EP2841654B1 - Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer - Google Patents

Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2841654B1
EP2841654B1 EP13728938.5A EP13728938A EP2841654B1 EP 2841654 B1 EP2841654 B1 EP 2841654B1 EP 13728938 A EP13728938 A EP 13728938A EP 2841654 B1 EP2841654 B1 EP 2841654B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight elements
weight
plates
offshore
plate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP13728938.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2841654A1 (fr
Inventor
Anton Kanand
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP2841654A1 publication Critical patent/EP2841654A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2841654B1 publication Critical patent/EP2841654B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B17/0017Means for protecting offshore constructions
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B3/00Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
    • E02B3/04Structures or apparatus for, or methods of, protecting banks, coasts, or harbours
    • E02B3/12Revetment of banks, dams, watercourses, or the like, e.g. the sea-floor
    • E02B3/122Flexible prefabricated covering elements, e.g. mats, strips
    • E02B3/126Flexible prefabricated covering elements, e.g. mats, strips mainly consisting of bituminous material or synthetic resins

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a device for the Kolkschutz of offshore structures.
  • Verkulkung is understood to mean erosion phenomena of a water-covered ground due to currents in the area of the offshore structures.
  • a disadvantage of known protective measures is that they are complex but nevertheless inadequate in terms of their protective effect.
  • Offshore e.g. in monopiles of wind turbines, it is state of the art, as Kolkschutz about 300 to 1000 t réelle Anlagenen stones.
  • these stones produce harmful currents that prevent sedimentation of sand and thus accelerate the Verkolkung even.
  • a third, often used possibility is therefore to use no Kolkschutz at all, to accept a Verkulkung and hope that the forming Verkupkung a certain depth does not exceed. For this depth, however, the foundation of a monopile, for example, must be placed deeper into the seabed, which causes higher construction costs. In addition, submarine cables of the offshore structure laid by the Verkulkung can be scavenged and / or its connections damaged or destroyed by flow.
  • the present invention has been developed in light of the above-described prior art.
  • the object of the invention is therefore to propose a device for the scour protection of offshore structures, which offers a durable, cost effective and thereby an effective protection.
  • the device comprises one or more interconnected elastic plates made of rubber and weight elements, which are fixed to the plates by means of suitable fastening means.
  • fastening is meant a permanent and secure fixation of the weight elements on the plate (s), even when the elastic plate (s) are pulled down or pressed by the weight elements so as to form a favorable hydrodynamic shape.
  • Suitable fasteners are for example screws with nuts.
  • the plate or the plates are curved downwards in the edge region of the device, wherein the back or the underside of the plates serves as a support surface for the substrate and the front or the top of the plates as Baking surface and protection against erosive sand and water vortex serves.
  • the sheets of rubber can be laid under the water or sea surface directly on the sand or soil surface in the area of offshore structures or even completely or partially under the soil surface. They have the advantage that they adapt to the course of the soil surface and can absorb the energy of the waves and vortices by their elastic properties. Furthermore, they are resistant to salt water and there is no corrosion. Due to the resistance and durability of the rubber, the device is thus maintenance-free.
  • the rubber can be made of natural rubber environmentally friendly. Another advantage is that the device is safe in a collision with watercraft.
  • the elastic plate or the rubber elastic plates are fixed with the safe and permanently attached weight elements at the points to be protected.
  • the elastic plate or the rubber elastic plates have a thickness of one to two centimeters.
  • the weight elements are preferably fastened to the edge region of the device on the upper side of the elastic plates. Due to the force exerted by the weight elements on the plates and the force due to their elasticity, restoring force, the surface formed by the plates is curved and it forms a particularly favorable hydrodynamic shape, which serves as a ramp surface for water or pressure waves. The force of the pressure waves is absorbed, absorbed and derived from the offshore structures. Should the ground sag or undercut beneath the weight member, then the weight member moves down together with the panel, restoring the protective effect. A submarine cable laid under the rubber elastic plates is optimally protected and increases the operational safety of the system.
  • the proposed device for Kolkschutz has the further advantage in the offshore sector, that they with a single Crane stroke can be dismantled and leaves an obstacle-free seabed.
  • the device forms the elastic plate or form the interconnected elastic plates a disc with a circular or approximately circular contour, in the center of the offshore structure is arranged.
  • the weight elements are then fastened in particular along the edge region of the disk.
  • the elastic plate or the interconnected elastic plates are then curved in the edge region at the strongest downward, the curvature decreases toward the centrally located offshore structure towards and merges into a flat surface.
  • the radius of the device is about three times as long as the radius of the offshore structure in the plane in which the device is arranged or attached to the offshore structure.
  • the weight elements have an approximately rectangular base surface, whose longitudinal axis points in the direction of the offshore structure.
