WO2005099362A2 - Mine counter measure system - Google Patents

Mine counter measure system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005099362A2
WO2005099362A2 PCT/US2004/033980 US2004033980W WO2005099362A2 WO 2005099362 A2 WO2005099362 A2 WO 2005099362A2 US 2004033980 W US2004033980 W US 2004033980W WO 2005099362 A2 WO2005099362 A2 WO 2005099362A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rod
rods
housing
explosive
stabilizer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2004/033980
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2005099362A3 (en
Inventor
Richard M. Lloyd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Raytheon Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Raytheon Co filed Critical Raytheon Co
Priority to JP2006535674A priority Critical patent/JP2007508524A/en
Priority to CA002541786A priority patent/CA2541786C/en
Priority to EP04821778A priority patent/EP1737728A4/en
Publication of WO2005099362A2 publication Critical patent/WO2005099362A2/en
Priority to IL174859A priority patent/IL174859A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Publication of WO2005099362A3 publication Critical patent/WO2005099362A3/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
    • F42B12/56—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies
    • F42B12/58—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles
    • F42B12/62—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles the submissiles being ejected parallel to the longitudinal axis of the projectile
    • F42B12/64—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles the submissiles being ejected parallel to the longitudinal axis of the projectile the submissiles being of shot- or flechette-type
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/12—Means for clearing land minefields; Systems specially adapted for detection of landmines
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/20—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type
    • F42B12/201—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type characterised by target class
    • F42B12/202—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of high-explosive type characterised by target class for attacking land area or area targets, e.g. airburst
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/36—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
    • F42B12/56—Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing discrete solid bodies
    • F42B12/58—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles
    • F42B12/60—Cluster or cargo ammunition, i.e. projectiles containing one or more submissiles the submissiles being ejected radially

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a land mine counter measure system.
  • the idea of detonating land mines using conventional weapons and ordinances is known but such methods are not very effective or efficient since many ordinances would be required to detonate the numerous possible land mines in a given area.
  • One current idea is to deploy a net carrying shape charges onto the land mine field. But, never is there a guarantee that all the land mines would be detonated and, worse, some shape charges could fail to detonate resulting in an added explosive danger to personnel who then enter onto the land mine field. Also, this approach would not be used during a war where troops are required to engage the enemy from the beach. Also, land mines are often buried 6 inches beneath the sand on a beach and also beneath the sand under two or more feet of water. Conventional approaches fail to effectively counter such tactics during wartime.
  • each rod has a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine.
  • each rod has a length to diameter ratio of greater than 5 and preferably a length to diameter ratio greater than or equal to 10.
  • the stabilizer is a plurality of fins on the distal end of each rod.
  • the stabilizer is a flared distal end of the rod.
  • the proximal end of each rod is pointed.
  • the proximal end of each rod includes a poly-wedge shape to decrease the drag on the rod.
  • the center of gravity of each rod is proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward.
  • a foam body in the housing between the rods and the explosive may be a foam body in the housing about the rods between the housing and the explosive.
  • the rods are packaged in coaxially aligned rings and there are coaxially aligned foam bodies between each ring of rods.
  • the rods may have a circular cross sectional shape, a cruciform cross sectional shape, or a tristar cross sectional shape.
  • the housing is a shell.
  • the housing is a payload. Further included may be a missile for deploying a plurality of said payloads.
  • the rods are staggered in the housing for better packaging efficiency.
  • One mine counter measure system in accordance with this invention includes a housing, an explosive in the housing, a plurality of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine, each rod having a length to diameter ratio of greater than or equal to 10, each rod having a poly- wedge shaped proximal end, and foam in the housing between the rods and the explosive core.
  • One mine counter measure system in accordance with this invention features a plurality of munition housings each including, an explosive, and a plurality of kinetic energy rods about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine and each rod
  • a carrier deploys the munition housings over a minefield.
  • This invention also features a method of destroying mines in a minefield buried under the surface. The method comprises deploying a munition including a plurality of kinetic energy rods each having a stabilizer into a position above the minefield and deploying the rods above the minefield to fall towards the minefield each aligned along a velocity vector to penetrate the surface and destroy the mines.
  • a plurality of the minefields are carried to a position above the minefield and deploying includes detonating an explosive core in each minefield surrounded by the rods.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view showing the deployment of the mine counter measure system of the subject invention
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a projectile for deploying the munitions of the subject invention
  • Fig. 3 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a munition in accordance with the subject invention
  • Fig. 4 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a kinetic energy rod in accordance with the subject invention
  • Fig. 5 is a schematic view showing the deployment of the kinetic energy rods of Fig. 4 from the munition of Fig. 3 onto a minefield;
  • Fig. 6 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing another embodiment of a kinetic energy rod in accordance with the subject invention;
  • Fig. 7 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing a tristar rod configuration in accordance with the subject invention;
  • Fig. 8 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing a cruciform rod configuration in accordance with the subject invention;
  • Fig. 9 is a schematic partial view showing staggered kinetic energy rods for better packaging efficiency in accordance with the subject invention;
  • Fig. 11 is a cross sectional view showing a munition with a number of kinetic energy rods in accordance with the subject invention;
  • Fig. 12 is a drawing which characterizes the lethality of the mine counter measure system of the subject invention;
  • Fig. 13 is a graph comparing penetrator mass to impact velocity.
  • Mine counter measure system 10, Fig. 1 includes, in one example, missile 12 deployed from ship or submarine 14 or other launcher. In this specific example,
  • missile 12 is an XM 982 Excalibur 155 mm long range guided missile with GPS tracking capability and having a trajectory optimized for range and time of arrival at position A and then having a trajectory optimized for rod delivery at position B over minefield 14.
  • Other ordinances and delivery mechanisms are within the scope of this invention.
  • missile 12 includes bays 18 housing deployable munitions, shells, or other payloads 20 discussed infra.
  • Missile 12 also includes antijam GPS/IMU navigation section 22, guidance and electronic unit section 24, inductive fuse setter interface 26, control and actuator section 28, and fin stabilizer base section 30.
  • each munition or shell 20 includes munition housing 32, explosive core 34, and a number of kinetic energy rods 36 in housing 12 about core 34.
  • each rod 36, Fig. 4 includes some kind of stabilizer 40 which, in this example, is a flared end.
  • each rod is made of tungsten or tantalum and has a length to diameter ratio of greater than 5 and typically greater than or equal to 10.
  • mines 50 are buried beneath sand and/or water and missile 12
  • Figs. 1-2 has reached deployment position B
  • Fig. 1 whereupon munitions 20, Figs. 2-3 are deployed and explosive core 34
  • Fig. 3 detonated which sprays rods 36, Fig. 5 into a desired pattern, each rod aligned along its velocity vector to penetrate the surface above a mine 50 thereby destroying it.
  • kinetic energy rod 36' includes a stabilizer in the form of fins 60 on the distal end of each rod and the proximal end of rod 36 includes pointed poly-wedge shaped tip 38.
  • This penetrator nose is designed to reduce air drag (CD) allowing the penetrator to fly faster for longer period of time and enhance its over all stability.
  • CD air drag
  • each rod is located proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward upon deployment from housing 12, Fig. 5.
  • the rods may also have a non-circular cross section as shown for rod 36", Fig. 7 (a tristar configuration), and rod 36'", Fig. 8, (a cruciform construction).
  • the fins of the rods can be staggered in the munition or shell for better packaging efficiency.
  • rods 36 are packaged in coaxially aligned rings A, B, and D with coaxially aligned rings W, X, and Y of foam between each adjacent ring of rods.
  • the explosive used between each ring would typically be a detasheet or a PBX based explosive.
  • foam body 38' is about rods 36 between housing 32 and explosive core 34.
  • munition 20 may be a shell launched, for example, from a gun subsystem as opposed to missile 12, Figs. 1-2. Munition 20 would then include a time
  • Fig. 12 demonstrates the high lethality obtained by the system of this invention based on computer modeling. A generic minefield was generated and each mine was placed three feet apart while each row was five feet apart.
  • a highly dense spray pattern of 30 gm rods with a length to diameter ratio of 10 impacting the minefield nearly kills all of the mines in a 10 foot by 12 foot area. With a 1000 rods and a burst point at a higher altitude, there is a significant increase in the number of mines that were hit with multiple rod impacts. This calculation demonstrates that an extremely large area minefield can be made safe provided that the proper burse point for a given number of projectiles is selected.
  • the system of the subject invention also takes into account the effects of water and sand on penetration. Mines that lie on shore can be covered with up to 6 inches of dry or wet sand while mines in the surf zone can be covered with sand and water up to 2 foot. Fig.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Portable Nailing Machines And Staplers (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Elimination Of Static Electricity (AREA)

