WO1994014083A1

WO1994014083A1 - Radar system

Info

Publication number: WO1994014083A1
Application number: PCT/NO1993/000184
Authority: WO
Inventors: Per-Arne Isaksen
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Individual
Priority date: 1992-12-07
Filing date: 1993-12-07
Publication date: 1994-06-23
Anticipated expiration: 1995-06-07
Also published as: AU5660994A; ATE168785T1; NO924707D0; CA2151061A1; NO177619C; DE69319926D1; NO924707L; DK0679263T3; HK1003541A1; NO177619B; ES2122222T3; JPH08505940A; EP0679263A1; US5663730A; JP2947935B2; EP0679263B1; DE69319926T2

Abstract

A radar system comprising a transmitter unit and a receiver unit for radar signals, a trigger unit for guiding the radar signals from the transmitter unit, an aerial unit for transmitting the radar signals from the transmitting unit and for receiving the reflected video signals, is characterized by a combination of the following features: that the transmitter and receiver unit of the radar system comprise two or more separate transmitters and receivers, that the transmitters and the receivers are triggered off by a common trigger, that the common trigger is arranged so as to trigger off each individual transmitter mutually in series during a sequence period, so that the transmitters produce signals with mutually distinct frequencies/characteristics, that the transmitters and receivers are connected to a common aerial, and that the individual receiver is matched to their own specific transmitter to be able to present the frequencies/characteristics of video signals in approximately the entire sequence period.

Description

RADAR SYSTEM

The present invention relates to a device of a radar sys- tern as indicated in the introduction to claim 1. The invention relates to an improvement of the radar systems as they are known today.

The navigational radar of today has not changed essentially for many years. Taking into account that the clarity of the picture has the greatest significance in bad weather, one might be tempted to say that the majority of radar sets are of relatively poorer quality than they were earlier.

Some of the background for this is that when the radar has a specification for a given purpose, one must compromise, i.e. that by providing radar systems one can obtain the required information with the necessary preci¬ sion, assuming that one is willing to renounce other information, and to accept higher weights, need of space and costs.

It is a known fact that shipping has increased con¬ siderably in recent years. Moreover the speed of certain types of vessels, and particularly passenger vessels (catamarans and pleasure crafts etc) has greatly increased. Many of these vessels can reach a speed of up to 60 knots. Taking these facts into consideration, and the increase of speed boats in recent years presents a corresponding need for further development and improvement of radar sets.

During the last ten years there have been many acci- dents, or near accidents, which can partly be blamed on poor radar systems onboard. This is even more serious, as it is well known that the weather conditions at times may make certain types of radar sets almost unusable. A radar set can therefore represent a security risk in itself. If we summarize the various factors influencing the radar, the prementioned increase in the number of vessels, and their speed, it is clearly necessary to stipulate more stringent requirements for the main function of the radar, i.e. to furnish the pilot of a vessel, for example, with the possibility to see what has importance for safe navi¬ gation, particularly in bad weather conditions, such as rain, fog, heavy sea, and so forth, and in narrow waters.

Thus there is a considerable need for further techni¬ cal development of the radar with the object of improving the picture (video) quality.

A number of parameters exist determining the quality of a radar picture. These parameters include the transmit¬ ting effect, the length of the pulse, the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) , the sensitivity and dynamics of the receiver, the signal processing in the receiver, the sig¬ nal processing in the display, the type of aerial and its size and rotation speed. These are known, conditions which on a technological basis determine the quality of the radar picture. With reference to the previously known techniques, and problems encumbering todays radar, one shall refer to an article written by Bjørn Hansen and published in "Norsk Nautisk Almanakk for 1993", pages 552-561, entitled "90- arenes navigasjonsradar", and to the US-patent Nos. 2.817.832, and 4.197.540.

