WO2021067384A1 - Methods of treating animal proteins - Google Patents

Methods of treating animal proteins Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021067384A1
WO2021067384A1 PCT/US2020/053454 US2020053454W WO2021067384A1 WO 2021067384 A1 WO2021067384 A1 WO 2021067384A1 US 2020053454 W US2020053454 W US 2020053454W WO 2021067384 A1 WO2021067384 A1 WO 2021067384A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
animal
ppm
protein
limiting embodiments
protein sources
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2020/053454
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Jean-Michel NEBOUT
Luis Molina
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mars Inc
Original Assignee
Mars Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to CA3151388A priority Critical patent/CA3151388A1/en
Priority to AU2020357938A priority patent/AU2020357938A1/en
Priority to CN202080071586.4A priority patent/CN114554861A/en
Priority to MX2022003777A priority patent/MX2022003777A/en
Priority to BR112022005618A priority patent/BR112022005618A2/en
Priority to EP20872806.3A priority patent/EP4037488A4/en
Priority to US17/765,871 priority patent/US20220346406A1/en
Priority to KR1020227014873A priority patent/KR20220075409A/en
Application filed by Mars Inc filed Critical Mars Inc
Priority to JP2022515847A priority patent/JP2022550009A/en
Publication of WO2021067384A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021067384A1/en
Priority to ZA2022/03145A priority patent/ZA202203145B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Priority to JP2025161837A priority patent/JP2026004403A/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23JPROTEIN COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS; WORKING-UP PROTEINS FOR FOODSTUFFS; PHOSPHATIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS
    • A23J3/00Working-up of proteins for foodstuffs
    • A23J3/04Animal proteins
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23BPRESERVATION OF FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; CHEMICAL RIPENING OF FRUIT OR VEGETABLES
    • A23B4/00Preservation of meat, sausages, fish or fish products
    • A23B4/14Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12
    • A23B4/18Preserving with chemicals not covered by groups A23B4/02 or A23B4/12 in the form of liquids or solids
    • A23B4/24Inorganic compounds
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23JPROTEIN COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS; WORKING-UP PROTEINS FOR FOODSTUFFS; PHOSPHATIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR FOODSTUFFS
    • A23J1/00Obtaining protein compositions for foodstuffs; Bulk opening of eggs and separation of yolks from whites
    • A23J1/001Obtaining protein compositions for foodstuffs; Bulk opening of eggs and separation of yolks from whites from waste materials, e.g. kitchen waste
    • A23J1/002Obtaining protein compositions for foodstuffs; Bulk opening of eggs and separation of yolks from whites from waste materials, e.g. kitchen waste from animal waste materials
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/20Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin
    • A23K10/26Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin from waste material, e.g. feathers, bones or skin
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10Organic substances
    • A23K20/142Amino acids; Derivatives thereof
    • A23K20/147Polymeric derivatives, e.g. peptides or proteins

