EP4417367A1 - Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré - Google Patents

Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP4417367A1
EP4417367A1 EP23156853.6A EP23156853A EP4417367A1 EP 4417367 A1 EP4417367 A1 EP 4417367A1 EP 23156853 A EP23156853 A EP 23156853A EP 4417367 A1 EP4417367 A1 EP 4417367A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
web
binder
convex
accumulations
abrasive
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
EP23156853.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Jörn-Oliver NOLTE
Dennis Senning
Florian Koch
Sören Leffers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vsm Vereinigte Schmirgel und Maschinen Fabriken Ag
Original Assignee
Vsm Vereinigte Schmirgel und Maschinen Fabriken Ag
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Vsm Vereinigte Schmirgel und Maschinen Fabriken Ag filed Critical Vsm Vereinigte Schmirgel und Maschinen Fabriken Ag
Priority to EP23156853.6A priority Critical patent/EP4417367A1/fr
Priority to DE202024106303.1U priority patent/DE202024106303U1/de
Priority to EP24704440.7A priority patent/EP4665533A1/fr
Priority to PCT/EP2024/053432 priority patent/WO2024170470A1/fr
Publication of EP4417367A1 publication Critical patent/EP4417367A1/fr
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D11/00—Constructional features of flexible abrasive materials; Special features in the manufacture of such materials
    • B24D11/001—Manufacture of flexible abrasive materials
    • B24D11/005—Making abrasive webs
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D11/00—Constructional features of flexible abrasive materials; Special features in the manufacture of such materials
    • B24D11/001—Manufacture of flexible abrasive materials
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D3/00—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents
    • B24D3/02—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent
    • B24D3/20—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent and being essentially organic
    • B24D3/28—Resins or natural or synthetic macromolecular compounds

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a structured abrasive and a method for its production.
  • the abrasive generally has a base, e.g. a web-shaped base made of a solid or flexible material, onto which a binder layer based on e.g. phenol and abrasive grains absorbed in the binder layer are applied.
  • the grains can be made of ⁇ -aluminum oxide or other materials.
  • the grains can be broken abrasive grains; furthermore, shaped abrasive grains are known which are individually shaped, dried and/or sintered/calcined, e.g. by a sol-gel process, and which, due to their uniform shape and suitable alignment, enable uniform abrasive engagement.
  • the binding agent layer and the grains are applied to the substrates by scattering pre-prepared grains, e.g. gravimetrically or electrostatically, so that they are absorbed into the binding agent layer that has already been applied. This temporarily fixes the grain on the substrate.
  • the binding agent layer is then cured. Thermally initiated, radiation-curing, and chemical curing using appropriate binding agents or hardeners/initiators are known.
  • the gravimetric or electrostatic spreading of the grains has the disadvantage that the production process involves several individual steps, which can have a negative impact on process reliability.
  • the hardening of the entire surface of the substrate coated with binder is also energy-intensive.
  • Abrasives produced by gravimetric or electrostatic scattering have the disadvantage that the surface of the abrasive is uneven on a microscale, since in particular the height of the abrasive can vary, e.g. when several grains are superimposed.
  • a binder-grain mixture is placed on a molding tape, whereby the molding tape contains depressions and is then brought into contact with a base so that the binder-grain mixture on the molding tape or in the depressions of the molding tape adheres to the base over its entire surface.
  • the molding tape and the base are then exposed together to electromagnetic radiation, which passes through the molding tape and hardens the binder. Finally, the molding tape is separated from the finished abrasive.
  • This process has the disadvantage that hardened residues of the binder-grain mixture remain on the impression belt or in the depressions of the impression belt, which makes it necessary to clean the impression belt or to accept losses in process continuity.
  • the impression belt is also a wearing part that will have to be replaced after a certain time.
  • the high-energy UV radiation contributes to the embrittlement of the impression belt.
  • the abrasives produced with the impression belt have the disadvantage that the flexibility of the entire abrasive is impaired by the hardened binder-grain mixture adhering to the entire surface of the substrate.
  • the object of the invention is therefore to provide a structured abrasive and a method for its production which enable safe, cost-effective production and good grinding properties.
  • the structured abrasive according to the invention can be produced in particular by a process according to the invention.
  • the binder-grain mixture preferably comprises curing initiators such as Type I or Type II photoinitiators for curing by UV radiant energy and/or thermal peroxide-based initiators and/or thermal azo compound-based initiators for curing by thermal radiant energy.
  • curing initiators such as Type I or Type II photoinitiators for curing by UV radiant energy and/or thermal peroxide-based initiators and/or thermal azo compound-based initiators for curing by thermal radiant energy.
  • the binder-grain mixture can contain fillers such as chalk, cryolite, potassium tetrafluoroborate (KBF 4 ), wollastonite and/or kaolin.
  • fillers such as chalk, cryolite, potassium tetrafluoroborate (KBF 4 ), wollastonite and/or kaolin.
  • Additives that can be used in the binder-grain mixture include pyrogenic silica to adjust the rheology, silane compounds to promote adhesion between the binder and the abrasive grain, defoamers, deaerators, dispersing additives, flow control agents, and/or color pigments.
