EP3069201B1 - Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique - Google Patents

Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3069201B1
EP3069201B1 EP14796121.3A EP14796121A EP3069201B1 EP 3069201 B1 EP3069201 B1 EP 3069201B1 EP 14796121 A EP14796121 A EP 14796121A EP 3069201 B1 EP3069201 B1 EP 3069201B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
reactor
specific technical
reactors
chemical reaction
specific
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14796121.3A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3069201A1 (fr
Inventor
Nicolai KRASBERG
Lukas Hohmann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Bayer AG
Original Assignee
Bayer AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bayer AG filed Critical Bayer AG
Priority to EP14796121.3A priority Critical patent/EP3069201B1/fr
Priority to PL14796121T priority patent/PL3069201T3/pl
Publication of EP3069201A1 publication Critical patent/EP3069201A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3069201B1 publication Critical patent/EP3069201B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
    • G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J19/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J19/0006—Controlling or regulating processes
    • B01J19/0033—Optimalisation processes, i.e. processes with adaptive control systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J2219/00049—Controlling or regulating processes
    • B01J2219/00191—Control algorithm
    • B01J2219/00211—Control algorithm comparing a sensed parameter with a pre-set value

Definitions

  • the work leading to this invention has been funded under the Grant Agreement No 228867 under the Seventh Framework Program of the European Union FP7 / 2007-2013.
  • the present invention relates to a method for operating a system set up to carry out at least one chemical reaction.
  • the invention relates to a computer program with program code means stored on a computer-readable data carrier, a data carrier and a computer system.
  • To carry out a chemical reaction to produce a particular chemical product it is necessary to provide a production plant with a customized plant structure.
  • technically suitable process reactors are to be selected for this purpose and combined with one another to form a production plant.
  • DE102006060494 describes a method for estimating the robustness of a proposed solution. It is an object of the invention to enable rapid and optimal planning of a system set up to carry out at least one chemical reaction, taking into account the widest possible variety of boundary conditions.
  • Claim 1 proposes a method for operating a system set up to carry out at least one chemical reaction, wherein technically and economically optimally suitable process reactors are provided for forming the production system, and wherein this providing comprises an at least partially automated selection of process reactors from a multiplicity of process reactors which are technically and economically optimally suited for the construction of the production plant, taking account of reactor-specific technical parameters assigned to the process reactors of the plurality of process reactors and of predetermined process-specific technical criteria, by testing, in at least one selection step, for each process reactor of the plurality of process reactors, whether at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor and / or at least one process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable derived from at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter fulfill at least one process-specific technical criterion lt.
  • the provision of the process reactors which are technically and economically optimally suited for the construction of the production plant comprises, in addition to the physical provision, in particular the provision of reactor-specific technical parameters for a large number of process reactors in a reactor database.
  • reactor-specific technical parameters for a large number of process reactors in a reactor database.
  • individual process reactors can be selected in the course of the at least partially automated selection, which are technically and economically optimally suited for the design of a specific production plant.
  • this selection also takes into account specified process-specific technical criteria.
  • the process-specific technical criteria can be of various kinds. For example, process-specific technical criteria can be given in the form of boundary conditions to be complied with of process steps to be carried out.
  • At least one selection step checks for each process reactor of the plurality of process reactors whether at least one process-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor and / or at least one process-specific and at least one process-specific technical parameter derived from at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to at least one process reactor reactor-specific technical target size meets at least one process-specific technical criterion.
  • the process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable can be, for example, a residence time of a process reactor derived from a model equation, whereby the reactor volume and, as process-specific technical parameters, a planned volume flow and maximum permissible residence times can be taken into account as a reactor-specific technical parameter.
  • the target variable can be determined, for example, directly by a reactor-specific technical parameter, eg. As a reactor temperature or the like, be given.
  • the at least partially automated selection may also include two or more selection steps.
  • a partially automated selection a plurality of suitable process reactors may be selected and this selection provided, for example, as a graphical representation, to a scheduling staff so that the scheduling personnel may perform a final selection step.
  • the selection can be done fully automatically by finally selecting a particular process reactor or combination of process reactors without the intervention of planning personnel.
  • the at least partially automated selection comprises at least two successive selection steps, wherein the selection steps differ from one another at least in the respective process-specific technical criteria and the thus compared reactor-specific technical parameters or process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variables.
  • the selection steps differ from one another at least in the respective process-specific technical criteria and the thus compared reactor-specific technical parameters or process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variables.
  • process reactors having allowable dwell times from the plurality of process reactors may be selected, after which at least one process reactor whose operating pressure is permissible is selected from these selected process reactors.
  • the number of possible selection steps may increase as the number of different parameters available increases.
  • the at least partially automated selection of the process reactors from the multiplicity of process reactors that are technically and economically optimally suited for the construction of the production plant takes place taking into account technical information stored in a database with regard to possible serial and / or parallel interconnections of process reactors.
