CA2307570C - Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels - Google Patents
Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2307570C CA2307570C CA002307570A CA2307570A CA2307570C CA 2307570 C CA2307570 C CA 2307570C CA 002307570 A CA002307570 A CA 002307570A CA 2307570 A CA2307570 A CA 2307570A CA 2307570 C CA2307570 C CA 2307570C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- equivalence
- chromium
- nickel
- steel
- corrosion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 46
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 64
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Molybdenum Chemical compound [Mo] ZOKXTWBITQBERF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000011733 molybdenum Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 7
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 238000005275 alloying Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910001566 austenite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000001247 metal acetylides Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910000851 Alloy steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 239000008186 active pharmaceutical agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910045601 alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000956 alloy Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000001649 bromium compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 150000001805 chlorine compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- VNNRSPGTAMTISX-UHFFFAOYSA-N chromium nickel Chemical compound [Cr].[Ni] VNNRSPGTAMTISX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- YOCUPQPZWBBYIX-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper nickel Chemical compound [Ni].[Cu] YOCUPQPZWBBYIX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 229910000734 martensite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005482 strain hardening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000010963 304 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bromide Chemical compound [Br-] CPELXLSAUQHCOX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910018487 Ni—Cr Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000589 SAE 304 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000012670 alkaline solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005294 ferromagnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005242 forging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- -1 halide salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-] XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009533 lab test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001953 recrystallisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/58—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)
- Shielding Devices Or Components To Electric Or Magnetic Fields (AREA)
- Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
- Hard Magnetic Materials (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Earth Drilling (AREA)
- Cutting Tools, Boring Holders, And Turrets (AREA)
- Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)
Abstract
A non-magnetic corrosion and galling resistant high strength steel suitable for use as non-magnetic components in directional drilling of oil and gas wells whose composition by weight includes: carbon up to 0.2 %;
silicon up to 1.0 %; manganese from 10.0 to 20.0 %;
chromium from 13.5 to 18.0 %; nickel from 1.0 to 7.0 %; molybdenum from 1.5 to 4.0 %; and nitrogen from 0.2 to 0.4 %, the composition satisfying the formulae: (i) and (ii): nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence > 35
silicon up to 1.0 %; manganese from 10.0 to 20.0 %;
chromium from 13.5 to 18.0 %; nickel from 1.0 to 7.0 %; molybdenum from 1.5 to 4.0 %; and nitrogen from 0.2 to 0.4 %, the composition satisfying the formulae: (i) and (ii): nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence > 35
Description
Non-Magnetic Corrosion Resistant High Strength Steels This invention reiates to non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels. More especially, but not exclusively, the invention relates to steels suitable for use as non-magnetic components in directional drilling of oil and gas wells.
When deep well drilling, long tubular drill collars are located at the lower ends of drill strings to provide weight and rigidity. Lengths of these collars are typically between 1 and 10 metres and their diameters are typically between 8.75 and 32.5cm. Each such collar includes a central, axial hole of diameter typically between 5.75 to 12.75 cm which a{lows drilling fluid to pass down the string to the well base. This fluid subsequently, returns to the surface outside the drill collar and string.
Threaded ends allow the collars to be secured to one another and to other components of the string. Dimensional and mechanical property requirements are laid down in API 7 Section 6.
It is often desirable to include instruments near the bottom of the drill string to enable the angle and direction of drilling to be measured accurately.
The proximity of a large ferromagnetic mass is such instruments is clearly undesirable. When instruments are to be employed, low alloy steels conventionally used for the manufacture of drill collars have been replaced with steels having low magnetic permeability. Precipitation hardened nickel-copper alloys and special austenitic stainless steels have been used previously as replacement steels. The strength requirements for drill collars (typically 0.2% proof strength in excess of 100 ksi (690 mPa)) cannot be achieved with a nickel copper alloy or with standard chromium nickel steels of the '300' series even when annealed, and while such steels can be strengthened by cold straining, the degree of deformation required is prohibitive, especially in the large sections involved. Moreover, some standard nickel chromium steels have austenitic structures of limited stability and can have their magnetic permeability increased by deformation.
Consequently, a series of special steel grades was developed for this specialised application, these having analyses typified by steels A and B
below:
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo N
A .05 .5 18 13 2.3 .5 .3 B .03 .5 10 18 7 - .35 C .03 .4 19 16.5 .7 - .5 In these steels, yield strength is increased by the presence of relatively high nitrogen contents. This presence also increases strain -hardening rate, as does the reduction in nickel content. The relatively high manganese levels are necessary to retain the high nitrogen contents during normal melting, casting and solidification at atmospheric pressure, and also to improve the stability of the austenitic structure. A low carbon content is necessary to limit the formation of chromium rich carbides during processing; the presence of such carbides can adversely reduce resistance to corrosion. Even with these special steels, some strain hardening is necessary to generate the required strength. This can, however, be readily achieved, even in the largest sections, by deformation at temperatures below that which produces auto-recrystallisation.
Steels A and B therefore provided the required yield strength, but at the expense of other desired properties.
Of the desired properties, low magnetic permeability is paramount and the alloying balance must be such that the structure is both free from delta ferrite and will not be destabilised by deformation. A number of methods have been proposed by which the structure of a steel may be predicted from its composition. These all involved separating the elements into those which act similarly to chromium and those similarly to nickel.
Each was allocated an equivalence factor and by means of these the total chromium equivalence and nickel equivalence are calculated. The interceptor of these two values on a diagram is reported to show structure including some indication of the proportions of phases in a multi-phase case. The diagrams are used with some success within certain composition ranges but have proved less successful elsewhere. One obvious inaccuracy is that the same equivalence values are used whether austenite-ferrite boundaries or austenite martensite boundaries are being predicted, which cannot be the case.
