EP1005568A1 - Methode zur bestimmung toxischer substanzen - Google Patents

Methode zur bestimmung toxischer substanzen

Info

Publication number
EP1005568A1
EP1005568A1 EP98945188A EP98945188A EP1005568A1 EP 1005568 A1 EP1005568 A1 EP 1005568A1 EP 98945188 A EP98945188 A EP 98945188A EP 98945188 A EP98945188 A EP 98945188A EP 1005568 A1 EP1005568 A1 EP 1005568A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
dictyostelium
cells
environment
biosensor
reporter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP98945188A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Giorgio Mangiarotti
Valentina Mangiarotti
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP1005568A1 publication Critical patent/EP1005568A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms
    • C12Q1/025—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms for testing or evaluating the effect of chemical or biological compounds, e.g. drugs, cosmetics
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2520/00—Use of whole organisms as detectors of pollution

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process to detect toxic substances in the environment with the use of a biosensor.
  • the invention concerns also a biosensor for carrying out the process.
  • the biomonitoring of environmental toxicity is gradually supplanting the chemical monitoring; the advantage of the first one on the latter is that the determination of toxicity with living organisms is much more significant for the influences on the ecosystem and on human health. Furthermore the chemical monitoring allows the determination of the concentration of single substances which are already known to be present in a given environment, but, contrary to the biomonitoring, it does not allow the evaluation of the global toxicity of a given environment, when its nature is unknown.
  • the living organisms presently utilized for the biomonitoring of water are some species of fishes and macrocrustacea; those employed for the biomonitoring of air are some species of plants and lichens.
  • the limitations of the employment of these organisms are many.
  • First of all the species of fishes, macrocrustacea, plants and lichens more sensitive to toxic substances are not present in the most polluted environments, as in the vicinity of industry or sewer wastes, or in the cities, where the monitoring necessity is particularly relevant.
  • Transfering fishes or Crustacea to a laboratory and mantaining them in water withdrawn elsewhere require complex equipment and specialized personel. Transfering of plants and lichens is pratically impossible since their unrooting generally determines an acute sofference, if not their death.
  • kits which allow the rapid determination of the toxicity of water samples or of particles collected by filtering air samples.
  • One of the most largely used kit is the one known with the commercial name of "Microtox" , which is sold by Beckman. The kit allows to exploit the natural luminescence of a bacterium. If the bacterium looses its luminescence in contact with the kit and a sample of water, the water is toxic.
  • One of the aims of the present invention is to provide a process to detect the thoxic substances in the environment by using a biosensor whose sensibility is significantly greater than the one of the biosensors now available, and which can be used to quantify the extent of toxicity of any type of environment and to detect the presence and determine the nature of specific classes of toxic substances, even if they are present in very low amount, in the air, in the water, in the ground in nature or in a city, and in food and in any material man generally may be in conctact with.
  • Another aim of the invention is to provide a biosensor for carrying out this process, which allows these results to be obtained at low cost, without complex equipment and specilized personel.
  • the process to detect toxic substances in the environment using a biosensor includes the stages consisting in :
  • biosensor consisting of cells of a wild-type strain or of a genetically enegeneered strain of Dictyostelium discoi- deum, in coditions apt to development;
  • the process, according to the invention, for the preparation of genetically engeneered strains of Dictyostelium discoideum includes the stages consisting in:
  • wild typed or genetically engeneered strains of Dictyostelium are used for the detection of toxic substances in the environment.
  • the survey will simply require the exposure for a few hours in the environment to be monitored of wild type cells of Dictyostelium, in which case the morphological changes of cell aggregates will be followed, or of Dictyostelium cells in which a plasmid containing the gene of a reporter protein has been inserted; in the latter case the reporter gene is fused to regulatory elements derived from different genes of Dictyostelium.
  • reporter gene is expressed in different strains only when the selected specific regulatory sequences of Dictyostelium are activated.
  • the reporter protein will therefore be synthesised only when the regulatory sequences are activated.
  • the presence of the reporter protein in the organism will be detected by nuke eye. Description of the preferred Embodiment.
  • the reporter protein is the enzyme beta- galactosidase of E.coli, which breaks a compound known as X-gal turning it from colourless to blue. Since the organism at the end of development is about 3 mm big and is pratically colourless in nature, but it becomes blue if contains beta-galactosidase, the presence or abscence of the reporter enzyme can be recognized by nuke eye. Different cells of Dictyostelium have been transformed by the inventors with plamsids constructed in such a way that they express or not beta- galactosidase according to whether different amounts of toxic or mutagenic substances are in contact with the cells.
  • Dictyostelium is a lower fungus (a mixomicete) consisting of ameboid cells which in nature feed on bacteria by phagocitosis .
  • the organism is unicellular when it finds bacteria to feed and duplicate.
  • bacteria When bacteria are missing, about 100.000 cells call each other by releasing cAMP, and they aggregate, forming a pseudoplasmodium. They initiate a process of differentiation and morphogenesis during which single cells differentiate in two cell types: 80.000 become spores and 20.000 form the stalk which support the sorocarp.
