EP1785276A2 - Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer - Google Patents

Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer Download PDF

Info

Publication number: EP1785276A2
Authority: EP; European Patent Office
Prior art keywords: benefit; error; marking; labeling; data
Prior art date: 2005-11-12
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.): Granted

Application number

EP06022778A

Other languages

German (de)

English (en)

Other versions

EP1785276A3 (fr

EP1785276B1 (fr

Inventor

Andreas Dipl.-Ing. Ihme

Horst Dipl.-Ing. Klingler

Thomas Dipl.-Ing. Walther

Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)

Manroland Sheetfed GmbH

Original Assignee

Manroland AG

MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG

Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)

2005-11-12

Filing date

2006-11-02

Publication date

2007-05-16

Family has litigation

First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37561090&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1785276(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2006-11-02 Application filed by Manroland AG, MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG filed Critical Manroland AG

2007-05-16 Publication of EP1785276A2 publication Critical patent/EP1785276A2/fr

2011-03-30 Publication of EP1785276A3 publication Critical patent/EP1785276A3/fr

2013-01-16 Application granted granted Critical

2013-01-16 Publication of EP1785276B1 publication Critical patent/EP1785276B1/fr

Status Revoked legal-status Critical Current

2026-11-02 Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
- B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
- B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
- B41P—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO PRINTING, LINING MACHINES, TYPEWRITERS, AND TO STAMPS
- B41P2233/00—Arrangements for the operation of printing presses
- B41P2233/50—Marks on printed material