A hazard with all steels used in drill strings is galling at the threaded joints. Such joints must be made at high torques to minimise stress concentration in service and provide effective seals at mating shoulders. In this context, galling may be described as localised friction-welding of surfaces moving relative to one another under pressure. Galling can prevent successful jointing of components and/or prevent release of the joint between components after use. The damage caused on thread and shoulder surfaces (production of cavities and metal build up) can render them unsuitable for further use and, although some re-threading can be achieved, the lives of the components are shortened. Austenitic stainless steels are especially prone to galling and, although compositions A and B are superior in this respect to more conventional 300 series stainless steels, improved galling resistance was required which led to the development of composition C. This composition is now widely used.
A further service hazard is that of corrosion. Drilling fluids used are commonly aqueous and compositions are chosen to be compatible with the strata being drilled. Drilling fluids often have large contents of solids, both soluble and insoluble, notably chlorides and, less frequently, bromides which can cause corrosion problems. To minimise this, pH is usually kept above neutral so that hydrogen evaluation cannot be a corrosion product, and the cathodic corrosion reaction will normally involve water and dissolved oxygen producing the hydroxyl ion. Thus the availability of dissolved oxygen will control the rate of corrosion possible; because the source of oxygen is the atmosphere, dissolved oxygen of the fluid will be controlled by drilling conditions and procedures. It is usually low enough for there to be few problems with low alloy steel components. With these, any corrosion is general in nature and therefore, with limited oxygen availability the resulting general charges in dimension are small and tolerable.
Corrosion of stainless steels in more alkaline solutions does not occur because of the presence of a stable oxide film on the surface (the passive film). In the presence of certain dissolved salts, and notably chlorides and bromides, this film can fail locally allowing the production of "pits". Although total corrosion rate is slower than for a low alloy steel in the same environment, the local penetration can be more rapid. such film breakdown is more likely within crevices where it can spread to be general within the confines of the crevice. Oxygen is necessary for such corrosion to initiate and propagate and probability is more likely with higher contents of chloride and/or bromide and oxygen. Probability is also greater at height temperatures as can apply downhole. Thus some corrosion is possible with the non-magnetic steels depending upon service conditions but, with collars, this has rarely been of consequence, the pits being of limited size and occurring in large sections.
Localised corrosion can be of more consequence in the non-magnetic steel casings used to contain the sophisticated electronic measuring devices used when drilling. The internal geometry within these devices can be complex and involve functional crevices and also changes in section, which can retain deposits, producing crevices. In these elaborate devices, localised corrosion is less tolerable than for the relatively simple collars. Furthermore, there can be a mixture of metals in electronic contact which can exacerbate conditions by galvanic effects. Thus there is need for a steel of enhanced resistance to localised corrosion which exhibits the other desired properties mentioned previously, these being high strength, low magnetic permeability, structural stability and anti galling properties.
None of the previously discussed steels provide all these desired properties.
The invention sets out to provide such a steel which does have all of these desired properties.
According to the present invention in one aspect, there is provided a non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steel whose composition by weight % includes:-Carbon, up to 0.05%
Silicon, up to 1.0%
Manganese, from 10.0 to 20.0%
Chromium, from 13.5 to 18.0%
Nickel, from 1.0 to 4.0%
Molybdenum, from 1.5 to 3.5%
Nitrogen, from 0.2 to 0.4%
In another aspect, the invention provides a non-magnetic corrosion and galling resistant high strength steels whose composition by weight includes Carbon up to 0.2%
Silicon up to 1.0%
Manganese from 10.0 to 20.0%
Chromium from 13.5 to 18.0%
Nickel from 1.0 to 7.0%
Molybdenum from 1.5 to 4.0%; and Nitrogen from 0.2 to 0.4%, the composition satisfying the formulae:-(i) Nickel equivalence > 1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 and (ii) Nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence >35 A preferred composition by weight % of steels in accordance with the invention is carbon up to 0.55%, silicon up to 1%, manganese 12 to 16%, chromium 14 to 16%, nickel 1.0 to 5%, molybdenum 1.7 to 3.0%
and nitrogen, 0.2 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities.
A further more limited composition by weight % is carbon up to 0.035%, silicon up to 0.5%, manganese 13 to 15.0%, chromium 15 to 16%, nickel 2.0 to 2.75%, molybdenum 2.0 to 2.5% and nitrogen 0.30 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities.
Preferably, the balance of the composition conforms with the following equation:-Ni eguivalence > 1.51 Cr equivalence - 14 when Cr equivalence = %Cr + 1.5% Si + %Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = %Ni + 30%C + 20% N
Additionally, the balance of the composition may conform with the following equations :
Cr equivalence = Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = %Ni + 30% C + 20% N
and Ni equivalence + Cr equivalence > 35.
where Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + %Mo; and Ni equivalence = % Ni + 0.5% Mn + 30% C + 30% N.
In another aspect, the invention provides a non-magnetic component for use in directional drilling produced from a nigh strength corrosion resistant steel of composition as specified in any one of the preceding four paragraphs. The component may be a drill collar.