  • weight elements are made of metal, a large mass of high weight is achieved in a small volume.
  • the weight elements in longitudinal section and / or in cross section in the shape of an isosceles, symmetrical trapezoid, which tapers towards the top, the corners are preferably rounded.
  • the weight elements may have on the underside an indentation which is concave in cross-section inwardly curved.
  • the weight elements are not just the weighting of a plate or multiple plates. Depending on their size and arrangement, they have to fulfill different requirements and tasks.
  • the weight elements are attached to the plate or plates and have the task to keep the device selectively on the ground. Depending on the distance and Water depth and expected wave height, as well as flow velocity of the water are among other things to determine the mass of the weight elements. They have different pore pressures due to swell, to balance, ie between the weight elements, the plate should raise and lower. The sand, however, remains underneath and is held. For this to be possible, a watertight attachment must be made to the offshore structure to be protected and marginal weight elements must be provided outside the edge.
  • the Randroissetti must have a certain aerodynamic shape and be aligned in a certain way and with a certain distance from each other.
  • the correct weight size and the lowest possible flow resistance should be selected.
  • metal weight elements with small area and large weight.
  • the distance of the weight elements to each other is important. These weight elements are to be selected in weight, shape and surface depending on the conditions of use so that they work into the seabed at the edges under flow and wave effect of itself and thus seals the plate at the edge. There must be no fold or opening. At the same time, however, this edge has to adapt to any unevenness of the seabed.
  • the special education of a favorable hydrodynamic form is important. Therefore, the distance of the weight elements, u.a. Shape, size and arrangement, important.
  • the plate must sink in such a way that it represents a shallow transition between plate and sea bottom after assuming the rest state at the seabed, otherwise there develops a new Kolk. Folds in the plate, and even if they are very small, can lead to the scouring of the scour protection and damage to the offshore structure to be protected.
  • the weight of the weight elements may be between 50 and 500 kg / m after tests have been carried out. Again, the conditions of use are crucial.
  • the stiffeners can be externally or in the plate integrated stiffeners. These can have a distance of about 2 to 3 m on the outside of the edge of the panel, if they are external stiffeners. All stiffeners are arranged away from an imaginary center of the foundation to be protected from star-shaped outward, the outer contour, with known sinking of the seabed should have as round or approximately a round shape as possible in order to avoid wrinkling at the edge of the plate.
  • the outer diameter of the device is about three times the diameter of the pile.
  • the scour plate must be attached to the body to be protected in a watertight manner. If this does not happen and there is a gap of only one centimeter, an enormous scab is formed through this gap and damages the stability of the foundation to be protected.
  • the weight elements on the edge consist essentially of metal.
  • the weight elements have the task of complaining the edge of the plate so that the plate sinks at the ends in the seabed, without causing a Kolk there.
  • the metal weights With the metal weights, the highest possible weight can be achieved in relation to the flow cross-section. This also means that with the necessary weight size the smallest possible flow resistance is available. Among other things, this is the reason why the weight elements from the edge in the direction of the center of the foundation considered so arranged.
  • the longitudinal axis of the weight elements always points in the direction of the foundation.
  • the special shape of the weight elements along with their dimensions, but has other reasons.
  • the plate or the interconnected plates have the task to adapt at least at the edges, each contour of the soil. That's why the weight should not be too wide.
  • the device with screwed-on weight elements must still be so flexible that it adapts to all uneven floors, both positive and negative ground changes or bumps.
  • the weight elements Depending on the conditions of sea depth, flow velocity, wave load and soil conditions, the weight elements have a mass of 50 to 500 kg / m.
  • the weight elements can be shaped. However, if the plate is smaller in diameter, a drape is inevitable. So that this does no damage, the drapery is given in downward direction. This is achieved by the particular shape of the weight elements with a lower indentation.
  • the plate is first stretched. When sinking, the plate relaxes. If you continue to sink, you will throw many small wrinkles through the given shape, but they are directed downwards and push into the sand. This effect is sufficient to obtain a tilt as desired with a constructively correctly designed plate. If the distance between the weight elements is too large, the fold is thrown up by sand pressure. The Kolkschutz is then leaking at the edge. If a sinking of the seabed is not expected, the weight elements can be used without indentation, and stiffeners are also not necessary. These stiffeners can also be used to fold up the scour seal for transport at sea and thus gain logistical advantages.
  • a stiffener comprises a stiffening profile made of flexible plastic, a stiffening wall made of rubber arranged above the stiffening profile, which preferably has a fabric insert and forms a closed cavity which is filled with a medium such as water or air.
  • FIG. 1a shows a plan view of the device 1 with a Monopile 2.
  • This consists of interconnected, elastic plates 3 made of rubber, which are one to two inches thick.
  • the plates 3 may be bonded together by vulcanization or by suitable positive locking fasteners (not shown).
  • the interconnected elastic plates 3 are in the form of a disc having a circular contour and a circular, central opening 11.