Definitions

  • animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated with one or more base components in order to advantageously increase preservation and reduce deterioration of the animal protein.
  • the animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used in combination with other components to form, for example, a pet food product.
  • Pet food products provide a widespread means for feeding pets. With respect to manufactured pet food products, there has been heightened demand to incorporate natural ingredients with increased freshness and quality while also providing the convenience of prolonged shelf life. Freshness and reduced fermentation of raw ingredients, such as meats and viscera, have been achieved in various ways, for example, by reducing the temperature of the components in order to freeze or chill them. Other known methods include acidifying or decreasing the pH of the raw materials. For example, commercial products which decrease pH in order to reduce or prevent the growth of bacteria and preserve the raw materials are readily available. Improving both the quality and freshness of dry and wet animal proteins used in such pet food products results in improved product performance with pets due to increased palatability.
  • the presently disclosed subject matter provides for processes for treating animal proteins.
  • Such treated proteins can be used in combination with other components to form pet food products. It was surprisingly and advantageously found that increasing the pH of animal proteins using a base component resulted in reduced fermentation as well as increased freshness and quality of such raw materials. By increasing the pH of the raw materials in accordance with the present disclosure, spoilage and fermentation of the same can be favorably reduced or prevented. Further, the quality of pet food can be increased by obtaining fresher raw material due to such treated animal proteins, for example, as indicated by levels of biogenic amines. This increase in quality can impact palatability and additionally advantageously impact any side effects caused by biogenic amines.
  • the present disclosure provides for methods of treating one or more protein sources.
  • the method can include adding one or more base components to the one or more protein sources.
  • the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of less than about 300 ppm.
  • the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm.
  • the present invention relates to a method of treating one or more protein sources, the method comprising adding one or more base components to the protein source, wherein the treated protein sources have a histamine level of less than about 300 ppm.
  • the base component can include sodium hydroxide (NaOH). In certain non-limiting embodiments, the base component is sodium hydroxide (NaOH) alone. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the sodium hydroxide can be present in an amount of from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt%.
  • the base component is added in the absence of the addition of an acid component.
  • the one or more protein sources can include animal protein, animal-derived protein, or combinations thereof.
  • the one or more protein sources can include viscera.
  • the treated animal proteins can have a pH of from about 5 to about 8. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal proteins can have a pH of from about 6 to about 7.
  • FIG. 1A depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating unground viscera with potassium hydroxide (KOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and with certain non-limiting embodiments.
  • Abscissa level of KOH, as expressed in wt%.
  • Ordinate amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm.
  • the amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape.
  • the pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
  • FIG. IB depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating ground viscera with potassium hydroxide (KOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and in with certain non-limiting embodiments.
  • Abscissa level of KOH, as expressed in wt%.
  • Ordinate amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm.
  • the amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape.
  • the pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
  • FIG. 2A depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating unground viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and certain non-limiting embodiments.
  • Abscissa level of KOH, as expressed in wt%.
  • Ordinate amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape.
  • the pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
  • FIG. 2B depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating ground viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and certain non-limiting embodiments.
  • Abscissa level of KOH, as expressed in wt%.
  • Ordinate amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape.
  • the pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
  • FIG. 3 depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating poultry meal including viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations and at various times in accordance with Example 2 and certain non limiting embodiments.
  • Each bar on the abscissa of the graph illustrates the amount of histamine (in mg/kg) for each of the mentioned conditions.
  • FIG. 4 depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating poultry meal including viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations and at various times in accordance with Example 2 and certain non limiting embodiments.
  • Each bar on the abscissa of the graph illustrates the amount of cadaverine (in mg/kg) for each of the mentioned conditions.
  • animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated with one or more base components. It was surprisingly and advantageously found that increasing the pH of animal proteins resulted in reduced or prevention of deterioration of the material.
  • the animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used in combination with other components to form, for example, a pet food product.
  • the term “about” or “approximately” means within an acceptable error range for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, which will depend in part on how the value is measured or determined, i.e., the limitations of the measurement system. For example, “about” can mean within three or more than three standard deviations, per the practice in the art. Alternatively, “about” can mean a range of up to 20%, preferably up to 10%, more preferably up to 5%, and more preferably still up to 1% of a given value. Also, particularly with respect to systems or processes, the term can mean within an order of magnitude, preferably within five-fold, and more preferably within two-fold, of a value.
  • animal or “pet” refers to animals including, but not limited to, dogs, cats, and the like. Domestic dogs and cats are particular non-limiting examples of animals or pets.
  • animal protein refers to animal-based sources of protein.
  • animal protein includes, for example without limitation, meat (for example, pork, beef, or veal), poultry (for example, chicken), fish, organs (for example, liver, spleen, or heart), viscera (for example, viscera of chicken or pork), and combinations thereof.
  • the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
  • the term “nutritionally complete” refers to pet food products that contain all known required nutrients for the intended recipient of the pet food product, in all appropriate amounts and proportions based, for example, on recommendations of recognized and competent authorities in the field of animal nutrition. Such foods are therefore capable of serving as a source of dietary intake to maintain life, without the addition of supplemental nutritional sources.
  • the term “nutritionally balanced”, as used herein, refers to pet food products that can be nutritionally complete. Alternatively, “nutritionally balanced”, as used herein, can refer to pet food products that are not nutritionally complete.
  • palatability refers to being desirable to the palate or taste. Further, the terms “palatability” or “palatable” as used herein refer to the extent to which a pet food product appeals to the palate or taste of an animal. This is suitable measured by feeding tests, e.g., difference tests or ranking tests. In certain embodiments, “palatability” can mean a relative preference for one food product over another. For example, when an animal shows a preference for one of two or more food products, the preferred food product is more “palatable”, and has “enhanced palatability” or “increased palatability”.
  • the relative palatability of one food product compared to one or more other food products can be determined, for example, in side-by-side, free-choice comparisons, e.g., by relative consumption of the food products, or other appropriate measures of preference indicative of palatability.
  • pet food or “pet food composition” refer to a composition intended for ingestion by an animal or pet.
  • Pet foods can include, without limitation, nutritionally balanced compositions suitable for daily feed as well as treats, which can be nutritionally balanced.
  • protein source refers to the source of animal protein, animal-derived protein, or combinations thereof.
  • viscera refers to intestines of the body. Viscera can additionally include other internal organs of the body, for example, the heart, stomach or lungs in natural proportions.
  • weight percent is meant to refer to the quantity by weight of a constituent or component, for example, in the pet food composition as a percentage of the overall weight of the pet food composition.
  • weight percent can also refer to the quantity by weight of a constituent or component, for example, in the hydrolysate composition as a percentage of the overall weight of the hydrolysate composition.
  • weight percent “wt-%,” “wt.%”, and “wt%” are used interchangeably.
  • animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated according to processes disclosed herein.
  • the pH of the animal proteins can be increased by one or more base components.
  • Such treatment surprisingly and advantageously provided for reduced deterioration and increased preservation characteristics of the animal proteins.
  • the one or more protein sources can include animal protein, animal-derived protein or combinations thereof.
  • the one or more protein sources can include animal protein sources such as chicken or pork.
  • the one or more protein sources can include, for example, trachea, kidney, liver, or viscera.
  • the term “protein” refers to one or more proteins suitably provided by one or more of the raw materials.
  • the protein may suitably be animal proteins, animal-derived proteins or any combination thereof.
  • Animal proteins include any protein of animal origin (including vertebrate and invertebrate proteins), e.g., proteins derived from mammals, fowl, fish and insects.
  • suitable animal proteins include those derived from chicken, turkey, beef, lamb, pork, venison, buffalo, duck, kangaroo, shell fish, crustaceans, salmon, tuna, whitefish, etc. They may suitably be derived from muscle meat, organs, tendons, bone, etc.
  • the proteins may be in any suitable form, e.g., isolated or partially isolated; concentrated; ground, etc.
  • the one or more protein sources can include one or more of pork trachea, pork kidney, poultry parts, chicken liver, chicken viscera, chicken necks, organs, turkey carcasses, or combinations thereof.
  • the one or more protein sources can include, for example, liver of chicken, turkey, pork, beef, lamb or fish.
  • a person of skill in the art will appreciate a wide variety of protein sources are suitable for use with the present disclosure.