It is well known than an essential component of a stainless steel is chromium, at least 12% by weight in solid solution being generally deemed to be desirable. For the type of corrosion in question (caused by dissolved halide salts), increasing the content of chromium above this value progressively improves resistance to corrosion initiation and its rate of propagation. A number of other elements can complement the beneficial effect of chromium, notably molybdenum. Both chromium and molybdenum however, promote the formation of magnetic delta ferrite phase which cannot be tolerated for the particular use under consideration. To prevent the presence of this ferrite phase, there must be present in sufficient amounts elements which suppress its formation, notably carbon, nickel and nitrogen. The tolerable content of carbon is very low because the presence of carbides can be deleterious to corrosion resistance. Nickel has a deleterious effect on the tendency for galling and thus its content must also be low. Nitrogen, however, has no deleterious effect on galling and, moreover, in the presence of chromium, improves resistance to corrosion.
However, the quantity of nitrogen which can be retained in a steel on freezing is limited unless there is sufficient appropriate alloying of the current type. While chromium promotes solubility in proportion to its content, chromium alloying alone is insufficient and it has to be supplemented with manganese. Manganese, however, adversely effects resistance to corrosion.
A very careful balance of alloying is therefore necessary if the required downhole property balance of the steel is to be achieved.
As mentioned previously, of the desired properties, low magnetic permeability is paramount and the alloying balance must be such that the structure is both free from delta ferrite and will not be destabilised by deformation. A number of methods have been proposed by which the structure of a steel may be predicted from its composition. These all involved separating the elements into those which act similarly to chromium and those similarly chromium and those similarly to nickel. Each was allocated an equivalence factor and by means of these the total chromium equivalence and nickel equivalence are calculated. The interceptor of these two values on a diagram is reported to show structure including some indication of the proportions of phases in a multi-phase case. The diagrams are used with some success within certain composition ranges but have proved less successful elsewhere. One obvious inaccuracy is that the same equivalence values are used whether austenite-ferrite boundaries or austenite martensite boundaries are being predicted, which cannot be the case. For the present invention the factors used for the two aspects are not necessarily the same as published and the approach has been simplified by using a simple equation to predict whether or not ferrite is present and the sum of factors to indicate a suitable austenite stability. It is not beiieved that the various factors used will necessarily apply to other alloy mixes other than the range relevant to this invention.
Applicants has established that an excellent downhole property balance is achieved with high strength corrosion resistant steels having the following composition by weight:-Carbon Up to 0.05%
Silicon Up to 1.0%
Manganese 10 to 20%
Chromium 13.5 to 18%
Nickel 1.0 to 7.0%
Molybdenum 1.0 to 4.0%
Nitrogen 0.2 to 0.4%
In addition, it is preferred that the balance of composition conforms with the following:-With Nickel eguivalence > 1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 Where chromium equivalence = % chromium + 1.5 x % silicon +
% molybdenum + 0.12 x % manganese and nickel equivalence = % nickel + 30 x % carbon + 20 x % nitrogen and also with nickel equivalence +
chromium equivalence >35.
Where chromium equivalence = % chromium + 1.5 x % silicon +
% molybdenum and nickel equivalence = % nickel + 0.5 x % carbon + 30 % nitrogen.
All the above values are percentages by weight with the balance essentially iron. It is to be understood that the elements normally incidentally present in austenitic stainless steels may be present within the limits set for such steels in BS970 Part 1. Preferred and more preferred compositions are as follows.
Preferred More Preferred Carbon .05% maximum .035% maximum Silicon 1.0% maximum .50%
Manganese 12.0 to 16.0% 13.0 to 15.0%
Chromium 14.0 to 16.0% 15.0 to 16.0%
Nickel 1.0 to 5.0% 2.0 to 2.75%
Molybdenum 1.7 to 3.0% 2.0 to 2.5%
Nitrogen .20 to .40% .30 to .40%
It is to be understood that the elements normally present as incidentals in stainless steels may also be present in the quantities normally accepted in international standards.
One example of a steel composition in accordance with the invention is:
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo N
0.031 0.50 14.86 15.06 2.46 2.02 0.30 This steel was forged to form 10 metre length bars of 180 mm and 190 mm diameter by a normal production technique including hot forging and warm straining. The mechanical properties taken from positions in accordance with API 7 Section 6 were:
0.2% Proof Stress 118.9 ksi ( MPa) U.T.S. 139.9 KSI ( MPa) Elongation 37%
Reduction of Area 68%
Charpy 'V' (20 ) 156, 164, 167 Joules Magnetic permeability was 1.002 and uniformity of this property was confirmed by measuring the changing magnetic flux along the bar when subjected to a magnetic force of 200 oersteds. Maximum deviation was found to be less than 0.05 micro tesla over the whole bar length.
Resistance to galling was demonstrated by use of the button-on-block technique described in ASTM G98. This involves rotating separate cylindrical samples under pressure on blocks of similar material. Increasing pressures being used until galling is seen. Results are compared with those for steels A to B and C in Table 1 below.
Pressure, ksi Steel A Steel B Steel C Steel of the present Invention 3.5 Not galled 6.5 Not galled 9.5 Not galled Not Galled Galled 12 Not Galled Galled 14 Not Galled Galled Not galled 17.5 Not galled Galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled 32.5 Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled 36.25 Galled Not galled 37.5 Galled Not galled Not galled 42.5 Not galled It will be seen from this Table that steel B galled at around 10 ksi, steel A at around 20 ksi and steel C at around 36.25. The steel sample in accordance with the invention had not galled at the highest recorded pressure, namely 42.5 ksi.
Corrosion resistance was demonstrated by two accelerated laboratory tests. The corrodent chosen was a 20% solution of sodium chloride at 50 C open to atmosphere. The test sample was a small cylinder and this was embedded in a layer of fine sand to simulate severe crevice conditions.
The sample was connected via an ammeter to an electrode either of copper or of type 304 stainless steel; the electrode surface area was 150 sq cms.