In said US-patent No. 2.817.832, (24 December 1957) a radar set is described. The enclosed fig. 1 is a diagram showing the sequences between the transmitters (TX1-TX2- TX3) and receivers (RX1-RX2-RX3) with which this radar set is constructed. The upper portion of the diagram indicates the order and distance between the transmitter pulses. It will be apparent that the transmitter fires pulses in the mentioned order (TX1-TX2-TX3) . The lower portion of the diagram shows the situation of the receivers (RX1-RX2- RX3) , that is to say the periods of time wherein the receivers are active (open) or closed. It is evident that the certain receiver (RX) is cut off (i.e. open) during the entire sequence cycle. As men¬ tioned in said patent the individual receiver opens for a limited sequence time only, in that the sequence in the given occasion is only 1/3 of the sequence time of the respective TX. Furthermore it is stated in the US-patent that the segments are divided into 0-25 NM, thereafter follows 25-50 NM and finally 50-75 NM. It follows there¬ fore that the radar set, according to US-patent No. 2.817.832, can only see one segment at a time. If the radar set according to US-patent No. 2.817.832 manages to increase its total number of transmitters/ receivers (TRX) this will lead to the field being even more reduced in relation to the sequence and number of the TRX's. US patent No. 4.197.540 deals with a CW-radar. This proposed radar system could however, not be realized because of the current klystron which could only transmit with limited effect. In the radar sets of the ANSPN-5 type, for example, a system produced by RCA in the USA, a klystron of the type 2-K25, was used. Several klystrons are used in one and the same radar set, and every trans¬ mitter includes its own specific receiver. If one looks at the truth table of US-patent certificate 4.197.540 one will find that RX1 will always be closed in the transmit- ting time of TX1, RX2 will always be closed in the trans¬ mitting time of TX2 and so forth. This means that RX1 and RX2 are open, when TX3 transmits, RX2 and RX3 are open when TX1 transmits. Thus, for example, the consequence of this is that if there are, three TRX's, each of the trans¬ mitters TX will transmit 1/3 of a sequence distance. If 6 ΝM are displayed, for example, the individual TX will transmit the equivalent in time to 2 ΝM. This means that the RX's will always be turned off sequentially in 1/3 of a transmitting sequence, that is to say in 2ΝM in accord¬ ance with the example.

The purpose of the invention is to obtain a new and considerably improved radar compared with those which are known today.

The arrangement of the radar system in accordance with the present invention is characterised by the radar system's transmitter and receiver unit comprising two or more separate transmitters and receivers, that the trans¬ mitters and the receivers are triggered by a common trig¬ ger, that the common trigger is arranged so as to trigger off each individual transmitter mutually dependent in series during a sequence period, so that the transmitters produce signals with mutually distinct frequencies/- characteristics and that the transmitters and receivers are connected to a common aerial, and that the individual receiver is matched to each respective specific transmit¬ ter to be able to present the frequencies/characteristics of the video signals in approximately the entire sequence period.

In accordance with a preferred implementation of the radar system according to the invention, each transmitter and the appurtenant receiver forms an independent radar set as part of a system whereby the radar set, without being dependent on the other transmitters and receivers, produces radar signals and receives video signals.

Additional specified and preferred embodiments of the radar system in accordance with the invention will appear from the subsequent dependent patent claims 3-9.

The radar system of the invention, is particularly suitable for the navigation of vessels. By this connection of two or more individual radar sets where one uses a common aerial one has accomplished the following on the condition that the trigger part cir¬ culates the firing of the individual magnetron. The transmitting effect can be retained, simultan¬ eously as the pulse repetition frequency (PRF) can be increased. In accordance with the invention, each individ¬ ual transmitter transmits with different frequency. The frequency distance are separated and must equal the mini- mum bandwidth of the individual receiver, in practice, this is achieved by adding 5 MHZ to maintain good channel separation. Furthermore repeated echoes have always been an enemy to all pulsating radar sets. With the present solution of spreading the frequency for both transmitter and receiver one can indirectly use repetitive echoes, this relating to the sum of PRF. This means that even if one uses extremely high PRF, one will be able to present a radar picture which "looks" further than the PRF alone could imply. The pulse length is chosen in relation to the choice of PRF and the aerial's rotation speed. If one transmits with an extremely high PRF it is also advantageous to be able to proportionally reduce the pulse length. This re¬ duction of the pulse length which preferably is effected, gives two possibilities. Firstly, if the relative trans¬ mitting effect is retained, the life expectancy of the magnetron will increase correspondingly. The second possi¬ bility, if the pulse length is reduced, the effect can increase correspondingly without the life expectancy of the magnetron becoming shorter.

These two points refer to the life expectancy of the magnetron being determined i.a. by the average effect.

