Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
  • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
  • B24D11/00—Constructional features of flexible abrasive materials; Special features in the manufacture of such materials
  • B24D11/04—Zonally-graded surfaces
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
  • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
  • B24D3/00—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents

Definitions

• This invention relates to coated abrasive products and is especially concerned with coated abrasive products using two or more different abrasive minerals.
• any nominal grade is made up of three particle size fractions, viz., a "control” fraction, an "overgrade” fraction containing large particles nominally one fraction coarser than the control fraction, and a "fine” fraction containing small particles finer than the control fraction. Additionally ANSI standards permit the inclusion of up to 0.5% particles coarser than the overgrade fraction. The percentage of particles falling within each fraction varies from grade to grade; in general, however, about 50-60% are in the control fraction, about 10% in the overgrade fraction and about 30-40% in the fine fraction. When considered as a total, the sum of the three fractions is referred to as "full grade.”
• grade refers to a specified combination of abrasive particles as related to the standard mesh screens through which the particles will or will not pass.
• ANSI Publication B74.18-1977 provides that a coated abrasive product having a nominal Grade 50 mineral coat will contain a control fraction which will pass through a 48.5-mesh (1 Std.) screen but not through a 58.5-mesh (3 Std.) screen, an overgrade fraction that will pass through a 37-mesh (38 GG) screen but not a 48.5-mesh (1 Std.) screen, and a fine fraction that will pass through a 58.5-mesh (3 Std.) screen.
• Grade 50 may include up to 0.5% of extra-coarse particles that pass through a 32-mesh (32GG) but not through a 38-mesh (38GG) screen.
• the term "mesh” refers to the number of openings per lineal inch in the screen.
• Grading systems employed in foreign countries also utilize screens but vary somewhat as to the exact particle size, the number of screens and the percentage of particles falling in the several fractions that collectively make up a "full grade”.
• the Japanese grading system employs three fractions; the European grading system effectively includes four fractions, the coarsest three of which correspond roughly to the ANSI overgrade and control fractions.
• the various grading systems are all intended to provide complete utilization of all the particles obtained during the process of crushing the originally supplied lumps of raw abrasive mineral.
• abrasive mineral For any given abrading operation, some types of abrasive mineral are more effective than others. For most metal abrading operations, however, the most widely used mineral has long been fused aluminum oxide, or alumina. In recent years, superior minerals have been developed by the co-fusion of alumina and zirconia; see, e.g., U.S. Pats. No. 3,181,939, 3,891,408, and 3,893,826. Another recently developed superior mineral, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,314,827, is a non-fused synthetic alumina-based mineral containing certain metal oxide and/or spinel additives.
• Both the co-fused alumina:zirconia and the non-fused ceramic products are significantly more expensive than the conventional fused alumina, as, of course, are the coated abrasive products made with such minerals.
• Other slightly superior -- and comparatively expensive -- alumina-based minerals may be obtained by specially heat treating or coating conventional fused alumina.
• the present invention provides coated abrasive products having excellent abrading effectiveness, utilizing the advantages inherent in superior abrasive grains while minimizing the quantity of such grains actually employed. Indeed, in some instances synergistic effects are obtained, the construction actually performing better than coated abrasive products in which only the superior mineral is present.
• the present invention combines a minor portion of superior abrasive grains and the balance, correspondingly constituting a major portion, of inferior abrasive grains in such a way that most of the superior grain is concentrated in the coarsest portion.
• the unexpectedly good performance contributed by the superior grain can sometimes be detected in quantities as low as 1% by weight, but 3% of the superior grain contributes more consistently significant improvement.
• the superior abrasive grain will constitute 5% to 30% (preferably 10% to 20%) of the total mineral weight. It is technically feasible to add up to 50% of the superior grain, but the additional cost generally will not justify doing so.