  • the organism may grow in the laboratory on bacteria or in an axenic medium, and milliard of of cells can be easily be obtained.
  • cells are removed from the rich medium, washed in buffer and plated on Millipore filters placed on pads embedded with buffer. The filter is in conctact with the air.
  • Germinated spores (amoebae) cam be plated directly on a filter.
  • the morphologically most relevant part of development the one in which the expression of most developmental genes occurs, lasts 8 hr, from the 12th to the 20th hr of starvation.
  • the first cell aggregates appear, under a low magnification microscope, 6 hr after starvation (loose aggregates) (see Fig. 1). At 9 hr these aggregates present a tip (tipped aggregates). At 12 hr the tip aggregate elongates and a thin vertical structure appears (first finger). At 15 hr the tip of the first finger begins to invaginate in the cell mass, and a structure appears called mexican hat.
  • the mass formed by the spores begins to climb along the stalk (early and late culminants).
  • the fruiting body is formed, consisting of a stalk 3 mm long, with a sorocarp of a 2 mm diameter at the top.
  • Dictyostelium is the only organism whose development can be followed entirely in a laboratory in one day. As far as gene expression is concerned, about 4000 new genes are expressed in the last 8-10 hr of development.
  • the advantages of the utilization of Dictyostelium as a biosensor are at least four.
  • the first one is that the organism develops even if placed on the sidewalk of a street, and is terefore exposed to the air of a city center, or on the floor of an industrial building, or on any piece of land, but also on the surface of a piece of cheese or a piece of cloth.
  • Development occurs perfectly if the filter is embedded with deionized and bidistilled, and therefore absolutely pure, water: this filter can be used as a control; but other filters can in parallel be embedded with various dilutions of water withdrawn from a lake or a river, from the waste of a depuration plant, from the tap of drinkable water, or with water derived from an industrial waste.
  • the organism may therefore be used as a biosensor for any type of environment. If this is natural, it is possible to distinguish whether the toxic substance comes from the ground, when the filter placed on the ground is embedded of pure water and covered with a plastic cover, or from the air, when the filter is placed in a plastic dish which is left uncovered; whether the toxic substance comes from the water when the filter is embedded with water withdrawn from a lake or a river and is enclosed inside a plastic capsule. This is not possible with plants and with many animals, which are contemporary in contact with the water, the ground and the air of a given environment.
  • the second advantage is that higher is the toxicity, and at a more precocious stage the development is arrested, so that the morphology of the organism appears different. Therefore anybody, even a person not specifically trained, using a stereoscopic microscope which may cost 3 milions fire, can determine the degree of toxicity of the monitored environment comparing the morphology of the organism with pictures appositely supplied. Even more convenient is to count the fruiting bodies formed after 20 hr of development on the control filter and on the filters exposed to toxic substances. The dilution of the toxic substance(s) which allows the formation of only 50% of fruiting bodies compared to the control filter can be assumed as the EC50 of the toxic substance(s) . The determination of the degree of toxicity is thus elementary and can be done at a low cost.
  • the third advantage is the extreme sensitivity of the system, at least 50 fold higher than the one of the biosensors now available.
  • the inventors have observed that the development of Dictyostelium is arrested by concentrations of heavy metals (cuprum, zinc, iron, lead, cadmium, mercury, etc) and of organic substances such as CCl ⁇ , chloroform, dichlorometane, trichloroethane, trichloracetic acid, 2,4-dich- loro phenoxy acetic acid, aniline, phenol, benzene, toluene, gasolium etc., 20-100 fold lower than those detectable with the other biosensors.
  • Toxins produced by many fungi have been tested in parallel in mouse and in Dictyostelium: the sensitivity of the latter system is at least 100 fold greater.
  • the high sensitivity of the system is probably due to the fact that the developmental process is highly complex and requires the coordinate expression of 4.000 new genes in 8 hr mainly in a single type of cells (pre-spore cells). More complex is a system, and more responsive is to a minimal perturbation.
  • the possibility of detecting even minimal degrees of toxicity should allow more rapid interventions by the authorities preposed to human health and to the protection of the ecological systems.
  • the fourth advantage is the specificity of the system.
  • the inventors have observed that different classes of toxic substances arrest the development in different stages and block the expression of different genes. Therefore, by determining which group of genes is inhibited (with techniques that can be used only in specialised laboratories) it is possible to single out the class of toxic substances present in the examined environment, without the use of chemical tests blindly run. This is not possible with any other biosensor available. To be able to determine which class of toxic substance is present even in a minimal amount in an environment by placing in it a tray with a few dozens filters containing differently engeneered strains of Dictyostelium, will allow immediate interventions to eliminates the toxic substance.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
EP98945188A 1997-08-20 1998-08-08 Methode zur bestimmung toxischer substanzen Withdrawn EP1005568A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT97TO000751A ITTO970751A1 (it) 1997-08-20 1997-08-20 Uso del dictyostelium discoideum geneticamente ingegnerizzato e non per la rilevazione e l'individuazione di specifiche sostanze tossiche
ITTO970751 1997-08-20
PCT/EP1998/005043 WO1999009202A1 (en) 1997-08-20 1998-08-08 Process to detect toxic substances in the environment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1005568A1 true EP1005568A1 (de) 2000-06-07