  • the one or more protein sources can include animal viscera, for example, viscera of poultry.
  • animal viscera for example, viscera of poultry.
  • Such raw materials can be prone to fermentation and deterioration.
  • the state of the material can have an effect on the rate and occurrence of fermentation and deterioration.
  • ground viscera can be more prone to fermentation and deterioration as compared to native or unground viscera, for example, as enzymes in a ground viscera can be mixed with bacteria and the substrate.
  • the initial pH of the one or more protein sources can be from about 5 to about 7, from about 5 to about 6.5, or from about 5 to 6. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the initial pH of the one or more protein sources can be about 5, about 5.5, about 6, or about 6.5.
  • an initial pH of the one or more protein sources can vary, for example, depending on the raw material and its state (e.g., ground or unground).
  • the one or more protein sources can be cooled or chilled prior to treatment.
  • water can be at least partially removed from the one or more protein sources.
  • the one or more animal proteins can be mixed together.
  • the one or more protein sources can be treated with one or more base components.
  • the one or more base components can be used to increase the pH of the one or more protein sources.
  • the one or more base components can include any suitable base compound.
  • the one or more base components can include sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH).
  • base components include sodium hydroxide (NaOH) only.
  • the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.1 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.1 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 1.0 wt% or from about 0.1 wt% to about 0.5 wt%.
  • the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.25 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.25 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 1.0 wt% or from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt%.
  • the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.5 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.5 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 1.0 wt%.
  • the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of about 0.1% wt, about 0.25 wt%, about 0.5 wt%, about 0.75 wt%, about 1 wt%, about 1.2 wt%, about 1.4 wt%, about 1.5 wt%, or about 2 wt%.
  • the one or more base components include from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt% sodium hydroxide (NaOH). In certain embodiments, the one or more base components include from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) only.
  • the pH of the one or more protein sources after treatment can be in a range of from about 5.1 to about 8, from about 6 to about 7.8, from about 6.5 to about 7.5, or from about 6 to about 7.
  • the pH of the one or more protein sources after treatment can be about 6, about 6.5, about 7, about 7.2, about 7.5, or about 7.8.
  • the one or more base components can be applied to the one or more protein sources homogenously.
  • the one or more base components can be sprayed onto the one or more protein sources.
  • Protein sources treated in accordance with the present disclosure surprisingly and advantageously provide for reduced or prevented deterioration of the material.
  • By increasing the pH of the raw materials in accordance with the present disclosure spoilage and fermentation of the same can be favorably reduced or prevented.
  • the quality of pet food can be increased by obtaining fresher raw material by increasing the pH in accordance with methods of the present disclosure. Such quality can impact palatability and additionally advantageously impact any side effects caused by biogenic amines.
  • the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 0 ppm to about 500 ppm, from about 10 ppm to about 300 ppm, from about 100 ppm to about 200 ppm, from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm, or from about 10 ppm to about 150 ppm.
  • the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of about 0 ppm, about 10 ppm, about 15 ppm, about 50 ppm, about 100 ppm, about 125 ppm, about 150 ppm, about 200 ppm, about 250 ppm, about 275 ppm, about 300 ppm, or about 500 ppm.
  • the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of less than about 500 ppm, less than about 300 ppm, less than about 250 ppm, less than about 200 ppm, less than about 100 ppm, less than about 50 ppm, or less than about 25 ppm.
  • the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 0 mg/kg to about 200 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 100 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 90 mg/kg, or from about 10 mg/kg to about 50 mg/kg.
  • the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of about 0 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 10 mg/kg, about 15 mg/kg, about 25 mg/kg, about 50 mg/kg, about 100 mg/kg, about 125 mg/kg, about 150 mg/kg, or about 200 mg/kg.
  • the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of less than about 200 mg/kg, less than about 150 mg/kg, less than about 100 mg/kg, less than about 90 mg/kg, less than about 50 mg/kg, less than about 25 mg/kg, less than about 15 mg/kg, less than about 10 mg/kg, less than about 5 mg/kg, less than about 2 mg/kg or less than about 1 mg/kg.
  • a pet food composition is provided.
  • the pet food composition can include one or more treated animal proteins in accordance with the present disclosure and optionally one or more additional ingredients, for example, dry ingredients, liquid ingredients, or combinations thereof.
  • additional ingredients for example, dry ingredients, liquid ingredients, or combinations thereof.
  • a method of manufacturing pet food compositions is provided.
  • one or more dry ingredients can be mixed with one or more wet ingredients to form an emulsion or dough.
  • the emulsion or dough can be heated under pressure to a predetermined temperature and gradually cooled.
  • an emulsion can be formed which can be comminuted and heated to a predetermined temperature, and subsequently introduced into a processing zone. In the processing zone, the emulsion can be subjected to a predetermined pressure and discharged.
  • a slurry can be introduced to a scraped heat exchanger at a predetermined pressure and heated to produce a heat-treated product having a certain temperature.
  • one or more dry ingredients can be mixed with one or more wet ingredients, for example, water, to form a dough.
  • the dough can be cooked during extrusion under conditions of elevated temperature, pressure, or combination thereof.
  • the extruder can be provided with a die having a particular shape and the extrudate can be segmented into particles or pieces as the product is extruded.
  • Animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used as raw materials along with other components to form a pet food product.
  • the pet food composition can be used alone as a pet food product or in combination with other components to form a mixed pet food product.
  • Any suitable pet food application can be used with the animal proteins of the present disclosure.
  • animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be suitable for use in dry, wet such as loaf or chunk in gravy, treats, bakery, or pillow-related pet food products.
  • Analytical method for biogenic amine profile The principle consists in an acid extraction of the biogenic amines and the determination by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) after o-Phthaldialdehyde (OP A) post-column derivatization. This protocol is adapted from AO AC International (Association of Official Analytical Chemists - International) volume 78, n°4, 1995 and AO AC International volume 81, n°5, 1998.
  • AO AC International Association of Official Analytical Chemists - International
  • the limit of quantification in the matrices is 2 mg/kg for histamine and 5 mg/kg for all the other biogenic amine.
  • Analytical method for hexanal The principle consists in extracting the hexanal by using a Static Headspace extraction then analyzing by gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection (GC-FID) using an internal quantification.
  • GC-FID flame-ionization detection
  • EXAMPLE 1 Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Pre- Treatment Testing of Viscera (Varied final Concentrations)
  • KOH potassium hydroxide
  • NaOH sodium hydroxide
  • KOH pre treatment was tested at a final concentration of 0 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 1.4 wt% and 1.5 wt% for unground animal viscera and at a final concentration of 0 wt%, 0.75 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 1.4 wt% and 1.5 wt% for ground animal viscera.
  • Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pre treatment was tested at the following final concentrations 0 wt%, 0.25 wt%, 0.5 wt% and 1 wt% for unground animal viscera and at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1 wt% and 1.5 wt% for ground animal viscera.
  • the level of histamine (ppm) and pH were measured for all samples. Histamine is a by-product from amino acid fermentation (histidine) can be used as a tracer of biogenic amines. A lower the level of histamine can indicate a fresher raw material.
  • EXAMPLE 2 Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Pre-Treatment Testing (0.25 wt% and 0.5 wt% NaOH) of Poultry Meal Including Viscera
  • Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was tested in the pre-treatment of animal protein, i.e., poultry meal, at final concentrations of 0 wt%, 0.25 wt%, and 0.5 wt% over a period of time.
  • the level of histamine (mg/kg) was measured at 1 hour, 5 hours, 12 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, and 30 hours for each final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pre-treatment. Viscera from standard chickens was removed from the slaughterhouse directly after conveying and screening.
  • a homogeneous mixture of fresh viscera was separated into three containers with identical weights (i.e., “Control”; “NaOH added at 0.25 wt%”; and “NaOH added at 0.5 wt%”) promptly after slaughtering.
  • soda at 80% by mass was added to each of the three containers.
  • the three containers were then hand blended for 30 seconds.
  • the containers were placed in a controlled room maintained at 20 °C for the duration of the testing. Samples were taken at the same time point (T0-T5) from each of the three containers as provided in Table 3 and stored immediately in a freezer. A total of 16 samples were tested.
  • Control was tested at TO and all three containers (Control, 0.25 wt% NaOH, and 0.5 wt% NaOH) were tested at T1-T5. Agitation was performed on each container before each intermediate sampling step. After 30 hours of storage, all samples were dehydrated in the oven at 115°C for 24 hours prior to testing for hexanal (oxidation), biogenic amines, and sodium.
  • results of hexanal, sodium, and biogenic amines testing are provided in Table 4.
  • results of histamine levels (mg/kg) are provided in FIG. 3.
  • results of cadaverine levels (mg/kg) are provided in FIG. 4.
  • sodium hydroxide (NaOH) can be used to preserve animal protein.
  • Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.5 wt% was more efficient in preservation of the animal protein and impacted the pH of the animal protein more as compared to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%.
  • the higher final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at 0.5 wt% increased the pH of the material to a more basic level as compared to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%.
  • the histamine level of the material decreased in correlation with an increasing final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), i.e., from 0 wt%, 0.25 wt% to 0.5 wt%.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)

