WO2020249123A1

WO2020249123A1 - Handling video unit boundaries and virtual boundaries

Info

Publication number: WO2020249123A1
Application number: PCT/CN2020/096044
Authority: WO
Inventors: Li Zhang; Kai Zhang; Hongbin Liu; Yue Wang
Original assignee: Beijing ByteDance Network Technology Co Ltd; ByteDance Inc
Current assignee: Beijing ByteDance Network Technology Co Ltd; ByteDance Inc
Priority date: 2019-06-14
Filing date: 2020-06-15
Publication date: 2020-12-17
Anticipated expiration: 2021-12-14
Also published as: KR20220020268A; CN118138754A; US20260089320A1; US12526407B2; EP3970366B1; JP7433346B2; CN114424539B; EP3970366C0; EP3970366A1; CN114424539A; JP2022536519A; EP3970366A4; US20220103817A1; BR112021024638A2; US12003712B2; US20240107014A1

Abstract

A method of video processing includes determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a virtual boundary is enabled for a block within the picture for a filtering process based on a rule related to a relationship between a bottom boundary of the block and the picture. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

Description

HANDLING VIDEO UNIT BOUNDARIES AND VIRTUAL BOUNDARIES

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

Under the applicable patent law and/or rules pursuant to the Paris Convention, this application is made to timely claim the priority to and benefits of International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2019/091324, filed on June 14, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2019/092861, filed on June 25, 2019, International Patent Application No. PCT/CN2019/095157, filed on July 8, 2019. For all purposes under the U.S. law, the entire disclosure of the aforementioned application is incorporated by reference as part of the disclosure of this application.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This patent document is directed generally to video coding and decoding technologies.

BACKGROUND

Video coding standards have evolved primarily through the development of the well-known ITU-T and ISO/IEC standards. The ITU-T produced H. 261 and H. 263, ISO/IEC produced MPEG-1 and MPEG-4 Visual, and the two organizations jointly produced the H. 262/MPEG-2 Video and H. 264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and H. 265/High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standards. Since H. 262, the video coding standards are based on the hybrid video coding structure wherein temporal prediction plus transform coding are utilized. To explore the future video coding technologies beyond HEVC, Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) was founded by VCEG and MPEG jointly in 2015. Since then, many new methods have been adopted by JVET and put into the reference software named Joint Exploration Model (JEM) . In April 2018, the JVET between VCEG (Q6/16) and ISO/IEC JTC1 SC29/WG11 (MPEG) was created to work on the next generation Versatile Video Coding (VVC) standard targeting at 50%bitrate reduction compared to HEVC.

SUMMARY

Using the disclosed video coding, transcoding or decoding techniques, embodiments of video encoders or decoders can handle virtual boundaries of coding tree blocks to provide better compression efficiency and simpler implementations of coding or decoding tools.

In one example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a virtual boundary is enabled for a block within the picture for a filtering process based on a rule related to a relationship between a bottom boundary of the block and the picture. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, usage of virtual samples generated based on a padding process associated with a filtering process for a block within the picture based on a rule related to a dimension of the block. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more video units and a bitstream representation of the video, to disable usage of samples across boundaries of the one or more video units in a filtering process. The bitstream representation is configured with a syntax flag that indicates that the usage is enabled. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a unified manner in which a padding process is applied for a filtering process according to a rule. The padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to boundaries of different video units. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a number of lines for which a padding process is applied in a filtering process according to a rule. The padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to at least two boundaries, the at least two boundaries comprising a virtual boundary and at least one other boundary. The rule is related to distances between the sample and the at least two boundaries. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, (1) a first manner of selecting a first sample prior to applying one or more in-loop filtering process and (2) a second manner of selecting a second sample after applying the one or more in-loop filtering process and prior to applying an adaptive filtering process. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, an order of applying multiple padding processes to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block for a filtering process. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a sample of the block is positioned within a distance from a boundary of the block to be a boundary sample for a filtering process according to a rule associated with a component identity of the block. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, that usage of samples across a boundary of a video unit of the video for a filtering process is disabled. The video comprises one or more video units and each of the one or more video units comprises one or more blocks. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a manner of applying a filtering process to the block without using padding samples. The method also includes performing the conversion based on the determining.

In another example aspect, a method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing a conversion between video blocks of a video picture and a bitstream representation thereof. Here, the video blocks are processed using logical groupings of coding tree blocks and the coding tree blocks are processed based on whether a bottom boundary of a bottom coding tree block is outside a bottom boundary of the video picture.

In another example aspect, another video processing method is disclosed. The method includes determining, based on a condition of a coding tree block of a current video block, a usage status of virtual samples during an in-loop filtering and performing a conversion between the video block and a bitstream representation of the video block consistent with the usage status of virtual samples.

In yet another example aspect, another video processing method is disclosed. The method includes determining, during a conversion between a video picture that is logically grouped into one or more video slices or video bricks, and a bitstream representation of the video picture, to disable a use of samples in another slice or brick in the adaptive loop filter process and performing the conversion consistent with the determining.

In yet another example aspect, another video processing method is disclosed. The method includes determining, during a conversion between a current video block of a video picture and a bitstream representation of the current video block, that the current video block includes samples located at a boundary of a video unit of the video picture and performing the conversion based on the determining, wherein the performing the conversion includes generating virtual samples for an in-loop filtering process using a unified method that is same for all boundary types in the video picture.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes determining to apply, during a conversion between a current video block of a video picture and a bitstream representation thereof, one of multiple adaptive loop filter (ALF) sample selection methods available for the video picture during the conversion and performing the conversion by applying the one of multiple ALF sample selection methods.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule disables using samples that cross a virtual pipeline data unit (VPDU) of the video picture and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies to use, for locations of the current video block across a video unit boundary, samples that are generated without using padding and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies selecting, for the in-loop filtering operation, a filter having dimensions such that samples of current video block used during the in-loop filtering do not cross a boundary of a video unit of the video picture and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies selecting, for the in-loop filtering operation, clipping parameters or filter coefficients based on whether or not padded samples are needed for the in-loop filtering and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

In yet another example aspect, another method of video processing is disclosed. The method includes performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule depends on a color component identity of the current video block and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

In yet another example aspect, a video encoding apparatus configured to perform an above-described method is disclosed.

In yet another example aspect, a video decoder that is configured to perform an above-described method is disclosed.

In yet another example aspect, a machine-readable medium is disclosed. The medium stores code which, upon execution, causes a processor to implement one or more of the above-described methods.

The above and other aspects and features of the disclosed technology are described in greater detail in the drawings, the description and the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows an example of a picture with 18 by 12 luma coding tree units CTUs that is partitioned into 12 tiles and 3 raster-scan slices.

FIG. 2 shows an example of apicture with 18 by 12 luma CTUs that is partitioned into 24 tiles and 9 rectangular slices.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a picture that is partitioned into 4 tiles, 11 bricks, and 4 rectangular slices.

FIG. 4A shows an example of coding tree blocks CTBs crossing picture borders when K = M, L < N.

FIG. 4B shows an example of coding tree blocks CTBs crossing picture borders when K<M, L=N.

FIG. 4C shows an example of coding tree blocks CTBs crossing picture borders when K<M, L<N.

FIG. 5 shows an example of encoder block diagram.

FIG. 6 is an illustration of picture samples and horizontal and vertical block boundaries on the 8×8 grid, and the nonoverlapping blocks of the 8×8 samples, which can be deblocked in parallel.

FIG. 7 shows examples of pixels involved in filter on/off decision and strong/weak filter selection.

FIG. 8 shows four 1-D directional patterns.

FIG. 9 shows examples of geometric adaptive loop filtering (GALF) filter shapes (left: 5×5 diamond, middle: 7×7 diamond, right: 9×9 diamond) .

FIG. 10 shows relative coordinates for the 5×5 diamond filter support.

FIG. 11 shows examples of relative coordinates for the 5×5 diamond filter support.

FIG. 12A shows an example arrangement for subsampled Laplacian calculations.

FIG. 12B shows another example arrangement for subsampled Laplacian calculations.

FIG. 12C shows another example arrangement for subsampled Laplacian calculations.

FIG. 12D shows yet another example arrangement for subsampled Laplacian calculations.

FIG. 13 shows an example of a loop filter line buffer requirement in VTM-4.0 for Luma component.

FIG. 14 shows an example of a loop filter line buffer requirement in VTM-4.0 for Chroma component.

FIG. 15A shows an example of ALF block classification at virtual boundary when N = 4.

FIG. 15B shows another example of ALF block classification at virtual boundary when N = 4.

FIG. 16A illustrate an example of modified luma ALF filtering at virtual boundary.

FIG. 16B illustrate another example of modified luma ALF filtering at virtual boundary.

FIG. 16C illustrate yet another example of modified luma ALF filtering at virtual boundary.

FIG. 17A shows an example of modified chroma ALF filtering at virtual boundary.

FIG. 17B shows another example of modified chroma ALF filtering at virtual boundary.

FIG. 18A shows an example of horizontal wrap around motion compensation.

FIG. 18B shows another example of horizontal wrap around motion compensation.

FIG. 19 illustrates an example of a modified adaptive loop filter.

FIG. 20 shows example of processing CTUs in a video picture.

FIG. 21 shows an example of a modified adaptive loop filter boundary.

FIG. 22 is a block diagram of an example of a video processing apparatus.

FIG. 23 is a flowchart for an example method of video processing.

FIG. 24 shows an example of an image of HEC in 3x2 layout.

FIG. 25 shows an example of number of padded lines for samples of two kinds of boundaries.

FIG. 26 shows an example of processing of CTUs in a picture.

FIG. 27 shows another example of processing of CTUs in a picture.

FIG. 28 is a block diagram of an example video processing system in which disclosed techniques may be implemented.

FIG. 29 is a flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 30 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 31 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 32 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 33 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 34 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 35 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 36 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 37 is another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

FIG. 38 is yet another flowchart representation of a method for video processing in accordance with the present technology.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Section headings are used in the present document to facilitate ease of understanding and do not limit the embodiments disclosed in a section to only that section. Furthermore, while certain embodiments are described with reference to Versatile Video Coding or other specific video codecs, the disclosed techniques are applicable to other video coding technologies also. Furthermore, while some embodiments describe video coding steps in detail, it will be understood that corresponding steps decoding that undo the coding will be implemented by a decoder. Furthermore, the term video processing encompasses video coding or compression, video decoding or decompression and video transcoding in which video pixels are represented from one compressed format into another compressed format or at a different compressed bitrate.

1. Brief summary

This document is related to video coding technologies. Specifically, it is related to picture/slice/tile/brick boundary and virtual boundary coding especially for the non-linear adaptive loop filter. It may be applied to the existing video coding standard like HEVC, or the standard (Versatile Video Coding) to be finalized. It may be also applicable to future video coding standards or video codec.

2. Initial discussion

Video coding standards have evolved primarily through the development of the well-known ITU-T and ISO/IEC standards. The ITU-T produced H. 261 and H. 263, ISO/IEC produced MPEG-1 and MPEG-4 Visual, and the two organizations jointly produced the H. 262/MPEG-2 Video and H. 264/MPEG-4 Advanced Video Coding (AVC) and H. 265/HEVC standards. Since H.262, the video coding standards are based on the hybrid video coding structure wherein temporal prediction plus transform coding are utilized. To explore the future video coding technologies beyond HEVC, Joint Video Exploration Team (JVET) was founded by VCEG and MPEG jointly in 2015. Since then, many new methods have been adopted by JVET and put into the reference software named Joint Exploration Model (JEM) . In April 2018, the JVET between VCEG (Q6/16) and ISO/IEC JTC1 SC29/WG11 (MPEG) was created to work on the VVC standard targeting at 50%bitrate reduction compared to HEVC.

2.1 Color space and chroma subsampling

Color space, also known as the color model (or color system) , is an abstract mathematical model which simply describes the range of colors as tuples of numbers, typically as 3 or 4 values or color components (e.g. RGB) . Basically speaking, color space is an elaboration of the coordinate system and sub-space.

For video compression, the most frequently used color spaces are YCbCr and RGB.

YCbCr, Y′CbCr, or Y Pb/Cb Pr/Cr, also written as YCBCR or Y'CBCR, is a family of color spaces used as a part of the color image pipeline in video and digital photography systems. Y′ is the luma component and CB and CR are the blue-difference and red- difference chroma components. Y′ (with prime) is distinguished from Y, which is luminance, meaning that light intensity is nonlinearly encoded based on gamma corrected RGB primaries.

Chroma subsampling is the practice of encoding images by implementing less resolution for chroma information than for luma information, taking advantage of the human visual system's lower acuity for color differences than for luminance.

2.1.1 Color format 4: 4: 4

Each of the three Y'CbCr components have the same sample rate, thus there is no chroma subsampling. This scheme is sometimes used in high-end film scanners and cinematic post production.

2.1.2 Color format 4: 2: 2

The two chroma components are sampled at half the sample rate of luma: the horizontal chroma resolution is halved. This reduces the bandwidth of an uncompressed video signal by one-third with little to no visual difference

2.1.3 Color format 4: 2: 0

In 4: 2: 0, the horizontal sampling is doubled compared to 4: 1: 1, but as the Cb and Cr channels are only sampled on each alternate line in this scheme, the vertical resolution is halved. The data rate is thus the same. Cb and Cr are each subsampled at a factor of 2 both horizontally and vertically. There are three variants of 4: 2: 0 schemes, having different horizontal and vertical siting.

In MPEG-2, Cb and Cr are cosited horizontally. Cb and Cr are sited between pixels in the vertical direction (sited interstitially) .

In JPEG/JFIF, H. 261, and MPEG-1, Cb and Cr are sited interstitially, halfway between alternate luma samples.

In 4: 2: 0 DV, Cb and Cr are co-sited in the horizontal direction. In the vertical direction, they are co-sited on alternating lines.

2.2 Various video units

A picture is divided into one or more tile rows and one or more tile columns. A tile is a sequence of CTUs that covers a rectangular region of a picture.

A tile is divided into one or more bricks, each of which consisting of a number of CTU rows within the tile.

A tile that is not partitioned into multiple bricks is also referred to as a brick. However, a brick that is a true subset of a tile is not referred to as a tile.

A slice either contains a number of tiles of a picture or a number of bricks of a tile.

Two modes of slices are supported, namely the raster-scan slice mode and the rectangular slice mode. In the raster-scan slice mode, a slice contains a sequence of tiles in a tile raster scan of a picture. In the rectangular slice mode, a slice contains a number of bricks of a picture that collectively form a rectangular region of the picture. The bricks within a rectangular slice are in the order of brick raster scan of the slice.

FIG. 1 shows an example of raster-scan slice partitioning of a picture, where the picture is divided into 12 tiles and 3 raster-scan slices.

FIG. 2 shows an example of rectangular slice partitioning of a picture, where the picture is divided into 24 tiles (6 tile columns and 4 tile rows) and 9 rectangular slices.

FIG. 3 shows an example of a picture partitioned into tiles, bricks, and rectangular slices, where the picture is divided into 4 tiles (2 tile columns and 2 tile rows) , 11 bricks (the top-left tile contains 1 brick, the top-right tile contains 5 bricks, the bottom-left tile contains 2 bricks, and the bottom-right tile contain 3 bricks) , and 4 rectangular slices.