In order to explain the invention in greater detail, reference is made to the enclosed diagrams, wherein; Fig. 1 shows a diagram of the sequences between the transmitters (TX1-TX2-TX3) and the receivers (RX1-RX2-RX3) in accordance with the technical position as stated in US patent No . 4 . 197 . 540 .

Fig. 2 shows schematic the total layout of the trans¬ mitter and receiver part of the radar system according to the invention. Fig. 3 shows the trigger unit in accordance with fig. 2.

Fig. 4 shows the modulator and transmitter units in accordance with fig. 2.

Fig. 5 shows a specific embodiment of the pulse shaper unit of the transmitter unit.

Fig. 6 shows the wave guide and scanner units in accordance with fig. 2.

Fig. 7 shows the receiver unit in accordance with fig. 2. Fig. 8 shows the sequence-diagram for the pulse sequence outlet from the pre-trigger 20 and the main trig¬ ger 22 in accordance with fig. 3.

Fig. 9 shows the sequence-diagram for the pulsese- quence inlet to the receiver unit. The enclosed fig. 1 shows a diagram of the sequences between the transmitters (TX1-TX2-TX3) and the receivers (RX1-RX2-RX3) according to the previously mentioned US patent No. 2.817.832, of which the radar set is con¬ structed. The diagram will not be referred to further, as it is previously mentioned in this description. It will, however, be referred to in conjunction with a comparison between the corresponding sequence diagram for the radar set according to the present invention.

As shown in fig. 2 the radar system according to the invention, includes a trigger-unit 10, a modulator, and transmitter unit 12, an aerial-unit (wave guide and scan¬ ner unit) 14, a receiver unit 16 and a signal processing unit, preferably of the type ARPA/REX which will be explained later. The explanation of the trigger unit 10 shown in fig. 3, is based on a specific example where 3 transmitters and 3 receivers are used, and where the pulse repetition frequency PRF is fixed from the aerial and set to 9000 hz (i.e. the PRF is 3000 from each transmitter) .

As shown in fig. 3 the trigger unit 10 includes a pre-trigger 20 and a main trigger 22. The exit TP1 from the pre-trigger 20 can, for example, oscillate with a pulse repetition frequency of 9000 hz as shown diagram- matically in the figure referring to TP1.

The output from the pre-trigger 20 feeds the entrance to the main-trigger 22. The main-trigger 22 divides the pre-trigger signal to the three points A, B, and C. The distribution will take place in an established sequence. The pulse frequency from the pre-trigger 20 is divided by 3 and gives an out-going pulse frequency for each of the main-trigger outputs 22A, 22B, 22C of 3000 hz, when the PRF equals 9000 hz. Reference is made to the diagram in fig. 8.

The explanation of the transmitter-unit 14 which is shown in fig.4 is based on the use of the three transmit¬ ters 22A, 22B, 22C as shown in fig. 3. The transmitter unit 14 comprises three modulators 24, 26, 28 and three transmitters TR1,TR2,TR3. Each of the three modulators 24, 26, and 28 is connected to an individual transmitter TR1,TR2,TR3. The exits E,F,G from the transmitters are connected to a common aerial through the respective circulators SI, S2, and S3. The out-going frequencies from the transmitters differ in relation to each other. The pulse repetition frequency PRF and the sequence to the aerial correspond with the exit signal A,B,C produced by the trigger-unit. Reference is made to fig. 5 which shows a specific embodiment of the pulse-shaper unit of the transmitter- part in the radar system of the invention.

The coupling of fig. 5 represents each of the trans¬ mitter parts TR1-TR3 in fig. 4. The entrance represents a pulse-transformer Tl, whilst the output comprises a trans¬ mitter magnetron V3. Between the pulse-transformer Tl point 4 and the cathode entrance on the magnetron V3, a diode Dl is coupled in series with the relay RL1. The cathode of diode Dl is coupled to the pulse-transformer Tl. A guided diode V2 is coupled in parallel with the relay RL1 which may comprise a triode, a tetrode or a thyristor. This dirigible diode V2 has its anode facing the magnetron V3 whilst the cathode faces the anode of the diode Dl. An additional guided diode VI is coupled between the V2 diode's cathode and point 3 on the pulse-trans¬ former Tl, i.e. on the earth side of the magnetron (cathode) the VI and V2 cathodes are coupled together. A relay RL2 is coupled to the anode of VI.

The notion for guiding the two diodes V1,V2, is that the given pulse from the pulse-transformer Tl will either lead through V2 to the cathode of magnetron V3, or be diverted via VI to earth. The guiding takes place by means of the separate guiding circuit which is shown on the bottom of fig. 2. In this figure DY includes a delay cir¬ cuit. Ul, U2, U3 and U4 are NAND-gates. MD1 consists of a multivib. and a variable delay gate, time set 5-40 ns. The guiding circuit is connected as follows: the output from the delay circuit DY branches off and leads to the entrance of NAND-gate Ul and entrance MD1, respectively (multivib./variable delay port) . The output MD1 is carried forward to the entrance of NAND-gate U2. NAND-gates Ul and U2 are carried forward to their own separate entrance in NAND-gate U3. The output from U3 branches off to the con¬ necting point Al and entrance NAND-gate U4, respectively. The exit from U4 is carried forward to the connecting point Bl. The connection points Al and Bl are connected between the grids of the diodes VI and V2 via the connect¬ ing points A and B as shown on the figure.

The adjustment of a transmitted signal pulse to the magnetron V3 takes place as follows:

In rest position.

The exit DY and MD1 is logically 1. The output Ul and U2 are logically 0. The output U3 is logically 1. The exit U4 is logically 0. That is to say that Al holds A positive and VI in saturation, whilst V2 is cut off.

Explanation. The positive trigger into DY for DY's output negative after 5-10 ns. MD1 has an inner delay 0-40 ns. and main¬ tains MD1 output in the delay time logically 1.

Situation 1. After DY's output has become negative, the Ul output becomes positive and makes Al negative and Bl positive. VI cuts off and V2 becomes saturated.

Situation 2. After completion of situation 1, the delay time of MD1 will make the output U2 positive. This results in Al becoming positive and Bl becoming negative. This means that VI becomes saturated and V2 cuts off. MD1 will not change its logical state before it has reached 500 ns. DY is reset when the trigger has become negative.

The switch system outlined on top of figure 5 will function as follows, guided by the circuit at the bottom of the figure. The positive moving pulse entering into the pulse-transformer builds up point 4 negative. We ensure that in the elapsed time period to build up the negative voltage in point 4, point 3 is linked to point 4. The tetrode V2 is at the same time cut off and keeps the magnetron shut out from the circuit. At the moment the point 4 of the pulse transformer has attained its maximum negative voltage VI switches to cut off and simultaneously V2 becomes saturated. The negative-moving pulse that is now being led into the magnetron has extremely steep lead¬ ing edges (the steepness is measured to less than 5 ns) . For the pulse which is now led into the magnetron having the shortest possible duration (adjustable from 30 to 10 ns) it is imperative that the tetrodes are restored to their normal positions within the stated time. This is because the transmitter pulse should finish with the steepest possible leading edge (Example - for tetrode choice for a transmitter effect up to 35 KW (nominal effect 4CW 25,000A. However, since the nominal effect is considerably less, much cheaper tubes/thyristors can be used. Normally this would involve effects from 45-100 W nominal effect in a relatively powerful navigational transmitter) .

It is possible that the pulse length can be decreased by less time than previously mentioned, by using the same coupling of triodes, tetrodes or thyristors as shown in figure 5, but differ in that switches are substituted with primed-TR-cells. The switching itself must take place in the wave-guide. The switching then occurs between the aerial and a dummy-load. This solution may give pulse lengths of a duration of down to 4-5 ns. The gain would be of little use. This type of coupling is also expensive as it requires expensive solutions for the construction and composition of the wave-guide. The explanation of the aerial unit (the wave-guide and scanner-unit) which is outlined in figure 6, is related to the example with three transmitters 30,32,34 and the three respective receivers RX1, RX2, RX3. The signals E, F, G from the transmitters TR1, TR2, TR3 are fed to the scanner 30 through the circulators SI, S2,S3.

The sequence and the PRF from the scanners are the same as the output from the transmitter unit. The TR-cells 32, 34 and 36 are closed (cut off) in unison with the PRF, in that the these signals are transmitted via their respect- ive connections 38, 40 and 42. This means that all TR- cells are cut off simultaneously, i.e. in the time span as the transmitter transmits signals to the scanner 30.

For the aerial one can use either a parabolic aerial or a slotted wave guide. On a purely technical basis the parabolic aerial is better than the slotted wave guide. On the other hand the very best alternative would be a totally parabolic aerial. A totally parabolic aerial can only transmit and receive in a limited vertical and hori¬ zontal area (pencil beam) . There is a considerable advan¬ tage in channelling most of the power in a thin circular beam. This means that a relatively low cloud covering with a relatively high rain content will not affect the func¬ tioning of the radar. Another benefit is that one can use all advantages with regard to polarisation technology as a means of a clutter function and to a certain extent, as a remedy against interference/jamming. On the other hand, this type of aerial would be very expensive as it must be gyro-stabilized at all levels. This solution is better suited for military purposes.

The receiver unit 16 (see figure 7) is made up of three separate receivers RX1, RX2 RX3. Each receiver is connected to its respective TR-cell 32,34,36 (see figure 6) via connections H, I, and J. The receivers RX1, RX2, RX3 are syntonized in frequencies corresponding to their respective transmitters. However the frequency dispersal, that is to say the distance between the receivers (on account of the frequencies given out by the transmitters) is so large that the receiver only "sees" video signals from its own specific transmitter.

According to the invention it is preferred that each receiver feeds each individual radar-extractor (ARPA) . In accordance with the most preferred implementation of the invention, the receivers are simultaneously coupled to a common extractor. This, so as to utilize the potential that lies in the added quantity of information inherent in this construction. As one, in accordance with the invention uses high transmitter effects, the signal processing in the receiver part, should start as soon as possible. This means that signal processing should start in or just after the TR- cell. This is, so as to avoid driving the receiver into saturation from echoes entering from relatively closely situated objects. Since the transmitter pulse has an extremely steep leading edge of the transmitting pulse itself, the TR-cells should be primed. This is also because, in this case, the switching in a TR-cell operates too slow, (we refer to the characteristics of a TR-cell) . If now the rotation of the aerial is caused to stop and one analyses the video signal exit from each individ¬ ual receiver RX1,RX2,RX3, the following will be seen: the video signal from RX2 is delayed in relation to RX1. The video signal from RX3 is delayed in relation to RX2. The delay is in accordance with the aforementioned sequence, as described in the truth-table in figure 8. Said figure 8 shows the sequence diagram for the pulse sequence exit from the pre-trigger 20 and the main trigger (as in figure 3.). The top line in figure 8 shows TPl, i.e. the pattern for the total pulse transmittance from the transmitter unit 14, while the three bottom lines show the pulse transmittance from each of the individual transmitters A,

B, and C. The index numbers 0, 1, 2 , show the pulse number from each of the transmitters. The pulse trans- mittances are indicated with upward directed lines. Figure 9 shows the sequence diagram for the pulse sequence entrance of the pulses RX1 K., RX2 L. and RX3 M to the receiver unit. The top line of the figure shows TPl, i.e. the sequences for the delivered signals from the transmitter as shown in figure 4. (see also figure 8). The bottom three lines show the opening sequences as well as the closing (cut off) of the receivers for the reception of the pulses during the time period where the transmit¬ ters emit pulses considered in relation to TPl. After an introductory starting period one sees that all the receiv- ers are open, except for the period where the transmitters produce pulses. The cut off is indicated by vertical lines. The diagram shows in greater detail that RX1 K (receiver RX1 K opens first in the consecutive order of the receivers. This opening takes place when RP1 produces the first pulse. The opening of the receiver RX1 occurs, therefore, at the same moment as the transmitter TX1 has emitted its transmitter pulse. When pulse number 2 arises in TPl, the receiver RX1 closes (simultaneously TX2 starts transmitting) . When the transmitter TX2 has transmitted its transmitter pulse the receivers RX1 and RX2 open. This means that the receivers RX1 and RX2 receive video signals simultaneously, but the video signals which are supplied to the receiver, are displaced with respect to time corresponding to the elapsed time between the first and second pulses given by TPl (1/9000 sec.) When sequence pulse number 3 in TPl arises, the receivers RX1 and RX2 close (simultaneously TX3 starts transmitting) . When the transmitter TX3 has transmitted its transmitter pulse all receivers open. This means that the receivers receive video signals simultaneously, but the video signals which are supplied to the receiver, are displaced with respect to time. The time between the sec¬ ond and third pulses given by TPl (1/9000 sec) determines the time difference between the video signal arising in the receivers RX2 and RX3. As shown in figures 7 and 9, we have the same video signal in all the receivers, but the video signals are displaced with respect to time, equivalent to the given example PRF of 9000 hz. Furthermore we see that the receivers are closed (cut off) corresponding to the PRF of 9000 hz. The point in time for the cut off of the receiver corresponds with the closed state of the TR-cells 32,34,36 (figure 6.). It is undesirable that this closed state arises at the same time related to AT0 (the first pulse from A) , ATI (the second pulse from A) , AT2 (the third pulse from A), etc. In order to avoid this, it will according to the invention, be expedient to wobble the trigger outputs from the main trigger in relation to each other. The variation time from the main trigger should be larger than the receivers cut off time. The reason why it may be expedient to effect said wobbling, is that the ARPA/ radar extractors should have the best conditions possible to be able to see optional objects in the field, which would be "blind" if the trig¬ ger pulses were completely synchronized in relation to each other. When the multiple echoes are presented on a display, one or a plurality of areas will be without any information. The width of the field is, however, not greater than the transmitter pulse duration. In practice this means that one will have a circle without any infor¬ mation which constitutes the minimum of 1 ms. The explana¬ tion for this lies in the TR-cells relatively slack flank after the keep alive voltage and/or the transmitting pulse has ceased. This "blind" field can be avoided to a certain extent by wobbling the PRF between the individual trans¬ mitters.

The off-centring can be brought about and used in a completely different way than earlier. As mentioned previ¬ ously the radar picture will have a multiplied density of information. For example, this permits off-centring out to 6ΝM, at the same time as the radar screen scale is set to 0.25 NM. By using two separate displays many possibilities and applications exist. One can for example, "zoom" into an area that requires closer attention, and at the same time as valuable information around ones own vessel, is available.

One may for example, allow a the radar extractor (ARPA) to be fed with information exclusively from the zoomed-in area. By leaving the extractor to function auto¬ matically it will be able to automatically signalize, of any occurring movement in the zoomed area.

An ARPA/radar extractor is a computer in which video signals are processed digitally and which in this way may sample the signals, i.e. calculate course, speed, and angle speed. The conditions for the parameters may be changed both manually and automatically. This signal pro¬ cessing technology is well known. If we isolate the TRX units from each other, they may be considered as individually independent radar units, and function as such, (confer with claim 2) . The manner in which the system mutually work does not differ from other radar units where the same coupling is given in a compar¬ able block diagram. This is conditional upon the current TRX being conveyed to the trigger. If we examine the block diagram as a whole, the prin¬ ciple mode of operation of the individual TRX is still the same as other radar units.

The feature which makes the coupling particularly special is the cooperation carried out by the individual TRXs. Said cooperation between the TRX's is distributed by the trigger. The sum total of information that derives from the RX's is the result of this cooperation.

A.- The triggers output trigger each individual transmit- ter in predetermined sequences.

B.- PRF is set to 3000 (based on one transmitter) . C- The sequence effects a delay of the individual TRX with regard to time which corresponds to 1/3 of the PRF, in relation to each other. D.- There are three receivers and transmitters.

As the circuit has only one common aerial, the example will give us a PRF of 9000 fixed from an aerial.

Since the transmitters mutually do not work at the same frequency there is a corresponding frequency deviation of the receivers. The receivers are syntonized to their respective transmitters.

If we fulfil the previously mentioned parameter we will have a radar set operating with a PRF of 9000 (fixed from an aerial) but the choice of scale for the radar set will be comparative with a radar set which operates with

PRF of 3000. This results in a threefold increase in the amount of information.

SOME AREAS OF USE.

The construction of a radar set, as described in the present invention has clear advantages over the more cur- rent radar set construction. As the detection range of the radar set neither relies on, or is determined by the pulse repetition frequency PRF, it also indirectly solves other important parameters. The rotation speed of the aerial is partly PRF dependent. This means that by increasing the

PRF, the relative rotation speed of the aerial may also be increased. This increase in PRF and rotation speed of the aerial will on a technical basis, increase the amount of video-information. This situation with increased PRF and increased aerial rotation gives two considerable advan¬ tages for an ARPA/REX.

- The first advantage relies in the fact that one obtains a relative increase of pulse to pulse correlation.

- The second advantage is that one obtains a relative increase of scan to scan correlation.

