WO1997027308A1 - Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants - Google Patents

Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1997027308A1
WO1997027308A1 PCT/US1997/001443 US9701443W WO9727308A1 WO 1997027308 A1 WO1997027308 A1 WO 1997027308A1 US 9701443 W US9701443 W US 9701443W WO 9727308 A1 WO9727308 A1 WO 9727308A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
gene
drul
plant
promoter
dna
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US1997/001443
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jill Anne Kellogg
Richard Keith Bestwick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Exelixis Plant Sciences Inc
Original Assignee
Exelixis Plant Sciences Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Exelixis Plant Sciences Inc filed Critical Exelixis Plant Sciences Inc
Priority to AU18466/97A priority Critical patent/AU712460B2/en
Priority to JP9527109A priority patent/JP2000503848A/en
Priority to EP97904071A priority patent/EP0877813A1/en
Publication of WO1997027308A1 publication Critical patent/WO1997027308A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216—Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01H—NEW PLANTS OR NON-TRANSGENIC PROCESSES FOR OBTAINING THEM; PLANT REPRODUCTION BY TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES
    • A01H5/00—Angiosperms, i.e. flowering plants, characterised by their plant parts; Angiosperms characterised otherwise than by their botanic taxonomy
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8209—Selection, visualisation of transformants, reporter constructs, e.g. antibiotic resistance markers
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216—Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • C12N15/8222—Developmentally regulated expression systems, tissue, organ specific, temporal or spatial regulation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216—Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • C12N15/8222—Developmentally regulated expression systems, tissue, organ specific, temporal or spatial regulation
    • C12N15/823—Reproductive tissue-specific promoters
    • C12N15/8235—Fruit-specific

