WO2006116818A1 - COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING A VALIDATlON INSTRUCTION MESSAGE - Google Patents

COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING A VALIDATlON INSTRUCTION MESSAGE Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006116818A1
WO2006116818A1 PCT/AU2006/000582 AU2006000582W WO2006116818A1 WO 2006116818 A1 WO2006116818 A1 WO 2006116818A1 AU 2006000582 W AU2006000582 W AU 2006000582W WO 2006116818 A1 WO2006116818 A1 WO 2006116818A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
european patent
computer system
european
computer
interface
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/AU2006/000582
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Justin Ryan Simpson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PCTfiler Holdings Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
PCTfiler Holdings Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2005902200A external-priority patent/AU2005902200A0/en
Priority to KR1020077028099A priority Critical patent/KR101359795B1/en
Priority to JP2008509268A priority patent/JP5022360B2/en
Priority to AU2006243825A priority patent/AU2006243825B2/en
Priority to NZ563051A priority patent/NZ563051A/en
Priority to US11/913,393 priority patent/US20080201334A1/en
Application filed by PCTfiler Holdings Pty Ltd filed Critical PCTfiler Holdings Pty Ltd
Priority to CA 2606459 priority patent/CA2606459A1/en
Priority to EP06721461A priority patent/EP1889221A4/en
Publication of WO2006116818A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006116818A1/en
Priority to IL187031A priority patent/IL187031A0/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Priority to US13/760,661 priority patent/US20130144810A1/en
Priority to IL233547A priority patent/IL233547A0/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0283—Price estimation or determination

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to methods of validating granted European patent applications and, in particular, to a computer implemented system for providing validation instructions to European attorneys in each country.
  • a computer system for distributing a validation instruction message the computer system being adapted to communicate with an interface, a specification database and a plurality of European agent computers, the interface including: a European patent identifier receiver adapted to receive a European patent identifier; and a country selection receiver adapted to receive a country selection, and the specification database being adapted to store a plurality of European patent specifications, wherein, when the computer system receives a European patent identifier and a country selection, the compute system is adapted to: (a) obtain, from the specif cation database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and (b) provide the European patent specification and the validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
  • the computer system is adapted to provide the European patent specification to the European isgent computer by one or more of the following methods: (a) sending, to the European agent computer, an email with a copy of the
  • European patent specification attached; and (b) storing the European patent specification in a remotely-accessible memory and emailing, to the European agent computer, a link enabling access to the stored European patent specification.
  • the computer system stores the European patent specification in the remotely-accessible memory h encrypted form.
  • the validation instruction message is adapted to instruct a European agent associated with the European agent computer to validate a granted European patent corresponding to the European patent identifier with a patent office of a country corresponding to the country selectio ⁇ .
  • the computer system is further adapted to calculate a cost of validating a European patent corresponding to the European Patent identifier.
  • the computer system is adapted to display the cost via the interface.
  • the interface includes a word count receiver adapted to receive a word count corresponding to the number of words in the European patent specification.
  • the cost includes s translation cost and wherein the computer system is further adapted to calculate the translation cost with reference to the word count received via the interface.
  • the computer system is adapted to calculate the cost with reference to a lookup table, the lookup table being adapted to store country-specific information relating to one or more of: (a) agent service fees; (b) government fees; and (C) translation fees.
  • an interface for receiving a European patent validation instruction including one or more of: (3) a European patent identifier; (b) one or more country selections; and (o) instructor information, and the interface including one or more of:
  • the interface when the interface receives a European validation instruction including a European patent identifier and a country selection it is adapted to instruct a computer system to: (a) obtain, from a specification database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and (b) provide the European patent specification and a validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram of a computer system for distributing a validation instruction message according to the invention.
  • FIGS 2a to 2d are successive schematic representations of portions of an interface according to the invention.
  • Figure 1 shows the computer system 1 which is designed to send a validation instruction message 10 to a number of European attorneys 8, asking them to validate a granted European patent.
  • the computer system is designed to communicate with an interface 2, a specification database 3 and a number of European agents 8.
  • the interface 2 may take the form of an internet-accessible website and has a European patent identifier receiver 4 such as a text box.
  • the European patent identifier receiver is designed to receive a European patent identifier 5 such as a European patent number or publication number. This identifier is used to uniquely identify a granted European patent that needs to be validated.
  • the interface 2 also has a country selection receiver 6 which may take many forms including a text box, radio button, drop-down box, check box to name a few.
  • the country selection receiver 6 is designed to receive a country selection 7 indicating the countries in which the user wants to validate their European patent.
  • One form of the interface may look similar to the interface shown in Figures 2a to 2d.
  • the specification database 3 is designed to store a number of European patent specification!; 9.
  • the specification database might take the form of the getthepatent.com database, the Espacenet database, or any other database that stores the published specif ⁇ caii ⁇ ns of granted European patents.
  • the system is set up so that w hen the computer system 1 receives a European patent identifier S and a county selection 7 via the interface 2, the computer system:
  • (b) provides the European patent specification 9 and a validation instruction message 10 Io a particular European agent 11 corresponding to the country selection.
  • European agent 11 the system instructs that European agent to validate the patent in their country. If required, tho validation instruction message also instructs the European agent 11 ' to translate the specification into the language accepted by their local patent office. Alternatively, the decision to translate is assumed by the European agents, based upor whether or not the specification is in a language accepted by their respective local patent offices.
  • the computer system might provide the European patent specification 9 to the European agent 11 by sending an email 14 to the European agent with a copy of the European patent specification attached.
  • the computer system might store the European patent specification in a remotely-accessible memory 15 and might just email a link to the stored European patent specification to the European agent.
  • the computer system stores the European patent specification 15 in the remotely-accessible memory in encrypted form.
  • the remotely accessible memory might take the form of an online document exchange portal such as that found at www.projectlounge.com.
  • Alternative forms of electronically sending the European patent specification to the agent 11 are also envisaged.
  • the preferred embodiment computer system is also able to calculate all of the validation costs, including the attorney fees, the government fees and the translation fees. In this way the client knows all of the costs up front and they can be billed in advance. The attorneys, in tun, can receive their payment quicker.
  • the interface 2 includes a word count receiver 12 such as a text box, adapted to receive a word count 16 corresponding to the number of words in the European patent specification.
  • the computer system calculates the validation cost with reference to a lookup table13.
  • the lookup table stores country-specific information itemising the costsi of:
  • the translation costs are calculated by multiplying the word count 16 by the per-word translation rate stored In the lookup table 13.
  • a word count can be initiated automatically by the system, either by counting the words if the specification is in a text format, or by performing OCR (optical character recognition) on the
  • the agents' fees and government fess are added on a per-country basis to reach a total validation cost 17.
  • the computer system displays the cost on the interface.
  • the computer system is linked to a payment processing system to allow the client to pay the total validation cost straight away,
  • the system allocates proportions of the fees to each of the European agents 8 and pays them those proportions in an automated manner.
  • the above system is designed to cut down the paper handling and attorney cost associated with current Europisan patent validation systems. It also allows for up- front calculation and billing of costs, making life easier for both clients and patent agents.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
  • Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)