Abstract

The presently disclosed subject matter provides methods of treating animal proteins and pet food products including the same. Methods include treating animal proteins with one or more base compounds to increase the pH thereof to provide for increased preservation and the reduction of spoilage of the animal protein.

Description

METHODS OF TREATING ANIMAL PROTEINS
1. FIELD
[0001] The presently disclosed subject matter relates to animal proteins and processes for treating the same. Specifically, animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated with one or more base components in order to advantageously increase preservation and reduce deterioration of the animal protein. The animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used in combination with other components to form, for example, a pet food product.
2. BACKGROUND
[0002] Pet food products provide a widespread means for feeding pets. With respect to manufactured pet food products, there has been heightened demand to incorporate natural ingredients with increased freshness and quality while also providing the convenience of prolonged shelf life. Freshness and reduced fermentation of raw ingredients, such as meats and viscera, have been achieved in various ways, for example, by reducing the temperature of the components in order to freeze or chill them. Other known methods include acidifying or decreasing the pH of the raw materials. For example, commercial products which decrease pH in order to reduce or prevent the growth of bacteria and preserve the raw materials are readily available. Improving both the quality and freshness of dry and wet animal proteins used in such pet food products results in improved product performance with pets due to increased palatability.
[0003] Accordingly, there has been ongoing consumer demand for manufactured pet food products including raw ingredients having both a high level of freshness and quality and for methods to produce the same. A need has continually existed for ingredients that maintain integrity during processing, and which can enhance the palatability of pet food products. The presently disclosed subject matter addresses these and other needs.
3. SUMMARY [0004] The presently disclosed subject matter provides for processes for treating animal proteins. Such treated proteins can be used in combination with other components to form pet food products. It was surprisingly and advantageously found that increasing the pH of animal proteins using a base component resulted in reduced fermentation as well as increased freshness and quality of such raw materials. By increasing the pH of the raw materials in accordance with the present disclosure, spoilage and fermentation of the same can be favorably reduced or prevented. Further, the quality of pet food can be increased by obtaining fresher raw material due to such treated animal proteins, for example, as indicated by levels of biogenic amines. This increase in quality can impact palatability and additionally advantageously impact any side effects caused by biogenic amines.
[0005] The present disclosure provides for methods of treating one or more protein sources. The method can include adding one or more base components to the one or more protein sources. The treated protein sources can have a histamine level of less than about 300 ppm. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm. According to one of its aspects, the present invention relates to a method of treating one or more protein sources, the method comprising adding one or more base components to the protein source, wherein the treated protein sources have a histamine level of less than about 300 ppm.
[0006] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the base component can include sodium hydroxide (NaOH). In certain non-limiting embodiments, the base component is sodium hydroxide (NaOH) alone. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the sodium hydroxide can be present in an amount of from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt%.
[0007] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the base component is added in the absence of the addition of an acid component.
[0008] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can include animal protein, animal-derived protein, or combinations thereof. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can include viscera.
[0009] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal proteins can have a pH of from about 5 to about 8. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal proteins can have a pH of from about 6 to about 7.
[0010] The foregoing has outlined broadly the features and technical advantages of the present application in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the application will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the application. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present application. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the application as set forth in the appended claims. The novel features which are believed to be characteristic of the application, both as to its organization and method of operation, together with further objects and advantages will be better understood from the following description.
4. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIG. 1A depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating unground viscera with potassium hydroxide (KOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and with certain non-limiting embodiments. Abscissa: level of KOH, as expressed in wt%. Ordinate: amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape. The pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
[0012] FIG. IB depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating ground viscera with potassium hydroxide (KOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and in with certain non-limiting embodiments. Abscissa: level of KOH, as expressed in wt%. Ordinate: amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape. The pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
[0013] FIG. 2A depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating unground viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and certain non-limiting embodiments. Abscissa: level of KOH, as expressed in wt%. Ordinate: amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape. The pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape;
[0014] FIG. 2B depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating ground viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations in accordance with Example 1 and certain non-limiting embodiments. Abscissa: level of KOH, as expressed in wt%. Ordinate: amount of histamine, as expressed in ppm. The amount of histamine (in ppm) is represented by the curve with the diamond shape. The pH value is represented by the curve with the square shape; [0015] FIG. 3 depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating poultry meal including viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations and at various times in accordance with Example 2 and certain non limiting embodiments. Each bar on the abscissa of the graph illustrates the amount of histamine (in mg/kg) for each of the mentioned conditions. Ordinate: amount of histamine in mg/kg; and [0016] FIG. 4 depicts a graph illustrating the results of preservation testing by treating poultry meal including viscera with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) as a base component at varying final concentrations and at various times in accordance with Example 2 and certain non limiting embodiments. Each bar on the abscissa of the graph illustrates the amount of cadaverine (in mg/kg) for each of the mentioned conditions. Ordinate: amount of cadaverine, as expressed in mg/kg.
5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] The presently disclosed subject matter relates to animal proteins and processes for treating the same. Specifically, animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated with one or more base components. It was surprisingly and advantageously found that increasing the pH of animal proteins resulted in reduced or prevention of deterioration of the material. The animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used in combination with other components to form, for example, a pet food product. These and other aspects of the disclosed subject matter are discussed in further detail below.
[0018] For clarity and not by way of limitation, this detailed description is divided into the following sub-portions:
[0019] 5.1. Definitions;
[0020] 5.2. Animal protein sources;
[0021] 5.3. Pet food compositions;
[0022] 5.4. Methods of making pet food compositions; and
[0023] 5.5. Applications.
5.1. Definitions
[0024] The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of this subj ect matter and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms are defined below to provide additional guidance in describing the compositions and methods of the disclosed subject matter and how to make and use them. [0025] As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a compound” includes mixtures of compounds.
[0026] The term “about” or “approximately” means within an acceptable error range for the particular value as determined by one of ordinary skill in the art, which will depend in part on how the value is measured or determined, i.e., the limitations of the measurement system. For example, “about” can mean within three or more than three standard deviations, per the practice in the art. Alternatively, “about” can mean a range of up to 20%, preferably up to 10%, more preferably up to 5%, and more preferably still up to 1% of a given value. Also, particularly with respect to systems or processes, the term can mean within an order of magnitude, preferably within five-fold, and more preferably within two-fold, of a value.
[0027] As used herein, the terms “animal” or “pet” refers to animals including, but not limited to, dogs, cats, and the like. Domestic dogs and cats are particular non-limiting examples of animals or pets.
[0028] As used herein, the term “animal protein” refers to animal-based sources of protein. Such animal protein includes, for example without limitation, meat (for example, pork, beef, or veal), poultry (for example, chicken), fish, organs (for example, liver, spleen, or heart), viscera (for example, viscera of chicken or pork), and combinations thereof.
[0029] As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. [0030] As used herein, the term “nutritionally complete” refers to pet food products that contain all known required nutrients for the intended recipient of the pet food product, in all appropriate amounts and proportions based, for example, on recommendations of recognized and competent authorities in the field of animal nutrition. Such foods are therefore capable of serving as a source of dietary intake to maintain life, without the addition of supplemental nutritional sources. The term “nutritionally balanced”, as used herein, refers to pet food products that can be nutritionally complete. Alternatively, “nutritionally balanced”, as used herein, can refer to pet food products that are not nutritionally complete.
