WO1999026234A1 - Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999026234A1
WO1999026234A1 PCT/US1998/023251 US9823251W WO9926234A1 WO 1999026234 A1 WO1999026234 A1 WO 1999026234A1 US 9823251 W US9823251 W US 9823251W WO 9926234 A1 WO9926234 A1 WO 9926234A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
pitch
signal
speech signal
residual
generating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US1998/023251
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO1999026234B1 (en
Inventor
Suat Yeldener
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Comsat Corp
Original Assignee
Comsat Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Comsat Corp filed Critical Comsat Corp
Priority to AU13738/99A priority Critical patent/AU746342B2/en
Priority to DE69832195T priority patent/DE69832195T2/en
Priority to CA002309921A priority patent/CA2309921C/en
Priority to EP98957492A priority patent/EP1031141B1/en
Priority to IL13611798A priority patent/IL136117A/en
Publication of WO1999026234A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999026234A1/en
Publication of WO1999026234B1 publication Critical patent/WO1999026234B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L13/00—Speech synthesis; Text to speech systems
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
    • G10L25/90—Pitch determination of speech signals
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L19/00—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis
    • G10L19/04—Speech or audio signals analysis-synthesis techniques for redundancy reduction, e.g. in vocoders; Coding or decoding of speech or audio signals, using source filter models or psychoacoustic analysis using predictive techniques
    • G10L19/08—Determination or coding of the excitation function; Determination or coding of the long-term prediction parameters
    • G10L19/09—Long term prediction, i.e. removing periodical redundancies, e.g. by using adaptive codebook or pitch predictor