2.2.1 CTU/CTB sizes

In VVC, the CTU size, signaled in SPS by the syntax element log2_ctu_size_minus2, could be as small as 4x4.

7.3.2.3Sequence parameter set RBSP syntax

log2_ctu_size_minus2 plus 2 specifies the luma coding tree block size of each CTU.

log2_min_luma_coding_block_size_minus2 plus 2 specifies the minimum luma coding block size.

The variables CtbLog2SizeY, CtbSizeY, MinCbLog2SizeY, MinCbSizeY, MinTbLog2SizeY, MaxTbLog2SizeY, MinTbSizeY, MaxTbSizeY, PicWidthInCtbsY, PicHeightInCtbsY, PicSizeInCtbsY, PicWidthInMinCbsY, PicHeightInMinCbsY, PicSizeInMinCbsY, PicSizeInSamplesY, PicWidthInSamplesC and PicHeightInSamplesC are derived as follows:

CtbLog2SizeY = log2_ctu_size_minus2+2 (7-9)

CtbSizeY = 1<<CtbLog2SizeY (7-10)

MinCbLog2SizeY = log2_min_luma_coding_block_size_minus2+2 (7-11)

MinCbSizeY = 1<<MinCbLog2SizeY (7-12)

MinTbLog2SizeY = 2 (7-13)

MaxTbLog2SizeY = 6 (7-14)

MinTbSizeY = 1<<MinTbLog2SizeY (7-15)

MaxTbSizeY = 1<<MaxTbLog2SizeY (7-16)

PicWidthInCtbsY = Ceil (pic_width_in_luma_samples÷CtbSizeY) (7-17)

PicHeightInCtbsY = Ceil (pic_height_in_luma_samples÷CtbSizeY) (7-18)

PicSizeInCtbsY = PicWidthInCtbsY*PicHeightInCtbsY (7-19)

PicWidthInMinCbsY = pic_width_in_luma_samples/MinCbSizeY (7-20)

PicHeightInMinCbsY = pic_height_in_luma_samples/MinCbSizeY (7-21)

PicSizeInMinCbsY = PicWidthInMinCbsY*PicHeightInMinCbsY (7-22)

PicSizeInSamplesY = pic_width_in_luma_samples*pic_height_in_luma_samples (7-23)

PicWidthInSamplesC = pic_width_in_luma_samples/SubWidthC (7-24)

PicHeightInSamplesC = pic_height_in_luma_samples/SubHeightC (7-25)

2.2.2 CTUs in a picture

Suppose the CTB/LCU size indicated by M x N (typically M is equal to N, as defined in HEVC/VVC) , and for a CTB located at picture (or tile or slice or other kinds of types, picture border is taken as an example) border, K x L samples are within picture border wherein either K<M or L<N. For those CTBs as depicted in FIG. 4A-4C, the CTB size is still equal to MxN, however, the bottom boundary/right boundary of the CTB is outside the picture.

FIG. 4A shows CTBs crossing the bottom picture border. FIG. 4B shows CTBs crossing the right picture border. FIG. 4C shows CTBs crossing the right bottom picture border

FIGS. 4A-4C show examples of CTBs crossing picture borders, (a) K=M, L<N; (b) K<M, L=N; (c) K<M, L<N

2.3 Coding flow of a typical video codec

FIG. 5 shows an example of encoder block diagram of VVC, which contains three in-loop filtering blocks: deblocking filter (DF) , sample adaptive offset (SAO) and ALF. Unlike DF, which uses predefined filters, SAO and ALF utilize the original samples of the current picture to reduce the mean square errors between the original samples and the reconstructed samples by adding an offset and by applying a finite impulse response (FIR) filter, respectively, with coded side information signaling the offsets and filter coefficients. ALF is located at the last processing stage of each picture and can be regarded as a tool trying to catch and fix artifacts created by the previous stages.

2.4 Deblocking filter (DB)

The input of DB is the reconstructed samples before in-loop filters.

The vertical edges in a picture are filtered first. Then the horizontal edges in a picture are filtered with samples modified by the vertical edge filtering process as input. The vertical and horizontal edges in the CTBs of each CTU are processed separately on a coding unit basis. The vertical edges of the coding blocks in a coding unit are filtered starting with the edge on the left-hand side of the coding blocks proceeding through the edges towards the right-hand side of the coding blocks in their geometrical order. The horizontal edges of the coding blocks in a coding unit are filtered starting with the edge on the top of the coding blocks proceeding through the edges towards the bottom of the coding blocks in their geometrical order.

2.4.1. Boundary decision

Filtering is applied to 8x8 block boundaries. In addition, it must be a transform block boundary or a coding subblock boundary (e.g., due to usage of Affine motion prediction, ATMVP) . For those which are not such boundaries, filter is disabled.

2.4.1 Boundary strength calculation

For a transform block boundary/coding subblock boundary, if it is located in the 8x8 grid, it may be filterd and the setting of bS [xD _i] [yD _j] (wherein [xD _i] [yD _j] denotes the coordinate) for this edge is defined in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

Table 1. Boundary strength (when SPS IBC is disabled)

Table 2. Boundary strength (when SPS IBC is enabled)

2.4.3 Deblocking decision for luma component

The deblocking decision process is described in this sub-section.

Wider-stronger luma filter is filters are used only if all the Condition1, Condition2 and Condition 3 are TRUE.

The condition 1 is the “large block condition” . This condition detects whether the samples at P-side and Q-side belong to large blocks, which are represented by the variable bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk respectively. The bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk are defined as follows.

bSidePisLargeBlk = ( (edge type is vertical and p ₀ belongs to CU with width >= 32) | | (edge type is horizontal and p ₀ belongs to CU with height >= 32) ) ? TRUE: FALSE

bSideQisLargeBlk = ( (edge type is vertical and q ₀ belongs to CU with width >= 32) | | (edge type is horizontal and q ₀ belongs to CU with height >= 32) ) ? TRUE: FALSE

Based on bSidePisLargeBlk and bSideQisLargeBlk, the condition 1 is defined as follows.

Condition1= (bSidePisLargeBlk || bSidePisLargeBlk) ? TRUE: FALSE

Next, ifCondition 1 is true, the condition 2 will be further checked. First, the following variables are derived:

- dp0, dp3, dq0, dq3 are first derived as in HEVC

- if (p side is greater than or equal to 32)

dp0 = (dp0 + Abs (p5 ₀-2*p4 ₀+p3 ₀) + 1) >> 1

dp3 = (dp3 + Abs (p5 ₃-2*p4 ₃+p3 ₃) + 1) >> 1

- if (q side is greater than or equal to 32)

dq0 = (dq0 + Abs (q5 ₀-2*q4 ₀+q3 ₀) + 1) >> 1

dq3 = (dq3 + Abs (q5 ₃-2*q4 ₃+q3 ₃) + 1) >> 1

Condition2= (d < β) ? TRUE: FALSE

where d= dp0 + dq0 + dp3 + dq3.

If Condition1 and Condition2 are valid, whether any of the blocks uses sub-blocks is further checked:

Finally, if both the Condition 1 and Condition 2 are valid, the proposed deblocking method will check the condition 3 (the large block strong filter condition) , which is defined as follows.

In the Condition3 StrongFilterCondition, the following variables are derived:

dpq is derived as in HEVC.

As in HEVC, StrongFilterCondition= (dpq is less than (β>>2) , sp ₃+sq ₃ is less than (3*β>>5) , and Abs (p ₀-q ₀) is less than (5*t _C+1) >>1) ? TRUE : FALSE.

2.4.4 Stronger deblocking filter for luma (designed for larger blocks)

Bilinear filter is used when samples at either one side of a boundary belong to a large block. A sample belonging to a large block is defined as when the width >= 32 for a vertical edge, and when height >= 32 for a horizontal edge.

The bilinear filter is listed below.

Block boundary samples p _i for i=0 to Sp-1 and q _i for j=0 to Sq-1 (pi and qi are the i-th sample within a row for filtering vertical edge, or the i-th sample within a column for filtering horizontal edge) in HEVC deblocking described above) are then replaced by linear interpolation as follows:

- p _i′= (f _i*Middle _s, t+ (64-f _i) *P _s+32) ＞＞6) , clipped to p _i±tcPD _i

- q _j′= (g _j*Middle _s, t+ (64-g _j) *Q _s+32) ＞＞6) , clipped to q _j±tcPD _j

where tcPD _iand tcPD _jterm is a position dependent clipping described in Section 2.4.7 and g _j, f _i, Middle _s, t, P _s and Q _s are given below:

2.4.5 Deblocking control for chroma

The chroma strong filters are used on both sides of the block boundary. Here, the chromafilter is selected when both sides of the chroma edge aregreater than or equal to 8 (chroma position) , and the following decision with three conditions are satisfied: the first one is for decision of boundary strength as well as large block. The proposed filter can be applied when the block width or height which orthogonally crosses the block edge is equal to or larger than 8 in chroma sample domain. The second and third one is basically the same as for HEVC luma deblocking decision, which are on/off decision and strong filter decision, respectively.

In the first decision, boundary strength (bS) is modified for chroma filtering and the conditions are checked sequentially. If a condition is satisfied, then the remaining conditions with lower priorities are skipped.

Chroma deblocking is performed when bS is equal to 2, or bS is equal to 1 when a large block boundary is detected.

The second and third condition is basically the same as HEVC luma strong filter decision as follows.

In the second condition:

d is then derived as in HEVC luma deblocking.

The second condition will be TRUE when d is less than β.

In the third condition StrongFilterCondition is derived as follows:

dpq is derived as in HEVC.

sp ₃= Abs (p ₃-p ₀) , derived as in HEVC

sq ₃= Abs (q ₀-q ₃) , derived as in HEVC

As in HEVC design, StrongFilterCondition = (dpq is less than (β >> 2) , sp ₃+ sq ₃ is less than (β >> 3) , and Abs (p ₀-q ₀) is less than (5 *t _C+ 1) >> 1)

2.4.6 Strong deblocking filter for chroma

The following strong deblocking filter for chroma is defined:

p ₂′= (3*p ₃+2*p ₂+p ₁+p ₀+q ₀+4) >>3

p ₁′= (2*p ₃+p ₂+2*p ₁+p ₀+q ₀+q ₁+4) >>3

p ₀′= (p ₃+p ₂+p ₁+2*p ₀+q ₀+q ₁+q ₂+4) >>3

The proposed chroma filter performs deblocking on a 4x4 chroma sample grid.

2.4.7 Position dependent clipping

The position dependent clipping tcPD is applied to the output samples of the luma filtering process involving strong and long filters that are modifying 7, 5 and 3 samples at the boundary. Assuming quantization error distribution, it is proposed to increase clipping value for samples which are expected to have higher quantization noise, thus expected to have higher deviation of the reconstructed sample value from the true sample value.

For each P or Q boundary filtered with asymmetrical filter, depending on the result of decision-making process in section 2.4.2, position dependent threshold table is selected from two tables (e.g., Tc7 and Tc3 tabulated below) that are provided to decoder as a side information:

Tc7 = {6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1} ; Tc3 = {6, 4, 2} ;

tcPD = (Sp == 3) ? Tc3 : Tc7;

tcQD = (Sq == 3) ? Tc3 : Tc7;

For the P or Q boundaries being filtered with a short symmetrical filter, position dependent threshold of lower magnitude is applied:

Tc3 = {3, 2, 1} ;

Following defining the threshold, filtered p’ _i and q’ _i sample values are clipped according to tcP and tcQ clipping values:

p” _i= Clip3 (p’ _i+ tcP _i, p’ _i–tcP _i, p’ _i) ;

q” _j= Clip3 (q’ _j+ tcQ _j, q’ _j–tcQ _j, q’ _j) ;

where p’ _i and q’ _i are filtered sample values, p” _i and q” _j are output sample value after the clipping and tcP _i tcP _i are clipping thresholds that are derived from the VVC tc parameter and tcPD and tcQD. The function Clip3 is a clipping function as it is specified in VVC.

2.4.8 Sub-block deblocking adjustment

To enable parallel friendly deblocking using both long filters and sub-block deblocking the long filters is restricted to modify at most 5 samples on a side that uses sub-block deblocking (AFFINE or ATMVP or DMVR) as shown in the luma control for long filters. Additionally, the sub-block deblocking is adjusted such that that sub-block boundaries on an 8x8 grid that are close to a CU or an implicit TU boundary is restricted to modify at most two samples on each side.

Following applies to sub-block boundaries that not are aligned with the CU boundary.

Where edge equal to 0 corresponds to CU boundary, edge equal to 2 or equal to orthogonalLength-2 corresponds to sub-block boundary 8 samples from a CU boundary etc. Where implicit TU is true if implicit split of TU is used.

2.5 SAO

The input of SAO is the reconstructed samples after DB. The concept of SAO is to reduce mean sample distortion of a region by first classifying the region samples into multiple categories with a selected classifier, obtaining an offset for each category, and then adding the offset to each sample of the category, where the classifier index and the offsets of the region are coded in the bitstream. In HEVC and VVC, the region (the unit for SAO parameters signaling) is defined to be a CTU.

Two SAO types that can satisfy the requirements of low complexity are adopted in HEVC. Those two types are edge offset (EO) and band offset (BO) , which are discussed in further detail below. An index of an SAO type is coded (which is in the range of [0, 2] ) . For EO, the sample classification is based on comparison between current samples and neighboring samples according to 1-D directional patterns: horizontal, vertical, 135° diagonal, and 45° diagonal.

FIG. 8 shows four 1-D directional patterns for EO sample classification: horizontal (EO class = 0) , vertical (EO class = 1) , 135° diagonal (EO class = 2) , and 45° diagonal (EO class = 3)

For a given EO class, each sample inside the CTB is classified into one of five categories. The current sample value, labeled as “c, ” is compared with its two neighbors along the selected 1-D pattern. The classification rules for each sample are summarized in

Table I. Categories

1 and 4 are associated with a local valley and a local peak along the selected 1-D pattern, respectively.

Categories

2 and 3 are associated with concave and convex corners along the selected 1-D pattern, respectively. If the current sample does not belong to EO categories 1–4, then it is category 0 and SAO is not applied.

Table 3: Sample Classification Rules for Edge Offset

Category	Condition
1	c<a and c<b
2	(c < a &&c==b) \|\| (c == a &&c < b)
3	(c > a &&c==b) \|\| (c == a &&c > b)
4	c > a &&c > b
5	None of above

2.6 Geometry Transformation-based Adaptive Loop Filter

The input of DB is the reconstructed samples after DB and SAO. The sample classification and filtering process are based on the reconstructed samples after DB and SAO.

In some embodiments, a geometry transformation-based adaptive loop filter (GALF) with block-based filter adaption is applied. For the luma component, one among 25 filters is selected for each 2×2 block, based on the direction and activity of local gradients.

