EP1966776B1 - Système de signalisation de danger - Google Patents
Système de signalisation de danger Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1966776B1 EP1966776B1 EP06819588.2A EP06819588A EP1966776B1 EP 1966776 B1 EP1966776 B1 EP 1966776B1 EP 06819588 A EP06819588 A EP 06819588A EP 1966776 B1 EP1966776 B1 EP 1966776B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation units
- evaluation
- units
- alarm system
- alarm
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Revoked
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/009—Signalling of the alarm condition to a substation whose identity is signalled to a central station, e.g. relaying alarm signals in order to extend communication range
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/01—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium
- G08B25/04—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium using a single signalling line, e.g. in a closed loop
Definitions
- the invention relates to a danger detection system for buildings with evaluation units designed as freely programmable control units.
- the publication WO 97/26635 discloses a fire alarm system having a fire control station communicating with a plurality of intelligent communication nodes via a network.
- the intelligent communication nodes are signal-wise connected to a plurality of peripheral devices.
- the publication DE 38 26 895 C2 relates to a Subscribeldestrom with a central control unit and a plurality of control and signaling elements, actuators and signaling elements, which are connected via a common bus, wherein the central control unit, the control and signaling members, the actuators and the signaling elements are arranged parallel to each other signal technology.
- the danger detection system for buildings has the advantage that the hazard detection system can be used flexibly and adapted to the respective local conditions of use. It is particularly advantageous that the security-specific parameters of the fire, burglary and emergency call area, provided by respective detectors, are selectively and quickly assessable by the evaluation units in the area of the respective location. At the same time, the danger alarm system described has the advantage that large distances, in particular of several kilometers, could be bridged by the evaluation units connected in series (daisy chain). This contributes in a particularly advantageous manner to the fact that the alarm system described is used both for monitoring in the area of municipalities, such as hospitals and nursing homes, as well as in public, such as escape door control, and private areas can be used to secure housing.
- the danger detection system has the advantage that small autonomous and self-contained security areas are connected via the connection to a building management system with large systems by the design of the evaluation as a freely programmable controller (FPS) and connection of local safety buses. It is particularly advantageous that the evaluation units are connected to the building management system to a ring, as this contributes to increase the reliability of the danger detection system.
- FPS freely programmable controller
- FIG. 1 shows a danger alarm system for buildings.
- the following describes a hazard alarm system for buildings with evaluation units designed as programmable control units and a building management system.
- evaluation units designed as programmable control units and a building management system.
- the evaluation units are connected to the building management system via a fast data connection.
- FIG. 1 shows a hazard detection system 1 for buildings, comprising a plurality of programmable controllers (FPS) trained evaluation 2, 22 and a building management system 10.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 are characterized in that they have a large number of inputs and programmable programmable outputs. Furthermore, the evaluation units 2, 22 comprise a microprocessor, as well as nonvolatile and volatile memory units.
- the non-volatile storage devices are read-only memories (ROM) or rewritable ROM, such as an EPROM.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 are designed such that a processing program that combines the inputs of the inputs with output signals of the outputs, is freely programmable and stored in the non-volatile memory units.
- the volatile memory devices are Random Access Memories (RAM), which are used to cache data from the processing program.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 have four interfaces 7 of a first type, which are designed to connect a building security bus 3.
- the building security bus 3 is preferably the known security bus LSN (Local Security Network).
- the building security busses 3 are connected as a ring to the interface 7 of the first type.
- the building security busses 3 are designed such that fire detectors 4 combined with other types of detectors, such as burglar alarm 5 and / or alarm 6, on the building security bus 3 are operable.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 comprise an interface 8 of the second type, which is designed to provide a high data transmission rate.
- the data transfer rate is preferably 9600 bit / s or more.
- the interfaces 8 of the second type each comprise two optocouplers 9 which are designed in such a way that the evaluation units 2, 22 are in each case galvanically decoupled from data lines 11, 12 connected to their interface 8 for producing the data connection.
- a first evaluation unit 2 is connected via its interface 8 of the second type and an optocoupler 9 via a data line 11 with a second identically constructed second evaluation unit 22 by means of its interface 8 of the second type and its optocoupler 9 connected in series.
- Both evaluation units 2, 22 have the above-mentioned interfaces 7 of the first type, which are designed so that the four building security buses have a total length of 1000 m, with a total of up to 127 detectors of different types, in particular fire detector 4, burglar alarm 5 and / or emergency call 6, are connected.
- the second evaluation unit 22 is connected via the interface 8 of the second type and its optocoupler 9 via a data line with other not shown, but substantially identical evaluation and finally with a building management system 10.
- the building management system 10 also includes an interface 8 of the second type with two optocouplers 9 for connecting two data lines 11, 12.
- the building management systems 10 via the second optocoupler 9 and a second data line 12 with the optocoupler 9 of the interface 8 of the first evaluation 2 connected so that the connected Evaluation units 2, 22 and the building management system 10 form a ring.