Abstract

A mine counter measure system and method. There is an explosive in a housing and a number of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive. Each rod has a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine.

Description

MINE COUNTER MEASURE SYSTEM
FIELD OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a land mine counter measure system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Land mines pose a severe threat to military and civilian personnel. The idea of detonating land mines using conventional weapons and ordinances is known but such methods are not very effective or efficient since many ordinances would be required to detonate the numerous possible land mines in a given area. One current idea is to deploy a net carrying shape charges onto the land mine field. But, never is there a guarantee that all the land mines would be detonated and, worse, some shape charges could fail to detonate resulting in an added explosive danger to personnel who then enter onto the land mine field. Also, this approach would not be used during a war where troops are required to engage the enemy from the beach. Also, land mines are often buried 6 inches beneath the sand on a beach and also beneath the sand under two or more feet of water. Conventional approaches fail to effectively counter such tactics during wartime.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a better land mine counter measure system. It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system which is highly effective and which can be used during armed conflict. It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system which is
efficient. It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system which leaves no unexploded ordinances on the land mine field. It is a further object of this invention to provide such a system which can efficiently and effectively detonate land mines buried in the sand and also under the water. The invention results from the realization that a more efficient and effective land mine counter measure system is effected by spraying the land mine field with a number of arrow-like kinetic energy rods each aligned about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface (sand or sand and water) above the mines. This invention features a mine counter measure system comprising a housing, an explosive in the housing, and a plurality of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive. Each rod has a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine. In one example, each rod has a length to diameter ratio of greater than 5 and preferably a length to diameter ratio greater than or equal to 10. In one embodiment,
the stabilizer is a plurality of fins on the distal end of each rod. In another embodiment, the stabilizer is a flared distal end of the rod. Typically, the proximal end of each rod is pointed. In one example, the proximal end of each rod includes a poly-wedge shape to decrease the drag on the rod. Also, it is preferred that the center of gravity of each rod is proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward. Further included may be a foam body in the housing between the rods and the explosive. Or, there may be a foam body in the housing about the rods between the housing and the explosive. In one example, the rods are packaged in coaxially aligned rings and there are coaxially aligned foam bodies between each ring of rods. The rods may have a circular cross sectional shape, a cruciform cross sectional shape, or a tristar cross sectional shape. In one example, the housing is a shell. In another example, the housing is a payload. Further included may be a missile for deploying a plurality of said payloads. Typically, the rods are staggered in the housing for better packaging efficiency. One mine counter measure system in accordance with this invention includes a housing, an explosive in the housing, a plurality of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine, each rod having a length to diameter ratio of greater than or equal to 10, each rod having a poly- wedge shaped proximal end, and foam in the housing between the rods and the explosive core. One mine counter measure system in accordance with this invention features a plurality of munition housings each including, an explosive, and a plurality of kinetic energy rods about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine and each rod
including a poly-wedge shaped tip to decrease the drag on the rod and a length to diameter ratio of greater than or equal to 10. A carrier deploys the munition housings over a minefield. This invention also features a method of destroying mines in a minefield buried under the surface. The method comprises deploying a munition including a plurality of kinetic energy rods each having a stabilizer into a position above the minefield and deploying the rods above the minefield to fall towards the minefield each aligned along a velocity vector to penetrate the surface and destroy the mines. In one example, a plurality of the minefields are carried to a position above the minefield and deploying includes detonating an explosive core in each minefield surrounded by the rods.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which: Fig. 1 is a schematic view showing the deployment of the mine counter measure system of the subject invention; Fig. 2 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a projectile for deploying the munitions of the subject invention; Fig. 3 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a munition in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 4 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one embodiment of a kinetic energy rod in accordance with the subject invention;
Fig. 5 is a schematic view showing the deployment of the kinetic energy rods of Fig. 4 from the munition of Fig. 3 onto a minefield; Fig. 6 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing another embodiment of a kinetic energy rod in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 7 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing a tristar rod configuration in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 8 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing a cruciform rod configuration in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 9 is a schematic partial view showing staggered kinetic energy rods for better packaging efficiency in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 11 is a cross sectional view showing a munition with a number of kinetic energy rods in accordance with the subject invention; Fig. 12 is a drawing which characterizes the lethality of the mine counter measure system of the subject invention; and Fig. 13 is a graph comparing penetrator mass to impact velocity.