The current flow provided an indication of the corrosion occurring. To accelerate the test there was an initial period when the test sample was polarised anodically at a high current to ensure that corrosion had started and was proceeding at a high rate. After stopping polarisation, the current flow was monitored until a steady value was obtained and this was noted.
_.....--' ' . , . . .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .=. . ... ...
. . . . . . . . .
. . .. . . .... .. .. . . .. EPO - Munich 13 2 ? Sep. 1999 Values for static and flowing solutions were taken. These are tabulated in Table 2 below:-Copper Electrode 304 Electrode Static Flowing Static Flowing mA mA mA mA
Steel A 4.9 6.4 2.1 2.7 Steel C 4.4 6.8 2.2 3.4 Steel of the present invention 0.33 0.15 0.50 0.79 The test with the stainless steel electrode simulated severe crevice conditions and that with the copper electrode the added effect of galvanic stimulation. It will be seen from Table 2 that the steel sample of the present invention exhibited substantially enhanced corrosion resistance.
- The tests conducted demonstrated that steels in accordance with the present invention exhibit a property balance for strength, magnetic permeability, galling resistance and corrosion resistance superior in every respect to presently available high strength corrosion resistant steels.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing is merely exemplary of non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels and non-magnetic components produced therefrom in accordance with the invention and that various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the true scope of the invention.
When deep well drilling, long tubular drill collars are located at the lower ends of drill strings to provide weight and rigidity. Lengths of these collars are typically between 1 and 10 metres and their diameters are typically between 8.75 and 32.5cm. Each such collar includes a central, axial hole of diameter typically between 5.75 to 12.75 cm which a{lows drilling fluid to pass down the string to the well base. This fluid subsequently, returns to the surface outside the drill collar and string.
Threaded ends allow the collars to be secured to one another and to other components of the string. Dimensional and mechanical property requirements are laid down in API 7 Section 6.
It is often desirable to include instruments near the bottom of the drill string to enable the angle and direction of drilling to be measured accurately.
The proximity of a large ferromagnetic mass is such instruments is clearly undesirable. When instruments are to be employed, low alloy steels conventionally used for the manufacture of drill collars have been replaced with steels having low magnetic permeability. Precipitation hardened nickel-copper alloys and special austenitic stainless steels have been used previously as replacement steels. The strength requirements for drill collars (typically 0.2% proof strength in excess of 100 ksi (690 mPa)) cannot be achieved with a nickel copper alloy or with standard chromium nickel steels of the '300' series even when annealed, and while such steels can be strengthened by cold straining, the degree of deformation required is prohibitive, especially in the large sections involved. Moreover, some standard nickel chromium steels have austenitic structures of limited stability and can have their magnetic permeability increased by deformation.
Consequently, a series of special steel grades was developed for this specialised application, these having analyses typified by steels A and B
below:
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo N
A .05 .5 18 13 2.3 .5 .3 B .03 .5 10 18 7 - .35 C .03 .4 19 16.5 .7 - .5 In these steels, yield strength is increased by the presence of relatively high nitrogen contents. This presence also increases strain -hardening rate, as does the reduction in nickel content. The relatively high manganese levels are necessary to retain the high nitrogen contents during normal melting, casting and solidification at atmospheric pressure, and also to improve the stability of the austenitic structure. A low carbon content is necessary to limit the formation of chromium rich carbides during processing; the presence of such carbides can adversely reduce resistance to corrosion. Even with these special steels, some strain hardening is necessary to generate the required strength. This can, however, be readily achieved, even in the largest sections, by deformation at temperatures below that which produces auto-recrystallisation.
Steels A and B therefore provided the required yield strength, but at the expense of other desired properties.
Of the desired properties, low magnetic permeability is paramount and the alloying balance must be such that the structure is both free from delta ferrite and will not be destabilised by deformation. A number of methods have been proposed by which the structure of a steel may be predicted from its composition. These all involved separating the elements into those which act similarly to chromium and those similarly to nickel.
Each was allocated an equivalence factor and by means of these the total chromium equivalence and nickel equivalence are calculated. The interceptor of these two values on a diagram is reported to show structure including some indication of the proportions of phases in a multi-phase case. The diagrams are used with some success within certain composition ranges but have proved less successful elsewhere. One obvious inaccuracy is that the same equivalence values are used whether austenite-ferrite boundaries or austenite martensite boundaries are being predicted, which cannot be the case.
A hazard with all steels used in drill strings is galling at the threaded joints. Such joints must be made at high torques to minimise stress concentration in service and provide effective seals at mating shoulders. In this context, galling may be described as localised friction-welding of surfaces moving relative to one another under pressure. Galling can prevent successful jointing of components and/or prevent release of the joint between components after use. The damage caused on thread and shoulder surfaces (production of cavities and metal build up) can render them unsuitable for further use and, although some re-threading can be achieved, the lives of the components are shortened. Austenitic stainless steels are especially prone to galling and, although compositions A and B are superior in this respect to more conventional 300 series stainless steels, improved galling resistance was required which led to the development of composition C. This composition is now widely used.
A further service hazard is that of corrosion. Drilling fluids used are commonly aqueous and compositions are chosen to be compatible with the strata being drilled. Drilling fluids often have large contents of solids, both soluble and insoluble, notably chlorides and, less frequently, bromides which can cause corrosion problems. To minimise this, pH is usually kept above neutral so that hydrogen evaluation cannot be a corrosion product, and the cathodic corrosion reaction will normally involve water and dissolved oxygen producing the hydroxyl ion. Thus the availability of dissolved oxygen will control the rate of corrosion possible; because the source of oxygen is the atmosphere, dissolved oxygen of the fluid will be controlled by drilling conditions and procedures. It is usually low enough for there to be few problems with low alloy steel components. With these, any corrosion is general in nature and therefore, with limited oxygen availability the resulting general charges in dimension are small and tolerable.
