; temperature: 28°C (measured) 25 Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 2.6 Be Weight of fleshed hide: 50.0 kg
15*° h Dehairing
75% of water at 28°C
0.7% of Ca(OH)2 on hide = 357 g
5 1545 h 80 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/6 seconds break (5 rev./minute) pH 12.27
0 Weakly initiative dehairing - pH 11.86
Dehairing proceeding well - pH 11.60 - 11.37
h pH 11.16
20°° h pH 10.87
2045 h Stop - The hides are taken out 5 All hairs are removed from the float
Added amount of water: 22.5 litres 1.3% of Ca(OH)2 on hides = 650 g 0.5% of Na2S = 250 g
21 ,s h Operation of drum set to 10 minutes of operation/20 minutes break (5 0 rev./minute)
2940 h Cow hide: fully dehaired. No stretch marks
Bull hide: fully dehaired. No stretch marks
Stop, pH 12.20
Figure imgf000010_0001
The hides were not quite as clean as in Example 1.
O h Soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C
0.1% of Baymol FD (0.052 kg) (detergent)
Start - 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 5 Be
( h Main soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C Order of addition:
1) 0.1% of Baymol FD (0.052 kg) (detergent)
2) 0.5% of Ca(OH)2 = 0.156 kg
3) 13 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
035 Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 0.8 Be pH: 11.83
Operation of drum set to 15 minutes of operation/15 minutes break (5 rev./minute)
9,5 h Green fleshing
Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 4.2 Be pH: 9.95
Temperature: 24°C
Weight of fleshed hide: 50 kg h Dehairing
75% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C 0.5% of Ca(OH)2 on hide (salted) = 262.5 g
1"° h 80 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
Figure imgf000011_0001
Stop - The hides are taken out All hairs are removed from the float Added amount of water: 25 litres (28°C) 0.2% of Ca(OH)2 on hide = 105 g
4* h Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/25 minutes break (5 rev./minute) pH 11.94 - 5 minutes after the pH was 11.86
s6 h pH 11.27; concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 1.6 Be Cow hide and bull hide fully dehaired
Concentration of salt, mainly NaCI: 1.8 Be Stop
Figure imgf000012_0001
5 Both hides look good.
0 h Soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C
0.1 % of Baymol FD (0.049 kg) (detergent)
Start - 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
10 100 h Main soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C Order of addition:
1) 0.1% of Baymol FD (0.049 kg) (detergent)
2) 0.3% of Ca(OH)2 = 0.147 kg
15 3) 13 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
1 ,5 h pH: 12.0
Operation of drum set to 15 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
0 δ h pH 10.0
The soak is stopped. Both hides have small spots showing initiative dehairing 5"" h Dehairing
75% of water with a temperature of approx. 28°C 0.5% of Ca(OH)2 on hide (salted) = 246 g
550 h 80 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the
5 alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute) pH 12.5
β∞ h pH 11.4
10 Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 minutes break (5 rev./minute)
12? h pH 10.1
Stop - The hides are taken out All hairs are removed from the float
15 1420 h Added amount of water: 12 litres (28°C)
2% of Ca(OH)2 on hide = 984 g
0.5% of Na2S on hide = 246 g pH > 12
Operation of drum set to 2 minutes of operation/4 minutes break (5 20 rev./minute)
21 " h pH value not measured
Cow hide fully dehaired Bull hide fully dehaired Stop
Figure imgf000014_0001
Both hides look good.
O h Soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 24°C
0.1% of Baymol FD (detergent)
0.01 % of Arazit KF (preservative)
5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (9 rev./minute)
1°° h Main soak
200% of water with a temperature of approx. 26°C Order of addition:
1 ) 0.3% of Na2CO3.10H2O
2) 0.1% of Baymol FD (detergent)
3) 0.01 % of Arazit KF (preservative)
1s h 4) 13 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576. pH: 9.1
Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (6 rev./minute)
6*° h pH: 8.2
The soak is stopped 6s6 h Dehairing
75% of water with a temperature of approx. 26°C 0.5% of Ca(OH)2
706 h 80 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the
5 alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
^ h pH 10.2
Stop - the hides are taken out
All hairs are removed and the float is changed
1400 h 100% of water with a temperature of 26°C
10 0.5% Na2S
14,0 h 2% of Ca(OH)2
l^ h pH: 12.25
Operation of drum set to 3 minutes of operation/30 minutes break (6 rev./minute)
I5 24°° h Stop
EXAMPLE 5
505 kg salted cow hide Total 505 kg
0 h Soak
5 200% of water with a temperature of approx. 25°C
0.1 % of Baymol AN (0.505 kg) (detergent) 0.01% of Arazit KF (0.0505 kg) (preservative) Start - 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
100 h Main soak
10 200% of water with a temperature of approx. 25°C
Order of addition:
1 ) 0.1 % of Baymol AN (0.505 kg) (detergent)
2) 0.3% of Na2C03 = 1.515 kg
3) 0.01 % of Arazit KF (0.0505 kg) (preservative)
15 4) 6 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 92/17576.
200 h pH: 8.8
Operation of drum set to 10 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute). 0.2% of Na2C03 (1.01 kg) was added.
20 400 h pH = 8.8
0.2% of Na2C03 (1.01 kg) was added.
7°° h pH 8.9
The soak is stopped. 7°° h Dehairing
100% of water with a temperature of approx. 25.5°C 0.5% of Ca(OH)2 (2.525 kg) 0.2% of Na2S (1.010 kg)
5 7°° h 37 mg of enzyme protein per kg of salted hide. The enzyme is the alkaline proteolytic enzyme described in Example 1 of WO 89/06279.
Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute) pH 12
10 8*° h pH 11.2
0.2% of Ca(OH)2 (1.01 kg)
1115 h pH 11.6
0.2% of Ca(OH)2 (1.01 kg)
Operation of drum: 10 minutes of operation/hour
15 14 h pH 11.5
0.1 % Ca(OH)2 (0.505 kg)
21°° h pH 10.8
Stop - The hide is taken out
All hairs are removed from the float
20 2100 h Added amount of water: 250 litres (15°C)
2% of Ca(OH)2 = 10 kg 0.5% of Na2S = 2.5 kg pH > 12 Operation of drum set to 5 minutes of operation/5 seconds break (5 rev./minute)
2130 h Added amount of water of 15°C: 50% (250 litres)
23,s h Rinsing with 200% of water (1010 kg) of 25°C
5 2330 h Fleshing
For a somewhat more detailed description of Example 5, reference is made to the below indicated table.
Figure imgf000019_0001
With pH electrode. The figures in paranthesis are measured with indicator paper The protease is the protease preparation described in Example 1 in WO 89/06279
Figure imgf000020_0001
With pH electrode. The figures in paranthesis are measured with indicator paper The protease is the protease preparation described in Example 1 in WO 89/06279
Figure imgf000021_0001
With pH electrode

