WO2010093857A1 - Laser parameter adjustment - Google Patents

Laser parameter adjustment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010093857A1
WO2010093857A1 PCT/US2010/024006 US2010024006W WO2010093857A1 WO 2010093857 A1 WO2010093857 A1 WO 2010093857A1 US 2010024006 W US2010024006 W US 2010024006W WO 2010093857 A1 WO2010093857 A1 WO 2010093857A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
laser
component
different
product
power
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2010/024006
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Faycal Benayad-Cherif
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Videojet Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Videojet Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Videojet Technologies Inc filed Critical Videojet Technologies Inc
Priority to EP10741760.2A priority Critical patent/EP2396138A4/en
Priority to US13/147,608 priority patent/US20110293907A1/en
Priority to CN2010800078947A priority patent/CN102317028A/en
Publication of WO2010093857A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010093857A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/03Observing, e.g. monitoring, the workpiece
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/36Removing material
    • B23K26/361Removing material for deburring or mechanical trimming
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/36Removing material
    • B23K26/40Removing material taking account of the properties of the material involved
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2101/00Articles made by soldering, welding or cutting
    • B23K2101/34Coated articles ; Surface treated articles
    • B23K2101/35Surface treated articles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B44DECORATIVE ARTS
    • B44CPRODUCING DECORATIVE EFFECTS; MOSAICS; TARSIA WORK; PAPERHANGING
    • B44C1/00Processes, not specifically provided for elsewhere, for producing decorative surface effects
    • B44C1/22Removing surface-material, e.g. by engraving, by etching
    • B44C1/228Removing surface-material, e.g. by engraving, by etching by laser radiation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B44DECORATIVE ARTS
    • B44CPRODUCING DECORATIVE EFFECTS; MOSAICS; TARSIA WORK; PAPERHANGING
    • B44C3/00Processes, not specifically provided for elsewhere, for producing ornamental structures
    • B44C3/005Removing selectively parts of at least the upper layer of a multi-layer article
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24802Discontinuous or differential coating, impregnation or bond [e.g., artwork, printing, retouched photograph, etc.]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/24Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24802Discontinuous or differential coating, impregnation or bond [e.g., artwork, printing, retouched photograph, etc.]
    • Y10T428/24917Discontinuous or differential coating, impregnation or bond [e.g., artwork, printing, retouched photograph, etc.] including metal layer