2.6.1 Filter shape

In some embodiments, up to three diamond filter shapes (as shown in FIG. 9) can be selected for the luma component. An index is signalled at the picture level to indicate the filter shape used for the luma component. Each square represents a sample, and Ci (i being 0～6 (left) , 0～12 (middle) , 0～20 (right) ) denotes the coefficient to be applied to the sample. For chroma components in a picture, the 5×5 diamond shape is always used.

2.6.1.1 Block classification

Each 2×2 block is categorized into one out of 25 classes. The classification index C is derived based on its directionality Dand a quantized value of activity

as follows:

To calculate D and

gradients of the horizontal, vertical and two diagonal direction are first calculated using 1-D Laplacian:

Indices i and j refer to the coordinates of the upper left sample in the 2×2 block and R (i, j) indicates a reconstructed sample at coordinate (i, j) .

Then D maximum and minimum values of the gradients of horizontal and vertical directions are set as:

and the maximum and minimum values of the gradient of two diagonal directions are set as:

To derive the value of the directionality D, these values are compared against each other and with two thresholds t ₁ and t ₂:

Step 1. If both

and

are true, D is set to 0.

Step 2. If

continue from Step 3; otherwise continue from Step 4.

Step 3. If

D is set to 2; otherwise D is set to 1.

Step 4. If

D is set to 4; otherwise D is set to 3.

The activity value A is calculated as:

A is further quantized to the range of 0 to 4, inclusively, and the quantized value is denoted as

For both chroma components in a picture, no classification method is applied, e.g. asingle set of ALF coefficients is applied for each chroma component.

2.6.1.2 Geometric transformations of filter coefficients

FIG. 10 shows relative coordinator for the 5×5 diamond filter support: Left: Diagonal Center: Vertical flip, Right: Rotation.

Before filtering each 2×2 block, geometric transformations such as rotation or diagonal and vertical flipping are applied to the filter coefficients f (k, l) , which is associated with the coordinate (k, l) , depending on gradient values calculated for that block. This is equivalent to applying these transformations to the samples in the filter support region. The idea is to make different blocks to which ALF is applied more similar by aligning their directionality.

Three geometric transformations, including diagonal, vertical flip and rotation are introduced:

where K is the size of the filter and 0≤k, l≤K-1 are coefficients coordinates, such that location (0, 0) is at the upper left corner and location (K-1, K-1) is at the lower right corner. The transformations are applied to the filter coefficients f (k, l) depending on gradient values calculated for that block. The relationship between the transformation and the four gradients of the four directions are summarized in Table 4. FIG. 9 shows the transformed coefficients for each position based on the 5x5 diamond.

Table 4: Mapping of the gradient calculated for one block and the transformations

Gradient values	Transformation
g _d2 < g _d1 and g _h < g _v	No transformation
g _d2 < g _d1 and g _v < g _h	Diagonal
g _d1 < g _d2 and g _h < g _v	Vertical flip
g _d1 < g _d2 and g _v < g _h	Rotation

2.6.1.3 Filter parameters signalling

In some embodiments, GALF filter parameters are signalled for the first CTU, e.g., after the slice header and before the SAO parameters of the first CTU. Up to 25 sets of luma filter coefficients could be signalled. To reduce bits overhead, filter coefficients of different classification can be merged. Also, the GALF coefficients of reference pictures are stored and allowed to be reused as GALF coefficients of a current picture. The current picture may choose to use GALF coefficients stored for the reference pictures and bypass the GALF coefficients signalling. In this case, only an index to one of the reference pictures is signalled, and the stored GALF coefficients of the indicated reference picture are inherited for the current picture.

To support GALF temporal prediction, a candidate list of GALF filter sets is maintained. At the beginning of decoding a new sequence, the candidate list is empty. After decoding one picture, the corresponding set of filters may be added to the candidate list. Once the size of the candidate list reaches the maximum allowed value (e.g., 6) , a new set of filters overwrites the oldest set in decoding order, and that is, first-in-first-out (FIFO) rule is applied to update the candidate list. To avoid duplications, a set could only be added to the list when the corresponding picture doesn’t use GALF temporal prediction. To support temporal scalability, there are multiple candidate lists of filter sets, and each candidate list is associated with a temporal layer. More specifically, each array assigned by temporal layer index (TempIdx) may compose filter sets of previously decoded pictures with equal to lower TempIdx. For example, the k-th array is assigned to be associated with TempIdx equal to k, and it only contains filter sets from pictures with TempIdx smaller than or equal to k. After coding a certain picture, the filter sets associated with the picture will be used to update those arrays associated with equal or higher TempIdx.

Temporal prediction of GALF coefficients is used for inter coded frames to minimize signalling overhead. For intra frames, temporal prediction is not available, and a set of 16 fixed filters is assigned to each class. To indicate the usage of the fixed filter, a flag for each class is signalled and if required, the index of the chosen fixed filter. Even when the fixed filter is selected for a given class, the coefficients of the adaptive filter f (k, l) can still be sent for this class in which case the coefficients of the filter which will be applied to the reconstructed image are sum of both sets of coefficients.

The filtering process of luma component can controlled at CU level. A flag is signalled to indicate whether GALF is applied to the luma component of a CU. For chroma component, whether GALF is applied or not is indicated at picture level only.

2.6.1.4 Filtering process

At decoder side, when GALF is enabled for a block, each sample R (i, j) within the block is filtered, resulting in sample value R′ (i, j) as shown below, where L denotes filter length, f _m, n represents filter coefficient, and f (k, l) denotes the decoded filter coefficients.

FIG. 11 shows an example of relative coordinates used for 5x5 diamond filter support supposing the current sample’s coordinate (i, j) to be (0, 0) . Samples in different coordinates filled with the same color are multiplied with the same filter coefficients.

2.7 Geometry Transformation-based Adaptive Loop Filter (GALF)

2.7.1 Example GALF

In some embodiments, the filtering process of the Adaptive Loop Filter, is performed as follows:

O (x, y) =∑ _(i, j) w (i, j) . I (x+i, y+j) , (11)

where samples I (x+i, y+j) are input samples, O (x, y) is the filtered output sample (e.g. filter result) , and w (i, j) denotes the filter coefficients. In practice, in VTM4.0 it is implemented using integer arithmetic for fixed point precision computations:

where L denotes the filter length, and where w (i, j) are the filter coefficients in fixed point precision.

The current design of GALF in VVC has the following major changes:

(1) The adaptive filter shape is removed. Only 7x7 filter shape is allowed for luma component and 5x5 filter shape is allowed for chroma component.

(2) Signaling of ALF parameters in removed from slice/picture level to CTU level.

(3) Calculation of class index is performed in 4x4 level instead of 2x2. In addition, in some embodiments, sub-sampled Laplacian calculation method for ALF classification is utilized. More specifically, there is no need to calculate the horizontal/vertical/45 diagonal /135 degree gradients for each sample within one block. Instead, 1: 2 subsampling is utilized.

FIG. 12A-12D show Subsampled Laplacian calculation for CE2.6.2. FIG. 12 A illustrates subsampledpositions for vertical gradient, FIG. 12 illustrates subsampled positions for horizontal gradient, FIG. 12Cillustrates subsampled positions for diagonal gradient, and FIG. 12D illustrates subsampled positions for diagonal gradient.

2.8 Non-Linear ALF

2.8.1 Filtering reformulation

Equation (11) can be reformulated, without coding efficiency impact, in the following expression:

O (x, y) =I (x, y) +∑ _{(i, j) ≠ (0, 0)} w (i, j) . (I (x+i, y+j) -I (x, y) ) , (13)

where w (i, j) are the same filter coefficients as in equation (11) [exceptedw (0, 0) which is equal to 1 in equation (13) while it is equal to 1-∑ _{(i, j) ≠ (0, 0)} w (i, j) in equation (11) ] .

Using this above filter formula of (13) , VVC introduces the non-linearity to make ALF more efficient by using a simple clipping function to reduce the impact of neighbor sample values (I (x+i, y+j) ) when they are too different with the current sample value (I (x, y) ) being filtered.

More specifically, the ALF filter is modified as follows:

O′ (x, y) =I (x, y) +∑ _{(i, j) ≠ (0, 0)} w (i, j) . K (I (x+i, y+j) -I (x, y) , k (i, j) ) , (14)

where K (d, b) =min (b, max (-b, d) ) is the clipping function, and k (i, j) are clipping parameters, which depends on the (i, j) filter coefficient. The encoder performs the optimization to find the best k (i, j) .

In some embodiments, the clipping parameters k (i, j) are specified for each ALF filter, one clipping value is signaled per filter coefficient. It means that up to 12 clipping values can be signalled in the bitstream per Luma filter and up to 6 clipping values for the Chroma filter.

In order to limit the signaling cost and the encoder complexity, only 4 fixed values which are the same for INTER and INTRA slices are used.

Because the varianceof the local differences is often higher for Luma than for Chroma, two different sets for the Luma and Chroma filters are applied. The maximum sample value (here 1024 for 10 bits bit-depth) in each set is also introduced, so that clipping can be disabled if it is not necessary.

The sets of clipping values used in some embodiments are provided in the Table 5. The 4 values have been selected by roughly equally splitting, in the logarithmic domain, the full range of the sample values (coded on 10 bits) for Luma, and the range from 4 to 1024 for Chroma.

More precisely, the Luma table of clipping values have been obtained by the following formula:

Similarly, the Chroma tables of clipping values is obtained according to the following formula:

Table 5: Authorized clipping values

The selected clipping values are coded in the “alf_data” syntax element by using a Golomb encoding scheme corresponding to the index of the clipping value in the above Table 5. This encoding scheme is the same as the encoding scheme for the filter index.

2.9 Virtual boundary

In hardware and embedded software, picture-based processing is practically unacceptable due to its high picture buffer requirement. Using on-chip picture buffers is very expensive and using off-chip picture buffers significantly increases external memory access, power consumption, and data access latency. Therefore, DF, SAO, and ALF will be changed from picture-based to LCU-based decoding in real products. When LCU-based processing is used for DF, SAO, and ALF, the entire decoding process can be done LCU by LCU in a raster scan with an LCU-pipelining fashion for parallel processing of multiple LCUs. In this case, line buffers are required for DF, SAO, and ALF because processing one LCU row requires pixels from the above LCU row. If off-chip line buffers (e.g. DRAM) are used, the external memory bandwidth and power consumption will be increased; if on-chip line buffers (e.g. SRAM) are used, the chip area will be increased. Therefore, although line buffers are already much smaller than picture buffers, it is still desirable to reduce line buffers.

In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 13, the total number of line buffers required is 11.25 lines for the Luma component. The explanation of the line buffer requirement is as follows: The deblocking of horizontal edge overlapping with CTU edge cannot be performed as the decisions and filtering require lines K, L, M, M from the first CTU and Lines O, P from the bottom CTU. Therefore, the deblocking of the horizontal edges overlapping with the CTU boundary is postponed until the lower CTU comes. Therefore for the lines K, L, M, N reconstructed luma samples have to be stored in the line buffer (4 lines) . Then the SAO filtering can be performed for lines A till J. The line J can be SAO filtered as deblocking does not change the samples in line K. For SAO filtering of line K, the edge offset classification decision is only stored in the line buffer (which is 0.25 Luma lines) . The ALF filtering can only be performed for lines A-F. As shown in FIG. 13, the ALF classification is performed for each 4 x 4 block. Each 4 x 4 block classification needs an activity window of size 8 x 8 which in turn needs a 9 x 9 window to compute the 1d Laplacian to determine the gradient.

Therefore, for the block classification of the 4 x 4 block overlapping with lines G, H, I, J needs, SAO filtered samples below the Virtual boundary. In addition, the SAO filtered samples of lines D, E, F are required for ALF classification. Moreover, the ALF filtering of Line G needs three SAO filtered lines D, E, F from above lines. Therefore, the total line buffer requirement is as follows:

- Lines K-N (Horizontal DF pixels) : 4 lines

- Lines D-J (SAO filtered pixels) : 7 lines

- SAO Edge offset classifier values between line J and line K: 0.25 line

Therefore, the total number of luma lines required is 7 + 4 + 0.25 = 11.25.

Similarly, the line buffer requirement of the Chroma component is illustrated in FIG. 14. The line buffer requirement for Chroma component is evaluated to be 6.25 lines.

In order to eliminate the line buffer requirements of SAO and ALF, the concept of virtual boundary (VB) is introduced in the latest VVC. As shown in FIG. 13, VBs are upward shifted horizontal LCU boundaries by N pixels. For each LCU, SAO and ALF can process pixels above the VB before the lower LCU comes but cannot process pixels below the VB until the lower LCU comes, which is caused by DF. With consideration of the hardware implementation cost, the space between the proposed VB and the horizontal LCU boundary is set as four pixels for luma (e.g. N=4 in FIG. 13) and two pixels for chroma (e.g. N=2 in FIG. 9) .

2.9.1 Modified ALF block classification when VB size N is 4

FIGS. 15A-15B depict modified block classification for the case when the virtual boundary is 4 lines above the CTU boundary (N = 4) . As depicted in FIG. 15A, for the 4 x 4 block starting at line G, the block classification only uses the lines E till J. However Laplacian gradient calculation for the samples belonging to line J requires one more line below (line K) . Therefore, line K is padded with line J.

Similarly, as depicted in FIG. 15B, for the 4 x 4 block starting at line K, the block classification only uses the lines K till P. However Laplacian gradient calculation for the samples belonging to line K require one more line above (line J) . Therefore, line J is padded with line K.

2.9.2 Two-side padding for samples cross virtual boundaries

As depicted in FIGS. 16A-16C, truncated version of the filters is used for filtering of the luma samples belonging to the lines close to the virtual boundaries. Taking FIG. 16A for example, when filtering the line M as denoted in FIG. 13, e.g., the center sample of the 7x7 diamond support is in the line M. it requires to access one line above the VB (denoted by bold line) . In this case, the samples above the VB is copied from the right below sample below the VB, such as the P0 sample in the solid line is copied to the above dash position. Symmetrically, P3 sample in the solid line is also copied to the right below dashed position even the sample for that position is available. The copied samples are only used in the luma filtering process.

The padding method used for ALF virtual boundaries may be denoted as ‘Two-side Padding’ wherein if one sample located at (i, j) (e.g., the P0A with dash line in FIG. 16B) is padded, then the corresponding sample located at (m, n) (e.g., the P3B with dash line in FIG. 16B) which share the same filter coefficient is also padded even the sample is available, as depicted in FIGS. 16A-16C and FIGS. 17A-17B. In FIGS. 16A-16C, 7x7 diamond filter support, center is the current sample to be filtered. FIG. 16A shows one required line above/below VB need to be padded. FIG. 16B shows 2 required lines above/below VB need to be padded. FIG. 16C shows 3 required lines above/below VB need to be padded.

Similarly, as depicted in FIGS. 17A-17B, the two-side padding method is also used for chroma ALF filtering. FIGS. 17A-17B show modified chroma ALF filtering at virtual boundary (5x5 diamond filter support, center is the current sample to be filtered) . FIG. 17A shows 1 required lines above/below VB need to be padded. FIG. 17B shows 2 required lines above/below VB need to be padded.