[0031] As used herein, the terms “palatability” or “palatable” refer to being desirable to the palate or taste. Further, the terms “palatability” or “palatable” as used herein refer to the extent to which a pet food product appeals to the palate or taste of an animal. This is suitable measured by feeding tests, e.g., difference tests or ranking tests. In certain embodiments, “palatability” can mean a relative preference for one food product over another. For example, when an animal shows a preference for one of two or more food products, the preferred food product is more “palatable”, and has “enhanced palatability” or “increased palatability”. In certain embodiments, the relative palatability of one food product compared to one or more other food products can be determined, for example, in side-by-side, free-choice comparisons, e.g., by relative consumption of the food products, or other appropriate measures of preference indicative of palatability.
[0032] As used interchangeably herein, the terms “pet food” or “pet food composition” refer to a composition intended for ingestion by an animal or pet. Pet foods can include, without limitation, nutritionally balanced compositions suitable for daily feed as well as treats, which can be nutritionally balanced.
[0033] As used herein, the term “protein source” refers to the source of animal protein, animal-derived protein, or combinations thereof.
[0034] As used herein, the term “viscera” refers to intestines of the body. Viscera can additionally include other internal organs of the body, for example, the heart, stomach or lungs in natural proportions.
[0035] As used herein, the term “weight percent” is meant to refer to the quantity by weight of a constituent or component, for example, in the pet food composition as a percentage of the overall weight of the pet food composition. The term “weight percent” can also refer to the quantity by weight of a constituent or component, for example, in the hydrolysate composition as a percentage of the overall weight of the hydrolysate composition. The terms “weight percent,” “wt-%,” “wt.%”, and “wt%” are used interchangeably.
5.2. Methods of Treating Animal Proteins
[0036] In certain non-limiting embodiments, animal proteins of the present disclosure can be treated according to processes disclosed herein. In particular embodiments, the pH of the animal proteins can be increased by one or more base components. Such treatment surprisingly and advantageously provided for reduced deterioration and increased preservation characteristics of the animal proteins.
[0037] Animal Protein Sources
[0038] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can include animal protein, animal-derived protein or combinations thereof. The one or more protein sources can include animal protein sources such as chicken or pork. The one or more protein sources can include, for example, trachea, kidney, liver, or viscera. When used herein, the term “protein” refers to one or more proteins suitably provided by one or more of the raw materials. The protein may suitably be animal proteins, animal-derived proteins or any combination thereof. Animal proteins include any protein of animal origin (including vertebrate and invertebrate proteins), e.g., proteins derived from mammals, fowl, fish and insects. Examples of suitable animal proteins include those derived from chicken, turkey, beef, lamb, pork, venison, buffalo, duck, kangaroo, shell fish, crustaceans, salmon, tuna, whitefish, etc. They may suitably be derived from muscle meat, organs, tendons, bone, etc. The proteins may be in any suitable form, e.g., isolated or partially isolated; concentrated; ground, etc. For example, and not by way of limitation, the one or more protein sources can include one or more of pork trachea, pork kidney, poultry parts, chicken liver, chicken viscera, chicken necks, organs, turkey carcasses, or combinations thereof. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can include, for example, liver of chicken, turkey, pork, beef, lamb or fish. A person of skill in the art will appreciate a wide variety of protein sources are suitable for use with the present disclosure.
[0039] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can include animal viscera, for example, viscera of poultry. Such raw materials can be prone to fermentation and deterioration. Further, the state of the material can have an effect on the rate and occurrence of fermentation and deterioration. For example, ground viscera can be more prone to fermentation and deterioration as compared to native or unground viscera, for example, as enzymes in a ground viscera can be mixed with bacteria and the substrate.
[0040] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the initial pH of the one or more protein sources can be from about 5 to about 7, from about 5 to about 6.5, or from about 5 to 6. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the initial pH of the one or more protein sources can be about 5, about 5.5, about 6, or about 6.5. A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate an initial pH of the one or more protein sources can vary, for example, depending on the raw material and its state (e.g., ground or unground).
[0041] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can be cooled or chilled prior to treatment. In certain non-limiting embodiments, water can be at least partially removed from the one or more protein sources. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more animal proteins can be mixed together.
[0042] Base Components
[0043] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more protein sources can be treated with one or more base components. The one or more base components can be used to increase the pH of the one or more protein sources. The one or more base components can include any suitable base compound. A person skilled in the art will appreciate that a wide variety of base components are suitable for use with the present disclosure. In certain embodiments, the one or more base components can include sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH). In certain embodiments, base components include sodium hydroxide (NaOH) only. [0044] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.1 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.1 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.1 wt% to about 1.0 wt% or from about 0.1 wt% to about 0.5 wt%. In further non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.25 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.25 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.25 wt% to about 1.0 wt% or from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt%. In still further non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of from about 0.5 wt% to about 5 wt%, from about 0.5 wt% to about 4 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 3 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 2 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 1.5 wt%; from about 0.5 wt% to about 1.0 wt%. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components can be added to the one or more protein sources at a final concentration of about 0.1% wt, about 0.25 wt%, about 0.5 wt%, about 0.75 wt%, about 1 wt%, about 1.2 wt%, about 1.4 wt%, about 1.5 wt%, or about 2 wt%.
[0045] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components include from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt% sodium hydroxide (NaOH). In certain embodiments, the one or more base components include from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt% sodium hydroxide (NaOH) only.
[0046] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the pH of the one or more protein sources after treatment can be in a range of from about 5.1 to about 8, from about 6 to about 7.8, from about 6.5 to about 7.5, or from about 6 to about 7. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the pH of the one or more protein sources after treatment can be about 6, about 6.5, about 7, about 7.2, about 7.5, or about 7.8. [0047] The one or more base components can be applied to the one or more protein sources homogenously. For example, in certain non-limiting embodiments, the one or more base components can be sprayed onto the one or more protein sources.
[0048] Features of Treated Protein Sources
[0049] Protein sources treated in accordance with the present disclosure surprisingly and advantageously provide for reduced or prevented deterioration of the material. By increasing the pH of the raw materials in accordance with the present disclosure, spoilage and fermentation of the same can be favorably reduced or prevented. Further, the quality of pet food can be increased by obtaining fresher raw material by increasing the pH in accordance with methods of the present disclosure. Such quality can impact palatability and additionally advantageously impact any side effects caused by biogenic amines.
[0050] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 0 ppm to about 500 ppm, from about 10 ppm to about 300 ppm, from about 100 ppm to about 200 ppm, from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm, or from about 10 ppm to about 150 ppm. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of about 0 ppm, about 10 ppm, about 15 ppm, about 50 ppm, about 100 ppm, about 125 ppm, about 150 ppm, about 200 ppm, about 250 ppm, about 275 ppm, about 300 ppm, or about 500 ppm. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of less than about 500 ppm, less than about 300 ppm, less than about 250 ppm, less than about 200 ppm, less than about 100 ppm, less than about 50 ppm, or less than about 25 ppm.
[0051] In certain non-limiting embodiments, the treated protein sources can have a histamine level of from about 0 mg/kg to about 200 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 100 mg/kg to about 150 mg/kg, from about 10 mg/kg to about 90 mg/kg, or from about 10 mg/kg to about 50 mg/kg. In particular non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of about 0 mg/kg, about 1 mg/kg, about 5 mg/kg, about 10 mg/kg, about 15 mg/kg, about 25 mg/kg, about 50 mg/kg, about 100 mg/kg, about 125 mg/kg, about 150 mg/kg, or about 200 mg/kg. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the treated animal protein can have a histamine level of less than about 200 mg/kg, less than about 150 mg/kg, less than about 100 mg/kg, less than about 90 mg/kg, less than about 50 mg/kg, less than about 25 mg/kg, less than about 15 mg/kg, less than about 10 mg/kg, less than about 5 mg/kg, less than about 2 mg/kg or less than about 1 mg/kg.
[0052] Methods for measuring the amount of histamine, other biogenic amines such as putrescine, cadaverine, spermine, spermidine, tyramine, tryptamine, 2-phenylethylamine, serotonin or agmatine, and hexanal are well known to one skilled in the art. Examples of methods for measuring these amounts are also disclosed in the experimental part herein.
5.3. Pet Food Compositions
[0053] In certain non-limiting embodiments, a pet food composition is provided. The pet food composition can include one or more treated animal proteins in accordance with the present disclosure and optionally one or more additional ingredients, for example, dry ingredients, liquid ingredients, or combinations thereof. A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate a wide variety of pet food compositions are suitable for use with the present disclosure.