DISCLOSURE OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangements of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. Mine counter measure system 10, Fig. 1 includes, in one example, missile 12 deployed from ship or submarine 14 or other launcher. In this specific example,
missile 12 is an XM 982 Excalibur 155 mm long range guided missile with GPS tracking capability and having a trajectory optimized for range and time of arrival at position A and then having a trajectory optimized for rod delivery at position B over minefield 14. Other ordinances and delivery mechanisms, however, are within the scope of this invention. As shown in Fig. 2, missile 12 includes bays 18 housing deployable munitions, shells, or other payloads 20 discussed infra. Missile 12 also includes antijam GPS/IMU navigation section 22, guidance and electronic unit section 24, inductive fuse setter interface 26, control and actuator section 28, and fin stabilizer base section 30. As shown in Fig. 3, each munition or shell 20 includes munition housing 32, explosive core 34, and a number of kinetic energy rods 36 in housing 12 about core 34. Typically, foam body 38 is included between rods 36 and explosive core 34. To align each rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface (e.g., sand and/or water) above a land mine, each rod 36, Fig. 4 includes some kind of stabilizer 40 which, in this example, is a flared end. Preferably, each rod is made of tungsten or tantalum and has a length to diameter ratio of greater than 5 and typically greater than or equal to 10. As shown in Fig. 5, mines 50 are buried beneath sand and/or water and missile 12, Figs. 1-2 has reached deployment position B, Fig. 1 whereupon munitions 20, Figs. 2-3 are deployed and explosive core 34, Fig. 3 detonated which sprays rods 36, Fig. 5 into a desired pattern, each rod aligned along its velocity vector to penetrate the surface above a mine 50 thereby destroying it.
The result is effective and efficient mine distraction without the possibility of leaving unexploded ordinances on the minefield. In Fig. 6, kinetic energy rod 36' includes a stabilizer in the form of fins 60 on the distal end of each rod and the proximal end of rod 36 includes pointed poly-wedge shaped tip 38. This penetrator nose is designed to reduce air drag (CD) allowing the penetrator to fly faster for longer period of time and enhance its over all stability. There has been much work on the design of these nose shapes. See Gonor A.L., Kazakov M.N., Shvets A.I. Aerodynamic characteristics of star-shaped bodies during supersonic speeds, News of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (Izv. AN SSSR). MZHG. 1971, No 1, p. 97-102 incorporated herein by this reference. It is also preferred that the center of gravity of each rod is located proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward upon deployment from housing 12, Fig. 5. The rods may also have a non-circular cross section as shown for rod 36", Fig. 7 (a tristar configuration), and rod 36'", Fig. 8, (a cruciform construction). As shown in Fig. 9, the fins of the rods can be staggered in the munition or shell for better packaging efficiency. In Fig. 10, rods 36 are packaged in coaxially aligned rings A, B, and D with coaxially aligned rings W, X, and Y of foam between each adjacent ring of rods. The explosive used between each ring would typically be a detasheet or a PBX based explosive. In Fig. 11, foam body 38' is about rods 36 between housing 32 and explosive core 34. Also, munition 20 may be a shell launched, for example, from a gun subsystem as opposed to missile 12, Figs. 1-2. Munition 20 would then include a time
delay or altitude fuse for deploying core 34. The munition rounds are fired toward the beach at high velocity. The desired dispersal spray pattern and mine spacing will determine the optimum altitude to deploy the rods. The rods are isotropically deployed creating a uniform spray pattern about the munition center axis. The rods became stabilized shortly after explosive deployment because of the tail fin design. The unique nose shape reduces the penetrator drag ensuring high impact velocity into the mine field. Each rod penetrates the sand or water at high enough velocity to detonate the explosive. Fig. 12 demonstrates the high lethality obtained by the system of this invention based on computer modeling. A generic minefield was generated and each mine was placed three feet apart while each row was five feet apart. A highly dense spray pattern of 30 gm rods with a length to diameter ratio of 10 impacting the minefield nearly kills all of the mines in a 10 foot by 12 foot area. With a 1000 rods and a burst point at a higher altitude, there is a significant increase in the number of mines that were hit with multiple rod impacts. This calculation demonstrates that an extremely large area minefield can be made safe provided that the proper burse point for a given number of projectiles is selected. The system of the subject invention also takes into account the effects of water and sand on penetration. Mines that lie on shore can be covered with up to 6 inches of dry or wet sand while mines in the surf zone can be covered with sand and water up to 2 foot. Fig. 13 shows the design trade-offs between the optimum penetrator concept. If a sphere is used, then it would require a larger mass compared to a slender long rid. A rod is a much more efficient penetrator compared to a sphere. However, the longer
the rod becomes the more precise is most impact with low yaw angles. If the penetrator is not aligned then it will not penetrate well and fail to kill the buried mine. Since all weapons are weight restricted, the lightest weight penetrator is the best for optimum lethality. Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words "including", "comprising", "having", and "with" as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments. For example, selected structures and techniques of co-pending patent applications Nos. 09/938,022; 10/162,498; 10/301,302; 10/301,420; 10/384,804; 10/385,319; and 10/370,892, herein incorporated by this reference, may also be used in the connection with the subject invention. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims: What is claimed is:

Claims

1. A mine counter measure system comprising: a housing; an explosive in the housing; and plurality of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine.
2. The system of claim 1 in which each rod has a length to diameter ratio of greater than 5.
3. The system of claim 2 in which each rod has a length to diameter ratio greater than or equal to 10.
4. The system of claim 1 in which the stabilizer is a plurality of fins on the distal end of each rod.
5. The system of claim 1 in which the stabilizer is a flared distal end of the rod.
6. The system of claim 1 in which the proximal end of each rod is pointed.
7. The system of claim 1 in which the proximal end of each rod includes a poly-wedge shape to decrease the drag on the nose of the rod.
8. The system of claim 1 in which the center of gravity of each rod is proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward.
9. The system of claim 1 further including a foam body in the housing between the rods and the explosive.
10. The system of claim 1 further including a foam body in the housing about the rods between the housing and the explosive.
11. The system of claim 1 in which the rods are packaged in coaxially aligned rings and there are coaxially aligned foam bodies between each ring of rods.
12. The system of claim 1 in which the rods have a circular cross sectional shape.
13. The system of claim 1 in which the rods have a cruciform cross
sectional shape.
14. The system of claim 1 in which the rods have a tristar cross sectional shape.
15. The system of claim 1 in which the housing is a thin shell.
16. The system of claim 11 in which the housing is a payload.
17. The system of claim 16 further including a missile for deploying a plurality of said payloads.
18. The system of claim 1 in which the rods are staggered in the housing for better packaging efficiency.
19. A mine counter measure system comprising: a housing; an explosive in the housing; a plurality of kinetic energy rods in the housing about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine, each rod having a length to diameter ratio of greater than or equal to 10, each rod having a poly-wedge shaped proximal end; and foam in the housing between the rods and the explosive.
20. The system of claim 19 in which the foam is a solid body disposed between the rods and the explosive.
21. The system of claim 19 in which the foam is about the rods between the housing and the explosive.
22. The system of claim 19 in which the rods are packaged in coaxially aligned rings and there are coaxially aligned foam bodies between each ring of rods.
23. The system of claim 19 in which the stabilizer is a plurality of fins on
the distal end of each rod.
24. The system of claim 19 in which the stabilizer is a flared distal end of the rod.
25. The system of claim 19 in which the center of gravity of each rod is proximate the distal end of the rod to orient the proximal end of the rod downward
26. The system of claim 19 in which the rods have a circular cross sectional shape.
27. The system of claim 19 in which the rods have a cruciform cross sectional shape.
28. The system of claim 19 in which the rods have a tristar cross sectional
shape.
29. The system of claim 19 in which the munition is a shell.
30. A mine counter measure system comprising: a plurality of munition housings each including; an explosive; and a plurality of kinetic energy rods about the explosive, each rod having a stabilizer for aligning the rod about its velocity vector to better penetrate the surface above a mine and each rod including a poly-wedge shaped tip to decrease the drag on the rod and a length to diameter ratio of greater than or equal to 10; and a carrier for deploying the munition housings over a minefield.
31. A method of destroying mines in a minefield buried under the surface, the method comprising: deploying a munition including a plurality of kinetic energy rods each having a stabilizer into a position above the minefield; and deploying the rods above the minefield to fall towards the minefield each aligned along a velocity vector to penetrate the surface and destroy the mines.
32. The method of claim 31 in which deploying includes carrying a plurality of said minefields to a position above the minefield.
33. The method of claim 32 in which deploying includes detonating an explosive core in each munition surrounded by the rods.
PCT/US2004/033980 2003-10-14 2004-10-13 Mine counter measure system Ceased WO2005099362A2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006535674A JP2007508524A (en) 2003-10-14 2004-10-13 Mine protection system
CA002541786A CA2541786C (en) 2003-10-14 2004-10-13 Mine counter measure system
EP04821778A EP1737728A4 (en) 2003-10-14 2004-10-13 Mine counter measure system
IL174859A IL174859A (en) 2003-10-14 2006-04-06 Mine countermeasure system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US68524203A 2003-10-14 2003-10-14
US10/685,242 2003-10-14