2.9.3 Alternative way for implementation of the Two-side padding when non-linear ALF is disabled

When the non-linear ALF is disabled for a CTB, e.g., the clipping parametersk (i, j) in equation (14) are equal to (1<< Bitdepth) , the padding process could be replaced by modifying the filter coefficients (a.k.a modified-coeff based ALF, MALF) . For example, when filtering samples in line L/I, the filter coefficient c5 is modified to c5’ , in this case, there is no need to copy the luma samples from the solid P0A to dashed P0A and solid P3B to dashed P3B FIG. 18A. In this case, the two-side padding and MALF will generate the same results, assuming the current sample to be filtered is located at (x, y) .

c5. K (I (x-1, y-1) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -1) ) +c1. K (I (x-1, y-2) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -2) ) = (c5+c1) . K (I (x-1, y-1) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -1) ) (17)

since K (d, b) = d and I (x-1, y-1) =I (x-1, y-2) due to padding.

However, when the non-linear ALF is enabled, MALF and two-side padding may generate different filtered results, since the non-linear parameters are associated with each coefficient, such as for filter coefficients c5 and c1, the clipping parameters are different. Therefore,

c5. K (I (x-1, y-1) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -1) ) +c1. K (I (x-1, y-2) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -2) ) !=(c5+c1) . K (I (x-1, y-1) -I (x, y) , k (-1, -1) ) (18)

since K (d, b) ! = d, even I (x-1, y-1) =I (x-1, y-2) due to padding.

2.10 Specification on ALF filtering

Newly added parts are indicated in bold italicized underlined text. The deleted parts are indicated using [ [] ] .

7.3.2.4 Picture parameter set RBSP syntax

loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag equal to 1 specifies that in-loop filtering operations may be performed across brick boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that in-loop filtering operations are not performed across brick boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. The in-loop filtering operations include the deblocking filter, sample adaptive offset filter, and adaptive loop filter operations. When not present, the value of loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 1.

loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag equal to 1 specifies that in-loop filtering operations may be performed across slice boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. loop_filter_across_slice_enabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that in-loop filtering operations are not performed across slice boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. The in-loop filtering operations include the deblocking filter, sample adaptive offset filter, and adaptive loop filter operations. When not present, the value of loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 0.

pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag equal to 1 specifies that the in-loop filtering operations are disabled across the virtual boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that no such disabling of in-loop filtering operations is applied in pictures referring to the PPS. The in-loop filtering operations include the deblocking filter, sample adaptive offset filter, and adaptive loop filter operations. When not present, the value of pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 0.

pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries specifies the number of pps_virtual_boundaries_pos_x [i] syntax elements that are present in the PPS. When pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries is not present, it is inferred to be equal to 0.

8.8.5.2 Coding tree block filtering process for luma samples

Inputs of this process are:

– a reconstructed luma picture sample array recPicture _Lprior to the adaptive loop filtering process,

– a filtered reconstructed luma picture sample array alfPicture _L,

– a luma location (xCtb, yCtb) specifying the top-left sample of the current luma coding tree block relative to the top left sample of the current picture.

Output of this process is the modified filtered reconstructed luma picture sample array alfPicture _L.

The derivation process for filter index clause 8.8.5.3 is invoked with the location (xCtb, yCtb) and the reconstructed luma picture sample array recPicture _L as inputs, and filtIdx [x] [y] and transposeIdx [x] [y] with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1 as outputs.

For the derivation of the filtered reconstructed luma samples alfPicture _L [x] [y] , each reconstructed luma sample inside the current luma coding tree block recPicture _L [x] [y] is filtered as follows with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1:

– The array of luma filter coefficients f [j] and the array of luma clipping values c [j] corresponding to the filter specified by filtIdx [x] [y] is derived as follows with j=0.. 11:

– If AlfCtbFiltSetIdxY [xCtb>>Log2CtbSize] [yCtb>>Log2CtbSize] is less than 16, the following applies:

i=AlfCtbFiltSetIdxY [xCtb>>Log2CtbSize] [yCtb>>Log2CtbSize] (8-1172)

f [j] =AlfFixFiltCoeff [AlfClassToFiltMap [i] [filtidx] ] [j] (8-1173)

c [j] =2 ^BitdepthY (8-1174)

– Otherwise (AlfCtbFiltSetIdxY [xCtb>>Log2CtbSize] [yCtb>>Log2CtbSize] is greater than or equal to 16, the following applies:

i=slice_alf_aps_id_luma [AlfCtbFiltSetIdxY [xCtb>>Log2CtbSize] [yCtb>>Log2CtbSize] -16] (8-1175)

f [j] =AlfCoeff _L [i] [filtIdx [x] [y] ] [j] (8-1176)

c [j] =AlfClip _L [i] [filtIdx [x] [y] ] [j] (8-1177)

– The luma filter coefficients and clipping values index idx are derived depending on transposeIdx [x] [y] as follows:

– If transposeIndex [x] [y] is equal to 1, the following applies:

idx [] = {9, 4, 10, 8, 1, 5, 11, 7, 3, 0, 2, 6} (8-1178)

– Otherwise, if transposeIndex [x] [y] is equal to 2, the following applies:

idx [] = {0, 3, 2, 1, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 9, 10, 11} (8-1179)

– Otherwise, if transposeIndex [x] [y] is equal to 3, the following applies:

idx [] = {9, 8, 10, 4, 3, 7, 11, 5, 1, 0, 2, 6} (8-1180)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

idx [] = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11} (8-1181)

– The locations (h _x+i, v _y+j) for each of the corresponding luma samples (x, y) inside the given array recPicture of luma samples with i, j=-3.. 3 are derived as follows:

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and xCtb+x-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 3 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] , pic_width_in_luma_samples-1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1182)

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] -xCtb-x is greater than 0 and less than 4 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] -1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1183)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, pic_width_in_luma_samples-1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1184)

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and yCtb+y-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 3 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] , pic_height_in_luma_samples-1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1185)

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] -yCtb-y is greater than 0 and less than 4 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] -1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1186)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, pic_height_in_luma_samples-1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1187)

– The variable applyVirtualBoundary is derived as follows:

– If one or more of the following conditions are true, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 0:

– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture.

– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the brick and loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag is equal to 0.

– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the slice and loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag is equal to 0.

– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is one of the bottom virtual boundaries of the picture and pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1.

– Otherwise, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 1.

– The reconstructed sample offsets r1, r2 and r3 are specified in Table 8-22 according to the horizontal luma sample position y and applyVirtualBoundary.

– The variable curr is derived as follows:

curr = recPicture _L [h _x, v _y] (8-1188)

– The variable sum is derived as follows:

sum=curr+ ( (sum+64) >>7) (8-1190)

– The modified filtered reconstructed luma picture sample alfPicture _L [xCtb+x] [yCtb+y] is derived as follows:

– If pcm_loop_filter_disabled_flag and pcm_flag [xCtb+x] [yCtb+y] are both equal to 1, the following applies:

alfPicture _L [xCtb+x] [yCtb+y] =recPicture _L [h _x, v _y] (8-1191)

– Otherwise (pcm_loop_filter_disabled_flag is equal to 0 or pcm_flag [x] [y] is equal 0) , the following applies:

alfPicture _L [xCtb+x] [yCtb+y] =Clip3 (0, (1<<BitDepth _Y) -1, sum) (8-1192)

Table 8-22–Specification of r1, r2, and r3 according to the horizontal luma sample position y and applyVirtualBoundary

condition	r1	r2	r3
(y == CtbSizeY-5 \|\| y == CtbSizeY-4) && (applyVirtualBoundary== 1)	0	0	0
(y == CtbSizeY-6 \|\| y == CtbSizeY-3) && (applyVirtualBoundary== 1)	1	1	1
(y == CtbSizeY-7 \|\| y == CtbSizeY-2) && (applyVirtualBoundary== 1)	1	2	2
otherwise	1	2	3

8.8.5.4Coding tree block filtering process for chroma samples

Inputs of this process are:

– a reconstructed chroma picture sample array recPicture prior to the adaptive loop filtering process,

– a filtered reconstructed chroma picture sample array alfPicture,

– a chroma location (xCtbC, yCtbC) specifying the top-left sample of the current chroma coding tree block relative to the top left sample of the current picture.

Output of this process is the modified filtered reconstructed chroma picture sample array alfPicture.

The width and height of the current chroma coding tree block ctbWidthC and ctbHeightC is derived as follows:

ctbWidthC=CtbSizeY/SubWidthC (8-1230)

ctbHeightC=CtbSizeY/SubHeightC (8-1231)

For the derivation of the filtered reconstructed chroma samples alfPicture [x] [y] , each reconstructed chroma sample inside the current chroma coding tree block recPicture [x] [y] is filtered as follows with x=0.. ctbWidthC-1, y=0.. ctbHeightC-1:

– The locations (h _x+i, v _y+j) for each of the corresponding chroma samples (x, y) inside the given array recPicture of chroma samples with i, j=-2.. 2 are derived as follows:

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and xCtbC+x-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] /SubWidthC is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 2 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] /SubWidthC-xCtbC-x is greater than 0 and less than 3 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] /SubWidthC-1, xCtbC+x+i) (8-1233)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, pic_width_in_luma_samples/SubWidthC-1, xCtbC+x+i) (8-1234)

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and yCtbC+y-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] /SubHeightC is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 2 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] /SubHeightC-yCtbC-y is greater than 0 and less than 3 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] /SubHeightC-1, yCtbC+y+j) (8-1236)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, pic_height_in_luma_samples/SubHeightC-1, yCtbC+y+j) (8-1237)

– The variable applyVirtualBoundary is derived as follows:

– The bottom boundary of the current codingtree block is one of the bottom virtual boundaries of the picture and pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1.

– Otherwise, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 1.

– The reconstructed sample offsets r1 and r2 are specified in Table 8-22 according to the horizontal luma sample position y and applyVirtualBoundary.

– The variable curr is derived as follows:

curr = recPicture [h _x, v _y] (8-1238)

– The array of chroma filter coefficients f [j] and the array of chroma clipping values c [j] is derived as follows with j=0.. 5:

f [j] = AlfCoeff _C [slice_alf_aps_id_chroma] [j] (8-1239)

c [j] = AlfClip _C [slice_alf_aps_id_chroma] [j] (8-1240)

– The variable sum is derived as follows:

sum=curr+ (sum+64) >>7) (8-1242)

– The modified filtered reconstructed chroma picture sample alfPicture [xCtbC+x] [yCtbC+y] is derived as follows:

– If pcm_loop_filter_disabled_flag and pcm_flag [ (xCtbC+x) *SubWidthC] [ (yCtbC+y) *SubHeightC] are both equal to 1, the following applies:

alfPicture [xCtbC+x] [yCtbC+y] =recPicture _L [h _x, v _y] (8-1243)

alfPicture [xCtbC+x] [yCtbC+y] =Clip3 (0, (1<<BitDepth _C) -1, sum) (8-1244)

2.11 Examples of CTU processing

According to the current VVC design, if the bottom boundary of one CTB is a bottom boundary of a slice/brick, the ALF virtual boundary handling method is disabled. For example, one picture is split to multiple CTUs and 2 slices as depicted FIG. 19.

Suppose the CTU size is MxM (e.g., M = 64) , according to the virtual boundary definition, the last 4 lines within a CTB are treated below a virtual boundary. In hardware implementation, the following apply:

- If the bottom boundary of the CTB is the bottom boundary of a picture (e.g., CTU-D) , it processes the (M+4) × M block including 4 lines from above CTU row and all lines in current CTU.

- Otherwise, if the bottom boundary of the CTB is the bottom boundary of a slice (or brick) (e.g., CTU-C) and loop_filter_across_slice_enabled_flag (or loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag) is equal to 0, it processes the (M+4) × M block including 4 lines from above CTU row and all lines in current CTU.

- Otherwise, if a CTU/CTB in the first CTU row in a slice/brick/tile (e.g., CTU-A) , it processes the M × (M-4) block excluding the last 4 lines.

- Otherwise, if a CTU/CTB in not in the first CTU row of a slice/brick/tile (e.g., CTU-B) and not in the last CTU row of a of a slice/brick/tile, it processes the M × M block including 4 lines from above CTU row and excluding the last 4 lines in current CTU.

FIG. 19 shows an example of processing of CTUs in a picture.

2.12 360-degree video coding

The horizontal wrap around motion compensation in the VTM5 is a 360-specific coding tool designed to improve the visual quality of reconstructed 360-degree video in the equi-rectangular (ERP) projection format. In conventional motion compensation, when a motion vector refers to samples beyond the picture boundaries of the reference picture, repetitive padding is applied to derive the values of the out-of-bounds samples by copying from those nearest neighbors on the corresponding picture boundary. For 360-degree video, this method of repetitive padding is not suitable, and could cause visual artefacts called “seam artefacts” in a reconstructed viewport video. Because a 360-degree video is captured on a sphere and inherently has no “boundary, ” the reference samples that are out of the boundaries of a reference picture in the projected domain can always be obtained from neighboring samples in the spherical domain. For a general projection format, it may be difficult to derive the corresponding neighboring samples in the spherical domain, because it involves 2D-to-3D and 3D-to-2D coordinate conversion, as well as sample interpolation for fractional sample positions. This problem is much simpler for the left and right boundaries of the ERP projection format, as the spherical neighbors outside of the left picture boundary can be obtained from samples inside the right picture boundary, and vice versa.

FIG. 20 shows an example of horizontal wrap around motion compensation in VVC.

The horizontal wrap around motion compensation process is as depicted in FIG. 20. When a part of the reference block is outside of the reference picture’s left (or right) boundary in the projected domain, instead of repetitive padding, the “out-of-boundary” part is taken from the corresponding spherical neighbors that are of the reference picture toward the right (or left) boundary in the projected domain. Repetitive padding is only used for the top and bottom picture boundaries. As depicted in FIG. 20, thehorizontal wrap around motion compensation can be combined with the non-normative padding method often used in 360-degree video coding. In VVC, this is achieved by signaling a high-level syntax element to indicate the wrap-around offset, which should be set to the ERP picture width before padding; this syntax is used to adjust the position of horizontal wrap around accordingly. This syntax is not affected by the specific amount of padding on the left and right picture boundaries, and therefore naturally supports asymmetric padding of the ERP picture, e.g., when left and right padding are different. The horizontal wrap around motion compensation provides more meaningful information for motion compensation when the reference samples are outside of the reference picture’s left and right boundaries.

For projection formats composed of a plurality of faces, no matter what kind of compact frame packing arrangement is used, discontinuities appear between two or more adjacent faces in the frame packed picture. For example, considering the 3×2 frame packing configuration depicted in Figure 24, the three faces in the top half are continuous in the 3D geometry, the three faces in the bottom half are continuous in the 3D geometry, but the top and bottom halves of the frame packed picture are discontinuous in the 3D geometry. If in-loop filtering operations are performed across this discontinuity, face seam artifacts may become visible in the reconstructed video.

To alleviate face seam artifacts, in-loop filtering operations may be disabled across discontinuities in the frame-packed picture. A syntax was proposed to signal vertical and/or horizontal virtual boundaries across which the in-loop filtering operations are disabled. Compared to using two tiles, one for each set of continuous faces, and to disable in-loop filtering operations across tiles, the proposed signaling method is more flexible as it does not require the face size to be a multiple of the CTU size

2.13 Example Sub-picture based motion-constrained independent regions

In some embodiments, the following features are included:

1) Pictures may be divided into sub-pictures.

