WO2015063603A1 - Prevention of gas hydrates formation in bop fluids in deep water operations - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention is directed to a method for preventing gas hydrates formation in BOP fluids in deep water well operations that includes the step of adding at least 28 % glycol by volume to a BOP fluid, whereby the hydrate phase equilibrium line shifts to the point where the operating conditions will not form a hydrate.

Description

Prevention of Gas Hydrates Formation in BOP Fluids in Deep Water Operations

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This Application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 1/897,727 filed on October 30, 2013, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

[0002] This invention relates to the field of deepsea drilling. More particularly, this ivention relates to methods and compositions for the prevention of gas hydrate formation within eep water hydraulic systems.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] A clathrate is a chemical substance consisting of a lattice that traps or ontains molecules. Clathrates, or gas hydrates, are crystalline water-based solids in which small on-polar molecules (typically gases) are trapped inside "cages" of hydrogen bonded, frozen /ater molecules. Gas hydrates are found in Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, where air trapped /ithin snow becomes a stable (air) gas hydrate at high-depth and low-temperature conditions, iitrogen gas and water can form a nitrogen gas hydrate in which a large amount of nitrogen is ^•apped within a crystallized water lattice.

[0004] Gas hydrates are typically stable under low-temperature and high-pressure onditions. Gas hydrate formation is problematic for the oil and gas industry in deep water rilling operations, owing to low temperature and high pressure conditions that favor the ormation of gas hydrates.

[0005] For example, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA) provides ocean temperatures at depth for various locations in the Pacific Ocean as well s other locations (McPhaden 1999). Typically, ocean depth can be divided into three vertical lyers. The top layer is the surface layer, or mixed layer. Water temperature is highest in the urface layer, and is easily influenced by solar energy, wind, and rain. The next layer is the lermocline, where water temperature drops rapidly as the depth increases. The lowest layer is ie deep-water layer. Water temperature in this zone decreases slowly as depth increases. Water jmperature in the deepest parts of the ocean averages about 36 °F (2 °C).

[0006] Hydrostatic pressure at depth h beyond the water's surface is given by the ormula p = p_Q + p-g-h, where p_Q is atmospheric pressure at sea level, p is the density of water, nd g is gravitational acceleration. In order to operate at drilling depths, BOP control systems are esigned to operate against extreme hydrostatic pressures. BOP accumulators are charged with p to 10,000 pounds per square inch (psi) of gas, typically nitrogen gas, to provide hydraulic ctuating force for BOP control systems. In some examples, BOP control system pressure is ,000 psi + the hydrostatic pressure of the seawater above it.

[0007] Gas hydrates may unexpectedly form within BOP control fluid at the jmperature and pressures encountered by BOPs in deep water drilling operations. Gas hydrate ormation is exacerbated when drilling in colder arctic waters, which occurs at temperatures near ie freezing point of water. Nitrogen gas hydrate formation in subsea BOP control systems is elieved to be the result of nitrogen gas entrapped in the tubing, or escaped from the subsea ccumulator bottles. The formation of nitrogen gas hydrates, or nitrogen hydrates, in the control ystem of a BOP is consistent with the loss of control of the BOP. There is a need in the idustry for methods and compositions to prevent the formation of gas hydrates within BOP ontrol systems.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008] For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is ow made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, in

[0009] FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating ocean temperature at depth for various Dcations in the Pacific Ocean. A BOP control system operating condition is superimposed Operating Point, filled square); [0010] FIG. 2 is a graph of ocean temperature as a function of water depth, with a uperimposed nitrogen hydrate phase equilibrium boundary line. The area below the diagonal ne represents conditions that are favorable for nitrogen hydrate formation;

[0011] FIG. 3 is graph illustrating a nitrogen hydrate phase diagram. The fitted ydrate phase equilibrium line separates conditions that favor the formation of nitrogen hydrates rom conditions that do not favor the formation of nitrogen hydrates. The Carroll-Duan orrelation line is fitted to various data points obtained from the literature. A BOP control system perating condition is superimposed (Operating Point, filled square). The BOP operating point is Dcated within the temperature-pressure region that favors nitrogen hydrate formation;

[0012] FIG. 4 is a schematic of the high pressure autoclave test cell employed in the xperiments;

[0013] FIG. 5 is a graph of experimental results for the nitrogen hydrate testing. ¾e proposed hydrate formation and dissociation point are derived from isochore tests;

[0014] FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating a nitrogen hydrate phase diagram and includes ata points for customary hydraulic fluids and presently-described compositions;