Corrosion of stainless steels in more alkaline solutions does not occur because of the presence of a stable oxide film on the surface (the passive film). In the presence of certain dissolved salts, and notably chlorides and bromides, this film can fail locally allowing the production of "pits". Although total corrosion rate is slower than for a low alloy steel in the same environment, the local penetration can be more rapid. such film breakdown is more likely within crevices where it can spread to be general within the confines of the crevice. Oxygen is necessary for such corrosion to initiate and propagate and probability is more likely with higher contents of chloride and/or bromide and oxygen. Probability is also greater at height temperatures as can apply downhole. Thus some corrosion is possible with the non-magnetic steels depending upon service conditions but, with collars, this has rarely been of consequence, the pits being of limited size and occurring in large sections.
Localised corrosion can be of more consequence in the non-magnetic steel casings used to contain the sophisticated electronic measuring devices used when drilling. The internal geometry within these devices can be complex and involve functional crevices and also changes in section, which can retain deposits, producing crevices. In these elaborate devices, localised corrosion is less tolerable than for the relatively simple collars. Furthermore, there can be a mixture of metals in electronic contact which can exacerbate conditions by galvanic effects. Thus there is need for a steel of enhanced resistance to localised corrosion which exhibits the other desired properties mentioned previously, these being high strength, low magnetic permeability, structural stability and anti galling properties.
None of the previously discussed steels provide all these desired properties.
The invention sets out to provide such a steel which does have all of these desired properties.
According to the present invention in one aspect, there is provided a non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steel whose composition by weight % includes:-Carbon, up to 0.05%
Silicon, up to 1.0%
Manganese, from 10.0 to 20.0%
Chromium, from 13.5 to 18.0%
Nickel, from 1.0 to 4.0%
Molybdenum, from 1.5 to 3.5%
Nitrogen, from 0.2 to 0.4%
In another aspect, the invention provides a non-magnetic corrosion and galling resistant high strength steels whose composition by weight includes Carbon up to 0.2%
Silicon up to 1.0%
Manganese from 10.0 to 20.0%
Chromium from 13.5 to 18.0%
Nickel from 1.0 to 7.0%
Molybdenum from 1.5 to 4.0%; and Nitrogen from 0.2 to 0.4%, the composition satisfying the formulae:-(i) Nickel equivalence > 1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 and (ii) Nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence >35 A preferred composition by weight % of steels in accordance with the invention is carbon up to 0.55%, silicon up to 1%, manganese 12 to 16%, chromium 14 to 16%, nickel 1.0 to 5%, molybdenum 1.7 to 3.0%
and nitrogen, 0.2 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities.
A further more limited composition by weight % is carbon up to 0.035%, silicon up to 0.5%, manganese 13 to 15.0%, chromium 15 to 16%, nickel 2.0 to 2.75%, molybdenum 2.0 to 2.5% and nitrogen 0.30 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities.
Preferably, the balance of the composition conforms with the following equation:-Ni eguivalence > 1.51 Cr equivalence - 14 when Cr equivalence = %Cr + 1.5% Si + %Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = %Ni + 30%C + 20% N
Additionally, the balance of the composition may conform with the following equations :
Cr equivalence = Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = %Ni + 30% C + 20% N
and Ni equivalence + Cr equivalence > 35.
where Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + %Mo; and Ni equivalence = % Ni + 0.5% Mn + 30% C + 30% N.
In another aspect, the invention provides a non-magnetic component for use in directional drilling produced from a nigh strength corrosion resistant steel of composition as specified in any one of the preceding four paragraphs. The component may be a drill collar.
It is well known than an essential component of a stainless steel is chromium, at least 12% by weight in solid solution being generally deemed to be desirable. For the type of corrosion in question (caused by dissolved halide salts), increasing the content of chromium above this value progressively improves resistance to corrosion initiation and its rate of propagation. A number of other elements can complement the beneficial effect of chromium, notably molybdenum. Both chromium and molybdenum however, promote the formation of magnetic delta ferrite phase which cannot be tolerated for the particular use under consideration. To prevent the presence of this ferrite phase, there must be present in sufficient amounts elements which suppress its formation, notably carbon, nickel and nitrogen. The tolerable content of carbon is very low because the presence of carbides can be deleterious to corrosion resistance. Nickel has a deleterious effect on the tendency for galling and thus its content must also be low. Nitrogen, however, has no deleterious effect on galling and, moreover, in the presence of chromium, improves resistance to corrosion.
However, the quantity of nitrogen which can be retained in a steel on freezing is limited unless there is sufficient appropriate alloying of the current type. While chromium promotes solubility in proportion to its content, chromium alloying alone is insufficient and it has to be supplemented with manganese. Manganese, however, adversely effects resistance to corrosion.
A very careful balance of alloying is therefore necessary if the required downhole property balance of the steel is to be achieved.
As mentioned previously, of the desired properties, low magnetic permeability is paramount and the alloying balance must be such that the structure is both free from delta ferrite and will not be destabilised by deformation. A number of methods have been proposed by which the structure of a steel may be predicted from its composition. These all involved separating the elements into those which act similarly to chromium and those similarly chromium and those similarly to nickel. Each was allocated an equivalence factor and by means of these the total chromium equivalence and nickel equivalence are calculated. The interceptor of these two values on a diagram is reported to show structure including some indication of the proportions of phases in a multi-phase case. The diagrams are used with some success within certain composition ranges but have proved less successful elsewhere. One obvious inaccuracy is that the same equivalence values are used whether austenite-ferrite boundaries or austenite martensite boundaries are being predicted, which cannot be the case. For the present invention the factors used for the two aspects are not necessarily the same as published and the approach has been simplified by using a simple equation to predict whether or not ferrite is present and the sum of factors to indicate a suitable austenite stability. It is not beiieved that the various factors used will necessarily apply to other alloy mixes other than the range relevant to this invention.
