EP2645347A1 - Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol - Google Patents

Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2645347A1
EP2645347A1 EP12002335.3A EP12002335A EP2645347A1 EP 2645347 A1 EP2645347 A1 EP 2645347A1 EP 12002335 A EP12002335 A EP 12002335A EP 2645347 A1 EP2645347 A1 EP 2645347A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
unit
theft
electronic equipment
protection
protection unit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP12002335.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Peter Mr. Öhman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority to EP12002335.3A priority Critical patent/EP2645347A1/fr
Priority to US13/853,102 priority patent/US20130263291A1/en
Publication of EP2645347A1 publication Critical patent/EP2645347A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • G06F21/70Protecting specific internal or peripheral components, in which the protection of a component leads to protection of the entire computer
    • G06F21/88Detecting or preventing theft or loss
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/14Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles
    • G08B13/1409Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles for removal detection of electrical appliances by detecting their physical disconnection from an electrical system, e.g. using a switch incorporated in the plug connector
    • G08B13/1418Removal detected by failure in electrical connection between the appliance and a control centre, home control panel or a power supply
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B21/00Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for
    • G08B21/02Alarms for ensuring the safety of persons
    • G08B21/0202Child monitoring systems using a transmitter-receiver system carried by the parent and the child
    • G08B21/0205Specific application combined with child monitoring using a transmitter-receiver system
    • G08B21/0213System disabling if a separation threshold is exceeded
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08BSIGNALLING SYSTEMS, e.g. PERSONAL CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/02Monitoring continuously signalling or alarm systems
    • G08B29/06Monitoring of the line circuits, e.g. signalling of line faults
    • G08B29/08Signalling of tampering with the line circuit

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to an apparatus and a method for supporting theft protection of an equipment with some electronic feature or function.
  • a solution has been developed which involves a protection unit capable of detecting and reporting position, typically using the well-known Global Positioning System, GPS, which unit can be mounted on or inside the electronic equipment.
  • This type of protection unit is typically configured to send an alarm to a surveillance centre or the like when an abnormal position is detected by the unit.
  • the "abnormal" position in this context may be a position outside a predefined allowed area or spot where the equipment should be situated at normal conditions. Otherwise, it can be assumed that the equipment has been stolen and taken somewhere else, i.e. to an abnormal position.
  • the protection unit may issue an alarm once it detects that the engine is moved from that place when being stolen.
  • the protection unit can thus notify the surveillance centre as soon as the equipment is moved and also provide its current whereabouts in the form of GPS coordinates to enable tracking of the stolen equipment.
  • an apparatus for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment when using a protection unit adapted to communicate with a surveillance centre when it is detected that the electronic equipment has been stolen.
  • the apparatus comprises a communication unit adapted to transmit control signals indicating whether the protection unit is working in a predefined manner, basically meaning that the electronic equipment can be assumed not to have been stolen.
  • the apparatus also comprises a fault detector adapted to receive the control signals and to indicate a fault when detecting that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner depending on the control signals, and an operation control unit adapted to disable the electronic equipment in response to the indicated fault.
  • a method for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment when using a protection unit adapted to communicate with a surveillance centre when it is detected that the electronic equipment has been stolen.
  • control signals are transmitted from a communication unit at the protection unit indicating whether the protection unit is working in a predefined manner. Further, a fault is indicated when detecting that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner depending on the control signals, and the electronic equipment is disabled in response to the indicated fault.
  • the above apparatus and method can be used to achieve that the electronic equipment is made more or less useless once it is detected that it has been stolen. Assuming that any potential thieves are aware of this, e.g. by putting an informative tag, label, sticker or the like on the equipment, they will not be motivated to steal the equipment in the first place.
  • the communication unit may be further adapted to transmit control signals indicating that the protection unit or the surveillance centre has detected theft of the electronic equipment.
  • the fault detector may then be further adapted to indicate said theft, and in that case, the operation control unit is further adapted to disable the electronic equipment in response to the indicated theft.
  • the fault detector may be further adapted to detect that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner when no control signals can be received from the communication unit, or when the communication unit transmits a fault notification indicating any of: the protection unit is not able to determine a position, the protection unit is not able to issue any alarm or respond to polling, and the protection unit is not able to connect to a communication network.
  • the fault detector may indicate any detected fault or theft by emitting a signal or pulse that triggers the operation control unit to disable the electronic equipment.
  • the protection unit itself may comprise a position detector adapted to determine the position based on satellite signals, and an alarm unit adapted to send said alarm or respond to polling over a communication network.
  • the communication unit could be inseparably integrated with the protection unit, and the fault detector and the operation control unit could also be inseparably integrated with the electronic equipment.
  • the communication unit and the fault detector are further adapted to communicate said control signals using encrypted communication. Thereby, the control signals cannot be "faked" by another sender.
  • the communication unit may be further adapted to transmit the control signals when queried by the fault detector, e.g. using a challenge and response procedure or the like.
  • the communication unit and the fault detector may be further adapted to communicate said control signals using short range wireless communication, such as Bluetooth, Near Field Communication (NFC), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), infrared or any other useful wireless signalling mechanism over a short distance.
  • short range wireless communication such as Bluetooth, Near Field Communication (NFC), Radio Frequency Identification (RFID), infrared or any other useful wireless signalling mechanism over a short distance.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an apparatus for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment, according to some possible embodiments.
  • Fig 2 is a block diagram illustrating another variant of an apparatus for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment, according to further possible embodiments.
  • Fig. 3 is a flow chart illustrating a procedure in an apparatus for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment, according to further possible embodiments.
  • Fig. 4 is a flow chart illustrating in more detail a procedure in an apparatus for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment, according to further possible embodiments.
  • a solution is provided to make it less attractive or even pointless to steal an electronic equipment, particularly when the electronic equipment is provided with a protection unit adapted to communicate with a surveillance centre, e.g. by sending an alarm or similar, when it is detected that the electronic equipment has been stolen.
  • the electronic equipment could be any device, machine, appliance or product with some functionality and/or operational features that can be controlled electronically.
  • the protection unit is able to check and sense that the protection unit is working as it should, i.e. in a predefined manner, and in that case transmit control signals which are received by a fault detector installed at the electronic equipment. Those control signals thus effectively acknowledge that the protection unit is all right.
  • the protection unit is able to act as expected and to communicate with a surveillance centre or the like, e.g. by issuing an alarm when an abnormal position is detected or when the protection unit is moved, shaken or stirred, or when a motion sensor detects presence of an unexpected person, etc.
  • the protection unit may comprise a GPS function, a shake sensor and/or a motion sensor or the like.
  • the protection unit can be designed and configured in various different ways to detect theft and the solution is not limited to the above examples of GPS, shake sensor and motion sensor.
  • a thief tries to remove or demolish the protection unit, it will no longer work in the predefined manner which can thus be detected by the fault detector depending on the control signals as follows. For example, if the protection unit is separated from the electronic equipment or demolished, the fault detector will no longer receive control signals which thus implies that the protection unit does not work in the predefined manner. In this respect, a delay may be employed, as mentioned above, such that a fault is assumed once a certain period of time has elapsed without receiving control signals, e.g. in the range of a few hours or a day.
  • the protection unit may not be able to determine a position such as when the electronic equipment is brought to a location where it is not possible to receive GPS signals. In another example, the protection unit may not be able to issue any alarm, and/or to connect to a communication network such as when its function for external communication has been put out of order or when the electronic equipment is brought to a location where it is not possible to contact an external communication network such as an underground room, basement or similar.
  • the protection unit does not work in the predefined manner and the communication unit may therefore transmit a fault notification in some way in the control signals to the fault detector to indicate a fault at the protection unit, e.g. any of the above malfunctions.
  • the fault notification may be effectuated as an explicit fault message or a specific signal or code indicating the fault.
  • the fault notification may also be effectuated as a noticeable change in the sending of control signals, e.g. by stopping sending them altogether, as long as the fault detector is able to detect that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner depending on the control signals.
  • the communication unit transmits control signals indicating that the protection unit has detected theft of the electronic equipment, e.g. detecting an abnormal situation where it is likely that the equipment is being stolen.
  • the protection unit has detected theft of the electronic equipment by means of a notification from the surveillance centre, e.g. in case the owner of the equipment has himself reported the theft to the surveillance centre.
  • the fault detector may in either case indicate the theft such that the operation control unit disables the electronic equipment in response to the indicated theft.
  • the fault detector may indicate the above-detected fault or theft by emitting a signal or pulse that triggers the operation control unit to disable the electronic equipment.
  • FIG. 1 An electronic equipment 100 is illustrated schematically and is assumed to have some functionality and/or operational feature(s) that can be controlled electronically.
  • the equipment 100 is protected from theft by means of a protection unit 102, installed at the electronic equipment 100, which may use GPS or a shake or motion sensor for detecting theft, e.g. according to some conventional technique.
  • a "theft detector” 102a is schematically shown which may be configured to determine its position by receiving GPS signals, indicated by an action 1.1a, or by being sensitive to movements or shakings, indicated by another action 1.1b, or in any other useful manner.
  • the theft detector may also be sensitive to movements of a person located beside the equipment, like a "motion detector", which could of course be deactivated by the equipment owner using a key or similar.
  • the theft detector 102a Whenever theft of the equipment is detected, the theft detector 102a triggers an alarm unit 102b to issue an alarm which is sent to a surveillance centre 104 over an external communication network 106, in a conventional manner, e.g. using a wireless communication technique. It is also possible that the alarm unit 102b can indicate an alarm by using a "polling" procedure, such that the alarm unit is now and then polled by the surveillance centre 104, e.g. at regular intervals, and the alarm is indicated when the alarm unit 102b does not respond to the polling.
  • the protection unit 102 may also be designed for activation and deactivation by a user, which is however outside the scope of this solution.
  • the apparatus of this solution further involves a fault detector 110 which can be installed at the electronic equipment 100.
  • the fault detector 110 When installed, the fault detector 110 may be more or less inseparably integrated with the equipment 100 to make it virtually impossible to remove from the electronic equipment 100.
  • the control signals are normally received by the fault detector 210, e.g. as a confirmation that the protection unit 102 is working in the predefined manner.
  • the communication unit 108 and the fault detector 110 may be further adapted to communicate the control signals using encrypted communication such that the control signals cannot be "faked" by any outside sender. Transmitting the control signals may further involve a challenge and response procedure such that the fault detector 210 frequently sends a so-called challenge to the communication unit 108, as indicated by a dashed arrow, which responds by sending control signals.
  • the communication unit 108 is thus configured to check, in some sense, the function of e.g. the theft detector 102a and/or the alarm unit 102b, as schematically indicated by dashed arrows therefrom, and send out control signals accordingly.
  • the communication unit 108 may also send out control signals indicating that the theft detector has detected an abnormal situation where it is likely that the equipment is being stolen.
  • the fault detector 110 is thus adapted to receive the control signals from the communication unit 108, and to indicate a fault when detecting that the protection unit 102 is not working in the predefined manner depending on the control signals.
  • the apparatus also involves an operation control unit 112 which is adapted to disable the electronic equipment 100 when a fault is indicated by the fault detector 110, as follows.
  • the fault detector 110 may detect that the protection unit 102 is not working in the predefined manner when no control signals are received from the communication unit 108, e.g. if the latter has been demolished or separated from the equipment 100.
  • the fault detector 110 may also detect that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner when the communication unit 108 transmits a fault notification or the like, depending on the implementation.
  • This fault notification may indicate any of the following: the protection unit 102 is not able to determine a position, the protection unit 102 is not able to issue any alarm or respond to any messages from the surveillance centre 104, and the protection unit 102 is not able to connect to the communication network 106.
  • the fault detector 110 is thus configured to indicate a fault when detecting that the protection unit 102 is not working in the predefined manner, depending on the control signals. This may be done by the fault detector 110 sending a fault indication to the operation control unit 112, as shown in another action 1:3.
  • the fault detector 110 may also be configured to indicate theft of the equipment, likewise depending on the control signals, which may be done by sending a theft indication to the operation control unit 112 in action 1:3.
  • the operation control unit 112 is adapted to disable the electronic equipment 100, as schematically shown in a further action 1:4. Disabling the electronic equipment 100 may be done in various different ways, depending on how the electronic equipment 100 is constructed and operates. To mention a few illustrative examples, if the electronic equipment 100 is an electronically controlled vehicle or outboard marine engine, it can be disabled by deactivating the electronics for ignition of the engine, or by locking the engine electronically, and so forth. In another example, a digital camera may be disabled by deactivating the electronics for taking pictures. It can be easily understood that any electronically controlled equipment can be disabled by manipulating the electronics therein in a way that cannot be tampered with by an outside person.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates another example of how this solution can be implemented in practice to support theft protection of an electronic equipment 200 which is slightly different from the example in Fig. 1 , still basically using the same solution.
  • the equipment 200 is protected from theft by means of a protection unit 202 which may comprise a theft detector 202a and an alarm unit 202b configured to send an alarm to a surveillance centre 204 over an external network 206.
  • the protection unit 202 may be designed and configured basically in the manner described for protection unit 102 of Fig. 1 , which will not be repeated here again.
  • Actions 2:1 a and 2:1 b correspond to actions 1:1 a and 1:1b in Fig. 1 .
  • the communication unit 208 is shown as being a wholly integrated part of the protection unit 202, e.g. by manufacture or production thereof.
  • the operation control unit 212 being adapted to disable the equipment 200, is shown as a part of the fault detector 210 while both fault detector 210 and operation control unit 212 are inseparably integrated with the electronic equipment 200 to make them virtually impossible to remove from the equipment 200.
  • the communication unit 208 is adapted to transmit control signals, shown in an action 2:2, indicating whether the protection unit 202 is working in a predefined manner, and the operation control unit 212 is adapted to disable the equipment 200 depending on the control signals, shown in another action 2:3, i.e. when the fault detector 210 indicates a fault of the protection unit 202 or theft of the equipment 200.
  • FIG. 3 A procedure for protecting an electronic equipment from being stolen when using an apparatus for supporting theft protection of the electronic equipment, will now be described with reference to the flow chart in Fig. 3 . It is assumed that a protection unit is also used at the electronic equipment, which protection unit is adapted to communicate with a surveillance centre when it is detected that the electronic equipment has been stolen. This procedure can be put into practice by using the apparatus of Fig. 1 or the apparatus of Fig. 2 .
  • control signals are transmitted, such as the control signals transmitted from the communication unit 108 or 208 above, indicating whether the protection unit is working in a predefined manner, i.e. as expected.
  • the control signals may be encrypted to prevent any outside sender to send faked control signals.
  • it is determined if the protection unit is working in the predefined manner or not, depending on the control signals transmitted in action 300, which determination may be done by the fault detector 110 or 210 above. If the protection unit is working in the predefined manner, the process may be repeated by returning to action 300 in order to keep monitoring the protection unit further.
  • a fault is indicated in another action 304 which may be done by the fault detector 110 or 210 above.
  • a delay or "hysteresis” may be introduced before indicating the fault to avoid any temporary deviation from the predefined manner not caused by theft.
  • the electronic equipment is disabled in response to the indicated fault, which may be done by the operation control unit 112 or 212 above.
  • the flow chart in Fig. 4 illustrates a more detailed variant of how the solution could be put into practice for supporting theft protection of an electronic equipment, again using a protection unit adapted to communicate with a surveillance centre when it is detected that the electronic equipment has been stolen.
  • the used protection unit comprises a theft detector with a positioning function, e.g. using GPS signals.
  • the protection unit also comprises an alarm unit configured to send an alarm to a surveillance centre over an external communication network. It is also assumed that an apparatus is used comprising a communication unit such as 108 or 208 above, a fault detector such as 110 or 210 above, and an operation control unit such as 112 or 212 above.
  • control signals are transmitted to the fault detector to indicate whether the protection unit is working in a predefined manner, i.e. as expected, which corresponds to action 300 above.
  • the control signals should be received as expected by the fault detector as long as the protection unit is working alright, as described above.
  • it is determined whether positioning is possible i.e. whether the protection unit is able to determine a position by receiving external GPS signals or similar from a satellite and determining the position based on the satellite signals. This determination may be done by the above communication unit 108 or 208. If it is determined in action 402 that positioning is not possible, a fault notification is provided in the control signals to the fault detector in an action 404, e.g. from the above communication unit 108 or 208 to the above fault detector 110 or 210.
  • the positioning function is found to be working in action 402, it is further determined whether the protection unit is able to connect to a communication network, in a next shown action 406. If no network connection is possible or existent in action 406, the process moves to action 404 and a fault notification is provided in the control signals to the fault detector. If a network connection is found to be possible or existent in action 406, it is further determined whether the transmitted control signals can be received at all by the fault detector, in a next shown action 408. If so, it can be concluded that the protection unit is working alright, i.e. in the predefined manner, from the outcome of actions 402, 406 and 408, and the process may be repeated by returning to action 400 in order to keep monitoring the protection unit further.
  • the fault detector indicates a fault in an action 410, corresponding to action 304 above and the operation control unit disables the electronic equipment in response to the indicated fault, in a final action 412.
  • the protection unit has effectively detected that the protection unit is not working in the predefined manner depending on the control signals either received as the above fault notification according to action 404 or not received at all according to action 408.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Child & Adolescent Psychology (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
EP12002335.3A 2012-03-30 2012-03-30 Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol Withdrawn EP2645347A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12002335.3A EP2645347A1 (fr) 2012-03-30 2012-03-30 Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol
US13/853,102 US20130263291A1 (en) 2012-03-30 2013-03-29 Apparatus and method for supporting theft protection

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP12002335.3A EP2645347A1 (fr) 2012-03-30 2012-03-30 Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2645347A1 true EP2645347A1 (fr) 2013-10-02

Family

ID=45976047

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12002335.3A Withdrawn EP2645347A1 (fr) 2012-03-30 2012-03-30 Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20130263291A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2645347A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103714656A (zh) * 2014-01-13 2014-04-09 靖江市旭飞安防工程有限公司 监室安全警戒装置

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8983449B1 (en) 2011-09-26 2015-03-17 Klone Mobile, LLC End user controlled temporary mobile phone service device swapping system and method
US10937289B2 (en) * 2014-09-18 2021-03-02 Indyme Solutions, Llc Merchandise activity sensor system and methods of using same
US11332099B2 (en) * 2019-08-07 2022-05-17 Keep Technologies, Inc. Vehicle monitoring and theft detection
US12221062B1 (en) * 2024-07-29 2025-02-11 Shongkawh LLC Motor vehicle theft protection and disablement system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998004967A1 (fr) * 1996-07-25 1998-02-05 Peter David Collins Systeme de protection d'immobilisation pour produits et elements electroniques
WO2000057375A1 (fr) * 1999-03-19 2000-09-28 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Systemes de securite
US6150923A (en) * 1996-10-10 2000-11-21 Johnson; William Nevil Heaton Alarm system
WO2004036520A1 (fr) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Balise de securite sans fil pour equipement client
US20080268866A1 (en) 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Webtech Wireless Inc. Configurable telematics and location-based system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1998004967A1 (fr) * 1996-07-25 1998-02-05 Peter David Collins Systeme de protection d'immobilisation pour produits et elements electroniques
US6150923A (en) * 1996-10-10 2000-11-21 Johnson; William Nevil Heaton Alarm system
WO2000057375A1 (fr) * 1999-03-19 2000-09-28 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Systemes de securite
WO2004036520A1 (fr) * 2002-10-15 2004-04-29 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Balise de securite sans fil pour equipement client
US20080268866A1 (en) 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Webtech Wireless Inc. Configurable telematics and location-based system

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103714656A (zh) * 2014-01-13 2014-04-09 靖江市旭飞安防工程有限公司 监室安全警戒装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130263291A1 (en) 2013-10-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20200172050A1 (en) Onboard device vehicle monitoring method and system
US20140266654A1 (en) Anti-tampering system for vehicular component
JP6241917B2 (ja) 車載装置及び通報制御方法
EP2645347A1 (fr) Appareil et procédé permettant de supporter la protection contre le vol
JP2005078639A (ja) 統合セキュリティシステムおよび方法
KR101130238B1 (ko) 차량 도난 방지 서비스 방법 및 시스템
KR101446525B1 (ko) 차량 해킹 방지 시스템, 방법, 및 상기 방법을 실행시키기 위한 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 프로그램을 기록한 매체
CN102337747A (zh) 一种具有防盗功能的井盖
CA2882465C (fr) Mecanisme de commande de vehicule comportant un accelerometre fonde sur un avertissement de securite et methodes associees
US11043089B2 (en) Security device for an electrically powered device
JP2013516853A (ja) Mtcデバイス、関連デバイス、およびシステム間での共同による監視のための方法
CN105196965A (zh) 一种电动车的报警方法、系统及电动车
KR101626611B1 (ko) 도난방지 동글 기반의 노트북 pc 도난방지 시스템 및 방법, 그리고 이를 위한 컴퓨터로 판독가능한 기록매체
GB2501679A (en) Fuel theft surveillance system
US12148274B2 (en) Tamper alert system
US9449479B2 (en) Security system
CN101445095B (zh) 联网汽车防盗报警方法及其报警系统
JP2020132073A (ja) 車両用防犯システム及び車両用防犯装置
US20170259784A1 (en) Vehicle antitheft system and vehicle security device
KR20160046985A (ko) 차량 도난 경고 방법
US20250170986A1 (en) Systems, devices, and methods for detection and prevention of vehicle theft or burglary
US8717161B1 (en) Lockout for hydrogen sulfide monitoring system
CN101519062B (zh) 联网机动车防盗报警方法及其报警系统
JP6401002B2 (ja) 作業機の監視システム
KR20120131475A (ko) 무선 모뎀을 이용한 차량 감시 장치 및 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140401

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20140612

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20141023