Definitions

the invention relates to an error analysis and marking system which analyzes erroneous use of a signature during the sheet pass through a printing press, preferably a sheet-fed rotary printing press, and marks it as defective during the passage through the printing press.
the evaluation of the print quality is carried out by drawing a test sheet, which is then placed on a tuning desk and recorded and evaluated visually and / or metrologically.
a quality assessment is only a sample, so that a slow change in quality may not be noticed until after a significant period of time, resulting in a corresponding amount of waste.
sample sheet random quality defects for example, caused by slugs or scratches, difficult to grasp. Accordingly, it can not be prevented that a corresponding amount of unnoticed waste landed in the display, which then has to be sorted out before further processing by appropriate steps.
Permanent quality monitoring is possible with printing machines if, in particular after the last printing unit, an image recording device in the form of a camera together with image processing is arranged.
image inspection systems are for example from EP 1 190 855 A1 and the EP 0 884 182 B1 known.
the image data obtained by the image recording device are compared pixel-by-pixel with predetermined target values, whereupon, in the event of deviations from nominal values, either warnings are output or the printing process is intervened in a corrective manner.
the DE 200 10 920 U1 and the EP 1 167 036 A1 disclose a printing machine in which a quality determination of a printed image during the sheet pass through a printing machine by the print image or the sheet is detected by a camera and the recorded image of the printed image is evaluated by an image processing orientation by the recorded image is compared with a reference image ,
the substrate is printed with a variety of sub-images or benefits and the evaluation evaluates only a subset of these images.
the evaluation device outputs a counting signal that indicates the evaluated subset.
the DE 44 32 371 A1 discloses a method for identifying a single faulty benefit on a print sheet that has been multi-printed by a camera capturing an image of the print material and processing the data in an image processing system, the image processing system including the pre-defined or acquired benefit recorded Reference benefit compares. It checks whether the color location of the individual benefit matches a reference location. The measuring location was defined in advance. For error identification of a single benefit, the benefit number and the location coordinates of the single benefit are determined.
the DE 203 03 574 U1 discloses an image processing system for a printing press, wherein a printed sheet, which has been printed with multiple benefits, detected by a camera and the acquired image data are detected in an image processing device, wherein the image processing means are arranged according to the fault location controllable printing devices, through which at predefined locations of the substrate markings occur when the individual benefit carries a mistake. Based on this printed error feature, In the simplest case, a simple spray point, the erroneous benefit in a further processing device, after the entire sheet was separated by a suitable device in single use, can be detected and removed by a sensor.
the DE 10 2004 014 549 B3 discloses a method of identifying a single benefit with a print image of defective quality by having an inspection system with a camera capture an image from the sheet and process that data in an image processing system, the image processing system capturing the data of the captured image with a position, shape or data set Size on the sheet compares, with the record coming from a die for separating the benefits on the sheet.
a disadvantage of the in the DE 10 2004 014 549 B3 The solution disclosed is that the assignment of the errors to a benefit on the sheet is done in the image processing system.
the sheet can be picked up during the sheet pass only line by line or in sections during the sheet pass and the partial images are fed to the image processing device.
These recorded data are compared with the stored reference image, which originates from a recorded sheet or a reference image from the preliminary stage.
the image data of deviation from the reference are checked by complex algorithms.
the computing capacity of the image processing computer used is at the limit of what is technically possible, so that, starting from a certain amount of errors, the image processing algorithm is aborted and it defines entire arcs as errors.
An increase in computing capacity would only be possible by significantly increasing the computing capacity, for example by using one or more multiprocessor computers.
assigning the error data to a benefit for example, by the fault location of a benefit contour in the image processing device, which comes from punching die data, is assigned, the image processing computer is additionally charged. If the computing power is not significantly expanded, this additional computation and allocation overhead would reduce the amount of detectable errors.
the object of the present invention is to expand a printing quality device for a printing press in such a way that the information obtained by the printing quality device can be utilized in a simple manner even after printing, without the image processing device being burdened by additional computing algorithms.
the image recording of the sheet is triggered line by line triggered by a rotary encoder during the print run by a printing press.
the coordinates of each individual pixel on the printed sheet are known, the X-coordinate over the sheet width by the position of the pixel in the recorded line, while the Y-coordinate is defined in the sheet transport direction by the count pulse of the rotary encoder.
the location of each pixel is known as the X-Y coordinate. Any error detected in the image processing system can be assigned an XY coordinate without much computational effort.
the driving device can drive a plurality of marking devices.
Conceivable as a marking device would be inkjet printers, laser marking devices or also mechanical marking devices, which act on the signature at predefined or case-selected locations.
the marking on the printed sheet can be based on the sheet forward and / or sheet back related.
the marking devices can be present several times, wherein an own marking device is ideally assigned to each use over the sheet width. Especially with entangled benefit arrangements, as shown in Fig. 1, this can mean a high driving effort when each benefit is to be marked at a predefined location.
the benefits should be distributed on the sheet so that a marking device can mark all the consecutive benefits of a column.
This use makes sense if the marking does not have to be applied at a defined point of use.
a typical marker location of a carton when an error occurs within the contour of the carton is the tab of the carton, since typically the tab code as shown in Figure 2 is printed, which is evaluated within the finishing line.
This sensor system for evaluating the adhesive flap code can also be used to evaluate a printed error code.
the contour of the folding box must be known to the control computer.
marking directions e.g. motor driven to the marking location.
the laser beam can be deflected by mirrors or scanners in the X and Y directions so that any erroneous benefits can be marked.
control computer the contour data of the benefits on the sheet is known, since based on the contour data of the marking can be selected and optionally the marking device can be positioned or controlled. Moreover, it makes sense technically and economically to carry out the error assignment for a benefit in a control computer downstream of the image processing system, since otherwise the image processing system burdened by the amount of data and the complex calculation algorithm would soon reach its limits.
a picture is taken in a printing machine with a line camera or another type of camera and this image is then transmitted to an image processing computer (1), which examines the recorded image for defect images. If an error is found, coordinates are assigned to this error, for example the X-coordinate over the sheet width is defined by the position of the pixel in the recorded line and the Y-coordinate in the sheet transport direction by the count pulse of the rotary encoder.
the obtained XY coordinates are transmitted to the control computer (2) whose task is the control of the labeling and / or marking device (7).
the control computer (2) of the labeling and / or marking device (7) while the contour data (3) are provided which describe the location of the individual benefits on the sheet.
This contour data (3) can be transmitted from the precursor, for example in JDF or CIP format or as CAD data or by reading in a printed sheet having punched contours, by the camera located in the printing press to the control computer (2).
This data can then be used for positioning the marking heads and for assigning a fault location, which was transmitted as an XY coordinate from the image processing computer (1) to the control computer (2), to the individual use on the printed sheet.
the user assignment takes place here in a computer system, which is arranged downstream of the image processing system. From the image processing computer only XY coordinates are passed to this downstream computer to the actual Image analysis in the image processing computer does not charge additionally.
the control computer (2) uses the XY coordinates of the error supplied by the image processing computer (1) in conjunction with the contour data (3) to determine whether the individual benefit has an error or not (decision 4).
an individual code is applied to the benefit, which originates from a database with labeling data (5).
the demand for individualized packaging arises from the requirement of traceability of products, which is repeatedly raised. Gray market imports or product counterfeits can be proven with such a coding, the tracking of the delivery and process chain eg of pharmaceutical packaging is thus possible.
the possibility to print the benefit in case of default with a static or randomly obtained information is not excluded.
an error code (6) is printed on the utility.
the error code can be the absence of the numbering or marking for the good case, a simple marking or a special coding for the case of an error.
the procedure according to the second embodiment of the invention has the further advantage that the labeling and / or marking device is also active in Gutfall.
the marking device can not be used for several hours.
the use of slow-drying inks or other marking agents is not an option, otherwise there would be a risk of smearing or depositing during sheet transport and when laying the signature on the delivery pile. Every good benefit is also marked or coded provided, the marking device is active most of the time or always during the printing operation, so that the risk of drying is avoided.
a third embodiment is that each benefit is provided with the labeling or marking device (7) in the printing machine with an individual code, wherein in the control computer (2) of this labeling code is provided with a feature good or erroneous benefits.
the label code applied to the benefit is then forwarded together with the error feature to a database, a data store or directly via a data line to an external system.
the individual benefits come to a further processing device, which is provided with a suitable sensor for reading the applied code.
the code is read and compared with the previously stored data records in the database or in the data memory and evaluated with regard to the error feature.
Codes within the meaning of the invention may be alphanumeric characters, one- and two-dimensional barcodes or other suitable markings which allow individual recognition of the individual benefit.
An extension of the first, second and third embodiment represents the possibility of the control computer (2) the number of good or the number of good and the number of erroneous benefits to the machine control center of the printing press or to an external database or system, for Example, an operating data acquisition system to deliver.
the logging of good vouchers in the sense of "Geticianbogen" is known and state of the art. With this solution, a logging of good benefits would take place, ie at the level that will later be sold to the end customer.