Abstract

A computer-implemented system for providing validation instructions to European attorneys. The computer system is designed to send a validation instruction message to a number of European attorneys, asking them to validate a granted European patent. The computer system is designed to communicate with an interface, a specification database and a number of European agents. The system is set up so that when the computer system receives a European patent identifier and a country selection via the interface, the computer system: (a) obtains, from the specification database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and (b) provides the European patent specification and a validation instruction message to a particular European agent corresponding to the country selection. The system is further adapted to calculate and bill the total validation cost up-front.

Description

TITLE; COMPUTt=R SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING A VAUDATlON INSTRUCTION MESSAGE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to methods of validating granted European patent applications and, in particular, to a computer implemented system for providing validation instructions to European attorneys in each country.
PRlORART
Current methods of validating European patents will be known to those skilled in the art and involve a lot of manual handling of papers between clients and their European agents. One disadvantage of current methods is that as each attorney in the chain handles a file, they charge the client additional fees, thereby increasing validation costs. Another disadvantage of known methods is that the actual cost of the validation process is not disclosed to the client In advance and clients are often surprised by the high costs wren the invoices finally arrive. A further disadvantage of known methods is that because the actual costs are not calculated up-front patent agents cannot bill their fees until the validation process is complete. They then have to wait for the client to pay their bills, which often takes some months.
THE INVENTION
According to a first aspect of tie present invention there is disclosed a computer system for distributing a validation instruction message, the computer system being adapted to communicate with an interface, a specification database and a plurality of European agent computers, the interface including: a European patent identifier receiver adapted to receive a European patent identifier; and a country selection receiver adapted to receive a country selection, and the specification database being adapted to store a plurality of European patent specifications, wherein, when the computer system receives a European patent identifier and a country selection, the compute system is adapted to: (a) obtain, from the specif cation database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and (b) provide the European patent specification and the validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
Preferably, the computer system is adapted to provide the European patent specification to the European isgent computer by one or more of the following methods: (a) sending, to the European agent computer, an email with a copy of the
European patent specification attached; and (b) storing the European patent specification in a remotely-accessible memory and emailing, to the European agent computer, a link enabling access to the stored European patent specification.
Preferably, the computer system stores the European patent specification in the remotely-accessible memory h encrypted form.
Preferably, the validation instruction message is adapted to instruct a European agent associated with the European agent computer to validate a granted European patent corresponding to the European patent identifier with a patent office of a country corresponding to the country selectioπ.
Preferably, the computer system is further adapted to calculate a cost of validating a European patent corresponding to the European Patent identifier.
Preferably, the computer system is adapted to display the cost via the interface.
Preferably, the interface includes a word count receiver adapted to receive a word count corresponding to the number of words in the European patent specification.
Preferably, the cost includes s translation cost and wherein the computer system is further adapted to calculate the translation cost with reference to the word count received via the interface.
Preferably, the computer system is adapted to calculate the cost with reference to a lookup table, the lookup table being adapted to store country-specific information relating to one or more of: (a) agent service fees; (b) government fees; and (C) translation fees.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is disclosed an interface for receiving a European patent validation instruction, the European patent validation instruction including one or more of: (3) a European patent identifier; (b) one or more country selections; and (o) instructor information, and the interface including one or more of:
(a) a European patent identifier receiver adapted to receive the European patent identifier;
(b) a country selector adapted to receive the one or more country selections; and
(c) an instructor information receiver adapted to receive the instructor information.
Preferably, when the interface receives a European validation instruction including a European patent identifier and a country selection it is adapted to instruct a computer system to: (a) obtain, from a specification database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and (b) provide the European patent specification and a validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The preferred embodiments will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompεmying drawings in which: Figure 1 is a block diagram of a computer system for distributing a validation instruction message according to the invention; and