  • a parallel interconnection of process reactors or of reactor channels formed by process reactors a production capacity of a reactor channel can be increased.
  • a process volume and a residence time can be increased. This is taken into account according to this embodiment of the method.
  • a further advantageous embodiment provides that the process-specific technical criterion is defined by a process-specific parameter limit whose overshoot or undershoot leads to fulfillment of the process-technical criterion, or by a process-specific parameter range whose compliance leads to fulfillment of the process-technical criterion.
  • Claim 6 proposes a computer program having program code means stored on a computer-readable data carrier which cause a computer or a corresponding computing unit to carry out a method according to one of the aforementioned embodiments or any combination thereof when executed on the computer or the corresponding arithmetic unit , With this computer program, the advantages mentioned above with respect to the method are connected accordingly.
  • a disk is proposed with an aforementioned computer program. With this disk, the advantages mentioned above with respect to the method or the computer program are connected accordingly Further, a computer system is proposed in claim 8, on which an aforementioned computer program is loaded. With this computer system, the advantages mentioned above with respect to the method or the computer program are connected accordingly.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of an exemplary sequence of a method according to the invention, this embodiment an at least partially automated selection of suitable technically and economically optimal for the formation of a desired production plant process reactors in the form of residence time channel reactors from a variety of process reactors taking into account in a database, the Process reactors of the plurality of process reactors associated reactor-specific technical parameters and of predetermined process-specific technical criteria includes.
  • the at least partially automated selection comprises seven successive selection steps, wherein the selection steps differ from one another at least in the respective process-specific technical criteria and the thus compared reactor-specific technical parameters or process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variables.
  • the maintenance of the database is used, which is used for selecting process reactors. During this maintenance, at least reactor-specific technical parameters are manually or automatically entered into the database.
  • a first selection step is carried out in which for each process reactor of the plurality of process reactors it is checked whether at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor has a process-specific technical criterion in the form of a parameter range for the possible mass throughput through the process reactor, namely whether to carry out a desired chemical reaction required planned mass flow through a process reactor is possible met.
  • Can a planned Mass flow rate can not be achieved by a process reactor, it can be checked whether a slight adjustment of the planned mass flow rate is possible to achieve a mass flow rate in the reactor-specific parameter range for the possible mass flow rate through the process reactor.
  • process step 20 there is a selection of process reactors having allowable mass flow rates.
  • a further selection step is carried out, in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 20 is checked for each process reactor, if a reactor-specific technical parameter in the form of the respective reactor volume and process-specific technical parameters in the form of a parameter range is assigned by means of a model equation from a reactor reactor assigned to this process reactor For process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable derived in the form of a residence time of the respective process reactor, a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether the residence time lies in the parameter range for permissible residence times, is fulfilled for permissible residence times and a planned volume flow.
  • the result of method step 30 is a further selection of process reactors which have a permissible residence time.
  • a further selection step takes place, in which for each process reactor the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 30 is checked whether a reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor in the form of a possible operating pressure in the process reactor is a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether the operating pressure and / or a pressure loss of the process reactor derived therefrom is permissible for carrying out a specific chemical reaction.
  • a reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor in the form of a possible operating pressure in the process reactor is a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether the operating pressure and / or a pressure loss of the process reactor derived therefrom is permissible for carrying out a specific chemical reaction.
  • a further selection step takes place in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 40 is checked for each process reactor as to whether a reactor-specific technical parameter associated with a process reactor in the form of geometric properties of the process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter takes the form of a planned process-specific and reactor-specific technical target a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether flow conditions in the process reactor are suitable for carrying out the desired chemical reaction, met.
  • a comparability of process reactors with different geometric properties is achieved.
  • process step 50 This results in a further selection of process reactors which have suitable flow conditions.
  • a further selection step takes place, in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 50 is checked for each process reactor, whether a process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable derived from at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to at least one process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter possible heat transfer performance of the process reactor, a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether a heat transfer capacity of a process reactor for performing a particular chemical reaction is permitted, met.
  • a process-specific technical criterion namely whether a heat transfer capacity of a process reactor for performing a particular chemical reaction is permitted
  • a further selection step takes place, in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 60 is checked for each process reactor, whether a process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable derived from at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to at least one process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter Kinetics of reaction and mixing in the process reactor during performance of a particular chemical reaction, a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether appropriate kinetics of reaction and mixing in the reactor during the implementation of a particular chemical reaction present.