Applicants has established that an excellent downhole property balance is achieved with high strength corrosion resistant steels having the following composition by weight:-Carbon Up to 0.05%
Silicon Up to 1.0%
Manganese 10 to 20%
Chromium 13.5 to 18%
Nickel 1.0 to 7.0%
Molybdenum 1.0 to 4.0%
Nitrogen 0.2 to 0.4%
In addition, it is preferred that the balance of composition conforms with the following:-With Nickel eguivalence > 1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 Where chromium equivalence = % chromium + 1.5 x % silicon +
% molybdenum + 0.12 x % manganese and nickel equivalence = % nickel + 30 x % carbon + 20 x % nitrogen and also with nickel equivalence +
chromium equivalence >35.
Where chromium equivalence = % chromium + 1.5 x % silicon +
% molybdenum and nickel equivalence = % nickel + 0.5 x % carbon + 30 % nitrogen.
All the above values are percentages by weight with the balance essentially iron. It is to be understood that the elements normally incidentally present in austenitic stainless steels may be present within the limits set for such steels in BS970 Part 1. Preferred and more preferred compositions are as follows.
Preferred More Preferred Carbon .05% maximum .035% maximum Silicon 1.0% maximum .50%
Manganese 12.0 to 16.0% 13.0 to 15.0%
Chromium 14.0 to 16.0% 15.0 to 16.0%
Nickel 1.0 to 5.0% 2.0 to 2.75%
Molybdenum 1.7 to 3.0% 2.0 to 2.5%
Nitrogen .20 to .40% .30 to .40%
It is to be understood that the elements normally present as incidentals in stainless steels may also be present in the quantities normally accepted in international standards.
One example of a steel composition in accordance with the invention is:
C Si Mn Cr Ni Mo N
0.031 0.50 14.86 15.06 2.46 2.02 0.30 This steel was forged to form 10 metre length bars of 180 mm and 190 mm diameter by a normal production technique including hot forging and warm straining. The mechanical properties taken from positions in accordance with API 7 Section 6 were:
0.2% Proof Stress 118.9 ksi ( MPa) U.T.S. 139.9 KSI ( MPa) Elongation 37%
Reduction of Area 68%
Charpy 'V' (20 ) 156, 164, 167 Joules Magnetic permeability was 1.002 and uniformity of this property was confirmed by measuring the changing magnetic flux along the bar when subjected to a magnetic force of 200 oersteds. Maximum deviation was found to be less than 0.05 micro tesla over the whole bar length.
Resistance to galling was demonstrated by use of the button-on-block technique described in ASTM G98. This involves rotating separate cylindrical samples under pressure on blocks of similar material. Increasing pressures being used until galling is seen. Results are compared with those for steels A to B and C in Table 1 below.
Pressure, ksi Steel A Steel B Steel C Steel of the present Invention 3.5 Not galled 6.5 Not galled 9.5 Not galled Not Galled Galled 12 Not Galled Galled 14 Not Galled Galled Not galled 17.5 Not galled Galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled 32.5 Not galled Not galled Not galled Not galled 36.25 Galled Not galled 37.5 Galled Not galled Not galled 42.5 Not galled It will be seen from this Table that steel B galled at around 10 ksi, steel A at around 20 ksi and steel C at around 36.25. The steel sample in accordance with the invention had not galled at the highest recorded pressure, namely 42.5 ksi.
Corrosion resistance was demonstrated by two accelerated laboratory tests. The corrodent chosen was a 20% solution of sodium chloride at 50 C open to atmosphere. The test sample was a small cylinder and this was embedded in a layer of fine sand to simulate severe crevice conditions.
The sample was connected via an ammeter to an electrode either of copper or of type 304 stainless steel; the electrode surface area was 150 sq cms.
The current flow provided an indication of the corrosion occurring. To accelerate the test there was an initial period when the test sample was polarised anodically at a high current to ensure that corrosion had started and was proceeding at a high rate. After stopping polarisation, the current flow was monitored until a steady value was obtained and this was noted.
_.....--' ' . , . . .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .=. . ... ...
. . . . . . . . .
. . .. . . .... .. .. . . .. EPO - Munich 13 2 ? Sep. 1999 Values for static and flowing solutions were taken. These are tabulated in Table 2 below:-Copper Electrode 304 Electrode Static Flowing Static Flowing mA mA mA mA
Steel A 4.9 6.4 2.1 2.7 Steel C 4.4 6.8 2.2 3.4 Steel of the present invention 0.33 0.15 0.50 0.79 The test with the stainless steel electrode simulated severe crevice conditions and that with the copper electrode the added effect of galvanic stimulation. It will be seen from Table 2 that the steel sample of the present invention exhibited substantially enhanced corrosion resistance.
- The tests conducted demonstrated that steels in accordance with the present invention exhibit a property balance for strength, magnetic permeability, galling resistance and corrosion resistance superior in every respect to presently available high strength corrosion resistant steels.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing is merely exemplary of non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels and non-magnetic components produced therefrom in accordance with the invention and that various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the true scope of the invention.