Figures 2a to 2d are successive schematic representations of portions of an interface according to the invention.
Figure 1 shows the computer system 1 which is designed to send a validation instruction message 10 to a number of European attorneys 8, asking them to validate a granted European patent. The computer system is designed to communicate with an interface 2, a specification database 3 and a number of European agents 8.
The interface 2 may take the form of an internet-accessible website and has a European patent identifier receiver 4 such as a text box. The European patent identifier receiver is designed to receive a European patent identifier 5 such as a European patent number or publication number. This identifier is used to uniquely identify a granted European patent that needs to be validated.
The interface 2, also has a country selection receiver 6 which may take many forms including a text box, radio button, drop-down box, check box to name a few. The country selection receiver 6 is designed to receive a country selection 7 indicating the countries in which the user wants to validate their European patent.
One form of the interface may look similar to the interface shown in Figures 2a to 2d.
Returning to Figure 1 , the specification database 3 is designed to store a number of European patent specification!; 9. The specification database might take the form of the getthepatent.com database, the Espacenet database, or any other database that stores the published specifϊcaiiøns of granted European patents.
The system is set up so that w hen the computer system 1 receives a European patent identifier S and a county selection 7 via the interface 2, the computer system:
(a) obtains, from the specification database 3, a European patent specification 9 corresponding to the European patent identifier; and
(b) provides the European patent specification 9 and a validation instruction message 10 Io a particular European agent 11 corresponding to the country selection.
By sending the specification 9 and the validation instruction massage 10 to the
European agent 11 , the system instructs that European agent to validate the patent in their country. If required, tho validation instruction message also instructs the European agent 11 'to translate the specification into the language accepted by their local patent office. Alternatively, the decision to translate is assumed by the European agents, based upor whether or not the specification is in a language accepted by their respective local patent offices. The computer system might provide the European patent specification 9 to the European agent 11 by sending an email 14 to the European agent with a copy of the European patent specification attached. Alternatively, the computer system might store the European patent specification in a remotely-accessible memory 15 and might just email a link to the stored European patent specification to the European agent. In one form, the computer system stores the European patent specification 15 in the remotely-accessible memory in encrypted form. The remotely accessible memory might take the form of an online document exchange portal such as that found at www.projectlounge.com. Alternative forms of electronically sending the European patent specification to the agent 11 are also envisaged.
Of course, when we say that an email is sent to the European agent, what really happens is that an email is sent to a computer system controlled by the European agent, which the European agent can read and act upon.
The preferred embodiment computer system is also able to calculate all of the validation costs, including the attorney fees, the government fees and the translation fees. In this way the client knows all of the costs up front and they can be billed in advance. The attorneys, in tun, can receive their payment quicker.
One of the important factors in European validation ia the translation cost, in order to accurately calculate this cost, the number of words in the specification needs to be known. For this reason, the interface 2 includes a word count receiver 12 such as a text box, adapted to receive a word count 16 corresponding to the number of words in the European patent specification. The computer system calculates the validation cost with reference to a lookup table13. The lookup table stores country-specific information itemising the costsi of:
(a) agent service fees;
(b) government fees; and (c ) translation fees.
The translation costs are calculated by multiplying the word count 16 by the per-word translation rate stored In the lookup table 13. Alternatively, a word count can be initiated automatically by the system, either by counting the words if the specification is in a text format, or by performing OCR (optical character recognition) on the
Specification if it is provided in an image form. Obviously, since it is only the number of words being counted, the quality of the OCR process is not critical, so long as word gaps are distinguished accurately,
The agents' fees and government fess are added on a per-country basis to reach a total validation cost 17.
Once the cost has been calculated, the computer system displays the cost on the interface. In a preferred embodiment, the computer system is linked to a payment processing system to allow the client to pay the total validation cost straight away, In a preferred form, the system allocates proportions of the fees to each of the European agents 8 and pays them those proportions in an automated manner.
The above system is designed to cut down the paper handling and attorney cost associated with current Europisan patent validation systems. It also allows for up- front calculation and billing of costs, making life easier for both clients and patent agents.
Although the invention has been described with reference to specific examples, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention may be embodied in many other forms .

