EP2033151A1 - Verfahren und system - Google Patents
Verfahren und systemInfo
- Publication number
- EP2033151A1 EP2033151A1 EP05801466A EP05801466A EP2033151A1 EP 2033151 A1 EP2033151 A1 EP 2033151A1 EP 05801466 A EP05801466 A EP 05801466A EP 05801466 A EP05801466 A EP 05801466A EP 2033151 A1 EP2033151 A1 EP 2033151A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- design
- product
- manufacturer
- database
- customer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
- G06Q30/0603—Catalogue creation or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
Definitions
- the present invention pertains to a method and system for manufacturing of products whose design is specified individually by a set of independent customers through means of connected customer, manufacturer and product design databases.
- the present invention relates to a method and system for manufacturing of products whose design is specified individually by a set of independent customers.
- One aspect of the invention is to provide such a method and system enabling a manufacturing of customer designed products where both product cost and manufacturing time is optimized.
- the present invention provides a method for manufacturing of products whose design is specified individually by a set of independent customers.
- the method comprises the steps of:
- clustering of potentially similar product designs stored in said design database according to clustering parameters; searching and scoring of potential manufacturers for manufacturing of the clustered similar products in the manufacturer database according to scoring parameters;
- an offer for product manufacturing is sent to manufacturers scored in the database according to the scoring parameters and contracts are initialized for production and deliverance of a certain amount of the products to their respective customers for manufacturers accepting the offer.
- clustering parameters are related to at least one of product size, product shape, product material and product type.
- scoring parameters are at least one of product type, product price, time limit for product deliverance and product manufacturing location.
- the design interface means is based on at least one of free text, dedicated design language and dedicated design tools.
- a maximum price for a product is specified and stored in the design database.
- a further embodiment of the method according to the present invention comprises that a maximum time limit for the maximum price to be valid is specified and stored in the design database.
- the manufacturer specific data include at least one of production capability data and production location data.
- the present invention sets forth a system for manufacturing of products whose design is specified individually by a set of independent customers.
- the system comprises:
- clustering means for clustering of potentially similar product designs stored in said design database according to clustering parameters
- matching means for searching and scoring of potential manufacturers for manufacturing of said clustered similar products in said manufacturer database according to scoring parameters; and wherein an offer for product manufacturing is sent to manufacturers matching said scoring parameters in said manufacturer database and contracts are initialized between customers of the clustered products and the manufacturers accepting said offer, wherein the contract stipulates at least one of an amount of products to be delivered, product cost and time limit for the product deliverance.
- One embodiment of the system according to the invention comprises a contract means for establishing said contracts according to requisites agreed upon by said manufacturers and customers.
- Another embodiment of the system according to the invention further comprises a negotiation means for providing a manufacturer versus customer negotiation support for reaching an agreement between contracting parties.
- Fig. 1 schematically in a flowchart shows a registration of customer data into a customer database
- Fig. 2 schematically in a flowchart shows a registration of manufacturer data into a manufacturer database.
- Fig. 3 in a flowchart illustrates an embodiment of the invention in which a customer specifies a desired product design which is stored into the design data base;
- Fig. 4 in a flowchart illustrates a flow of events beginning with a clustering of potential product designs leading to a produced and delivered product. Detailed description of preferred embodiments
- the present invention sets forth method and a system for manufacturing of products whose design and/or price are specified individually by a set of independent customers.
- a customer profile of at least one customer of the set is registered through inputting customer specific data into a customer database.
- a manufacturer profile of at least one manufacturer is registered through inputting manufacturer specific data into a manufacturer database.
- a desired product design is specified through a design interface and stored in a design database.
- Potentially similar product designs stored in the design database are then clustered according to clustering parameters.
- a matching of potential manufacturers for manufacturing of the clustered similar products is performed in the manufacturer database according to scoring parameters.
- an offer for product manufacturing is sent to manufacturers scored in the database according to the scoring parameters and contracts are initialized for production and deliverance of a certain amount of the products to their respective customers for manufacturers accepting the offer.
- the actual specification details and price may differ between different customers.
- the system keeps a data base of the customers and the design requirements specified by the customers.
- the data base also contains data about registered manufacturers and keeps updated information about each manufacturer's abilities to produce certain types of products.
- Each customer who wants a specific product with specific properties uses a design interface alternatively a specific description language to specify the desired properties of the desired product.
- a design specified may either be new, identical to an earlier specified design or build upon earlier designs.
- the customer also specifies the maximum price the customer is prepared to pay for this product, and may also specify the maximum time period within which this desired product is wanted. The customer may also specify the maximum time period within which the maximum price specified is valid, alternatively specify how the maximum price may develop over time. As long as each individual customer has not been offered any product by any manufacturer the individual customer may change the desired design or the maximum price the specific customer is prepared to pay.
- Similarity measures are used to collect groups or clusters of customers who are close from which an average product design can be extracted.
- a group may consist of one to an arbitrary amount of customers.
- the calculation of the average product design may be weighted according to each customer's maximum price level.