• the invention can be broadly characterized as a coated abrasive product having a specified nominal grade of abrasive granules firmly adherently bonded to a sheet backing, the particle size of the granules ranging from large, or coarse to small, or fine.
• the granules consist essentially of two types of mineral, one type being present as a minor portion and demonstrably superior to an equivalent grade of the other type in the abrading operation for which the coated abrasive product is intended to be used, most of the superior mineral being concentrated in the coarser portion of the particles.
• products corresponding to the invention can be made utilizing either a single application of blended abrasive grains or a multiple coating operation in which the first mineral coat does not conform to conventional mineral grading specifications because it exceeds the limits for fine particles, and the second mineral coat does not conform to conventional mineral grading specifications because it exceeds the limits for coarse particles.
• the coarse fraction which consists essentially of the superior mineral, is present in the second coat.
• the overall composition of the two mineral layers is, however, in full compliance with mineral grading specifications.
• a pre-weighed cold rolled steel workpiece (SAE 1018) 1 inch x 2 inches x 7-1/4 inches (approximately 2.5 x 5 x 18 cm), mounted in a holder, is positioned vertically, with the 1-inch x 7-1/4 inch (2.5- x 18-cm) face confronting a 14-inch (approximately 36-cm) diameter 65 Shore A durometer serrated rubber contact wheel over which is entrained a Grade 50 belt to be tested.
• the workpiece is then reciprocated vertically through a 7-1/4-inch (18-cm) path at the rate of 20 cycles per minute, while a spring-loaded plunger urges the workpiece against the belt with a force of 25 lbs (11.3 kg) as the belt is driven at 5500 surface feet (about 1675 meters) per minute.
• the workpiece is pulled away from the moving belt, the first workpiece-holder assembly removed and reweighed, the amount of stock removed calculated by subtracting the abraded weight from the original weight, and a new pre-weighed workpiece and holder mounted on the equipment. Using four workpieces, this procedure is repeated for a total of 88 minutes or until the cut per minute is 25 grams or less, whichever occurs sooner. With coarser or finer grades of mineral, abrading force may be respectively increased or decreased and final cut figures likewise adjusted.
• the total cut values are considered accurate to +5%; thus, if a belt from one lot cuts over 10% more than a belt from another lot, the first belt is deemed “superior” and the second "inferior". As might be expected, a higher degree of reliability is achieved if duplicate belts are tested.
• the total cut values tabulated below were obtained for a series of belts made to ANSI standards using solely the type of coated abrasive mineral indicated. In each case, the cut figure is the average of at least two belts.
• Each of the following examples was prepared using a conventional cloth backing, viz., rayon drills saturated with a blend of synthetic rubber latex and phenolic resin.
• a conventional calcium carbonate-filled phenol-formaldehyde make coat was applied, the mineral electrostatically coated in conventional manner, the make coat precured, a conventional calcium carbonate-filled size coat applied, and both make and size coats then final cured.
• the abrasive grain was a blend of (1) the fine and control fractions of conventional Grade 50 fused alumina mineral, and (2) as a replacement for the coarse (overgrade) fraction, an equivalent weight of a full grade of Grade 40 superior mineral.
• the overgrade fraction present in the full grade of the Grade 40 mineral would be excessively coarse for use in Grade 50, such is not the case in actual practice.
• pre-coating screening removes any particles -- perhaps 1% -- that are larger than ANSI standards permit for Grade 50 products.
• Endless belts 3 inches (7.6 cm) wide x 132 inches (335 cm) long were prepared from both conventional coated abrasive material and coated abrasive material made in accordance with the experimental examples. These belts were then entrained over a 20-inch (51-cm) diameter 65 Shore D durometer rubber contact wheel, serrated at a 45° angle to the lateral surfaces of the wheel, lands being 3/4 inch (approximately 19 mm) wide and grooves one-third that dimension.
• the belts were then driven at 7380 surface feet (2250 meters) per minute while sets of pre-weighed metal test bars having either a rectangular or a circular cross section (approximate area 0.5-1 in 2 , or about 3.2-6.4 cm 2 ) were urged against the belt under a pressure of either 100 or 150 psi (690 or 1035 kPa).