Landscapes

Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
Quality & Reliability (AREA)
Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

EP06022778A 2005-11-12 2006-11-02 Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer Revoked EP1785276B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number	Priority Date	Filing Date	Title
DE102005054122.4A DE102005054122B4 (de)	2005-11-12	2005-11-12	Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Qualitätskontrollsystems für eine Bogenrotationsdruckmaschine

Publications (3)

Publication Number	Publication Date
EP1785276A2 true EP1785276A2 (fr)	2007-05-16
EP1785276A3 EP1785276A3 (fr)	2011-03-30
EP1785276B1 EP1785276B1 (fr)	2013-01-16

Family

ID=37561090

Family Applications (1)

Application Number	Title	Priority Date	Filing Date
EP06022778A Revoked EP1785276B1 (fr)	2005-11-12	2006-11-02	Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer

Country Status (2)

Country	Link
EP (1)	EP1785276B1 (fr)
DE (1)	DE102005054122B4 (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
EP2189287A3 (fr) *	2008-11-20	2012-01-18	manroland AG	Presse rotative
CN103547453A (zh) *	2010-12-27	2014-01-29	优泰克加工股份公司	用于调节和监控具有中心压印滚筒的柔性版印刷机的印刷辊的压力的系统及方法
ITUB20159538A1 (it) *	2015-12-29	2017-06-29	Grafikontrol S P A	Sistema per rilevare e tracciare difetti durante le fasi di lavorazione di materiali.
US10525697B2 (en)	2016-07-19	2020-01-07	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Inspection system having a plurality of detection zones
CN112848676A (zh) *	2019-11-12	2021-05-28	海德堡印刷机械股份公司	经改善的页张行进监控
EP4008554A1 (fr) *	2020-12-03	2022-06-08	SWISS KRONO Tec AG	Procédé et dispositif de traitement d'un objet