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005099362A2 true WO2005099362A2 (en) 2005-10-27
WO2005099362A3 WO2005099362A3 (en) 2006-11-30

Family

ID=35150408

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2004/033980 Ceased WO2005099362A2 (en) 2003-10-14 2004-10-13 Mine counter measure system

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7726244B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1737728A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2007508524A (en)
CA (1) CA2541786C (en)
IL (1) IL174859A (en)
WO (1) WO2005099362A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8075591B2 (en) 2004-11-09 2011-12-13 Depuy Spine, Inc. Minimally invasive spinal fixation guide systems and methods
IL214102A (en) * 2011-07-14 2017-02-28 Orlev Nahum Wide area neutralizer
US8904937B2 (en) 2012-04-13 2014-12-09 C-2 Innovations Inc. Line charge
US9816793B2 (en) * 2014-02-11 2017-11-14 Raytheon Company Shock-resistant fuzewell for munition
JP6261374B2 (en) * 2014-02-21 2018-01-17 株式会社Ｉｈｉエアロスペース Underwater penetrator and installation method
US9354025B1 (en) 2014-09-15 2016-05-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Modified tail fin
US10508892B1 (en) * 2016-08-15 2019-12-17 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Distributed fuze architecture for highly reliable submunitions

Family Cites Families (149)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1198035A (en) 1915-12-14 1916-09-12 William Caldwell Huntington Projectile.
US1229421A (en) 1917-03-21 1917-06-12 George E Groves Projectile.
US1235076A (en) 1917-06-02 1917-07-31 Edwin S Stanton Torpedo-guard.
US1244046A (en) 1917-07-20 1917-10-23 Robert Ffrench Projectile.
US1300333A (en) 1918-04-08 1919-04-15 Leroy A Berry Explosive shell.
US1305967A (en) 1918-05-22 1919-06-03 Edward A Hawks Explosive shell.
US2308683A (en) 1938-12-27 1943-01-19 John D Forbes Chain shot
US2322624A (en) 1939-10-06 1943-06-22 John D Forbes Chain shot
US2296980A (en) 1940-10-17 1942-09-29 Oric Scott Hober Shell
GB550001A (en) 1941-07-16 1942-12-17 Lewis Motley Improvements in or relating to ordnance projectiles
US2360696A (en) 1942-02-18 1944-10-17 James D Long Aerial bomb and the method of making the same
US2337765A (en) 1942-12-31 1943-12-28 Nahirney John Bomb
US2457817A (en) 1944-03-31 1949-01-04 Garland L Harrell Bomb
US4147108A (en) * 1955-03-17 1979-04-03 Aai Corporation Warhead
US2925965A (en) 1956-03-07 1960-02-23 Collins Radio Co Guided missile ordnance system
US2988994A (en) 1957-02-21 1961-06-20 Jr Carl W Fleischer Shaped charge with cylindrical liner
US3877376A (en) 1960-07-27 1975-04-15 Us Navy Directed warhead
US3263612A (en) 1961-02-10 1966-08-02 Aerojet General Co Fragmentation type weapon
BE637530A (en) 1962-09-18
US3332348A (en) 1965-01-22 1967-07-25 Jack A Myers Non-lethal method and means for delivering incapacitating agents
US5182418A (en) 1965-06-21 1993-01-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Aimable warhead
US3903804A (en) 1965-09-27 1975-09-09 Us Navy Rocket-propelled cluster weapon
US3757694A (en) 1965-10-22 1973-09-11 Us Navy Fragment core warhead
US3949674A (en) 1965-10-22 1976-04-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Operation of fragment core warhead
US3796159A (en) 1966-02-01 1974-03-12 Us Navy Explosive fisheye lens warhead
GB1171362A (en) 1966-06-30 1969-11-19 Boelkow Gmbh Warhead
US3851590A (en) 1966-12-30 1974-12-03 Aai Corp Multiple hardness pointed finned projectile
US3861314A (en) * 1966-12-30 1975-01-21 Aai Corp Concave-compound pointed finned projectile
US3941059A (en) 1967-01-18 1976-03-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Flechette
US3954060A (en) 1967-08-24 1976-05-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Projectile
US3464356A (en) 1967-12-28 1969-09-02 Us Army Self-stabilizing rod penetrators
US4430941A (en) 1968-05-27 1984-02-14 Fmc Corporation Projectile with supported missiles
US3915092A (en) 1968-06-04 1975-10-28 Aai Corp Underwater projectile
US3846878A (en) 1968-06-04 1974-11-12 Aai Corp Method of making an underwater projectile
US4106410A (en) 1968-08-26 1978-08-15 Martin Marietta Corporation Layered fragmentation device
US3565009A (en) 1969-03-19 1971-02-23 Us Navy Aimed quadrant warhead
US3665009A (en) 1969-08-18 1972-05-23 Du Pont 1-carbamolypyrazole-4-sulfonamides
US3656433A (en) 1969-10-13 1972-04-18 Us Army Method for reducing shot dispersion
US4745864A (en) 1970-12-21 1988-05-24 Ltv Aerospace & Defense Company Explosive fragmentation structure
US3749615A (en) 1971-06-11 1973-07-31 Thiokol Chemical Corp Gun ammunition composed of encapsulated monopropellants
US4026213A (en) 1971-06-17 1977-05-31 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Selectively aimable warhead
US4210082A (en) 1971-07-30 1980-07-01 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Sub projectile or flechette launch system
US4211169A (en) * 1971-07-30 1980-07-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Sub projectile or flechette launch system
US3771455A (en) 1972-06-06 1973-11-13 Us Army Flechette weapon system
US3797359A (en) 1972-08-14 1974-03-19 Me Ass Multi-flechette weapon
US3818833A (en) 1972-08-18 1974-06-25 Fmc Corp Independent multiple head forward firing system
DE2308912C3 (en) 1973-02-23 1981-01-08 Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh, 8000 Muenchen Electric ignition system for the explosive charge of a warhead or the like
US3881416A (en) 1973-04-23 1975-05-06 Us Army Choked flechette weapon system
US3934042A (en) 1973-07-13 1976-01-20 William Patrick De Stoutz Method and apparatus for the irradiative treatment of beverages
US4522356A (en) 1973-11-12 1985-06-11 General Dynamics, Pomona Division Multiple target seeking clustered munition and system