Claims

Claims:
1. A computer system for distributing a validation instruction message, the computer system being adapted to communicate with an interface, a specification database and a plurality of Eumpean agent computers, the interface including: a European patent identifier receiver adapted to receive a European patent identifier; and a country selection receiver adapted to receive a country selection, and the specification database being adapted to store a plurality of European patent specifications, wherein, when the computer system receives a European patent identifier and a country selection, the computer system is adapted to:
(a) obtain, from the specification database, a European patent specification corresponding to the European patent identifier; and
(b) provide the European patent specification and the validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
2. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the computer system is adapted to provide the European patent specification to the European agent computer by one or more of the following methods: (a) sending, to the European agent computer, an email with a copy of the
European patent specification attached; and (b) storing the European patent specification in a remotely-accessible memory and emailing, to the European agent computer, a link enabling access to the stored European pater t specification.
3. The computer system of claim 2 wherein the computer system stores the European patent specification in the remotely-accessible memory in encrypted form.
4. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the validation instruction message is adapted to instruct a European agent associated with the European agent computer to validate a granted European patent corresponding to the
European patent identifier with a patent office of a country corresponding to the country selection.
5. The computer system of claim 1 wherein the computer system is further
. adapted to calculate a cost of validating a European patent corresponding to the European Patent identifier,
6. The computer system of claim 5 wherein the computer system is adapted to display the cost via the interface.
7. The computer system of claim 5 wherein the interface includes a word count receiver adapted to receive a word count corresponding to the number of words in the European patent specification.
8. The computer system of claim 7 wherein the cost includes a translation cost and wherein the computer system is further adapted to calculate the translation cost with reference to the word count received via the interface.
9. The computer system of claim 5 wherein the computer system is adapted to calculate the cost with reference to a lookup table, the lookup table being adapted to store county-specific information relating to one or more of: {a) agent service fees; (b) government fees; and (C) translation fees.
10. An interface for receiving a European patent validation instruction, the European patent validation instruction including one or more of:
(a) a European patent identifier;
(b) one or more country selections; and
(c) instructor information, and the interface including one or more of: (a) a European patent identifier receiver adapted to receive the European patent identifier;
(b) a country selector adapted to receive the one or more country selections; and
(c) an instructor informaticn receiver adapted to receive the instructor information.
11. The interface of claim 10 wherein when the interface receives a European validation instruction induding a European patent identifier and a country selection it is adapted to instruct a computer system to:
(a) obtain, from a specification database, a European patent specification corresponding to the E uropean patent identifier; and
(b) provide the European patent specification and a validation instruction message to a European agent computer corresponding to the country selection.
12. A computer program comprising program instructions which, when loaded into a computer, constitute the computer system of any one of claims 1 to 9.
13 A computer program comprising program instructions which, when loaded into a computer, constitute the interface of claim 10 or claim 11.
14. A computer program according to claim 12 or claim 13 embodied on a record medium.
15. A computer program aixording to claim 12 or claim 13 stored in a computer memory.
16 A computer program aixording to claim 12 or claim 13 embodied in a readonly memory.
17. A computer program according to claim 12 or claim 13 earned on an electrical carrier signal.
18. A computer system substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
19. An interface substantially as hereinbefore described with reference to the . accompanying drawings.
PCT/AU2006/000582 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING A VALIDATlON INSTRUCTION MESSAGE Ceased WO2006116818A1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06721461A EP1889221A4 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING A VALIDATION INSTRUCTION MESSAGE
JP2008509268A JP5022360B2 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Computer system for distributing validation instruction messages
AU2006243825A AU2006243825B2 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Computer system for distributing a validatlon instruction message
NZ563051A NZ563051A (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Delivering a patent specification using a patent identifier and country selection
US11/913,393 US20080201334A1 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Computer System for Distributing a Validation Instruction Message
KR1020077028099A KR101359795B1 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
CA 2606459 CA2606459A1 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
IL187031A IL187031A0 (en) 2005-05-03 2007-10-30 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
US13/760,661 US20130144810A1 (en) 2005-05-03 2013-02-06 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
IL233547A IL233547A0 (en) 2005-05-03 2014-07-08 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2005902200 2005-05-03
AU2005902200A AU2005902200A0 (en) 2005-05-03 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/760,661 Continuation US20130144810A1 (en) 2005-05-03 2013-02-06 Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006116818A1 true WO2006116818A1 (en) 2006-11-09