Definitions

  • the product may then be installed as part of a larger device such as a handheld, vehicular or other electronic device.
  • a larger device such as a handheld, vehicular or other electronic device.
  • light installed in a dashboard with a series of one or more buttons or other indicators in front of the light would shine through different images on the buttons, thereby providing a visual indicator as to the function of the button.
  • one or more of these buttons may be installed on an electronic device such as a computer or telephone, or any other device where it might be desirable to light a visual image.
  • a method for removing a substrate from a component with a laser includes providing a component including a substrate.
  • the component is subjected to a laser at a plurality of different locations with a plurality of different power levels or different laser speed levels to remove a portion of the substrate from the component and thereby yield a number of markings on the component.
  • the characteristics of the plurality of different markings are measured, thereby generating a collection of data associated with different power or speed levels for the laser.
  • a relationship is created to represent the characteristics of the laser over different power or speed levels.
  • At least one operating parameter of the laser is adjusted based on the curve representing the characteristics of the laser.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the scale of a particular graphic as a function of power.
  • FIG. 2 shows exemplary products marked using different laser settings so to create test objects used to generate data representative of a laser's substrate removal characteristics
  • the present disclosure provides a method of calibrating a laser for removing a substrate from a component with a laser.
  • the invention relates to a technique that allows an operator to ensure that the dimensions of the area from which substrate material is removed with the laser falls within desired parameters or tolerances. For instance, where the technology is applied to a product including an image on a button, certain aspects of the inventive technique may be used to ensure the image has the desired scale. This can be achieved with a relatively high degree of precision. From a manufacturing perspective, a laser used for etching will degrade over time, though not necessarily at a constant rate. Aside from laser degradation, other variables that may have an affect on the overall effective laser power, as measured by the amount of substrate effectively removed with the laser, include environmental temperature and humidity.
  • the speed at which the laser moves can be adjusted as the speed at which the laser moves affects the scale of the image being produced. If the laser moves too quickly, too little substrate material (paint or otherwise) is removed. If the laser moves too slowly, the laser may actually burn substrate. At an appropriate laser speed, the scale of the graphics will often vary in size with the laser power, so that laser power is often the most useful variable to adjust.
  • a component part is marked by a laser at different locations with different power and/or speed levels.
  • the characteristics of the marking may then be measured to create data associated with the different power and speed levels of the laser.
  • This data may then be used to create a relationship representing the characteristics of the laser over different power and/or speed levels.
  • the relationship may be expressed in the form of a curve, and equation, or a look-up table, for example.
  • Figure 1 shows the direct relationship between the scale of a particular graphic (a square shape) and laser power (expressed as current) for a particular manufacturing process, as the square data points.
  • a similar curve (not shown) can be expressed to show the effect of speed on the scale. The behavior in both cases is similar, each one bearing a relationship to the removal rate.
  • the curve Independently of substrate thickness or characteristics, the curve provides information on the laser parameters required to achieve the proper scaling. If the primary or only concern is the size (scale) of the icon or other graphic that is being produced, the user does not necessarily need to know the paint thickness.
  • any or all of the steps in the process of marking a component with a laser at different locations with different power and/or speed levels, then measuring the characteristics of the different markings and thereby generating a collection of data associated with different power and/or speed levels for the laser and then creating a curve representing the characteristics of the laser over different power and/or speed levels, may be automated.
  • the square data points, representing the scale of a particular graphic (a square) and laser power for a particular manufacturing process can be used to generate a best fit curve (shown as a dashed line).
  • a polynomial representing the best fit curve can then be determined. This polynomial can then be used to estimate the laser power. In the exemplary instance, this polynomial was determined to be:
  • Figure 2 shows exemplary products marked using different laser power settings to create test objects that may then be measured to generate data representative of the laser's substrate removal characteristics.
  • the power settings were determined by current and ranged from 11 to 28 amps.
  • the image being created by the laser is a square; accordingly, a series of squares are shown on each of the components.
  • the wheel on the right shows how the size of the graphics changes with laser power. Although not easily visible to the naked eye, each of the white squares has a different size. This process can yield highly repeatable results; indeed, when automated, size measurements were determined to a resolution of 0.01% and a repeatability of 0.2%.
  • the inventive techniques and products produced using these techniques allow a repeatable manufacturing process where the size of graphics may be maintained near constant.
  • the size of the graphics may be kept to within a scale of 100 ⁇ m, representing a variation of only 1% on a part that is only 10 mm in size. Larger or smaller size graphics similarly benefit.
  • a measurement resolution of 1% represents the ability to measure variations of the order of 10 ⁇ m in size, close to 10 times tolerances necessary to avoid visually perceptible differences.
  • the inventive method could open application to a wide variety of production technologies involving substrate removal via laser.
  • the etching of metal, such as metal alloys is commonly performed using a laser as an etching tool.
  • a laser as an etching tool.
  • the laser power is too weak, too little substrate material is removed.
  • laser power is too high, too much substrate material may be removed and the remaining substrate material may be burned or scorched.
  • the present technique can be of tremendous benefit.
  • the inventive method can be employed on a regular or routine basis so as to ensure the appropriate power and/or speed levels are selected for operation of the laser.
  • the method can automatically compensate for, for instance, a drop in laser power resulting from degradation in the laser based on recurrent use.
  • This system can be used in combination with the Intelligent Mark Positioning techniques, which are useful to ensure proper and appropriate mark alignment, both in terms of position and orientation.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)

Abstract

A method is provided for removing a substrate from a component with a laser. The method includes the steps of: applying a laser to a component at different locations with different power or different laser speed levels so as to remove a portion of a substrate from the component and thereby yield a number of markings on the component; measuring the different markings and generating a collection of data associated with different power or speed levels for the laser based on the markings; and adjusting at least one operating parameter of the laser based on the collection of data from the markings. Optionally, the method may be automated.