Claims (4)
1. A non-magnetic corrosion and galling resistant high strength steel whose composition by weight includes Carbon up to 0.035%
Silicon up to 0.5%
Manganese from 13.0 to 15.0%
Chromium from 15.0 to 16.0%
Nickel from 2.0 to 2,75%
Molybdenum from 2.0 to 2.5%; and Nitrogen from 0.30 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities, the composition satisfying the formulae:
(i) Nickel equivalence >1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 and (ii) Nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence >35 wherein Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = % Ni + 30% C + 20% N.
Silicon up to 0.5%
Manganese from 13.0 to 15.0%
Chromium from 15.0 to 16.0%
Nickel from 2.0 to 2,75%
Molybdenum from 2.0 to 2.5%; and Nitrogen from 0.30 to 0.40%, balance iron and incidental impurities, the composition satisfying the formulae:
(i) Nickel equivalence >1.51 Chromium equivalence minus 14 and (ii) Nickel equivalence + chromium equivalence >35 wherein Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo + 0.12% Mn and Ni equivalence = % Ni + 30% C + 20% N.
2. A steel as claimed in claim 1 wherein the composition further satisfies the formulae:
Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo;
and Ni equivalence =% Ni + 0.5% Mn + 30% C + 30% N.
Cr equivalence = % Cr + 1.5% Si + % Mo;
and Ni equivalence =% Ni + 0.5% Mn + 30% C + 30% N.
3. A non-magnetic component for use in directional drilling produced from a high strength corrosion resistant steel of composition as claimed in claim 1 or 2.
4. A drill collar produced from a high strength corrosion resistant steel as claimed in claim 1.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB9723242A GB2331103A (en) | 1997-11-05 | 1997-11-05 | Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels |
| GB9723242.5 | 1997-11-05 | ||
| PCT/GB1998/003029 WO1999023267A1 (en) | 1997-11-05 | 1998-10-08 | Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2307570A1 CA2307570A1 (en) | 1999-05-14 |
| CA2307570C true CA2307570C (en) | 2008-08-26 |
Family
ID=10821528
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002307570A Expired - Lifetime CA2307570C (en) | 1997-11-05 | 1998-10-08 | Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels |
Country Status (11)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1051529B1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE210741T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU9359698A (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9813966A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2307570C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69802967T2 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK1051529T3 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2169925T3 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2331103A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO334118B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1999023267A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (28)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7603758B2 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2009-10-20 | Shell Oil Company | Method of coupling a tubular member |
| AU6981001A (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2002-01-02 | Shell Oil Co | Radial expansion of tubular members |
| US7357188B1 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2008-04-15 | Shell Oil Company | Mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| US7185710B2 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2007-03-06 | Enventure Global Technology | Mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| US7363984B2 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2008-04-29 | Enventure Global Technology, Llc | System for radially expanding a tubular member |
| GB2344606B (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2003-08-13 | Shell Int Research | Forming a wellbore casing by expansion of a tubular member |
| AU770359B2 (en) | 1999-02-26 | 2004-02-19 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Liner hanger |
| US7350563B2 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2008-04-01 | Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C. | System for lining a wellbore casing |
| US7516790B2 (en) | 1999-12-03 | 2009-04-14 | Enventure Global Technology, Llc | Mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| US7100685B2 (en) | 2000-10-02 | 2006-09-05 | Enventure Global Technology | Mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| GB2421258B (en) | 2001-11-12 | 2006-08-09 | Enventure Global Technology | Mono diameter wellbore casing |
| JP2003155542A (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-05-30 | Japan Atom Energy Res Inst | High Mn non-magnetic steel for superconducting magnet structural materials with excellent hot workability and resistance to heat embrittlement after heat treatment for forming superconductors |
| US7377326B2 (en) | 2002-08-23 | 2008-05-27 | Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C. | Magnetic impulse applied sleeve method of forming a wellbore casing |
| GB2406125B (en) | 2002-05-29 | 2006-11-01 | Enventure Global Technology | Radially expanding a tubular member |
| AU2003274310A1 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2003-12-22 | Enventure Global Technology | Mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| AU2003263852A1 (en) | 2002-09-20 | 2004-04-08 | Enventure Global Technology | Self-lubricating expansion mandrel for expandable tubular |
| US7739917B2 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2010-06-22 | Enventure Global Technology, Llc | Pipe formability evaluation for expandable tubulars |
| US7886831B2 (en) | 2003-01-22 | 2011-02-15 | Enventure Global Technology, L.L.C. | Apparatus for radially expanding and plastically deforming a tubular member |
| JP2006517011A (en) | 2003-01-27 | 2006-07-13 | エンベンチャー グローバル テクノロジー | Lubrication system for radial expansion of tubular members |
| GB2429996B (en) | 2003-02-26 | 2007-08-29 | Enventure Global Technology | Apparatus for radially expanding and plastically deforming a tubular member |
| US20050166387A1 (en) | 2003-06-13 | 2005-08-04 | Cook Robert L. | Method and apparatus for forming a mono-diameter wellbore casing |