2) The indication of existence of sub-pictures is indicated in the SPS, along with other sequence-level information of sub-pictures.

3) Whether a sub-picture is treated as a picture in the decoding process (excluding in-loop filtering operations) can be controlled by the bitstream.

4) Whether in-loop filtering across sub-picture boundaries is disabled can be controlled by the bitstream for each sub-picture. The DBF, SAO, and ALF processes are updated for controlling of in-loop filtering operations across sub-picture boundaries.

5) For simplicity, as a starting point, the sub-picture width, height, horizontal offset, and vertical offset are signalled in units of luma samples in SPS. Sub-picture boundaries are constrained to be slice boundaries.

6) Treating a sub-picture as a picture in the decoding process (excluding in-loop filtering operations) is specified by slightly updating the coding_tree_unit () syntax, and updates to the following decoding processes:

○ The derivation process for (advanced) temporal luma motion vector prediction

○ The luma sample bilinear interpolation process

○ The luma sample 8-tap interpolation filtering process

○ The chroma sample interpolation process

7) Sub-picture IDs are explicitly specified in the SPS and included in the tile group headers to enable extraction of sub-picture sequences without the need of changing VCL NAL units.

Output sub-picture sets (OSPS) are proposed to specify normative extraction and conformance points for sub-pictures and sets thereof.

3. Technical problems solved by the solutions provided in the present document

The current VVC design has the following problems:

1. The current setting of enabling ALF virtual boundary is dependent on whether the bottom boundary of a CTB is a bottom boundary of a picture. If it is true, then ALF virtual boundary is disabled, such as CTU-D in FIG. 19. However, it is possible that a bottom boundary of a CTB is outside a bottom boundary of a picture, such as 256x240 picture is split to 4 128x128 CTUs, in this case, the ALF virtual boundary would be wrongly set to true for the last 2 CTUs which has samples outside of the bottom picture boundary.

2. The way for handling ALF virtual boundary is disabled for bottom picture boundary and slice/tile/brick boundary. Disabling VB along slice/brick boundary may create pipeline bubble or require processing 68 lines per Virtual pipeline data units (VPDU, 64x64 in VVC) assuming the LCU size to be 64x64. For example:

a. For decoders not knowing the slice/brick/tile boundaries upfront (w. e. low-delay applications) , the ALF line buffers need to be restored. Whether the content in the line buffers get used or not for the ALF filtering depends on whether the current CTU is also a slice/brick/tile boundary CTU, this information, however, is unknown until the next slice/brick/tile is decoded.

b. For decoders knowing the slice/brick/tile boundaries upfront, either the decoders need to live with pipeline bubbles (very unlikely) or run the ALF at a speed of 68 lines per 64x64 VDPU all the time (overprovision) , to avoid using the ALF line buffers.

3. Different ways for handling virtual boundary and video unit boundary, e.g., different padding methods are existing. Meanwhile, more than one padding methods may be performed for a line when it is at multiple boundaries.

a. In one example, if the bottom boundary of a block is a 360 degree virtual boundary and ALF virtual boundary is also applied to this block, in this case, the padding method for 360 degree virtual boundary may be firstly applied to generate virtual samples below the 360 degree virtual boundary. Afterwards, these virtual samples located below the 360 degree virtual boundary are treated as being available. And the ALF 2-side padding method may be further applied according to FIG. 16 A-C. An example is depicted in FIG. 25.

4. The way for handling virtual boundary may be sub-optimal, since padded samples are utilized which may be less efficient.

5. When the non-linear ALF is disabled, the MALF and two-side padding methods would be able to generate the same results for filtering a sample which requires to access samples crossing virtual boundary. However, when the the non-linear ALF is enabled, the two methods would bring different results. It would be beneficial to align the two cases.

4. Examples of techniques and embodiments

The listing below should be considered as examples to explain general concepts. The listed techniques should not be interpreted in a narrow way. Furthermore, these techniques can be combined in any manner.

The padding method used for ALF virtual boundaries may be denoted as ‘Two-side Padding’ wherein if one sample located at (i, j) is padded, then the corresponding sample located at (m, n) which share the same filter coefficient is also padded even the sample is available, as depicted in FIGS. 12-13.

The padding method used for picture boundaries/360-degree video virtual boundaries, normal boundaries (e.g. top and bottom boundaries) may be denoted as ‘One-side Padding’ wherein if one sample to be used is outside the boundaries, it is copied from an available one inside the picture.

The padding method used for 360-degree video left and right boundaries may be denoted as ‘wrapping-base Padding’ wherein if one sample to be used is outside the boundaries, it is copied using the motion compensated results.

In the following discussion, a sample is “at a boundary of a video unit” may mean that the distance between the sample and the boundary of the video unit is less or no greater than a threshold. A “line” may refer to samples at one same horizontal position or samples at one same vertical position. (e.g., samples in the same row and/or samples in the same column) . Function Abs (x) is defined as follows:

In the following discussion, a “virtual sample” refers to a generated sample which may be different from the reconstructed sample (may be processed by deblocking and/or SAO) . A virtual sample may be used to conduct ALF for another sample. The virtual sample may be generated by padding.

‘ALF virtual boundary handling method is enabled for one block’ may indicate that applyVirtualBoundary in the specification is set to true. ‘Enabling virtual boundary’ may indicate that the current block is split to at least two parts by a virtual boundary and the samples located in one part are disallowed to utilize samples in the other part in the filtering process (e.g., ALF) . The virtual boundary may be K rows above the bottom boundary of one block.

In the following descriptions, the neighboring samples may be those which are required for the filter classification and/or filtering process.

In the disclosure, a neighbouring sample is “unavailable” if it is out of the current picture, or current sub-picture, or current tile, or current slice, or current brick, or current CTU, or current processing unit (such as ALF processing unit or narrow ALF processing unit) , or any other current video unit.

1. The determination of ‘The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture’ is replaced by ‘The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture or outside the picture’ .

a. Alternatively, furthermore, in this case, the ALF virtual boundary handling method may be disabled.

2. Whether to enable the usage of virtual samples (e.g., whether to enable virtual boundary (e.g., set applyVirtualBoundary to true or false) ) in the in-loop filtering process may depend on the CTB size.

a. In one example, applyVirtualBoundary is always set to false for a given CTU/CTB size, e.g., for the CTU/CTB size equal to KxL (e.g., K=L=4) .

b. In one example, applyVirtualBoundary is always set to false for certain CTU/CTB sizes no greater than or smaller than KxL (e.g., K=L=8) .

c. Alternatively, ALF is disabled for certain CTU/CTB sizes, such as 4x4, 8x8.

3. Whether to enable the usage of virtual samples (e.g, padded from reconstructed samples) in the in-loop filtering processes (e.g., ALF) may depend on whether the bottom boundary of the block is the bottom boundary of a video unit which is in a finer granularity compared to a picture (e.g., slice/tile/brick) or a virtual boundary.

a. In one example, the ALF virtual boundary handling method may be enabled (e.g., applyVirtualBoundaryis set to true) for a coding tree block (CTB) if the bottom boundary of the CTB is the boundary of the video unit or a virtual boundary.

i. Alternatively, furthermore, if the bottom boundary is not a bottom picture boundary or if the bottom boundary is outside the picture, the above method is enabled.

b. When the bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is one of the bottom virtual boundaries of the picture and pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1, the ALF virtual boundary handling method may still be enabled (e.g., applyVirtualBoundary is set to true) .

c. In one example, whether to enable the ALF virtual boundary handling method (e.g., value of applyVirtualBoundary) for a CTB may only depend on the relationship between the bottom boundary of the CTB and the bottom boundary of a picture.

i. In one example, applyVirtualBoundary is set to false only if the bottom boundary of the CTB is the bottom boundary of a picture containing the CTB or if the bottom boundary is outside the picture.

ii. In one example, applyVirtualBoundary is set to true when the bottom boundary of the CTB is NOT the bottom boundary of a picture containing the CTB.

d. In one example, for when decoding the CTU-C in FIGS. 18A-18C, M × M samples may be filtered with K lines from above CTU and excluding K lines below the virtual boundary.

4. It is proposed to disable the usage of samples across brick/slice boundaries in the filtering process (e.g., ALF) even when the signaled controlling usage flags for loop filters crossing brick/slice boundaries (e.g., loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag/loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag) is true.

a. Alternatively, furthermore, the signaled loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag/loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_f lag may only control the filtering process of deblocking filter and SAO excluding ALF.

b. In one example, a virtual sample may be used instead of the reconstructed sample at the corresponding position to conduct ALF for another sample.

5. When one block (e.g., CTB) contains a sample located at a boundary of a video unit (such as slice/brick/tile/360-degree video virtual or normal boundaries boundaries/picture boundary) , how to generate the virtual sample inside or outside the video unit (e.g., padding methods) for in-loop filtering such as ALF may be unified for different kinds of boundaries.

a. Alternatively, furthermore, the method of virtual boundaries (e.g., the Two-side Padding method) may be applied to the block to handle the sample at boundary for in-loop filtering.

b. Alternatively, furthermore, the above methods may be applied when the block contains a sample located at the bottom boundary of the video unit.

c. In one example, when decoding the K lines of one block, if the K lines below the virtual boundary of the block (e.g., the last K lines in CTU-B of FIGs. 17A-17B) and the bottom boundary of the block is the bottom boundary of a video unit, virtual samples may be generated in the ALF classification/filtering process to avoid usage of other samples outside these K lines, e.g., the Two-side Padding method may be applied.

i. Alternatively, ALF maybe disabled for those last K lines.

d. In one example, when one line is at multiple boundaries (e.g., the distance between the line to the boundary is less than a threshold) , the padding process is performed only once regardless how many boundaries it may belong to.

i. Alternatively, furthermore, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be dependent on the position of the current line relative to all the boundaries.

ii. For example, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be decided by the distances between the current line and the two boundaries, such as when the current line is within two boundaries, with the two boundaries being above and below.

iii. For example, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be decided by the distance between the currentline and the nearest boundary, such as when the current line is within two boundaries, with the two boundaries being above and below.

iv. For example, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be calculated for each boundary independently, and the maximum one is selected as the final padded line number.

v. In one example, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be decided for each side (e.g., the above side and the below side) of the line.

vi. In one example, for the two-side padding method, how many neighboring lines shall be padded may be decided jointly for the two sides.

vii. Alternatively, furthermore, the 2-side padding method used by ALF is applied.

e. In one example, when one line is at multiple boundaries and there is at least one boundary in each side (e.g., the above side and the below side) of the line, ALF may be disabled for it.

f. In one example, when the number of the padded lines required by the current line is larger than a threshold, ALF may be disabled for the current line.

i. In one example, when the number of the padded lines in any side is larger than a threshold, ALF may be disabled for the current line.

ii. In one example, when the total number of the padded lines in both sides is larger than a threshold, ALF may be disabled for the current line.

g. Alternatively, furthermore, the above methods may be applied when the block contains a sample located at the bottom boundary of the video unit and the in-loop filtering such as ALF is enabled for the block.

h. Alternatively, furthermore, the above methods may be applied under certain conditions, such as when the block contains a sample located at the bottom boundary of the video unit and filtering crossing the boundaries is disallowed (e.g., pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag /loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag/loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag is true) .

6. When a sample is of at least two boundaries of one block (e.g., at least one which is above current line is the ALF Virtual boundary, and below is the other boundary) , how many lines to be padded is not purely decided by the distance between current line relative to the ALF virtual boundary. Instead, it is determined by the distances between current line relative to the two boundaries.

a. In one example, the number of lines for per-side padding is set to (M –min (D0, D1) ) .

b. In one example, the number of lines for per-side padding is set to (M –max (D0, D1) ) .

c. For above example, D0, D1 denote the distance between current line and the above/below boundaries.

d. For above example, M denote the number of lines that ALF virtual boundary is from the bottom of one CTU.

7. At least two ways of selecting samples in the ALF classification and/or ALF linear or non-linear filtering process may be defined, with one of them selects samples before any in-loop filtering method is applied; and the other selects samples after one or multiple in-loop filtering methods are applied but before ALF is applied.

a. In one example, the selection of different ways may depend on the location of samples to be filtered.

b. In one example, a sample at the bottom boundary of a video unit (such as CTB) may be selected with the first method when it is used in ALF for another sample. Otherwise (it is not at the boundary) , the second method is selected.

8. It is proposed to disable the usage of samples crossing a VPDU boundary (e.g., a 64x64 region) in the filtering process.

a. In one example, when a sample required by the ALF classification process is outside the VPDU boundary, or below the virtual boundary, it may be replaced by a virtual sample or the classification results for the sample may be copied from that associated with other samples, such as padded from available ones.

b. In one example, when a sample required by a filtering process is outside the VPDU boundary, or below the virtual boundary, it may be replaced by a virtual sample, such as padded from available ones.

c. In one example, the ALF virtual boundary handling method may be enabled (e.g., applyVirtualBoundary is set to true) for a block if it contains samples located at the boundary of a VPDU.

d. Alternatively, usage of samples crossing a horizontal VPDU boundary may be disabled in the filtering process.

i. In one example, when a sample required by a filtering process is below the horizontal VPDU boundary, or below the virtual boundary, it may be replaced by a virtual sample, such as padded from available ones.

e. Alternatively, usage of samples crossing a vertical VPDU boundary may be disabled in the filtering process.

i. In one example, when a sample required by a filtering process is outside the vertical VPDU boundary, or below the virtual boundary, it may be replaced by a virtual sample, such as padded from available ones.

9. Instead of using padded samples (e.g., not unavailable, above/below virtual boundaries, above/below boundaries of a video unit) in the ALF classification/filtering process, it is proposed to use the reconstructed samples before all in-loop filters.

a. Alternatively, furthermore, the concept of two-side padding is applied via padding samples from the reconstructed samples before all in-loop filters.

i. In one example, if a sample in a filter support is from reconstructed samples before all in-loop filters, the symmetric (e.g., symmetrical about the origin, e.g., the current sample) sample in the filter support shall also uses the reconstructed one before all in-loop filters.

1. Suppose the coordinate of the current sample to be filtered is (0, 0) and the sample located at (i, j) is the reconstructed one before all in-loop filters, then the sample located at (-i, -j) is the reconstructed one before all in-loop filters.

2. Suppose the coordinate of the current sample to be filtered is (x, y) and the sample located at (x + i, y + j) is the reconstructed one before all in-loop filters, then the sample located at (x –i, y –j) is the reconstructed one before all in-loop filters.

b. Alternatively, furthermore, when In-loop reshaping (a.k.a LMCS) is enabled, the reconstructed samples before all in-loop filters are those in the original domain converted from the reshaped domain.