  • a sufficiently intensive initial mixing of reactants by means of the process reactor can be achieved during the execution of a specific chemical reaction.
  • process step 70 there is a further selection of process reactors having suitable kinetics of reaction and mixing in the reactor during a particular chemical reaction.
  • a further selection step takes place in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 70 is checked for each process reactor.
  • a first selection step is carried out in which for each process reactor of the plurality of process reactors it is checked whether a reactor-specific technical process assigned to at least one process reactor Parameters and at least one process-specific technical parameter derived process-specific and reactor-specific technical target size a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether a thermally safe operation of the process reactor is ensured during a particular chemical reaction performance fulfilled. In this case, it can also be checked whether a temperature at a hotspot of the respective process reactor is permissible for carrying out a specific chemical reaction. As a result of the Process step 80 results in a further selection of process reactors with which a thermally safe operation of the process reactor is ensured during the execution of a specific chemical reaction.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of an exemplary sequence of a method according to the invention, this embodiment an at least partially automated selection of suitable technically and economically optimal for the formation of a desired production plant process reactors in the form of mixing units from a variety of process reactors taking into account in a database, the process reactors of Variety of process reactors associated reactor-specific technical parameters and of predetermined process-specific technical criteria includes.
  • the at least partially automated selection comprises two successive selection steps, wherein the selection steps differ from one another at least in the respective process-specific technical criteria and the thus compared reactor-specific technical parameters or process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variables.
  • the database is maintained, which is used to select process reactors. During this maintenance, at least reactor-specific technical parameters are manually or automatically entered into the database.
  • a selection step takes place in which, for each process reactor, the plurality of process reactors is checked as to whether a reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor in the form of a possible operating pressure in the process reactor is a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether the operating pressure and / or a pressure derived pressure drop of the process reactor is allowed to carry out a particular chemical reaction is met.
  • a process-specific technical criterion namely whether the operating pressure and / or a pressure derived pressure drop of the process reactor is allowed to carry out a particular chemical reaction is met.
  • an independent process reactor is selected, to which no residence time section is connected downstream.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic representation of an exemplary sequence of a method according to the invention, this embodiment being an at least partially automated selection of process reactors which are technically and economically optimally suited for the formation of a desired production plant in the form of continuous stirred tank reactors from a plurality of process reactors, taking into account the process reactors stored in a database the reactor-specific technical parameters associated with the plurality of process reactors and of predetermined process-specific technical criteria.
  • the at least partially automated selection comprises four successive selection steps, wherein the selection steps differ from one another at least in the respective process-specific technical criteria and the thus compared reactor-specific technical parameters or process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variables.
  • the database is maintained, which is used for selecting process reactors. During this maintenance, at least reactor-specific technical parameters are manually or automatically entered into the database.
  • a selection step takes place in which, for each process reactor, the plurality of process reactors is checked as to whether a reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to this process reactor in the form of a possible operating pressure in the process reactor is a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether the operating pressure and / or a pressure derived pressure drop of the process reactor is allowed to carry out a particular chemical reaction is met.
  • the result of method step 220 results in a further selection of process reactors which have a permissible operating pressure or a permissible pressure loss.
  • a further selection step is carried out, in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 220 is checked for each process reactor, whether a reactor-specific technical parameter in the form of the respective reactor volume and process-specific technical parameters in the form of a parameter range assigned to this process reactor by means of a model equation
  • a process-specific technical criterion namely whether the residence time lies in the parameter range for permissible residence times, is fulfilled for permissible residence times and a planned volume flow.
  • the residence time of a process reactor is not in the parameter range for permissible residence times, it can be checked whether a slight adjustment of the planned mass flow rate is possible in order to reach the parameter range for permissible residence times. As a result of method step 230, a further selection of process reactors having a permissible residence time results.
  • a further selection step is carried out, in which the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 230 is checked for each process reactor, whether a process-specific and reactor-specific technical target variable derived from at least one reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to at least one process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter possible heat transfer performance of the process reactor, a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether a heat transfer performance of a process reactor for carrying out a particular chemical Reaction is allowed.
  • a process-specific technical criterion namely whether a heat transfer performance of a process reactor for carrying out a particular chemical Reaction is allowed.
  • a further selection step takes place, in which for each process reactor the selection of process reactors obtained in method step 240 is checked as to whether a reactor-specific technical parameter assigned to a process reactor in the form of geometric properties of the process reactor and at least one process-specific technical parameter takes the form of a planned process-specific and reactor-specific technical target a process-specific technical criterion, namely whether flow conditions in the process reactor are suitable for carrying out the desired chemical reaction, met.
  • a comparability of process reactors with different geometric properties is achieved.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Claims (8)