US3902424A (en) 1973-12-07 1975-09-02 Us Army Projectile
US4015527A (en) 1976-03-10 1977-04-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Caseless ammunition round with spin stabilized metal flechette and disintegrating sabot
US4089267A (en) 1976-09-29 1978-05-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army High fragmentation munition
US4036140A (en) 1976-11-02 1977-07-19 The United States Of America As Represented Bythe Secretary Of The Army Ammunition
US4231293A (en) 1977-10-26 1980-11-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Submissile disposal system
DE2835817C2 (en) 1978-08-16 1985-03-21 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf In a cargo floor to several active bodies arranged one behind the other so that they can be ejected, with several daughter floors arranged in radially directed launching tubes
US4172407A (en) 1978-08-25 1979-10-30 General Dynamics Corporation Submunition dispenser system
FR2442428A1 (en) 1978-11-23 1980-06-20 France Etat NEW CINETIC ENERGY PROJECTILE
US4372216A (en) 1979-12-26 1983-02-08 The Boeing Company Dispensing system for use on a carrier missile for rearward ejection of submissiles
DE3004047C2 (en) 1980-02-05 1984-10-31 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf Armor-piercing projectile
US4648323A (en) 1980-03-06 1987-03-10 Northrop Corporation Fragmentation munition
DE3016861C2 (en) 1980-05-02 1984-07-12 Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München Warhead with a shell for fragmentation
US4376901A (en) 1981-06-08 1983-03-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Magnetocumulative generator
FR2678723B1 (en) 1981-06-26 1993-11-12 Etat Francais EXPLOSIVE PROJECTILE, ESPECIALLY ANTI-AIR, INCLUDING A LOAD WITH ROTARY DIRECTIONAL EFFECT.
DE3127002A1 (en) 1981-07-09 1983-01-20 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf BULLET ARRANGEMENT FOR A PIPE ARM
US4455943A (en) 1981-08-21 1984-06-26 The Boeing Company Missile deployment apparatus
DE3209594A1 (en) 1982-03-17 1983-09-29 L'Etat Français représenté par le Délégué Général pour l'Armement, 75997 Paris TARGET-BREAKING RIFLE SHEET, IN PARTICULAR TO FIGHT MULTIPLE-PLATE TARGETS
DE3242591A1 (en) 1982-11-18 1984-05-24 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf LOW-LENGTH / DIAMETER RATIO UNDER-CALIBRATION BULLET STOCK
DE3306659A1 (en) 1983-02-25 1984-08-30 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf ACTION UNIT
DE3327043A1 (en) 1983-07-27 1985-02-07 Technisch-Mathematische Studiengesellschaft mbH, 5300 Bonn Device for scattering electromagnetic decoy material, particularly from a rocket
US4848239A (en) 1984-09-28 1989-07-18 The Boeing Company Antiballistic missile fuze
US4655139A (en) 1984-09-28 1987-04-07 The Boeing Company Selectable deployment mode fragment warhead
US4658727A (en) 1984-09-28 1987-04-21 The Boeing Company Selectable initiation-point fragment warhead
US5431106A (en) 1985-06-05 1995-07-11 Shorts Missile Systems Limited Release of daughter missiles
US4638737A (en) 1985-06-28 1987-01-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Multi-warhead, anti-armor missile
US4750423A (en) 1986-01-31 1988-06-14 Loral Corporation Method and system for dispensing sub-units to achieve a selected target impact pattern
US4676167A (en) 1986-01-31 1987-06-30 Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Spin dispensing method and apparatus
US4686904A (en) 1986-06-02 1987-08-18 Stafford Gilbert A Shell having pyramid shaped shot
US4729321A (en) 1986-06-02 1988-03-08 Stafford Gilbert A Shell having pyramid shaped shot
CA1266202A (en) 1986-06-05 1990-02-27 William J. Robertson Multiple flechette warhead
FR2606135B1 (en) 1986-10-31 1990-07-27 Thomson Brandt Armements PROJECTILE COMPRISING SUB-PROJECTILES WITH CONTROLLED DIRECTIONAL WIDTH
FR2609165A1 (en) 1986-12-31 1988-07-01 Thomson Brandt Armements PROJECTILE COMPRISING SUB-PROJECTILES WITH A PREFINED EFFICIENCY ZONE
FR2609542B1 (en) 1987-01-14 1994-05-06 Serat IMPROVEMENTS TO TANDEM HOLLOW LOAD PROJECTILES
GB8722589D0 (en) 1987-09-25 2000-08-23 Gec Avionics Weapon systems
GB2226624B (en) 1987-12-12 1991-07-03 Thorn Emi Electronics Ltd Projectile
US4922826A (en) 1988-03-02 1990-05-08 Diehl Gmbh & Co. Active component of submunition, as well as flechette warhead and flechettes therefor
US4996923A (en) 1988-04-07 1991-03-05 Olin Corporation Matrix-supported flechette load and method and apparatus for manufacturing the load
DE3830527A1 (en) 1988-09-08 1990-03-22 Diehl Gmbh & Co PROJECT-FORMING INSERT FOR HOLLOW LOADS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE INSERT
DE3843796A1 (en) 1988-12-24 1990-07-05 Rheinmetall Gmbh FLOOR WITH SIDE CONTROL
GB8918267D0 (en) 1989-08-10 1990-04-25 British Aerospace Weapon systems
DE3932952A1 (en) 1989-10-03 1991-04-11 Rheinmetall Gmbh BULLET STOCK
DE3934042A1 (en) 1989-10-12 1991-04-25 Diehl Gmbh & Co Warhead with sub-munitions - has explosive charges to break up housing and to scatter sub-munitions
GB9014653D0 (en) 1989-10-18 1997-11-05 Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm Auswerfen und verteilen von submunition
DE3937762C2 (en) 1989-11-14 1993-11-25 Diehl Gmbh & Co Artillery shell submunition
US5313890A (en) 1991-04-29 1994-05-24 Hughes Missile Systems Company Fragmentation warhead device
US5565647A (en) 1991-05-24 1996-10-15 Giat Industries Warhead with sequential shape charges
USH1047H (en) 1991-08-05 1992-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Fragmenting notched warhead rod
USH1048H (en) 1991-08-05 1992-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Composite fragmenting rod for a warhead case
DE4139372C1 (en) 1991-11-29 1995-03-02 Deutsche Aerospace Fragmentation warhead
US5191169A (en) 1991-12-23 1993-03-02 Olin Corporation Multiple EFP cluster module warhead
US5223667A (en) 1992-01-21 1993-06-29 Bei Electronics, Inc. Plural piece flechettes affording enhanced penetration
US5229542A (en) 1992-03-27 1993-07-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Selectable fragmentation warhead
US5370053A (en) 1993-01-15 1994-12-06 Magnavox Electronic Systems Company Slapper detonator
IL108095A (en) 1993-12-20 1999-05-09 Israel State Chemical system for accelerating projectiles to hypervelocity
DE4409424C1 (en) 1994-03-18 1995-08-10 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Catchment device for flying objects
FR2721701B1 (en) 1994-06-28 1996-08-14 Giat Ind Sa Tail for a projectile, in particular for a sub-calibrated supersonic projectile.
US5817969A (en) 1994-08-26 1998-10-06 Oerlikon Contraves Pyrotec Ag Spin-stabilized projectile with payload
US5524524A (en) 1994-10-24 1996-06-11 Tracor Aerospace, Inc. Integrated spacing and orientation control system
IL115749A (en) 1994-10-27 2000-02-29 Thomson Csf Missile launching and orientating system
US5535679A (en) 1994-12-20 1996-07-16 Loral Vought Systems Corporation Low velocity radial deployment with predetermined pattern
DE4445991A1 (en) 1994-12-22 1996-06-27 Rheinmetall Ind Gmbh Ignition system for propellant charges and method for producing such ignition systems
DE29507361U1 (en) 1995-05-08 1996-09-26 Diehl GmbH & Co, 90478 Nürnberg Submunition
US5691502A (en) 1995-06-05 1997-11-25 Lockheed Martin Vought Systems Corp. Low velocity radial deployment with predeterminded pattern
CA2196977C (en) 1995-06-07 2000-08-22 Jeffrey A. Brown Aerodynamically stabilized projectile system for use against underwater objects
US5542354A (en) 1995-07-20 1996-08-06 Olin Corporation Segmenting warhead projectile
US5821449A (en) 1995-09-28 1998-10-13 Alliant Techsystems Inc. Propellant grain geometry for controlling ullage and increasing flame permeability
SE508652C2 (en) 1995-10-05 1998-10-26 Bofors Ab Ways to distinguish false zone tube indications from indications of real targets as well as explosives filled with zone tube projectile
US5661258A (en) * 1996-01-25 1997-08-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Air-delivered ordnance explosive mine and obstacle clearance method
DE19619341C2 (en) 1996-05-14 1999-11-11 Rheinmetall W & M Gmbh Sub-caliber balancing projectile and method for its production
USD380784S (en) 1996-05-29 1997-07-08 Great Lakes Dart Distributors, Inc. Dart
US6279482B1 (en) 1996-07-25 2001-08-28 Trw Inc. Countermeasure apparatus for deploying interceptor elements from a spin stabilized rocket
US5796031A (en) 1997-02-10 1998-08-18 Primex Technologies, Inc. Foward fin flechette
DE19716512B4 (en) 1997-04-19 2004-04-15 Diehl Stiftung & Co.Kg Fall arrest control gear
US6010580A (en) 1997-09-24 2000-01-04 California Institute Of Technology Composite penetrator
US6279478B1 (en) 1998-03-27 2001-08-28 Hayden N. Ringer Imaging-infrared skewed-cone fuze
US6186070B1 (en) 1998-11-27 2001-02-13 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Combined effects warheads
US6276277B1 (en) 1999-04-22 2001-08-21 Lockheed Martin Corporation Rocket-boosted guided hard target penetrator
US6439127B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2002-08-27 Sandia Corporation Penetrating projectile for bomb disablement
US6308607B1 (en) * 2000-04-03 2001-10-30 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Neutralizing munition
SE518526C2 (en) 2000-07-03 2002-10-22 Bofors Weapon Sys Ab Ammunition unit charging unit
US6367388B1 (en) 2001-01-09 2002-04-09 Chris Lee Billings Ammunition cartridge with differently packed shotshell wad projectile chambers
GB2372235A (en) * 2001-02-16 2002-08-21 Secr Defence Mine neutralisation device
US6779462B2 (en) 2001-06-04 2004-08-24 Raytheon Company Kinetic energy rod warhead with optimal penetrators
US6598534B2 (en) * 2001-06-04 2003-07-29 Raytheon Company Warhead with aligned projectiles
US6910423B2 (en) 2001-08-23 2005-06-28 Raytheon Company Kinetic energy rod warhead with lower deployment angles
US20050109234A1 (en) 2001-08-23 2005-05-26 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead with lower deployment angles
EP1430266B1 (en) 2001-09-22 2006-06-28 RUAG Ammotec GmbH Disintegrating hunting bullet
US6666145B1 (en) 2001-11-16 2003-12-23 Textron Systems Corporation Self extracting submunition
US6540175B1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-04-01 Lockheed Martin Corporation System for clearing buried and surface mines
US6622632B1 (en) 2002-03-01 2003-09-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Polar ejection angle control for fragmenting warheads
US6640723B2 (en) 2002-03-25 2003-11-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Mission responsive ordnance
US6931994B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2005-08-23 Raytheon Company Tandem warhead
US7415917B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2008-08-26 Raytheon Company Fixed deployed net for hit-to-kill vehicle
US7040235B1 (en) 2002-08-29 2006-05-09 Raytheon Company Kinetic energy rod warhead with isotropic firing of the projectiles
US20040055498A1 (en) 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead deployment system
US20060021538A1 (en) 2002-08-29 2006-02-02 Lloyd Richard M Kinetic energy rod warhead deployment system
US7017496B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2006-03-28 Raytheon Company Kinetic energy rod warhead with imploding charge for isotropic firing of the penetrators
US6766745B1 (en) * 2002-10-08 2004-07-27 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Low cost rapid mine clearance system
US6920827B2 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-07-26 Raytheon Company Vehicle-borne system and method for countering an incoming threat