- the system may then through inherent means score the potential manufacturers stored in the data base from a logistic viewpoint, the desired price level and earlier viability scores based upon how this manufacturer could keep contracts.
- Manufacturers or entrepreneurs who are looking for customers may search the data base for potential products which are within the range of products this manufacturer is able to produce.
- the system can also assist the manufacturer or entrepreneur in finding manufacturers who can collaborate in producing a certain desired product, based upon each registered manufacturer's profile. When a manufacturer or a set of collaborating manufacturers have found that they are able to produce a certain product with a reasonable cost profit balance, the system helps the manufacturer or entrepreneur to negotiate with the set of customers who want a certain product.
- Fig. 1 is schematically illustrated a registration of customer data into a customer database.
- Fig. 2 is schematically illustrated a registration of manufacturer data into a manufacturer database.
- FIG. 3 an embodiment of the invention is shown where a customer selects from a variety of different interfaces such as free text, dedicated design languages or dedicated design tools to specify a desired design which is stored into the design data base.
- Fig. 4 illustrates an embodiment of the invention where a clustering of potential product designs initially is performed. A scoring or matching of potential manufacturers is then performed and offers are sent to different manufacturers scored. These manufacturers then accept, possibly after some negotiation with the customers, supported by means of the system. Contracts are then initialized or established through means of the system and the product can be produced and delivered accordingly.
- Means mentioned in the present description can be software means, hardware means or a combination of both.
- the design may be specified by free text, including structured text like XML/SGML, dedicated design languages for particular areas or by using dedicated design tools.
- free text such as abstracts and keywords.
- An abstract is used for instance when specifying a project, like a research project, or as a free form to specify a product which may come from any combination of the areas above.
- a textual or other form of description of the desired product may need different ways of describing different aspects of the product. These may be aspects like topology, in for e.g. mechanical, mechatronic, optical, software and molecular designs. It may also be aspects like desired ranges for product parts, like effect, voltage, frequency, bandwidth, size, energy capacity etc.
- Clustering is used to find groups of abstracts which are close.
- a specific customer design may be a member of several clusters with varying probabilities. Keywords used in the design can be used to explicitly control whether a specific design belongs to a specific cluster or not, by specifying "not" before a keyword.
- Some preprocessing is first done, to find synonyms and features (i.e. parts which always occur together). For instance “wearable” and “portable” have similar meanings, but the terms can also be graded like saying “wearable” > “portable” in the scoring process. That is “wearable” is more worth than “portable”.
- Designs may be described in dedicated modeling languages for each type of design, for mechanical, optical, molecular and related types of designs the parts are specified by their desired properties. Not usually by giving explicit components but by specifying what ranges, what performance, what dimensions etc are desirable. These designs are clustered and preprocessed until a conceptual design is achieved. These conceptual designs can either be transformed into drawings by applied type theory or by entrepreneurs who can act as agents between the product specification and the manufacturers which will produce the actual design.
- a customer may specify:
- the system When the system receives this specification, it will first check unfinished research projects. If the design description is close to an unfinished research project the customer is hinted about that there is such a project, and is offered the possibility to sponsor this project.
- Example on using previous product designs as basis for new product specifications Each design which once has been identified or manufactured may be used as parts or reference in new designs. Each part or product design will then be available in a wiki like format where the customer can verify that each earlier product referenced in a new design specification fulfills the desired properties. The customer may also get estimates of expected price and expected delivery time for each part based upon earlier manufacturing statistics. Assume that the design "Wearable aircleaner with rechargeable batteries, with HEPA filter, with transparent mask" above was manufactured and then given the identifier WACHRTM.
- a customer may then specify: "WACHRTM with autostart induced by autodetection of dangerous particles in surrounding air.”
- a product design which was not previously manufactured through the system may still be used as a reference in new product designs.
- a T610 (a Sony-Ericsson mobile manufactured year 2003) is used.
- a customer may then specify:
- Fiber optic display is defined in the data base, that the desired protocol is not specified and the customer may then get the option to specify e.g "optical 3D DVI" from a selection.
- optical 3D DVI optical 3D DVI
- a previously known product is used as a reference to a complex part, which implies that the customer does not need to specify any details about this part, which implies that any design has DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) properties.
- Each design specification may consist of several parts. These parts may be referred to by the use of local labels, by assigning a name to each design which may then be cross referenced in the design. Below is an example of a design which uses local labels. As this is in fact a hierarchical description XML or similar would be more relevant, but free text is used here for illustration purpose as it is easier to read.
- a communication device partly injected in the users brain which utilizes a transceiver NANOTRANS which communicates with a slave device PHOTOBARRAGE which translates the input/output stream of data with the help of a WEARCOMP which allows the user to directly exchange information brain to brain or brain to computer or with a selected set of remote brains or computers.
- a molecular device which uses energy from surrounding ATP and reacts upon specific transmittor substances and transform these into short photon barrages at a specific frequency.