10. Instead of using padded samples (e.g., not unavailable, above/below virtual boundaries, above/below boundaries of a video unit) in the ALF filtering process, it is proposed to employ different ALF filter supports.

a. In one example, suppose a sample needs to be padded in the above method, instead of performing the padding, filter coefficient associated with the sample is set to be zero.

i. In this case, the filter support is modified by excluding samples which require to be padded.

ii. Alternatively, furthermore, the filter coefficients applied to other samples except the current sample is kept unchanged, however, the filter coefficient applied to current sample may be modified, such as ( (1<<C_BD) –sum of all filter coefficients applied to samples which don’t need to be padded) wherein C_BD indicates the filter coefficient’s bit-depth.

1. Taking FIGS. 18A-18B for example, when filtering lines L and I, the filter coefficient c12 applied to current sample is modified to be ( (1<< C_BD) –2* (c4+c5+c6+c7+c8+c9+c10+c11) ) .

b. In one example, suppose a sample (x1, y1) is padded from (x2, y2) in above method, instead of performing the padding, filter coefficient associated with (x1, y1) is added to that of the position (x2, y2) regardless the non-linear filter is enabled or disabled.

i. Alternatively, furthermore, the clipping parameter for (x2, y2) may be derived on-the-fly.

1. In one example, it may be set equal to the decoded clipping parameter for (x2, y2) .

2. Alternatively, it may be set to the returned value of a function with the decoded clipping parameters for (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) as inputs, such as larger value or smaller value.

11. Selection of clipping parameters/filter coefficients/filter supports may be dependent on whether filtering a sample need to access padded samples (e.g., not unavailable, above/below virtual boundaries, above/below boundaries of a video unit) .

a. In one example, different clipping parameters/filter coefficients/filter supports may be utilized for samples with same class index but for some of them require accessing padded samples and other don’t.

b. In one example, the clipping parameters/filter coefficients/filter supports for filtering samples which require to access padded samples may be signaled in CTU/region/slice/tile level.

c. In one example, the clipping parameters/filter coefficients/filter supports for filtering samples which require to access padded samples may be derived from that used for filtering samples which don’t require to access padded samples.

i. In one example, bullets 9a or 9b may be applied.

12. How to handle a sample at a boundary for in-loop filtering (such as ALF) may depend on the color component and/or color format.

a. For example, the definition of “at boundary” may be different for different color components. In one example, a luma sample is at the bottom boundary if the distance between it and the bottom boundary is less than T1; a chroma sample is at the bottom boundary if the distance between it and the bottom boundary is less than T2. T1 and T2 may be different.

i. In one example, T1 and T2 may be different when the color format is not 4: 4: 4.

13. When bottom/top/left/right boundary of one CTU/VPDU is also a boundary of a slice/tile/brick/sub-region with independent coding, a fixed order of multiple padding processes is applied.

a. In one example, in a first step, the padding method (e.g., 1-side padding) of slice/tile/brick is firstly applied. Afterwards, the padding method for handling ALF virtual boundaries (e.g., 2-side padding method) is further applied during a second step. In this case, the padded samples after the first step are marked as available and may be used to decide how many lines to be padded in the ALF virtual boundary process. The same rule (e.g., Figure 16) for handling CTUs which are not located at those boundaries are utilized.

14. The proposed methods may be applied to one or multiple boundaries between two sub-pictures.

a. The boundary applying the proposed methods may be a horizontal boundary.

b. The boundary applying the proposed methods may be a vertical boundary.

5. Embodiments

In the sections below, some examples of how current version of the VVC standard be modified to accommodate some embodiments of disclosed technology is described. Newly added parts are indicated in bold italicized underlined text. The deleted parts are indicated using [ [] ] .

5.1 Embodiment #1

loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag equal to 1 specifies that in-loop filtering operations may be performed across brick boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that in-loop filtering operations are not performed across brick boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. The in-loop filtering operations include the deblocking filter, sample adaptive offset filter [ [, and adaptive loop filter] ] operations. When not present, the value of loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 1.

loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flagequal to 1 specifies that in-loop filtering operations may be performed across slice boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. loop_filter_across_slice_enabled_flag equal to 0 specifies that in-loop filtering operations are not performed across slice boundaries in pictures referring to the PPS. The in-loop filtering operations include the deblocking filter, sample adaptive offset filter [ [, and adaptive loop filter] ] operations. When not present, the value of loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag is inferred to be equal to 0.

5.2 Embodiment #2

FIG. 21 shows processing of CTUs in a picture. The differences compared to FIG. 19 highlighted with the dashed lines.

5.3 Embodiment #3

8.8.5.2 Coding tree block filtering process for luma samples

Inputs of this process are:

– a filtered reconstructed luma picture sample array alfPicture _L,

– …

– The variable applyVirtualBoundary is derived as follows:

– If [ [one or more of] ] the following condition [ [sare] ] is true, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 0:

– The bottomboundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture.

[ [– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the brick and loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag is equal to 0.

– The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is one of the bottom virtual boundaries of the picture and pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1. ] ]

– Otherwise, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 1.

– …

8.8.5.4 Coding tree block filtering process for chroma samples

Inputs of this process are:

– a filtered reconstructed chroma picture sample array alfPicture,

ctbWidthC=CtbSizeY/SubWidthC (8-1230)

ctbHeightC=CtbSizeY/SubHeightC (8-1231)

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] /SubWidthC-1, xCtbC+x+i) (8-1233)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, pic_width_in_luma_samples/SubWidthC-1, xCtbC+x+i) (8-1234)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, pic_height_in_luma_samples/SubHeightC-1, yCtbC+y+j) (8-1237)

– The variable applyVirtualBoundary is derived as follows:

– [ [The bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the brick and loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag is equal to 0.

– Otherwise, applyVirtualBoundary is set equal to 1.

…

Alterantively, the condition “he bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture” can be replaced by “the bottom boundary of the current coding tree block is the bottom boundary of the picture or outside the picture. ”

5.4 Embodiment #4

This embodiment shows an example of disallowing using samples below the VPDU region in the ALF classification process (corresponding to bullet 7 in section 4) .

8.8.5.3Derivation process for ALF transpose and filter index for luma samples

Inputs of this process are:

– a luma location (xCtb, yCtb) specifying the top-left sample of the current luma coding tree block relative to the top left sample of the current picture,

– a reconstructed luma picture sample array recPicture _Lprior to the adaptive loop filtering process.

Outputs of this process are

– the classification filter index array filtIdx [x] [y] with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1,

– the transpose index array transposeIdx [x] [y] with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1.

The locations (h _x+i, v _y+j) for each of the corresponding luma samples (x, y) inside the given array recPicture of luma samples with i, j=-2.. 5 are derived as follows:

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and xCtb+x-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 2 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] , pic_width_in_luma_samples-1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1193)

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] -xCtb-x is greater than 0 and less than 6 for any n=0.. pps_num_ver_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosX [n] -1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1194)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

h _x+i=Clip3 (0, pic_width_in_luma_samples-1, xCtb+x+i) (8-1195)

– If pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and yCtb+y-PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] is greater than or equal to 0 and less than 2 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] , pic_height_in_luma_samples-1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1196)

– Otherwise, if pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag is equal to 1 and PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] -yCtb-y is greater than 0 and less than 6 for any n=0.. pps_num_hor_virtual_boundaries-1, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, PpsVirtualBoundariesPosY [n] -1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1197)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

– If yCtb+CtbSizeY is greater than or equal to pic_height_in_luma_samples, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, pic_height_in_luma_samples-1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1198)

– Otherwise, if y is less than CtbSizeY-4, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (0, yCtb + CtbSizeY-5, yCtb+y+j) (8-1199)

– Otherwise, the following applies:

v _y+j=Clip3 (yCtb+CtbSizeY-4, pic_height_in_luma_samples-1, yCtb+y+j) (8-1200)

The classification filter index array filtIdx and the transpose index array transposeIdx are derived by the following ordered steps:

1. The variables filtH [x] [y] , filtV [x] [y] , filtD0 [x] [y] and filtD1 [x] [y] with x, y=-2.. CtbSizeY+1 are derived as follows:

– If both x and y are even numbers or both x and y are uneven numbers, the following applies:

filtH [x] [y] =Abs ( (recPicture [h _x, v _y] <<1) -recPicture [h _x-1, v _y] -recPicture [h _x+1, v _y] ) (8-1201)

filtV [x] [y] =Abs ( (recPicture [h _x, v _y] <<1) -recPicture [h _x, v _y-1] -recPicture [h _x, v _y+1] ) (8-1202)

filtD0 [x] [y] =Abs ( (recPicture [h _x, v _y] <<1) -recPicture [h _x-1, v _y-1] -recPicture [h _x+1, v _y ₊₁] ) (8-1203)

filtD1 [x] [y] =Abs ( (recPicture [h _x, v _y] <<1) -recPicture [h _x+1, v _y-1] -recPicture [h _x-1, v _y ₊₁] ) (8-1204)

– Otherwise, filtH [x] [y] , filtV [x] [y] , filtD0 [x] [y] and filtD1 [x] [y] are set equal to 0.

2. The variables minY, maxY and ac are derived as follows:

– If (y<<2) is equal to (min (CtbSizeY, 64) -8) [ [ (CtbSizeY-8) ] ] and (yCtb+CtbSizeY) is less than pic_height_in_luma_samples–1, minY is set equal to -2, maxY is set equal to 3 and ac is set equal to 96.

– Otherwise, if (y<<2) is equal to (min (CtbSizeY, 64) -4) [ [ (CtbSizeY-4) ] ] and (yCtb+CtbSizeY) is less than pic_height_in_luma_samples–1, minY is set equal to 0, maxY is set equal to 5 and ac is set equal to 96.

– Otherwise, minY is set equal to -2 and maxY is set equal to 5 and ac is set equal to 64.

3. The variables varTempH1 [x] [y] , varTempV1 [x] [y] , varTempD01 [x] [y] , varTempD11 [x] [y] and varTemp [x] [y] with x, y=0.. (CtbSizeY-1) >>2 are derived as follows:

sumH [x] [y] =Σ _iΣ _j filtH [h _(x<<2) +i-xCtb] [v _(y<<2) +j-yCtb] with i=-2.. 5, j=minY.. maxY (8-1205)

sumV [x] [y] =Σ _iΣ _j filtV [h _(x<<2) +i-xCtb] [v _(y<<2) +j-yCtb] with i=-2.. 5, j=minY.. maxY (8-1206)

sumD0 [x] [y] =Σ _iΣ _j filtD0 [h _(x<<2) +i-xCtb] [v _(y<<2) +j-yCtb] with i=-2.. 5, j=minY.. maxY (8-1207)

sumD1 [x] [y] =Σ _iΣ _j filtD1 [h _(x<<2) +i-xCtb] [v _(y<<2) +j-yCtb] with i=-2.. 5, j=minY.. maxY (8-1208)

sumOfHV [x] [y] =sumH [x] [y] +sumV [x] [y] (8-1209)

4. The variables dir1 [x] [y] , dir2 [x] [y] and dirS [x] [y] with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1 are derived as follows:

– The variables hv1, hv0 and dirHV are derived as follows:

…

– The variables d1, d0 and dirD are derived as follows:

…

5. The variable avgVar [x] [y] with x, y=0.. CtbSizeY-1 is derived as follows:

varTab [] = {0, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4} (8-1227)

avgVar [x] [y] =varTab [Clip3 (0, 15, (sumOfHV [x>>2] [y>>2] *ac) >> (3+BitDepth _Y) ) ] (8-1228)

6. The classification filter index array filtIdx [x] [y] and the transpose index array transposeIdx [x] [y] with x=y=0.. CtbSizeY-1 are derived as follows:

transposeTable [] = {0, 1, 0, 2, 2, 3, 1, 3}

transposeIdx [x] [y] =transposeTable [dir1 [x] [y] *2+ (dir2 [x] [y] >>1) ]

filtIdx [x] [y] =avgVar [x] [y]

When dirS [x] [y] is not equal 0, filtIdx [x] [y] is modified as follows:

filtIdx [x] [y] += ( ( (dir1 [x] [y] &0x1) <<1) +dirS [x] [y] ) *5 (8-1229)

5.5 Embodiment #5

For samples locate at multiple kinds of boundaries (e.g., slice/brick boundary, 360-degree virtual boundary) , the padding process is only invoked once. And how many lines to be padded per side is dependent on the location of current sample relative to the boundaries.

In one example, the ALF 2-side padding method is applied. Alternatively, furthermore, In the symmetric 2-side padding method, when a sample is at two boundaries, e.g., one boundary in the above side and one boundary in the below side, how many samples are padded is decided by the nearer boundary as shown in FIG. 27. Meanwhile, when deriving the classification information, only the 4 lines between the two boundaries in FIG. 27 are used.

FIG. 26 shows an example of the padding methods if 4 lines of samples are of two boundaries. In one example, the first boundary in FIG. 26 may be the ALF virtual boundary; the second boundary in FIG. 25 may be the slice/tile/brick boundary or the 360-degree virtual boundary.

FIG. 22 is a block diagram of a video processing apparatus 2200. The apparatus 2200 may be used to implement one or more of the methods described herein. The apparatus 2200 may be embodied in a smartphone, tablet, computer, Internet of Things (IoT) receiver, and so on. The apparatus 2200 may include one or more processors 2202, one or more memories 2204 and video processing hardware 2206. The processor (s) 2202 may be configured to implement one or more methods described in the present document. The memory (memories) 2204 may be used for storing data and code used for implementing the methods and techniques described herein. The video processing hardware 2206 may be used to implement, in hardware circuitry, some techniques described in the present document.

In some embodiments, the video coding methods may be implemented using an apparatus that is implemented on a hardware platform as described with respect to FIG. 22.

FIG. 23 is a flowchart of an example method 2300 of video processing. The method includes determining (2302) , for a conversion between a current video block of a video and a bitstream representation of the current video block, one or more interpolation filters to use during the conversion, wherein the one or more interpolation filters are from multiple interpolation filters for the video and performing (2304) the conversion using the one or more interpolation filters.

Various solutions and embodiments described in the present document are further described using a list of solutions.

Section 4, item 1 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

1. A method of video processing, comprising: performing a conversion between video blocks of a video picture and a bitstream representation thereof, wherein the video blocks are processed using logical groupings of coding tree blocks, wherein the coding tree blocks are processed based on whether a bottom boundary of a bottom coding tree block is outside a bottom boundary of the video picture.

2. The method of solution 1, wherein the processing the coding tree block includes performing an adaptive loop filtering of sample values of the coding tree block by using samples within the coding tree block.

3. The method of solution 1, wherein the processing the coding tree block includes performing an adaptive loop filtering of sample values of the coding tree block by disabling splitting the coding tree block into two parts according to virtual boundaries.

Section 4, item 2 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

4. A method of video processing, comprising: determining, based on a condition of a coding tree block of a current video block, a usage status of virtual samples during an in-loop filtering; and performing a conversion between the video block and a bitstream representation of the video block consistent with the usage status of virtual samples.

5. The method of solution 4, wherein, a logical true value of the usage status indicates that the current video block is split at least to two parts by a virtual boundary and filtering samples in one part is disallowed to utilize the information from another part.

6. The method of solution 4, wherein, a logical true value of the usage status indicates virtual samples are used during the in-loop filtering, and wherein the in-loop filtering is performed using modified values of reconstructed samples of the current video block.