  1. Procédé d'exploitation d'une unité conçue pour la réalisation d'au moins une réaction chimique, le procédé consistant à mettre en place des réacteurs de traitement techniquement et économiquement les mieux appropriés possible pour la création de l'unité de production, cette mise en place comprenant une sélection au moins partiellement automatisée des réacteurs de traitement techniquement et économiquement les mieux appropriés possible pour la création de l'unité de production parmi une pluralité de réacteurs de traitement, en prenant en considération des paramètres techniques spécifiques aux réacteurs associés aux réacteurs de traitement de la pluralité de réacteurs de traitement et mémorisés dans une banque de données, et des critères techniques prédéterminés spécifiques au traitement, selon lequel, dans au moins une étape de sélection, on vérifie pour chaque réacteur de traitement de la pluralité de réacteurs de traitement si au moins un paramètre technique spécifique au réacteur et associé à ce réacteur de traitement et/ou au moins une grandeur technique cible spécifique au traitement et spécifique au réacteur, dérivée d'au moins un paramètre technique spécifique au réacteur associé à ce réacteur de traitement et d'au moins un paramètre technique spécifique au traitement, satisfait au moins un critère technique spécifique au traitement.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la sélection au moins partiellement automatisée comprend au moins deux étapes de sélection successives, les étapes de sélection différant les unes des autres au moins au niveau des critères techniques spécifiques au traitement respectifs et des paramètres techniques spécifiques au réacteur ou des grandeurs techniques cibles spécifiques au traitement et spécifiques au réacteur comparés avec ceux-ci.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que la sélection au moins partiellement automatisée des réacteurs de traitement techniquement et économiquement les mieux appropriés possible pour la création de l'unité de production parmi la pluralité de réacteurs de traitement a lieu en prenant en considération des informations techniques enregistrées dans une banque de données, relatives à des connexions en série et/ou parallèle possibles de réacteurs de traitement.
  4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que le critère technique spécifique au traitement est défini par une valeur limite de paramètre spécifique au traitement, dont le dépassement ou le non-dépassement conduit à une satisfaction du critère relatif au traitement, ou par une plage de paramètre spécifique au traitement, dont le respect conduit à une satisfaction du critère relatif au traitement.
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que le critère technique spécifique au traitement considère si
    - un débit massique nécessaire à la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée est possible dans un réacteur de traitement,
    - un temps de séjour d'un réacteur de traitement permet la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée,
    - une pression d'exploitation et/ou une perte de pression d'un réacteur de traitement permet la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée,
    - une puissance de transfert de chaleur d'un réacteur de traitement permet la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée,
    - des cinétiques de réaction et un mélange appropriés sont présents dans un réacteur pendant une réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée,
    - une exploitation thermiquement sûre d'un réacteur de traitement est assurée pendant une réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée,
    - une température au niveau d'un point chaud d'un réacteur de traitement permet la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée, ou
    - un mélange initial suffisamment intensif des réactifs est possible au moyen d'un réacteur de traitement pendant la réalisation d'une réaction chimique déterminée.
  6. Programme informatique comprenant des moyens de codage du programme stockés dans un support de données lisible par ordinateur, qui ordonne à un ordinateur ou une unité arithmétique appropriée de réaliser un procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 5 lorsqu'il est exécuté sur l'ordinateur ou l'unité arithmétique appropriée.
  7. Support de données comprenant un programme informatique selon la revendication 6.
  8. Système informatique, sur lequel un programme informatique selon la revendication 6 est chargé.
EP14796121.3A 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique Active EP3069201B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP14796121.3A EP3069201B1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique
PL14796121T PL3069201T3 (pl) 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Sposób obsługiwania urządzenia przystosowanego do przeprowadzania co najmniej jednej reakcji chemicznej