| US7712522B2 (en) | 2003-09-05 | 2010-05-11 | Enventure Global Technology, Llc | Expansion cone and system |
| US10316616B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2019-06-11 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Dissolvable bridge plug |
| US7819185B2 (en) | 2004-08-13 | 2010-10-26 | Enventure Global Technology, Llc | Expandable tubular |
| US8770261B2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2014-07-08 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods of manufacturing degradable alloys and products made from degradable alloys |
| US7658883B2 (en) | 2006-12-18 | 2010-02-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Interstitially strengthened high carbon and high nitrogen austenitic alloys, oilfield apparatus comprising same, and methods of making and using same |
| US9347121B2 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2016-05-24 | Ati Properties, Inc. | High strength, corrosion resistant austenitic alloys |
| US11111552B2 (en) | 2013-11-12 | 2021-09-07 | Ati Properties Llc | Methods for processing metal alloys |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3151979A (en) * | 1962-03-21 | 1964-10-06 | United States Steel Corp | High strength steel and method of treatment thereof |
| GB1432396A (en) * | 1973-07-09 | 1976-04-14 | Armco Steel Corp | Chromium-nickel-manganese-nitrogen austenitic stainless steel |
| US4450008A (en) * | 1982-12-14 | 1984-05-22 | Earle M. Jorgensen Co. | Stainless steel |
| AT381658B (en) * | 1985-06-25 | 1986-11-10 | Ver Edelstahlwerke Ag | METHOD FOR PRODUCING AMAGNETIC DRILL STRING PARTS |
| US5094812A (en) * | 1990-04-12 | 1992-03-10 | Carpenter Technology Corporation | Austenitic, non-magnetic, stainless steel alloy |
| JPH06235049A (en) * | 1993-02-09 | 1994-08-23 | Nippon Steel Corp | High strength nonmagnetic stainless steel and its production |
| JPH06322446A (en) * | 1993-05-13 | 1994-11-22 | Kobe Steel Ltd | Production of high strength nonmagnetic stainless steel pc stranded wire excellent in stress corrosion cracking resistance |
| EP0694626A1 (en) * | 1994-07-26 | 1996-01-31 | Acerinox S.A. | Austenitic stainless steel with low nickel content |
-
1997
- 1997-11-05 GB GB9723242A patent/GB2331103A/en not_active Withdrawn
-
1998
- 1998-10-08 DE DE69802967T patent/DE69802967T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-10-08 AU AU93596/98A patent/AU9359698A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-10-08 WO PCT/GB1998/003029 patent/WO1999023267A1/en not_active Ceased
- 1998-10-08 EP EP98946594A patent/EP1051529B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-10-08 DK DK98946594T patent/DK1051529T3/en active
- 1998-10-08 AT AT98946594T patent/ATE210741T1/en active
- 1998-10-08 ES ES98946594T patent/ES2169925T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-10-08 CA CA002307570A patent/CA2307570C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-10-08 BR BR9813966-5A patent/BR9813966A/en active IP Right Grant
-
2000
- 2000-04-27 NO NO20002170A patent/NO334118B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO1999023267A1 (en) | 1999-05-14 |
| ES2169925T3 (en) | 2002-07-16 |
| CA2307570A1 (en) | 1999-05-14 |
| NO334118B1 (en) | 2013-12-16 |
| GB2331103A (en) | 1999-05-12 |
| EP1051529B1 (en) | 2001-12-12 |
| EP1051529A1 (en) | 2000-11-15 |
| DE69802967T2 (en) | 2002-09-12 |
| DK1051529T3 (en) | 2002-04-08 |
| ATE210741T1 (en) | 2001-12-15 |
| DE69802967D1 (en) | 2002-01-24 |
| NO20002170L (en) | 2000-05-04 |
| NO20002170D0 (en) | 2000-04-27 |
| BR9813966A (en) | 2000-09-26 |
| AU9359698A (en) | 1999-05-24 |
| GB9723242D0 (en) | 1998-01-07 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2307570C (en) | Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels | |
| US20050047952A1 (en) | Non-magnetic corrosion resistant high strength steels | |
| US12285824B2 (en) | Methods of welding high manganese steel with step-out weld zone erosion-corrosion resistance | |
| EP2035593B1 (en) | Austenitic paramagnetic corrosion resistant material | |
| JP4502011B2 (en) | Seamless steel pipe for line pipe and its manufacturing method | |
| US4400349A (en) | Alloy for making high strength deep well casing and tubing having improved resistance to stress-corrosion cracking | |
| JP5740315B2 (en) | Low alloy steel with high yield stress and high sulfide stress cracking resistance | |
| US5238508A (en) | Ferritic-austenitic duplex stainless steel | |
| US4400210A (en) | Alloy for making high strength deep well casing and tubing having improved resistance to stress-corrosion cracking | |
| US4400209A (en) | Alloy for making high strength deep well casing and tubing having improved resistance to stress-corrosion cracking | |
| EP1214457B1 (en) | Use of a stainless steel for umbilicals in seawaters | |
| JP2003525354A (en) | Duplex stainless steel | |
| AU2017226126A1 (en) | Steel material and oil-well steel pipe | |
| JPS61130464A (en) | Non-magnetic steel for drill collar having superior corrosion resistance and high strength | |
| CA2313975C (en) | Paramagnetic, corrosion-resistant austenitic steel and process for producing it | |
| US5858128A (en) | High chromium martensitic steel pipe having excellent pitting resistance and method of manufacturing | |
| Inohara et al. | Recent development in high strength linepipe for sour environment | |
| JP3890821B2 (en) | High strength and high toughness stainless steel with excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance | |
| Venkataraman et al. | Development of Centrifugally Cast 22% Cr Duplex Steel for Line Pipe | |
| Maiti et al. | The characterization of fracture toughness of two X-70 pipeline steels | |
| Royer et al. | Spun steel pipes for the offshore industry | |
| Uhl et al. | Evaluation of HIP Nickel-Base Alloys for Extreme Sour Service | |
| Venkataraman et al. | Centrifugally cast 25% Cr superduplex steel for solid CRA line pipe | |
| Lula | New Austenitic and Ferritic Stainless Steels for Sea Water Applications | |
| Walsh et al. | Development of Pyromet 31 Alloy (UNS N07031) to Meet Deep Sour Gas and Oil Well Materials Challenges |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20181009 |