[0015] FIG. 7 is a table and corresponding graph of nitrogen hydrate dissociation oint measurements in the field water (FW), deionized water, 5 mass Fluid A in water, and 5 ass Fluid A + 30 mass MEG in water;

[0016] FIG. 8 is a graph demonstrating kinetic behavior of a 3% Fluid A + distilled /ater fluid at 3°C and 5,000 psig;

[0017] FIG. 9 is a graph illustrating the percent volume of glycol employed to revent hydrate formation for a 3,000 psig system pressure at the given water depths. The iternal system control pressure is 3,000 psi + the hydrostatic pressure of the seawater above it; nd

[0018] FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the percent weight of glycol needed to prevent ydrate formation. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0019] The present invention is directed to method and compositions for preventing le formation of gas hydrates in BOP fluids in deep water well operations. The method omprises the step of adding at least 28% by volume of an alcohol to a BOP fluid to give a ydrate-resistant BOP fluid. The alcohol is selected from the group consisting of monoethylene lycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, methanol, and a mixture thereof. Deep water well operations iclude drilling operations that occur below the surface of water.

[0020] A hydrate phase equilibrium line divides a BOP fluid's pressure-temperature raph into a region that favors the formation of gas hydrates and a region that does not favor the ormation of gas hydrates. Addition of at least 28% by volume of an alcohol to a BOP fluid shifts le hydrate phase equilibrium line to a state where a hydrate will not form under a given set of perating conditions. In some embodiments, addition of at least 28% by volume of an alcohol to BOP fluid reduces the temperature of the BOP fluid's hydrate phase equilibrium boundary pproximately 10° C for a given pressure. In some embodiments, 30% by volume of an alcohol 5 added to the BOP fluid. In embodiments, addition of an alcohol to a BOP fluid protects the >OP fluid against freezing.

[0021] In embodiments, BOP fluid comprises water and one or more fluid oncentrate additives. Water may be selected from deionized water, sea water, rig potable water, nd other types of water available to those of skill in the art. Fluid concentrate additives omprise one or more salts, lubricity components, e.g., mineral oils, vegetable oils, synthetic ydrocarbon oils, synthetic silicon-based oils, phospholipids, and mixtures thereof, antifreeze omponents, anti-corrosion components, bacterial and/or fungal growth inhibitors, elastomer ompatibility components, and other components that affect fluid physical properties, such as our point, viscosity, pH and specific gravity. In one embodiment, a hydrate-resistant BOP fluid omprises 5% by volume of a fluid concentrate additive, at least 28% by volume of an alcohol, nd a balance of rig potable water. In one embodiment, a hydrate-resistant BOP fluid comprises % by mass of a fluid concentrate additive, at least 28% by mass of an alcohol, and a balance of ig potable water. [0022] A method for preventing gas hydrate formation in BOP fluids in deep water /ell operations is described, comprising the step selected from the group consisting of: erification of stack mounted accumulator seals on a BOP, addition of at least 28% by volume of n alcohol to BOP fluid, addition of another inhibitor to the BOP fluid, the replacement of itrogen with helium or neon as the accumulator working gas, and monitoring the BOP control ystem to determine if a leak has occurred and initiate a countdown.

[0023] A hydrate-resistant BOP fluid comprises water and at least 28% by volume f an alcohol. The alcohol may be selected from the group consisting of monoethylene glycol, ropylene glycol, glycerol, methanol, and a mixture thereof. In some embodiments, a hydrate- ssistant BOP fluid comprises water and at least 28% by volume of an alcohol. In further mbodiments, a hydrate-resistant BOP fluid comprises water and at least 28% by mass of an lcohol.

[0024] As used herein the specification, "a" or "an" may mean one or more. As sed herein in the claim(s), when used in conjunction with the word "comprising", the words "a" r "an" may mean one or more than one. The terms "BOP fluid", and "BOP control system ydraulic fluid" are used interchangeably herein.

[0025] The use of the term "or" in the claims is used to mean "and/or" unless xplicitly indicated to refer to alternatives only or the alternatives are mutually exclusive, lthough the disclosure supports a definition that refers to only alternatives and "and/or." As sed herein "another" may mean at least a second or more.