5.4. Methods of Making Pet Food Compositions
[0054] In certain non-limiting embodiments, a method of manufacturing pet food compositions is provided. In certain non-limiting embodiments, one or more dry ingredients can be mixed with one or more wet ingredients to form an emulsion or dough. The emulsion or dough can be heated under pressure to a predetermined temperature and gradually cooled. Alternatively, an emulsion can be formed which can be comminuted and heated to a predetermined temperature, and subsequently introduced into a processing zone. In the processing zone, the emulsion can be subjected to a predetermined pressure and discharged. For producing a chunk-like product, alternatively, a slurry can be introduced to a scraped heat exchanger at a predetermined pressure and heated to produce a heat-treated product having a certain temperature. In certain non-limiting embodiments, one or more dry ingredients can be mixed with one or more wet ingredients, for example, water, to form a dough. The dough can be cooked during extrusion under conditions of elevated temperature, pressure, or combination thereof. The extruder can be provided with a die having a particular shape and the extrudate can be segmented into particles or pieces as the product is extruded.
[0055] A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate a wide variety of methods of manufacturing pet food compositions are suitable for use with the present disclosure.
5.5. Applications
[0056] Animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be used as raw materials along with other components to form a pet food product. In certain non-limiting embodiments, the pet food composition can be used alone as a pet food product or in combination with other components to form a mixed pet food product. Any suitable pet food application can be used with the animal proteins of the present disclosure. For example, and not by way of limitation, animal proteins treated in accordance with the present disclosure can be suitable for use in dry, wet such as loaf or chunk in gravy, treats, bakery, or pillow-related pet food products.
6. EXAMPLES
[0057] The following examples are merely illustrative of the presently disclosed subject matter and they should not be considered as limiting the scope of the subject matter in any way. [0058] In the examples below, the amount of histamine, tyramine, putrescine, cadaverine, serotonin, phenylethylalamine, spermidine, spermine, tryptamine, and hexanal was measured as follows.
Analytical method for biogenic amine profile: The principle consists in an acid extraction of the biogenic amines and the determination by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) after o-Phthaldialdehyde (OP A) post-column derivatization. This protocol is adapted from AO AC International (Association of Official Analytical Chemists - International) volume 78, n°4, 1995 and AO AC International volume 81, n°5, 1998. The expanded [k=2] uncertainty for histamine, tyramine, putrescine, cadaverine is:
- value > 10 mg/kg: 30 % of the value,
- value < 10 mg/kg: 40 % of the value with a minimum at 5 mg/kg (2 mg/kg for histamine). The expanded [k=2] uncertainty for serotonin is:
- 50 % of the value
The limit of quantification in the matrices is 2 mg/kg for histamine and 5 mg/kg for all the other biogenic amine.
Analytical method for hexanal: The principle consists in extracting the hexanal by using a Static Headspace extraction then analyzing by gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection (GC-FID) using an internal quantification.
The expanded [k=2] uncertainty for hexanal is 40 %.
EXAMPLE 1: Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Pre- Treatment Testing of Viscera (Varied final Concentrations)
[0059] Two base compounds, potassium hydroxide (KOH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), were each tested at different final concentrations in the pre-treatment of animal viscera. Animal viscera was tested both in ground and unground states. Potassium hydroxide (KOH) pre treatment was tested at a final concentration of 0 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 1.4 wt% and 1.5 wt% for unground animal viscera and at a final concentration of 0 wt%, 0.75 wt%, 1 wt%, 1.2 wt%, 1.4 wt% and 1.5 wt% for ground animal viscera. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pre treatment was tested at the following final concentrations 0 wt%, 0.25 wt%, 0.5 wt% and 1 wt% for unground animal viscera and at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%, 0.5 wt%, 1 wt% and 1.5 wt% for ground animal viscera. The level of histamine (ppm) and pH were measured for all samples. Histamine is a by-product from amino acid fermentation (histidine) can be used as a tracer of biogenic amines. A lower the level of histamine can indicate a fresher raw material.
[0060] The results of the potassium hydroxide (KOH) pre-treatment of animal viscera are provided in Table 1A (unground) and Table IB (ground), which correspond to FIG. 1A (unground) and FIG. IB (ground), respectively. The results for sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pre-treatment of animal viscera are provided in Table 2A (unground) and Table 2B (ground), which correspond to FIG. 2A (unground) and FIG. 2B (ground), respectively.
Table 1A. KOH Treatment (Unground)
Figure imgf000014_0001
Table IB. KOH Treatment (Ground)
Table 2A. NaOH Treatment (Unground)
Figure imgf000014_0002
Table 2B. NaOH Treatment (Ground)
Figure imgf000015_0001
[0061] As shown in Tables 1 A-1B and 2A-2B and FIGS. 1 A-1B and 2A-2B, pre-treatment of animal viscera (ground or unground) with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was more efficient than pre-treatment with potassium hydroxide (KOH). In both unground and ground animal viscera, pre-treatment with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) increased the pH level of the material and lowered levels of histamine.
EXAMPLE 2: Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) Pre-Treatment Testing (0.25 wt% and 0.5 wt% NaOH) of Poultry Meal Including Viscera
[0062] Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was tested in the pre-treatment of animal protein, i.e., poultry meal, at final concentrations of 0 wt%, 0.25 wt%, and 0.5 wt% over a period of time. The level of histamine (mg/kg) was measured at 1 hour, 5 hours, 12 hours, 20 hours, 24 hours, and 30 hours for each final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pre-treatment. Viscera from standard chickens was removed from the slaughterhouse directly after conveying and screening. A homogeneous mixture of fresh viscera was separated into three containers with identical weights (i.e., “Control”; “NaOH added at 0.25 wt%”; and “NaOH added at 0.5 wt%”) promptly after slaughtering. Approximately 1 hour after collection, soda at 80% by mass was added to each of the three containers. The three containers were then hand blended for 30 seconds. The containers were placed in a controlled room maintained at 20 °C for the duration of the testing. Samples were taken at the same time point (T0-T5) from each of the three containers as provided in Table 3 and stored immediately in a freezer. A total of 16 samples were tested. The Control was tested at TO and all three containers (Control, 0.25 wt% NaOH, and 0.5 wt% NaOH) were tested at T1-T5. Agitation was performed on each container before each intermediate sampling step. After 30 hours of storage, all samples were dehydrated in the oven at 115°C for 24 hours prior to testing for hexanal (oxidation), biogenic amines, and sodium.
Table 3. Sampling Procedure
Figure imgf000016_0003
[0063] The results of hexanal, sodium, and biogenic amines testing are provided in Table 4. The results of histamine levels (mg/kg) are provided in FIG. 3. The results of cadaverine levels (mg/kg) are provided in FIG. 4.
Table 4.
Figure imgf000016_0001
Table 4. (cont.)
Figure imgf000016_0002
Figure imgf000017_0001
[0064] As shown in Table 4 and FIG. 3 providing the results of histamine levels (mg/kg), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) can be used to preserve animal protein. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.5 wt% was more efficient in preservation of the animal protein and impacted the pH of the animal protein more as compared to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%. The higher final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at 0.5 wt% increased the pH of the material to a more basic level as compared to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) at a final concentration of 0.25 wt%. As shown in Table 4 and FIG. 3, the histamine level of the material decreased in correlation with an increasing final concentration of sodium hydroxide (NaOH), i.e., from 0 wt%, 0.25 wt% to 0.5 wt%.
* * *
[0065] In addition to the various embodiments depicted and claimed, the disclosed subject matter is also directed to other embodiments having other combinations of the features disclosed and claimed herein. As such, the particular features presented herein can be combined with each other in other manners within the scope of the disclosed subject matter such that the disclosed subject matter includes any suitable combination of the features disclosed herein. The foregoing description of specific embodiments of the disclosed subject matter has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosed subject matter to those embodiments disclosed.
[0066] It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the systems and methods of the disclosed subject matter without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosed subject matter. Thus, it is intended that the disclosed subject matter include modifications and variations that are within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method of treating one or more protein sources, the method comprising adding one or more base components to the protein source, wherein the treated protein sources have a histamine level of less than about 300 ppm.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the base component comprises sodium hydroxide (NaOH).
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the sodium hydroxide (NaOH) is present at a concentration of from about 0.25 wt% to about 0.5 wt%.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more protein sources comprises animal protein, animal-derived protein, or combinations thereof.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more protein sources comprises viscera.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the treated protein sources have a histamine level of from about 10 ppm to about 200 ppm.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the treated protein sources have a pH of from about 5 to about 8.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the treated protein sources have a pH of from about 6 to about 7.
PCT/US2020/053454 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods of treating animal proteins Ceased WO2021067384A1 (en)