  • In the central opening 11 is the offshore structure to be protected 2, namely a monopile of a wind turbine, arranged.
  • the radius of the device 1 is about three times as long as the radius of the offshore structure 2, with respect to the horizontal plane in which the device 1 is attached to the monopile 2, namely at the level of the seabed. 8
  • the disc formed from the rubber plates 3 is attached watertight to the monopile 2, so that no seawater can penetrate under the device 1 through the central opening 11.
  • the elastic plate 3 or the elastic plates 3 made of rubber lie on the seabed 8, wherein the elasticity unevenness of the seabed 8 can be compensated.
  • weight elements 4 are mounted on the plates 3, which press the plates 3 at the edges down into the seabed and thus seal. As a result, an effective scouring protection is achieved.
  • the weight elements 4 are shown for reasons of clarity only on two opposite circle segments, but in fact 13 weight elements 4 are provided along the entire disc edge.
  • the weight elements 4 have a substantially rectangular base area.
  • the weight elements 4 are aligned on the plates 3 so that the (imaginary) longitudinal axis 12 of each weight element 4 extends in the direction of the offshore structure 2 and thus meet all longitudinal axes 12 in the center of the device 1 and the monopile 2.
  • FIG. 1b shows a section FIG. 1 a in a detail view.
  • the weight elements 4 are arranged at the edge of a circle segment of the plates 3, wherein the circumference 5 of the circular segment is about one meter.
  • the weight elements 4 each have a width of about seventeen centimeters and a distance 6 of about three centimeters.
  • the total mass of the weight elements 4 per meter circumference 5 is about fifty to five hundred kilograms, per weight element 4 thus ten to a hundred kilograms.
  • FIG. 2 shows partial views a, b, c of another embodiment of the device 1 in vertical section. This has stiffening elements 7 on the underside. It is shown that the rubber sheets 3 should be tightly fastened to the foundation body of the offshore structure 2.
  • the FIG. 2b shows a sunken by about two meters seabed.
  • FIG 2d a device 1 without stiffening elements 7 is shown. This results in a curved shape 14 of the plates, which is basically hydrodynamically favorable. However, in the case shown, the curvature 14 is too pronounced, so that Kolk promoting turbulence arise.
  • Cheaper is a lower curvature 14 ', as in Figure 2c shown in dashed lines. This can be adjusted by selecting the mass of the weight elements 4.
  • FIG. 3a shows a weight element 4 in longitudinal section, FIG. 3b in cross-section and Figure 3c in the plan view.
  • the weight element 4 has the basic shape of an upwardly tapered cuboid, which has the shape of an isosceles, symmetrical trapezium in longitudinal section and in cross section.
  • the weight elements 4 shown have, based on their base area, a length of 3.80 m and a width of 1.70 m.
  • the cuboid tapers quantitatively such that there is a deviation from the vertical of about 15 degrees.
  • the corners are also rounded. On the one hand, this results in a favorable hydrodynamic shape, because no vortex and unfavorable currents of the seawater are produced at the weight elements 4.
  • Another essential advantage of the upwardly tapering shape is that portions of the plates 3 can lower elastically downwards without the weight elements 4 then coming into contact in the region of a curvature.
  • the weight elements 4 also have two through openings 15 for the insertion of fastening elements (not shown). As a result, the weights can be permanently attached to the rubber plates 3. Even with a decrease in the rubber plates 3 and the formation of a slope or curvature, as in FIGS. 2c and 2d shown, a secure fixation is guaranteed.
  • two lower recesses 17 are provided for a weight element 4 in each case. These serve as an assembly aid and facilitate gripping the weight element 4, when this is to be transported and then attached to the elastic plates 3.
  • FIG. 4a shows another embodiment of the weight element 4 in longitudinal section, FIG. 4b in cross-section and Figure 4c in the plan view.
  • the weight element 4 has on its underside a concavely inwardly or upwardly curved indentation 9.
  • FIG. 5a shows a vertical section through the device 1 with weight elements 4 with a lower indentation 9.
  • the weight elements 4 thus correspond to those in the Figures 4a, 4b and 4c shown embodiment.
  • the weight elements 4 shown in cross-section are fixed on the upper side of the elastic plates 3 and permanently fixed.
  • indentations 9 a wrinkling 10 between the weight elements 4. Although the folds 10 in the elastic plates 3 between the weight elements 4 down, so are bent in the region of the interstices 16 in the direction of the seabed 8, thereby Wells 10 is formed. This is done by the fact that the Indentations 9 form a concave guide for the rubber sheets 3, whereby the rubber sheets 3 are wave-shaped, as in FIG. 5a shown. As a result, a harmful wrinkling is avoided upwards in the area of the interstices 16 and the device 1 also seals in the edge areas and protects offshore structures 2 from being overcast.
  • FIG. 5b shows weight elements 4 without indentation. If a greater sinking of the seabed and thus wrinkling downwards are not to be expected, this embodiment of the weight elements 4 can be used.
  • FIG. 6 shows a perspective, horizontally cutaway detail of another embodiment of the device 1 with a flexible stiffener 18.
  • This includes a stiffening profile 19 made of flexible plastic.
  • the stiffening profile 19 is fastened by means of suitable fastening means on the elastic plates 3.
  • a stiffening wall 20 is arranged made of rubber, which may have a fabric insert and is tightly mounted on the plates 3. The attachment can be done by adhesive or vulcanization.
  • the upper stiffening wall 20 together with the elastic plates 3 forms a closed cavity 21 which is filled with a medium.
  • a medium for example, water or air in question.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Revetment (AREA)