[0026] The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical dvantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that ollows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be escribed hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be ppreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may e readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same urposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such quivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the ppended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the invention, oth as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages /ill be better understood from the following description when considered in connection with the ccompanying figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that each of the figures is rovided for the purpose of illustration and description only and is not intended as a definition of le limits of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0027] A study of a BOP control system malfunction identified the cause as :ing/crystallization of the hydraulic fluid. ROV noted some isolated frost-like substance on the xterior surface of several hoses and fittings as well as along the framework below the Super hear Ram and on the intermediate flange. There was also a formation of an ice-like substance riginating from the solenoid pilot vent tube when flowing from the vented solenoid. It was oted that all areas exhibiting this frost had some type of fluid leak near the observed frost Dcation when the system was pressured up on surface. Further analysis determined that the :ing/crystallization was gas hydrates resulting in the BOP control system fluid.

[0028] As discussed above, Figure 1 shows the seawater temperature at depth for arious locations in the Pacific Ocean. The seawater surface temperature varies from 21° C to ear 10° C within the first 1,000 ft. Seawater temperatures decrease quickly in depths beyond ,000 ft. Temperatures less than 5° C are not uncommon in water depths greater than 2,000 ft. ¾e operating conditions of the well site are superimposed on FIG. 1. The temperature of the /ater in which the malfunction occurred was approximately 3° C.

[0029] In FIG. 2, a nitrogen hydrate phase equilibrium boundary line is uperimposed on a graph of ocean temperature as a function of water depth. The area below the ne represents conditions that are favorable for nitrogen hydrate formation. The area above the ne represents conditions that are not favorable for the formation of nitrogen hydrates. FIG. 2 hows that conditions are favorable for hydrate formation in water depths as shallow as 1,800 ft. Lecognition of this phenomenon has gone unrecognized for many years. This may be explained y lack of information concerning the status of the BOP control system fluid and operating onditions relatively near the phase equilibrium boundary, which would have a long gas hydrate ormation period.

[0030] FIG. 3 is graph illustrating a nitrogen hydrate phase diagram. The fitted hase equilibrium boundary line separates conditions that favor the formation of nitrogen ydrates from conditions that do not favor the formation of nitrogen hydrates. The Carroll-Duan orrelation line is fitted to various data points obtained from the literature. Conditions at colder jmperatures and higher pressures will provide more impetus for hydrate formation and thus sduce the time it takes to form. A BOP control system operating condition is superimposed Operating Point, filled square). The BOP operating point is located within the temperature- ressure region that favors nitrogen hydrate formation.

[0031] In order to re-create the gas hydrate formation events, experiments were erformed to simulate the conditions during the BOP control system malfunction. The effects of alt (deionized water vs. rig potable water), fluid concentrate additive, and additional additives on itrogen hydrate formation were examined. The experiments demonstrated the formation of gas ydrates at various pressure, temperature, and BOP control system hydraulic fluid combinations, wo exemplary BOP control system hydraulic fluid additives used in the experiments described erein are Fluid A and Fluid B.

[0032] The experiments utilized a high pressure autoclave test cell (FIG. 4) custom uilt for the express purpose of gas hydrate formation studies. The fluid mixture in the test cell is ccurately pressurized and temperature controlled. Temperature probes and pressure transducer lonitor the conditions of the test cell and a magnetic motor spins an agitator at up to 1500 rpm to nsure the fluid mixture is well mixed.

[0033] The phase equilibrium point of the nitrogen hydrate is determined based on le isochoric step-heating method (Tohidi, et al. 2000). In this method, the cell is charged with le test fluids and pressurized to the desired starting pressure. The temperature is then lowered to 3rm gas hydrates (FIG. 5), growth being detected by an associated drop in the cell pressure (as as becomes trapped in hydrate structures). The cell temperature is then raised step- wise (-1° C teps), allowing enough time at each temperature step for equilibrium to be reached. At imperatives below the point of complete dissociation, gas is released from decomposing gas ydrates, giving a marked rise in the cell pressure with each temperature step. However, once the ell temperature has passed the final gas hydrate dissociation point, and all gas hydrates have isappeared from the system, a further rise in the temperature will result only in a relatively small ressure rise due to thermal expansion. This process results in two traces with different slopes on pressure versus temperature (P/T) plot, one before and one after the dissociation point. The oint where these two traces intersect (i.e., an abrupt change in the slope of the P/T plot) is taken s the dissociation point and the location of the phase equilibrium boundary. For iso-chore tests, le temperature of the system is decreased in defined steps continuously up to the moment that le gas hydrates are starting to form - see point [1] in FIG. 5. Gas hydrate formation can be ientified by a small increase and then a sudden big decrease in pressure [2] . Then, after the gas ydrates finished forming, see point [3] the sample will be heated up, point [4], in order to see the as hydrate dissociation.