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
ATE477110T1 (de)	2007-06-29	2010-08-15	Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag	Fertigungssystem zur herstellung von faltschachteln und verfahren zum zuführen von makulaturfreien nutzen an eine faltschachtelklebemaschine
DE102012106981A1 (de)	2012-07-31	2014-02-06	Eltromat Gmbh	Verfahren zur Prüfung des Druckergebnisses bei Rotationsdruckmaschinen
DE102012023391A1 (de)	2012-11-30	2014-06-05	Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag	Qualitätskontrollsystem für eine Druckmaschine

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
ATE36990T1 (de) *	1984-07-05	1988-09-15	De La Rue Giori Sa	Verfahren zum verarbeiten von wertscheinbahnen oder wertscheinbogen zu wertscheinbuendeln.
US4700627A (en) *	1986-01-28	1987-10-20	Case-Hoyt	Method and apparatus for marking defective portions of a printed web
CA2058242C (fr) *	1990-12-20	1996-12-17	Yutaka Hashimoto	Dispositif de surveillance de copies
DE4217942A1 (de) *	1992-05-30	1993-12-02	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Druck-Qualitätskontrolleinrichtung für eine Schön- und Widerdruck-Rotationsdruckmaschine
DE4321179A1 (de) *	1993-06-25	1995-01-05	Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag	Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Steuerung oder Regelung von Betriebsvorgängen einer drucktechnischen Maschine
DE4322803C2 (de) *	1993-07-08	1998-09-10	Mohndruck Reinhard Mohn Ohg	Verfahren zum Überwachen der Vollständigkeit individuell bedruckter Erzeugnisse in der Online-Fertigung
DE4432371B4 (de) *	1994-09-12	2004-12-09	Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag	Verfahren zum Drucken und Weiterverarbeiten von Nutzen
AU689680B2 (en) *	1995-02-13	1998-04-02	De La Rue Giori S.A.	Apparatus for invalidating prints printed on printing carriers
DE20010920U1 (de) *	2000-06-20	2000-09-14	MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 63075 Offenbach	Druckmaschine, insbesondere Bogenoffsetdruckmaschine
JP4616451B2 (ja) *	2000-09-22	2011-01-19	株式会社小森コーポレーション	印刷品質検査装置
DE20303574U1 (de) *	2003-03-06	2003-04-30	MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 63075 Offenbach	Bildinspektionssystem für eine Druckmaschine
DE10332211B3 (de) *	2003-07-16	2005-02-10	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Maschine zur Verarbeitung von Bogen
DE102004014549B3 (de) *	2004-03-23	2005-10-06	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE102005012913A1 (de) *	2004-03-23	2005-10-13	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Druckmaschinen mit mindestens einem mit einem Stellglied einstellbaren Maschinenelement

2005
- 2005-11-12 DE DE102005054122.4A patent/DE102005054122B4/de not_active Revoked
2006
- 2006-11-02 EP EP06022778A patent/EP1785276B1/fr not_active Revoked