Claims

1. Method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes, wherein
1) the hides or skins are soaked
2) the soaked hides or skins are exhibited to a main soak, and 3) the thus treated hides or skins are dehaired a) by addition of water and exposure to mechanical influence, whereby the water is added in an amount which provides satisfactory rubbing between the individual hides or skins, b) by simultaneous or arbitrarily sequential addition of a base in an amount which is sufficient for raising the pH of the dehairing liquor to between 9.0 and 12.5, and one or more alkaline proteolytic enzymes in an amount corresponding to between 10 and 150 mg of pure enzyme protein / kg of dry hide or skin, preferably between 20 and 50 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, most preferably between 30 and 40 mg of pure enzyme protein/kg of dry hide or skin, and c) by subsequent addition of an easily soluble sulfide in an amount of maximum 0.12% S~~ in relation to the hide weight or skin weight, before the hairs are immunized by the base, whereby the hairs are removed during the dehairing.
2. Method according to Claim 1 , wherein a green fleshing is carried out between step 2) and 3).
3. Method according to Claim 1 - 2, wherein in step 3a) the amount of water added to the treated hides or skins is between 30 and 200% in relation to the dry weight of the bovine hides, preferably between 75 and 125% thereof.
4. Method according to Claims 1 - 3, wherein in step 3b) the base is Ca(OH)2 or NaOH.
5. Method according to Claims 1 - 4, wherein the alkaline proteolytic enzyme is the proteolytic enzyme producible by means of an alcalophilic Bacillus
5 species.
6. Method according to Claims 1 - 5, wherein the alkaline proteolytic enzyme exhibits a pH activity curve with a maximum above pH 9, according to the CPU activity determination method.
7. Method according to Claims 1 - 6, wherein in step 3b) the base is 10 added before the proteolytic enzyme.
8. Method according to Claims 1 - 7, wherein in step 3b) also maximum 0.02% S" is added, in relation to the dry hide weight or the dry skin weight.
9. Method according to Claims 1 - 8, wherein in step 3c) the sulfide is Na2S or NaHS.
15 10. Method according to Claims 1 - 9, wherein the sulfide is added as late as possible before the immunization of the hairs.
11. Method according to Claims 1 - 10, wherein the hairs are removed from the dehairing liquor by continuous filtration during the dehairing.
PCT/DK1993/000283 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 Method for dehairing of hides or skins Ceased WO1994006942A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BR9306942A BR9306942A (en) 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 Process for removing hair from hides by means of enzymes
EP93919037A EP0660879A1 (en) 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 Method for dehairing of hides or skins
KR1019950700277A KR950702643A (en) 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 METHOD FOR DEHAIRING OF HIDES OR SKINS
JP6507708A JPH08504222A (en) 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 Method for epilation of animal skin or skin

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK921136A DK113692D0 (en) 1992-09-16 1992-09-16
DK1136/92 1992-09-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1994006942A1 true WO1994006942A1 (en) 1994-03-31

Family

ID=8101425

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/DK1993/000283 Ceased WO1994006942A1 (en) 1992-09-16 1993-08-31 Method for dehairing of hides or skins