- the training as a ring is not absolutely necessary, but advantageous in terms of reliability of the hazard detection system 1.
- the building management system 10 is designed in such a way that, in addition to the data of the evaluation units 2, 22, it processes data from further trades, in particular access control systems and / or heating and ventilation systems and / or video systems and / or public address systems.
- the building management system 10 is a computer-aided operating and information system, which ensures safe operation and action initiation in the event of an alarm.
- the length of the data lines 11, 12 between two evaluation units 2, 22 or between an evaluation unit 2, 22 and the building management system 10 is between 500 and 1000 meters.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 are essentially identical in terms of the interfaces 7, 8 and the further inputs and outputs. Only the processing programs are adapted to the particular conditions of the connected detectors and the localities.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 are characterized in that the evaluation units 2, 22 are designed in such a way that they process and evaluate the safety-specific characteristics of the connected detectors by means of the processing programs adapted to the respective situation.
- the evaluation units 2, 22 evaluate the signals transmitted by the detectors via the building security bus 3 and generate digitally coded alarm messages as a function of the signals.
- each evaluation unit 2, 22 provide the alarm messages received by a further evaluation unit 2, 22 at the second interfaces 8 for forwarding to the building management system 10.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
Claims (8)
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) pour bâtiments comprenant des unités d'interprétation (2, 22) réalisées sous la forme d'unité de commande programmables librement (FPS), les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) présentant au moins une première interface (7) avec un bus de sécurité du bâtiment (3), caractérisé en ce que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) présentent des deuxièmes interfaces (8) pour la délivrance d'un débit de transmission de données élevé et en ce qu'une liaison de données est établie entre le système de gestion du bâtiment (10) et une première unité d'interprétation (2) par le biais des deuxièmes interfaces (8) par connexion en série avec au moins une deuxième unité d'interprétation (22).
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les deuxièmes interfaces (8) comprennent un optocoupleur (9) configuré de telle sorte que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) sont découplées galvaniquement d'une ligne de données (11, 12) raccordée à leur deuxième interface (8) pour établir la liaison de données.
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que la ligne de données (11, 12) présente entre deux unités d'interprétation (2, 22) et/ou entre les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) et le système de gestion du bâtiment (10) une longueur comprise entre 500 et 1000 mètres.
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) et le système de gestion du bâtiment (10) sont reliés pour former un anneau.
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que des avertisseurs, notamment des avertisseurs d'incendie (4) et/ou des avertisseurs d'intrusion (5) et/ou des avertisseurs d'appel de détresse (6) sont raccordés au bus de sécurité du bâtiment (3).
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) interprètent les signaux transmis par les avertisseurs par le biais du bus de sécurité du bâtiment (3), génèrent des messages d'alarme codés numériquement en fonction des signaux et délivrent les messages d'alarme sur la deuxième interface (8) en vue de leur transmission au système de gestion du bâtiment (10).
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon la revendication 6, caractérisé en ce que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) sont configurées de telle sorte que les unités d'interprétation (2, 22) délivrent les messages d'alarme reçus de la part d'une unité d'interprétation (2, 22) supplémentaire aux deuxièmes interfaces (8) en vue de leur transmission au système de gestion du bâtiment (10).
- Système avertisseur de danger (1) selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la première unité d'interprétation (2) et les unités d'interprétation supplémentaires (22) ont une structure pour l'essentiel identique.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102005062129A DE102005062129A1 (de) | 2005-12-23 | 2005-12-23 | Gefahrenmeldesystem |
| PCT/EP2006/068620 WO2007073991A1 (fr) | 2005-12-23 | 2006-11-17 | Système de signalisation de danger |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP1966776A1 EP1966776A1 (fr) | 2008-09-10 |
| EP1966776B1 true EP1966776B1 (fr) | 2013-10-16 |
Family
ID=37600982
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP06819588.2A Revoked EP1966776B1 (fr) | 2005-12-23 | 2006-11-17 | Système de signalisation de danger |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US7671731B2 (fr) |
| EP (1) | EP1966776B1 (fr) |
| DE (1) | DE102005062129A1 (fr) |
| WO (1) | WO2007073991A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7956735B2 (en) | 2006-05-15 | 2011-06-07 | Cernium Corporation | Automated, remotely-verified alarm system with intrusion and video surveillance and digital video recording |
| WO2009012289A1 (fr) * | 2007-07-16 | 2009-01-22 | Cernium Corporation | Appareil et procédés de vérification d'alarme vidéo |
| DE102014214344A1 (de) | 2014-07-23 | 2016-01-28 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Brandmeldevorrichtung, Verfahren zur Übertragung von Daten mit der Brandmeldevorrichtung sowie Computerprogramm |