Priority Applications (11)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/765,871 US20220346406A1 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods of treating animal proteins
CN202080071586.4A CN114554861A (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Method for treating animal proteins
MX2022003777A MX2022003777A (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 METHODS OF TREATMENT OF ANIMAL PROTEINS.
BR112022005618A BR112022005618A2 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 ANIMAL PROTEIN TREATMENT METHODS
EP20872806.3A EP4037488A4 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 ANIMAL PROTEIN PROCESSING METHODS
CA3151388A CA3151388A1 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods of treating animal proteins
AU2020357938A AU2020357938A1 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods of treating animal proteins
KR1020227014873A KR20220075409A (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods for processing animal protein
JP2022515847A JP2022550009A (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Animal protein processing method
ZA2022/03145A ZA202203145B (en) 2019-10-02 2022-03-16 Methods of treating animal proteins
JP2025161837A JP2026004403A (en) 2019-10-02 2025-09-29 How animal protein is processed

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19306262.7A EP3799721A1 (en) 2019-10-02 2019-10-02 Methods of treating animal proteins
EP19306262.7 2019-10-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021067384A1 true WO2021067384A1 (en) 2021-04-08

Family

ID=68296411

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2020/053454 Ceased WO2021067384A1 (en) 2019-10-02 2020-09-30 Methods of treating animal proteins

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US20220346406A1 (en)
EP (2) EP3799721A1 (en)
JP (2) JP2022550009A (en)
KR (1) KR20220075409A (en)
CN (1) CN114554861A (en)
AU (1) AU2020357938A1 (en)
BR (1) BR112022005618A2 (en)
CA (1) CA3151388A1 (en)
MX (1) MX2022003777A (en)
WO (1) WO2021067384A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA202203145B (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120213889A1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2012-08-23 Wen Chiang Methods for enhancing animal digest palatability
US20130156887A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2013-06-20 Norcape Biotechnology As Hydrolysed marine protein product, process for the production thereof, and application
US20140134319A1 (en) * 2011-09-22 2014-05-15 Samsung Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd Processed meat product without added phosphate, and method of producing same
US20140242215A1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2014-08-28 Specialites Pet Food Animal digests having enhanced palatability for use in pet food