Family

ID=11415958

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98945188A Withdrawn EP1005568A1 (de) 1997-08-20 1998-08-08 Methode zur bestimmung toxischer substanzen

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1005568A1 (de)
AU (1) AU9259298A (de)
IT (1) ITTO970751A1 (de)
WO (1) WO1999009202A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1921157B1 (de) * 2001-08-24 2010-05-26 Daikin Industries, Ltd. Verfahren zum Nachweis toxischer Substanzen
US7704692B1 (en) 2001-08-24 2010-04-27 Daiken Industries, Ltd. Process for detecting toxic substances
NL1020415C2 (nl) * 2002-04-17 2003-10-31 Tno Procescontrole gebaseerd op microbiologische activiteit.
NL1022152C2 (nl) * 2002-12-12 2004-06-18 Tno Procescontrole gebaseerd op analyse van microbiele populaties.

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9909202A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ITTO970751A1 (it) 1999-02-22
AU9259298A (en) 1999-03-08
WO1999009202A1 (en) 1999-02-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
McFeters et al. A comparison of microbial bioassays for the detection of aquatic toxicants
Dutka et al. Comparison of several microbiological toxicity screening tests
Liu et al. Assessment of metal contamination in estuarine surface sediments from Dongying City, China: Use of a modified ecological risk index
Asif et al. A review of on environmental pollution bioindicators
Eikelboom Process control of activated sludge plants by microscopic investigation
Lopez-Roldan et al. Evaluation of an automated luminescent bacteria assay for in situ aquatic toxicity determination
Janssen et al. Rapid toxicity screening tests for aquatic biota 1. Methodology and experiments with Daphnia magna
Lau et al. Roles of bacterial community composition in biofilms as a mediator for larval settlement of three marine invertebrates
Nigro et al. Cellular biomarkers for monitoring estuarine environments: transplanted versus native mussels
Blaise et al. A micro-algal solid-phase test to assess the toxic potential of freshwater sediments
Twagilimana et al. A new low-cost microbiotest with the protozoanSpirostomum teres: culture conditions and assessment of sensitivity of the ciliate to 14 pure chemicals
Power et al. Effect of single and paired metal inputs in soil on a stress-inducible transgenic nematode
Duleba et al. Applicability of diatom metabarcoding in the ecological status assessment of Hungarian lotic and soda pan habitats
Vicari et al. Genotoxic evaluation of different doses of methylmercury (CH3Hg+) in Hoplias malabaricus
Trielli et al. Effects of xenobiotic compounds on the cell activities of Euplotes crassus, a single-cell eukaryotic test organism for the study of the pollution of marine sediments
Lima et al. Genomic damage in Mugil curema (Actinopterygii: Mugilidae) reveals the effects of intense urbanization on estuaries in northeastern Brazil
Hussain et al. Variation in genotoxic susceptibility and biomarker responses in Cirrhinus mrigala and Catla catla from different ecological niches of the Chenab River
Reteuna et al. Performances of three bacterial assays in toxicity assessment
Sauvant et al. Microplate technique for screening and assessing cytotoxicity of xenobiotics with Tetrahymena pyriformis
EP1005568A1 (de) Methode zur bestimmung toxischer substanzen
Quiroz et al. Water chemistry and the distribution of Mexican Podostemaceae: a preliminary evaluation
Rico-Martínez et al. The use of aquatic invertebrate toxicity tests and invertebrate enzyme biomarkers to assess toxicity in the states of Aguascalientes and Jalisco, Mexico
Jiang et al. Development of an electrochemical bioassay based on the alkaline phosphatase activity of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to assess the toxicity of heavy metals
Dutka et al. A modified SOS-Chromotest procedure to test for genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in sediments directly without extraction
US20050112573A1 (en) Method of detecting toxic substance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000320

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20010301