| EP3035311B1 (fr) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-10-09 | Novar GmbH | Dispositif maître de bus pour un système d'avertissement de danger et système d'avertissement de danger utilisant celui-ci |
| DE202014011531U1 (de) | 2014-12-19 | 2021-12-14 | Novar Gmbh | Bus-Master-Vorrichtung für ein Gefahrenmeldesystem und ein Gefahrenmeldesystem, das diese Vorrichtung verwendet |
| CN109478362B (zh) * | 2016-04-08 | 2021-10-08 | 泰科消防产品有限合伙公司 | 模块化且可扩展型火灾抑制系统 |
Family Cites Families (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5402298A (en) | 1983-12-05 | 1995-03-28 | Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Shock hazard protection system |
| DE3826895A1 (de) * | 1988-08-08 | 1990-03-08 | Heiland Bernd | Fernwirk und/oder fernmelde-anlage |
| GB9021484D0 (en) * | 1990-10-03 | 1990-11-14 | Univ Strathclyde | Gas insulated substations |
| AU1829797A (en) | 1996-01-16 | 1997-08-11 | Firecom, Inc. | A networked, distributed fire alarm system |
| DE10105189A1 (de) | 2001-02-06 | 2002-08-29 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Überwachungsgerät |
| DE10127057B4 (de) | 2001-06-02 | 2005-03-10 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Gefahrenmeldezentrale |
| US7106193B2 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2006-09-12 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Integrated alarm detection and verification device |
-
2005
- 2005-12-23 DE DE102005062129A patent/DE102005062129A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2006
- 2006-11-17 US US11/908,561 patent/US7671731B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-11-17 EP EP06819588.2A patent/EP1966776B1/fr not_active Revoked
- 2006-11-17 WO PCT/EP2006/068620 patent/WO2007073991A1/fr not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2007073991A1 (fr) | 2007-07-05 |
| EP1966776A1 (fr) | 2008-09-10 |
| DE102005062129A1 (de) | 2007-06-28 |
| US20080246600A1 (en) | 2008-10-09 |
| US7671731B2 (en) | 2010-03-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| DE102010009775A1 (de) | Schaltschranküberwachungseinrichtung | |
| CH664637A5 (de) | Verfahren zur uebertragung von messwerten in einem ueberwachungssystem. | |
| CH628191A5 (de) | Datenuebertragungsanlage mit in einer geschlossenen schleife angeordneten einheiten. | |
| DE102015118151A1 (de) | Sicherheitssensor zur Überwachung der Betriebssicherheit einer Anlage | |
| EP1966776B1 (fr) | Système de signalisation de danger | |
| WO2010000334A1 (fr) | Liaison redondante d'éléments de réseau radio avec une centrale | |
| DE29901302U1 (de) | Netzwerkteilnehmer | |
| DE2427213A1 (de) | Steuereinrichtung | |
| WO2016113098A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de blocage et de signalisation d'une section de voie équipée de compteurs d'essieux | |
| DE102011117896B4 (de) | Sicherheitsgerichteter Slave für ein Actuator-Sensor-Interface (AS-i) System | |
| EP1703481B1 (fr) | Procédé pour déterminer la configuration d'un système d'alarme et système d'alarme | |
| DE4426466C2 (de) | Anordnung und Verfahren zum Betreiben von Gefahrenmeldern | |
| DE19815148B4 (de) | Sensoranordnung | |
| EP1780516B1 (fr) | Procédé pour établir un réseau à capteurs | |
| DE102012003584A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung einer Gefahrenmeldeanlage und Gefahrenmeldeanlage | |
| DE102017209937B4 (de) | System und Verfahren zum gewaltfreien Öffnen einer Tür durch die Feuerwehr | |
| AT407679B (de) | Fernüberwachungssystem | |
| DE4445465A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Auswertung von Signalen einer Gefahrenmeldeanlage | |
| DE4344120C1 (de) | Verfahren zur Erhöhung der Störsicherheit einer Funkalarmanlage | |
| EP4216184B1 (fr) | Système d'alerte | |
| WO2006106037A1 (fr) | Systeme d'alarme par radio | |
| EP1449990A1 (fr) | Méthode et dispositif pour surveiller un édifice | |
| EP3681109B1 (fr) | Procédé de détection d'une condition d'un participant dans un bus de communication, système de bus de communication, système de verrouillage doté d'un système de bus de communication et émetteur-récepteur | |
| DE1802999C (de) | Schaltungsanordnung fur zentralge steuerte Vermittlungsanlagen, insbesondere Fernsprechvermittlungsanlagen, mit jeweils mindestens einem Programm und/oder Zu Standsspeicher | |
| DE19539989C1 (de) | Alarmanlage mit erhöhter Störsicherheit |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080723 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20110309 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: G08B0025140000 Ipc: G08B0025000000 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G08B 25/00 20060101AFI20130415BHEP Ipc: G08B 25/04 20060101ALN20130415BHEP |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20130528 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB SE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20131212 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20131016 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
| PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
| 26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: NOVAR GMBH Effective date: 20140716 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140716 |
|
| PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20161124 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20161124 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20170126 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 502006013285 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
| RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
| 27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20170627 |
|
| GBPR | Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state |
Effective date: 20170627 |