[0034] The experimental testing determined the phase equilibrium boundary for itrogen hydrates of several fluids and the results are illustrated in FIG. 6. These fluids are as ollows:

[0035] Nitrogen + Distilled Water;

[0036] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water;

[0037] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 5% Fluid A;

[0038] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 30% Fluid A;

[0039] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 50% Fluid A;

[0040] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 5% Fluid A + 30% Mono Ethylene Glycol;

[0041] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 5% Fluid B; and

[0042] Nitrogen + Rig Potable Water + 10% Fluid B. [0043] The nitrogen hydrate formation experiments conducted with rig potable /ater show a small change due to the dissolved salt concentrations. However, this effect is egligible in the prevention of hydrate formation. The addition of 5%, and 10% by mass of BOP luid additives A and B to the rig potable water produced a small shift in the nitrogen hydrate hase equilibrium point. These two different BOP fluid additive concentrations investigated reduced a similar effect, and any difference between the two is not discernible in this study.

[0044] Addition of 30% and 50% Fluid A, FIG. 6 filled circle and filled diamond, sspectively, shifted the nitrogen hydrate phase equilibrium point to lower temperatures at a given ressure. However, the shift was not sufficient to prevent hydrate formation at the operating onditions.

[0045] A BOP fluid consisting of rig potable water + 5% Fluid A + 30% lonoethylene glycol produced a temperature reduction in the phase equilibrium boundary of pproximately 10° C at two different pressures. The addition of 30% monoethylene glycol shifts le phase equilibrium boundary, FIG. 6 dotted line, such that the resulting BOP fluid can be ubjected to lower temperatures and higher pressures without forming gas hydrates. Similar ssults were observed for the addition of propylene glycol and glycerol.

[0046] FIG. 7 illustrates experimental hydrate dissociation points for nitrogen gas ydrates in the presence of Field Water + 5 mass % Fluid A + 30 mass % monoethylene glycol. Experimental data generated earlier in this project are shown for comparison. Predicted hydrate hase boundary (dotted line, using HydraFLASH) is also presented. As shown in FIG. 7, the perating condition is outside the hydrate stability zone with around 2° C safety margin. This xperiment demonstrates that by adding 30 mass% MEG to the system (i.e., Field Water + 5 ass% Fluid A) the hydrate phase boundary shifts by around 11° C compared to that of deionized /ater, thereby making the resulting system safe for field use.

[0047] Gas hydrate formation requires the right conditions to form, and time is one f the variables which influences gas hydrate formation. The further the well operating condition 5 from the phase equilibrium line into the hydrate formation region, the faster the gas hydrate /ill form. Furthermore, fluid agitation reduces the time necessary for gas hydrate formation. )ne test may take days to run, and several tests are necessary to provide insight into the kinetic ehavior of the hydrate.

[0048] The kinetic behavior, or time for gas hydrate formation was evaluated in one xperiment. FIG. 8 shows the time necessary for a 3% Fluid A + distilled water at 3° C and a onstant pressure of 5,000 psig to form a nitrogen hydrate. Once the fluid was at the test onditions it took approximately 60 hours for the hydrate to form. It is expected that as the perating condition nears the phase equilibrium boundary, the amount of time required for ydrate formation will increase. The variability at different conditions is not known, but it emonstrates the long times required to form hydrates in some cases.

[0049] A number of correlations have been presented to calculate the stability zones or nitrogen gas hydrates (Carroll, Sloan, et al., and Tohidi, et al.). The experiments provided ssults consistent with that provided by others. The determination of the phase equilibrium point or nitrogen + distilled water based on the equipment measurements agrees well with the same iformation from van Cleef, Marshal, and others presented in FIG. 3. Therefore, good confidence xists in the ability of the equipment to produce accurate and real results.

[0050] A correlation can be made between the operating water depth and the squired volume of glycol to prevent the formation of nitrogen hydrates in the control system, igure 9 illustrates the relationship for a 3,000 psig control system pressure with 0° C and 2° C largin. FIG. 10 provides the same information as a weight percentage to determine how well le correlation compares with the experimental data.

[0051] Mitigation strategies can also be developed to prevent hydrates from orming in the BOP control fluid. These mitigation strategies include: Verification of stack lounted accumulator seals on the BOP; addition of 28% by volume of an alcohol to BOP fluid; ddition of another inhibitor which may require hardware modifications to the BOP; use of argon, elium or neon as the accumulator working gas in lieu of nitrogen; and monitoring of the BOP ontrol system to determine if a leak has occurred and initiate a countdown.