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
EP2189287A3 (fr) *	2008-11-20	2012-01-18	manroland AG	Presse rotative
CN103547453A (zh) *	2010-12-27	2014-01-29	优泰克加工股份公司	用于调节和监控具有中心压印滚筒的柔性版印刷机的印刷辊的压力的系统及方法
CN103547453B (zh) *	2010-12-27	2015-12-16	优泰克加工股份公司	用于调节和监控具有中心压印滚筒的柔性版印刷机的印刷辊的压力的系统及方法
ITUB20159538A1 (it) *	2015-12-29	2017-06-29	Grafikontrol S P A	Sistema per rilevare e tracciare difetti durante le fasi di lavorazione di materiali.
WO2017115291A1 (fr) *	2015-12-29	2017-07-06	Grafikontrol S.P.A.	Système de détection et de repérage de défauts pendant les étapes de traitement de matériaux
US10525697B2 (en)	2016-07-19	2020-01-07	Koenig & Bauer Ag	Inspection system having a plurality of detection zones
CN112848676A (zh) *	2019-11-12	2021-05-28	海德堡印刷机械股份公司	经改善的页张行进监控
EP4008554A1 (fr) *	2020-12-03	2022-06-08	SWISS KRONO Tec AG	Procédé et dispositif de traitement d'un objet
WO2022117657A1 (fr) *	2020-12-03	2022-06-09	SWISS KRONO Tec AG	Procédé et dispositif de traitement d'un objet
CN116568515A (zh) *	2020-12-03	2023-08-08	瑞士克罗诺泰克股份公司	用于处理物体的方法和装置
US12397541B2 (en)	2020-12-03	2025-08-26	SWISS KRONO Tec AG	Method and device for processing an object

Also Published As

Publication number	Publication date
EP1785276A3 (fr)	2011-03-30
DE102005054122A1 (de)	2007-05-16
EP1785276B1 (fr)	2013-01-16
DE102005054122B4 (de)	2017-09-21

Legal Events

Date	Code	Title	Description
2007-04-13	PUAI	Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012
2007-05-16	AK	Designated contracting states	Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR
2007-05-16	AX	Request for extension of the european patent	Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU
2008-07-23	RAP1	Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)	Owner name: MANROLAND AG
2011-02-25	PUAL	Search report despatched	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013
2011-03-30	AK	Designated contracting states	Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR
2011-03-30	AX	Request for extension of the european patent	Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS
2011-11-09	17P	Request for examination filed	Effective date: 20110930
2011-11-23	GRAP	Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1
2011-12-07	AKX	Designation fees paid	Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR
2012-03-21	19U	Interruption of proceedings before grant	Effective date: 20120201
2012-08-08	19W	Proceedings resumed before grant after interruption of proceedings	Effective date: 20121001
2012-10-16	GRAC	Information related to communication of intention to grant a patent modified	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCIGR1
2012-10-17	GRAS	Grant fee paid	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3
2012-12-12	RAP1	Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)	Owner name: MANROLAND SHEETFED GMBH
2012-12-14	GRAA	(expected) grant	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210
2013-01-16	AK	Designated contracting states	Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR
2013-01-16	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH
2013-01-31	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP
2013-02-13	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN
2013-02-15	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 593651 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20130215
2013-03-14	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502006012426 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130314
2013-06-19	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20130116
2013-06-25	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D
2013-07-12	PLBI	Opposition filed	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260
2013-07-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130416 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130516 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130427
2013-08-14	26	Opposition filed	Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Effective date: 20130704
2013-08-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130516 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130417
2013-10-10	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502006012426 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130704
2013-10-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116
2013-11-19	PLAX	Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2
2013-11-29	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116
2013-12-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116
2014-04-03	PLAF	Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2
2014-05-31	BERE	Be: lapsed	Owner name: MANROLAND SHEETFED G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20131130
2014-06-16	PLBB	Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3
2014-07-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116
2014-08-27	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A
2014-09-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131130
2014-10-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131102
2015-01-15	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 593651 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131102
2015-02-27	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131102
2015-06-30	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130116
2015-07-31	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20061102 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131102
2015-11-19	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10
2016-03-16	RDAF	Communication despatched that patent is revoked	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1
2016-05-13	APBM	Appeal reference recorded	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO
2016-05-13	APBP	Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O
2016-05-20	APAH	Appeal reference modified	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO
2016-07-19	APBQ	Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O
2016-11-18	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11
2017-07-21	PLAB	Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO
2017-08-23	R26	Opposition filed (corrected)	Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AG Effective date: 20130704
2017-11-21	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12
2020-02-28	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 14
2020-03-31	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20191121 Year of fee payment: 14
2020-05-01	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 14
2020-12-07	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 502006012426 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 502006012426 Country of ref document: DE
2020-12-11	APBU	Appeal procedure closed	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O
2021-01-29	PGFP	Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201119 Year of fee payment: 15
2021-03-12	PLAB	Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO
2021-03-26	RDAG	Patent revoked	Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271
2021-03-26	STAA	Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent	Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED
2021-03-31	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL
2021-04-14	R26	Opposition filed (corrected)	Opponent name: KOENIG & BAUER AG Effective date: 20130704
2021-04-27	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: FI Ref legal event code: MGE
2021-04-28	27W	Patent revoked	Effective date: 20201207
2021-04-28	GBPR	Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state	Effective date: 20201207
2021-09-15	REG	Reference to a national code	Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MA03 Ref document number: 593651 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20201207
2025-08-01	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200430
2025-11-07	PG25	Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]	Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200211