Family

ID=37307535

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2006/000582 Ceased WO2006116818A1 (en) 2005-05-03 2006-05-02 COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR DISTRIBUTING A VALIDATlON INSTRUCTION MESSAGE

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US20080201334A1 (en)
EP (2) EP1889221A4 (en)
JP (2) JP5022360B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101359795B1 (en)
CN (2) CN101171606A (en)
AU (2) AU2006243825B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2606459A1 (en)
IL (2) IL187031A0 (en)
NZ (1) NZ563051A (en)
WO (1) WO2006116818A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA200709328B (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010025508A1 (en) * 2008-09-03 2010-03-11 Fgh Ip Pty Ltd Processing a request for an ip right
WO2016151333A1 (en) * 2015-03-25 2016-09-29 Rws Translations Ltd Computer system for calculating translation costs
US10380707B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2019-08-13 Itip Development, Llc Patent life cycle management system

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8910110B2 (en) * 2008-03-19 2014-12-09 Oracle International Corporation Application translation cost estimator
CN103189865B (en) * 2010-09-16 2017-04-12 因诺维亚控股有限公司 Computer system for calculating country-specific fees
EP2740052A4 (en) * 2011-08-05 2015-04-08 Blackberry Ltd System and method for searching for text and displaying found text in augmented reality
US9223769B2 (en) 2011-09-21 2015-12-29 Roman Tsibulevskiy Data processing systems, devices, and methods for content analysis
JP6180035B2 (en) * 2011-10-26 2017-08-16 イノヴィア ホールディングス プロプライエタリー リミテッドＩｎｏｖｉａ Ｈｏｌｄｉｎｇｓ Ｐｔｙ Ｌｔｄ Computer system for instructing application for intellectual property (IP)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002037344A1 (en) * 2000-10-23 2002-05-10 Pctfiler Holdings Pty Ltd System and method of attracting and lodging pct national phase applications
DE10123143A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-11-07 Volker Spitz Generation of the status of patents and trademarks in different countries represented on maps
US20040039582A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2004-02-26 Dave Raj S. Method for securing patent protection in developed countries by inventors in developing countries
US20040054611A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Franks Robert Benjamin Apparatus and method for automated transacting of annuities

Family Cites Families (83)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5175681A (en) * 1985-12-27 1992-12-29 Sony Corporation Computerized system for managing preparation and prosecution of applications in various countries for protection of industrial property rights
US5864818A (en) * 1993-01-04 1999-01-26 Feldman; Ron Automated hotel reservation processing method and system
US5623679A (en) * 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. System and method for creating and manipulating notes each containing multiple sub-notes, and linking the sub-notes to portions of data objects
US6963920B1 (en) * 1993-11-19 2005-11-08 Rose Blush Software Llc Intellectual asset protocol for defining data exchange rules and formats for universal intellectual asset documents, and systems, methods, and computer program products related to same
US5623681A (en) * 1993-11-19 1997-04-22 Waverley Holdings, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronizing, displaying and manipulating text and image documents
US5745745A (en) * 1994-06-29 1998-04-28 Hitachi, Ltd. Text search method and apparatus for structured documents
US6298327B1 (en) * 1995-03-08 2001-10-02 Yes Technologies Expert support system for authoring invention disclosures
US5982931A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-11-09 Ishimaru; Mikio Apparatus and method for the manipulation of image containing documents
US5754840A (en) * 1996-01-23 1998-05-19 Smartpatents, Inc. System, method, and computer program product for developing and maintaining documents which includes analyzing a patent application with regards to the specification and claims
JP3160201B2 (en) * 1996-03-25 2001-04-25 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレ−ション Information retrieval method and information retrieval device
US5987464A (en) * 1996-07-26 1999-11-16 Schneider; Eric Method and system for periodically updating data records having an expiry time
US6049811A (en) * 1996-11-26 2000-04-11 Petruzzi; James D. Machine for drafting a patent application and process for doing same
US6012087A (en) * 1997-01-14 2000-01-04 Netmind Technologies, Inc. Unique-change detection of dynamic web pages using history tables of signatures
US20040107153A1 (en) * 1997-07-22 2004-06-03 Patent And Trademark Fee Management, Llc Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system
US6363361B1 (en) * 1997-07-22 2002-03-26 Patent & Trademark Fee Management, Llc Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system for law firms
US20040039668A1 (en) * 1997-07-22 2004-02-26 Patent And Trademark Fee Management, Llc Computerized patent and trademark fee payment method and system
US20080010365A1 (en) * 1997-07-25 2008-01-10 Eric Schneider Methods, products, systems, and devices for processing reusable information
US6442549B1 (en) * 1997-07-25 2002-08-27 Eric Schneider Method, product, and apparatus for processing reusable information
US6018714A (en) * 1997-11-08 2000-01-25 Ip Value, Llc Method of protecting against a change in value of intellectual property, and product providing such protection
US20020194084A1 (en) * 1997-11-14 2002-12-19 Anita Surles Method and use of point-of sale terminal, which receives, transmits, stores, authorizes, reconciles, and calculates transactions electronically
US6180139B1 (en) * 1998-12-04 2001-01-30 Viva America Marketing, Inc. Composition and method for treating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
US8095581B2 (en) * 1999-02-05 2012-01-10 Gregory A Stobbs Computer-implemented patent portfolio analysis method and apparatus
US7676375B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2010-03-09 Stockpricepredictor.Com, Llc System and method for valuing patents
US7584250B1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2009-09-01 Lockheed Martin Corp. Method and system for distributing an invention disclosure over an intranet
US7171348B2 (en) * 1999-09-10 2007-01-30 Worldlingo.Com Pty Ltd Communication processing system
US6556992B1 (en) * 1999-09-14 2003-04-29 Patent Ratings, Llc Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets
US20090307577A1 (en) * 2001-08-28 2009-12-10 Lee Eugene M System for providing a binding cost for foreign filing a patent application
US20020138297A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Lee Eugene M. Apparatus for and method of analyzing intellectual property information
US7016851B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2006-03-21 Eugene M. Lee Systems and methods for preparation of an intellectual property filing in accordance with jurisdiction- and/or agent specific requirements
US7016852B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2006-03-21 Eugene M. Lee Fee transaction system and method for intellectual property acquisition and/or maintenance
US6665656B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2003-12-16 Motorola, Inc. Method and apparatus for evaluating documents with correlating information
US7941468B2 (en) * 1999-12-30 2011-05-10 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Infringer finder
EP1115076A1 (en) * 2000-01-06 2001-07-11 Venner, Alan J. A reminder and actioning system
US20020032659A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2002-03-14 Michael Waters System and method for obtaining and developing technology for market
US20010027452A1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2001-10-04 Tropper Matthew Bruce System and method to identify documents in a database which relate to a given document by using recursive searching and no keywords
US7292994B2 (en) * 2000-02-15 2007-11-06 Mikos, Ltd. System and method for establishing value and financing of intellectual property
US20010034669A1 (en) * 2000-02-22 2001-10-25 Tropper Matthew Bruce System and method for permitting a potential purchaser to review at least part of the subject matter of a document without being informed of the document's source
US20010049707A1 (en) * 2000-02-29 2001-12-06 Tran Bao Q. Systems and methods for generating intellectual property
JP4713707B2 (en) * 2000-03-28 2011-06-29 日産自動車株式会社 Data display system
US7111076B2 (en) * 2000-04-13 2006-09-19 Intel Corporation System using transform template and XML document type definition for transforming message and its reply
JP2001306885A (en) * 2000-04-21 2001-11-02 Honyaku Center:Kk Translation work support device and translation work support system
KR20030007542A (en) * 2000-04-21 2003-01-23 히로시 오카와 Foreign application supporting system, foreign application supporting method, foreign application supporting program, computer-readable recorded medium on which foreign application supporting program is recorded, foreign application supporting computer, and computer-readable/writable stroage medium
US7069592B2 (en) * 2000-04-26 2006-06-27 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Web-based document system
US6879990B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2005-04-12 Institute For Scientific Information, Inc. System for identifying potential licensees of a source patent portfolio
JP2001344533A (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-14 Tamaoka Sangyo Kk International mediation system for right related to intellectual property
US20020038233A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-03-28 Dmitry Shubov System and method for matching professional service providers with consumers
US20020035571A1 (en) * 2000-09-15 2002-03-21 Coult John H Digital patent marking method
WO2002029668A1 (en) * 2000-09-30 2002-04-11 Terrence Sick Method for searching financial securities and relevant intellectual property
AU2003244578B2 (en) * 2000-10-23 2006-06-22 Pctfiler Holdings Pty Ltd System and method of attracting and lodging PCT national phase applications (II)
US6409811B1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-06-25 Elementis Specialties, Inc. Anti-abrasion ink additives containing reduced amounts of polytetrafluoroethylene and inks containing such additives
AU2002227040A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-06-03 First To File, Inc. Computer implemented method for controlling document edits
US20020093528A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-07-18 First To File, Inc. User interface for managing intellectual property
US20020111824A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-08-15 First To File, Inc. Method of defining workflow rules for managing intellectual property
US20020065675A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-05-30 Grainger Jeffry J. Computer implemented method of managing information disclosure statements
US20020091542A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-07-11 First To File, Inc Computer implemented method of paying intellectual property annuity and maintenance fees
US20020161733A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-10-31 First To File, Inc. Method of creating electronic prosecution experience for patent applicant
US20020116363A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-08-22 First To File, Inc. Method of deleting unnecessary information from a database
US7076439B1 (en) * 2001-01-10 2006-07-11 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for managing multiple projects
US6973441B1 (en) * 2001-01-10 2005-12-06 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for managing accounts payable
US8484177B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2013-07-09 Eugene M. Lee Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing a field-of-search
US6662178B2 (en) * 2001-03-21 2003-12-09 Knowledge Management Objects, Llc Apparatus for and method of searching and organizing intellectual property information utilizing an IP thesaurus
US20020184234A1 (en) * 2001-06-01 2002-12-05 Lundberg Steven W. Internet-based patent and trademark applicaton management system
US20020184130A1 (en) * 2001-04-04 2002-12-05 Blasko John P. Intellectual capital risk analysis system
US20020169743A1 (en) * 2001-05-08 2002-11-14 David Arnold Web-based method and system for identifying and searching patents
US20030033295A1 (en) * 2001-07-11 2003-02-13 Adler Marc Stephen Method for analyzing and recording innovations
US9460414B2 (en) * 2001-08-28 2016-10-04 Eugene M. Lee Computer assisted and/or implemented process and system for annotating and/or linking documents and data, optionally in an intellectual property management system
US7885987B1 (en) * 2001-08-28 2011-02-08 Lee Eugene M Computer-implemented method and system for managing attributes of intellectual property documents, optionally including organization thereof
US20030074351A1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-04-17 Van Stegeren Eric D.F.D. System and method for generating a work set of patents or other documents
US20030172020A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2003-09-11 Davies Nigel Paul Integrated intellectual asset management system and method
US20030101073A1 (en) * 2001-11-26 2003-05-29 Vock Curtis A. System and methods for strengthening and commercializing intellectual property
US7792728B2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2010-09-07 Poltorak Alexander I Method and apparatus for patent valuation
US20040044688A1 (en) * 2002-08-30 2004-03-04 Brudz John Jason Patent asset management systems and methods
US20040199400A1 (en) * 2002-12-17 2004-10-07 Lundberg Steven W. Internet-based patent and trademark application management system
US7783614B2 (en) * 2003-02-13 2010-08-24 Microsoft Corporation Linking elements of a document to corresponding fields, queries and/or procedures in a database
US20040249739A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2004-12-09 Axford Laurie A. Systems and methods for patent portfolio managemnt and expense forecasting
US7606757B1 (en) * 2003-08-11 2009-10-20 Poltorak Alexander I Method and system for patent valuation
GB0320419D0 (en) * 2003-08-30 2003-10-01 Roberts Timothy W Business method
US20080021798A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2008-01-24 Bayer Business Services Gmbh Method For Providing Any Type Of Storage Media Containing Prerecorded Structured Information
US20050216828A1 (en) * 2004-03-26 2005-09-29 Brindisi Thomas J Patent annotator
US20050228684A1 (en) * 2004-04-13 2005-10-13 Pavel Pogodin Integrated computerized system and method for management of intellectual property
US20060230113A1 (en) * 2005-03-21 2006-10-12 Lundberg Steven W System and method for billing in a professional services information management system
US20070022096A1 (en) * 2005-07-22 2007-01-25 Poogee Software Ltd. Method and system for searching a plurality of web sites
US20070239475A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-10-11 Stephan Krieger Method of filing a highly repetitive or a jumbo patent application and preparing a patent application