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20130193132 EP2874029A1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2013-11-15 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique
PCT/EP2014/074268 WO2015071259A1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner une installation conçue pour l'exécution d'au moins une réaction chimique
EP14796121.3A EP3069201B1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3069201A1 EP3069201A1 (fr) 2016-09-21
EP3069201B1 true EP3069201B1 (fr) 2017-12-20

Family

ID=49582665

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20130193132 Withdrawn EP2874029A1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2013-11-15 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique
EP14796121.3A Active EP3069201B1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2014-11-11 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20130193132 Withdrawn EP2874029A1 (fr) 2013-11-15 2013-11-15 Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US10261479B2 (fr)
EP (2) EP2874029A1 (fr)
JP (2) JP6779783B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR101944165B1 (fr)
CN (2) CN105849654A (fr)
BR (1) BR112016010785B1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2930477C (fr)
DK (1) DK3069201T3 (fr)
ES (1) ES2661829T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL3069201T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2015071259A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102014116239A1 (de) * 2014-11-07 2016-05-12 Uts Biogastechnik Gmbh Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Rühreinrichtung und eines Fermenters
US10698424B2 (en) * 2014-11-20 2020-06-30 Covestro Deutschland Ag Method for continuously producing a product by way of at least two coupled-together chemical reactions
CA2968475C (fr) * 2014-11-24 2023-07-04 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Procede pour la configuration d'une installation de production concue pour la realisation d'au moins une reaction chimique
CN113853519B (zh) * 2019-05-22 2024-11-15 生物梅里埃公司 用于制造生产分析反应器的方法和系统
CN115274004B (zh) * 2022-07-26 2023-06-09 江南大学 一种基于知识复用的发酵过程菌体浓度预测方法及系统
WO2025203793A1 (fr) * 2024-03-27 2025-10-02 旭化成株式会社 Appareil de gestion, système de gestion, procédé de gestion, et programme de gestion