Publication	Publication Date	Title
EP1454746B1 (fr)	2006-11-22	Système d'inspection d'images pour une machine d'impression
EP3456535B1 (fr)	2021-04-21	Inspection d'image des produits imprimés avec des classes d'erreur
EP2329952B1 (fr)	2012-03-21	Procédé et dispositif pour fournir des informations concernant les plaques d'impression à préparer pour une nouvelle production d'une presse d'impression
EP3085536A1 (fr)	2016-10-26	Procede de detection de buses d'impression defectueuses dans des systemes d'impression a jet d'encre
EP2902203B1 (fr)	2016-08-03	Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
DE4432371A1 (de)	1996-03-14	Verfahren zur Erfassung fehlerhafter Einzelnutzen beim Nutzendruck
EP1785276B1 (fr)	2013-01-16	Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer
DE69519843T2 (de)	2001-07-19	Gerät und Verfahren zum beidseitigen Drucken
DE20010920U1 (de)	2000-09-14	Druckmaschine, insbesondere Bogenoffsetdruckmaschine
EP1844865B1 (fr)	2009-08-19	Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets
EP2960058B1 (fr)	2017-12-20	Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande générique et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
DE102008000031B4 (de)	2014-07-10	Verfahren zur Kontrolle einer Anordnung von an Formzylindern einer Druckmaschine angeordneten Druckformen
EP2258552A2 (fr)	2010-12-08	Dispositif de détection d'un marquage sur un objet plat et procédé correspondant ainsi que dispositif destiné à la séparation de sections d'un objet plat
WO2007107234A1 (fr)	2007-09-27	Systeme de traitement d'images pour machine d'impression
EP2138304B1 (fr)	2011-01-19	Procédé de finissage de moules d'impression prêts à l'emploi sur une imprimante
DE102013217099A1 (de)	2014-03-06	Verfahren zum Erkennen eines Auftragswechsels in einem Stapel und Verwendung eines zumindest teilweise unbedruckten Bogens zum Erkennen einer Trennstelle zwischen zwei Aufträgen
DE102005037497A1 (de)	2007-02-15	Kennzeichnungssystem und Qualitäts- und Kennzeichnungsverfahren für eine Bogendruckmaschine
DE102018220971B4 (de)	2023-11-16	Verfahren zum Einrichten einer Bogendruckmaschine unter wechselnder Verwendung von Makulaturbogen und unbedruckten Bogen
DE102018220970B4 (de)	2023-11-16	Verfahren zum Einrichten einer Bogendruckmaschine unter wechselnder Verwendung von Makulaturbogen und unbedruckten Bogen
WO2005092620A2 (fr)	2005-10-06	Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires
EP3003721B1 (fr)	2017-05-10	Procédé de réimpression d'au moins un exemplaire imprimé individualisé
DE102016226171B4 (de)	2025-06-18	Auslage und Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung von Bogen in der Auslage einer bogenverarbeitenden Maschine
DE102006028482A1 (de)	2007-12-27	Vorrichtung zur Markierung von Druckbogen mit fehlerhaften Einzelnutzen beim Nutzendruck
EP2138306B1 (fr)	2011-09-28	Agencement pour délivrer des moules d'impression d'une ligne de production, à un endroit précis d'un composant d'imprimante
DE102007028379A1 (de)	2008-01-17	Verfahren zur Steuerung der Verarbeitung von auf einem Bogen gedruckten Nutzen