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1920222A (en) * 1928-05-09 1933-08-01 Atlantic Coast Fisheries Co Process of treating comestibles
US3215540A (en) * 1962-11-02 1965-11-02 Rath Packing Company Process of curing meat and composition therefor
US3968255A (en) * 1974-04-08 1976-07-06 General Foods Corporation Method of preparing animal food of increased palatability
DK509681A (en) * 1981-11-17 1983-05-18 Matcon Radgivende Ing Firma PROCEDURE FOR INCREASING SUSTAINABILITY AND WATER BONDING CAPACITY AND IMPROVING THE CONSISTENCY OF MEAT FROM MEATS
JPS6232848A (en) * 1985-08-05 1987-02-12 Ajinomoto Co Inc Fish meal
US5102987A (en) * 1988-10-14 1992-04-07 Nestec S.A. Preparation of hydrolyzed protein having reduced α-chlorohydrin content
JP2957826B2 (en) * 1992-12-01 1999-10-06 三慶株式会社 Pretreatment agent for processing marine products and pretreatment method for marine products
NZ302388A (en) * 1995-03-06 1999-02-25 Katayama Kk Processed fish meat or pieces with added salts and alkaline agents and method of processing
NO309673B1 (en) * 1999-07-05 2001-03-12 Norsk Hydro As Gelled feed product, means for making the product and process for making said product
JP3085746U (en) * 2001-10-31 2002-05-17 ロード・ニジュウイチ株式会社 Silk protein supplement for animal feed
WO2005002354A1 (en) * 2003-06-24 2005-01-13 Cargill, Incorporated Recovery of peptones
WO2005009137A1 (en) * 2003-07-21 2005-02-03 Danisco Usa Inc. Improved yield and shelf life for meats
US7862843B2 (en) * 2004-01-14 2011-01-04 Urthtech, Llc Method of sanitizing a biological tissue
BE1016629A3 (en) * 2005-06-06 2007-03-06 Sfinc Nv METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING animal offal.
FR2960129B1 (en) * 2010-05-20 2014-10-10 Roquette Freres PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF ALKALINE HYDROLYSATES OF PLANT PROTEINS
FR2975259B1 (en) * 2011-05-16 2014-01-31 Roquette Freres INDUSTRIAL PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF ALKALINE HYDROLYSATES OF PLANT PROTEINS
JP5995273B2 (en) * 2012-07-19 2016-09-21 池田食研株式会社 Manufacturing method of lever processed products
WO2014092717A1 (en) * 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. Anti-aging foods for companion animals
FR3004725B1 (en) * 2013-04-19 2016-01-08 Ifremer USE OF LACTOBACILLUS SAKEI FOR BIOPRESERVATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF THE SEA
EP2832237A1 (en) * 2013-07-30 2015-02-04 Tessenderlo Chemie NV Method for producing hydrolysed keratinaceous material
CN104543970A (en) * 2015-01-13 2015-04-29 浙江工业大学 Deep processing method of low-value marine fish leftover protein hydrolysate
CA3015935C (en) * 2016-03-02 2019-09-03 Specialites Pet Food Palatable cat kibbles containing specific fat fractions

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20130156887A1 (en) * 2004-05-26 2013-06-20 Norcape Biotechnology As Hydrolysed marine protein product, process for the production thereof, and application
US20120213889A1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2012-08-23 Wen Chiang Methods for enhancing animal digest palatability
US20140134319A1 (en) * 2011-09-22 2014-05-15 Samsung Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd Processed meat product without added phosphate, and method of producing same
US20140242215A1 (en) * 2011-10-03 2014-08-28 Specialites Pet Food Animal digests having enhanced palatability for use in pet food

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3799721A1 (en) 2021-04-07
CN114554861A (en) 2022-05-27
EP4037488A1 (en) 2022-08-10
BR112022005618A2 (en) 2022-07-12
AU2020357938A1 (en) 2022-03-31
EP4037488A4 (en) 2023-03-08
CA3151388A1 (en) 2021-04-08
MX2022003777A (en) 2022-04-25
JP2022550009A (en) 2022-11-30
US20220346406A1 (en) 2022-11-03
ZA202203145B (en) 2023-11-29
KR20220075409A (en) 2022-06-08
JP2026004403A (en) 2026-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Duran et al. Effects of slaughter methods on physical, biochemical and microbiological quality of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss and mirror carp Cyprinus carpio filleted in pre-, in-or post-rigor periods
US20180360075A1 (en) Cat food rolls
US11291229B2 (en) Meat analogs comprising thin flakes for food compositions
US20240122205A1 (en) Method for producing protein material
EP2931061B1 (en) Method of preparing a food composition
US20220346406A1 (en) Methods of treating animal proteins
Latifa et al. Comparative study of quality-analysis of three different Bangladeshi smoke-dried lean fishes using salt and turmeric stored at refrigeration temperature (4 C)
Tzikas et al. Production of low-salt restructured Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) using microbial transglutaminase/caseinate system
Palmeira et al. Quality of semi-prepared products from rainbow trout waste (Onchorynchus mykiss) by using different technological strategics
Vavrišínová et al. LAUGHTER CHARACTERISTICS AND PHYSICAL TECHNOLOGICAL PARAMETERS OF VEAL FROM MALE CALVES OF HOLSTEIN AND SLOVAK SIMMENTAL BREEDS
Fıçıcılar et al. Influence of Garlic and Hot Pepper Sauce on the Quality of Marinated Anchovies during 7 Months at 4° C Storage
KR20260041395A (en) Functional feed composition using animal protein sources and its manufacturing method
Fakolade et al. A comparison study on the quality attributes of kilishi produced from camel, chevon and pork
Cavenaghi-Altemio et al. Development and characterisation of cooked inlaid sausages with fillet and mechanically separated meat of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)
RU2475039C2 (en) Frozen natural fodder for cats and dogs
Haščík et al. Principal component analysis of sensory properties of chicken breast muscle supplemented with different feed additives.
RU2781997C2 (en) Meat analogues for feed compositions, containing thin plates
Hedji et al. Effect of packaging on the microbiological quality of chicken and fish viscera flour
RU2727653C1 (en) Method for production of meat chips and composition for preparation thereof
RU2726334C2 (en) Method for preparation of small lump semi-products from reindeer by-product
Pramila Umaraw et al. Quality characteristics of edible byproducts compared to Longissimus dorsi muscle of Barbari kids.
Vranešević et al. Microbiological parameters and sensory characteristics of sliced meat products packaged in modified atmosphere throughout the shelf life
AMBROSIADIS Copyright© 2018 Z TZIKAS, N SOULTOS, I AMBROSIADIS, A LAZARIDOU, SP GEORGAKIS
RU2520018C1 (en) Method for production of raw products of poultry meat
Zuber et al. Rate and Extent of Troponin-T Degradation in Loins from Pigs Selected for Low and High Residual Feed Intake

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20872806

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022515847

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 3151388

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2020357938

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20200930

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112022005618

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20227014873

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2020872806

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20220502

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112022005618

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20220324