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a - method of pitch estimation for speech coding. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of pitch estimation which utilizes perception based analysis by synthesis for improved pitch estimation over a variety of input speech conditions.
  • CELP Code Excited Linear Prediction
  • pitch estimation still remains one of the most difficult problems in speech processing. That is, conventional pitch estimation algorithms fail to produce a robust performance over variety input conditions. This is because speech signals are not perfectly periodic signals, as assumed. Rather, speech signals are quasi-periodic or non-stationary signals. As a result, each pitch estimation method has some advantages over the others. Although some pitch estimation methods produce good performance for some input conditions, none overcome the pitch estimation problem for a variety input speech conditions.
  • a method for estimating pitch of a speech signal using perception based analysis by synthesis which provides a very robust performance and is independent of the input speech signals.
  • a pitch search range is partitioned into subranges and pitch candidates are determined for each of the subranges. After pitch candidates are selected, and Analysis by Synthesis error minimization procedure is applied to chose an optimal pitch estimate from the pitch candidates.
  • a segment of speech is analyzed using linear predictive coding (LPC) to obtain LPC filter coefficients for the block of speech.
  • LPC linear predictive coding
  • the segment of speech is then LPC inverse filtered using the LPC filter coefficients to provide a spectrally flat residual signal.
  • the residual signal is then multiplied by a window function and transformed into the frequency domain using either DFT or FFT to obtain a residual spectrum.
  • peak picking the residual spectrum is analyzed to obtain the peak amplitudes, frequencies and phases of the residual spectrum. These components are used to generate a reference residual signal using a sinusoidal synthesis.
  • LPC synthesis a reference speech signal is generated from the reference residual signal .
  • the spectral shape of the residual spectrum is sampled at the harmonics of the pitch candidate to obtain the harmonic amplitudes, frequencies and phases.
  • the harmonic components for each pitch candidate are used to generate a synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate based on the assumption that the speech is purely voiced.
  • the synthetic residual signals for each pitch candidate are then LPC synthesis filtered to generate synthetic speech signals corresponding to each candidate of pitch.
  • the generated synthetic speech signals for each pitch candidate are then compared with the reference residual signal, to determine the optimal pitch estimate based on the synthetic speech signal for the pitch candidate that provides the maximum signal to noise ratio minimum error.
  • FIG. 1 is block diagram of the perception based analysis by synthesis algorithm
  • FIGS . 2A and 2B are a block diagrams of a speech encoder and decoder, respectively, embodying the method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a typical LPC excitation spectrum with its cut-off frequency.
  • Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of the perception based analysis by synthesis method.
  • An input speech sign S (n) is provided to an pitch cost function section 1 where a pitch cost function is computed for an pitch search range and the pitch search range is partitioned into M sub-ranges.
  • partitioning is performed using uniform sub-ranges in log domain which provides for shorter sub-ranges for shorter pitch values and longer sub-ranges for longer pitch periods.
  • M sub ranges provides for shorter sub-ranges for shorter pitch values and longer sub-ranges for longer pitch periods.
  • pitch cost functions have been developed and any cost function can be used to obtain the initial pitch candidates for each sub-range.
  • the pitch cost function is a frequency domain approach developed by McAulay and Quatieri (R. J. McAulay, T. F. Quatieri "Pitch Estimation and voicingng Detection Based on Sinusoidal Speech Model” Proc . ICASSP, 1990, pp.249-252) which is expressed as follows:
  • ⁇ o are the possible fundamental frequency candidates
  • S(j ⁇ 0 ) I are the harmonic magnitudes
  • M t and ⁇ t are the peak magnitudes and frequencies, respectively
  • D (x) sin(x)
  • H is the number of harmonics corresponding to the fundamental frequency candidate, ⁇ o .
  • a segment of speech signal S(n) is analyzed in an LPC analysis section 3 where linear predicitive coding (LPC) is used to obtain LPC filter coefficients for the segment of speech.
  • LPC linear predicitive coding
  • the segment of speech is then passed through an LPC inverse filter 4 using the estimated LPC filter coefficients in order to provide a residual signal which is spectrally flat.
  • the residual signal is then multiplied by a window function (n) at multiplier 5 and transformed into the frequency domain to provide a residual spectrum using either DFT (or FFT) in a DFT section 6.
  • peak picking section 7 the residual spectrum is analyzed to determine the peak amplitudes and corresponding frequencies and phases.
  • the peak components are used to generate a reference residual (excitation) signal which is defined by:
  • P l where L is number of peaks in the residual spectrum, and A , ⁇ , and ⁇ are the p peak magnitudes, frequencies and phases respectively .
  • the reference residual signal is then passed through an LPC synthesis filter 9 to obtain a reference speech signal.
  • the envelope or spectral shape of the residual spectrum is calculated in a spectral envelope section 10.
  • the envelope of the residual spectrum is sampled at the harmonics of the corresponding pitch candidate to determine the harmonic amplitudes and phases for each pitch candidate in a harmonic sampling section 11.
  • These harmonic components are provided to a sinusoidal synthesis section 12 where they are used to generate a harmonic synthetic residual (excitation) signal for each pitch candidate based on the assumption that the speech signal is purely voiced.
  • the synthetic residual signal can be formulated as:
  • H is number harmonics in the in the residual spectrum
  • M h , ⁇ 0 , and ⁇ h are the p harmonic magnitudes, candidate fundamental frequency and harmonic phases respectively.