Description

LASER PARAMETER ADJUSTMENT
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claim priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/152,400 filed February 13, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
BACKGROUND
[0002] It is known to use a laser to remove paint or lacquer in a manufacturing process. For instance, this process is used in the production of component parts which are illuminated from the back. In particular, an image may be created on a product of manufacture, such as a button. In such a process, a portion of the product being manufactured is removed using a laser as a removal tool. This portion of the product being removed is shaped so that it forms an image. A light can then be shown through the product, and the image formed through the laser removal is readily visible.
[0003] The product may then be installed as part of a larger device such as a handheld, vehicular or other electronic device. For instance light installed in a dashboard with a series of one or more buttons or other indicators in front of the light would shine through different images on the buttons, thereby providing a visual indicator as to the function of the button. This allows a user to distinguish different buttons, even in an otherwise dark environment. Alternatively, one or more of these buttons may be installed on an electronic device such as a computer or telephone, or any other device where it might be desirable to light a visual image.
[0004] In producing these component parts, such as buttons, it is desirable to ensure that the images are manufactured within predefined tolerances regarding the position, orientation and scale of the image.
[0005] It is also known to use similar laser based processes in engraving and other arts where it is necessary to remove a defined portion of a substrate.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present disclosure provides a method of calibrating a laser for removing a substrate from a component with a laser. [0007] In one embodiment, a method for removing a substrate from a component with a laser. The method includes providing a component including a substrate. The component is subjected to a laser at a plurality of different locations with a plurality of different power levels or different laser speed levels to remove a portion of the substrate from the component and thereby yield a number of markings on the component. The characteristics of the plurality of different markings are measured, thereby generating a collection of data associated with different power or speed levels for the laser. A relationship is created to represent the characteristics of the laser over different power or speed levels. At least one operating parameter of the laser is adjusted based on the curve representing the characteristics of the laser.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0001] FIG. 1 is a graph showing the scale of a particular graphic as a function of power. [0002] FIG. 2 shows exemplary products marked using different laser settings so to create test objects used to generate data representative of a laser's substrate removal characteristics
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present disclosure provides a method of calibrating a laser for removing a substrate from a component with a laser.
[0009] In certain embodiments, the invention relates to a technique that allows an operator to ensure that the dimensions of the area from which substrate material is removed with the laser falls within desired parameters or tolerances. For instance, where the technology is applied to a product including an image on a button, certain aspects of the inventive technique may be used to ensure the image has the desired scale. This can be achieved with a relatively high degree of precision. From a manufacturing perspective, a laser used for etching will degrade over time, though not necessarily at a constant rate. Aside from laser degradation, other variables that may have an affect on the overall effective laser power, as measured by the amount of substrate effectively removed with the laser, include environmental temperature and humidity.
[0010] In manufacturing a number of component parts using a laser removal process, it may be important to ensure that the same amount of material is removed from the part, or that
9 the image created through removal of material has a uniform scale when compared against other parts.
[0011] Current customers are now finding out that the majority of their rejects are due to a scale change caused by a variation in paint thickness. Since the laser removal rate is constant, the thicker the paint, the less paint is removed and the smaller are the marked images or icons. In certain instances, where lacquer or paint is being removed from a component part, differences in the thickness of the lacquer or paint may result in differences in the image, such as an icon that is rendered on the component part. By ensuring that the laser power is appropriately adjusted, the manufacturing process can reliably create parts having icons of the same scale, or at least having a scale that falls within predefined tolerances.
[0012] In addition to the laser power, the speed at which the laser moves can be adjusted as the speed at which the laser moves affects the scale of the image being produced. If the laser moves too quickly, too little substrate material (paint or otherwise) is removed. If the laser moves too slowly, the laser may actually burn substrate. At an appropriate laser speed, the scale of the graphics will often vary in size with the laser power, so that laser power is often the most useful variable to adjust.
[0013] To determine the appropriate laser power, in one embodiment, a component part is marked by a laser at different locations with different power and/or speed levels. The characteristics of the marking may then be measured to create data associated with the different power and speed levels of the laser. This data may then be used to create a relationship representing the characteristics of the laser over different power and/or speed levels. The relationship may be expressed in the form of a curve, and equation, or a look-up table, for example.
[0014] Figure 1 shows the direct relationship between the scale of a particular graphic (a square shape) and laser power (expressed as current) for a particular manufacturing process, as the square data points. A similar curve (not shown) can be expressed to show the effect of speed on the scale. The behavior in both cases is similar, each one bearing a relationship to the removal rate.
[0015] This information is useful in a number of different ways:
[0016] 1. Assuming constant substrate (such as paint, lacquer, or even metal material such as an alloy) characteristics have not changed, the curves can be used to predict paint thickness. With this information, a user can decide on what laser and speed parameters are appropriate.
[0017] 2. Independently of substrate thickness or characteristics, the curve provides information on the laser parameters required to achieve the proper scaling. If the primary or only concern is the size (scale) of the icon or other graphic that is being produced, the user does not necessarily need to know the paint thickness.