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002037344A1 (en) * 2000-10-23 2002-05-10 Pctfiler Holdings Pty Ltd System and method of attracting and lodging pct national phase applications
DE10123143A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-11-07 Volker Spitz Generation of the status of patents and trademarks in different countries represented on maps
US20040039582A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2004-02-26 Dave Raj S. Method for securing patent protection in developed countries by inventors in developing countries
US20040054611A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2004-03-18 Franks Robert Benjamin Apparatus and method for automated transacting of annuities

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP1889221A4 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2010025508A1 (en) * 2008-09-03 2010-03-11 Fgh Ip Pty Ltd Processing a request for an ip right
US10380707B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2019-08-13 Itip Development, Llc Patent life cycle management system
US11037259B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2021-06-15 Itip Development, Llc Patent life cycle management system
WO2016151333A1 (en) * 2015-03-25 2016-09-29 Rws Translations Ltd Computer system for calculating translation costs
CN107430737A (en) * 2015-03-25 2017-12-01 如文思翻译有限公司 For calculating the computer system of translation cost

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN101171606A (en) 2008-04-30
AU2009200899A1 (en) 2009-03-26
EP1889221A4 (en) 2010-03-31
EP2642438A1 (en) 2013-09-25
CN102708480A (en) 2012-10-03
KR20080012929A (en) 2008-02-12
IL233547A0 (en) 2014-08-31
CA2606459A1 (en) 2006-11-09
IL187031A0 (en) 2008-11-03
KR101359795B1 (en) 2014-02-07
JP5022360B2 (en) 2012-09-12
AU2006243825B2 (en) 2009-03-26
JP2008541209A (en) 2008-11-20
EP1889221A1 (en) 2008-02-20
US20130144810A1 (en) 2013-06-06
NZ563051A (en) 2011-01-28
AU2006243825A1 (en) 2006-11-09
US20080201334A1 (en) 2008-08-21
JP2012053908A (en) 2012-03-15
ZA200709328B (en) 2008-11-26
AU2009200899B2 (en) 2011-11-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20130144810A1 (en) Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
JP7246788B2 (en) Computer-implemented multi-currency invoice acquisition, trading, access and payment system
US20070235518A1 (en) Electronic image cash letter monitoring
US20020133470A1 (en) Material ordering and reporting expediter (MORE)
US20070095888A1 (en) Electronic image cash letter balancing
JP4898873B2 (en) Foreign remittance auto process management method and program
CN111178029B (en) General invoice template setting method and system
US20020188569A1 (en) Method of and apparatus for intermediating transportation, and computer product
JP2004252675A (en) Expense settlement method and system
AU2013200659A1 (en) Computer system for distributing a validation instruction message
JP2008210286A (en) Product exchange program, product exchange method, product exchange device
JP2005084986A (en) Method and system for providing comment service
WO2010135842A1 (en) System and method for invoice routing
JP5458360B2 (en) Information processing system
JP2005107789A (en) Reservation processing rationalization system for receivables using FB
CA2382988A1 (en) A system for competitive pricing procurement of customized goods and services
JP2024149345A (en) PROGRAM, COMPUTER AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD
JP6220562B2 (en) Delivery material management system, delivery material management method, and delivery material management program
KR20220075508A (en) One-stop newspaper announcement service provision system using platform
KR20140128164A (en) The Method and System for the Electronic guarantee of payment for international trade

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200680014807.4

Country of ref document: CN

Ref document number: 2606459

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2008509268

Country of ref document: JP

Ref document number: 187031

Country of ref document: IL

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 563051

Country of ref document: NZ

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 11913393

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006721461

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006243825

Country of ref document: AU

Ref document number: 9177/DELNP/2007

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020077028099

Country of ref document: KR

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: RU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2006243825

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20060502

Kind code of ref document: A

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2006243825

Country of ref document: AU

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2006721461

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 233547

Country of ref document: IL