  • the synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate is then passed through a LPC synthesis filter 13 to obtain a synthetic speech signal for each pitch candidate. This process is repeated for each candidate of pitch, and a synthetic speech signal corresponding to each candidate of pitch is generated.
  • Each of the synthetic speech signals are then compared with the reference signal in an adder 14 to obtain a signal to noise ratio for each of the synthetic speech signals.
  • the pitch candidate having a synthetic speech signal that provides the minimum error or maximum signal to noise ratio is chosen as the optimal pitch estimate in a perceptual error minimization section 15.
  • a formant weighting as in CELP type coders, is used to emphasize the formant frequencies rather than the formant nulls since formant regions are more important than the other frequencies. Furthermore, during sinusoidal synthesis another amplitude weighting function is used which provides more attention to the low frequency components than the high frequency components since the low frequency components are perceptually more important than the high frequency components.
  • the above described method of pitch estimation is utilized in a Harmonic Excited Linear
  • HE -LPC Predictive Coder
  • Fig. 2A the approach to representing a speech signal s . (n) is to use a speech production model where speech is formed as the result of passing an excitation signal e(n) through a linear time varying LPC inverse filter, that models the resonant characteristics of the speech spectral envelope.
  • the LPC inverse filter is represented by ten LPC coefficients which are quantized in the form of line spectral frequency (LSF) .
  • the excitation signal e(n) is specified by the fundamental frequency, it energy ⁇ 0 and a voicing probability P v that defines a cut-off frequency ( ⁇ c ) - assuming the LPC excitation spectrum is flat.
  • the excitation spectrum has been assumed to be flat where LPC is perfect model and provides an energy level throughout the entire speech spectrum, the LPC is not necessarily a perfect model since it does not completely remove the speech spectral shape to leave a relatively flat spectrum. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of MHE-LPC speech model, the LPC excitation spectrum is divided into various non-uniform bands (12-16 bands) and an energy level corresponding to each band is computed for the representation of the LPC excitation spectral shape.
  • Fig. 3 shows a typical residual/excitation spectrum and its cut-off frequency.
  • the cut-off frequency ( ⁇ c ) illustrates the voiced (when frequency ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ c ) and unvoiced (when ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ c ) parts of the speech spectrum.
  • a synthetic excitation spectrum is formed using estimated pitch and harmonic magnitudes of pitch frequency, based on the assumption that the speech signal is purely voiced.
  • the original and synthetic excitation spectra corresponding to each harmonic of fundamental frequency are then compared to find the binary v/uv decision for each harmonic.
  • the harmonic when the normalized error over each harmonic is less than a determined threshold, the harmonic is declared to be voiced, otherwise it is declared to be unvoiced.
  • the voicing probability P v is then determined by the ratio between voiced harmonics and the total number of harmonics within 4 kHz speech bandwidth.
  • the voicing cut-off frequency ⁇ c is proportional to voicing and is expressed by the following formula:
  • the voiced part of the excitation spectrum is determined as the sum of harmonic sine waves which fall below the cut-off frequency ( ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ c ) .
  • the harmonic phases of sine waves are predicted from the previous frame ' s information.
  • a white random noise spectrum normalized to excitation band energies is used for the frequency components that fall above the cut-off frequency ( ⁇ > ⁇ c ) .
  • the voiced and unvoiced excitation signals are then added together to form the overall synthesized excitation signal.
  • the resultant excitation is then shaped by a linear time-varying LPC filter to form the final synthesized speech.
  • a frequency domain post-filter In order to enhance the output speech quality and make it cleaner, a frequency domain post-filter is used.
  • This post-filter causes the formants to narrow and reduces the depth of the formant nulls thereby attenuating the noise in the formant nulls and enhancing the output speech.
  • the post- filter produces good performance over the whole speech spectrum unlike previously reported time-domain post -filters which tend to attenuate the speech signal in the high frequency regions, thereby introducing spectral tilt and hence muffling in the output speech.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Compression, Expansion, Code Conversion, And Decoders (AREA)
  • Measurement Of Mechanical Vibrations Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a method of pitch estimation which utilizes perception based analysis by synthesis for improved pitch estimation over a variety of input speech conditions. Initially, pitch candidates are generated corresponding to a plurality of sub-ranges within a pitch search range (item 2). Then a residual spectrum is determined for a segment of speech (item 4) and a reference speech signal is generated from the residual spectrum using sinusoidal synthesis (item 8) and linear predictive coding (LPC) synthesis (item 9). A synthetic speech signal is generated for each of the pitch candidates using sinusoidal (item 12) and LPC synthesis (item 13). Finally, the synthetic speech signal for each pitch candidate is compared with the reference residual signal (item 14) to determine an optimal pitch estimate based on a pitch period of a synthetic speech signal that provides a maximum signal to noise ratio.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PITCH ESTIMATION USING PERCEPTION BASED ANALYSIS BY SYNTHESIS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a - method of pitch estimation for speech coding. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of pitch estimation which utilizes perception based analysis by synthesis for improved pitch estimation over a variety of input speech conditions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