[0018] Any or all of the steps in the process of marking a component with a laser at different locations with different power and/or speed levels, then measuring the characteristics of the different markings and thereby generating a collection of data associated with different power and/or speed levels for the laser and then creating a curve representing the characteristics of the laser over different power and/or speed levels, may be automated. [0019] The square data points, representing the scale of a particular graphic (a square) and laser power for a particular manufacturing process can be used to generate a best fit curve (shown as a dashed line). A polynomial representing the best fit curve can then be determined. This polynomial can then be used to estimate the laser power. In the exemplary instance, this polynomial was determined to be:
y = 2E-05x3 - 0.0013x2 + 0.0345x + 0.686
[0020] Figure 2 shows exemplary products marked using different laser power settings to create test objects that may then be measured to generate data representative of the laser's substrate removal characteristics. The power settings were determined by current and ranged from 11 to 28 amps. In Figure 2, the image being created by the laser is a square; accordingly, a series of squares are shown on each of the components. [0021] In Figure 2, the wheel on the right shows how the size of the graphics changes with laser power. Although not easily visible to the naked eye, each of the white squares has a different size. This process can yield highly repeatable results; indeed, when automated, size measurements were determined to a resolution of 0.01% and a repeatability of 0.2%. [0022] The inventive techniques and products produced using these techniques allow a repeatable manufacturing process where the size of graphics may be maintained near constant. In preferred embodiments, the size of the graphics may be kept to within a scale of 100 μm, representing a variation of only 1% on a part that is only 10 mm in size. Larger or smaller size graphics similarly benefit. A measurement resolution of 1% represents the ability to measure variations of the order of 10 μm in size, close to 10 times tolerances necessary to avoid visually perceptible differences.
[0023] The development of a feedback measurement system based on laser power/scale or even laser power/thickness provides a new and useful improvement over previously known manufacturing process. The results of power/scale measurements have also shown a clear correlation and significant resolution thereby facilitating the inventive feedback system to adapt the laser power to the paint thickness variation, when desired. [0024] Using the inventive techniques, a manufacturer will be able to:
• Automatically adapt the laser parameter to the paint characteristics and thickness.
• Repeat this process within the same batch several times on different parts to compensate for paint variations within the same batch and within the part placement in the painting booth.
• Eliminate the need to have quality control heavily involved.
• Allow manufacturers to achieve a higher yield.
• Reduce waste.
• Maximize production yield while maintaining correct graphic size.
[0025] The inventive method could open application to a wide variety of production technologies involving substrate removal via laser. For instance, the etching of metal, such as metal alloys is commonly performed using a laser as an etching tool. Like a paint or lacquer etching process, where the laser power is too weak, too little substrate material is removed. In contrast, where laser power is too high, too much substrate material may be removed and the remaining substrate material may be burned or scorched. Where there is a need to achieve a high level of precision and accuracy in these production processes, the present technique can be of tremendous benefit.
[0026] In an ongoing manufacturing process, the inventive method can be employed on a regular or routine basis so as to ensure the appropriate power and/or speed levels are selected for operation of the laser. Indeed, where the system is automated, for instance, where it is implemented by a computerized system, the method can automatically compensate for, for instance, a drop in laser power resulting from degradation in the laser based on recurrent use. This system can be used in combination with the Intelligent Mark Positioning techniques, which are useful to ensure proper and appropriate mark alignment, both in terms of position and orientation.
[0027] Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method for removing a substrate from a component with a laser, the method comprising: providing a component comprising a substrate; subjecting the component to a laser at a plurality of different locations with a plurality of different power levels or different laser speed levels to remove a portion of the substrate from the component and thereby yield a number of markings on the component; measuring characteristics of the plurality of different markings and thereby generating a collection of data associated with different power or speed levels for the laser; creating a relationship representing the characteristics of the laser over different power or speed levels; and adjusting at least one operating parameter of the laser based on the curve representing the characteristics of the laser.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one operating parameter is either laser power or laser speed.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one operating parameter is laser power.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the at least one operating parameter is laser speed.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the scale of the portion removed is less than or equal to 100 micron.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the relationship is expressed as a curve.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the relationship is expressed as an equation.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the relationship is expressed as a look-up table.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the component is subjected to the laser with a plurality of different power levels.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the component is subjected to the laser with a plurality of different speed levels.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the steps are automated.
12. A product produced by the method of claim 1.
13. The product of claim 12 wherein the product comprises an image adapted to be illuminated.
14. The product of claim 13 wherein the product is a button.
15. The product of claim 12 wherein the product comprises a plastic.
16. The product of claim 12 wherein the product comprises a metal.
PCT/US2010/024006 2009-02-13 2010-02-12 Laser parameter adjustment Ceased WO2010093857A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP10741760.2A EP2396138A4 (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-12 Laser parameter adjustment
US13/147,608 US20110293907A1 (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-12 Laser parameter adjustment
CN2010800078947A CN102317028A (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-12 Laser parameter adjustment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15240009P 2009-02-13 2009-02-13
US61/152,400 2009-02-13