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4477092A (en) * 1983-02-24 1984-10-16 Gray Tool Company Fire resistant connections and dovetail-like sealing means therefor
US5441716A (en) * 1989-03-08 1995-08-15 Rocky Research Method and apparatus for achieving high reaction rates
JPH0778809B2 (ja) * 1992-03-18 1995-08-23 株式会社日立製作所 設計支援方法およびその装置
DE4338219C1 (de) * 1993-11-09 1995-03-30 Marantec Antrieb Steuerung Antriebseinrichtung für einen hin- und hergehend anzutreibenden Gegenstand, insbeondere Torblatt
US5518700A (en) * 1994-06-25 1996-05-21 Shell Oil Company Cyclonic reactor
BE1009406A3 (fr) * 1995-06-09 1997-03-04 Solvay Methode de regulation de procedes de synthese de produits chimiques.
US7435392B2 (en) * 2000-02-03 2008-10-14 Acclavis, Llc Scalable continuous production system
US7056477B1 (en) * 2000-02-03 2006-06-06 Cellular Process Chemistry, Inc. Modular chemical production system incorporating a microreactor
JP2002251414A (ja) * 2001-02-21 2002-09-06 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 脱硝装置増設計画支援方法、脱硝装置増設計画支援装置、プログラム、記録媒体
US7118917B2 (en) * 2001-03-07 2006-10-10 Symyx Technologies, Inc. Parallel flow reactor having improved thermal control
JP2003015728A (ja) * 2001-04-03 2003-01-17 Nippon Steel Corp 原料の最適混合演算方法、装置、コンピュータプログラム、及びコンピュータ読み取り可能な記憶媒体
US7337099B2 (en) 2002-12-23 2008-02-26 Global Nuclear Fuel - Americas, Llc Method, arrangement and computer program for generating database of fuel bundle designs for nuclear reactors
DE10323090B4 (de) * 2003-05-16 2005-07-21 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. Modulares chemisches Mikroreaktionssystem sowie Verfahren hierfür
FR2859033B1 (fr) * 2003-08-20 2006-03-03 Total France Procede et dispositif pour le pilotage en continu d'un processus de cristallisation dans un milieu reactionnel
DE10359970A1 (de) * 2003-12-18 2006-01-12 Abb Research Ltd. System und Verfahren zur optimierenden Evaluation und Planung von Prozessabläufen
US7534378B2 (en) * 2004-03-03 2009-05-19 Rexam Prescription Products Inc. Plastic forming process monitoring and control
JP2006185120A (ja) * 2004-12-27 2006-07-13 Daicel Chem Ind Ltd プラント制御監視装置
JP2006195735A (ja) * 2005-01-13 2006-07-27 Chiyoda Corp プラント設計支援システム及び方法
FR2880967A1 (fr) * 2005-01-14 2006-07-21 Alfa Laval Vicarb Sa Optimisation d'une reaction chimique dans un reacteur ouvert du type a plaques
US7343225B2 (en) * 2005-06-03 2008-03-11 Univation Technologies, Llc Method for reducing off-grade product production during reaction transitions
JP5005194B2 (ja) * 2005-07-05 2012-08-22 新日本製鐵株式会社 輸送車の運行計画作成方法
US7461038B2 (en) 2005-12-21 2008-12-02 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for evaluating robustness of proposed solution to constraint problem and considering robustness in developing a constraint problem solution
ES2405556T3 (es) * 2006-09-07 2013-05-31 Univation Technologies, Llc Métodos para determinación en línea del grado de pegajosidad de una resina utilizando un modelo para depresión de la temperatura de iniciación de la fusión
DE102007045123A1 (de) * 2007-09-20 2009-04-02 Bayer Technology Services Gmbh Reaktor und Verfahren zu dessen Herstellung
US8160730B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2012-04-17 Xinsheng Lou Fuzzy logic control and optimization system
US20100290975A1 (en) * 2009-03-31 2010-11-18 Alstom Technology Ltd Hot solids process selectively operable for combustion purposes and gasification purposes
DE102009034464A1 (de) * 2009-07-22 2011-08-18 Uhde GmbH, 44141 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Dehydrierung von Alkanen mit einer Vergleichmäßigung der Produktzusammensetzung
DE102009059310A1 (de) * 2009-12-23 2011-06-30 Solar Fuel GmbH, 70565 Hocheffizientes Verfahren zur katalytischen Methanisierung von Kohlendioxid und Wasserstoff enthaltenden Gasgemischen
CN101807069B (zh) * 2010-03-12 2012-04-18 西北化工研究院 一种湿法气流床煤气化工艺过程的控制系统
CN103279108A (zh) * 2013-06-05 2013-09-04 苏州市金翔钛设备有限公司 多釜串联反应器的控制系统