An accurate representation of voiced or mixed type of speech signals is essential for synthesizing very high quality speech at low bit rates (4.8 kbit/s and below) . For bit rates of 4.8 kbit/s and below, conventional Code Excited Linear Prediction (CELP) does not provide the appropriate degree of periodicity. The small code-book size and coarse quantization of gain factors at these rates result in large spectral fluctuations between the pitch harmonics. Alternative speech coding algorithms to CELP are the Harmonic type techniques. However, these techniques require a robust pitch algorithm to produce a high quality speech. Therefore, one of the most prevalent features in speech signals is the periodicity of voiced speech known as pitch. The pitch contribution is very significant in terms of the natural quality of speech. Although many different pitch estimation methods have been developed, pitch estimation still remains one of the most difficult problems in speech processing. That is, conventional pitch estimation algorithms fail to produce a robust performance over variety input conditions. This is because speech signals are not perfectly periodic signals, as assumed. Rather, speech signals are quasi-periodic or non-stationary signals. As a result, each pitch estimation method has some advantages over the others. Although some pitch estimation methods produce good performance for some input conditions, none overcome the pitch estimation problem for a variety input speech conditions.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the invention, a method is provided for estimating pitch of a speech signal using perception based analysis by synthesis which provides a very robust performance and is independent of the input speech signals.
Initially, a pitch search range is partitioned into subranges and pitch candidates are determined for each of the subranges. After pitch candidates are selected, and Analysis by Synthesis error minimization procedure is applied to chose an optimal pitch estimate from the pitch candidates.
First, a segment of speech is analyzed using linear predictive coding (LPC) to obtain LPC filter coefficients for the block of speech. The segment of speech is then LPC inverse filtered using the LPC filter coefficients to provide a spectrally flat residual signal. The residual signal is then multiplied by a window function and transformed into the frequency domain using either DFT or FFT to obtain a residual spectrum. Next, using peak picking the residual spectrum is analyzed to obtain the peak amplitudes, frequencies and phases of the residual spectrum. These components are used to generate a reference residual signal using a sinusoidal synthesis. Using LPC synthesis, a reference speech signal is generated from the reference residual signal .
For each candidate of pitch, the spectral shape of the residual spectrum is sampled at the harmonics of the pitch candidate to obtain the harmonic amplitudes, frequencies and phases. Using sinusoidal synthesis, the harmonic components for each pitch candidate are used to generate a synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate based on the assumption that the speech is purely voiced. The synthetic residual signals for each pitch candidate are then LPC synthesis filtered to generate synthetic speech signals corresponding to each candidate of pitch. The generated synthetic speech signals for each pitch candidate are then compared with the reference residual signal, to determine the optimal pitch estimate based on the synthetic speech signal for the pitch candidate that provides the maximum signal to noise ratio minimum error.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Below the present invention is described in detail with reference to the enclosed figures, in which:
FIG. 1 is block diagram of the perception based analysis by synthesis algorithm;
FIGS . 2A and 2B are a block diagrams of a speech encoder and decoder, respectively, embodying the method of the present invention; and FIG. 3 is a typical LPC excitation spectrum with its cut-off frequency.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of the perception based analysis by synthesis method. An input speech sign S (n) is provided to an pitch cost function section 1 where a pitch cost function is computed for an pitch search range and the pitch search range is partitioned into M sub-ranges. In the preferred embodiment, partitioning is performed using uniform sub-ranges in log domain which provides for shorter sub-ranges for shorter pitch values and longer sub-ranges for longer pitch periods. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that many rules to divide the pitch search range into M sub ranges can be used. Likewise, many pitch cost functions have been developed and any cost function can be used to obtain the initial pitch candidates for each sub-range. In the preferred embodiment, the pitch cost function is a frequency domain approach developed by McAulay and Quatieri (R. J. McAulay, T. F. Quatieri "Pitch Estimation and Voicing Detection Based on Sinusoidal Speech Model" Proc . ICASSP, 1990, pp.249-252) which is expressed as follows:
(jω0) IjmaxtWj D( ω1 - jω0) ] -- |*S( ω0) |l
Figure imgf000006_0001
where ωo are the possible fundamental frequency candidates, |S(jω0) I are the harmonic magnitudes, Mt and ωt are the peak magnitudes and frequencies, respectively, and D (x) = sin(x), and H is the number of harmonics corresponding to the fundamental frequency candidate, ωo. The pitch cost function is then evaluated for each of the M sub-ranges in a compute pitch candidate section 2 to obtain a pitch candidate for each of the M sub-ranges.
After pitch candidates are determined, an Analysis By Synthesis error minimization procedure is applied to chose the most optimal pitch estimate. First, a segment of speech signal S(n) is analyzed in an LPC analysis section 3 where linear predicitive coding (LPC) is used to obtain LPC filter coefficients for the segment of speech. The segment of speech is then passed through an LPC inverse filter 4 using the estimated LPC filter coefficients in order to provide a residual signal which is spectrally flat. The residual signal is then multiplied by a window function (n) at multiplier 5 and transformed into the frequency domain to provide a residual spectrum using either DFT (or FFT) in a DFT section 6. Next, in peak picking section 7, the residual spectrum is analyzed to determine the peak amplitudes and corresponding frequencies and phases. In a sinusoidal synthesis section, the peak components are used to generate a reference residual (excitation) signal which is defined by:
L x (n) =∑ Ap cos (nωp + θp)
P=l where L is number of peaks in the residual spectrum, and A , ω , and θ are the p peak magnitudes, frequencies and phases respectively .
The reference residual signal is then passed through an LPC synthesis filter 9 to obtain a reference speech signal.