Claims (9)

  1. Dispositif (1) de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages de mer (2), qui comprend une ou plusieurs plaques élastiques (3) en caoutchouc reliées entre elles et des éléments de poids (4), qui sont fixés au niveau de la zone de bord du dispositif (1) sur la plaque élastique (3) ou les plastiques élastiques (3) à l'aide de moyens de fixation, caractérisé en ce que les éléments de poids (4) se rétrécissent vers le haut et présentent en coupe longitudinale et/ou en coupe transversale la forme d'un trapèze symétrique isocèle.
  2. Dispositif (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la plaque élastique (3) ou les plaques élastiques (3) en caoutchouc présentent une épaisseur de un à deux centimètres.
  3. Dispositif (1) selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que la plaque élastique (3) ou les plastiques élastiques (3) reliées entre elles forment un disque avec un contour circulaire ou approximativement circulaire, au milieu duquel l'ouvrage de mer (2) est agencé.
  4. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le rayon du dispositif (1) est à peu près trois fois aussi long que le rayon de l'ouvrage de mer (2) dans le plan, dans lequel le dispositif (1) est agencé.
  5. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les éléments de poids (4) présentent une surface de base sensiblement rectangulaire, dont les axes longitudinaux sont dirigés respectivement en direction de l'ouvrage de mer (2).
  6. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les éléments de poids (4) sont constitués sensiblement de métal.
  7. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les coins des éléments de poids (4) sont arrondis.
  8. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les éléments de poids (4) présentent au niveau de la face inférieure un renfoncement (9), qui est incurvé de façon concave en coupe transversale.
  9. Dispositif (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un renforcement souple (17) est prévu, qui comprend un profil de renforcement (19) et une paroi de renforcement (20) agencée au-dessus du profil de renforcement (19), dans lequel la paroi de renforcement (20) forme une cavité fermée (21), qui est remplie d'un agent.
EP13728938.5A 2012-04-22 2013-04-22 Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer Not-in-force EP2841654B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012103537 2012-04-22
PCT/DE2013/100147 WO2013159770A1 (fr) 2012-04-22 2013-04-22 Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2841654A1 EP2841654A1 (fr) 2015-03-04
EP2841654B1 true EP2841654B1 (fr) 2016-12-28

Family

ID=48626225

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13728938.5A Not-in-force EP2841654B1 (fr) 2012-04-22 2013-04-22 Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20150078834A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2841654B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN104411890A (fr)
WO (1) WO2013159770A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015102065A1 (de) 2015-02-12 2016-08-18 Anton Kanand Übergangsvorrichtung für Kolkschutzvorrichtungen von Offshore-Bauwerken

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1428595A (en) * 1921-12-12 1922-09-12 Massey Concrete Products Corp Cribbing
US3214921A (en) * 1961-12-07 1965-11-02 Shell Oil Co Pipe laying apparatus
NL6708016A (fr) * 1967-06-09 1968-12-10
US3529427A (en) * 1968-11-05 1970-09-22 Delta Diving Ltd Device for preventing or reducing scours at the lower ends of members supporting marine structures
JPS6053124B2 (ja) * 1982-07-02 1985-11-22 日建工学株式会社 水中構造物の基底部安定用シ−ト
US20070009327A1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2007-01-11 Sanguinetti Peter S Sediment control device and system
DE102008020261A1 (de) * 2008-04-22 2009-10-29 Kanand, Anton, Dipl.-Ing. Vorrichtung für den Hochwasser- und Küstenschutz

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20150078834A1 (en) 2015-03-19
EP2841654A1 (fr) 2015-03-04
CN104411890A (zh) 2015-03-11
WO2013159770A1 (fr) 2013-10-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2386691A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour une protection contre l'affouillement de constructions offshore
DE102009014920A1 (de) Fundamentkörper, insbesondere für eine Offshore-Windenergieanlage
DE3321670A1 (de) Verfahren zum schuetzen ortsfester konstruktionen in wasser gegen eisfelder und schutzeinrichtung
EP2591176B1 (fr) Installation en mer, en particulier éolienne
DE10056857B4 (de) Verankerungsstabilisierte Trägerboje
DE69333376T2 (de) Vorrichtung zur Wellenenergiezerstreuung
DE112021001211T5 (de) Kolkschutzsystem für eine Pfahlgründung eines Offshore-Windparks und zugehöriges Verfahren
EP2847387A1 (fr) Dispositif anti-affouillement pour ouvrages en mer
DE102009033708A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Reduzierung von Eislasten an einer Pfahlgründung für eine Offshore-Windenergieanlage
EP2841654B1 (fr) Dispositif de protection contre l'érosion d'ouvrages en mer
DE1909799A1 (de) Wellenbrecher
DE69308837T2 (de) Ankergerät für eine schwimmkonstruktion, und schwimmkonstruktion
WO2013178202A1 (fr) Installation photovoltaïque flottant sur l'eau équipée d'un dispositif de lestage
DE102013018503A1 (de) Offshore-Bauwerk
DE202005003425U1 (de) Gründung, insbesondere für eine Offshore-Windenergieanlage
DE2344599C2 (de) Vorrichtung zum Schutz des Fundaments eines teilweise im Wasser eingetauchten Bauwerks gegen Wellen
DE2713756A1 (de) Auf den meeresboden abzusetzender behaelter zur lagerung von fluessigkeiten
DE202013101650U1 (de) Wasserschutz- und/oder -haltevorrichtung
DE102015102065A1 (de) Übergangsvorrichtung für Kolkschutzvorrichtungen von Offshore-Bauwerken
DE102014202049B3 (de) Vorrichtung zur Bedeckung eines Untergrundes eines fluiden Mediums
DE2162559A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Erzeugung und Befestigung von Ablagerungen von Sedimentmaterial am Boden von Gewässern
AT516339A2 (de) Wehranlage, insbesondere Kiesschleuse
EP3722541B1 (fr) Bâtiment résistant aux vagues
DE202009008175U1 (de) Flexible Verankerung schwimmender Teichbelüfter
DE2222427A1 (de) Klappenventil

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20141117

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160404

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 857412

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013005908

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170329

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170328

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170428

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170425

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170424

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20170425

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170328

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170428

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502013005908

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170422

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502013005908

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 857412

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130422

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180422

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161228