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2017503234A (ja) 2017-01-26
JP6779783B2 (ja) 2020-11-04
CN112230619B (zh) 2024-07-19
US10261479B2 (en) 2019-04-16
CA2930477A1 (fr) 2015-05-21
US20190196418A1 (en) 2019-06-27
JP2019145147A (ja) 2019-08-29
EP2874029A1 (fr) 2015-05-20
BR112016010785A2 (pt) 2017-08-08
KR101944165B1 (ko) 2019-01-30
PL3069201T3 (pl) 2018-05-30
DK3069201T3 (en) 2018-03-26
WO2015071259A1 (fr) 2015-05-21
US20160299477A1 (en) 2016-10-13
KR20160085846A (ko) 2016-07-18
CN112230619A (zh) 2021-01-15
EP3069201A1 (fr) 2016-09-21
ES2661829T3 (es) 2018-04-04
CA2930477C (fr) 2018-08-14
CN105849654A (zh) 2016-08-10
BR112016010785B1 (pt) 2021-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3069201B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation conçue pour réaliser au moins une réaction chimique
DE102008008500B3 (de) Verfahren zur rechnergestützten Konfiguration eines technischen Systems
EP3239908A1 (fr) Dispositif pour prévisions probabilistes, réseau de distribution d'énergie et/ou de transport d'énergie équipé d'un tel dispositif et son procédé de fonctionnement
EP3278186B1 (fr) Dispositif de commande d'un module de production, module de production équipé d'un dispositif de commande et procédé de fonctionnement du dispositif de commande
DE102018202731B4 (de) Produktionsverwaltungsvorrichtung und Produktionssystem
DE102010035982B4 (de) Verfahren zur Pressensteuerung bei einem Tiefziehprozess zur Herstellung von Blechbauteilen, insbesondere von Karosseriebauteilen
DE102019127550A1 (de) Verfahren für eine modellbasierte Optimierung eines Folienproduktes bei einer Herstellung auf einer Folienextrusionsanlage
WO2011151031A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour adapter un plan de déroulement de production pour un processus de production
WO2015161975A2 (fr) Optimisation d'une séquence de bandes à décaper basée sur la modélisation d'une ligne de décapage
EP3224682B1 (fr) Procédé pour la configuration d'une installation de production conçue pour la réalisation d'au moins une réaction chimique
EP3992733A1 (fr) Planification de l'occupation des machines pour une installation de fabrication complexe
EP4500424B1 (fr) Optimisation d'un planning de production
EP3779619B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour la détermination de risques émergents d'un système technique
DE102017118739A1 (de) Zellensteuersystem
DE102020130466A1 (de) Netzwerk zur Steuerung von Lötsystemen und Verfahren hierfür
EP3859458A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de conception d'un circuit de régulation
DE102010010551B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Koordinieren von zwei aufeinanderfolgenden Herstellungsstufen eines Produktionsprozesses
AT10872U1 (de) Verfahren zur selbsttätigen konfiguration von produkten und/oder dienstleistungen
WO2024217815A1 (fr) Procédé et système de traitement de données pour faire fonctionner et simuler une installation de fabrication, et installation de fabrication
DE102020213366A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bereitstellen eines Algorithmus maschinellen Lernens, Verfahren und System zur Klassifikation und/oder Regression von Prozessdaten und/oder Prozess-Metadaten
EP3165517A1 (fr) Installation et procede de fabrication d'alcools gras
DE102020103349A1 (de) Verfahren und system zur lastangleichung zweier prozessoren beim ausführen diversitär-redundanter anweisungssequenzen
DE4216699A1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum automatischen Schutz einer Anlage, insbesondere eines Kernkraftwerks
EP2871541A1 (fr) Procédé de conditionnement d'un outil destiné à configurer un dispositif de commande librement programmable
EP4657341A1 (fr) Optimisation de production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160615

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: BAYER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B01J 19/00 20060101ALI20170531BHEP

Ipc: G05B 13/02 20060101AFI20170531BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170718

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 956906

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014006692

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

Effective date: 20180320

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2661829

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20180404

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180320

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180320

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180321

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180420

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014006692

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180921

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20141111

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171220

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20211203

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20211109

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20211026

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20211027

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20211110

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20211027

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20211025

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20211027

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20211029

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20211027

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20221114

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20221027

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20221103

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20221130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 956906

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20221111

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20221130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20231229

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221112

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231130

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20231111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20221111

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231111

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20251104

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20251110

Year of fee payment: 12