In order to obtain the harmonic amplitudes for each candidate of pitch, the envelope or spectral shape of the residual spectrum is calculated in a spectral envelope section 10. For each candidate of pitch, the envelope of the residual spectrum is sampled at the harmonics of the corresponding pitch candidate to determine the harmonic amplitudes and phases for each pitch candidate in a harmonic sampling section 11. These harmonic components are provided to a sinusoidal synthesis section 12 where they are used to generate a harmonic synthetic residual (excitation) signal for each pitch candidate based on the assumption that the speech signal is purely voiced. The synthetic residual signal can be formulated as:
f {n) =∑ Mh cos (n h ωp + ΘΛ) h-i
where H is number harmonics in the in the residual spectrum, and Mh, ω0, and θh are the p harmonic magnitudes, candidate fundamental frequency and harmonic phases respectively. The synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate is then passed through a LPC synthesis filter 13 to obtain a synthetic speech signal for each pitch candidate. This process is repeated for each candidate of pitch, and a synthetic speech signal corresponding to each candidate of pitch is generated. Each of the synthetic speech signals are then compared with the reference signal in an adder 14 to obtain a signal to noise ratio for each of the synthetic speech signals. Lastly, the pitch candidate having a synthetic speech signal that provides the minimum error or maximum signal to noise ratio, is chosen as the optimal pitch estimate in a perceptual error minimization section 15. During the error minimization process carried out by the error minimization section 15, a formant weighting as in CELP type coders, is used to emphasize the formant frequencies rather than the formant nulls since formant regions are more important than the other frequencies. Furthermore, during sinusoidal synthesis another amplitude weighting function is used which provides more attention to the low frequency components than the high frequency components since the low frequency components are perceptually more important than the high frequency components. In one embodiment, the above described method of pitch estimation is utilized in a Harmonic Excited Linear
Predictive Coder (HE -LPC) as shown in the block diagrams of Figs. 2A and 2B. In the HE-LPC encoder (Fig. 2A) , the approach to representing a speech signal s.(n) is to use a speech production model where speech is formed as the result of passing an excitation signal e(n) through a linear time varying LPC inverse filter, that models the resonant characteristics of the speech spectral envelope. The LPC inverse filter is represented by ten LPC coefficients which are quantized in the form of line spectral frequency (LSF) .
In the HE-LPC, the excitation signal e(n) is specified by the fundamental frequency, it energy σ0 and a voicing probability Pv that defines a cut-off frequency (ωc) - assuming the LPC excitation spectrum is flat. Although the excitation spectrum has been assumed to be flat where LPC is perfect model and provides an energy level throughout the entire speech spectrum, the LPC is not necessarily a perfect model since it does not completely remove the speech spectral shape to leave a relatively flat spectrum. Therefore, in order to improve the quality of MHE-LPC speech model, the LPC excitation spectrum is divided into various non-uniform bands (12-16 bands) and an energy level corresponding to each band is computed for the representation of the LPC excitation spectral shape. As a result, the speech quality of the MHE-LPC speech model is improved significantly. Fig. 3 shows a typical residual/excitation spectrum and its cut-off frequency. The cut-off frequency (ωc) illustrates the voiced (when frequency ω < ωc) and unvoiced (when ω ≥ ωc) parts of the speech spectrum. In order to estimate the voicing probab-ility of each speech frame, a synthetic excitation spectrum is formed using estimated pitch and harmonic magnitudes of pitch frequency, based on the assumption that the speech signal is purely voiced. The original and synthetic excitation spectra corresponding to each harmonic of fundamental frequency are then compared to find the binary v/uv decision for each harmonic. In this case, when the normalized error over each harmonic is less than a determined threshold, the harmonic is declared to be voiced, otherwise it is declared to be unvoiced. The voicing probability Pv is then determined by the ratio between voiced harmonics and the total number of harmonics within 4 kHz speech bandwidth. The voicing cut-off frequency ωc is proportional to voicing and is expressed by the following formula:
ωc = 4P^ (kHz)
Representing the voicing information using the concept of voicing probability introduced an efficient way to represent the mixed type of speech signals with noticeable improvement in speech quality. Although, multi-band excitation requires many bits to represent the voicing information, since the voicing determination is not perfect model, there may be voicing errors at low frequency bands which introduces noise and artifacts in the synthesized speech. However, using the voicing probability concept as defined above completely eliminates this problem with better efficiency.
At the decoder (Fig. 2B) , the voiced part of the excitation spectrum is determined as the sum of harmonic sine waves which fall below the cut-off frequency (ω < ωc) . The harmonic phases of sine waves are predicted from the previous frame ' s information. For the unvoiced part of the excitation spectrum, a white random noise spectrum normalized to excitation band energies, is used for the frequency components that fall above the cut-off frequency (ω > ωc) . The voiced and unvoiced excitation signals are then added together to form the overall synthesized excitation signal. The resultant excitation is then shaped by a linear time-varying LPC filter to form the final synthesized speech. In order to enhance the output speech quality and make it cleaner, a frequency domain post-filter is used. This post-filter causes the formants to narrow and reduces the depth of the formant nulls thereby attenuating the noise in the formant nulls and enhancing the output speech. The post- filter produces good performance over the whole speech spectrum unlike previously reported time-domain post -filters which tend to attenuate the speech signal in the high frequency regions, thereby introducing spectral tilt and hence muffling in the output speech.
Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to preferred embodiments, various changes and modifications within the scope of the invention will readily occur to those skilled in the art.