- a molecular device which uses energy from the surrounding ATP and reacts upon short photon barrages at specific frequencies and for each barrage received synthesizes a specific amount of transmittor substance which stimulates local brain cells.
- Label PHOTOBARRAGE
- a nano electronic device which is sending and receiving on a wide set of frequencies using short photon barrages, which are transformed into an input/output stream of data.
- Label WEARCOMP A general wearable computer, as specified elsewhere.
- a general design description in free text is seen as a list of components where certain attributes like "with”, “in”, “which”, “uses” etc are used as semantic markers implying that a very simple parser, not requiring natural language understanding, is used.
- a topological description may also be specified in text but for topology there are formal languages which are better suited for this, customized for different design areas.
- a design specification may also be supplied with a drawing or a detailed description in a specific design language for each specific area. As design languages usually are hierarchical such design languages demand less feature detection than free text as the non linear dependencies are already compensated for in the hierarchical structure of the language.
- design languages This is a non exhaustive list of design languages which may be used for specific areas, apart from the general free text format which is mostly suitable for abstract descriptions.
- NANOPT -for spec of nano optical devices NASTRAN -for mechanical design
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/SE2005/001680 WO2007055618A2 (en) | 2005-11-09 | 2005-11-09 | Method and a system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2033151A1 true EP2033151A1 (de) | 2009-03-11 |
| EP2033151A4 EP2033151A4 (de) | 2010-04-14 |
Family
ID=38023703
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP05801466A Withdrawn EP2033151A4 (de) | 2005-11-09 | 2005-11-09 | Verfahren und system |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP2033151A4 (de) |
| WO (1) | WO2007055618A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US10798211B2 (en) | 2018-02-13 | 2020-10-06 | Ebay Inc. | Generating attribute preference models based on disparate attribute spectrums |
| US12141816B2 (en) * | 2020-05-05 | 2024-11-12 | Global Sourcing Network LLC | Systems and methods for interconnecting manufacturing nodes and consumer end points |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030208365A1 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2003-11-06 | Avery Randall N | On-line design of distribution transformers |
| US20040122691A1 (en) * | 2001-03-07 | 2004-06-24 | Thomas Lupp | Method and device for ordering products in particular motor vehicles |
| US20050038553A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2005-02-17 | York International Corporation | System and method for managing the production of a custom designed product |
-
2005
- 2005-11-09 EP EP05801466A patent/EP2033151A4/de not_active Withdrawn
- 2005-11-09 WO PCT/SE2005/001680 patent/WO2007055618A2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2007055618A2 (en) | 2007-05-18 |
| EP2033151A4 (de) | 2010-04-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Fensel et al. | OIL: An ontology infrastructure for the semantic web | |
| Ma et al. | Personalized scientific paper recommendation based on heterogeneous graph representation | |
| US8438074B2 (en) | System and method for electronic commerce and other uses | |
| US8484083B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for targeting messages to users in a social network | |
| CN104809632B (zh) | 一种基于模板的动态广告的生成方法和装置 | |
| CN110009401A (zh) | 基于用户画像的广告投放方法、装置和存储介质 | |
| Chen et al. | Enhanced discrete multi-modal hashing: More constraints yet less time to learn | |
| CN101385025A (zh) | 通过分析内容确定上下文并且基于该上下文提供相关内容 | |
| Serrano | Neural networks in big data and Web search | |
| CN101582073A (zh) | 一种基于领域本体的智能检索系统及方法 | |
| TW200917070A (en) | System and method to facilitate matching of content to advertising information in a network | |
| Skoutas et al. | A ranking mechanism for semanticweb service discovery | |
| Govindarajan et al. | Intelligent collaborative patent mining using excessive topic generation | |
| Yannam et al. | Enhancing the accuracy of group recommendation using slope one: VR Yannam et al. | |
| Li et al. | HHMF: hidden hierarchical matrix factorization for recommender systems: H. Li et al. | |
| Zhou et al. | A smart tourism recommendation algorithm based on cellular geospatial clustering and multivariate weighted collaborative filtering | |
| Serrano | Intelligent recommender system for big data applications based on the random neural network | |
| Chen et al. | Hotspot information network and domain knowledge graph aggregation in heterogeneous network for literature recommendation | |
| CN115660783A (zh) | 模型训练方法、商品推荐方法、装置、设备及介质 | |
| Wang et al. | A feature-based assembly information modeling method for complex products’ 3D assembly design | |
| Hao et al. | A decision-making method for design schemes based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and prospect theory | |
| Pai et al. | On ontology-based tourist knowledge representation and recommendation | |
| Mo et al. | A knowledge graph-based implicit requirement mining method in personalized product development | |
| US20090210350A1 (en) | Method and a system | |
| EP2033151A1 (de) | Verfahren und system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAJ | Public notification under rule 129 epc |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009425 |
|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20081216 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
| A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20100312 |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G06Q 10/00 20060101ALI20100308BHEP Ipc: G06Q 30/00 20060101AFI20070709BHEP |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
| 18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20100610 |