7. The method of solution 4, wherein a logical false value of the usage status indicates that filtering samples in the block is allowed to utilize the information in the same block.

8. The method of solution 4, wherein, a logical true value of the usage status indicates the in-loop filtering is performed on reconstructed samples of the current video block without further modifying the reconstructed samples.

9. The method of any of solutions 4-8, wherein the condition specifies to set the usage status to the logical false value due to the coding tree block having a specific size.

10. The method of any of solutions 4-8, wherein the condition specifies to set the usage status to the logical false value due to the coding tree block having a size greater than a specific size.

11. The method of any of solutions 4-8tree block having a size less than a specific size.

Section 4, item 3 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

12. The method of solution 5, wherein the condition depends on whether a bottom boundary of the current video block is a bottom boundary of a video unit that is smaller than the video picture or the bottom boundary of the current video block is a virtual boundary.

13. The method of solution 12, wherein the condition depends on whether a bottom boundary of the current video block is a bottom boundary of a slice or tile or brick boundary.

14. The method of solution 12, wherein the condition specifies to set the usage status to the logical true value when the bottom boundary of the current video block is a bottom boundary of a slice or tile or brick boundary.

15. The method of solution 4-12, wherein the condition specifies to set the usage status to the logical false value when the bottom boundary of the current video block is a bottom boundary of a picture boundary or outside the bottom boundary of a picture boundary.

Section 4, item 4 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

16. A method of video processing, comprising: determining, during a conversion between a video picture that is logically grouped into one or more video slices or video bricks, and a bitstream representation of the video picture, to disable a use of samples in another slice or brick in the adaptive loop filter process; and performing the conversion consistent with the determining.

Section 4, item 5 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

17. A method of video processing, comprising: determining, during a conversion between a current video block of a video picture and a bitstream representation of the current video block, that the current video block includes samples located at a boundary of a video unit of the video picture; and performing the conversion based on the determining, wherein the performing the conversion includes generating virtual samples for an in-loop filtering process using a unified method that is same for all boundary types in the video picture.

18. The method of solution 17, wherein the video unit is a slice or tile or 360-degree video.

19. The method of solution 17, wherein the in-loop filtering includes adaptive loop filtering.

20. The method of any of solutions 17-19, wherein the unified method is a two-side padding method.

21. The method of any of solutions 17-20, wherein the unified method is when accessing samples below a first line is disallowed and padding is utilized to generate virtual samples for those below the first line, then accessing samples above a second line is also set to be disallowed and padding is utilized to generate virtual samples for those above the second line.

22. The method of any of solutions 17-20, wherein the unified method is when accessing samples above a first line is disallowed and padding is utilized to generate virtual samples for those above the first line, then accessing samples below a second line is also set to be disallowed and padding is utilized to generate virtual samples for those below the second line.

23. The method of any of solutions 21-22, wherein the distance between the first line and a current line where the current sample to be filtered is located and distance between the second line and the first line is equal.

Section 4, item 6 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

24. A method of video processing, comprising: determining to apply, during a conversion between a current video block of a video picture and a bitstream representation thereof, one of multiple adaptive loop filter (ALF) sample selection methods available for the video picture during the conversion; and performing the conversion by applying the one of multiple ALF sample selection methods.

25. The method of solution 24, wherein the multiple ALF sample selection methods include a first method in which samples are selected before an in-loop filter is applied to the current video block during the conversion and a second method in which samples are selected after an in-loop filter is applied to the current video block during the conversion.

Section 4, item 7 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

26. A method of video processing, comprising: performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule disables using samples that cross a virtual pipeline data unit (VPDU) of the video picture, and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

27. The method of solution 26, wherein the VPDU corresponds to a region of the video picture having a fixed size.

28. The method of any of solutions 26-27, wherein the boundary rule further specifies to use virtual samples for the in-loop filtering in place of disabled samples.

29. The method of solution 28, wherein the virtual samples are generated by padding.

Section 4, item 8 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

30. A method of video processing, comprising: performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies to use, for locations of the current video block across a video unit boundary, samples that are generated without using padding; and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

31. The method of solution 30, wherein the samples are generated using a two-side padding technique.

32. The method of solution 30, wherein the in-loop filtering operation comprises using a same virtual sample generation technique for symmetrically located samples during the in-loop filtering operation.

33. The method of any of solutions 30-32, wherein the in-loop filtering operation over samples of the current video block includes performing reshaping of the samples of the current video block prior to applying the in-loop filtering.

Section 4, item 9 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

34. A method of video processing, comprising: performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies selecting, for the in-loop filtering operation, a filter having dimensions such that samples of current video block used during the in-loop filtering do not cross a boundary of a video unit of the video picture; and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

Section 4, item 10 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

35. A method of video processing, comprising: performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule specifies selecting, for the in-loop filtering operation, clipping parameters or filter coefficients based on whether or not padded samples are needed for the in-loop filtering; and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

36. The method of solution 35, wherein the clipping parameters or filter coefficients are included in the bitstream representation.

Section 4, item 11 provides additional examples of the following solutions.

37. A method of video processing, comprising: performing, based on a boundary rule, an in-loop filtering operation over samples of a current video block of a video picture during a conversion between the current video block and a bitstream representation of a current video block; wherein the boundary rule depends on a color component identity of the current video block; and performing the conversion using a result of the in-loop filtering operation.

38. The method of solution 37, wherein the boundary rule is different for luma and/or different color components.

39. The method of any of solutions 1-38, wherein the conversion includes encoding the current video block into the bitstream representation.

40. The method of any of solutions 1-38, wherein the conversion includes decoding the bitstream representation to generate sample values of the current video block.

41. A video encoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in any one or more of solutions 1-38.

42. A video decoding apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in any one or more of solutions 1-38.

43. A computer-readable medium having code stored thereon, the code, upon execution by a processor, causing the processor to implement a method recited in any one or more of solutions 1-38.

FIG. 28 is a block diagram showing an example video processing system 2800 in which various techniques disclosed herein may be implemented. Various implementations may include some or all of the components of the system 2800. The system 2800 may include input 2802 for receiving video content. The video content may be received in a raw or uncompressed format, e.g., 8 or 10 bit multi-component pixel values, or may be in a compressed or encoded format. The input 2802 may represent a network interface, a peripheral bus interface, or a storage interface. Examples of network interface include wired interfaces such as Ethernet, passive optical network (PON) , etc. and wireless interfaces such as Wi-Fi or cellular interfaces.

The system 2800 may include a coding component 2804 that may implement the various coding or encoding methods described in the present document. The coding component 2804 may reduce the average bitrate of video from the input 2802 to the output of the coding component 2804 to produce a coded representation of the video. The coding techniques are therefore sometimes called video compression or video transcoding techniques. The output of the coding component 2804 may be either stored, or transmitted via a communication connected, as represented by the component 2806. The stored or communicated bitstream (or coded) representation of the video received at the input 2802 may be used by the component 2808 for generating pixel values or displayable video that is sent to a display interface 2810. The process of generating user-viewable video from the bitstream representation is sometimes called video decompression. Furthermore, while certain video processing operations are referred to as “coding” operations or tools, it will be appreciated that the coding tools or operations are used at an encoder and corresponding decoding tools or operations that reverse the results of the coding will be performed by a decoder.

Examples of a peripheral bus interface or a display interface may include universal serial bus (USB) or high definition multimedia interface (HDMI) or Displayport, and so on. Examples of storage interfaces include SATA (serial advanced technology attachment) , PCI, IDE interface, and the like. The techniques described in the present document may be embodied in various electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptops, smartphones or other devices that are capable of performing digital data processing and/or video display.

FIG. 29 is a flowchart representation of a method 2900 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 2900 includes, at operation 2910, determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a virtual boundary is enabled for a block within the picture for a filtering process based on a rule related to a relationship between a bottom boundary of the block and the picture. The method 2900 also includes, at operation 2920, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the rule defines that the relationship between the bottom boundary of the block and the picture is sufficient for the determining. In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is not a bottom boundary of the picture.

In some embodiments, rule specifies that the virtual boundary is disabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is a bottom boundary of the picture or is located outside of the picture. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block within the picture is not a bottom boundary of the picture. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is not a boundary of a video unit that is smaller than the picture. In some embodiments, the video unit comprises a slice, a tile, or a brick.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is a virtual boundary. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled for the filtering process despite that a syntax flag at a picture level indicates that virtual boundary usage is disabled. In some embodiments, the syntax flag comprises pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled for the filtering process despite that the bottom boundary of the block is same as a bottom boundary of the picture. In some embodiments, in case the virtual boundary is enabled for the coding tree block, the filtering process filters samples from above the virtual boundary of the block only.

FIG. 30 is a flowchart representation of a method 3000 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3000 includes, at operation 3010, determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, usage of virtual samples generated based on a padding process associated with a filtering process for a block within the picture based on a rule related to a dimension of the block. The method 3000 also includes, at operation 3020, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the usage of the virtual samples is related to whether a virtual boundary is enabled for the block. In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is always disabled in case the dimension of the block is K×L. In some embodiments, K = L = 4. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is always disabled in case the dimension of the block is equal to or smaller than K×L. In some embodiments, K = L = 8.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is disabled in case the dimension of the block is M×N, M and N being positive integers. In some embodiments, M =N = 4 or M = N = 8.

FIG. 31 is a flowchart representation of a method 3100 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3100 includes, at operation 3110, determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more video units and a bitstream representation of the video, to disable usage of samples across boundaries of the one or more video units in a filtering process. The bitstream representation is configured with a syntax flag that indicates that the usage is enabled. The method 3100 also includes, at operation 3820, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the one or more video units comprise a brick or a slice. In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the syntax flag is not applicable to the adaptive looping filtering process. In some embodiments, the syntax flag comprises loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag or loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag. In some embodiments, the syntax flag is applicable to a deblocking filter process or a sample adaptive offset (SAO) process. In some embodiments, the usage of samples comprises usage of virtual samples generated based on a padding process.

FIG. 32 is a flowchart representation of a method 3200 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3200 includes, at operation 3210, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a unified manner in which a padding process is applied for a filtering process according to a rule. The padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to boundaries of different video units. The method 3200 also includes, at operation 3220, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the different video units comprise a slice, a brick, a tile, a picture, or 360-degree video unit. In some embodiments, the boundaries of different video units comprise a virtual boundary or an actual boundary. In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the padding process is invoked only once for the filtering process. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the one or more virtual samples are generated based a symmetric padding manner for the in-loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that a number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined based on a second rule related to a location of the sample relative to at least one of the multiple boundaries. In some embodiments, the second rule is related to the location of the sample relative to all of the multiple boundaries. In some embodiments, the sample is located between two boundaries, and the second rule is related to distances between the sample and the two boundaries. In some embodiments, the second rule is related to a distance between the sample and a nearest boundary to the sample.

In some embodiments, the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined for each of the multiple boundaries, and a maximum number of lines is used for the conversion. In some embodiments, the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined for each side of the sample along a boundary. In some embodiments, the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located are determined jointly for both sides of the sample along a boundary.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the filtering process is disabled in case a number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is greater than a threshold. In some embodiments, the filtering process is disabled in case the number of lines on one side of the sample is greater than the threshold. In some embodiments, the filtering process is disabled in case the number of lines is on both sides of the sample is greater than the threshold.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the one or more virtual samples are located on both sides of the sample in case the adaptive loop filtering process is applied to the block. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the adaptive loop filtering process is disabled in case the sample is located at a first boundary between a second boundary and a third boundary of the multiple boundaries. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units and the in-loop filtering process is enabled for the block.

In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case a condition is satisfied. In some embodiments, the condition is satisfied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units and a syntax flag indicates that usage of samples across boundaries of the one or more video units in the filtering process is disallowed. In some embodiments, the syntax flag comprises pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag or loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag/loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag.

FIG. 33 is a flowchart representation of a method 3300 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3300 includes, at operation 3310, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a number of lines for which a padding process is applied in a filtering process according to a rule. The padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to at least two boundaries, the at least two boundaries comprising a virtual boundary and at least one other boundary. The rule is related to distances between the sample and the at least two boundaries. The method 3300 also includes, at operation 3320, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the filter process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the number of lines for each side of the sample is (M -min (D0, D1) ) . D0 represents a first distance between the sample and the virtual boundary and D1 represents a second distance between the sample and the at least one other boundary. M represents a number of lines from the virtual boundary to a bottom boundary of the block. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the number of lines for each side of the sample is (M -max(D0, D1) ) . D0 represents a first distance between the sample and the virtual boundary and D1 represents a second distance between the sample and the at least one other boundary. M represents a number of lines from the virtual boundary to a bottom boundary of the block.

FIG. 34 is a flowchart representation of a method 3400 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3400 includes, at operation 43410, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, (1) a first manner of selecting a first sample prior to applying one or more in-loop filtering process and (2) a second manner of selecting a second sample after applying the one or more in-loop filtering process and prior to applying an adaptive filtering process. The method 3400 also includes, at operation 3420, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the video unit comprises a coding tree block, a slice, or a brick. In some embodiments, the first manner of selecting the first sample and the second manner of selecting the second sample are based on locations of the first sample and the second sample. In some embodiments, the first manner specifies that a sample located at bottom boundary of the video unit is selected as the first sample in case the sample is used in the adaptive filtering process. In some embodiments, the second manner specifies that a sample not located at bottom boundary of the video unit is selected as the second sample in case the sample is used in the adaptive filtering process.

FIG. 35 is a flowchart representation of a method 3500 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3500 includes, at operation 3510, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, an order of applying multiple padding processes to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block for a filtering process. The method 3500 also includes, at operation 3520, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the block comprises a coding tree unit or a virtual pipeline data unit. In some embodiments, the video unit comprises a slice, a brick, or a sub-region of a picture. In some embodiments, the order specifies that a first padding process of the video unit is applied before a second padding process for virtual boundaries. In some embodiments, a first set of virtual samples along a single side of a sample of the block is generated in the first padding process. In some embodiments, a second set of virtual samples along both sides of a sample of the block is generated in the second padding process. In some embodiments, the first set of virtual samples is used in the second padding process to generate the second set of virtual samples.

In some embodiments, a boundary comprises a horizontal boundary between two regions within the picture. In some embodiments, a boundary comprises a vertical boundary between two regions within the picture. In some embodiments, the two regions comprise a sub-picture of the video.

FIG. 36 is a flowchart representation of a method 3600 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3600 includes, at operation 3610, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a sample of the block is positioned within a distance from a boundary of the block to be a boundary sample for a filtering process according to a rule associated with a component identity of the block. The method 3600 also includes, at operation 3620, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an in-loop filtering process or an adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the sample is a bottom boundary sample of the block in case a distance between the sample and a bottom boundary is smaller than a threshold T1 and the block is a luma block. In some embodiments, the rule specifies that the sample is a bottom boundary sample of the block in case a distance between the sample and the bottom boundary is smaller than a threshold T2 and the block is a chroma block. In some embodiments, T1 and T2 are different. In some embodiments, T1 and T2 are different in case a color format of the video is not 4: 4: 4.