Claims

What is claimed is :
1. A method for estimating pitch of a speech signal comprising the steps of : generating a plurality of pitch candidates corresponding to a plurality of sub-ranges within a pitch search range; generating a reference speech signal corresponding to a segment of speech; generating a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates; and comparing the synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates with the reference speech signal to determine an optimal pitch estimate.
2. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 1, wherein said optimal pitch estimate is determined based on a synthetic speech signal for a pitch candidate that provides a maximum signal to noise ratio.
3. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 1, wherein said step of generating a reference speech signal comprises the substeps of: generating a residual signal by linear predictive coding (LPC) inverse filtering a segment of the speech signal using LPC filter coefficients generated by LPC analysis of the segment of speech; generating a residual spectrum by Fourier transforming the residual signal into the frequency domain; analyzing the residual spectrum to determine amplitudes, frequencies and phases of peaks of the residual spectrum; generating a reference residual signal from the peak amplitudes, frequencies and phases of the residual spectrum using sinusoidal synthesis; and generating a reference speech signal by LPC synthesis filtering the reference residual signal.
4. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 1, wherein said step of generating a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates comprises the substeps of : determining the spectral shape of the residual spectrum; sampling the spectral shape of the residual spectrum at the harmonics of each of the plurality of pitch candidates to determine harmonic components for each pitch candidate; generating a synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate from the harmonic components for each of the plurality of pitch candidates using sinusoidal synthesis; and generating a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates by LPC synthesis filtering- the synthetic residual signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates .
5. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 3, wherein said step of generating a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates comprises the substeps of: determining the spectral shape of the residual spectrum; sampling the spectral shape of the residual spectrum at the harmonics of each of the plurality of pitch candidates to determine harmonic components for each pitch candidate; generating a synthetic residual signal for each pitch candidate from the harmonic components for each of the plurality of pitch candidates using sinusoidal synthesis; and generating a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates by LPC synthesis filtering the synthetic residual signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates.
6. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 4, wherein said substep of generating a a synthetic residual signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates is performed based on the assumption that the speech signal is purely voiced.
7. The method for estimating pitch of a speech signal as recited in claim 5, wherein said optimal pitch estimate is determined based on a synthetic speech signal for a pitch candidate that provides a maximum signal to noise ratio.
8. A method or estimating pitch of a speech signal comprising the steps of : determining a plurality of pitch candidates each corresponding to a sub-range within a pitch search range; analyzing a segment of a speech signal using linear predictive coding (LPC) to generate LPC filter coefficients for the acoustic signal segment;
LPC inverse filtering the speech signal segment using the LPC filter coefficients to provide a residual signal which is spectrally flat; transforming the residual signal into the frequency domain to generate a residual spectrum; analyzing the residual spectrum to determine peak amplitudes and corresponding frequencies and phases of the residual spectrum; generating a reference residual signal from the peak amplitudes, frequencies and phases of the residual spectrum using sinusoidal synthesis; generating a reference speech signal by LPC synthesis filtering the reference residual signal; performing harmonic sampling for each of the plurality of pitch candidates to determine the harmonic components for each of the plurality of the plurality of pitch candidates; generating a synthetic residual signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates from the harmonic components for each of the plurality of pitch candidates using sinusoidal synthesis;
LPC synthesis filtering the synthetic residual signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates to generate a synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality of pitch candidates; and comparing each of the synthetic speech signal for each of the plurality pitch candidates with the reference residual signal to determine an optimal pitch estimate based on a synthetic speech signal for a pitch that provides a maximum signal to noise ratio.
PCT/US1998/023251 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis Ceased WO1999026234A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU13738/99A AU746342B2 (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis
DE69832195T DE69832195T2 (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method for fundamental frequency determination using well-based analysis by synthesis
CA002309921A CA2309921C (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis
EP98957492A EP1031141B1 (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method for pitch estimation using perception-based analysis by synthesis
IL13611798A IL136117A (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/970,396 US5999897A (en) 1997-11-14 1997-11-14 Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis
US08/970,396 1997-11-14