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010093857A1 true WO2010093857A1 (en) 2010-08-19

Family

ID=42562069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/024006 Ceased WO2010093857A1 (en) 2009-02-13 2010-02-12 Laser parameter adjustment

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20110293907A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2396138A4 (en)
CN (1) CN102317028A (en)
WO (1) WO2010093857A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106001928A (en) * 2016-05-09 2016-10-12 四川大学 Selection method of laser parameters of laser paint removal

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014151479A2 (en) 2013-03-22 2014-09-25 Videojet Technologies Inc. Method of removing a coating of a substrate
CN107745589B (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-06-14 大族激光科技产业集团股份有限公司 A kind of laser marking machine and marking method thereof
US20190275616A1 (en) * 2018-03-06 2019-09-12 Goodrich Corporation Method for improving visual contrast of laser etch marking on painted substrates

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4937422A (en) * 1987-07-13 1990-06-26 Fanuc Ltd Method of correcting laser output power
US6191382B1 (en) * 1998-04-02 2001-02-20 Avery Dennison Corporation Dynamic laser cutting apparatus
US6556524B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2003-04-29 Yamaha Corporation Optimum-recording-speed determining method, recording-speed setting method and recording method for optical disk
US7350954B2 (en) * 2005-08-01 2008-04-01 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Display apparatus

Family Cites Families (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4803336A (en) * 1988-01-14 1989-02-07 Hughes Aircraft Company High speed laser marking system
US4922077A (en) * 1989-01-31 1990-05-01 Raytheon Company Method of laser marking metal packages
US5121371A (en) * 1990-06-18 1992-06-09 Bernoulli Optical Systems Company Optical servo system for magnetic disk
DE4212423C2 (en) * 1992-04-14 2001-08-30 Bayer Ag Process for the production of control elements with backlit symbols
US5283773A (en) * 1992-06-10 1994-02-01 Iomega Corporation Steering laser beam while etching optical servo tracks for magnetic disks
US5436027A (en) * 1993-12-23 1995-07-25 The Boeing Company Method of applying a coating design
JP3315556B2 (en) * 1994-04-27 2002-08-19 三菱電機株式会社 Laser processing equipment
JPH09107168A (en) * 1995-08-07 1997-04-22 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Laser processing method for wiring board, laser processing apparatus for wiring board, and carbon dioxide laser oscillator for processing wiring board
DE19534590A1 (en) * 1995-09-11 1997-03-13 Laser & Med Tech Gmbh Scanning ablation of ceramic materials, plastics and biological hydroxyapatite materials, especially hard tooth substance
US6163010A (en) * 1996-10-25 2000-12-19 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method and apparatus for laser cutting materials
US6350326B1 (en) * 1996-01-15 2002-02-26 The University Of Tennessee Research Corporation Method for practicing a feedback controlled laser induced surface modification
US6365061B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2002-04-02 Imation Corp. Multibeam laser servowriting of magnetic data storage media
KR100626983B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2006-09-22 미쓰보시 다이야몬도 고교 가부시키가이샤 Scribing method by use of laser
US6676878B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2004-01-13 Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. Laser segmented cutting
US6812430B2 (en) * 2000-12-01 2004-11-02 Lg Electronics Inc. Glass cutting method and apparatus with controlled laser beam energy
US6765174B2 (en) * 2001-02-05 2004-07-20 Denso Corporation Method for machining grooves by a laser and honeycomb structure forming die and method for producing the same die
US7288466B2 (en) * 2002-05-14 2007-10-30 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Processing method, manufacturing method of semiconductor device, and processing apparatus
US20050064137A1 (en) * 2003-01-29 2005-03-24 Hunt Alan J. Method for forming nanoscale features and structures produced thereby
GB2402230B (en) * 2003-05-30 2006-05-03 Xsil Technology Ltd Focusing an optical beam to two foci
TWI257564B (en) * 2004-06-11 2006-07-01 Youeal Electronics Co Ltd Metallic keypad and method for making the same
US7804043B2 (en) * 2004-06-15 2010-09-28 Laserfacturing Inc. Method and apparatus for dicing of thin and ultra thin semiconductor wafer using ultrafast pulse laser
JP2006123004A (en) * 2004-09-29 2006-05-18 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Laser processing method and laser processing apparatus
DE102006005089B4 (en) * 2006-02-04 2015-04-16 Preh Gmbh operating element
US7750267B2 (en) * 2006-04-25 2010-07-06 Van Denend Mark E Apparatus and method for laser engraveable printing plates
US7732731B2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2010-06-08 Gsi Group Corporation Method and system for laser processing targets of different types on a workpiece
US7888621B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2011-02-15 International Paper Co. Systems and methods for automatically adjusting the operational parameters of a laser cutter in a package processing environment
KR100865337B1 (en) * 2007-11-06 2008-10-27 주식회사 유라테크 Welding method of spark plug electrode tip
US8124911B2 (en) * 2008-03-31 2012-02-28 Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. On-the-fly manipulation of spot size and cutting speed for real-time control of trench depth and width in laser operations
US8051679B2 (en) * 2008-09-29 2011-11-08 Corning Incorporated Laser separation of glass sheets
JP2010087433A (en) * 2008-10-02 2010-04-15 Disco Abrasive Syst Ltd Laser processing method, laser processing apparatus, and manufacturing method of chip
US8895892B2 (en) * 2008-10-23 2014-11-25 Corning Incorporated Non-contact glass shearing device and method for scribing or cutting a moving glass sheet