FIG. 37 is a flowchart representation of a method 3700 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3700 includes, at operation 3710, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, that usage of samples across a boundary of a video unit of the video for a filtering process is disabled. The video comprises one or more video units and each of the one or more video units comprises one or more blocks. The method 3700 also includes, at operation 3720, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the video unit comprise a virtual pipeline data unit. In some embodiments, the video unit comprises a 64×64 region. In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an in-loop filtering process or an adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the boundary comprises a vertical boundary. In some embodiments, the boundary comprises a horizontal boundary. In some embodiments, a virtual boundary is enabled for the block in case the block comprises samples that are located close to the boundary of the video unit. In some embodiments, a sample required by the filtering process is replaced by a padding sample generated based on available samples within the video unit in case the sample is located outside of the boundary or below the virtual boundary. In some embodiments, a sample required by a classification step in the adaptive loop filtering process is replaced by a padding sample or a classification result determined based on available samples within the video unit in case the sample is located outside of the boundary or below the virtual boundary.

FIG. 38 is a flowchart representation of a method 3800 for video processing in accordance with the present technology. The method 3800 includes, at operation 3810, determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a manner of applying a filtering process to the block without using padding sample. The method 3800 also includes, at operation 3820, performing the conversion based on the determining.

In some embodiments, the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the manner specifies that reconstructed samples determined prior to any in-loop filtering process are used in the adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, for a current sample in the block, two reconstructed samples determined prior to any in-loop filtering process are used in the adaptive loop filter process, wherein each of the two reconstructed sample is positioned on a respective side of the current sample. In some embodiments, the two reconstructed samples are positioned symmetrically with respect to the current sample. In some embodiments, a second reconstructed sample is positioned at (x-i, y-j) in case the current sample is positioned at (x, y) and a first reconstructed sample is positioned at (x+i, y+j) , wherein x and y are non-negative integers, and wherein i and j are positive integers. In some embodiments, in case a reshaping step in which a component of the block is scaled is enabled, the reconstructed samples are selected from a domain converted from a reshaped domain.

In some embodiments, the manner specifies adjusting parameters or samples associated with the adaptive loop filtering process. In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises modifying filter coefficients associated with a current sample. In some embodiments, the modifying comprises setting the filter coefficients associated with the current sample to zero. In some embodiments, the modifying comprises setting a filter coefficient applicable to the current sample to be ( (1 << C_BD) -Sum) , wherein C_BD represents a bit-depth of the filter coefficient, and wherein Sum represents a sum of all coefficients applicable to samples that do not require padding samples.

In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises excluding samples that require padding samples. In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises adding filter coefficients of a first sample to filter coefficients of a second sample regardless of whether a non-linear filter is enabled or not. In some embodiments, the adjusting further comprises deriving a clipping parameter for the second sample. In some embodiments, the clipping parameter for the second sample is derived based on at least a decoded clipping parameter for the second sample. In some embodiments, the clipping parameter for the second sample is derived based on a function of a first decoded clipping parameter for the first sample and a second decoded clipping parameter for the second sample.

In some embodiments, the manner specifies that a first set of parameters associated with the filtering process for a first sample that do not require padding sample are different than a second set of parameters for a second sample that use padding samples. In some embodiments, the manner specifies the first set of parameters and the second set of parameters are different despite that the first sample and the second sample share a same class index. In some embodiments, parameters associated with the filtering process comprise clipping parameters, filter coefficients, or other parameters that support the filtering process. In some embodiments, the manner specifies that parameters associated with the filtering process are signaled in the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, the parameters are signaled at a coding tree unit level, a region level, a slice level, or a tile level. In some embodiments, the manner specifies that the first set of parameters is determined based on the second set of parameters.

In some embodiments, the manner specifies adjusting parameters associated with the filtering process for the current sample. In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises modifying filter coefficients associated with the current sample. In some embodiments, the modifying comprises setting the filter coefficients associated with the current sample to zero. In some embodiments, the modifying comprises setting a filter coefficient applicable to the current sample to be ( (1 << C_BD) -Sum) , wherein C_BD represents a bit-depth of the filter coefficient, and Sum represents a sum of all coefficients applicable to samples that do not require padding samples. In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises excluding samples that require padding samples. In some embodiments, the adjusting comprises adding filter coefficients of a first sample to filter coefficients of a second sample regardless of whether a non-linear filter is enabled or not. In some embodiments, the adjusting further comprises deriving a clipping parameter for the second sample. In some embodiments, the clipping parameter for the second sample is derived based on at least a decoded clipping parameter for the second sample. In some embodiments, the clipping parameter for the second sample is derived based on a function of a first decoded clipping parameter for the first sample and a second decoded clipping parameter for the second sample.

In some embodiments, the conversion includes encoding the video into the bitstream representation. In some embodiments, the conversion includes decoding the bitstream representation into the video.

From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the presently disclosed technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the presently disclosed technology is not limited except as by the appended claims.

Some embodiments of the disclosed technology include making a decision or determination to enable a video processing tool or mode. In an example, when the video processing tool or mode is enabled, the encoder will use or implement the tool or mode in the processing of a block of video, but may not necessarily modify the resulting bitstream based on the usage of the tool or mode. That is, a conversion from the block of video to the bitstream representation of the video will use the video processing tool or mode when it is enabled based on the decision or determination. In another example, when the video processing tool or mode is enabled, the decoder will process the bitstream with the knowledge that the bitstream has been modified based on the video processing tool or mode. That is, a conversion from the bitstream representation of the video to the block of video will be performed using the video processing tool or mode that was enabled based on the decision or determination.

Some embodiments of the disclosed technology include making a decision or determination to disable a video processing tool or mode. In an example, when the video processing tool or mode is disabled, the encoder will not use the tool or mode in the conversion of the block of video to the bitstream representation of the video. In another example, when the video processing tool or mode is disabled, the decoder will process the bitstream with the knowledge that the bitstream has not been modified using the video processing tool or mode that was enabled based on the decision or determination.

Implementations of the subject matter and the functional operations described in this patent document can be implemented in various systems, digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented as one or more computer program products, e.g., one or more modules of computer program instructions encoded on a tangible and non-transitory computer readable medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. The computer readable medium can be a machine-readable storage device, a machine-readable storage substrate, a memory device, a composition of matter effecting a machine-readable propagated signal, or a combination of one or more of them. The term “data processing unit” or “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers. The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, or a combination of one or more of them.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does not necessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document) , in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, or portions of code) . A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform functions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit) .

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory or a random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer are a processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Computer readable media suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of nonvolatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

It is intended that the specification, together with the drawings, be considered exemplary only, where exemplary means an example. As used herein, the use of “or” is intended to include “and/or” , unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

While this patent document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments of particular inventions. Certain features that are described in this patent document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the embodiments described in this patent document should not be understood as requiring such separation in all embodiments.

Only a few implementations and examples are described and other implementations, enhancements and variations can be made based on what is described and illustrated in this patent document.

Claims

A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, whether a virtual boundary is enabled for a block within the picture for a filtering process based on a rule related to a relationship between a bottom boundary of the block and the picture; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 1, wherein the rule defines that the relationship between the bottom boundary of the block and the picture is sufficient for the determining.
The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 3, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is not a bottom boundary of the picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 3, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is disabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is a bottom boundary of the picture or is located outside of the picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 3, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block within the picture is not a bottom boundary of the picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 3, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is not a boundary of a video unit that is smaller than the picture.
The method of claim 7, wherein the video unit comprises a slice, a tile, or a brick.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 8, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled in case the bottom boundary of the block is a virtual boundary.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 9, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled for the filtering process despite that a syntax flag at a picture level indicates that virtual boundary usage is disabled.
The method of claim 10, wherein the syntax flag comprises pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 9, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is enabled for the filtering process despite that the bottom boundary of the block is same as a bottom boundary of the picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 12, wherein, in case the virtual boundary is enabled for the coding tree block, the filtering process filters samples from above the virtual boundary of the block only.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more blocks and a bitstream representation of the video, usage of virtual samples generated based on a padding process associated with a filtering process for a block within the picture based on a rule related to a dimension of the block; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 14, wherein the usage of the virtual samples is related to whether a virtual boundary is enabled for the block.
The method of claim 14 or 15, wherein the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 14 to 16, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is always disabled in case the dimension of the block is K×L, K and L being positive integers.
The method of claim 17, wherein K = L = 4.
The method of any one or more of claims 14 to 16, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is always disabled in case the dimension of the block is equal to or smaller than K×L, K and L being positive integers.
The method of claim 19, wherein K = L = 8.
The method of any one or more of claims 14 to 16, wherein the rule specifies that the virtual boundary is disabled in case the dimension of the block is M×N, M and N being positive integers.
The method of claim 21, wherein M = N = 4 or M = N = 8.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a picture of a video that comprises one or more video units and a bitstream representation of the video, to disable usage of samples across boundaries of the one or more video units in a filtering process;

wherein the bitstream representation is configured with a syntax flag that indicates that the usage is enabled; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 23, wherein the one or more video units comprise a brick or a slice.
The method of claim 23 or 24, wherein the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 23 to 25, wherein the syntax flag is not applicable to the adaptive looping filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 23 to 26, wherein the syntax flag comprises loop_filter_across_bricks_enabled_flag or loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag.
The method of any one or more of claims 23 to 27, wherein the syntax flag is applicable to a deblocking filter process or a sample adaptive offset (SAO) process.
The method of any one or more of claims 23 to 28, wherein the usage of samples comprises usage of virtual samples generated based on a padding process.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a unified manner in which a padding process is applied for a filtering process according to a rule, wherein the padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to boundaries of different video units; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 30, wherein the different video units comprise a slice, a brick, a tile, a picture, or 360-degree video unit.
The method of claim 30, wherein the boundaries of different video units comprise a virtual boundary or an actual boundary.
The method of claim 30, wherein the filtering process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process or an in-loop filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 33, wherein the rule specifies that the padding process is invoked only once for the filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 34, wherein the rule specifies that the one or more virtual samples are generated based a symmetric padding manner for the in-loop filtering process.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 35, wherein the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 36, wherein the rule specifies that a number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined based on a second rule related to a location of the sample relative to at least one of the multiple boundaries.
The method of claim 37, wherein the second rule is related to the location of the sample relative to all of the multiple boundaries.
The method of claim 37, wherein the sample is located between two boundaries, and the second rule is related to distances between the sample and the two boundaries.
The method of claim 37, wherein the second rule is related to a distance between the sample and a nearest boundary to the sample.
The method of any one or more of claims 37 to 40, wherein the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined for each of the multiple boundaries, and a maximum number of lines is used for the conversion.
The method of any one or more of claims 37 to 41, wherein the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is determined for each side of the sample along a boundary.
The method of any one or more of claims 37 to 41, wherein the number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located are determined jointly for both sides of the sample along a boundary.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 43, wherein the rule specifies that the filtering process is disabled in case a number of lines in which the one or more virtual samples are located is greater than a threshold.
The method of claim 44, wherein the filtering process is disabled in case the number of lines on one side of the sample is greater than the threshold.
The method of claim 44, wherein the filtering process is disabled in case the number of lines is on both sides of the sample is greater than the threshold.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 46, wherein the rule specifies that the one or more virtual samples are located on both sides of the sample in case the adaptive loop filtering process is applied to the block.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 47, wherein the rule specifies that the adaptive loop filtering process is disabled in case the sample is located at a first boundary between a second boundary and a third boundary of the multiple boundaries.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 48, wherein the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units and the in-loop filtering process is enabled for the block.
The method of any one or more of claims 30 to 49, wherein the rule specifies that the padding process is applied in case a condition is satisfied.
The method of claim 50, wherein the condition is satisfied in case the sample is located at a bottom boundary of one of the one or more video units and a syntax flag indicates that usage of samples across boundaries of the one or more video units in the filtering process is disallowed.
The method of claim 51, wherein the syntax flag comprises pps_loop_filter_across_virtual_boundaries_disabled_flag or loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag/loop_filter_across_slices_enabled_flag.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a block of a video and a bitstream representation of the video, a number of lines for which a padding process is applied in a filtering process according to a rule, wherein the padding process is applied to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block that is located in proximity to at least two boundaries, the at least two boundaries comprising a virtual boundary and at least one other boundary, and wherein the rule is related to distances between the sample and the at least two boundaries; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 53, wherein the filter process comprises an adaptive loop filtering process.
The method of claim 53 or 54, wherein the rule specifies that the number of lines for each side of the sample is (M -min (D0, D1) ) , wherein D0 represents a first distance between the sample and the virtual boundary and D1 represents a second distance between the sample and the at least one other boundary, and wherein M represents a number of lines from the virtual boundary to a bottom boundary of the block.
The method of claim 53 or 54, wherein the rule specifies that the number of lines for each side of the sample is (M -max (D0, D1) ) , wherein D0 represents a first distance between the sample and the virtual boundary and D1 represents a second distance between the sample and the at least one other boundary, and wherein M represents a number of lines from the virtual boundary to a bottom boundary of the block.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, (1) a first manner of selecting a first sample prior to applying one or more in-loop filtering process and (2) a second manner of selecting a second sample after applying the one or more in-loop filtering process and prior to applying an adaptive filtering process; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 57, wherein the video unit comprises a coding tree block, a slice, or a brick.
The method of claim 57 or 58, wherein the first manner of selecting the first sample and the second manner of selecting the second sample are based on locations of the first sample and the second sample.
The method of claim 59, wherein the first manner specifies that a sample located at bottom boundary of the video unit is selected as the first sample in case the sample is used in the adaptive filtering process.
The method of claim 59, wherein the second manner specifies that a sample not located at bottom boundary of the video unit is selected as the second sample in case the sample is used in the adaptive filtering process.
A method of video processing, comprising:

determining, for a conversion between a block of a video of a video unit and a bitstream representation of the video, an order of applying multiple padding processes to generate one or more virtual samples for a sample of the block for a filtering process; and

performing the conversion based on the determining.
The method of claim 62, wherein the block comprises a coding tree unit or a virtual pipeline data unit.
The method of claim 62, wherein the video unit comprises a slice, a brick, or a sub-region of a picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 62 to 64, wherein the order specifies that a first padding process of the video unit is applied before a second padding process for virtual boundaries.
The method of claim 65, wherein a first set of virtual samples along a single side of a sample of the block is generated in the first padding process.
The method of claim 66, wherein a second set of virtual samples along both sides of a sample of the block is generated in the second padding process.
The method of claim 64 or 65, wherein the first set of virtual samples is used in the second padding process to generate the second set of virtual samples.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 66, wherein a boundary comprises a horizontal boundary between two regions within the picture.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 66, wherein a boundary comprises a vertical boundary between two regions within the picture.
The method of 69 or 70, wherein the two regions comprise a sub-picture of the video.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 71, wherein the conversion includes encoding the video into the bitstream representation.
The method of any one or more of claims 1 to 71, wherein the conversion includes decoding the bitstream representation into the video.
A video processing apparatus comprising a processor configured to implement a method recited in any one or more of claims 1 to 73.
A computer-readable medium having code stored thereon, the code, upon execution by a processor, causing the processor to implement a method recited in any one or more of claims 1 to 73.