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the identification and characterization of tissue and/or stage specific plant promoters and compositions and metiiods employing such promoters.
  • Mullis, K.B., et al. U.S. Patent No. 4,683,195, issued 28 July 1987.
  • Mullis, K.B. U.S. Patent No. 4,683,202, issued 28 July 1987.
  • promoters useful for the expression of selected genes in plants are now available (Zhu, et al, 1995; Ni, et al., 1995). These promoters have been used to drive the expression of foreign (or heterologous) genes in plants. In most cases, the 5' non ⁇ coding regions of the genes (i.e., regions immediately 5 * to the coding region) have been used to generate chimeric genes. These regions are often referred to as promoter or transcriptional regulatory sequences. Promoters useful for the expression of a selected nucleic acid sequence in plants can be derived from plant DNA or from other sources, for example, plant viruses. In most cases, it has been demonstrated that sequences up to about 500-1500 bases allow regulated expression of genes under their control.
  • heterologous genes or selected sequences of genes in transgenic plants has typically involved the use of constitutive promoters.
  • Exemplary plant promoters include the following: 35S Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV 35S), mannopine synthase, and octopine synthase (ocs).
  • CaMV 35S 35S Cauliflower Mosaic Virus
  • mannopine synthase mannopine synthase
  • octopine synthase octopine synthase
  • the present invention includes a promoter that allows high-level, tissue specific expression of nucleic acid sequences placed under its regulation.
  • Chimeric genes of the present invention have a DNA sequence encoding a product of interest under the transcriptional control of a dru promoter.
  • the DNA sequence is typically heterologous to the promoter and is operably linked to the promoter to enable expression of the product.
  • Exemplary products include, but are not limited to S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase, aminocyclopropane-1 -carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ACC oxidase antisense molecule, ACC synthase antisense molecule, ACC oxidase cosuppression molecule, ACC synthase cosuppression molecule, thaumatin, sucrose phosphate synthase and lycopene cyclase.
  • ACC aminocyclopropane-1 -carboxylic acid
  • the promoters of the present invention can be used to reduce ethylene production in fruit cells.
  • the DNA sequence can correspond to a pathogenesis related gene, such as polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP), glucanase and chitinase.
  • PGIP polygalacturonase inhibiting protein
  • the promoter of the present invention can be obtained from a gene homologous to a raspberry drul gene or from the drul raspberry gene itself.
  • An exemplary drul promoter sequence is SEQ ID NO:22. Smaller fragments of such a promoter region may be derived from this sequence, where die smaller fragments are effective to regulate expression of a DNA sequence under their control.
  • the present invention also includes the use of any of the above chimeric genes to generate a plant transformation vector.
  • Such vectors can be used in any plant cell transformation method, including, Agrobacterium-based methods, electroporation, microinjection, and microprojectile bombardment. These vectors may form part of a plant transformation kit. Other components of the kit may include, but are not limited to, reagents useful for plant cell transformation.
  • the present invention includes a plant cell, plant tissue, transgenic plant, fruit cell, whole fruit, seeds or calli containing any of the above-described chimeric genes.
  • the promoters described herein are employed in a method for modifying ripening fruit of a fruit bearing plant.
  • transgenic plants containing the chimeric gene of d e present invention are grown to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit.
  • the chimeric gene encodes a product capable of reducing ethylene biosynthesis when expressed in plant cells (e.g., S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase, aminocyclopropane-1 -carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ACC oxidase antisense molecule, ACC synthase antisense molecule, ACC oxidase cosuppression molecule, ACC synthase cosuppression molecule).
  • Fruit produced by these transgenic plants have a modified ripening phenotype.
  • a modified ripening phenotype typically refers to an alteration of the rate of ripening of a transgenic fruit relative to corresponding (i.e., non-transgenic) wild-type fruit.
  • the invention includes a method for producing a transgenic fruit-bearing plant.
  • the chimeric gene of the present invention typically carried in an expression vector allowing selection in plant cells, is introduced into progenitor cells of selected plant. These progenitor cells are then grown to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit.
  • the method may further comprise isolation of a drul promoter by the following steps:
  • the present invention includes isolation of a drul promoter by the steps just described.
  • Figure 1 presents representative results of polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins.
  • FIGS. 2A and 2B schematically represent the Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Re ⁇ action (RT-PCR; Kawasaki, et al, 1989; Wang, etal, 1990) cloning of die raspberry drul gene.
  • Figures 3A and 3B present the genomic DNA sequence of the drul gene. Indicated in the figures are a CAAT box, TATA box, ATG start codon, two exons, an intron, splicing sites, a stop codon and poly-adenylation sites.
  • Figure 4 presents a schematic representation of the gene organization and protein structure of drul.
  • Figure 5 presents a Kyte-Doolittle hydrophilicity plot ofthe coding sequence o drul.
  • the hydrophilicity window size 7.
  • Figure 6 shows the results of RNA dot blot analysis of drul RNA expression in raspberry leaf and receptacle. RNA was isolated from green, mature green, breaker & orange/ripe raspberries (corresponding to stages I, II, III, IV, respectively).
  • Figure 7 shows the results of a RNA hybridization study evaluating the expression of drul RNA in raspberry leaf and fruit.
  • Figure 8 shows the results of polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins obtained from drupelets at various stages of ripening.
  • Figures 9A and 9B present a schematic description of the details of the vector construction for pAG-4032
  • Figure 10 presents a schematic description of the details of the vector construction for pAG-
  • a “chimeric gene,” in the context of the present invention, typically comprises a promoter sequence operably linked to "heterologous" DNA sequences, i.e., DNA sequences that encode a gene product not normally contiguous or associated with the promoter (e.g., a drul promoter adjacent DNA sequences encoding S-adenosylmediionine cleaving enzyme).
  • heterologous DNA sequences i.e., DNA sequences that encode a gene product not normally contiguous or associated with the promoter (e.g., a drul promoter adjacent DNA sequences encoding S-adenosylmediionine cleaving enzyme).
  • “drul homologous genes” are defined as genes that have at least about 55% or preferably
  • Sequence homology is determined essentially as follows. Two polynucleotide sequences of the same length (preferably, corresponding to the coding sequences of the gene) are considered to be homologous to one another, if, when they are aligned using die ALIGN program, over 55% or preferably 80% of die nucleic acids in die highest scoring alignment are identically aligned using a ktup of 1, the default parameters and the default PAM matrix (Dayhoff, 1972).
  • ALIGN program is found in the FASTA version 1.7 suite of sequence comparison programs (Pearson and Lipman, 1988; Pearson, 1990; program available from William R. Pearson, Department of Biological Chemistry, Box 440, Jordan Hall, Charlottesville, VA).
  • Two nucleic acid fragments are considered to be "selectively hybridizable" to a poly- nucleotide derived from a drul gene, if they are capable of specifically hybridizing to die coding sequences of the raspberry drul gene or a variant thereof or of specifically priming a polymerase chain amplification reaction: (i) under typical hybridization and wash conditions, as described, for example, in Maniatis, et al. (1982), pages 320-328, and 382-389.
  • Examples of such hybridization conditions are also given in Examples 8 and 9; (ii) using reduced stringency wash conditions that allow at most about 25-30% basepair mismatches, for example: 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, room temperature twice, 30 minutes each; men 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, 37°C. once, 30 minutes; men 2 x SSC room temperature twice, 10 minutes each, or (iii) selecting primers for use in typical polymerase chain reactions (PCR) under standard conditions (for example, in Saiki, et al., 1988), which result in specific amplification of sequences o drul or its variants.
  • PCR polymerase chain reactions
  • highly homologous nucleic acid strands contain less than 20-40% basepair mismatches, even more preferably less than 5-20% basepair mismatches. These degrees of homology can be selected by using wash conditions of appropriate stringency for identification of clones from gene libraries (or o er sources of genetic material), as is well known in e art.
  • a "drul encoded polypeptide” is defined herein as any polypeptide homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide.
  • a polypeptide is homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide if it is encoded by nucleic acid mat selectively hybridizes to sequences of drul or its variants.
  • a polypeptide is homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide if it is encoded by drul or its variants, as defined above, polypeptides of mis group are typically larger than 15, preferable 25, or more preferable 35, contiguous amino acids. Further, for polypeptides longer an about 60 amino acids, sequence comparisons for me purpose of determining "polypeptide homology" are performed using die local alignment program LALIGN. The polypeptide sequence is compared against die drul amino acid sequence or any of its variants, as defined above, using d e LALIGN program with a ktup of 1 , default parameters and me default PAM.
  • Any polypeptide with an optimal alignment longer than 60 amino acids and greater than 55% or preferably 80% of identically aligned amino acids is considered to be a "homologous polypeptide.”
  • the LALIGN program is found in the FASTA version 1.7 suite of sequence comparison programs (Pearson and Lipman, 1988; Pearson, 1990; program available from William R. Pearson, Department of Biological Chemistry, Box 440, Jordan Hall, Charlottesville, VA).
  • a polynucleotide is "derived from” drul if it has the same or substantially the same basepair sequence as a region ofthe drul protein coding sequence, cDNA oidrul or complements thereof, or if it displays homology as noted above.
  • a polypeptide or polypeptide "fragment” is "derived from” drul if it is (i) encoded by a drul gene, or (ii) displays homology to drul encoded polypeptides as noted above.
  • nucleic acid sequences when referring to sequences which encode a protein, polypeptide, or peptide, is meant to include degenerative nucleic acid sequences which encode homologous protein, polypeptide or peptide sequences as well as the disclosed sequence.
  • a "modified ripening" phenotype typically refers to an alteration of the rate of ripening of a transgenic fruit relative to corresponding wild-type fruit, such as, for example, delayed ripening fruit (i.e., ripening takes longer than corresponding wild-type fruit) or suspension of die fruit's ability to complete the ripening process.
  • a "product" encoded by a DNA molecule includes, for example, an RNA molecule or a polypeptide.
  • the present invention relates to die cloning of a gene expressed at very high levels in ripening fruit, exemplified by the drul gene from raspberries. Expression directed by die drul promoter described herein is fruit specific and active during fruit ripening.
  • Protein(s) such as those produced by raspberry are typically analyzed by gel electrophoresis.
  • a coomassie blue-stained SDS polyacrylamide gel of soluble drupelet proteins is shown in Figure 1 (Example 1).
  • Two highly abundant proteins isolable from raspberries are observed at approxi ⁇ mately 17 and 15 kd, and are referred to herein as drupel and drupe2, respectively.
  • the amount of drupel and drupe2 relative to the total amount of soluble protein can be determined, for exam ⁇ ple, by scanning densitometry. Scanning densitometry analysis of die gel illustrated in Fig. 1 indicates mat drupel and drupe2 comprise approximately 23 and 37%, respectively, of the total soluble protein in raspberry drupelets.
  • purification and sequencing of drupel and drupe2 can be carried out, for example, by using a direct western blot approach.
  • total drupelet proteins are western blotted to PDVF membrane (Example 1) and die regions corresponding to drupel and drupe2 are subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis.
  • the drupel sample yields a diirty amino acid N-terminal sequence (Example 1).
  • the amino terminal drupel sequence is presented herein as SEQ ID NO: 1.
  • mature green raspberry drupelet mRNA is prepared as described in Example 2 and used as template in a cDNA syndiesis reaction.
  • the reaction is primed using the dTRANDOM primer shown in Figures 2A and 2B.
  • the resulting cDNA (Example 2) is subjected to a standard PCR reaction using primers corresponding to a portion of die dTRANDOM primer and a 512-fold degenerate primer (Drupe 20) based on die drupel amino terminal sequence (Example 3).
  • PCR amplification products are men analyzed.
  • Products from the above PCR reaction include a 710 bp product that is agarose gel purified and subcloned into pCRJJ (Example 3). Subsequent sequence analysis of several of these clones allows identification of those clones whose sequence encodes a protein matching the amino terminal sequence of drupel.
  • genomic raspberry DNA is used in a PCR reaction using primers internal to the cDNA sequence obtained as described above (Example 4). This reaction produces a genomic clone of me drul gene containing most of the protein coding region. A single intron was identified from the subsequent sequence analysis of tiiis clone ( Figure 3B).
  • An inverse PCR strategy may be employed to characterize and sequence die 5' region of the gene containing the drul promoter (Example 5).
  • Figures 2A and 2B show schematically how this may be accomplished.
  • raspberry genomic DNA is digested widi Nsil and ligated under dilute conditions to allow circularization of the restriction fragments.
  • the ligated DNA is tiien subjected to PCR amplification using primers internal to the drul coding sequence and oriented in opposite directions from each other. This produces a PCR reaction product containing part of the first exon and 1.35 kb of the promoter.
  • sequence analysis of this clone in combination with sequence information from the previously described clones produces the complete drul sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12).
  • the drul gene (SEQ ID NO: 12) encodes a protein with the predicted amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO: 13.
  • the predicted molecular weight for tiiis protein is 17,088, which agrees closely with the 17kd molecular weight determined by gel electrophoresis (see Figure 1) of total drupelet protein.
  • the drul protein is relatively acidic with a predicted pl of 4.8. Nucleic acid and protein homology searches of the current sequence databases can be carried out to look for significant matches. For drul, nucleic acid and protein homology searches of the current sequence databases produced no significant matches. This result supports die original observation made widi die amino terminal sequence of die protein that drupel is a novel protein.
  • the gene expression pattern oidrul can be also be evaluated at die RNA and protein levels to confirm the tissue specificity of the promoter.
  • Northern dot blots, Figures 6 and 7, of total RNA from raspberry leaf and receptacles at different ripening stages indicate a tissue and stage specific gene expression pattern. This can be confirmed by comparison of northern blots of total RNA from various other plant tissues.
  • the tissue and stage specific gene expression pattern of drul was confirmed on northern blots of total RNA from leaf, receptacles, and drupelets (see Figures 6 and 7). In both cases, no drul expression is observed in leaf RNA.
  • the RNA expression pattern in receptacles is temporally regulated while in drupelets it is fully expressed at die two stages (i.e., green and ripe) analyzed.
  • a protein gel of drupelet lysates from different ripening stages can also be carried out to further support stage specific expression of drul.
  • electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins obtained from drupelets at various stages of ripening i.e. , green, mature green, breaker, orange, and ripe
  • stage specific expression pattern in drupelets Figure 8
  • the level of both protein and mRNA expression oidrul is very high. Aldiough not wishing to be bound by any particular mechanism for the observations described herein, tiiere are several possible mechanisms that may contribute to such high level protein and mRNA expression.
  • One mechanistic possibility is that the drul promoter is a strong promoter. Data supporting this mechanism for protein and mRNA expression is discussed above.
  • Characterization of die drul genomic clone allows isolation of die drul promoter. The promoter can then be used to regulate expression of heterologous genes.
  • An exemplary drul promoter has the sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22.
  • drulpro:- SAMase and c/r ⁇ 7pro:PGIP Two exemplary chimeric genes containing a drul promoter sequence operably linked to a heterologous DNA sequence, were constructed, drulpro:- SAMase and c/r ⁇ 7pro:PGIP (Example 7).
  • S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase (SAMase) and poly- galacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP) confer ethylene control and fungal resistance, respectively, in transgenic plants.
  • Botii proteins have been predicted to function more efficiently if expressed (i) in high levels and (ii) in a tissue specific manner. Accordingly, die drul promoter represents an ideal promoter to satisfy this objective.
  • the present invention provides for die use of drul promoters from species other than raspberry. Such promoters are useful for the generation of vector constructs containing heterolo- gous genes.
  • Southern blot experiments are used to demonstrate the presence of DNA molecules having significant sequence identity ( . e. , typically greater than 55 % , more preferably greater than 80% identity using standard sequence comparison programs) with the raspberry drul gene in, for example, strawberry, peach or plum. Similar Southern blot analyses may be performed on other fruit-bearing plants to identify additional drul genes.
  • Example 8 A Southern blot analysis used herein is detailed in Example 8. drul homologues are identified in a Southern blot of the genomic DNA of the plants listed above probed with a labelled DNA fragment containing the coding sequence of the raspberry drul gene.
  • the probe is selected to contain the coding sequence of drul, rather than the promoter sequence, because coding sequences are typically more conserved from species to species than are promoter sequences.
  • probe molecules are generated from raspberry genomic DNA using primer-specific amplification (Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al., 1987).
  • the oligonucleotide primers are selected such that the amplified region includes the entire coding sequence ofthe raspberry drul gene. Primers may also be selected to amplify only a selected region of die raspberry drul gene.
  • a probe can be made by isolating restriction-digest fragments containing the sequence of interest from plasmid DNA.
  • the probe is labeled with a detectable moiety to enable subsequent identification of homologous target molecules.
  • exemplary labeling moieties include radioactive nucleotides, such as ⁇ -labeled nucleotides, digoxygenin-labeled nucleotides, biotinylated nucleotides, and die like, available from commercial sources.
  • labeled nucleotides may be directly incorporated into the probe during the amplification process.
  • Probe molecules derived from DNA that has already been isolated, such as restriction-digest fragments from plasmid DNA, are typically end-labeled (Ausubel, et al., 1992).
  • Target molecules such as Hindlll DNA fragments from the genomes of the above-listed plants, are electrophoresed on a gel, blotted, and immobilized onto a nylon or nitrocellulose filter.
  • Labeled probe molecules are then contacted with the target molecules under conditions favoring specific hybridization between the probe molecules and target molecules homologous to the probe molecules (Maniatis, et al., 1982; Sambrook, et al, 1989; Ausubel, et al., 1992).
  • Conditions favoring specific hybridization are referred to as moderately to highly stringent, and are affected primarily by the salt concentration and temperature of tiie wash buffer (Ausubel, et al , 1992; Sambrook, et al. , 1989). Conditions such as those used in the final wash in Example 9 are typically classified as moderately stringent, due to the low salt concentration, and are expected to preserve only specific hybridization interactions, allowing the identification and isolation of homologous genes in different plant species.
  • target molecules with sequences homologous to the probe are identified by detecting die label on the probe.
  • the label may be detected directly, for example, as in a radioactive label detected on autoradiograms, or it may be detected with a secondary moiety, for example, fluorescently-labeled streptavidin binding to a bio ⁇ tinylated probe.
  • the DNA containing die desired genes may be isolated from the respective species, by, for example, the methods described herein for the isolation of the raspberry drul gene.
  • a library of interest e.g., genomic or cDNA
  • a probe containing sequences corresponding to the coding sequence of a known drul gene such as tiie raspberry drul gene (Example 9).
  • the screening is done using known metiiods (Ausubel, et al , 1992; Sambrook, et al, 1989), essentially as described above.
  • Positive plaques or colonies are isolated, and die insert DNA is sequenced and compared to known drul sequences. Clones containing inserts with sequences corresponding to genes homologous to raspberry drul are identified and, if necessary, used to obtain additional clones until the promoter region of interest is isolated.
  • Variants of the drul promoter may be isolated from different raspberry cultivars and from other plants by the methods described above.
  • a reporter gene such as GUS (/S-glucuronidase)
  • GUS /S-glucuronidase
  • stage specific e.g., stages of fruit ripening
  • Expression of GUS protein can be easily measured by fluorometric, spec- trophotometric or histochemical assays (Jefferson, 1987a, 1987b).
  • DNA sequences corresponding to regulatory domains can be identified using, for example, deletion analysis (Benfey, et al., 1990).
  • the drul promoter sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22 can be functionally linked to die GUS reporter gene. Deletion analysis can then be carried out by standard methods (Ausubel, et al, 1992; Maniatis, et al., 1982; Sambook, et al).
  • regions of the drul promoter sequence can be amplified using sequence-specific primers in PCR. These amplified fragments can then be inserted 5' to the GUS coding sequences and the resulting expression patterns evaluated.
  • Plant transformation vectors containing drul promoter/transcription-regulatory sequences, are constructed according to metiiods known in the art (see, for example, Houck and Pear, 1990, and Becker, et al. , 1992).
  • the present invention provides vectors suitable for the transformation of plants.
  • the vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs of the present invention are also useful for the expression of heterologous genes.
  • Transgenic plants, and their fruit products, carrying the chimeric genes of the present invention may be a useful source of recombinantly-expressed material.
  • die chimeric genes of die present invention have two components: (i) a promoter derived from a drul gene, and (ii) a heterologous DNA sequence encoding a desirable product.
  • the vectors of the present invention may be constructed to carry an expression cassette containing an insertion site for DNA coding sequences of interest.
  • the transcription of such inserted DNA is then under the control of a suitable drul promoter (i.e., raspberry drul gene promoter or homologs thereof).
  • Such expression cassettes may have single or multiple transcription termination signals at the coding-3'-end ofthe DNA sequence being expressed.
  • Such 3' sequences may include transcription termination sequences derived from the 3' non-coding region of die drul gene encoded mRNA.
  • the expression cassette may also include, for example, DNA sequences encoding (i) a leader sequence (e.g., to allow secretion or vacuolar targeting), and (ii) translation termination signals.
  • the vectors of the present invention may include selectable markers for use in plant cells (such as, the nptll kanamycin resistance gene).
  • the vectors may also include sequences that allow their selection and propagation in a secondary host, such as, sequences containing an origin of replication and a selectable marker.
  • Typical secondary hosts include bacteria and yeast.
  • the secondary host is Escherichia coli
  • the origin of replication is a colEl -type
  • the selectable marker is a gene encoding ampicillin resistance.
  • sequences are well known in the art and are commercially available as well (e.g., Clontech, Palo Alto, CA; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
  • the vectors of the present invention may also be modified to intermediate plant transforma ⁇ tion plasmids that contain a region of homology to an Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector, a T-DNA border region from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and chimeric genes or expression cassettes (described above). Further, the vectors of the invention may comprise a disarmed plant tumor inducing plasmid oi Agrobacterium tumefaciens.
  • suitable vectors may be constructed using die promoters of the present invention and standard plant transformation vectors, which are available both commercially (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and from academic sources (Waksman Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ).
  • the vectors of the present invention are useful for tissue and/or stage-specific expression of nucleic acid coding sequences in plant cells.
  • a selected peptide or polypeptide coding sequence can be inserted in an expression cassette of a vector ofthe present invention.
  • the vector is then transformed into host cells, the host cells cultured under conditions to allow the expression ofthe protein coding sequences, and the expressed peptide or polypeptide isolated from the cells.
  • Transformed progenitor cells can also be used to produce transgenic plants bearing fruit.
  • fruit produced by such transgenic plants has a reduced level of ethylene synthesis by the fruit. The fruit then demonstrates a modified ripening phenotype.
  • vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs of the present invention can be sold individually or in kits for use in plant cell transformation and the subsequent generation of transgenic plants.
  • tissue and/or stage-specific promoters of the present invention include a region of DNA that regulates transcription of the immediately adjacent (downstream) gene to a specific plant tissue.
  • heterologous genes are linked to the promoters of the present invention.
  • Exemplary heterologous gene for the transformation of plants include genes whose products are effective to reduce ethylene biosynthesis in specific tissues of those plants, e.g. the fruits. Some of these genes, including AdoMetase, are discussed above.
  • Otiier genes of interest that could be used in conjunction with the drul promoter include, but are not limited to, the following: other ripening modification genes, in addition to AdoMetase, such as, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase (Klee, et al., 1991; Sheehy, et al., 1991), which degrades precursors of ethylene biosynthesis; ripening modification through the use of gene inactivation methods including antisense or cosuppression affecting genes of the eth ⁇ ylene biosynthetic pathway such as the genes endoding ACC synthase (Sato and Theologis, 1989) or ACC oxidase (Hamilton, et al, 1990).
  • AdoMetase such as, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase (Klee, et al., 1991; Sheehy, et al.
  • genes involved in conferring fungal resistance e.g., the polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP) from Phaseolus vulgaris (Toubart, et al., 1992) and modified forms of plant glucanase, chitinase and other pathogenesis related (PR) genes (Melchers, et al, 1993, 1994; Ponstein, et al., 1994; Woloshuk, et al., 1991) would be improved when used with a high-level, fruit-specific promoter such as drul.
  • antisense or cosuppression genes encoding proteins responsible for degradative processes in the fruit may also be used in conjunction with the promoters of the present invention.
  • genes of this type include polygalacturonase, cellulase, and pectin methyl esterase
  • flavor e.g., thaumatin; GENBANK
  • color modification e.g., products that modify lycopene synthesis, for example, arabidopsis
  • genes would include genes which encoded degradative enzymes diat deplete necessary metabolites.
  • Derivatives of the drul promoter region can be used as on/off switches for the tissue and/or stage-specific expression of genes whose expression is under their control.
  • the vector constructs of the present invention can be used for transformation and expression of heterologous sequences in transgenic plants independent of the original plant source for the promoter sequence. Further, the expression mediated by the promoter appears to be tissue and/or stage-specific even in heterologous plants. Accordingly, the vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs ofthe present invention are useful for transformation of species of fruit-bearing plants, where such plants are different species than the plant source of the promoter sequences.
  • VI. UTILITY The present invention relates to the cloning of a gene expressed at very high levels in ripening fruit, e.g., raspberries.
  • the gene isolated from raspberry was designated drul and encodes a protein with a molecular weight of 17kd.
  • Analysis of protein expression in raspberry drupelets indicates drul comprises at least 23% of the total protein.
  • dru2 an apparently similar 15kd protein expressed at even higher levels, these two proteins comprise at least 65% ofthe protein in raspberry drupelets. This is an unusually high level of gene expression for any plant tissue otiier than seed storage proteins.
  • drul can be cloned as described above employing N-terminal amino acid sequence information and corresponding degenerate PCR primers used in RT-PCR reactions to obtain a cDNA clone. Inverse PCR can be used to obtain a genomic clone of the gene including the drul promoter.
  • the drul gene represents an import discovery in the field of agricultural biotechnology from several standpoints.
  • the drul promoter can be used to express any heterologous gene whose function would be enhanced or enabled by a high level, tissue specific promoter.
  • Two examples of such genes have been described herein: the SAMase gene (for control of ethylene synthesis and therefore ripening control), and the PGIP gene (for fungal control, specifically gray mold or Botrytis cinerea).
  • SAMase gene for control of ethylene synthesis and therefore ripening control
  • the PGIP gene for fungal control, specifically gray mold or Botrytis cinerea
  • Other exemplary genes are described above.
  • the raspberry is essentially a miniature drupe fruit so it is likely that the drul promoter will function in other drupe fruits.
  • the constructs and metiiods of the present invention are applicable to all higher plants including, but not limited to, the following: Berry-like fruits, for example, Vitis (grapes), Fragaria (strawberries), Rubus (raspberries, blackberries, loganberries), Ribes (currants and gooseberries), Vaccinium, (blueberries, bilberries, whortleberries, cranberries), Actinida Q ⁇ wiir it and Chinese gooseberry).
  • drupe fruits including, but not limited to, Malus (apple), Pyrus (pears), most members of the Prunus genera, sapota, mango, avocado, apricot, peaches, cherries, plums, and nectarines.
  • Control of etiiylene production via, for example, a drulpio- :SAMase chimera would be valuable in climacteric fruits (e.g., peaches and plums) which suffer from over-ripening in post-harvest distribution systems.
  • the results described herein that the drul gene is expressed in receptacles makes it likely that the promoter will function in strawberries.
  • the strawberry fruit is a swollen receptacle that is indistinguishable, from a botanical standpoint, from the raspberry receptacle.
  • All drupe fruits (e.g. , raspberries) and strawberries are members ofthe Rosacea genera thus making the drul promoter likely to function as a fruit specific promoter in heterologous species of this genera.
  • the present invention provides compositions and methods to regulate plant cell expression of any gene in a tissue and/or stage-specific manner.
  • the invention teaches the use of the drul tissue and stage-specific promoter whose expression is induced during fruit ripening.
  • the promoters of the present invention can be used to regulate cellular production of ethylene.
  • a gene whose product results in a reduction of ethyl- ene synthesis is operably linked to a drul promoter (creating a chimeric gene).
  • a drul promoter creating a chimeric gene.
  • Exemplary gene products that result in reduction of ethylene synthesis include, but are not limited to the following: S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase; 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylate deaminase (Klee, et al., 1991; Sheehy, et al, 1991); tiie ACC synthase gene in an antisense or cosuppression configuration (Oeller, et al, 1991; Van der Straeten, et al, 1990); and die ACC oxidase gene in either an antisense or cosuppression configuration (Hamilton, et al, 1990; Holdsworth, et al, 1987). Cosuppression has been described by Jorgensen, et al (1991, 1993).
  • gene products that may be useful in the reduction of ethylene biosynthesis include catalytic antibodies and ribozyme molecules.
  • the present invention provides, in one aspect, nucleic acid constructs suitable for trans ⁇ forming plants with heterologous genes under the control of a drul promoter.
  • the plant is a fruit-bearing plant
  • the heterologous gene is a gene effective to reduce ethylene biosynthesis in fruit from the plant.
  • the drul promoter may be employed in vector constructs used to produce transgenic plants, such as transgenic raspberries.
  • a vector engineered according to methods of die present invention containing the drul promoter connected to the AdoMetase gene e.g. vector pAG-4032
  • the AdoMetase gene will be expressed in the fruit of these transgenic plants and will delay ripening.
  • An advantage ofthe method of the present invention compared to other ripening inhibi- tion approaches, namely antisense and/or cosuppression of ACC oxidase and ACC synthase, is a savings of time and resources involved in vector construction, since the same vector can be used to transform many different plant types.
  • drul promoter sequences may be isolated from the same type of plant that is to be transformed, and incorporated into the vector constructs used to perform the transformations.
  • a strawberry drul promoter may be connected to a heterologous gene, such as the
  • AdoMetase gene and used to transform strawberries.
  • Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Operon Technologies, Inc., Alameda, CA. Generally, the nomenclature and laboratory procedures with respect to standard recombinant
  • Raspberry Drupelet Protein Characterization and Purification A. PROTEIN LYSATE PREPARA ⁇ ON AND GEL ELECTROPHORESIS.
  • a raspberry protein sample was prepared by grinding the frozen drupes of one whole berry into a fine powder.
  • Sample buffer 0.05 M Tris, pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 5% beta-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol; Laemelli, 1970
  • the sample was heated for 10 minutes at 90-95 °C and centrifuged at 14K ⁇ m, 4°C for 10 minutes. The supernatant was re ⁇ moved from the insoluble debris pellet and stored at -20°C.
  • Drupelet proteins were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electro ⁇ phoresis (SDS PAGE) combined widi coomassie blue staining using standard procedures for these steps.
  • a coomassie blue-stained SDS polyacrylamide gel of soluble drupelet proteins is shown in Figure 1.
  • lane 1 molecular weight markers (BioRad, Richmond, CA)
  • lanes 2, 3 and 5 each contain 9 ⁇ g of raspberry drupelet protein lysate prepared separately from individual fruit.
  • Lane 4 had a higher amount of lysate.
  • drupel and drupe2 Two highly abundant proteins were observed at approximately 17 and 15 kd and were named drupel and drupe2, respectively. In Figure 1 these two proteins are indicated by arrows. Scanning densitometry analysis of this gel indicated drupel and drupe2 comprise approximately 23 and 37%, respectively, of die total soluble protein in raspberry drupelets. As a result of this determination, a direct western blot approach to purification and sequencing of the protein was taken.
  • PVDF polyvinyl sulfate
  • the blot was Coomassie blue stained and the 15 and 17 kilo- dalton (kd) protein bands were located on the blot and cut out. N-terminal sequencing of the proteins was carried out at the W.M. Keck Foundation, Biotechnology Resource Laboratory in New Haven, CT.
  • the drupel sample yielded a thirty amino acid N-terminal sequence.
  • the drupe2 sample did not yield useful sequence information likely due to a blocked amino terminus.
  • the amino terminal drupel sequence is presented as SEQ ID NO:l. This 30 amino acid drupel sequence was compared to the protein database using BLAST searching; no significant matches were found indicating that drupel is a novel protein.
  • the estimated weight of the drupelets was 12 grams.
  • a cold mortar which contained liquid nitrogen, the whole berries were fractured by tapping them with a pestle.
  • the drupelets were separated from the receptacles.
  • the receptacles were removed from the mortar and discarded.
  • the drupelets were ground to a powder in the mortar, adding liquid nitrogen as necessary to keep the tissue frozen. The seeds were pu ⁇ osefully left intact. Homogenization buffer, 2 ml/gram of tissue, was used to extract the RNA.
  • the frozen powdered drupelet tissue was added to the buffer in 3 to 5 portions, vortexing between additions until all tissue was moistened.
  • the tissue plus buffer solution (referred to herein as the pulp) was diluted 1:1 with sterile water and 0.75 volumes of homogenization buffer were added to the diluted pulp.
  • the sample was incubated at 65°C for 10 to 15 minutes, followed by centrifugation in a swinging bucket rotor at 9000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube.
  • Cesium chloride (CsCl) was added to the supernatant at 0.2 g/ml. The sample was mixed until die CsCl dissolved.
  • a 4 ml cushion was dispensed into a Beckman 1 x 3.5 inch polyallomer ultracentrifuge tube (cushion: 5.7 M CsCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM NajEDTA, pH 8.). The sample was gently layered on top of the cushion. The sample was spun in a Beckman L8-80M ultracentrifuge with a SW 28 rotor at 23,000 m at 20°C for 20 hours. After removing the sample from the ultracentrifuge the supernatant was pulled off the sample by using a drawn Pasteur pipette attached to an aspirator. A clear lens-like pellet was visible in die bottom of the tube. The pellet was dissolved in 500 ⁇ l SSTE and transferred to a microfuge tube (SSTE: 0.8 M
  • RNA was re-precipitated widi 1/9 volume 3 M Sodium Acetate and 3 volumes ethanol for storage at -20°C.
  • mRNA was isolated from the 1.6 mg of total RNA extracted from mature green raspberry drupelets described above. The yield of mRNA from this procedure was
  • the oligo(dT) region hybridized to the poly(A) region of the mRNA pool.
  • the other 15 nucleotides created a 5 * overhang that was used to facilitate PCR amplification at a later step in the cloning process.
  • the following reaction mixture was assembled for the cDNA synthesis reaction: H 2 0, 10.2 ⁇ l; 250 ng mRNA, 0.8 ⁇ l; 5 x BRL RT buffer (BRL, Bethesda, MD), 4.0 ⁇ l; 100 mM DTT (dithiothreitol - BRL, Bethesda, MD), 0.2 ⁇ l; "RNAguard" (23.4 U/ ⁇ l; an RNase inhibitor from Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), 0.5 ⁇ l; dNTP's (2.5 mM each), 2.0 ⁇ l; 50 ⁇ M primer, 1.0 ⁇ l; [ ⁇ JdCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; DuPont/NEN, Boston, MA), 1.0 ⁇ l; and AMV-reverse-transcriptase (38 U/ ⁇ l; Life Sciences, Inc., St.
  • the cDNA reaction was performed by combining mRNA and water for the reaction and heating to 65 C C for 3 minutes. The mixture was cooled on ice and microfuged (to collect condensation). The remaining reaction components were then added. After incubating at 42°C for 1 hour the cDNA reactions were moved to ice and stored at 4°C prior to their use in PCR reactions.
  • EXAMPLE 3 PCR Amplification and Cloning of the cDNA Drul Fragment
  • Drupe20 was designed for the 5' end of the cDNA based on the reverse translation of the drul protein sequence.
  • a section of the known amino acid sequence of drul (SEQ ID NO:3) was chosen for its proximity to the amino terminus and for the relatively low level of degeneracy in its reverse-translated sequence (SEQ ID NO:4; Drupe20).
  • the Drupe20 primer (i) is the 512-fold degenerate nucleotide sequence corresponding to the amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:3, and (ii) was used as the 3'-primer.
  • the 5' PCR primer (DrupeRAN18, SEQ ID NO:5, corresponding to the cDNA primer, dTRANDOM) was designed for die 3' end.
  • Polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT; Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al, 1987, was performed following the manufacturer's procedure using "AMPLITAQ” (Perkin Elmer Cetus), PCR buffer II (50.0 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3), 2 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM of each dNTP, mature green drupelet cDNA and Drupe20 and DrupeRAN18 primers under the following conditions:
  • the cDNA clones of the drul gene were identified by screening plasmid miniprep DNA prepared from 1.6 ml of culture using the alkaline lysis method (Ausubel, et al., 1992).
  • the double-stranded DNA was sequenced by die dideoxy chain-termination method using die "SEQUENASE” ver.2 enzyme and kit components (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, Ohio) and [ ⁇ - 35 S]-dATP (DuPont/NEN).
  • the reactions were primed with the M13 universal forward and reverse primers (NEB, Beverly, MA). Sequencing reactions were resolved on an acrylamide gel ("LONG RANGER GEL," FMC, Rockland, Maine) and bands detected by autoradiography.
  • the sequence was read from the autoradiograph and analyzed for its homology with the reverse translated N-terminal protein sequence from drupel. The actual DNA sequence was determined, as opposed to the degenerate DNA sequence obtained through reverse translation of the protein sequence. In addition, the correlation between the cDNA and the remainder of the N-terminal protein sequence was confirmed. A clone (designated pAG-301) was selected, follow ⁇ ing these criteria, for further characterization.
  • the nucleic acid sequence ofthe drul cDNA insert of pAG-301 is presented as SEQ ID NO: 10. The entire drul cloning procedure from cDNA synthesis to inverse PCR of a genomic copy of the gene is shown schematically in Figures 2A and 2B.
  • PCR was performed following the manufacturer's procedure using "AMPLITAQ” (Perkin-Elmer Cetus), PCR buffer (50.0 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, and 1.5 mM MgCl j ), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, raspberry genomic DNA and DruGen5' and DruGen3' primers under the following (“HOT START”) conditions:
  • This amplification reaction produced 3 major products: a predominant product of 710 bp and 2 less abundant products of 690 and 625 bp.
  • the PCR reaction products were then ligated to the vector pCRII, the TA cloning vector from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA), following the manufacturer's instructions.
  • a clone was selected widi a 710 bp insert and designated pAG-302.
  • Plasmid DNA of pAG-302 was prepared from 1.6 ml of culture using the alkaline lysis method (Ausubel, et al. , 1992) and sequenced by the dideoxy chain-termination method using
  • sequencing reactions were primed with the M13 universal forward and reverse primers (NEB, Beverly, MA). Further sequencing reactions were primed with 2 additional internal primers. Sequencing reactions were resolved on an acrylamide gel and detected through autoradiography.
  • the sequence of the drul genomic DNA insert in pAG-302 is presented as SEQ ID NO: 11.
  • the sequence of the clone demonstrated that a genomic DNA fragment corresponding to die drul cDNA had been isolated.
  • EXAMPLE 5 Recovering the 5' Flanking Region of the drul Genomic DNA Through Inverse PCR Inverse PCR primers (designated DruInvUp, SEQ ID NO:8, and DruInvLow, SEQ ID NO:9) were designed based upon die genomic DNA sequence and optimized using OLIGO. Genomic raspberry DNA was digested with restriction enzyme ⁇ VMI. Nsil was chosen because, based on the cD ⁇ A sequence, Nsil was known to cut in the 3'-untranslated region of tiie gene. A small portion ofthe Nsil digested D ⁇ A was run on an analytical agarose gel and a Southern transfer was performed (Ausubel, et al, 1992).
  • the Southern blot was probed with the cD ⁇ A fragment contained in pAG-302.
  • the probe identified a Nsil fragment of about 2-2.3 kb: this fragment hybridized strongly with the genomic clone.
  • a second, smaller fragment hybridized to the probe as well but hybridized weakly with the genomic clone.
  • the remaining Njil-digested raspberry D ⁇ A was electrophoresed on a 1 %"SEAPLAQUE" agarose gel (FMC, Rockland, ME). Using a BstEll lambda size standard as a guide, the digested D ⁇ A in the range of 2-2.3 kb was excised from the gel. The D ⁇ A was purified using ⁇ -agarase ( ⁇ EB, Beverly, MA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The D ⁇ A was self ligated at a relatively dilute concentration (1 ⁇ g/ml) to bias the formation of circular ligation reaction products (Ochman, et al., 1990). Inverse PCR was subsequently performed on the self-ligated, N ⁇ il-digested, size-selected, genomic raspberry DNA. "AMPLITAQ" from Perkin Elmer Cetus was used to amplify the DNA.
  • the 1.8 kb band was isolated from a 1 % "SEAPLAQUE" agarose gel using ⁇ -agarase. This fragment was ligated to pCRII to give rise to pAG-310.
  • the pAG-310 insert was sequenced in its entirety (SEQ ID NO: 12) and the drul insert sequence was found to be identical to the cDNA clone (SEQ ID NO: 10) and the genomic clone (SEQ ID NO: 11) in the regions where sequence was shared.
  • the normal elements of plant genes and their regulatory components were identified ( Figures 3A and 3B) including a CAAT box, TATA box, ATG start codon, two exons, an intron, splicing sites, a stop codon and poly ⁇ adenylation sites.
  • the gene organization and protein structure oidrul is schematically displayed in Figure 4.
  • the gene encodes a protein having the predicted amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO: 13.
  • the predicted protein has a calculated molecular weight of 17,087.64 and an estimated pi of 4.80.
  • a Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity plot of the drul protein is presented as Figure 5.
  • RNA dot blots were prepared using 5 ⁇ g of total raspberry leaf RNA and 5 ⁇ g each of total receptacle RNA from green, mature green, breaker & orange/ripe raspberries (corresponding to stages I, II, III, IV, respectively, in Figure 6). The blots were probed with the drul cDNA fragment, labeled with [32-P]dCTP (> 3000 Ci/mmole) by die random primed method (Boeringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Random Primed reaction kit, Indianapolis, IN).
  • the blots were allowed to hybridize overnight at 45 °C in "HYBRISOL I" (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). A probe concentration of 1.2 x IO 7 DPM/ml was used. The blot was washed after the overnight hybridization with a final wash using 0.1 x SSC at 42 °C for 1 hour. The hybridizing probe was detected through standard autoradiographic methods. The exposure of the blot to film was for 4 hours and 10 minutes with an intensifying screen at -80°C.
  • RNA dots are, respec ⁇ tively from left to right, leaf RNA and receptacle RNA from green (Figure 6, "I"), mature green ( Figure 6, “II”), breaker ( Figure 6, “III”) and orange/ripe raspberries ( Figure 6, “IV”).
  • RNA extraction method (Chang, et al., 1993) was used for receptacles and leaves.
  • the raspberry drupelet RNA extraction method described above was used for the drupelets and raspberry fruit.
  • a Northern blot was prepared using 5 ⁇ g/lane of each sample RNA.
  • the RNA samples were as follows: raspberry leaf ( Figure 7, lane 1), mature green raspberry receptacles (Figure 7, lane 2), orange/ripe raspberry receptacles ( Figure 7, lane 3), mature green raspberry drupelets ( Figure 7, lane 4), and orange/ripe raspberry drupelets ( Figure 7, lane 5).
  • the blot was probed with the drul cDNA fragment, labeled with [ ⁇ JdCTP (> 3000 Ci/mmole) by random primed reactions. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 45 °C in "HYBRISOL I" (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). A probe concentration of 4.2 x IO 6 DPM/ml was used. The blot was washed after the overnight hybridization with a final wash using 0.1 x SSC at 50°C for 30 minutes. The hybridizing probe was detected through standard autoradiographic methods. The exposure of the blot to film was for 1 hour at room temperature without an intensifying screen.
  • Protein lysates were prepared (as described in Example 1) from raspberry drupelets at various stages of ripening. The lysates were size-fractionated by PAGE and the gel stained widi Coomaise blue (50% MeOH, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgC12). The results of this work are presented in Figure 8. In the figure the lysates in the lanes were as follows: lane 1, green drupelet; lane 2, mature green drupelet; lane 3, breaker drupelet; lane 4, orange drupelet; and lane 5, ripe drupelet. The results of this analysis supports a stage specific expression pattern in drupe- lets. EXAMPLE 7 Chimeric Genes Containing the drul Promoter A. CONSTRUCTION OF A DRU1PRO:SAMASE BINARY VECTOR.
  • a fragment containing the Drul promoter was PCR amplified from pAG-310 using primers DruPro5'RI (SEQ ID NO: 14) and DruPro3' (SEQ ID NO: 15) and standard PCR reaction condi ⁇ tions.
  • the amplification reaction produced a 1.3 kb fragment product.
  • This fragment was digested to completion with EcoRI and Ncol.
  • the digested fragment was ligated into pAG-112, a pUC vector carrying an AdoMetase encoding gene (Ferro, et al, 1995) with a nos terminator.
  • the resulting plasmid was designated pAG-119.
  • pAG-119 plasmid D ⁇ A was digested to completion widi Smal and Hindlll.
  • pAG-4000 was obtained from pPZP-200 (Hajdukiewicz, et al, 1994) by inserting a CMVV/nptII/G7 terminator gene cassette into the multiple cloning site of pPZP-200.
  • the CMVV (Cassava mottle vein virus) promoter was obtained from Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA).
  • pAG-4000 was digested with Smal and Hindlll and ligated to the 2. lkb pAG-119 fragment to form vector pAG-4032. The details of this construction are described schematically in Figure 9.
  • SAMase chimeric gene SAMase chimeric gene is presented as S ⁇ Q ID NO: 16.
  • the predicted amino acid coding sequence is presented as S ⁇ Q ID NO: 17.
  • the PGIP gene (Toubart, et al, 1992) and its 3' untranslated region (UTR) was PCR amplified from pAD-16 (Toubart, et al, 1992) using the primers PGIPNco5' (SEQ ID NO: 18) and PGIPPst3 * (SEQ ID NO: 19).
  • the amplification reaction produced a product of 1.8 kb.
  • This 1.8 kb fragment included a portion of the cloning vector.
  • the fragment was digested with Ncol and Pstl to completion resulting in a 1290 bp fragment which no longer contained portions of the cloning vector.
  • pAG-119 (see above) was prepared by digestion to completion with Ncol and Pstl.
  • pAG-129 was digested to completion widi Xbal and PvuII (a restriction enzyme whose cleavage results in blunt ends).
  • PvuII a restriction enzyme whose cleavage results in blunt ends.
  • the 2.87 kb fragment containing Drulpro/PGIP/ ⁇ os terminator was recovered from 1% "SEAPLAQUE" agarose by using ⁇ -agarase.
  • the vector pAG-4033 was prepared by digestion to completion with Xbal and Smal (a restriction enzyme whose cleavage results in blunt ends).
  • the complete nucleotide sequence of the drul promoter:PGIP chimeric gene is presented as SEQ ID NO:20.
  • the predicted amino acid coding sequence is presented as SEQ ID NO:21.
  • EXAMPLE 8 Southern Blot Analysis of drul Homologues in Several Species of Plants A Southern blot analysis is conducted to determine if sequences homologous to the raspberry drul gene are present in other plant species.
  • the blot consists oi Hindlll digests of six genomic plant DNAs, for example, tomato, raspberry, strawberry, plum, cherry and peach, along with size standards. Probes can be constructed using drul coding sequence-specific primers and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al., 1987). Alternatively, the 700 base pair insert from pAG-301 (SEQ ID NO: 10) is isolated by digestion with EcoRI followed by size fractionation.
  • the DNA fragment is then radioactively-labeled using die Bohringer Mannheim Biochemical (Indi- anapolis, IN) "RANDOM PRIMED DNA LABELING" kit.
  • the blot is hybridized with the drul- specific probe following standard methods (Maniatis, et al, 1982). Exemplary hybridization conditions are as follows: die blot is hybridized overnight at 45 °C with the drul probe in "HY- BRISOL I" hybridization cocktail (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). The final (most stringent) wash is 0.1% SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes at room temperature (22 °C). An autoradiograph of the blot is used to identify plant species to whose genomic DNA the drul probe can hybridize.
  • a clone of interest is digested with several enzymes (e.g. , Apa I, Bam HI, Eco RI, Hind III,
  • Neo I, Sac I, and Sal I run on a gel, and transferred to a "SUREBLOT" nylon membrane (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD).
  • the blot is hybridized overnight at 45°C with the drul probe in "HYBRISOL I” hybridization cocktail (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD).
  • the final (most stringent) wash is 0.1% SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes at room temperature (22°C).
  • a hybridization-positive fragment is subcloned into pGEM5Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI) and further characterized.
  • the nucleic acid sequence of the insert is determined and the amino acid sequence predicted from the nucleic acid sequence. These sequences are then compared to the raspberry drul nucleic acid and protein sequences. Additional strawberry drul gene sequences are obtained by further hybridization screening of strawberry genomic library clones.
  • CAATTCACTC AAAAGAATGA TGGCAGCAGC ATTGCCAAAG TGTCCATTGA ATATGAGAAA 360
  • GGTGTACCGT GTACTAATCA AATATCTACC TGATCTTATT GATTTGAAAG ATCATAAAAA 240 GAAATTAAAA TTGTTCAAAA TAAACCCCTA GAATTATATA TAGTTCATTA AGTTCAAATT 300
  • CTCTCGGCGG TAAGAGGAGA TATCCTCAGT CGAATTATGA GCCGATCGAG GAAAGCTCGA 420
  • GACTCTTAGC AACTTAAGTT TCAAACCGTG ACGAACCAAT AAAATTTGAC AAATTAATCA 540
  • Lys Ala lie lie Leu Asn Gly Leu Glu Gly Asp Val Phe Gin Tyr Tyr
  • Lys Gly lie Asp Gly Tyr Lys Ala Glu Arg Leu Pro Gly Ser Phe Gin 115 120 125
  • AAAAGGAGAA AATGTATAAG ATCGTTGCTT ACTTAATTTG CAGGCTAGGT TAATTGACAT 1080
  • ACTGCACTCT CAGAGCTATG CAACCCACAA GATAAGCAAG CCCTTCTCCA AATCAAGAAA 1500 GACCTTGGCA ACCCAACCAC TCTCTCTTCA TGGCTTCCAA CCACCGACTG TTGTAACAGA 1560
  • CTCTCCGGCC ATAACCTCCC AAAACCCTAC CCTATCCCTT CCTCCCTCGC CAACCTCCCC 1680
  • GGTGTACCGT GTACTAATCA AATATCTACC TGATCTTATT GATTTGAAAG ATCATAAAAA 240
  • CTCTCGGCGG TAAGAGGAGA TATCCTCAGT CGAATTATGA GCCGATCGAG GAAAGCTCGA 420
  • GACTCTTAGC AACTTAAGTT TCAAACCGTG ACGAACCAAT AAAATTTGAC AAATTAATCA 540

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pregnancy & Childbirth (AREA)
  • Reproductive Health (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to chimeric genes having (i) a DNA sequence encoding a product of interest, and (ii) a drul promoter, where said DNA sequence is heterologous to said promoter and said DNA sequence is operably linked to said promoter to enable expression of said product. The invention describes vectors, cells, plants, and fruits carrying the chimeric gene, as well as methods related thereto.

Description

PLANT TISSUE/STAGE SPECIFIC PROMOTERS FOR REGULATED EXPRESSION OF TRANSGENES IN PLANTS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to the identification and characterization of tissue and/or stage specific plant promoters and compositions and metiiods employing such promoters.
REFERENCES
Ausubel, F.M., et al., in CURRENT PROTOCOLS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Media PA (1992).
Becker, D., et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 2fi:1195-1197 (1992).
Bellini, C, et al., BiolTechnol 7(5):503-508 (1989).
Benfey, P.N., et al., Science 25Q.: pages 959-966 (1990).
Bestwick, R.K., et al., PCT International Publication No. WO 95/35387, published 28 December 1995.
Chang, S., et al, Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter 11(2): 113-116 (1993).
Comai, L. and Coning, A.J., U.S. Patent No. 5,187,267, issued 16 February, 1993.
Cordes, S., et al., The Plant Cell 1:1025-1034 (1989).
Dayhoff, M.O., in ATLAS OF PROTEIN SEQUENCE AND STRUCTURE Vol. 5, National Biomedical Research Foundation, pp . 101 - 110, and Supplement 2 to this volume, pp . 1 - 10 (1972) .
Doyle, J . and Doyle, J.L., Focus 12:13-15 (1990).
Ferro, A.J., et cd., U.S. Patent No. 5,416,250, issued 16 May 1995.
Hajdukiewicz, P., et al., Plant Mol. Bio. 21:989-994 (1994).
Hamilton, A.J., et al, Nature 3_4£:284-287 (1990). Herreraestrella, L., et al, World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology. H(4):383-392
(1995).
Holdsworth, M.J., et al, Nuc. Acids Res. 15:731-739 (1987).
Houck, CM. and Pear, J.R., U.S. Patent No. 4,943,674, issued 24 July 1990.
Hughes, J.A., et al., J. Bad. 162:3625-3632 (1987). Jefferson, R.A., et al, EMBO J. &3901 (1987a).
Jefferson, R.A., Plant Mol Biol Rep. 5:387 (1987b).
Jorgensen, R.A., et al, U.S. Patent No. 5,034,323, issued 23 July 1991.
Jorgensen, R.A., et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,231,020, issued 27 July 1993.
Kawasaki, E.S., et al., in PCR TECHNOLOGY: PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS OP DNA AMPLIFICATION (H.A. Erlich, ed.) Stockton Press (1989).
Klee, H.J., et al, Plant Cell :1187-1193 (1991). Klein, T.M., et al., PNAS (USA) £5(22): 8502-8505 (1988). Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R.F., J. Mol Biol. 152:105-132 (1982). Laemelli, U.K., Nature 227:680-685 (1970). Lin, E., et al., Plant Mol Biol. 21:489-499 (1993). Maniatis, T., et al., in MOLECULAR CLONING: A LABORATORY MANUAL. Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory (1982).
Mathews, H., et al, PCT International Publication No. WO 95/35388, published 28 December 1995.
Melchers, L.S., et al, Plant Mol. Bio. 21:583-593 (1993). Melchers, L.S., et al, Plant J. 5:469-480 (1994).
Miki, B.L.A., et al., in PLANT DNA INFECTIOUS AGENTS (Hohn. T., etal, Eds.) Springer- Verlag, Wien, Austria, pp.249-265 (1987).
Mullis, K.B., et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,683,195, issued 28 July 1987. Mullis, K.B., U.S. Patent No. 4,683,202, issued 28 July 1987. Ni, M., et al, Plant J. 7:661-676 (1995).
Ochman, H., et al, in AMPLIFICATION OF FLANKING SEQUENCES BY INVERSE PCR IN PCR PROTOCOLS: A GUIDE TO METHODS AND APPLICATIONS (Innis, et al, Eds.) Academic Press, pp. 291-227 (1990).
Oeller, P.W., et al, Science 254:437-439 (1991). Pearson, W.R., Methods in Enzymology 151:63-98 (1990).
Pearson, W.R. and Lipman, D.J., PNAS £5:2444-2448 (1988). Ponstein, A.S., et al, Plant Physiology 104:109-118 (1994). Saiki, R.K., et al, Science 219:487-491 (1988).
Sambrook, J., et al., in MOLECULAR CLONING: A LABORATORY MANUAL. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Vol. 2 (1989).
Sato, T., and Theologis, A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA £6_:6621-6625 (1989). Schuch, W., Euphytica. 72(3):287-291 (1994). Sheehy, R.E., et al, J. Bad. 173:5260-5265 (1991). Toubart, P., et al, Plant J. 1:367-373 (1992). Van der Straeten, D., et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA £7:4859-4863 (1990).
Van Haaren, M.J.J., et al, Plant Mol Bio. 21:625-640 (1993). Walkerpeach, C.R., et al, Plant Molecular Biology Manual, Bl:l-19 (1994). Wang, A.M., et al in PCR PROTOCOLS: A GUIDE TO METHODS AND APPLICATIONS (M.A. Innis, et al, eds.) Academic Press (1990). Woloshuk, C.P., et al, J. Plant Cell 1:619-628 (1991). Zhu, Q., et al, Plant Cell 2:1681-1689 (1995).
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In recent years recombinant DNA technology has been used to circumvent many limitations of traditional plant breeding programs. This technology has allowed workers to (i) identify and clone desirable genes (such as, genes expressing products that confer disease and insect resistance (Herreraestrella, etal., 1995), (ii) transfer such genes into plants (Walkerpeach, etal, 1994), and (iii) alter selected plant phenotypes by the expression of such genes (Ferro, et al., 1995; Benfey, et al, 1990; Klee, et al, 1991).
A large number of examples of plant promoters useful for the expression of selected genes in plants are now available (Zhu, et al, 1995; Ni, et al., 1995). These promoters have been used to drive the expression of foreign (or heterologous) genes in plants. In most cases, the 5' non¬ coding regions of the genes (i.e., regions immediately 5* to the coding region) have been used to generate chimeric genes. These regions are often referred to as promoter or transcriptional regulatory sequences. Promoters useful for the expression of a selected nucleic acid sequence in plants can be derived from plant DNA or from other sources, for example, plant viruses. In most cases, it has been demonstrated that sequences up to about 500-1500 bases allow regulated expression of genes under their control. Expression of heterologous genes or selected sequences of genes in transgenic plants has typically involved the use of constitutive promoters. Exemplary plant promoters include the following: 35S Cauliflower Mosaic Virus (CaMV 35S), mannopine synthase, and octopine synthase (ocs). Such promoters have been used successfully to direct the expression of heterologous nucleic acid sequences in transformed plant tissue. However, when used to express DNA sequences in transgenic plants these promoters typically provide low level, constitutive expression (i.e., expression in all plant tissue).
Other promoters have been identified that allow tissue specific expression, for example, fruit specific expression, such as the E4 and E8 promoters from tomatoes (Cordes, et al, 1989; Bestwick, et al., 1995). Also, it has been demonstrated that nucleic acid sequences placed under the regulatory control of the 5' non-coding region of the tomato 2AII gene (Van Haaren) are preferentially transcribed in developing fruit tissue. Fruit specific regulation of the kiwifruit actinidin promoter has been reported to be conserved in transgenic petunia plants (Lin, et al, 1993). SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention includes a promoter that allows high-level, tissue specific expression of nucleic acid sequences placed under its regulation. Chimeric genes of the present invention have a DNA sequence encoding a product of interest under the transcriptional control of a dru promoter. The DNA sequence is typically heterologous to the promoter and is operably linked to the promoter to enable expression of the product. Exemplary products include, but are not limited to S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase, aminocyclopropane-1 -carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ACC oxidase antisense molecule, ACC synthase antisense molecule, ACC oxidase cosuppression molecule, ACC synthase cosuppression molecule, thaumatin, sucrose phosphate synthase and lycopene cyclase.
In one embodiment, the promoters of the present invention can be used to reduce ethylene production in fruit cells.
In another embodiment, the DNA sequence can correspond to a pathogenesis related gene, such as polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP), glucanase and chitinase. The promoter of the present invention can be obtained from a gene homologous to a raspberry drul gene or from the drul raspberry gene itself. An exemplary drul promoter sequence is SEQ ID NO:22. Smaller fragments of such a promoter region may be derived from this sequence, where die smaller fragments are effective to regulate expression of a DNA sequence under their control. The present invention also includes the use of any of the above chimeric genes to generate a plant transformation vector. Such vectors can be used in any plant cell transformation method, including, Agrobacterium-based methods, electroporation, microinjection, and microprojectile bombardment. These vectors may form part of a plant transformation kit. Other components of the kit may include, but are not limited to, reagents useful for plant cell transformation. In another embodiment, the present invention includes a plant cell, plant tissue, transgenic plant, fruit cell, whole fruit, seeds or calli containing any of the above-described chimeric genes.
In anou er aspect of the present invention, the promoters described herein are employed in a method for modifying ripening fruit of a fruit bearing plant. In this method, transgenic plants containing the chimeric gene of d e present invention are grown to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit. In this embodiment, the chimeric gene encodes a product capable of reducing ethylene biosynthesis when expressed in plant cells (e.g., S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase, aminocyclopropane-1 -carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ACC oxidase antisense molecule, ACC synthase antisense molecule, ACC oxidase cosuppression molecule, ACC synthase cosuppression molecule). Fruit produced by these transgenic plants have a modified ripening phenotype. A modified ripening phenotype typically refers to an alteration of the rate of ripening of a transgenic fruit relative to corresponding (i.e., non-transgenic) wild-type fruit.
Further, the invention includes a method for producing a transgenic fruit-bearing plant. In this method the chimeric gene of the present invention, typically carried in an expression vector allowing selection in plant cells, is introduced into progenitor cells of selected plant. These progenitor cells are then grown to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit. The method may further comprise isolation of a drul promoter by the following steps:
(i) selecting a probe DNA molecule containing a sequence homologous to a region of raspberry drul gene DNA, (ii) contacting the probe with a plurality of target DNA molecules derived from the genome of a selected fruit-bearing plant under conditions favoring specific hybridization between the probe molecule and a target molecule homologous to the probe molecule,
(iii) identifying a target molecule having a DNA sequence homologous to the raspberry drul gene, and (iv) isolating promoter sequences associated with the target molecule.
In addition, the present invention includes isolation of a drul promoter by the steps just described.
The chimeric genes, vectors, products and methods of the present invention can also be produced using drul promoter sequences identified essentially as described herein for drul. These and other objects and features of die invention will be more fully appreciated when the following detailed description of the invention is read in conjunction widi the accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1 presents representative results of polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins.
Figures 2A and 2B schematically represent the Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Re¬ action (RT-PCR; Kawasaki, et al, 1989; Wang, etal, 1990) cloning of die raspberry drul gene.
Figures 3A and 3B present the genomic DNA sequence of the drul gene. Indicated in the figures are a CAAT box, TATA box, ATG start codon, two exons, an intron, splicing sites, a stop codon and poly-adenylation sites.
Figure 4 presents a schematic representation of the gene organization and protein structure of drul.
Figure 5 presents a Kyte-Doolittle hydrophilicity plot ofthe coding sequence o drul. In the figure, the hydrophilicity window size = 7. Figure 6 shows the results of RNA dot blot analysis of drul RNA expression in raspberry leaf and receptacle. RNA was isolated from green, mature green, breaker & orange/ripe raspberries (corresponding to stages I, II, III, IV, respectively).
Figure 7 shows the results of a RNA hybridization study evaluating the expression of drul RNA in raspberry leaf and fruit.
Figure 8 shows the results of polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins obtained from drupelets at various stages of ripening.
Figures 9A and 9B present a schematic description of the details of the vector construction for pAG-4032, and Figure 10 presents a schematic description of the details of the vector construction for pAG-
4033.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION I. DEFINITIONS
A "chimeric gene," in the context of the present invention, typically comprises a promoter sequence operably linked to "heterologous" DNA sequences, i.e., DNA sequences that encode a gene product not normally contiguous or associated with the promoter (e.g., a drul promoter adjacent DNA sequences encoding S-adenosylmediionine cleaving enzyme).
"drul homologous genes" are defined as genes that have at least about 55% or preferably
80% global sequence homology, that is, sequence identity over a length of the polynucleotide sequence to the raspberry drul polynucleotide sequences disclosed herein (e. g. , SEQ ID NO: 10).
"Sequence homology" is determined essentially as follows. Two polynucleotide sequences of the same length (preferably, corresponding to the coding sequences of the gene) are considered to be homologous to one another, if, when they are aligned using die ALIGN program, over 55% or preferably 80% of die nucleic acids in die highest scoring alignment are identically aligned using a ktup of 1, the default parameters and the default PAM matrix (Dayhoff, 1972).
The ALIGN program is found in the FASTA version 1.7 suite of sequence comparison programs (Pearson and Lipman, 1988; Pearson, 1990; program available from William R. Pearson, Department of Biological Chemistry, Box 440, Jordan Hall, Charlottesville, VA).
Two nucleic acid fragments are considered to be "selectively hybridizable" to a poly- nucleotide derived from a drul gene, if they are capable of specifically hybridizing to die coding sequences of the raspberry drul gene or a variant thereof or of specifically priming a polymerase chain amplification reaction: (i) under typical hybridization and wash conditions, as described, for example, in Maniatis, et al. (1982), pages 320-328, and 382-389. Examples of such hybridization conditions are also given in Examples 8 and 9; (ii) using reduced stringency wash conditions that allow at most about 25-30% basepair mismatches, for example: 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, room temperature twice, 30 minutes each; men 2 x SSC, 0.1% SDS, 37°C. once, 30 minutes; men 2 x SSC room temperature twice, 10 minutes each, or (iii) selecting primers for use in typical polymerase chain reactions (PCR) under standard conditions (for example, in Saiki, et al., 1988), which result in specific amplification of sequences o drul or its variants.
Preferably, highly homologous nucleic acid strands contain less than 20-40% basepair mismatches, even more preferably less than 5-20% basepair mismatches. These degrees of homology can be selected by using wash conditions of appropriate stringency for identification of clones from gene libraries (or o er sources of genetic material), as is well known in e art. A "drul encoded polypeptide" is defined herein as any polypeptide homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide. In one embodiment, a polypeptide is homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide if it is encoded by nucleic acid mat selectively hybridizes to sequences of drul or its variants.
In anoύ er embodiment, a polypeptide is homologous to a drul encoded polypeptide if it is encoded by drul or its variants, as defined above, polypeptides of mis group are typically larger than 15, preferable 25, or more preferable 35, contiguous amino acids. Further, for polypeptides longer an about 60 amino acids, sequence comparisons for me purpose of determining "polypeptide homology" are performed using die local alignment program LALIGN. The polypeptide sequence is compared against die drul amino acid sequence or any of its variants, as defined above, using d e LALIGN program with a ktup of 1 , default parameters and me default PAM.
Any polypeptide with an optimal alignment longer than 60 amino acids and greater than 55% or preferably 80% of identically aligned amino acids is considered to be a "homologous polypeptide." The LALIGN program is found in the FASTA version 1.7 suite of sequence comparison programs (Pearson and Lipman, 1988; Pearson, 1990; program available from William R. Pearson, Department of Biological Chemistry, Box 440, Jordan Hall, Charlottesville, VA).
A polynucleotide is "derived from" drul if it has the same or substantially the same basepair sequence as a region ofthe drul protein coding sequence, cDNA oidrul or complements thereof, or if it displays homology as noted above. A polypeptide or polypeptide "fragment" is "derived from" drul if it is (i) encoded by a drul gene, or (ii) displays homology to drul encoded polypeptides as noted above.
In d e context ofthe present invention, die phrase "nucleic acid sequences," when referring to sequences which encode a protein, polypeptide, or peptide, is meant to include degenerative nucleic acid sequences which encode homologous protein, polypeptide or peptide sequences as well as the disclosed sequence.
A "modified ripening" phenotype typically refers to an alteration of the rate of ripening of a transgenic fruit relative to corresponding wild-type fruit, such as, for example, delayed ripening fruit (i.e., ripening takes longer than corresponding wild-type fruit) or suspension of die fruit's ability to complete the ripening process.
A "product" encoded by a DNA molecule includes, for example, an RNA molecule or a polypeptide.
II. DRUI PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION, PURIFICATION AND SEQUENCE DETERMINATION. The present invention relates to die cloning of a gene expressed at very high levels in ripening fruit, exemplified by the drul gene from raspberries. Expression directed by die drul promoter described herein is fruit specific and active during fruit ripening.
Protein(s) such as those produced by raspberry are typically analyzed by gel electrophoresis. A coomassie blue-stained SDS polyacrylamide gel of soluble drupelet proteins is shown in Figure 1 (Example 1). Two highly abundant proteins isolable from raspberries are observed at approxi¬ mately 17 and 15 kd, and are referred to herein as drupel and drupe2, respectively. The amount of drupel and drupe2 relative to the total amount of soluble protein can be determined, for exam¬ ple, by scanning densitometry. Scanning densitometry analysis of die gel illustrated in Fig. 1 indicates mat drupel and drupe2 comprise approximately 23 and 37%, respectively, of the total soluble protein in raspberry drupelets. As a result of diis determination (i.e., die high levels of drupel and drupe2), purification and sequencing of drupel and drupe2 can be carried out, for example, by using a direct western blot approach.
In carrying out a western blot analysis, total drupelet proteins are western blotted to PDVF membrane (Example 1) and die regions corresponding to drupel and drupe2 are subjected to N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis. The drupel sample yields a diirty amino acid N-terminal sequence (Example 1). The amino terminal drupel sequence is presented herein as SEQ ID NO: 1.
III. CLONING DRUI ENCODING SEQUENCES.
A. RT-PCR AND CLONING OF A DRUI cDNA CLONE. The entire procedure for cloning drul, from cDNA syndiesis to inverse PCR of a genomic copy of the gene, is shown schematically in Figures 2 A and 2B.
In carrying out d e cloning procedure, mature green raspberry drupelet mRNA is prepared as described in Example 2 and used as template in a cDNA syndiesis reaction. The reaction is primed using the dTRANDOM primer shown in Figures 2A and 2B. The resulting cDNA (Example 2) is subjected to a standard PCR reaction using primers corresponding to a portion of die dTRANDOM primer and a 512-fold degenerate primer (Drupe 20) based on die drupel amino terminal sequence (Example 3).
The PCR amplification products are men analyzed. Products from the above PCR reaction include a 710 bp product that is agarose gel purified and subcloned into pCRJJ (Example 3). Subsequent sequence analysis of several of these clones allows identification of those clones whose sequence encodes a protein matching the amino terminal sequence of drupel.
B. INVERSE PCR CLONING OF A GENOMIC COPY OF THE DRUI GENE
In this approach to cloning the drul gene, genomic raspberry DNA is used in a PCR reaction using primers internal to the cDNA sequence obtained as described above (Example 4). This reaction produces a genomic clone of me drul gene containing most of the protein coding region. A single intron was identified from the subsequent sequence analysis of tiiis clone (Figure 3B). An inverse PCR strategy may be employed to characterize and sequence die 5' region of the gene containing the drul promoter (Example 5). Figures 2A and 2B show schematically how this may be accomplished.
In characterizing die 5' flanking region of drul genomic DNA utilizing inverse PCR techniques, raspberry genomic DNA is digested widi Nsil and ligated under dilute conditions to allow circularization of the restriction fragments. The ligated DNA is tiien subjected to PCR amplification using primers internal to the drul coding sequence and oriented in opposite directions from each other. This produces a PCR reaction product containing part of the first exon and 1.35 kb of the promoter. Subsequent sequence analysis of this clone in combination with sequence information from the previously described clones produces the complete drul sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12).
C. SEQUENCE DETERMINATION AND EVALUATION OF GENE EXPRESSION PATTERNS. The drul gene (SEQ ID NO: 12) encodes a protein with the predicted amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO: 13. The predicted molecular weight for tiiis protein is 17,088, which agrees closely with the 17kd molecular weight determined by gel electrophoresis (see Figure 1) of total drupelet protein. The drul protein is relatively acidic with a predicted pl of 4.8. Nucleic acid and protein homology searches of the current sequence databases can be carried out to look for significant matches. For drul, nucleic acid and protein homology searches of the current sequence databases produced no significant matches. This result supports die original observation made widi die amino terminal sequence of die protein that drupel is a novel protein.
The gene expression pattern oidrul can be also be evaluated at die RNA and protein levels to confirm the tissue specificity of the promoter. Northern dot blots, Figures 6 and 7, of total RNA from raspberry leaf and receptacles at different ripening stages indicate a tissue and stage specific gene expression pattern. This can be confirmed by comparison of northern blots of total RNA from various other plant tissues. The tissue and stage specific gene expression pattern of drul was confirmed on northern blots of total RNA from leaf, receptacles, and drupelets (see Figures 6 and 7). In both cases, no drul expression is observed in leaf RNA. The RNA expression pattern in receptacles is temporally regulated while in drupelets it is fully expressed at die two stages (i.e., green and ripe) analyzed.
A protein gel of drupelet lysates from different ripening stages can also be carried out to further support stage specific expression of drul. As illustrated in Figure 8, electrophoretic analysis of raspberry drupelet proteins obtained from drupelets at various stages of ripening (i.e. , green, mature green, breaker, orange, and ripe) further supports a stage specific expression pattern in drupelets (Figure 8).
The level of both protein and mRNA expression oidrul is very high. Aldiough not wishing to be bound by any particular mechanism for the observations described herein, tiiere are several possible mechanisms that may contribute to such high level protein and mRNA expression. One mechanistic possibility is that the drul promoter is a strong promoter. Data supporting this mechanism for protein and mRNA expression is discussed above.
D. PROMOTER ISOLATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF CHIMERIC GENES.
Characterization of die drul genomic clone allows isolation of die drul promoter. The promoter can then be used to regulate expression of heterologous genes. An exemplary drul promoter has the sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22.
In support of the present invention, two exemplary chimeric genes containing a drul promoter sequence operably linked to a heterologous DNA sequence, were constructed, drulpro:- SAMase and c/rκ7pro:PGIP (Example 7). S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase (SAMase) and poly- galacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP) confer ethylene control and fungal resistance, respectively, in transgenic plants. Botii proteins have been predicted to function more efficiently if expressed (i) in high levels and (ii) in a tissue specific manner. Accordingly, die drul promoter represents an ideal promoter to satisfy this objective.
Construction of Agrobacterium binary vectors, pAG-4032 and pAG-4033, containing the two representative chimeric genes described above, can be performed as described in Example 7 (schematically represented in Figures 9 and 10, drulpro: SAMase and rfruipro:PGIP, respectively). IV. IDENTIFICATION OF PLANT DRUI PROMOTERS
The present invention provides for die use of drul promoters from species other than raspberry. Such promoters are useful for the generation of vector constructs containing heterolo- gous genes. Southern blot experiments are used to demonstrate the presence of DNA molecules having significant sequence identity ( . e. , typically greater than 55 % , more preferably greater than 80% identity using standard sequence comparison programs) with the raspberry drul gene in, for example, strawberry, peach or plum. Similar Southern blot analyses may be performed on other fruit-bearing plants to identify additional drul genes.
A Southern blot analysis used herein is detailed in Example 8. drul homologues are identified in a Southern blot of the genomic DNA of the plants listed above probed with a labelled DNA fragment containing the coding sequence of the raspberry drul gene.
The probe is selected to contain the coding sequence of drul, rather than the promoter sequence, because coding sequences are typically more conserved from species to species than are promoter sequences. In the experiments detailed in Examples 8 and 9, probe molecules are generated from raspberry genomic DNA using primer-specific amplification (Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al., 1987). The oligonucleotide primers are selected such that the amplified region includes the entire coding sequence ofthe raspberry drul gene. Primers may also be selected to amplify only a selected region of die raspberry drul gene.
Alternatively, a probe can be made by isolating restriction-digest fragments containing the sequence of interest from plasmid DNA.
The probe is labeled with a detectable moiety to enable subsequent identification of homologous target molecules. Exemplary labeling moieties include radioactive nucleotides, such as ^-labeled nucleotides, digoxygenin-labeled nucleotides, biotinylated nucleotides, and die like, available from commercial sources.
In the case of primer-amplified probes, labeled nucleotides may be directly incorporated into the probe during the amplification process. Probe molecules derived from DNA that has already been isolated, such as restriction-digest fragments from plasmid DNA, are typically end-labeled (Ausubel, et al., 1992).
Target molecules, such as Hindlll DNA fragments from the genomes of the above-listed plants, are electrophoresed on a gel, blotted, and immobilized onto a nylon or nitrocellulose filter.
Labeled probe molecules are then contacted with the target molecules under conditions favoring specific hybridization between the probe molecules and target molecules homologous to the probe molecules (Maniatis, et al., 1982; Sambrook, et al, 1989; Ausubel, et al., 1992).
Conditions favoring specific hybridization are referred to as moderately to highly stringent, and are affected primarily by the salt concentration and temperature of tiie wash buffer (Ausubel, et al , 1992; Sambrook, et al. , 1989). Conditions such as those used in the final wash in Example 9 are typically classified as moderately stringent, due to the low salt concentration, and are expected to preserve only specific hybridization interactions, allowing the identification and isolation of homologous genes in different plant species.
Following contacting, hybridization, and washing, target molecules with sequences homologous to the probe are identified by detecting die label on the probe. The label may be detected directly, for example, as in a radioactive label detected on autoradiograms, or it may be detected with a secondary moiety, for example, fluorescently-labeled streptavidin binding to a bio¬ tinylated probe.
Following the identification of plants containing drul genes, the DNA containing die desired genes, including the promoter regions, may be isolated from the respective species, by, for example, the methods described herein for the isolation of the raspberry drul gene.
Typically, a library of interest (e.g., genomic or cDNA) is screened with a probe containing sequences corresponding to the coding sequence of a known drul gene, such as tiie raspberry drul gene (Example 9). The screening is done using known metiiods (Ausubel, et al , 1992; Sambrook, et al, 1989), essentially as described above. Positive plaques or colonies are isolated, and die insert DNA is sequenced and compared to known drul sequences. Clones containing inserts with sequences corresponding to genes homologous to raspberry drul are identified and, if necessary, used to obtain additional clones until the promoter region of interest is isolated.
Variants of the drul promoter may be isolated from different raspberry cultivars and from other plants by the methods described above. A reporter gene, such as GUS (/S-glucuronidase), can be used to test tissue and/or stage specific (e.g., stages of fruit ripening) regulatable expression from such promoters. Expression of GUS protein can be easily measured by fluorometric, spec- trophotometric or histochemical assays (Jefferson, 1987a, 1987b).
Further, using chimeric genes containing drul promotor sequences operably linked to reporter gene sequences, DNA sequences corresponding to regulatory domains can be identified using, for example, deletion analysis (Benfey, et al., 1990). For example, the drul promoter sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22 can be functionally linked to die GUS reporter gene. Deletion analysis can then be carried out by standard methods (Ausubel, et al, 1992; Maniatis, et al., 1982; Sambook, et al). Alternatively, regions of the drul promoter sequence can be amplified using sequence-specific primers in PCR. These amplified fragments can then be inserted 5' to the GUS coding sequences and the resulting expression patterns evaluated. V. PLANT TRANSFORMATION AND THE GENERATION OF TRANSGENIC PLANTS. A. THE VECTORS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION.
Plant transformation vectors, containing drul promoter/transcription-regulatory sequences, are constructed according to metiiods known in the art (see, for example, Houck and Pear, 1990, and Becker, et al. , 1992).
The present invention provides vectors suitable for the transformation of plants. The vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs of the present invention are also useful for the expression of heterologous genes. Transgenic plants, and their fruit products, carrying the chimeric genes of the present invention, may be a useful source of recombinantly-expressed material. In one embodiment, die chimeric genes of die present invention have two components: (i) a promoter derived from a drul gene, and (ii) a heterologous DNA sequence encoding a desirable product.
The vectors of the present invention may be constructed to carry an expression cassette containing an insertion site for DNA coding sequences of interest. The transcription of such inserted DNA is then under the control of a suitable drul promoter (i.e., raspberry drul gene promoter or homologs thereof).
Such expression cassettes may have single or multiple transcription termination signals at the coding-3'-end ofthe DNA sequence being expressed. Such 3' sequences may include transcription termination sequences derived from the 3' non-coding region of die drul gene encoded mRNA. The expression cassette may also include, for example, DNA sequences encoding (i) a leader sequence (e.g., to allow secretion or vacuolar targeting), and (ii) translation termination signals.
Further, the vectors of the present invention may include selectable markers for use in plant cells (such as, the nptll kanamycin resistance gene). The vectors may also include sequences that allow their selection and propagation in a secondary host, such as, sequences containing an origin of replication and a selectable marker. Typical secondary hosts include bacteria and yeast. In one embodiment, the secondary host is Escherichia coli, the origin of replication is a colEl -type, and the selectable marker is a gene encoding ampicillin resistance. Such sequences are well known in the art and are commercially available as well (e.g., Clontech, Palo Alto, CA; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The vectors of the present invention may also be modified to intermediate plant transforma¬ tion plasmids that contain a region of homology to an Agrobacterium tumefaciens vector, a T-DNA border region from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and chimeric genes or expression cassettes (described above). Further, the vectors of the invention may comprise a disarmed plant tumor inducing plasmid oi Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Other suitable vectors may be constructed using die promoters of the present invention and standard plant transformation vectors, which are available both commercially (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) and from academic sources (Waksman Institute, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ).
The vectors of the present invention are useful for tissue and/or stage-specific expression of nucleic acid coding sequences in plant cells. For example, a selected peptide or polypeptide coding sequence can be inserted in an expression cassette of a vector ofthe present invention. The vector is then transformed into host cells, the host cells cultured under conditions to allow the expression ofthe protein coding sequences, and the expressed peptide or polypeptide isolated from the cells. Transformed progenitor cells can also be used to produce transgenic plants bearing fruit. In one aspect of the invention, fruit produced by such transgenic plants has a reduced level of ethylene synthesis by the fruit. The fruit then demonstrates a modified ripening phenotype.
The vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs of the present invention can be sold individually or in kits for use in plant cell transformation and the subsequent generation of transgenic plants. B. HETEROLOGOUS GENES.
The methods and results described herein demonstrate the ability to provide tissue and/or stage specific regulation of gene expression in transgenic plants. The tissue and/or stage-specific promoters of the present invention include a region of DNA that regulates transcription of the immediately adjacent (downstream) gene to a specific plant tissue. According to metiiods of the present invention, heterologous genes are linked to the promoters of the present invention. Exemplary heterologous gene for the transformation of plants include genes whose products are effective to reduce ethylene biosynthesis in specific tissues of those plants, e.g. the fruits. Some of these genes, including AdoMetase, are discussed above.
Otiier genes of interest that could be used in conjunction with the drul promoter include, but are not limited to, the following: other ripening modification genes, in addition to AdoMetase, such as, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase (Klee, et al., 1991; Sheehy, et al., 1991), which degrades precursors of ethylene biosynthesis; ripening modification through the use of gene inactivation methods including antisense or cosuppression affecting genes of the eth¬ ylene biosynthetic pathway such as the genes endoding ACC synthase (Sato and Theologis, 1989) or ACC oxidase (Hamilton, et al, 1990). Further, the usefulness of genes involved in conferring fungal resistance (e.g., the polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP) from Phaseolus vulgaris (Toubart, et al., 1992) and modified forms of plant glucanase, chitinase and other pathogenesis related (PR) genes (Melchers, et al, 1993, 1994; Ponstein, et al., 1994; Woloshuk, et al., 1991) would be improved when used with a high-level, fruit-specific promoter such as drul. In addition, antisense or cosuppression genes encoding proteins responsible for degradative processes in the fruit may also be used in conjunction with the promoters of the present invention.
Examples of genes of this type include polygalacturonase, cellulase, and pectin methyl esterase
(Schuch, 1994). Use of the promoters of the present invention targets inhibition of the specific degradation process to only ripening fruit.
Other gene products which may be useful to express using the promoters of the present invention include genes encoding (i) flavor (e.g., thaumatin; GENBANK) or color modification (e.g., products that modify lycopene synthesis, for example, arabidopsis lycopene cyclase; GENBANK), (ii) enzymes or other catalytic products (such as, ribozymes or catalytic antibodies) that modify plant cell processes, (iii) gene products that affect ethylene production, such as antisense molecules, enzymes that degrade precursors of ethylene biosynthesis, catalytic products or cosuppression molecules, (iv) alternative fungal control genes, and (v) sucrose accumulating genes, such as the sucrose phosphate synthase gene (GENBANK) from corn.
Further, it is useful to restrict expression of some genes to specific tissues, such as the fruit- for example, any gene that would be deleterious to the plant if it were expressed constitutively.
Such genes would include genes which encoded degradative enzymes diat deplete necessary metabolites. Derivatives of the drul promoter region can be used as on/off switches for the tissue and/or stage-specific expression of genes whose expression is under their control.
C. METHODS OF TRANSFORMING PLANTS A number of methods, in addition to Agrobacterium-based methods, may be employed to elicit transformation of plant progenitor cells, such as electroporation, microinjection, and microprojectile bombardment. These methods are well known in the art (Comai and Coning, 1993; Klein, et al, 1988; Miki, et al 1987; Bellini, et al., 1989) and provide the means to introduce selected DNA into plant genomes: such DNA may include a DNA cassette which con- sists of a drul gene promoter functionally adjacent to heterologous sequences encoding a desired product, for example, AdoMetase coding sequences. Transformants and resulting transgenic cells and transgenic plants are identified and evaluated by standard methods (Mathews, et al., 1995).
D. EXPRESSION IN HETEROLOGOUS PLANT SYSTEMS.
Experiments performed in support ofthe present invention demonstrate the versatility of the chimeric gene constructs of the invention. The vector constructs of the present invention can be used for transformation and expression of heterologous sequences in transgenic plants independent of the original plant source for the promoter sequence. Further, the expression mediated by the promoter appears to be tissue and/or stage-specific even in heterologous plants. Accordingly, the vectors, chimeric genes and DNA constructs ofthe present invention are useful for transformation of species of fruit-bearing plants, where such plants are different species than the plant source of the promoter sequences. VI. UTILITY The present invention relates to the cloning of a gene expressed at very high levels in ripening fruit, e.g., raspberries. The gene isolated from raspberry was designated drul and encodes a protein with a molecular weight of 17kd. Analysis of protein expression in raspberry drupelets indicates drul comprises at least 23% of the total protein. Combined with dru2, an apparently similar 15kd protein expressed at even higher levels, these two proteins comprise at least 65% ofthe protein in raspberry drupelets. This is an unusually high level of gene expression for any plant tissue otiier than seed storage proteins.
Experiments performed in support of the present invention demonstrate that the gene expression patterns of the mature protein and mRNA encoded by the drul gene are strictly regulated to the receptacles and drupelets of ripening raspberries. Accordingly, use of die drul promoter allows the targeting of foreign gene expression to fruit tissues (i.e., when such foreign gene is placed under the control of the drul promoter). The dru2 gene and corresponding promoter regions may be characterized essentially as described herein for drul. drul can be cloned as described above employing N-terminal amino acid sequence information and corresponding degenerate PCR primers used in RT-PCR reactions to obtain a cDNA clone. Inverse PCR can be used to obtain a genomic clone of the gene including the drul promoter.
The drul gene represents an import discovery in the field of agricultural biotechnology from several standpoints. First, the drul promoter can be used to express any heterologous gene whose function would be enhanced or enabled by a high level, tissue specific promoter. Two examples of such genes have been described herein: the SAMase gene (for control of ethylene synthesis and therefore ripening control), and the PGIP gene (for fungal control, specifically gray mold or Botrytis cinerea). Other exemplary genes are described above.
Second, the use of this promoter cannot be considered limited to raspberries. The raspberry is essentially a miniature drupe fruit so it is likely that the drul promoter will function in other drupe fruits. The constructs and metiiods of the present invention are applicable to all higher plants including, but not limited to, the following: Berry-like fruits, for example, Vitis (grapes), Fragaria (strawberries), Rubus (raspberries, blackberries, loganberries), Ribes (currants and gooseberries), Vaccinium, (blueberries, bilberries, whortleberries, cranberries), Actinida Qάwiir it and Chinese gooseberry). Further, other drupe fruits, including, but not limited to, Malus (apple), Pyrus (pears), most members of the Prunus genera, sapota, mango, avocado, apricot, peaches, cherries, plums, and nectarines. Control of etiiylene production via, for example, a drulpio- :SAMase chimera would be valuable in climacteric fruits (e.g., peaches and plums) which suffer from over-ripening in post-harvest distribution systems.
Further, the results described herein that the drul gene is expressed in receptacles makes it likely that the promoter will function in strawberries. The strawberry fruit is a swollen receptacle that is indistinguishable, from a botanical standpoint, from the raspberry receptacle. All drupe fruits (e.g. , raspberries) and strawberries are members ofthe Rosacea genera thus making the drul promoter likely to function as a fruit specific promoter in heterologous species of this genera.
The present invention provides compositions and methods to regulate plant cell expression of any gene in a tissue and/or stage-specific manner. In one embodiment, the invention teaches the use of the drul tissue and stage-specific promoter whose expression is induced during fruit ripening.
In one embodiment, the promoters of the present invention can be used to regulate cellular production of ethylene. In this embodiment, a gene whose product results in a reduction of ethyl- ene synthesis is operably linked to a drul promoter (creating a chimeric gene). When the chimeric gene is present in fruit cells, the result is fruit having a modified ripening phenotype relative to wild-type (non-transgenic) fruit.
Exemplary gene products that result in reduction of ethylene synthesis include, but are not limited to the following: S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase; 1-aminocyclopropane-l-carboxylate deaminase (Klee, et al., 1991; Sheehy, et al, 1991); tiie ACC synthase gene in an antisense or cosuppression configuration (Oeller, et al, 1991; Van der Straeten, et al, 1990); and die ACC oxidase gene in either an antisense or cosuppression configuration (Hamilton, et al, 1990; Holdsworth, et al, 1987). Cosuppression has been described by Jorgensen, et al (1991, 1993).
Other gene products that may be useful in the reduction of ethylene biosynthesis include catalytic antibodies and ribozyme molecules.
The present invention provides, in one aspect, nucleic acid constructs suitable for trans¬ forming plants with heterologous genes under the control of a drul promoter. In one embodiment, the plant is a fruit-bearing plant, and the heterologous gene is a gene effective to reduce ethylene biosynthesis in fruit from the plant. Experiments performed in support of the present invention describe the construction of chimeric gene constructs containing the Adometase (or SAMase) gene, isolated from bacteriophage T3 (Ferro, et al (1995); Hughes, et al, 1987).
The drul promoter may be employed in vector constructs used to produce transgenic plants, such as transgenic raspberries. For example, a vector engineered according to methods of die present invention containing the drul promoter connected to the AdoMetase gene (e.g. vector pAG-4032), may be used to produce transgenic raspberries, strawberries, peaches, plums and the like. The AdoMetase gene will be expressed in the fruit of these transgenic plants and will delay ripening. An advantage ofthe method of the present invention compared to other ripening inhibi- tion approaches, namely antisense and/or cosuppression of ACC oxidase and ACC synthase, is a savings of time and resources involved in vector construction, since the same vector can be used to transform many different plant types.
Alternatively, drul promoter sequences may be isolated from the same type of plant that is to be transformed, and incorporated into the vector constructs used to perform the transformations. For example, a strawberry drul promoter may be connected to a heterologous gene, such as the
AdoMetase gene, and used to transform strawberries.
The following examples illustrate, but in no way are intended to limit die present invention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Operon Technologies, Inc., Alameda, CA. Generally, the nomenclature and laboratory procedures with respect to standard recombinant
DNA technology can be found in Sambrook, et al, (1989); Wang, et al. (1989); Kawasaki, et al
(1989), and in Gelvin and Schilperoot (1988). Other general references are provided throughout this document. The procedures therein are known in die art and are only provided for convenient reference.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1
Raspberry Drupelet Protein Characterization and Purification A. PROTEIN LYSATE PREPARAΉON AND GEL ELECTROPHORESIS.
Using a mortar and pestle containing liquid nitrogen, a raspberry protein sample was prepared by grinding the frozen drupes of one whole berry into a fine powder. Sample buffer (0.05 M Tris, pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 5% beta-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol; Laemelli, 1970) was added (900 μls) to the tissue and the sample mixed by vortexing. The sample was heated for 10 minutes at 90-95 °C and centrifuged at 14K φm, 4°C for 10 minutes. The supernatant was re¬ moved from the insoluble debris pellet and stored at -20°C.
Drupelet proteins were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electro¬ phoresis (SDS PAGE) combined widi coomassie blue staining using standard procedures for these steps. A coomassie blue-stained SDS polyacrylamide gel of soluble drupelet proteins is shown in Figure 1. In the figure: lane 1, molecular weight markers (BioRad, Richmond, CA), lanes 2, 3 and 5 each contain 9 μg of raspberry drupelet protein lysate prepared separately from individual fruit. Lane 4 had a higher amount of lysate.
Two highly abundant proteins were observed at approximately 17 and 15 kd and were named drupel and drupe2, respectively. In Figure 1 these two proteins are indicated by arrows. Scanning densitometry analysis of this gel indicated drupel and drupe2 comprise approximately 23 and 37%, respectively, of die total soluble protein in raspberry drupelets. As a result of this determination, a direct western blot approach to purification and sequencing of the protein was taken.
B. PROTEIN BLOT FOR SEQUENCING. A protein blot (Applied Biosystems, Inc. User Bulletin Number 58; Ausubel, et al. , 1992) was prepared using the raspberry protein lysate described above. Varying amounts of raspberry protein lysate (12-36 μg/well) were loaded on a 10 well 18% SDS-PAGE minigel (1.5 mm thick) with 4.5% stacker and electrophoresed at 100 volts in 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS buffer for 2-2.5 hours. Proteins weretransblotted onto AppliedBioSystem's "PROBLOTT" polyvinylidenedifluor.de
(PVDF) membrane in a 25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 10% methanol buffer at 90 volts for 2 hours at 4°C. After protein transfer, the blot was Coomassie blue stained and the 15 and 17 kilo- dalton (kd) protein bands were located on the blot and cut out. N-terminal sequencing of the proteins was carried out at the W.M. Keck Foundation, Biotechnology Resource Laboratory in New Haven, CT.
The drupel sample yielded a thirty amino acid N-terminal sequence. The drupe2 sample did not yield useful sequence information likely due to a blocked amino terminus. The amino terminal drupel sequence is presented as SEQ ID NO:l. This 30 amino acid drupel sequence was compared to the protein database using BLAST searching; no significant matches were found indicating that drupel is a novel protein.
EXAMPLE 2 Recovering a cDNA Clone Corresponding to the Drupel Protein A. DRUPELET TOTAL RNA PREPARATION.
RNA was extracted from mature green raspberry drupelets. Four mature green raspberry fruit, which had been picked in season and stored at -80°C, were used to extract RNA. The estimated weight of the drupelets was 12 grams. In a cold mortar, which contained liquid nitrogen, the whole berries were fractured by tapping them with a pestle. The drupelets were separated from the receptacles. The receptacles were removed from the mortar and discarded. The drupelets were ground to a powder in the mortar, adding liquid nitrogen as necessary to keep the tissue frozen. The seeds were puφosefully left intact. Homogenization buffer, 2 ml/gram of tissue, was used to extract the RNA. [Homogenization buffer: 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 300 mM LiCl, 10 mM NaaEDTA, 1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, 1.5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 8.5% (w/v) insoluble polyvinylpolypyrollidone (PVPP), 1% (v/v) NP-40, 1 M aurintricarboxylic acid (ATA), 5 mM thiourea, and 10 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); the last three components were added after autoclaving].
The frozen powdered drupelet tissue was added to the buffer in 3 to 5 portions, vortexing between additions until all tissue was moistened. The tissue plus buffer solution (referred to herein as the pulp) was diluted 1:1 with sterile water and 0.75 volumes of homogenization buffer were added to the diluted pulp. The sample was incubated at 65°C for 10 to 15 minutes, followed by centrifugation in a swinging bucket rotor at 9000 g for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube. Cesium chloride (CsCl) was added to the supernatant at 0.2 g/ml. The sample was mixed until die CsCl dissolved.
A 4 ml cushion was dispensed into a Beckman 1 x 3.5 inch polyallomer ultracentrifuge tube (cushion: 5.7 M CsCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM NajEDTA, pH 8.). The sample was gently layered on top of the cushion. The sample was spun in a Beckman L8-80M ultracentrifuge with a SW 28 rotor at 23,000 m at 20°C for 20 hours. After removing the sample from the ultracentrifuge the supernatant was pulled off the sample by using a drawn Pasteur pipette attached to an aspirator. A clear lens-like pellet was visible in die bottom of the tube. The pellet was dissolved in 500 μl SSTE and transferred to a microfuge tube (SSTE: 0.8 M
NaCl, 0.4% SDS, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 and 1 mM NajEDTA, pH 8). The sample was extracted twice with an equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1). To precipitate the RNA, 2.5 volumes ethanol were added to the aqueous phase. The sample was collected by centrifugation, washed two times widi 75% ethanol and resuspended in 100 μl TE. The yield was 1.6 mg. The RNA was re-precipitated widi 1/9 volume 3 M Sodium Acetate and 3 volumes ethanol for storage at -20°C.
B. DRUPELET MRNA PREPARATION.
The isolation of mRNA from mature green raspberry drupelet total RNA was performed using the "STRAIGHT A'S" mRNA isolation system (Novagen, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's instructions. mRNA was isolated from the 1.6 mg of total RNA extracted from mature green raspberry drupelets described above. The yield of mRNA from this procedure was
6.6 μg.
C. MAKING cDNA FROM GREEN RASPBERRY DRUPELET MRNA. The mRNA from mature green raspberry drupelet RNA was used as the template for cDNA synthesis. The primer for the cDNA reactions was dTRANDOM (SEQ ID NO:2; synthesized by
Operon Technologies, Inc., Alameda, CA). The oligo(dT) region hybridized to the poly(A) region of the mRNA pool. The other 15 nucleotides created a 5* overhang that was used to facilitate PCR amplification at a later step in the cloning process.
The following reaction mixture was assembled for the cDNA synthesis reaction: H20, 10.2 μl; 250 ng mRNA, 0.8 μl; 5 x BRL RT buffer (BRL, Bethesda, MD), 4.0 μl; 100 mM DTT (dithiothreitol - BRL, Bethesda, MD), 0.2 μl; "RNAguard" (23.4 U/μl; an RNase inhibitor from Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), 0.5 μl; dNTP's (2.5 mM each), 2.0 μl; 50 μM primer, 1.0 μl; [^JdCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; DuPont/NEN, Boston, MA), 1.0 μl; and AMV-reverse-transcriptase (38 U/μl; Life Sciences, Inc., St. Petersburg, Florida), 0.3 μl. The cDNA reaction was performed by combining mRNA and water for the reaction and heating to 65CC for 3 minutes. The mixture was cooled on ice and microfuged (to collect condensation). The remaining reaction components were then added. After incubating at 42°C for 1 hour the cDNA reactions were moved to ice and stored at 4°C prior to their use in PCR reactions.
EXAMPLE 3 PCR Amplification and Cloning of the cDNA Drul Fragment A degenerate PCR primer, Drupe20, was designed for the 5' end of the cDNA based on the reverse translation of the drul protein sequence. A section of the known amino acid sequence of drul (SEQ ID NO:3) was chosen for its proximity to the amino terminus and for the relatively low level of degeneracy in its reverse-translated sequence (SEQ ID NO:4; Drupe20). The Drupe20 primer (i) is the 512-fold degenerate nucleotide sequence corresponding to the amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:3, and (ii) was used as the 3'-primer. The 5' PCR primer (DrupeRAN18, SEQ ID NO:5, corresponding to the cDNA primer, dTRANDOM) was designed for die 3' end. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT; Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al, 1987, was performed following the manufacturer's procedure using "AMPLITAQ" (Perkin Elmer Cetus), PCR buffer II (50.0 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3), 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, mature green drupelet cDNA and Drupe20 and DrupeRAN18 primers under the following conditions:
1 cycle at 95 °C, 1 minute, 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 minute, 42 °C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute, 1 cycle at 72°C for 5 minutes, and cooling to 5°C. There were two major products of the amplification reaction: a predominant product of approximately 700 bp and a less abundant product of approximately 500 bp. The 700 bp band was isolated from a 1 % "SEAPLAQUE" agarose gel using β-agarase (NEB, Beverly, MA) according to the supplier's instructions. This fragment was then ligated to the vector pCRII, the TA cloning vector from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA), following the manufacturer's instructions.
The cDNA clones of the drul gene were identified by screening plasmid miniprep DNA prepared from 1.6 ml of culture using the alkaline lysis method (Ausubel, et al., 1992). The double-stranded DNA was sequenced by die dideoxy chain-termination method using die "SEQUENASE" ver.2 enzyme and kit components (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, Ohio) and [α-35S]-dATP (DuPont/NEN). The reactions were primed with the M13 universal forward and reverse primers (NEB, Beverly, MA). Sequencing reactions were resolved on an acrylamide gel ("LONG RANGER GEL," FMC, Rockland, Maine) and bands detected by autoradiography.
The sequence was read from the autoradiograph and analyzed for its homology with the reverse translated N-terminal protein sequence from drupel. The actual DNA sequence was determined, as opposed to the degenerate DNA sequence obtained through reverse translation of the protein sequence. In addition, the correlation between the cDNA and the remainder of the N-terminal protein sequence was confirmed. A clone (designated pAG-301) was selected, follow¬ ing these criteria, for further characterization. The nucleic acid sequence ofthe drul cDNA insert of pAG-301 is presented as SEQ ID NO: 10. The entire drul cloning procedure from cDNA synthesis to inverse PCR of a genomic copy of the gene is shown schematically in Figures 2A and 2B.
EXAMPLE 4
Recovering the Genomic DNA Fragment Corresponding to the drul cDNA The "CTAB" (hexadecyl-trimetiiyl-ammonium bromide) method (Doyle and Doyle, 1990) was used to extract DNA from raspberry leaves. PCR primers (DruGenS', SEQ ID NO:6; Dru- Gen3', SEQ ID NO:7) were designed based upon the complete drul cDNA sequence. "OLIGO," a multi-functional program from National Biosciences, Inc. (Plymouth, MN), was used to facilitate design of the primers. PCR was performed following the manufacturer's procedure using "AMPLITAQ" (Perkin-Elmer Cetus), PCR buffer (50.0 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, and 1.5 mM MgClj), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, raspberry genomic DNA and DruGen5' and DruGen3' primers under the following ("HOT START") conditions:
1 cycle of 97°C for 5 minutes, after which the "AMPLITAQ" was added,
2 cycles of 97°C for 1 minute, 52°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute, 25 cycles of 94°C for 1 minute, 52°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute, 1 cycle of 72 °C for 5 minutes, and cooling to 5°C.
This amplification reaction produced 3 major products: a predominant product of 710 bp and 2 less abundant products of 690 and 625 bp. The PCR reaction products were then ligated to the vector pCRII, the TA cloning vector from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA), following the manufacturer's instructions. A clone was selected widi a 710 bp insert and designated pAG-302.
Plasmid DNA of pAG-302 was prepared from 1.6 ml of culture using the alkaline lysis method (Ausubel, et al. , 1992) and sequenced by the dideoxy chain-termination method using
"SEQUENASE" ver.2 enzyme and kit components (USB, Cleveland, Ohio) and [α-35S]-dATP
(DuPont NEN). The sequencing reactions were primed with the M13 universal forward and reverse primers (NEB, Beverly, MA). Further sequencing reactions were primed with 2 additional internal primers. Sequencing reactions were resolved on an acrylamide gel and detected through autoradiography.
The sequence of the drul genomic DNA insert in pAG-302 is presented as SEQ ID NO: 11. The sequence of the clone demonstrated that a genomic DNA fragment corresponding to die drul cDNA had been isolated.
EXAMPLE 5 Recovering the 5' Flanking Region of the drul Genomic DNA Through Inverse PCR Inverse PCR primers (designated DruInvUp, SEQ ID NO:8, and DruInvLow, SEQ ID NO:9) were designed based upon die genomic DNA sequence and optimized using OLIGO. Genomic raspberry DNA was digested with restriction enzyme ΪVMI. Nsil was chosen because, based on the cDΝA sequence, Nsil was known to cut in the 3'-untranslated region of tiie gene. A small portion ofthe Nsil digested DΝA was run on an analytical agarose gel and a Southern transfer was performed (Ausubel, et al, 1992).
The Southern blot was probed with the cDΝA fragment contained in pAG-302. The probe identified a Nsil fragment of about 2-2.3 kb: this fragment hybridized strongly with the genomic clone. A second, smaller fragment hybridized to the probe as well but hybridized weakly with the genomic clone.
The remaining Njil-digested raspberry DΝA was electrophoresed on a 1 %"SEAPLAQUE" agarose gel (FMC, Rockland, ME). Using a BstEll lambda size standard as a guide, the digested DΝA in the range of 2-2.3 kb was excised from the gel. The DΝA was purified using β-agarase (ΝEB, Beverly, MA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The DΝA was self ligated at a relatively dilute concentration (1 μg/ml) to bias the formation of circular ligation reaction products (Ochman, et al., 1990). Inverse PCR was subsequently performed on the self-ligated, Nϊil-digested, size-selected, genomic raspberry DNA. "AMPLITAQ" from Perkin Elmer Cetus was used to amplify the DNA.
The manufacturer's procedure was followed using PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, raspberry genomic DNA (prepared as described herein), and DruInvUp and DruInvLow primers. The following ("HOT START") reaction conditions were employed:
One cycle at 97°C for 5 minutes, after which the "AMPLrTAQ" was added, 2 cycles at 97 °C for 1 minute, 58 °C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute, 25 cycles at 94°C for 1 minute, 58°C for 1 minute and 72°C for 1 minute, 1 cycle at 72CC for 5 minutes, and cooling to 5°C. This reaction produced 2 major amplification products, one of 1.8 kb and one of 900 bp.
The 1.8 kb band was isolated from a 1 % "SEAPLAQUE" agarose gel using β-agarase. This fragment was ligated to pCRII to give rise to pAG-310.
The pAG-310 insert was sequenced in its entirety (SEQ ID NO: 12) and the drul insert sequence was found to be identical to the cDNA clone (SEQ ID NO: 10) and the genomic clone (SEQ ID NO: 11) in the regions where sequence was shared. The normal elements of plant genes and their regulatory components were identified (Figures 3A and 3B) including a CAAT box, TATA box, ATG start codon, two exons, an intron, splicing sites, a stop codon and poly¬ adenylation sites.
The gene organization and protein structure oidrul is schematically displayed in Figure 4. The gene encodes a protein having the predicted amino acid sequence presented as SEQ ID NO: 13. The predicted protein has a calculated molecular weight of 17,087.64 and an estimated pi of 4.80. A Kyte-Doolittle hydrophobicity plot of the drul protein is presented as Figure 5.
EXAMPLE 6 Characterization of drul Gene Expression A. RNA DOT BLOTS.
RNA dot blots were prepared using 5μg of total raspberry leaf RNA and 5 μg each of total receptacle RNA from green, mature green, breaker & orange/ripe raspberries (corresponding to stages I, II, III, IV, respectively, in Figure 6). The blots were probed with the drul cDNA fragment, labeled with [32-P]dCTP (> 3000 Ci/mmole) by die random primed method (Boeringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Random Primed reaction kit, Indianapolis, IN).
The blots were allowed to hybridize overnight at 45 °C in "HYBRISOL I" (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). A probe concentration of 1.2 x IO7 DPM/ml was used. The blot was washed after the overnight hybridization with a final wash using 0.1 x SSC at 42 °C for 1 hour. The hybridizing probe was detected through standard autoradiographic methods. The exposure of the blot to film was for 4 hours and 10 minutes with an intensifying screen at -80°C.
The results of this analysis are shown in Figure 6. In the figure the RNA dots are, respec¬ tively from left to right, leaf RNA and receptacle RNA from green (Figure 6, "I"), mature green (Figure 6, "II"), breaker (Figure 6, "III") and orange/ripe raspberries (Figure 6, "IV").
B. FURTHER RNA HYBRIDIZATION ANALYSIS.
A plant RNA extraction method (Chang, et al., 1993) was used for receptacles and leaves. The raspberry drupelet RNA extraction method described above was used for the drupelets and raspberry fruit. A Northern blot was prepared using 5 μg/lane of each sample RNA. The RNA samples were as follows: raspberry leaf (Figure 7, lane 1), mature green raspberry receptacles (Figure 7, lane 2), orange/ripe raspberry receptacles (Figure 7, lane 3), mature green raspberry drupelets (Figure 7, lane 4), and orange/ripe raspberry drupelets (Figure 7, lane 5).
The blot was probed with the drul cDNA fragment, labeled with [^JdCTP (> 3000 Ci/mmole) by random primed reactions. Hybridization was carried out overnight at 45 °C in "HYBRISOL I" (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). A probe concentration of 4.2 x IO6 DPM/ml was used. The blot was washed after the overnight hybridization with a final wash using 0.1 x SSC at 50°C for 30 minutes. The hybridizing probe was detected through standard autoradiographic methods. The exposure of the blot to film was for 1 hour at room temperature without an intensifying screen.
The results of this analysis are presented in Figure 7 and support a stage specific expression pattern in drupelets.
C. PROTEIN EXPRESSION ANALYSIS.
Protein lysates were prepared (as described in Example 1) from raspberry drupelets at various stages of ripening. The lysates were size-fractionated by PAGE and the gel stained widi Coomaise blue (50% MeOH, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.3, 1.5 mM MgC12). The results of this work are presented in Figure 8. In the figure the lysates in the lanes were as follows: lane 1, green drupelet; lane 2, mature green drupelet; lane 3, breaker drupelet; lane 4, orange drupelet; and lane 5, ripe drupelet. The results of this analysis supports a stage specific expression pattern in drupe- lets. EXAMPLE 7 Chimeric Genes Containing the drul Promoter A. CONSTRUCTION OF A DRU1PRO:SAMASE BINARY VECTOR.
A fragment containing the Drul promoter was PCR amplified from pAG-310 using primers DruPro5'RI (SEQ ID NO: 14) and DruPro3' (SEQ ID NO: 15) and standard PCR reaction condi¬ tions. The amplification reaction produced a 1.3 kb fragment product. This fragment was digested to completion with EcoRI and Ncol. The digested fragment was ligated into pAG-112, a pUC vector carrying an AdoMetase encoding gene (Ferro, et al, 1995) with a nos terminator. The resulting plasmid was designated pAG-119. pAG-119 plasmid DΝA was digested to completion widi Smal and Hindlll. A 2.1 kb fragment containing Drulpro/SAM-Kozak/Νos terminator was recovered from 1% "SΕA- PLAQUΕ" agarose using β-agarase. pAG-4000 was obtained from pPZP-200 (Hajdukiewicz, et al, 1994) by inserting a CMVV/nptII/G7 terminator gene cassette into the multiple cloning site of pPZP-200. The CMVV (Cassava mottle vein virus) promoter was obtained from Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). pAG-4000 was digested with Smal and Hindlll and ligated to the 2. lkb pAG-119 fragment to form vector pAG-4032. The details of this construction are described schematically in Figure 9.
The complete nucleotide sequence of the drul promoter: SAMase chimeric gene is presented as SΕQ ID NO: 16. The predicted amino acid coding sequence is presented as SΕQ ID NO: 17. B. CONSTRUCTION OF A DRUIPRO.PGIP BINARY VECTOR.
The PGIP gene (Toubart, et al, 1992) and its 3' untranslated region (UTR) was PCR amplified from pAD-16 (Toubart, et al, 1992) using the primers PGIPNco5' (SEQ ID NO: 18) and PGIPPst3* (SEQ ID NO: 19). The amplification reaction produced a product of 1.8 kb. This 1.8 kb fragment included a portion of the cloning vector. The fragment was digested with Ncol and Pstl to completion resulting in a 1290 bp fragment which no longer contained portions of the cloning vector. pAG-119 (see above) was prepared by digestion to completion with Ncol and Pstl. This removed the SamK portion ofthe plasmid. The remaining portion ofthe plasmid was then ligated to the PGIP-containing fragment described above. This new plasmid was designated pAG-129. pAG-129 was digested to completion widi Xbal and PvuII (a restriction enzyme whose cleavage results in blunt ends). The 2.87 kb fragment containing Drulpro/PGIP/Νos terminator was recovered from 1% "SEAPLAQUE" agarose by using β-agarase. The vector pAG-4033 was prepared by digestion to completion with Xbal and Smal (a restriction enzyme whose cleavage results in blunt ends). This digestion removed the Drulpro/SAM-Kozak/Νos terminator portion of the plasmid. The remaining portion of the plasmid was then ligated to the Drulpro/PGIP/Nos terminator fragment described above. This new plasmid was named pAG-4033 and its construction is described schematically in Figure 10.
The complete nucleotide sequence of the drul promoter:PGIP chimeric gene is presented as SEQ ID NO:20. The predicted amino acid coding sequence is presented as SEQ ID NO:21.
EXAMPLE 8 Southern Blot Analysis of drul Homologues in Several Species of Plants A Southern blot analysis is conducted to determine if sequences homologous to the raspberry drul gene are present in other plant species. The blot consists oi Hindlll digests of six genomic plant DNAs, for example, tomato, raspberry, strawberry, plum, cherry and peach, along with size standards. Probes can be constructed using drul coding sequence-specific primers and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Mullis, 1987; Mullis, et al., 1987). Alternatively, the 700 base pair insert from pAG-301 (SEQ ID NO: 10) is isolated by digestion with EcoRI followed by size fractionation. The DNA fragment is then radioactively-labeled using die Bohringer Mannheim Biochemical (Indi- anapolis, IN) "RANDOM PRIMED DNA LABELING" kit. The blot is hybridized with the drul- specific probe following standard methods (Maniatis, et al, 1982). Exemplary hybridization conditions are as follows: die blot is hybridized overnight at 45 °C with the drul probe in "HY- BRISOL I" hybridization cocktail (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). The final (most stringent) wash is 0.1% SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes at room temperature (22 °C). An autoradiograph of the blot is used to identify plant species to whose genomic DNA the drul probe can hybridize.
EXAMPLE 9 Isolation of DNA Fragments Homologous to drul from a Strawberry Genomic Library
A. Screening of the Library. A custom strawberry genomic library in lambda GEM-11 is obtained from Novagen
(Madison, WI) and screened by standard methods with the drul gene probe described above. Lambda clones which hybridized to the probe are identified. The clones are purified by 3 rounds of plaque purification. Hybridization-positive clones are selected for further analysis.
B. Analysis of a Positive Clone. A clone of interest is digested with several enzymes (e.g. , Apa I, Bam HI, Eco RI, Hind III,
Neo I, Sac I, and Sal I), run on a gel, and transferred to a "SUREBLOT" nylon membrane (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). The blot is hybridized overnight at 45°C with the drul probe in "HYBRISOL I" hybridization cocktail (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD). The final (most stringent) wash is 0.1% SSC, 0.1% SDS for 30 minutes at room temperature (22°C). A hybridization-positive fragment is subcloned into pGEM5Zf(+) (Promega, Madison, WI) and further characterized. The nucleic acid sequence of the insert is determined and the amino acid sequence predicted from the nucleic acid sequence. These sequences are then compared to the raspberry drul nucleic acid and protein sequences. Additional strawberry drul gene sequences are obtained by further hybridization screening of strawberry genomic library clones.
While the invention has been described with reference to specific methods and embodiments, it will be appreciated that various modifications and changes may be made without departing from the invention.
SEQUENCE LISTING (1) GENERAL INFORMATION:
(i) APPLICANT: Agritope, Inc.
(ii) TITLE OF INVENTION: PLANT TISSUE-SPECIFIC PROMOTERS FOR REGULATED EXPRESSION OF TRANSGENES IN PLANTS
(iii) NUMBER OF SEQUENCES: 22
(iv) CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
(A) ADDRESSEE: Dehlinger & Associates
(B) STREET: 350 Cambridge Avenue, Suite 250
(C) CITY: Palo Alto (D) STATE: CA
(E) COUNTRY: USA
(F) ZIP: 94306
(v) COMPUTER READABLE FORM: (A) MEDIUM TYPE: Floppy disk
(B) COMPUTER: IBM PC compatible
(C) OPERATING SYSTEM: PC-DOS/MS-DOS
(D) SOFTWARE: Patentin Release #1.0, Version #1.25
(vi) CURRENT APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER:
(B) FILING DATE:
(C) CLASSIFICATION:
(vii) PRIOR APPLICATION DATA:
(A) APPLICATION NUMBER: US 08/592,936
(B) FILING DATE: 29-JAN-1996
(viii) ATTORNEY/AGENT INFORMATION: (A) NAME: Evans, Susan T.
(B) REGISTRATION NUMBER: 38,443
(C) REFERENCE/DOCKET NUMBER: 4257-0012.41
(ix) TELECOMMUNICATION INFORMATION: (A) TELEPHONE: (415) 324-0880
(B) TELEFAX: (415) 324-0960
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID Nθ:l: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 30 amino acids
(B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: amino terminal drupel sequence ,
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:l:
Val Leu Gin Gly Lys Val Glu Ala Asp lie Glu lie Ser Ala Pro Ala 1 5 10 15
Ala Lys Phe Tyr Asn Leu Phe Lys Ser Glu Ala Xaa Trp Val 20 25 30
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:2:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 30 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: dTRANDOM primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:2:
TAGGCTCGTA GACTCTTTTT TTTTTTTTTT 30
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:3: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 7 amino acids
(B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: peptide
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(v) FRAGMENT TYPE: internal
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: drul partial amino acid sequence
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:3i
Gin Gly Lys Val Glu Ala Asp 1 5
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:4:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 20 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) .ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: reverse translated sequence of SEQ ID NO:3
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:4:
CARGGNAARG TNGARCGNGA 20
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:5: (i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 18 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DrupeRANlβ primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:5:
TAGGCTCGTA GACTCTTT 18
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:6:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 18 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruGen 5' primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:6:
AAGGTGGAGG CTGACATT 18
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:7:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS! (A) LENGTH: 22 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruGen 3' primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:7:
CTGACGGTAT TAGTGCATAA CA 22
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:8:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: - (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruInvUp primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:8:
TGAATGGGTT GGAAGGAGAT GTGT 24
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:9:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 24 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruInvLow primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:9:
ATGGTGCCAG TTTGAGAAGT TTTG 24
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:10:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 751 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: pAG301 insert, drul cDNA clone
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:10:
CAGGGAAAGG TGGAGGCTGA CATTGAAATC TCAGCACCTG CTGACAAGTT CTACAACCTC 60
TTCAAGAGTG AGGCTCACCA CGTCCCCAAA ACTTCTCAAA CTGGCACCAT AACCGGAGTT 120
GCGGTGCATG AAGGAGACTG GGAAACTGAT GGCTCCATTA AGATTTGGAA TTATGCAATA 180
GAGGGCGAAG TGGGAACATT CAAGGAGAAA GTAGAGCTAG ACGATGTGAA CAAGGCAATA 240 ATTCTGAATG GGTTGGAAGG AGATGTGTTC CAGTATTACA AGAGCTTCAA GCCCGTCTAT 300
CAATTCACTC AAAAGAATGA TGGCAGCAGC ATTGCCAAAG TGTCCATTGA ATATGAGAAA 360
CTGAGTGAGG AAGTTGCAGA TCCAAATAAG TACATTCGCT TGATGACTAA TATCGTCAAG 420
GATCTTGATG CCCACTTCAT CAAGGCATAA AAGGGATATT ATAATAAATC AAGCATATGA 480
AACACGATGA AAAGAGAGCT AGCCACTATC TACTGCTGGT TTATAAGTTT AAAGATAATC 540
ATGTGAACGT TGTAATGCAT GCTTTGTTTG GTTACTTCGT TTTAATGTCT TGTTATGCAC 600
TAATACCGTC AGTGTAATAA AAGCTAGTGT GAAAGGATCT GATATATTGT GATGTATCAT 660
GTATTCAACT ACCAACTATA TATGGTATCA TATTTATATA TCAAATAAAT TAATGTGAAA 720
AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAGAG TCTACGAGCC T 751
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:11:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 745 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: double (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: pAG302, drul genomic clone
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:11:
AAGGTGGAGG CTGACATTGA AATCTCAGCA CCTGCTGACA AGTTCTACAA CCTCTTCAAG 60
AGTGAGGCTC ACCACGTCCC CAAAACTTCT CAAACTGGCA CCATAACCGG AGTTGCGGTG 120
CATGAAGGAG ACTGGGAAAC TGATGGCTCC ATTAAGATTT GGAATTATGC AATAGGTAAG 180
CCATTATGTT GTTAGATTGT TAATTTAGAT TATTAACCAA AGCTGGCTTT GAATCACTAC 240 AATATATATT AGGGCACGCC AGTACAGATT TTCTGTTTAT AATTGTTTCA GTGATTATTT 300
TCTTACAAAT ATAGAGGGCG AAGTGGGAAC ATTCAAGGAG AAAGTAGAGC TAGACGATGT 360
GAACAAGGCA ATAATTCTGA ATGGGTTGGA AGGAGATGTG TTCCAGTATT ACAAGAGCTT 420
CAAGCCCGTC TATCAATTCA CTCAAAAGAA TGATGGCAGC AGCATTGCCA AAGTGTCCAT 480
TGAATATGAG AAACTGAGTG AGGAAGTTGC AGATCCAAAT AAGTACATTC GCTTGATGAC 540
TAATATCGTC AAGGATCTTG ATGCCCACTT CATCAAGGCA TAAAAGGGAT ATTATAATAA 600
ATCAAGCATA TGAAACACGA TGAAAAGAGA GCTAGCCACT ATCTACTGCT GGTTTATAAG 660
TTTAAAGATA ATCATGTGAA CGTTGTAATG CATGCTTTGT TTGGTTACTT CGTTTTAATG 720
TCTTGTTATG CACTAATACC GTCAG 745
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:12:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 2213 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: both
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) AN I-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: pAG310 insert sequence
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:12:
ATGCATATCA ACAACTACGA ATAAAGAGAT CAGCCTTTCC GTATCTGGTG GATGTTTGAG 60
TCGGTGATGA CCATCTAATT AAAGAAAGAA GAAAAATTAT ACATATTGTG GACCTCCCCA 120
TATATAATTC TTATCATCTT TGTTACTGCC ATTATGATTA TAAAATGATA TTAAAGGGAT 180
GGTGTACCGT GTACTAATCA AATATCTACC TGATCTTATT GATTTGAAAG ATCATAAAAA 240 GAAATTAAAA TTGTTCAAAA TAAACCCCTA GAATTATATA TAGTTCATTA AGTTCAAATT 300
AATTCGTTTG AAACGTGTTA AGCAACCCTA CAACGTACTA AGCACCCTAG CTCCCTTTGC 360
CTCTCGGCGG TAAGAGGAGA TATCCTCAGT CGAATTATGA GCCGATCGAG GAAAGCTCGA 420
TCAGTTGGAA AATCTTTCTT TCTTATGGCC AAGTTGTTTC AAACAATATA TTGAATTATT 480
GACTCTTAGC AACTTAAGTT TCAAACCGTG ACGAACCAAT AAAATTTGAC AAATTAATCA 540
CTTTAAGTGC CTAGTGGATC AGCGTCTAGG TTGGGAACCC CTCTACCTGC GTTTGATTCA 600
CCAAGCTATC AAAATGGTCA GACACTGTGC TGCAATGCAC AATTGGAGCA TTTCACATGC 660
GTTGCATGAA TTATTCCTTG GGTTAGGAAA CCTTTGAAAT ACCTTGACTA AGGTAAAAAA 720
AAAAACTTGA CAAATTAATA AATATTAATA TTGATTTTGT ACGTACACGA CTTAACCAAA 780
CTCTCAATGA TTTATTGATT TCTAATATAT ATATTAATAA CGTACGTCTA ATTGGATCAT 840
TCATGATCTA CAGCCATCAC ATCTCAGATG ATTTTCTTGC AATGAATTGC CTAAGCTGGC 900
GTTATTATCT TTTTTTCATA ATACAGTTTT AAAAAAGGGT ACGTATTGGA GCTGGTGATG 960
ACTTCTTAAG AAACAACAAA TTAACGCCAT AGCTATTTGA TTTATATATC CAAAAGGAGA 1020
AAATGTATAA GATCGTTGCT TACTTAATTT GCAGGCTAGG TTAATTGACA TCAAATAATT 1080
GAAGAGTACG TAGGGCCAAT GTTGCTGAGA TCTAGCATCA ATAATAGGAT TTGGCTTGTC 1140
GATCGATCAT CTTTATTTAA TTGAGAGGTA TGTATCCATA TGTTTTCTGA AATTAAAATA 1200
TTACCTAATA ATTGAGCTGA AACTGTAGTG AATTTAACCT TTTCTAAGTT CTGCCCATAT 1260
ATAACATACC ACATAGGTAG CTGATCGATC GATCATATAT ATGTACTTAG GGTTCTGATC 1320
AGTATCAATA TCGATCACAA GTGCTGATAA TTAAACATGG TTCTTCAAGG TAAGGTGGAG 1380
GCTGACATTG AAATCTCAGC ACCTGCTGAC AAGTTCTACA ACCTCTTCAA GAGTGAGGCT 1440
CACCACGTCC CCAAAACTTC TCAAACTGGC ACCATAACCG GAGTTGCGGT GCATGAAGGA 1500
GACTGGGAAA CTGATGGCTC CATTAAGATT TGGAATTATG CAATAGGTAA GCCATTATGT 1560
TGTTAGATTG TTAATTTAGA TTATTAACCA AAGCTGGCTT TGAATCACTA CAATATATAT 1620 TAGGGCACGC CAGTACAGAT TTTCTGTTTA TAATTGTTTC AGTGATTATT TTCTTACAAA 1680
TATAGAGGGC GAAGTGGGAA CATTCAAGGA GAAAGTAGAG CTAGACGATG TGAACAAGGC 1740
AATAATTCTG AATGGGTTGG AAGGAGATGT GTTCCAGTAT TACAAGAGCT TCAAGCCCGT 1800
CTATCAATTC ACTCAAAAGA ATGATGGCAG CAGCATTGCC AAAGTGTCCA TTGAATATGA 1860
GAAACTGAGT GAGGAAGTTG CAGATCCAAA TAAGTACATT CGCTTGATGA CTAATATCGT 1920
CAAGGATCTT GATGCCCACT TCATCAAGGC ATAAAAGGGA TATTATAATA AATCAAGCAT 1980
ATGAAACACG ATGAAAAGAG AGCTAGCCAC TATCTACTGC TGGTTTATAA GTTTAAAGAT 2040
AATCATGTGA ACGTTGTAAT GCATGCTTTG TTTGGTTACT TCGTTTTAAT GTCTTGTTAT 2100
GCACTAATAC CGTCAGTGTA ATAAAAGCTA GTGTGAAAGG ATCTGATATA TTGTGATGTA 2160
TCATGTATTC AACTACCAAC TATATATGGT ATCATATTTA TATATCAAAT AAA 2213
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:13:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 152 amino acids (B) TYPE: amino acid
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: - (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: predicted amino acid coding sequence of drul
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:13:
Met Val Leu Gin Gly Lys Val Glu Ala Asp lie Glu lie Ser Ala Pro 1 5 10 15
Ala Asp Lys Phe Tyr Asn Leu Phe Lys Ser Glu Ala His His Val Pro 20 25 30 Lys Thr Ser Gin Thr Gly Thr lie Thr Gly Val Ala Val His Glu Gly 35 40 45
Asp Trp Glu Thr Asp Gly Ser lie Lys lie Trp Aβn Tyr Ala lie Glu 50 55 60
Gly Glu Val Gly Thr Phe Lys Glu Lys Val Glu Leu Asp Asp Val Asn 65 70 75 80
Lys Ala lie lie Leu Asn Gly Leu Glu Gly Asp Val Phe Gin Tyr Tyr
85 90 95
Lys Ser Phe Lys Pro Val Tyr Gin Phe Thr Gin Lys Asn Asp Gly Ser 100 105 110
Ser lie Ala Lys Val Ser lie Glu Tyr Glu Lys Leu Ser Glu Glu Val 115 120 125
Ala Asp Pro Asn Lys Tyr lie Arg Leu Met Thr Asn lie Val Lys Asp 130 135 140
Leu Asp Ala His Phe lie Lys Ala 145 150
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:14:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 29 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iϋ) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruPro5'RI primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:14:
GAGAATTCCC CGGGCAGATC AACAACTAC 29 (2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:15:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 23 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: DruPro3' primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:15:
GCGCGGCCAT GGTTAATTAT CAG 23
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:16:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 2145 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: both
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: drul promoter:SAMase chimeric gene
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:16:
CCCGGGCAGA TCAACAACTA CGAATAAAGA GATCAGCCTT TCCGTATCTG GTGGATGTTT 60
GAGTCGGTGA TGACCATCTA ATTAAAGAAA GAAGAAAAAT TATACATATT GTGGACCTCC 120 CCATATATAA TTCTTATCAT CTTTGTTACT GCCATTATGA TTATAAAATG ATATTAAAGG 180
GATGGTGTAC CGTGTACTAA TCAAATATCT ACCTGATCTT ATTGATTTGA AAGATCATAA 240
AAAGAAATTA AAATTGTTCA AAATAAACCC CTAGAATTAT ATATAGTTCA TTAAGTTCAA 300
ATTAATTCGT TTGAAACGTG TTAAGCAACC CTACAACGTA CTAAGCACCC TAGCTCCCTT 360
TGCCTCTCGG CGGTAAGAGG AGATATCCTC AGTCGAATTA TGAGCCGATC GAGGAAAGCT 420
CGATCAGTTG GAAAATCTTT CTTTCTTATG GCCAAGTTGT TTCAAACAAT ATATTGAATT 480
ATTGACTCTT AGCAACTTAA GTTTCAAACC GTGACGAACC AATAAAATTT GACAAATTAA 540
TCACTTTAAG TGCCTAGTGG ATCAGCGTCT AGGTTGGGAA CCCCTCTACC TGCGTTTGAT 600
TCACCAAGCT ATCAAAATGG TCAGACACTG TGCTGCAATG CACAATTGGA GCATTTCACA 660
TGCGTTGCAT GAATTATTCC TTGGGTTAGG AAACCTTTGA AATACCTTGA CTAAGGTAAA 720
AAAAAAAACT TGACAAATTA ATAAATATTA ATATTGATTT TGTACGTACA CGACTTAACC 780
AAACTCTCAA TGATTTATTG ATTTCTAATA TATATATTAA TAACGTACGT CTAATTGGAT 840
CATTCATGAT CTACAGCCAT CACATCTCAG ATGATTTTCT TGCAATGAAT TGCCTAAGCT 900
GGCGTTATTA TCTTTTTTTC ATAATACAGT TTTAAAAAAG GGTACGTATT GGAGCTGGTG 960
ATGACTTCTT AAGAAACAAC AAATTAACGC CATAGCTATT TGATTTATAT ATCCAAAAGG 1020
AGAAAATGTA TAAGATCGTT GCTTACTTAA TTTGCAGGCT AGGTTAATTG ACATCAAATA 1080
ATTGAAGAGT ACGTAGGGCC AATGTTGCTG AGATCTAGCA TCAATAATAG GATTTGGCTT 1140
GTCGATCGAT CATCTTTATT TAATTGAGAG GTATGTATCC ATATGTTTTC TGAAATTAAA 1200
ATATTACCTA ATAATTGAGC TGAAACTGTA GTGAATTTAA CCTTTTCTAA GTTCTGCCCA 1260
TATATAACAT ACCACATAGG TAGCTGATCG ATCGATCATA TATATGTACT TAGGGTTCTG 1320
ATCAGTATCA ATATCGATCA CAAGTGCTGA TAATTAACCA TGGTTTTCAC TAAAGAGCCT 1380
GCGAACGTCT TCTATGTACT GGTTTCCGCT TTCCGTTCTA ACCTCTGCGA TGAGGTGAAT 1440
ATGAGCAGAC ACCGCCACAT GGTAAGCACT TTACGTGCCG CACCGGGTCT TTATGGCTCC 1500 GTTGAGTCAA CCGATTTGAC CGGGTGCTAT CGTGAGGCAA TCTCAAGCGC ACCAACTGAG 1560
GAAAAAACTG TTCGTGTACG CTACAAGGAC AAAGCGCAGC CACTCAATGT TGCACGCCTA 1620
GCTTCTAATG AGTGGGAGCA AGATTGCGTA CTGGTATACA AATCACAGAC TCACACGGCT 1680
GGTCTGGTGT ACGCTAAAGG TATCGACGGG TATAAGGCTG AACGTCTGCC GGGTAGTTTC 1740
CAAGAGGTTC CTAAAGGCGC ACCGCTGCAA GGCTGCTTCA CTATTGATGA GTTCGGTCGC 1800
CGCTGGCAAG TACAATAAGT GTTAAACTCA AGGTCATGCA CGATGCGTGG CGGATCGGGT 1860
ACCGAGCTCG AATTTCGACC TGCAGATCGT TCAAACATTT GGCAATAAAG TTTCTTAAGA 1920
TTGAATCCTG TTGCCGGTCT TGCGATGATT ATCATATAAT TTCTGTTGAA TTACGTTAAG 1980
CATGTAATAA TTAACATGTA ATGCATGACG TTATTTATGA GATGGGTTTT TATGATTAGA 2040
GTCCCGCAAT TATACATTTA ATACGCGATA GAAAACAAAA TATAGCGCGC AAACTAGGAT 2100
AAATTATCGC GCGCGGTGTC ATCTATGTTA CTAGATCTTC TAGAA 2145
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:17:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 152 amino acids
(B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: predicted amino acid coding sequence of SEQ ID NO:16
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:17:
Met Val Phe Thr Lys Glu Pro Ala Asn Val Phe Tyr Val Leu Val Ser 1 5 10 15
Ala Phe Arg Ser Asn Leu Cys Asp Glu Val Asn Met Ser Arg His Arg 20 25 30 His Met Val Ser Thr Leu Arg Ala Ala Pro Gly Leu Tyr Gly Ser Val 35 40 45
Glu Ser Thr Asp Leu Thr Gly Cys Tyr Arg Glu Ala lie Ser Ser Ala 50 55 60
Pro Thr Glu Glu Lys Thr Val Arg Val Arg Tyr Lys Asp Lys Ala Gin 65 70 75 80
Pro Leu Asn Val Ala Arg Leu Ala Ser Asn Glu Trp Glu Gin Asp Cys
85 90 95
Val Leu Val Tyr Lys Ser Gin Thr His Thr Ala Gly Leu Val Tyr Ala 100 105 110
Lys Gly lie Asp Gly Tyr Lys Ala Glu Arg Leu Pro Gly Ser Phe Gin 115 120 125
Glu Val Pro Lys Gly Ala Pro Leu Gin Gly Cys Phe Thr lie Asp Glu 130 135 140
Phe Gly Arg Arg Trp Gin Val Gin 145 150
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:18:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 18 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid (C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(ϋi) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: PGIP Nco5' Primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:18:
GGGGCTCCAT GGCTCATT 18 ( 2 ) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO: 19 :
( i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS :
(A) LENGTH: 21 base pairs ( B ) TYPE : nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: single
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: PGIP Pst3' Primer
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:19:
GGGCGAAAAA CCGTCTATCA G 21
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:20:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 2917 base pairs
(B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: both
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: sequence of the drul:PGIP chimeric gene
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:20:
GAATTCCCCG GGCAGATCAA CAACTACGAA TAAAGAGATC AGCCTTTCCG TATCTGGTGG 60
ATGTTTGAGT CGGTGATGAC CATCTAATTA AAGAAAGAAG AAAAATTATA CATATTGTGG 120 ACCTCCCCAT ATATAATTCT TATCATCTTT GTTACTGCCA TTATGATTAT AAAATGATAT 180
TAAAGGGATG GTGTACCGTG TACTAATCAA ATATCTACCT GATCTTATTG ATTTGAAAGA 240
TCATAAAAAG AAATTAAAAT TGTTCAAAAT AAACCCCTAG AATTATATAT AGTTCATTAA 300
GTTCAAATTA ATTCGTTTGA AACGTGTTAA GCAACCCTAC AACGTACTAA GCACCCTAGC 360
TCCCTTTGCC TCTCGGCGGT AAGAGGAGAT ATCCTCAGTC GAATTATGAG CCGATCGAGG 420
AAAGCTCGAT CAGTTGGAAA ATCTTTCTTT CTTATGGCCA AGTTGTTTCA AACAATATAT 480
TGAATTATTG ACTCTTAGCA ACTTAAGTTT CAAACCGTGA CGAACCAATA AAATTTGACA 540
AATTAATCAC TTTAAGTGCC TAGTGGATCA GCGTCTAGGT TGGGAACCCC TCTACCTGCG 600
TTTGATTCAC CAAGCTATCA AAATGGTCAG ACACTGTGCT GCAATGCACA ATTGGAGCAT 660
TTCACATGCG TTGCATGAAT TATTCCTTGG GTTAGGAAAC CTTTGAAATA CCTTGACTAA 720
GGTAAAAAAA AAAACTTGAC AAATTAATAA ATATTAATAT TGATTTTGTA CGTACACGAC 780
TTAACCAAAC TCTCAATGAT TTATTGATTT CTAATATATA TATTAATAAC GTACGTCTAA 840
TTGGATCATT CATGATCTAC AGCCATCACA TCTCAGATGA TTTTCTTGCA ATGAATTGCC 900
TAAGCTGGCG TTATTATCTT TTTTTCATAA TACAGTTTTA AAAAAGGGTA CGTATTGGAG 960
CTGGTGATGA CTTCTTAAGA AACAACAAAT TAACGCCATA GCTATTTGAT TTATATATCC 1020
AAAAGGAGAA AATGTATAAG ATCGTTGCTT ACTTAATTTG CAGGCTAGGT TAATTGACAT 1080
CAAATAATTG AAGAGTACGT AGGGCCAATG TTGCTGAGAT CTAGCATCAA TAATAGGATT 1140
TGGCTTGTCG ATCGATCATC TTTATTTAAT TGAGAGGTAT GTATCCATAT GTTTTCTGAA 1200
ATTAAAATAT TACCTAATAA TTGAGCTGAA ACTGTAGTGA ATTTAACCTT TTCTAAGTTC 1260
TGCCCATATA TAACATACCA CATAGGTAGC TGATCGATCG ATCATATATA TGTACTTAGG 1320
GTTCTGATCA GTATCAATAT CGATCACAAG TGCTGATAAT TAACCATGGC TCAATTCAAT 1380
ATCCCAGTAA CCATGTCTTC AAGCTTAAGC ATAATTTTGG TCATTCTTGT ATCTTTGAGA 1440
ACTGCACTCT CAGAGCTATG CAACCCACAA GATAAGCAAG CCCTTCTCCA AATCAAGAAA 1500 GACCTTGGCA ACCCAACCAC TCTCTCTTCA TGGCTTCCAA CCACCGACTG TTGTAACAGA 1560
ACCTGGCTAG GTGTTTTATG CGACACCGAC ACCCAAACAT ATCGCGTCAA CAACCTCGAC 1620
CTCTCCGGCC ATAACCTCCC AAAACCCTAC CCTATCCCTT CCTCCCTCGC CAACCTCCCC 1680
TACCTCAATT TTCTATACAT TGGCGGCATC AATAACCTCG TCGGTCCAAT CCCCCCCGCC 1740
ATCGCTAAAC TCACCCAACT CCACTATCTC TATATCACTC ACACCAATGT CTCCGGCGCA 1800
ATACCCGATT TCTTGTCACA GATCAAAACC CTCGTCACCC TCGACTTCTC CTACAACGCC 1860
CTCTCCGGCA CCCTCCCTCC CTCCATCTCT TCTCTCCCCA ACCTCGGAGG AATCACATTC 1920
GACGGCAACC GAATCTCCGG CGCCATCCCC GACTCCTACG GCTCGTTTTC GAAGCTGTTT 1980
ACGGCGATGA CCATCTCCCG CAACCGCCTC ACCGGGAAGA TTCCACCGAC GTTTGCGAAT 2040
CTGAACCTGG CGTTCGTTGA CTTGTCTCGG AACATGCTGG AGGGTGACGC GTCGGTGTTG 2100
TTCGGGTCAG ATAAGAACAC GAAGAAGATA CATCTGGCGA AGAACTCTCT TGCTTTTGAT 2160
TTGGGGAAAG TGGGGTTGTC AAAGAACTTG AACGGGTTGG ATCTGAGGAA CAACCGTATC 2220
TATGGGACGC TACCTCAGGG ACTAACGCAG CTAAAGTTTC TGCAAAGTTT AAATGTGAGC 2280
TTCAACAATC TGTGCGGTGA GATTCCTCAA GGTGGGAACT TGAAAAGGTT TGACGTTTCT 2340
TCTTATGCCA ACAACAAGTG CTTGTGTGGT TCTCCTCTTC CTTCCTGCAC TTAACCATTT 2400
CCAGATTCGG TAATTATGGA TGCATCATGT TTGCCTTTCT ATGAACATCA ATAATGATAC 2460
AAGTGTAAAA ATAAAAATAA ATTTATGATA TATAATAAAC GTCTTGTATC ATTATTTTTA 2520
TCCTAAAGTG AATTATAATA TTTGCTGATA AAAAAAAGCT CTCTCTCATA GGTAAGTATA 2580
TTTTTTAATA CATTTGACTG AAATAACATA TTCTCTGTAT GTACGTCGTA CTTAGGATCC 2640
CCCGGGCTGC AGATCGTTCA AACATTTGGC AATAAAGTTT CTTAAGATTG AATCCTGTTG 2700
CCGGTCTTGC GATGATTATC ATATAATTTC TGTTGAATTA CGTTAAGCAT GTAATAATTA 2760
ACATGTAATG CATGACGTTA TTTATGAGAT GGGTTTTTAT GATTAGAGTC CCGCAATTAT 2820
ACATTTAATA CGCGATAGAA AACAAAATAT AGCGCGCAAA CTAGGATAAA TTATCGCGCG 2880 CGGTGTCATC TATGTTACTA GATCTTCTAG AAAGCTT 2917
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:21:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS:
(A) LENGTH: 342 amino acids
(B) TYPE: amino acid (D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: protein
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE: (C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: predicted amino acid coding sequence
Of SEQ ID NO:20
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:21:
Met Ala Gin Phe Asn lie Pro Val Thr Met Ser Ser Ser Leu Ser lie 1 5 10 15
lie Leu Val He Leu Val Ser Leu Arg Thr Ala Leu Ser Glu Leu Cys 20 25 30
Asn Pro Gin Asp Lys Gin Ala Leu Leu Gin He Lys Lys Asp Leu Gly 35 40 45
Asn Pro Thr Thr Leu Ser Ser Trp Leu Pro Thr Thr Asp Cys Cys Asn 50 55 60
Arg Thr Trp Leu Gly Val Leu Cys Asp Thr Asp Thr Gin Thr Tyr Arg 65 70 75 80
Val Asn Asn Leu Asp Leu Ser Gly His Asn Leu Pro Lys Pro Tyr Pro 85 90 95
He Pro Ser Ser Leu Ala Asn Leu Pro Tyr Leu Asn Phe Leu Tyr He 100 105 110
Gly Gly He Asn Asn Leu Val Gly Pro He Pro Pro Ala He Ala Lys
115 120 125
Leu Thr Gin Leu His Tyr Leu Tyr He Thr His Thr Asn Val Ser Gly 130 135 140
Ala He Pro Asp Phe Leu Ser Gin He Lys Thr Leu Val Thr Leu Asp 145 150 155 160
Phe Ser Tyr Asn Ala Leu Ser Gly Thr Leu Pro Pro Ser He Ser Ser 165 170 175
Leu Pro Asn Leu Gly Gly He Thr Phe Asp Gly Asn Arg He Ser Gly 180 185 190
Ala He Pro Asp Ser Tyr Gly Ser Phe Ser Lys Leu Phe Thr Ala Met 195 200 205
Thr He Ser Arg Asn Arg Leu Thr Gly Lys He Pro Pro Thr Phe Ala
210 215 220
Asn Leu Asn Leu Ala Phe Val Asp Leu Ser Arg Asn Met Leu Glu Gly 225 230 235 240
Asp Ala Ser Val Leu Phe Gly Ser Asp Lys Asn Thr Lys Lys He His 245 250 255
Leu Ala Lys Asn Ser Leu Ala Phe Asp Leu Gly Lys Val Gly Leu Ser 260 265 270
Lys Asn Leu Asn Gly Leu Asp Leu Arg Asn Asn Arg He Tyr Gly Thr 275 280 285
Leu Pro Gin Gly Leu Thr Gin Leu Lys Phe Leu Gin Ser Leu Asn Val 290 295 300
Ser Phe Asn Asn Leu Cys Gly Glu He Pro Gin Gly Gly Asn Leu Lys 305 310 315 320
Arg Phe Asp Val Ser Ser Tyr Ala Asn Asn Lys Cys Leu Cys Gly Ser 325 330 335
Pro Leu Pro Ser Cys Thr 340
(2) INFORMATION FOR SEQ ID NO:22:
(i) SEQUENCE CHARACTERISTICS: (A) LENGTH: 1356 base pairs (B) TYPE: nucleic acid
(C) STRANDEDNESS: double
(D) TOPOLOGY: linear
(ii) MOLECULE TYPE: DNA
(iii) HYPOTHETICAL: NO
(iv) ANTI-SENSE: NO
(vi) ORIGINAL SOURCE:
(C) INDIVIDUAL ISOLATE: Exemplary drul promoter sequence
(xi) SEQUENCE DESCRIPTION: SEQ ID NO:22:
ATGCATATCA ACAACTACGA ATAAAGAGAT CAGCCTTTCC GTATCTGGTG GATGTTTGAG 60
TCGGTGATGA CCATCTAATT AAAGAAAGAA GAAAAATTAT ACATATTGTG GACCTCCCCA 120
TATATAATTC TTATCATCTT TGTTACTGCC ATTATGATTA TAAAATGATA TTAAAGGGAT 180
GGTGTACCGT GTACTAATCA AATATCTACC TGATCTTATT GATTTGAAAG ATCATAAAAA 240
GAAATTAAAA TTGTTCAAAA TAAACCCCTA GAATTATATA TAGTTCATTA AGTTCAAATT 300
AATTCGTTTG AAACGTGTTA AGCAACCCTA CAACGTACTA AGCACCCTAG CTCCCTTTGC 360
CTCTCGGCGG TAAGAGGAGA TATCCTCAGT CGAATTATGA GCCGATCGAG GAAAGCTCGA 420
TCAGTTGGAA AATCTTTCTT TCTTATGGCC AAGTTGTTTC AAACAATATA TTGAATTATT 480
GACTCTTAGC AACTTAAGTT TCAAACCGTG ACGAACCAAT AAAATTTGAC AAATTAATCA 540
CTTTAAGTGC CTAGTGGATC AGCGTCTAGG TTGGGAACCC CTCTACCTGC GTTTGATTCA 600
CCAAGCTATC AAAATGGTCA GACACTGTGC TGCAATGCAC AATTGGAGCA TTTCACATGC 660
GTTGCATGAA TTATTCCTTG GGTTAGGAAA CCTTTGAAAT ACCTTGACTA AGGTAAAAAA 720
AAAAACTTGA CAAATTAATA AATATTAATA TTGATTTTGT ACGTACACGA CTTAACCAAA 780
CTCTCAATGA TTTATTGATT TCTAATATAT ATATTAATAA CGTACGTCTA ATTGGATCAT 840
TCATGATCTA CAGCCATCAC ATCTCAGATG ATTTTCTTGC AATGAATTGC CTAAGCTGGC 900 GTTATTATCT TTTTTTCATA ATACAGTTTT AAAAAAGGGT ACGTATTGGA GCTGGTGATG 960
ACTTCTTAAG AAACAACAAA TTAACGCCAT AGCTATTTGA TTTATATATC CAAAAGGAGA 1020
AAATGTATAA GATCGTTGCT TACTTAATTT GCAGGCTAGG TTAATTGACA TCAAATAATT 1080
GAAGAGTACG TAGGGCCAAT GTTGCTGAGA TCTAGCATCA ATAATAGGAT TTGGCTTGTC 1140
GATCGATCAT CTTTATTTAA TTGAGAGGTA TGTATCCATA TGTTTTCTGA AATTAAAATA 1200
TTACCTAATA ATTGAGCTGA AACTGTAGTG AATTTAACCT TTTCTAAGTT CTGCCCATAT 1260
ATAACATACC ACATAGGTAG CTGATCGATC GATCATATAT ATGTACTTAG GGTTCTGATC 1320
AGTATCAATA TCGATCACAA GTGCTGATAA TTAAAC 1356

Claims

IT IS CLAIMED:
1. A chimeric gene, comprising
(i) a DNA sequence encoding a product of interest, and (ii) a drul promoter, where said DNA sequence is heterologous to said promoter and said DNA sequence is operably linked to said promoter to enable expression of said product.
2. A chimeric gene of claim 1, wherein said DNA sequence encodes a product selected from the group consisting of S-adenosylmetiπonine hydrolase, aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase, ACC oxidase antisense molecule, ACC synthase antisense molecule, ACC oxidase cosuppression molecule, and ACC synthase cosuppression molecule.
3. A chimeric gene of claim 1, wherein said DNA sequence is a pathogenesis related gene.
4. A chimeric gene of claim 3, wherein said DNA sequence is selected from the group consisting of polygalacturonase inhibiting protein (PGIP), glucanase and chitinase.
5. A chimeric gene of claim 1, wherein said DNA sequence encodes a product selected from the group consisting of thaumatin, sucrose phosphate synthase and lycopene cyclase.
6. A chimeric gene of claim 1, wherein the promoter is obtained from a gene homologous to a raspberry drul gene.
7. A chimeric gene of claim 6, wherein the promoter is from a raspberry drul gene.
8. A chimeric gene of claim 7, wherein the promoter is derived from the sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22.
9. A plant transformation vector containing the chimeric gene of any of claims 1-8.
10. A kit for use in plant transformation, comprising the vector of claim 9.
11. A plant cell containing the chimeric gene of any of claims 1-8.
12. A transgenic fruit-bearing plant, comprising die chimeric gene of any of claims 1-8.
13. A fruit produced by the plant of claim 12.
14. A method for modifying ripening fruit of a fruit bearing plant, comprising, growing the plant of claim 12, to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit, wherein (i) the chimeric gene encodes a product capable of reducing ethylene biosynthesis when expressed in plant cells, and (ii) fruit produced by said plant has a modified ripening phenotype.
15. A metiiod for producing a transgenic fruit-bearing plant, comprising introducing into progenitor cells of the plant a chimeric gene of any of claims 1-8, and growing the transformed progenitor cells to produce a transgenic plant bearing fruit.
16. A method of claim 15, where said introducing includes transforming progenitor cells of the plant with a selectable vector containing said chimeric gene.
17. A metiiod of claim 15, wherein the promoter is isolated by the steps of:
(i) selecting a probe DNA molecule containing a sequence homologous to a region of raspberry drul gene DNA,
(ii) contacting the probe with a plurality of target DNA molecules derived from the genome of a selected fruit-bearing plant under conditions favoring specific hybridization between the probe molecule and a target molecule homologous to the probe molecule,
(iii) identifying a target molecule having a DNA sequence homologous to the raspberry drul gene, and
(iv) isolating promoter sequences associated with the target molecule.
18. A method of isolating a drul promoter, comprising
(i) selecting a probe DNA molecule containing a sequence homologous to a region of raspberry drul gene DNA,
(ii) contacting the probe with a plurality of target DNA molecules derived from the genome of a selected fruit-bearing plant under conditions favoring specific hybridization between the probe molecule and a target molecule homologous to the probe molecule, (iii) identifying a target molecule having a DNA sequence homologous to the raspberry drul gene, and
(iv) isolating promoter sequences associated with the target molecule.
19. A method of claim 18, where said probe DNA molecule has the sequence presented as SEQ ID NO:22.
20. A method of claim 18, where said fruit-bearing plant is selected from the group consisting of grapes, strawberries, blackberries, plums, cherries, peaches, blueberries and cranberries.
21. An isolated DNA molecule comprising a drul promoter.
22. An isolated DNA molecule comprising a promoter from a raspberry drul gene.
PCT/US1997/001443 1996-01-29 1997-01-27 Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants Ceased WO1997027308A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU18466/97A AU712460B2 (en) 1996-01-29 1997-01-27 Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants
JP9527109A JP2000503848A (en) 1996-01-29 1997-01-27 Plant tissue / phase specific promoter for controlled expression of transgene in plants
EP97904071A EP0877813A1 (en) 1996-01-29 1997-01-27 Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/592,936 US5783393A (en) 1996-01-29 1996-01-29 Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants
US08/592,936 1996-01-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1997027308A1 true WO1997027308A1 (en) 1997-07-31

Family

ID=24372662

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1997/001443 Ceased WO1997027308A1 (en) 1996-01-29 1997-01-27 Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (3) US5783393A (en)
EP (1) EP0877813A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2000503848A (en)
KR (2) KR19990082127A (en)
AU (1) AU712460B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2243969A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1997027308A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998031812A1 (en) * 1997-01-21 1998-07-23 Monsanto Company Strawberry promoters and genes
WO1999040211A3 (en) * 1998-02-06 1999-09-30 Calgene Llc Strawberry fruit promoters for gene expression
WO2000012714A1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2000-03-09 The University Of Queensland A novel plant promoter and uses therefor
US7202355B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2007-04-10 Kaneka Corporation DNA sequence regulating plant fruit-specific expression

Families Citing this family (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6723839B1 (en) 1996-10-01 2004-04-20 Colorado State University Through Its Agent Colorado State University Research Foundation Partial gene sequence from pelargonium to control ethylene levels in geraniums
US20050086718A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2005-04-21 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US7897843B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2011-03-01 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcriptional regulation of plant biomass and abiotic stress tolerance
AU782918B2 (en) 1999-11-10 2005-09-08 University Of Washington Compositions and methods for modulation of plant cell division
EP1950306A1 (en) 1999-11-17 2008-07-30 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Environmental stress tolerance genes
MXPA02004878A (en) 1999-11-17 2004-04-05 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Plant biochemistry related genes.
EP1406483A4 (en) 2000-08-22 2005-05-25 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Genes for modifying plant traits iv
EP1349946B1 (en) 2000-08-25 2011-01-26 BASF Plant Science GmbH Plant polynucleotides encoding prenyl proteases
US20060265782A1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2006-11-23 Hinkle Gregory J Novel plant transcribed regions and uses thereof
AU2002239564A1 (en) * 2000-12-11 2002-06-24 Exelixis Plant Sciences, Inc. Senescence-associated plant promotors
US20040101841A1 (en) * 2001-05-09 2004-05-27 Ranu Rajinder S. Plant promoter
WO2002096923A1 (en) * 2001-05-30 2002-12-05 Chromos Molecular Systems, Inc. Plant artificial chromosomes, uses thereof and methods of preparing plant artificial chromosomes
DK1546336T3 (en) 2002-09-18 2012-04-10 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants.
US8962915B2 (en) 2004-06-14 2015-02-24 Evogene Ltd. Isolated polypeptides, polynucleotides encoding same, transgenic plants expressing same and methods of using same
RU2421462C2 (en) 2005-07-29 2011-06-20 Таргитид Гроус, Инк. Protective action of dominant-negative mutant protein krp from inhibiting wild-type active complex cyclin-cdk krp
US7820883B2 (en) 2006-03-15 2010-10-26 Dow Agrosciences Llc Resistance to auxinic herbicides
EP2090658A3 (en) 2006-06-13 2009-11-11 Agrinomics, LLC Generation of plants with improved pathogen resistance
AU2008245611B2 (en) 2007-04-27 2014-09-18 University Of California Plant CO2 sensors, nucleic acids encoding them, and methods for making and using them
UA100692C2 (en) 2007-05-02 2013-01-25 Мериал Лимитед Dna-plasmids having increased expression and stability
CA2989183C (en) 2007-12-05 2021-04-13 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Genes that increase plant oil and method for using the same
JP5527654B2 (en) * 2007-12-05 2014-06-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Genes for increasing production of plant oils and methods of use thereof
JP5299886B2 (en) * 2008-03-04 2013-09-25 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Genes for increasing production of plant oils and methods of use thereof
WO2010060162A1 (en) 2008-11-28 2010-06-03 Empresa Brasileira De Pesquisa Agropecuária - Embrapa Use of at(n) insertions in promoter elements for controlling the expression levels of coding sequences in plants
JP5847991B2 (en) 2009-06-04 2016-01-27 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Gene for improving substance productivity in seed and method for using the same
JP5519192B2 (en) 2009-06-04 2014-06-11 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Gene for increasing protein content of seed and method for using the same
JP5718554B2 (en) 2009-06-04 2015-05-13 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Gene for increasing plant weight of plant and method for using the same
CA2809644C (en) 2010-08-30 2020-06-30 Agrigenetics, Inc. Activation tagging platform for maize, and resultant tagged populations and plants
KR101373104B1 (en) * 2011-11-03 2014-03-12 서강대학교산학협력단 Stress Inducible Transgenic plants
UA119636C2 (en) 2012-06-22 2019-07-25 Дзе Ріджентс Оф Дзе Юніверсіті Оф Каліфорнія Compositions and methods for mediating plant stomatal development in response to carbon dioxide and applications for engineering drought tolerance in plants
US20150376637A1 (en) 2013-01-29 2015-12-31 The University Court Of The University Of Glasgow Methods and means for increasing stress tolerance and biomass in plants
CA3177649A1 (en) 2013-07-01 2015-01-08 Basf Se Methods and means for modulating flowering time in monocot plants
WO2016050512A1 (en) 2014-10-03 2016-04-07 Bayer Cropscience Nv Methods and means for increasing stress tolerance and biomass in plants
ES3039620T3 (en) 2016-04-06 2025-10-23 Plant Health Care Inc Hypersensitive response elicitor-derived peptides and use thereof
CA3034739A1 (en) 2016-08-22 2018-03-01 Biolumic Limited System, device and methods of seed treatment
US20190225974A1 (en) 2016-09-23 2019-07-25 BASF Agricultural Solutions Seed US LLC Targeted genome optimization in plants
WO2019002946A1 (en) 2017-06-29 2019-01-03 Biolumic Limited Method to improve crop yield and/or quality
WO2019018444A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-24 The Regents Of The University Of California Modified plants and methods for reducing cell wall methylation and recalcitrance
WO2019038594A2 (en) 2017-08-21 2019-02-28 Biolumic Limited High growth and high hardiness transgenic plants
WO2021016075A1 (en) 2019-07-19 2021-01-28 Flagship Pioneering Innovations Vi, Llc Recombinase compositions and methods of use

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993011241A1 (en) * 1991-12-06 1993-06-10 Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche Nucleotide sequences coding an endopolygalacturonase inhibitor
WO1995035387A1 (en) * 1994-06-17 1995-12-28 Epitope, Inc. Regulated expression of heterologous genes in plants and transgenic fruit with a modified ripening phenotype
WO1995035388A1 (en) * 1994-06-17 1995-12-28 Epitope, Inc. Plant genetic transformation methods and transgenic plants

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1993011241A1 (en) * 1991-12-06 1993-06-10 Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche Nucleotide sequences coding an endopolygalacturonase inhibitor
WO1995035387A1 (en) * 1994-06-17 1995-12-28 Epitope, Inc. Regulated expression of heterologous genes in plants and transgenic fruit with a modified ripening phenotype
WO1995035388A1 (en) * 1994-06-17 1995-12-28 Epitope, Inc. Plant genetic transformation methods and transgenic plants

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GOOD X ET AL: "Reduced ethylene synthesis by transgenic tomatoes expressing S-adenosylmethionine hydrolase.", PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 26 (3). 1994. 781-790., XP002031050 *
GRELLET, F., ET AL.: "A.thaliana mRNA for major latex protein type 1", EMBL SEQUENCE DATABASE, REL. 46 06-DEC-1995, ACCESSION NO. X91960, XP002031030 *
POZUETA-ROMERO, J., ET AL.: "Characterization of a family of genes encoding a fruit-specific wound-stimulated protein of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum): identification of a new family of transposable elements", PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, vol. 28, 1995, pages 1011 - 1025, XP002031051 *
WILLIAMSON, B. ET AL: "A polygalacturonase inhibitor from immature raspberry fruits: a possible new approach to grey mould control", ACTA HORTICULTURAE, (1993) NO. 352, PP. 601-606. 17 REF. MEETING INFO.: SIXTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RUBUS AND RIBES HELD AT SKIERNIEWICE, POLAND, 3-10 JULY, 1993., XP000671960 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998031812A1 (en) * 1997-01-21 1998-07-23 Monsanto Company Strawberry promoters and genes
US6080914A (en) * 1997-01-21 2000-06-27 Monsanto Company Strawberry promoters and genes
US6235482B1 (en) 1997-01-21 2001-05-22 Monsanto Company Strawberry promoters and genes
US6392030B1 (en) 1997-01-21 2002-05-21 Monsanto Technology Llc Strawberry promoters and genes
WO1999040211A3 (en) * 1998-02-06 1999-09-30 Calgene Llc Strawberry fruit promoters for gene expression
US6043410A (en) * 1998-02-06 2000-03-28 Calgene Llc Strawberry fruit promoters for gene expression
WO2000012714A1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2000-03-09 The University Of Queensland A novel plant promoter and uses therefor
US7745603B1 (en) 1998-08-31 2010-06-29 The University Of Queensland Plant promoter and uses therefor
US7202355B2 (en) 2000-06-02 2007-04-10 Kaneka Corporation DNA sequence regulating plant fruit-specific expression

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU712460B2 (en) 1999-11-04
CA2243969A1 (en) 1997-07-31
KR19990082128A (en) 1999-11-15
EP0877813A1 (en) 1998-11-18
KR19990082127A (en) 1999-11-15
US5783393A (en) 1998-07-21
AU1846697A (en) 1997-08-20
JP2000503848A (en) 2000-04-04
US5783394A (en) 1998-07-21
US5929302A (en) 1999-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU712460B2 (en) Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants
WO1996004781A1 (en) Plant group 2 promoters and uses thereof
AU2010202610B2 (en) Plant Polynucleotide Promoter Sequences From Lolium Festuca And Arabidopsis
WO2000012733A1 (en) Seed-preferred promoters from end genes
WO1998037184A9 (en) Leafy cotyledon1 genes and their uses
EP1104469A1 (en) Seed-preferred promoters
WO1996019103A1 (en) P119 promoters and their uses
AU737124B2 (en) Synthetic hybrid plant promoter
JP2002530075A (en) Promoter of gene expression in plant roots
WO2002078438A2 (en) Tissue-preferred promoter from maize
EP0409629B1 (en) Ovary tissue transcriptional factors
ES2337124T3 (en) PLATANO AND MELON PROMOTERS FOR THE EXPRESSION OF TRANSGINS IN PLANTS.
US8044263B2 (en) Cytokinin oxidase promoter from maize
AU712253B2 (en) Raspberry promoters for expression of transgenes in plants
CA2343652C (en) Plant promoters and plant terminators
US20110321188A1 (en) Solanum lycopersicum histidine decarboxylase gene-derived fruit-specific expression promoter and uses thereof
Yang et al. Activity of the Arabidopsis blue copper-binding protein gene promoter in transgenic tobacco plants upon wounding
MXPA00002755A (en) Synthetic hybrid plant promoter
JP2004534535A (en) New plant promoter

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IL IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2243969

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2243969

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1019980705849

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1997904071

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1997904071

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1019980705849

Country of ref document: KR

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1019980705849

Country of ref document: KR

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1997904071

Country of ref document: EP