• Sets of 15 pre-weighed bars of SAE 1095 steel, 1018 steel, and 304 stainless steel were employed, while sets of 10 pre-weighed bars of Waspalloy and Inconel 600 were employed. Each bar was run for 5 seconds.
• a coated abrasive product was made by the same procedure as in Example 1, ANSI Grade 80 mineral being substituted for the ANSI Grade 50 and all coating weights adjusted appropriately. In other words, in this Example 4, the coarse fraction was made up of the full grade of Grade 60.
• Belts were prepared in the same manner as for Examples 1-3 and tested on a comparable piece of equipment, the differences being that the belt speed was 5500 surface feet (about 1675 meters) per minute and the pressure applied to the workpiece was either 30 or 75 psi (respectively about 207 or 517 kPa). For convenience in comparing results, cut figures have been converted to percentages, conventional fused alumina at 30 psi (207 kPa) being assigned the value of 100%.
• Coated abrasive belts were made as in Examples 1 and 4, (i.e., each containing 10% CUB) in Grades 36, 50, 60, and 80. These belts were then tested according to the method described earlier in connection with evaluating "superior” and “inferior” minerals; the tests were, however, run for a predetermined period of time, rather than to a predetermined cutting rate. This time was 40 minutes for the Grade 50 belts and 30 minutes for Grades 36, 60, and 80.
• the control belts for each grade were conventional products made with fused alumina. Results are tabulated below: The Grade 50 and Grade 80 belts were then field tested against the same controls, where results in grinding various cold rolled or tool steel workpieces were as follows:
• coated abrasive products in which the abrasive grain was applied in a single coating.
• coated abrasive products have sometimes been made by applying the abrasive grain in two separate stages, typically drop coating the bottom portion and subsequently electrostatically coating the top portion. This two-step procedure offers certain advantages in the practice of the present invention, where it is possible to divide the abrasive grains so that the first layer contains substantially no coarse particles, the second layer containing a disproportionately large percentage of coarse particles.
• the coarse particles are predominantly made up of a comparatively expensive "superior" mineral
• the effect of the two-coat system is to provide a higher concentration of these particles in the abrading surface that initially contacts the material to be abraded.
• the following examples illustrate this type of contruction.
• Example 9 contains 5% CUB based on the total weight of mineral present.
• Examples 10-13 contain 10% "superior” mineral based on the total weight of mineral present.
• Cured 7-inch (17.8-cm) diameter discs were first conventionally flexed to controllably crack the hard bonding resins, mounted on a beveled aluminum back-up pad, and used to grind the face of a 1-inch (2.5-cm) x 7-1/4-inch (18.4-cm) 1.25-cm x 30-cm 1018 cold rolled steel workpiece.
• Each disc was driven at 5000 rpm while the portion of the disc overlying the beveled edge of the back-up pad contacted the workpiece with a force of 10 lbs (4.5 kg) or 15 lbs (6.8 kg), generating a disc wear path of 18.9 in 2 (about 120 cm 2 ).
• Each disc was used to grind 10 separate workpieces for 1 minute each, the cumulative cut figures being shown in Table VII below:
• Grade 24 discs were prepared using different combinations of abrasive grains and tested under a 15-lb (33-kg) load in substantially the same manner as in Examples 18-20, but using an 8-inch (20-cm) long work piece. Results are tabulated below:
• the performance of the coated abrasive products made in accordance with the invention is not only consistently superior to that of coated abrasive products made with full grade blends but also superior to the performance that would be predicted by interpolating between the individual cut figures for the minerals blended.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
• Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)

Priority Applications (1)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Publications (3)

Family

ID=27085777

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (6)

Cited By (3)

Families Citing this family (2)

Family Cites Families (5)

• 1985
  • 1985-05-01 DE DE8585303103T patent/DE3586549T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1985-05-01 AT AT85303103T patent/ATE79793T1/de active
  • 1985-05-01 EP EP85303103A patent/EP0161869B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1985-05-02 AU AU41908/85A patent/AU571967B2/en not_active Expired
  • 1985-05-08 BR BR8502189A patent/BR8502189A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1985-05-09 KR KR1019850003141A patent/KR950000004B1/ko not_active Expired - Lifetime

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events