These advantages determine the possibilities for the ARPA/REX to update a radar picture with speed and preci¬ sion. It has been demonstrated in trials that the speed of a target, and a deviation of both velocity and angle-speed could be registered with an improved time from 60 seconds (with an ordinary radar) and down to 2-4 seconds (for the disclosed radar in accordance with the invention) . (These points apply to given specific conditions and specific characteristics and should therefore be considered as relative values.)

For safe navigation, where vessels operate in rela¬ tively high speeds, it can be asserted, on a purely tech¬ nical level, that this construction of radar set will represent a considerable improvement. Said radar construc- tion will produce a radar picture to a navigator which both in terms of time and video information, is far more correct than earlier.

On the other hand said radar construction may be adapted to comply with "The International Maritime Organ- ization" (IMO) requesting vessels over a certain size having a minimum of two radar sets. This is achieved by using two parallel aerials where the switching between the aerials is effected mechanically in wave guide. This is more economical related to the request for two radar sets, and at the same time one may retain the technical improve¬ ments of the video information. By relatively increasing the PRF and the rotation speed of the aerial, it can be advantageous to shorten the length of the pulse compared with an ordinary radar.

By connecting two or more transmitters and receivers to a common aerial where the transmitters transmit with different frequencies, as in accordance with the inven¬ tion, the following can be achieved:

A: o essential loss of transmitter effect.

B: Extremely high PRF, for example 8000-16000 pulses per second.

C: No reduction of the theoretical range.

D: If point B is utilized it could be expedient to reduce the pulse length (down to, and less than or equal to 12.5 ns.) This decrease of the pulse length involves a positive effect on the average output supply of the transmitter. As a consequence of high PRF, the rotation of the aerial should be variable from 30 to 60 rpm. In practice it has been shown that aerial rotation of 45-55 rpm involves great positive consequences for the picture presentation and the work environment of an ARPA display.

The construction in itself opens up the possibility of increasing the amount of information to the display in threefold (depending upon the number of interconnected units) . The TRX's may operate separately so as to satisfy requirements and request for two or more radar sets.

It should be appreciated that one is not limited to the establishment of three transmitters as shown in the present example according to figures 2 and 4. That is to say, the expression "two or more" as it is applied here means that 2, 3 or any greater number of transmitters can be used in the radar system. This depends entirely on what is deemed to be most appropriate and practical.

Claims

P A T E N T C L A I M S.

1. Radar system comprising a transmitter unit and a receiver unit for radar signals, a trigger unit for guid- ing the radar signals from the transmitter unit, an aerial unit for transmitting the radar signals from the transmit¬ ting unit and for receiving the reflected video signals, characterized in that the transmitter and receiver unit of the radar system comprising two or more separate transmitters and receivers, that the transmitters and the receivers are triggered off by a common trigger, that the common trigger is arranged so as to trigger off each individual transmitter mutually in series during a sequence period, so that the transmitters produce sig¬ nals with mutually distinct frequencies/characteristics, that the transmitters and receivers are connected to a common aerial, and that the individual receiver is matched to its own specific transmitter to be able to present the frequencies/characteristics of video signals in approxi¬ mately the entire sequence period.

2. Radar system in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that each transmitter and the correspon¬ ding receiver forms a selfcontained radar set included in a system wherein the radar set, without being dependent of the other transmitters and receivers, produces radar sig- nals and receives video signals.

3. Radar system in accordance with claim 1 and 2, characterized in that the receivers are open for receiving video signals in the total sequence period with the excep- tion of the time periods when the transmitters transmit.

4. Radar system in accordance with any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the transmitters comprise their own magnetron which transmits with different fre¬ quencies.

5. Radar system in accordance with claim 4, character¬ ized in that the distance in frequency between the signals from each magnetron corresponds at least to the band width of the single receiver, and the distance corresponds pre¬ ferably to the sum of the band width plus 5 MHz.

6. Radar system in accordance with any of the preceding claims, characterized in that each receiver comprises a radar extractor (ARPA) , and/or a common extractor is pro¬ vided.

7. Radar system in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the signals of the transmitters are wobbled.

8. Radar system in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that the trigger triggers off the modu¬ lators of the transmitters in a circular cyclic sequence (figure 3) .

9. Radar system in accordance with any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the radar system comprises 2, 3 or a higher number of transmitters/receivers.

10. Use of the radar system in accordance with claims 1-9 for vessel navigation.