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999026234A1 true WO1999026234A1 (en) 1999-05-27
WO1999026234B1 WO1999026234B1 (en) 1999-07-01

Family

ID=25516886

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/023251 Ceased WO1999026234A1 (en) 1997-11-14 1998-11-16 Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US5999897A (en)
EP (1) EP1031141B1 (en)
KR (1) KR100383377B1 (en)
AU (1) AU746342B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2309921C (en)
DE (1) DE69832195T2 (en)
IL (1) IL136117A (en)
WO (1) WO1999026234A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007033147A1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-03-22 Voice Signal Technologies, Inc. Methods and apparatus for formant-based voice synthesis
WO2013107666A1 (en) * 2012-01-17 2013-07-25 Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Method and device for processing water-borne sound signals

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2252170A1 (en) * 1998-10-27 2000-04-27 Bruno Bessette A method and device for high quality coding of wideband speech and audio signals
US6766288B1 (en) 1998-10-29 2004-07-20 Paul Reed Smith Guitars Fast find fundamental method
US7194752B1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2007-03-20 Iceberg Industries, Llc Method and apparatus for automatically recognizing input audio and/or video streams
WO2001030049A1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2001-04-26 Fujitsu Limited Received speech processing unit and received speech reproducing unit
US6480821B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-11-12 Motorola, Inc. Methods and apparatus for reducing noise associated with an electrical speech signal
JP3582589B2 (en) * 2001-03-07 2004-10-27 日本電気株式会社 Speech coding apparatus and speech decoding apparatus
US20040158462A1 (en) * 2001-06-11 2004-08-12 Rutledge Glen J. Pitch candidate selection method for multi-channel pitch detectors
KR100446242B1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2004-08-30 엘지전자 주식회사 Apparatus and Method for Estimating Hamonic in Voice-Encoder
EP1783604A3 (en) * 2005-11-07 2007-10-03 Slawomir Adam Janczewski Object-oriented, parallel language, method of programming and multi-processor computer
KR100647336B1 (en) * 2005-11-08 2006-11-23 삼성전자주식회사 Adaptive Time / Frequency-based Audio Coding / Decoding Apparatus and Method
KR100735343B1 (en) * 2006-04-11 2007-07-04 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for extracting pitch information of speech signal
KR20070115637A (en) * 2006-06-03 2007-12-06 삼성전자주식회사 Bandwidth extension encoding and decoding method and apparatus
KR100860830B1 (en) * 2006-12-13 2008-09-30 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for estimating spectral information of speech signal
US8935158B2 (en) 2006-12-13 2015-01-13 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for comparing frames using spectral information of audio signal
CN101030374B (en) * 2007-03-26 2011-02-16 北京中星微电子有限公司 Method and apparatus for extracting base sound period
WO2010091554A1 (en) * 2009-02-13 2010-08-19 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for pitch period detection
US8924222B2 (en) * 2010-07-30 2014-12-30 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems, methods, apparatus, and computer-readable media for coding of harmonic signals
US9208792B2 (en) 2010-08-17 2015-12-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems, methods, apparatus, and computer-readable media for noise injection
US8862465B2 (en) * 2010-09-17 2014-10-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Determining pitch cycle energy and scaling an excitation signal
EP2685448B1 (en) * 2012-07-12 2018-09-05 Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH Engine sound synthesis
GB201713946D0 (en) * 2017-06-16 2017-10-18 Cirrus Logic Int Semiconductor Ltd Earbud speech estimation
US10861484B2 (en) * 2018-12-10 2020-12-08 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Methods and systems for speech detection

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5666464A (en) * 1993-08-26 1997-09-09 Nec Corporation Speech pitch coding system

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0754440B2 (en) * 1986-06-09 1995-06-07 日本電気株式会社 Speech analysis / synthesis device
NL8701798A (en) * 1987-07-30 1989-02-16 Philips Nv METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE PROGRESS OF A VOICE PARAMETER, FOR EXAMPLE THE TONE HEIGHT, IN A SPEECH SIGNAL
US4980916A (en) * 1989-10-26 1990-12-25 General Electric Company Method for improving speech quality in code excited linear predictive speech coding
US5216747A (en) * 1990-09-20 1993-06-01 Digital Voice Systems, Inc. Voiced/unvoiced estimation of an acoustic signal
US5226108A (en) * 1990-09-20 1993-07-06 Digital Voice Systems, Inc. Processing a speech signal with estimated pitch
US5327518A (en) * 1991-08-22 1994-07-05 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Audio analysis/synthesis system
FI95085C (en) * 1992-05-11 1995-12-11 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd A method for digitally encoding a speech signal and a speech encoder for performing the method
US5734789A (en) * 1992-06-01 1998-03-31 Hughes Electronics Voiced, unvoiced or noise modes in a CELP vocoder
JP3343965B2 (en) * 1992-10-31 2002-11-11 ソニー株式会社 Voice encoding method and decoding method
FI95086C (en) * 1992-11-26 1995-12-11 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd Method for efficient coding of a speech signal
IT1270438B (en) * 1993-06-10 1997-05-05 Sip PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL TONE PERIOD AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE VOICE SIGNAL IN NUMERICAL CODERS OF THE VOICE
JP3475446B2 (en) * 1993-07-27 2003-12-08 ソニー株式会社 Encoding method