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0660879A1 (en)
JP (1) JPH08504222A (en)
KR (1) KR950702643A (en)
BR (1) BR9306942A (en)
DK (1) DK113692D0 (en)
MX (1) MX9305631A (en)
WO (1) WO1994006942A1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996019590A1 (en) * 1994-12-21 1996-06-27 Novo Nordisk A/S Method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes
US6867032B2 (en) 1999-12-06 2005-03-15 Daiwa Kasei K.K. Enzymatic unhairing agent for use in tanning for producing leather and method for enzymatic unhairing treatment
WO2008122640A2 (en) 2007-04-09 2008-10-16 Novozymes A/S An enzymatic treatment of skin and hide degreasing
WO2011161135A1 (en) 2010-06-22 2011-12-29 Novozymes A/S Enzyme dehairing of skins and hides
IT201900006994A1 (en) 2019-05-20 2020-11-20 Biodermol Ambiente S R L Bacterial strains for industrial use
WO2025230818A1 (en) 2024-05-03 2025-11-06 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. Methods for dehairing animal skins and hides and formulations related to same

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3133002A (en) * 1961-08-08 1964-05-12 Roehm & Haas Gmbh Treatment of hides
WO1982003228A1 (en) * 1981-03-12 1982-09-30 Fekete Kalman An environment-protecting method for the liming of raw hides
US4960428A (en) * 1988-01-29 1990-10-02 Rohm Gmbh Method for liming skins and hides

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3133002A (en) * 1961-08-08 1964-05-12 Roehm & Haas Gmbh Treatment of hides
WO1982003228A1 (en) * 1981-03-12 1982-09-30 Fekete Kalman An environment-protecting method for the liming of raw hides
US4960428A (en) * 1988-01-29 1990-10-02 Rohm Gmbh Method for liming skins and hides

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1996019590A1 (en) * 1994-12-21 1996-06-27 Novo Nordisk A/S Method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes
AU693981B2 (en) * 1994-12-21 1998-07-09 Novo Nordisk A/S Method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes
US5834299A (en) * 1994-12-21 1998-11-10 Novo Nordisk A/S Method for dehairing of hides or skins by means of enzymes
US6867032B2 (en) 1999-12-06 2005-03-15 Daiwa Kasei K.K. Enzymatic unhairing agent for use in tanning for producing leather and method for enzymatic unhairing treatment
WO2008122640A2 (en) 2007-04-09 2008-10-16 Novozymes A/S An enzymatic treatment of skin and hide degreasing
WO2011161135A1 (en) 2010-06-22 2011-12-29 Novozymes A/S Enzyme dehairing of skins and hides
US9267182B2 (en) 2010-06-22 2016-02-23 Novozymes A/S Dehairing of skins and hides
US9856540B2 (en) 2010-06-22 2018-01-02 Novozymes A/S Dehairing of skins and hides
IT201900006994A1 (en) 2019-05-20 2020-11-20 Biodermol Ambiente S R L Bacterial strains for industrial use
WO2025230818A1 (en) 2024-05-03 2025-11-06 Buckman Laboratories International, Inc. Methods for dehairing animal skins and hides and formulations related to same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0660879A1 (en) 1995-07-05
BR9306942A (en) 1999-01-12
KR950702643A (en) 1995-07-29
JPH08504222A (en) 1996-05-07
MX9305631A (en) 1994-06-30
DK113692D0 (en) 1992-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4636222A (en) Enzymatic unhairing method
EP0326059A3 (en) Liming process for obtaining hair
US3966551A (en) Method for preparing tannable pelts from animal skins and hides
US9206486B2 (en) Method for tanning animal skins
US4294087A (en) Enzymatic method for hair recovery with concurrent opening of hide structure
EP2585618A1 (en) Enzyme dehairing of skins and hides
CN105603133B (en) A kind of raw material skin depilating method
US4548608A (en) Depilating composition and method
RU2052506C1 (en) Method of treatment of hide and depilated hide
EP0660879A1 (en) Method for dehairing of hides or skins
JPS59197500A (en) Wet dewaxing process for rawhide, grained pelt, pelt and wetblue
GB2054641A (en) Softening skins and hides
US6689172B1 (en) Auxiliary for liming and loosening hairs of animal skins
US20220347069A1 (en) Process for Dehairing and Liming of Hides, Skins or Pelts
US4581148A (en) Depilating composition and method
US4344762A (en) Soaking method
US20200024675A1 (en) Animal hide dehairing methods
JPH0533000A (en) Production of organic composition for chrome tanning
Cordon et al. Microbial and other enzymes as depilatory agents
RU2061046C1 (en) Method of enzymatic hide unhairing
US1812921A (en) Unhairing and bating of skins
WO2019112487A1 (en) Fish leather and method for producing fish leathers
SU1406172A1 (en) Method of treating cattle hides
DE2301591C3 (en) Process for the production of ready-to-tan pelts from animal hides and skins
Resort l0Sth Annual

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BR JP KR US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1993919037

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: US

Ref document number: 1995 381923

Date of ref document: 19950214

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1993919037

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1993919037

Country of ref document: EP