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4937422A (en) * 1987-07-13 1990-06-26 Fanuc Ltd Method of correcting laser output power
US6191382B1 (en) * 1998-04-02 2001-02-20 Avery Dennison Corporation Dynamic laser cutting apparatus
US6556524B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2003-04-29 Yamaha Corporation Optimum-recording-speed determining method, recording-speed setting method and recording method for optical disk
US7350954B2 (en) * 2005-08-01 2008-04-01 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Display apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2396138A4 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106001928A (en) * 2016-05-09 2016-10-12 四川大学 Selection method of laser parameters of laser paint removal

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102317028A (en) 2012-01-11
US20110293907A1 (en) 2011-12-01
EP2396138A4 (en) 2013-12-04
EP2396138A1 (en) 2011-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20110293907A1 (en) Laser parameter adjustment
Ozturk et al. Grid marking and measurement methods for sheet metal formability
EP1233376A3 (en) Information processing apparatus and method
US20230010023A1 (en) Thickness compensation in a cutting and bending process
US10481052B2 (en) Quality control process to assess the aluminized coating characteristics of hot stamped parts
US20140090455A1 (en) Ding detection system
CN112078262B (en) Manufacturing method of screen printing product and manufacturing method of intelligent card
CN1352741A (en) Method for determination of surface texture
Kumar et al. An experimental technique to detect tool–workpiece contact in micromilling
Weckenmann et al. Monitoring coordinate measuring machines by calibrated parts
Heingärtner et al. Process control of forming processes to compensate temperature induced friction changes
JP5343314B2 (en) Surface shape measuring device
KR20080051478A (en) Grid generating apparatus and method for measuring strain of steel sheet
Perez Metallography and Microscopy
Razumić et al. Reproducibility of Areal Topography Parameters Obtained by Atomic Force Microscope
Hotař Application of fractal dimension in industry practice
KR100498151B1 (en) Method and device for precalculating previously unknown parameters of an industrial process
JP2010232434A (en) Level difference measuring method, level difference measuring apparatus, and scanning electron microscope apparatus
CN204495788U (en) A kind of device detecting coating covering performance
Meyer et al. Comparison of measurement methods for microsystem components: application to microstructures made by the deep x-ray lithography process (x-ray LIGA)
Baleani et al. Surface roughness measurements of turned parts through a vision-based measurement system: uncertainty analysis and performance comparison with state-of-the-art instruments
JP2002316288A (en) Correction method of laser irradiation position in laser processing
JP2005057037A (en) Calculation method of resist shrink amount
Babu et al. Evaluation of surface roughness using machine vision
JPH10170234A (en) Measuring method of strain during plastic working

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201080007894.7

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 10741760

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010741760

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13147608

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE