EP2689976B1 - Procédé de commande d'un élément de fermeture notamment pour véhicule automobile - Google Patents
Procédé de commande d'un élément de fermeture notamment pour véhicule automobile Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2689976B1 EP2689976B1 EP13173812.2A EP13173812A EP2689976B1 EP 2689976 B1 EP2689976 B1 EP 2689976B1 EP 13173812 A EP13173812 A EP 13173812A EP 2689976 B1 EP2689976 B1 EP 2689976B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sensor
- user
- longitudinal position
- operator control
- control event
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 17
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 33
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001236644 Lavinia Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001953 sensory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
- B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
- B62D25/00—Superstructure or monocoque structure sub-units; Parts or details thereof not otherwise provided for
- B62D25/08—Front or rear portions
- B62D25/10—Bonnets or lids, e.g. for trucks, tractors, busses, work vehicles
- B62D25/12—Parts or details thereof
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R25/00—Fittings or systems for preventing or indicating unauthorised use or theft of vehicles
- B60R25/20—Means to switch the anti-theft system on or off
- B60R25/2054—Means to switch the anti-theft system on or off by foot gestures
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K17/00—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
- H03K17/94—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the way in which the control signals are generated
- H03K17/945—Proximity switches
- H03K17/955—Proximity switches using a capacitive detector
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05F—DEVICES FOR MOVING WINGS INTO OPEN OR CLOSED POSITION; CHECKS FOR WINGS; WING FITTINGS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, CONCERNED WITH THE FUNCTIONING OF THE WING
- E05F15/00—Power-operated mechanisms for wings
- E05F15/70—Power-operated mechanisms for wings with automatic actuation
- E05F15/73—Power-operated mechanisms for wings with automatic actuation responsive to movement or presence of persons or objects
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
- E05Y2400/00—Electronic control; Electrical power; Power supply; Power or signal transmission; User interfaces
- E05Y2400/80—User interfaces
- E05Y2400/85—User input means
- E05Y2400/856—Actuation thereof
- E05Y2400/858—Actuation thereof by body parts, e.g. by feet
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
- E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
- E05Y2900/50—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for vehicles
- E05Y2900/53—Type of wing
- E05Y2900/546—Tailboards, tailgates or sideboards opening upwards
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K17/00—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
- H03K17/94—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the way in which the control signals are generated
- H03K17/96—Touch switches
- H03K2017/9602—Touch switches characterised by the type or shape of the sensing electrodes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K17/00—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking
- H03K17/94—Electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making and –breaking characterised by the way in which the control signals are generated
- H03K17/96—Touch switches
- H03K2017/9602—Touch switches characterised by the type or shape of the sensing electrodes
- H03K2017/9604—Touch switches characterised by the type or shape of the sensing electrodes characterised by the number of electrodes
- H03K2017/9613—Touch switches characterised by the type or shape of the sensing electrodes characterised by the number of electrodes using two electrodes per touch switch
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03K—PULSE TECHNIQUE
- H03K2217/00—Indexing scheme related to electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making or -breaking covered by H03K17/00
- H03K2217/94—Indexing scheme related to electronic switching or gating, i.e. not by contact-making or -breaking covered by H03K17/00 characterised by the way in which the control signal is generated
- H03K2217/96—Touch switches
- H03K2217/9607—Capacitive touch switches
- H03K2217/960755—Constructional details of capacitive touch and proximity switches
- H03K2217/96078—Sensor being a wire or a strip, e.g. used in automobile door handles or bumpers
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for controlling a closure element arrangement of a motor vehicle according to the preamble of claim 1.
- closure elements may be, for example, doors, such as side and rear doors, in particular sliding doors, flaps, in particular tailgates, trunk lids, engine hoods, load compartment floors or the like of a motor vehicle.
- closure element is to be understood in the present case.
- the triggering of the motor actuation of the closure element can be in the known method ( DE 10 2010 055 297 A1 . WO2012 / 052210 A1 ), from which the invention proceeds, accomplish particularly comfortable by a foot movement of the user.
- a control system with a controller and a sensor arrangement is provided which has two elongated, capacitive distance sensors. By means of the controller, the sensor readings of the two distance sensors are monitored to see if the user has performed a predetermined foot movement. When detecting such an operating event, a corresponding control of the drive arrangement is made, here the associated tailgate or the like. Motorized open or closed.
- the reliability of the operator event monitoring poses a challenge in the implementation of the known method.
- One reason for this is that the capacitive proximity sensors used here are only designed to detect the distance to the user transversely to the sensor extension. This can lead to a user passing along the sensor extension, which may also be associated with an approach of the user to the distance sensor, being erroneously detected as an operating event.
- the controller is indeed no information on whether there is a movement of the user along the sensor extension.
- the position of the user along the sensor extension is hereinafter referred to as "longitudinal position”. This means that the user is on any trajectory that is parallel to the sensor span. In each longitudinal position, the user can take any distance to the distance sensor. It may already be pointed out that the sensor extension is not necessarily a straight line. Rather, the sensor extension can be on any curve, so be curved.
- the implementation of the known method also poses a challenge because today's motor vehicles can be equipped with a variety of attachment components, in particular with trailer hitches, bicycle carriers or the like, which interfere with a sensory detection of operating events. For example, an operator event monitoring with the known method is hardly possible if the user is in a longitudinal position in which the trailer hitch has been mounted.
- the invention is based on the problem of designing and developing the known method such that the reliability of the operator event monitoring is increased by simple means.
- One consideration is to use the at least one distance sensor for determining the longitudinal position of the user provided for the operator event monitoring anyway.
- the information thus obtained about the longitudinal position of the user can be obtained, for example, information about whether the user passes only the distance sensor or whether the user performs an operating event.
- an operator event to be monitored which comprises a longitudinal movement of the user along the sensor extension.
- a characteristic chronological progression of the sensor measured values can take place result in the sensor strands, for example, in turn, may be part of an operating event to be monitored.
- longitudinal position does not necessarily refer to the absolute longitudinal position of the user. Rather, the term “longitudinal position” is to be understood in the present case. It includes all information that provides a value for the longitudinal position of the user. The same applies to the understanding of the term “distance”.
- At least two elongate, substantially adjacent sensor strands of the at least one distance sensor are provided, each of which is designed to detect a distance to a user.
- the sensor strands along the sensor extension to changing sensor configurations, in such a way that by means of the controller, the longitudinal position of the user as a function of the sensor measured values of the at least two sensor strands can be determined.
- this one-to-one mapping is not necessarily required in some applications.
- controller determines the longitudinal position of the user and that the operator event monitoring is modified as a function of the longitudinal position of the user.
- the operation event monitoring is performed differently depending on the longitudinal position of the user. For example, it can be achieved that the operator event monitoring is adapted to exactly this scenario in the event that the user is in the same longitudinal position as a mounted trailer hitch. If the user then moves to a longitudinal position where no attachment is located, the operator event monitoring can For example, be reset to a standard monitoring.
- the reliability of the operator event monitoring can also be increased, whereby any method can be used to determine the longitudinal position.
- the determination of the longitudinal position of the user can be attributed to an arithmetic operation, in particular a division or a difference, between the sensor measured values of two sensor strings (claim 3). It is also conceivable that the longitudinal position of the user is due to the differences in the phase shifts between voltage and current in the sensor measured values, in particular if the sensor strings are each capacitive sensor elements subjected to an alternating voltage (claim 4).
- control event monitoring can be implemented in a variety of ways.
- the operator event monitoring underlying operating event model is modified in dependence on the determined longitudinal position of the user.
- the configuration of the above-mentioned sensor strands is preferably such that the longitudinal position of the user as a function of the sensor measured values of the at least two sensor strands can be determined by means of the control.
- an unambiguous assignment depending on the application can be dispensed with.
- the sensor configuration of a sensor string is due to its geometry, its location, its material composition or the like.
- the sensor configuration includes every parameter that has an influence on the sensor readings of the sensor string.
- the change in the sensor configuration is achieved by changing the geometry of the measuring electrode, in particular by changing the effective area of the measuring electrode.
- This is a production technology easily implementable variant.
- the change in the sensor configuration to a corresponding change in the material composition of the measuring electrode, in particular by a corresponding coating of the measuring electrode accomplished. This can be a targeted change in the sensor configuration to achieve, even if the geometry must remain unchanged due to structural constraints.
- closure element arrangement 1 of a motor vehicle which has a closure element 2 designed as a tailgate.
- closure element 2 designed as a tailgate of a motor vehicle.
- closure element reference should be made to the introductory part of the description. in this respect apply all versions of a tailgate 2 accordingly for all other types of fasteners.
- the tailgate 2 is associated with a drive assembly 3, by means of the here and preferably a motorized adjustment of the tailgate 2 between the in Fig. 1 in a solid line shown in the closed position and in Fig. 1 shown in dashed line open position is effected.
- the drive assembly 3 is part of the tailgate 2 associated motor vehicle lock and that a corresponding control of the drive assembly 3, the opening of the motor vehicle lock and possibly a spring-driven adjustment of the tailgate 2 triggers.
- the term "drive arrangement" in the present case is interpreted broadly.
- the sensor arrangement 6 has at least one elongate distance sensor 7, 8, here and preferably two elongated distance sensors 7, 8 (FIG. Fig. 1a )), each with a sensor extension 9, 10 ( Fig. 1b )) on.
- the distance sensors 7, 8 are substantially adjacent to each other, but spaced from each other.
- the present meaning of the terms “sensor extension”, “distance A” and “longitudinal position L” are described below with reference to the illustration according to FIG Fig. 1b ) explained.
- the distances A 1 and A 2 it can be seen that the distances are detected transversely to the currently relevant to the user B section of the sensor extension 9 of the distance sensor 7.
- the longitudinal position L is the position of the user B along the respective sensor extension 9, 10. It should be noted that the User B can take a longitudinal position L at different distances from the respective distance sensor 7, 8.
- Certain user movements are defined here as operating events, which are each intended to trigger a specific reaction of the controller 5 and thus of the drive arrangement 3.
- the operator event is preferably a foot movement of the user to be explained.
- an operating event monitoring is provided, which is carried out by the controller 5.
- the sensor measured values of the distance sensors 7, 8 are monitored by means of the controller 5 to determine whether or not there is a predetermined operator event.
- a corresponding activation of the drive arrangement 3, for example the motorized opening of the tailgate 2 is undertaken.
- At least two, here and preferably exactly two, elongated, substantially adjacent sensor strands 7a, 7b of the at least one distance sensor 7 are provided.
- the term "substantially coextensive” is to be understood in the present case. In particular, this does not necessarily mean a parallel alignment of the two sensor strands 7a, 7b to each other.
- the two sensor strands 7a, 7b are each designed to detect a distance A to a user B. Strictly speaking, the sensor strands 7a, 7b taken in each case by a distance sensor in the above sense.
- the detection of operating event monitoring on underlying intervals can, for example, go back to the addition of the sensor measured values of the two sensor strings 7a, 7b.
- the sensor strands 7a, 7b along the sensor extension 9 have changing sensor configurations.
- This can be most easily the representation according to Fig. 3 in which the effective area of the sensor strands 7a, 7b changes along the sensor extension 9.
- a Detailed explanation of the variation of the sensor configurations will be given below.
- the longitudinal position L of the user B is determined by means of the controller 5 as a function of the sensor measured values of the at least two sensor strands 7a, 7b, here the exactly two sensor strands 7a, 7b.
- this determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B is largely independent of the respective current distance of the user B to the distance sensor 7.
- the longitudinal position L of the user B can be used in very different ways. According to the proposal, it is provided that the operator event monitoring is modified as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B. In this way, the operator event monitoring can be optimally adapted to the conditions prevailing at the respective longitudinal position L.
- the determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B can take place in different ways.
- the determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B is based on a division of the sensor measured values of two sensor strands 7a, 7b.
- the determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B is based on the difference of the sensor measured values of the two sensor strands 7a, 7b.
- the above division or the above difference has the effect that the distance A of the user B to the distance sensor 7 has only a negligible influence on the determined longitudinal position L.
- the determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B is based on the difference between the phase shifts between voltage and current in the sensor measured values of two sensor strings 7a, 7b.
- This can be attributed, for example, to the fact that the Ohmic resistance between a lateral connection here and one of the longitudinal position of the user B associated longitudinal portion of the sensor strands 7a, 7b depends on the distance between the terminal and the longitudinal portion.
- the phase shift can be specifically influenced by a suitable choice of material for the sensor strands 7a, 7b.
- the sensor strands 7a, 7b are provided along their sensor extension 9 with different coatings, which can likewise effect a deliberate change in the phase shift during operation of the sensor string 7a, 7b as a capacitive sensor.
- an operating event model of signal characteristic values is assigned to an operating event, wherein monitoring is carried out within the scope of the operating event monitoring by means of the controller 5 as to whether the sensor measured values correspond to the signal characteristics of the operating event model.
- Such an operator event model effectively represents the shape or history of the sensor readings during an operator event.
- the operating event model is generated as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B or selected as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B from a number of stored operating event models or parameterized as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B.
- an operating event is assigned to a control event characteristic value set from signal characteristic values, which in turn are compared with the sensor measured values as part of the operator event monitoring.
- the Operator Event Parameter Set is a simple form of operator event model. According to the proposal, a modification of the control event characteristic set as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B is proposed accordingly.
- the modification of the operator event monitoring can relate to the signal processing method on which the determination of the sensor measured values by means of the controller 5 is based.
- the signal processing method is defined by a signal processing parameter set with signal processing parameters such as minimum signal level, temporal measurement resolution or amplitude measurement resolution.
- the signal processing parameter set is selected as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B from a number of stored signal processing parameter sets or parameterized as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B.
- the modification of the operator event monitoring relates to the evaluation of the digitized sensor measured values.
- the operator event monitoring initially comprises the digitization of the sensor measured values, wherein the subsequent evaluation of the digitized measured data, in particular the comparison with an operator event parameter set, is carried out based on a corresponding evaluation method.
- the evaluation method is defined by an evaluation parameter set with evaluation parameters, such as the calculation accuracy or the type of adjustment algorithm. It is also proposed here that the evaluation parameter set is selected as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B from a number of stored evaluation parameter sets or parameterized as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B.
- the proposed modification of the control event monitoring can in principle also relate to the activation of the sensor arrangement 6.
- activation is to be understood here broadly and refers to all control measures that lead to the determination of the sensor measured values.
- the sensor arrangement 6 is controlled by the controller 5 as a function of the longitudinal position L of the user B as part of the control event monitoring.
- plausibility check comprises predetermined conditions, their occurrence for or against the presence of a control event speak. It would be conceivable here that different plausibility conditions are used depending on the longitudinal position L of the user B.
- At least one operator event is defined as user B foot movement.
- at least one distance sensor 7, 8 is arranged in or on a rear trim part 11, here and preferably on the rear bumper 11, of the motor vehicle.
- the at least one distance sensor 7, 8 preferably extends over a substantial part of the width of the motor vehicle, as shown in FIG Fig. 2a ) can be seen.
- At least one operator event is defined as a back and forth movement of the user's foot.
- the stations show the sequence of such an operator event involving a back and forth motion of the user's foot.
- Such a foot movement generates in the sensor measured values of the distance sensors 7, 8 preferably a pulse-like time course, which is evaluated in the context of the operator event monitoring.
- the sensor strands 7, 8 along the sensor extension 9, 10 changing sensor configurations in such a way that by means of the controller 5, the longitudinal position L of the user B as a function of the sensor measured values of the at least two sensor strands 7a, 7b can be determined. It thus depends on a very specific, along the sensor extension 9 changing sensor configuration, which allows determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B.
- the current longitudinal position L of the user B can be determined as a function exclusively from the current sensor measured values of the at least two sensor strands 7a, 7b. Accordingly, the determination of the longitudinal position L of the user B requires only the measurement of a single pair of measured values.
- the change in the sensor configuration along the sensor extension 9 is made such that the longitudinal position L of the user B can be determined continuously as a function of the sensor measured values from the sensor strands 7a, 7b along the sensor extension.
- the longitudinal position L of the user B can be determined continuously as a function of the sensor measured values from the sensor strands 7a, 7b along the sensor extension.
- the change in the sensor configuration along the sensor extension 9 is made such that the longitudinal position L of the user B can be assigned to at least two different longitudinal sections along the sensor extension 9 as a function of the sensor measured values of at least two sensor strands 7a, 7b ,
- the change in the sensor configuration along the sensor extension 9 is also required only in sections.
- an attachment component preferably a trailer coupling 12
- This can be reacted control technology to the position of the user B in the longitudinal position of the trailer coupling 12 as mentioned above.
- the distance sensors 7, 8 and the corresponding sensor strands 7a, 7b are capacitive sensors which have at least one elongated measuring electrode, in this case even consisting merely of such a measuring electrode.
- the measuring electrodes in turn consist of at least one, in the Fig. 3 and 4 from exactly one electrical conductor.
- a first sensor string 7a has a first measuring electrode and a second sensor string 7b corresponding to a second measuring electrode.
- the distance sensors 7, 8 and the sensor strands 7a, 7b are configured as measuring electrodes as mentioned above and are connected to the controller 5 at the end. This is in the Fig. 3 to 5 indicated in dashed line.
- the connection of the measuring electrodes can also be provided on both sides.
- the sensor configuration includes all parameters that may have any effect on the sensor readings. Accordingly, the sensor configuration of a sensor string 7a, 7b goes back, for example, to its geometry, its position, its material composition or the like.
- the change in the sensor configuration can be achieved particularly easily by changing the geometry of the measuring electrode along the sensor extension 9.
- the effective area of the measuring electrode here and preferably continuously, changes along the sensor extension 9. This can best be done according to the illustration Fig. 3 remove.
- the term "effective area" includes only the areas that have a capacitive effect within the capacitive distance sensor. Surfaces which do not contribute to the capacitive distance detection are not included here.
- the effective area of the sensor string 7a continuously reduces from one end to the other end of the sensor string 7a.
- the effective area of the other sensor string 7b also changes continuously, but in opposite directions to the change in the effective area of the aforementioned sensor string 7a.
- Another preferred variant for changing the sensor configuration along the sensor extension 9 is based on a corresponding change in the material composition of the respective measuring electrode along the sensor extension 9.
- This can be utilized as capacitive sensors in the operation of the sensor strands 7a, 7b in order to be able to draw a conclusion on the longitudinal position L of the user B from the differences in the phase shift between voltage and current.
- Fig. 4 shows that the sensor configuration changes only in region II, so that with the proposed method between the in Fig. 4 left part of area I and the in Fig. 4 right part of area I can not be distinguished.
- this distinction is not necessary in the present case since it is only important to determine whether the user B is in the longitudinal position L of the trailer coupling 12, that is to say in the region II.
- the change in the sensor configuration has also been achieved here via a change in the effective area of the sensor strands 7a, 7b.
- the sensor strands 7a, 7b each extend over the entire sensor extension 9.
- the sensor strands 7a, 7b cover only a part of the entire sensor extension 9.
- Fig. 5 shows that the sensor strands 7a, 7b have a plurality of strand sections 13, which are here and preferably electrically connected in series.
- the individual strand sections 13 are simply connected by an electrical conductor. It is conceivable, for example, that the individual strand sections 13 have different effective surfaces. Here and preferably, however, it is the case that the individual strand sections 13 are coated differently with a resistance material in the above manner.
- the two sensor strands 7a, 7b are assigned to a single distance sensor 7, in the drawing, the respective upper distance sensor 7. Accordingly, it is always the case that one of the two distance sensors 7, 8 has the two sensor strands 7a, 7b. Alternatively, however, it may also be provided that the one distance sensor 7 has one sensor string 7a and the other distance sensor 8 has the other sensor string 7b. Depending on the application, other sensor structures may be provided.
- the sensor configuration of the respective sensor string 7a, 7b changing along the sensor extension 9 leads to a change in the sensitivity of the respective sensor string 7a, 7b that varies along the sensor extension 9.
- sensitivity is to be understood here in an expanding sense such that a change in the Sensitivity at identical distance A to the user B always brings a corresponding change in the sensor reading with it.
- sensitivity curve further means that the sensitivity in the above sense alters at any point at a position along the sensor extension 9. In principle, therefore, the sensitivity can be constant, or even zero, at least in places. In the latter case, the distance sensor 7, 8 or the respective sensor string 7a, 7b does not react to the approach of a user B.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
- Measurement Of Length, Angles, Or The Like Using Electric Or Magnetic Means (AREA)
Claims (5)
- Procédé de commandé d'un arrangement d'éléments de fermeture (1), notamment d'un véhicule automobile, l'arrangement d'éléments de fermeture (1) possédant un élément de fermeture (2), un arrangement d'entraînement (3) associé à l'élément de fermeture (2) et un système de commande (4) comprenait une commande (5) et un arrangement de capteurs (6), l'arrangement de capteurs (6) possédant au moins un capteur de distance (7, 8) allongé ayant une prolongation de capteur (9, 10), une distance A par rapport à un utilisateur B, lequel se trouve à une position longitudinal L le long de la prolongation de capteur (9, 10), pouvant être détectée au moyen du capteur de distance (7, 8) transversalement à la prolongation de capteur (9, 10), les valeurs mesurées du courant de l'au moins un capteur de distance (7, 8) étant surveillées dans le cadre d'une surveillance d'événement d'opération en vue de déterminer la présence d'un événement d'opération prédéfini, et une commande de l'arrangement d'entraînement (3) étant réalisée en fonction du résultat de la surveillance d'événement d'opération,
caractérisé en ce que
la position longitudinal L de l'utilisateur B est déterminée au moyen de la commande (5) et en ce que la surveillance d'événement d'opération est modifiée en fonction de la position longitudinal L de l'utilisateur B et en ce qu'un modèle d'événement d'opération constitué de valeurs caractéristiques de signal est associé à un événement d'opération, en ce qu'une surveillance est effectuée au moyen de la commande (5) dans le cadre de la surveillance d'événement d'opération afin de déterminer si les valeurs mesurées de capteur correspondent aux valeurs caractéristiques de signal du modèle d'événement d'opération et en ce que le modèle d'événement d'opération est généré en fonction de la position longitudinal L de l'utilisateur B ou sélectionné en fonction de la position longitudinal L de l'utilisateur B à partir d'une pluralité de modèles d'événement d'opération mis en mémoire ou paramétré en jonction de la position longitudinal L de l'utilisateur B. - Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il existe au moins deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b) de l'au moins un capteur de distance (7), qui s'étendent sensiblement l'une à côté de l'autre, lesquelles sont respectivement conçues pour la détection d'une distance A par rapport à un utilisateur B, en ce que les branches de capteur (7a, 7b) possèdent des configurations de capteur qui varient le long de la prolongation de capteur (9) et en ce que la position longitudinale L de l'utilisateur B est déterminée au moyen de la commande (5) en tant que fonction des valeurs mesurées de capteur des au moins deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b).
- Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que la détermination de la position longitudinale L de l'utilisateur B émane du résultat d'une opération arithmétique entre les valeurs mesurées de capteur de deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b), en ce que la détermination de la position longitudinale L de l'utilisateur B émane du résultat d'une division des valeurs mesurées de capteur de deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b), ou en ce que la détermination de la position longitudinale L de l'utilisateur B émane du résultat de la différence des valeurs mesurées de capteur de deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b).
- Procécé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la détermination de la position longitudinale L de l'utilisateur B émane du résultat de la différence des déphasages entre la tension et le courant dans les valeurs mesurées de capteur de deux branches de capteur (7a, 7b).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un événement d'opération est défini en tant que mouvement du pied de l'utilisateur, de préférence en ce que l'au moins un capteur de distance (7, 8) est disposé dans ou sur une partie d'habillage arrière (11), notamment le pare-chocs arrière, d'un véhicule automobile et s'étend de préférence sur une partie significative de la largeur du véhicule automobile, de préférence en ce qu'au moins un événement d'opération est défini en tant que mouvement d'aller et de retour du pied de l'utilisateur, de préférence en ce que pendant l'événement d'opération, l'au moins un capteur de distance (7, 8) génère un tracé dans le temps de type impulsionnel des valeurs mesurées de capteur.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18161950.3A EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procede de commande d'un ouvrant en particulier pour un vehicule a moteur |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE201210014676 DE102012014676A1 (de) | 2012-07-25 | 2012-07-25 | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung insbesondere eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
Related Child Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18161950.3A Division EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procede de commande d'un ouvrant en particulier pour un vehicule a moteur |
| EP18161950.3A Division-Into EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procede de commande d'un ouvrant en particulier pour un vehicule a moteur |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2689976A1 EP2689976A1 (fr) | 2014-01-29 |
| EP2689976B1 true EP2689976B1 (fr) | 2018-05-23 |
Family
ID=48699594
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP13173812.2A Not-in-force EP2689976B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procédé de commande d'un élément de fermeture notamment pour véhicule automobile |
| EP18161950.3A Active EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procede de commande d'un ouvrant en particulier pour un vehicule a moteur |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP18161950.3A Active EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2012-07-25 | 2013-06-26 | Procede de commande d'un ouvrant en particulier pour un vehicule a moteur |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US9283994B2 (fr) |
| EP (2) | EP2689976B1 (fr) |
| KR (1) | KR101619570B1 (fr) |
| CN (1) | CN103569049B (fr) |
| DE (1) | DE102012014676A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102011112274A1 (de) | 2011-09-05 | 2013-03-07 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Hallstadt | Steuersystem |
| DE102011121775B3 (de) | 2011-12-21 | 2013-01-31 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Hallstadt | Steuersystem |
| DE102012013065A1 (de) | 2012-07-02 | 2014-01-02 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Hallstadt | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE202013012936U1 (de) | 2013-11-07 | 2022-08-22 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Se & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Steuerungsanordnung zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102013018594B4 (de) | 2013-11-07 | 2022-04-21 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Se & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementenanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102013018838A1 (de) * | 2013-11-08 | 2015-05-13 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Hallstadt | Fahrzeug mit einer Stellvorrichtung für eine Fahrzeugtür, Stellvorrichtung und Verwendung einer Stellvorrichtung |
| DE102013114883A1 (de) | 2013-12-25 | 2015-06-25 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Hallstadt | Steuersystem für eine motorische Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102013114881A1 (de) | 2013-12-25 | 2015-06-25 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Hallstadt | Steuersystem für eine motorische Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102014011037A1 (de) | 2014-07-23 | 2016-01-28 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Hallstadt | Sensorelektrode für einen kapazitiven Näherungssensor |
| DE102014117896A1 (de) * | 2014-12-04 | 2016-06-23 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Hallstadt | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Schiebetüranordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102014018924B4 (de) | 2014-12-22 | 2017-03-16 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Vorrichtung zur berührungslosen Betätigung eines verstellbaren Fahrzeugteils |
| DE102015112589A1 (de) | 2015-07-31 | 2017-02-02 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Steuersystem für eine motorisch verstellbare Laderaumvorrichtung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102015119701A1 (de) | 2015-11-15 | 2017-05-18 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Verfahren für den Betrieb einer kapazitiven Sensoranordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| DE102016108702A1 (de) * | 2016-05-11 | 2017-11-16 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Bamberg | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer motorischen Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs |
| JP6737122B2 (ja) * | 2016-10-19 | 2020-08-05 | アイシン精機株式会社 | 車両ドア操作検出装置 |
| DE102017110054A1 (de) | 2017-05-10 | 2018-11-15 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Steuersystem |
| DE102017208791A1 (de) | 2017-05-24 | 2018-11-29 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Bamberg | Kapazitiver Näherungssensor |
| DE102018127683A1 (de) * | 2018-11-06 | 2020-05-07 | Huf Hülsbeck & Fürst Gmbh & Co. Kg | Sensoranordnung |
| US11161555B2 (en) | 2019-09-06 | 2021-11-02 | Banks Morrison Innovations Llc | Tailgate deactivation system |
| CN111497737A (zh) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-07 | 一汽奔腾轿车有限公司 | 一种汽车车门控制装置和方法 |
Family Cites Families (22)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE9421122U1 (de) * | 1994-11-10 | 1995-04-27 | Horst Siedle Kg, 78120 Furtwangen | Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung einer jeweiligen örtlichen Position eines Körpers |
| AU2741297A (en) * | 1996-04-23 | 1997-11-12 | Advanced Safety Concepts, Inc. | Vehicle occupant sensing |
| US6275146B1 (en) | 1996-04-23 | 2001-08-14 | Philip W. Kithil | Vehicle occupant sensing |
| US5844486A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 1998-12-01 | Advanced Safety Concepts, Inc. | Integral capacitive sensor array |
| US6535200B2 (en) * | 1999-01-25 | 2003-03-18 | Harald Philipp | Capacitive position sensor |
| US6774642B2 (en) * | 2002-08-27 | 2004-08-10 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Capacitive angular position sensor |
| US20050114276A1 (en) | 2003-11-20 | 2005-05-26 | Hunter Valerie K. | Personal customization of stamps |
| DE102004008928A1 (de) * | 2004-02-24 | 2005-09-08 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Ag | Verfahren zum Ankuppeln eines Anhängers unter Einsatz einer Fahrzeugniveauregulierung |
| FR2868526B1 (fr) * | 2004-04-06 | 2007-04-20 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | Capteur de position d'un actionneur de soupape d'un moteur a combustion interne |
| JP4610300B2 (ja) * | 2004-11-02 | 2011-01-12 | 富士通テン株式会社 | 車両用制御装置および車両用制御方法 |
| DE102004055982A1 (de) * | 2004-11-19 | 2006-06-01 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Schließsystem für ein Fahrzeug |
| DE102005032402B3 (de) | 2005-07-12 | 2006-09-28 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Verfahren zum Nachweis einer Berechtigung zum Ver- oder Entriegeln eines Objekts sowie Sicherheitsvorrichtung |
| US8179435B2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2012-05-15 | Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. | Vehicle surroundings image providing system and method |
| FR2917771B1 (fr) * | 2007-06-25 | 2009-09-04 | Valeo Securite Habitacle Sas | Procede securise de fermeture automatique d'un hayon de vehicule automobile |
| US7880481B2 (en) | 2007-12-19 | 2011-02-01 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Capacitive sensor and measurement system |
| DE102009017404A1 (de) * | 2008-04-29 | 2009-11-05 | Volkswagen Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Betätigung einer Tür oder Klappe eines Fahrzeugs |
| DE102008063366B4 (de) * | 2008-12-30 | 2022-04-28 | Huf Hülsbeck & Fürst Gmbh & Co. Kg | Einrichtung zum berührungslosen Betätigen einer Heckklappe eines Kraftfahrzeugs sowie Verfahren zum Betätigen einer Heckklappe eines Kraftfahrzeuges und Kraftfahrzeug |
| FR2943190B1 (fr) * | 2009-03-13 | 2016-12-30 | Valeo Securite Habitacle | Dispositif de declenchement d'une action sur un ouvrant de vehicule automobile |
| CN103153717B (zh) | 2010-10-22 | 2016-08-31 | 胡夫·许尔斯贝克和福斯特有限及两合公司 | 用于通断汽车开门系统的电容式传感器装置 |
| DE102010055297A1 (de) | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kommanditgesellschaft, Hallstadt | Verfahren zur Erzeugung einer Bedienmeldung beim Auftreten eines Bedienereignisses |
| US8977507B2 (en) * | 2011-01-21 | 2015-03-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Event detection system user interface system coupled to multiple sensors including an impact detection system |
| DE102011112274A1 (de) | 2011-09-05 | 2013-03-07 | Brose Fahrzeugteile Gmbh & Co. Kg, Hallstadt | Steuersystem |
-
2012
- 2012-07-25 DE DE201210014676 patent/DE102012014676A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2013
- 2013-06-26 EP EP13173812.2A patent/EP2689976B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
- 2013-06-26 EP EP18161950.3A patent/EP3401168B1/fr active Active
- 2013-07-24 KR KR1020130087175A patent/KR101619570B1/ko not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-07-25 CN CN201310314923.XA patent/CN103569049B/zh not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-07-25 US US13/951,163 patent/US9283994B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| None * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US9283994B2 (en) | 2016-03-15 |
| EP3401168A1 (fr) | 2018-11-14 |
| EP2689976A1 (fr) | 2014-01-29 |
| KR20140029170A (ko) | 2014-03-10 |
| CN103569049A (zh) | 2014-02-12 |
| US20140032055A1 (en) | 2014-01-30 |
| EP3401168B1 (fr) | 2021-08-11 |
| CN103569049B (zh) | 2017-06-27 |
| DE102012014676A1 (de) | 2014-01-30 |
| KR101619570B1 (ko) | 2016-05-10 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP2689976B1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un élément de fermeture notamment pour véhicule automobile | |
| EP2753485B1 (fr) | Système de commande | |
| EP2844528B1 (fr) | Procédé d'actionnement d'un ensemble élément de fermeture d'un véhicule automobile | |
| DE102013114883A1 (de) | Steuersystem für eine motorische Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
| EP2633502B2 (fr) | Unité de capteur pour l'actionnement sans contact d'une porte de véhicule | |
| EP3211363B1 (fr) | Système de commande d'un élément de fermeture motorisé d'un véhicule à moteur et procédé de fonctionnement correspondant | |
| DE102013114881A1 (de) | Steuersystem für eine motorische Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
| DE102013001066B4 (de) | Kapazitiver Näherungssensor | |
| EP3191665A1 (fr) | Système de poignée de porte d'un véhicule automobile | |
| EP3227162B1 (fr) | Système de capteurs pour volant, volant avec un tel système et procécé pour opérer un tel système | |
| DE102014101661A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
| WO2016087435A1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un agencement de porte coulissante d'un véhicule à moteur | |
| DE102014013213A1 (de) | Kollisionsschutzvorrichtung für eine Fahrzeugtür und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer solchen Kollisionsschutzvorrichtung | |
| DE102013018592A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
| WO2013182464A1 (fr) | Ensemble capteur capacitif pour actionner une ouverture de porte au niveau d'un véhicule automobile | |
| EP2943630B1 (fr) | Ensemble capteur de proximité capacitif sur une porte d'un véhicule automobile pour détecter un mouvement d'approche approximativement horizontal d'une main d'opérateur | |
| DE102017213540A1 (de) | Kapazitiver Näherungssensor und Verfahren zum Betrieb eines solchen | |
| EP2974023B1 (fr) | Ensemble de détection capacitive équipé d'une électrode de protection | |
| WO2018206655A2 (fr) | Systeme de commande | |
| DE102012014677A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ansteuerung einer Verschlusselementanordnung insbesondere eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
| WO2025021766A1 (fr) | Élément de commutation de sécurité à capteur duo | |
| WO2021197734A1 (fr) | Système de hayon d'un véhicule à moteur et procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de hayon | |
| WO2025093764A1 (fr) | Dispositif de détection d'un sens de rotation d'un moteur électrique et procédé de montage pour monter un système d'entraînement | |
| DE102012105363A1 (de) | Sensoranordnung zur Betätigungserfassung an einem Kraftfahrzeug |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140729 |
|
| RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20150618 |
|
| RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE GMBH & CO. KOMMANDITGESELLSCHA |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H03K 17/955 20060101ALI20171129BHEP Ipc: E05F 15/00 20150101ALI20171129BHEP Ipc: B60R 25/20 20130101AFI20171129BHEP |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20171214 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1001265 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180615 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502013010187 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180823 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180823 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180824 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502013010187 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180626 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190226 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1001265 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502013010187 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE SE & CO. KOMMANDITGESELLSC, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: BROSE FAHRZEUGTEILE GMBH & CO. KOMMANDITGESELLSCHAFT, BAMBERG, 96052 BAMBERG, DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130626 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180523 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180523 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180923 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20200512 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20200618 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210630 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20210626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210626 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210630 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502013010187 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230103 |