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A.L.GONOR; M.N.KAZAKOV; A.I.SHVETS.: "Aerodynamics characteristics of star-shaped bodies during supe", NEWS OF THE SOVIET ACADEMY OF SCIENCES., no. 1, 1971, pages 97 - 102
See also references of EP1737728A4

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7726244B1 (en) 2010-06-01
JP2007508524A (en) 2007-04-05
CA2541786C (en) 2008-12-30
US20100139517A1 (en) 2010-06-10
WO2005099362A3 (en) 2006-11-30
EP1737728A2 (en) 2007-01-03
EP1737728A4 (en) 2009-07-08
CA2541786A1 (en) 2005-10-27
IL174859A (en) 2012-06-28
IL174859A0 (en) 2008-03-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6598534B2 (en) Warhead with aligned projectiles
CA2496536C (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with imploding charge for isotropic firing of the penetrators
US7726244B1 (en) Mine counter measure system
JPH11501718A (en) 2 operation mode warhead
US6910423B2 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with lower deployment angles
US20040055498A1 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead deployment system
JP2008512642A (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with narrow open angle
IL185241A (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with projectile spacing
KR101541198B1 (en) Warhead for intercepting system
EP1848954B1 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with aiming mechanism
RU2034232C1 (en) Directive fragmentation shell cluster
US20060283348A1 (en) Kinetic energy rod warhead with self-aligning penetrators
KR102033772B1 (en) Munition
JP2021504669A (en) Equipment and Methods for Providing Horizontal Dispersion Patterns
JP2020517904A (en) Projectile with selectable angle of attack
JP2010266172A (en) Guided flying body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2004821778

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2541786

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 174859

Country of ref document: IL

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006535674

Country of ref document: JP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2004821778

Country of ref document: EP