[0052] Most of the mitigation strategies developed have one or more significant isues that must be resolved for implementation. Addition of 28% by volume of an alcohol to the >OP fluid will shift the hydrate phase equilibrium line to the point where the operating onditions will not form a hydrate. This has been verified by testing and modeled successfully, lowever, this volume of glycol may not be acceptable for discharge to the environment.

[0053] Monoethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, methanol, or combinations lereof can be used. However, methanol is incompatible with some sealing materials and would squire an engineering study and testing before implementation.

[0054] Argon, helium or neon form hydrates at higher pressures/lower temperatures lan nitrogen. Using either of these gases in the BOP accumulators will mitigate the issue of ydrate formation. However, the equipment must be configured and arranged for the rig to andle argon, helium or neon. There is also a cost increase associated with using these gases in le system.

[0055] Nitrogen hydrates cannot form in the absence of nitrogen. Therefore, an ffective strategy in dealing with nitrogen hydrates is ensuring that the BOP accumulators do not jak nitrogen into the control system. A system of checks and tests should be developed to nsure that the operational BOP does not have nitrogen leaks into the control system.

[0056] As stated above, the ice-like substance observed is a nitrogen hydrate 3rmed by the leakage of nitrogen into the BOP control system. This assertion was corroborated y research into the literature concerned with hydrate formation as well as independent testing. ¾e formation of solid hydrates in the control system is consistent with the loss of control of the >OP, lack of evidence at the surface conditions, observed formation at the subsea conditions, and vidence gathered concerning the damaged accumulator seals of the unit.

[0057] Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in etail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made erein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended laims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the articular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, means, lethods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily ppreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, ompositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed that erform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the orresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention, accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, lachines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Carrol, John. Natural Gas Hydrates: A Guide for Engineers. Oxford: Elsevier, 2009.

McPhaden, Mike. "NODC Data Documentation Form." National Oceanic Data Center .

December 14, 1999.

http://www.nodc.noaa.gOv/archive/arc0001/0000003/l.l/data/0-data/ (accessed December 7, 2012).

Moran, Michael J., and Howard N. Shapiro. Fundamentals of Engineering

Thermodynamics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.

Sander, R. NIST Standard Reference Data - Nitrogen. 2011.

http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=C7727379&Units=SI&Mask=10#copyr ight (accessed December 6, 2012).

Sloan, E. Dendy, and Carolyn A. Koh. Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases. Boca Raton:

CRC Press, 2008.

Span, Roland, Eric W. Lemmon, Richard T. Jacobsen, Wolfgang Wagner, and Akimichi Yokozeki. "A Rerence Equation of State for the Thermodynamic Properties of Nitrogen for Temperatures from 63.151 to 1000 K and Pressures to 2200 MPa." Journal of Physical Chemistry Reference Data 29, no. 6 (2000): 1361 - 1433.

Tohidi, B., R. W. Burgass, A. Danesh, K. K. Ostergaard, and A. C. Todd. "Improving the Accuracy of Gas Hydrate Dissociation Point Measurements." Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 2000: 912 - 924.

Wagner, W., and A. PruB. "The IAPWS Formulation 1995 for the Thermodynamic

Properties of Ordinary Water Substance for General and Scientific Use." Journal of Physical Chemistry Reference Data 31, no. 2 (2002): 387 - 535.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:

1. A method for preventing formation of a gas hydrate in BOP fluid in deep water well operations comprising the step of adding at least 28% by volume of an alcohol to the BOP fluid.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of monoethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, methanol, and a mixture thereof.

3. The method of claim 1, whereby a temperature reduction is

produced in a hydrate phase equilibrium boundary of

approximately 10° C for a given pressure.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein 30% by volume of the alcohol is added to the BOP fluid.

5. A method for preventing formation of a gas hydrate in BOP fluid in deep water well operations comprising the step selected from the group consisting of: verification of stack mounted accumulator seals on a BOP, replacement of nitrogen with helium, neon, or argon as the accumulator working gas, and monitoring the BOP control system to determine if a leak has occurred and initiate a countdown.

6. A hydrate-resistant BOP fluid for deep water well operations, comprising at least 28% by volume of an alcohol.

7. The hydrate -resistant BOP fluid of claim 6, wherein the alcohol is selected from the group consisting of monoethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, methanol, and a mixture thereof.

8. The hydrate -resistant BOP fluid of claim 6, comprising 30% by volume of an alcohol.

9. The hydrate -resistant BOP fluid of claim 6, wherein a hydrate phase equilibrium boundary of the hydrate-resistant BOP fluid is approximately 10° C less for a given pressure than a hydrate phase equilibrium boundary of a BOP fluid without at least 28% by volume of an alcohol.