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5666464A (en) * 1993-08-26 1997-09-09 Nec Corporation Speech pitch coding system

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007033147A1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2007-03-22 Voice Signal Technologies, Inc. Methods and apparatus for formant-based voice synthesis
US8447592B2 (en) 2005-09-13 2013-05-21 Nuance Communications, Inc. Methods and apparatus for formant-based voice systems
US8706488B2 (en) 2005-09-13 2014-04-22 Nuance Communications, Inc. Methods and apparatus for formant-based voice synthesis
WO2013107666A1 (en) * 2012-01-17 2013-07-25 Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Method and device for processing water-borne sound signals
AU2013211192B2 (en) * 2012-01-17 2015-04-09 Atlas Elektronik Gmbh Method and device for processing water-borne sound signals

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR100383377B1 (en) 2003-05-12
US5999897A (en) 1999-12-07
EP1031141B1 (en) 2005-11-02
DE69832195T2 (en) 2006-08-03
CA2309921A1 (en) 1999-05-27
DE69832195D1 (en) 2005-12-08
CA2309921C (en) 2004-06-15
KR20010024639A (en) 2001-03-26
IL136117A0 (en) 2001-05-20
WO1999026234B1 (en) 1999-07-01
EP1031141A4 (en) 2002-01-02
IL136117A (en) 2004-07-25
AU1373899A (en) 1999-06-07
EP1031141A1 (en) 2000-08-30
AU746342B2 (en) 2002-04-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5999897A (en) Method and apparatus for pitch estimation using perception based analysis by synthesis
McCree et al. A mixed excitation LPC vocoder model for low bit rate speech coding
US7257535B2 (en) Parametric speech codec for representing synthetic speech in the presence of background noise
US6912495B2 (en) Speech model and analysis, synthesis, and quantization methods
US6931373B1 (en) Prototype waveform phase modeling for a frequency domain interpolative speech codec system
US6871176B2 (en) Phase excited linear prediction encoder
US7013269B1 (en) Voicing measure for a speech CODEC system
US6098036A (en) Speech coding system and method including spectral formant enhancer
US6963833B1 (en) Modifications in the multi-band excitation (MBE) model for generating high quality speech at low bit rates
Kleijn et al. The RCELP speech‐coding algorithm
CN1138183A (en) Method of adapting noise masking level in analysis-by-synthesis speech coder employing short-team perceptual weichting filter
US6456965B1 (en) Multi-stage pitch and mixed voicing estimation for harmonic speech coders
US6253171B1 (en) Method of determining the voicing probability of speech signals
Kleijn et al. A 5.85 kbits CELP algorithm for cellular applications
Cho et al. A spectrally mixed excitation (SMX) vocoder with robust parameter determination
KR20010029497A (en) Transmitter with an improved harmonic speech encoder
Yeldener et al. A mixed sinusoidally excited linear prediction coder at 4 kb/s and below
US6438517B1 (en) Multi-stage pitch and mixed voicing estimation for harmonic speech coders
Kim et al. A multi-resolution sinusoidal model using adaptive analysis frame
Kleijn Improved pitch prediction
Trancoso et al. Harmonic postprocessing off speech synthesised by stochastic coders
Zhang et al. A 2400 bps improved MBELP vocoder
Yeldener et al. Low bit rate speech coding at 1.2 and 2.4 kb/s
Kondoz et al. The Turkish narrow band voice coding and noise pre-processing Nato Candidate
Yeldner et al. A mixed harmonic excitation linear predictive speech coding for low bit rate applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 136117

Country of ref document: IL

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU CA IL KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AU CA IL KR

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2309921

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2309921

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020007005286

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13738/99

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1998957492

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1998957492

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020007005286

Country of ref document: KR

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 13738/99

Country of ref document: AU

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1020007005286

Country of ref document: KR

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1998957492

Country of ref document: EP