  • the web-shaped substrate as well as the binder and the grains of the binder-grain mixture can further contain a variety of different materials, which are described in more detail in the following subclaims and can be combined with the above-mentioned curing initiators, fillers and/or additives.
  • the at least partial or complete hardening by radiation energy can be carried out by any type of radiation energy, for example UV, electron, thermal radiation energy, especially infrared radiation, or by a combination of different types of radiation energy. Curing using UV radiation energy is particularly preferred because it enables particularly energy-efficient and positionally precise curing of the binder-grain mixture.
  • the convex accumulations applied by screen printing have a height h and a base area with a diameter d (see also Figure 3A ), with the base area being arranged on the side of the convex accumulations facing the substrate.
  • the convex accumulations preferably correspond to hemispherical structures, whereby hemispherical in this case is not to be regarded in the strict mathematical sense, whereby the height h would have to correspond to half the diameter d of the base area, but should merely describe the basic shape of the applied structures.
  • the application process is preferably carried out using a screen printing process that has a roller-shaped screen printing stencil (rotary screen printing). This enables a continuous process.
  • screen printing stencils in a different form, for example using flat screen printing frames.
  • Other known printing processes can also be used.
  • the binder-grain mixture preferably has a viscosity such that it is easy to process during the printing process. Viscosities in the range of 1000 mPa*s to 10000 mPa*s are advantageous, ideally 3000 mPa*s to 8000 mPa*s (at 20°C and a shear rate of 100 1/s). The shape of the convex accumulations is largely retained after application, but at least until partial or complete hardening. The binder-grain mixture therefore needs to exhibit structural viscosity.
  • the method according to the invention has the advantage that a high level of process reliability is possible through the single-stage method described.
  • structured abrasives can be produced in a cost-effective manner.
  • the shape of the convex accumulations enables optimal penetration of the radiation energy during at least partial or complete hardening, which means that greater layer thicknesses of the grinding layer can be hardened than with a conventional, full-surface application.
  • This advantage is made possible in particular by the absence of a molding tape, which absorbs a large proportion of the radiation energy. This avoids combined hardening from UV radiation and additional thermal energy, which is necessary when the layer thickness is too high or the radiation intensity is too low.
  • a structured abrasive which was preferably produced according to a method according to the invention, has a web-shaped base and an abrasive layer, wherein the abrasive layer has hardened convex accumulations, e.g. hemispherical structures, made of a binder-grain mixture, and wherein free areas remain on the web-shaped base between the convex accumulations.
  • the binder-grain mixture can contain the above-mentioned fillers, additives and/or curing initiators.
  • the convex accumulations preferably have substantially the same height.
  • the grains of the binder-grain mixture are distributed substantially homogeneously in the hardened convex accumulations.
  • the structured abrasive according to the invention has the advantage that a homogeneous grinding pattern is produced due to the convex accumulations when grinding a workpiece. This is made possible in particular by convex accumulations of essentially the same height. Alternatively, however, different heights of the convex accumulations can also be provided; preferably, the height of the convex accumulations can be distributed in a range from 5% to 30% of the average height.
  • the convex accumulations have base areas on the side facing the web-shaped base, whereby the base areas of the convex accumulations do not cover the entire surface of the web-shaped base.
  • the open spaces on the web-shaped base provide the structured abrasive with a very high level of flexibility. In addition, these open spaces create chip spaces between the convex accumulations and ensure high stock removal and good heat dissipation.
  • the convex accumulations offer a "rounded tip" at the beginning of a grinding process, unlike other geometric shapes such as cuboids or rectangles. Due to the small area that penetrates into a material surface at the beginning of the grinding process, the initial breaking up of the convex accumulations is facilitated and the resharpening process is activated. After this, a uniform removal of the abrasive down to the carrier is possible (see Fig. 3A to 3C ).
  • convex accumulations in the form of hemispherical structures do not offer a linear increase in the surface of the grinding layer directly involved in the grinding process with a workpiece, but an exponential one. This results in a more constant This allows the user to apply pressure throughout the entire grinding process.
  • the user achieves a longer service life with a hemispherical structure, as the hemispherical structures have a higher geometry-related abrasive mass volume than, for example, pyramids.
  • the primer layer preferably consists of UV-curable (meth)acrylates with surface-affine functional groups.
  • a primer layer can improve adhesion of the binder-grain mixture to the web-shaped substrate, thereby increasing the mechanical stability and durability of the abrasive produced.
  • the at least partial or complete hardening of the primer layer and its general use are merely optional, as this step can be omitted and the primer layer is also hardened by radiation energy when the applied binder-grain mixture hardens at least partially or completely.
  • One embodiment of the structured abrasive has a primer layer as an adhesion promoter between the web-shaped substrate and the abrasive layer, which enables the advantages already described.
  • the screen printing stencil is preferably formed by a roller with recesses, past which the web-shaped substrate is guided, whereby the binding agent-grain mixture is guided into the interior of the roller and is passed through the recesses onto the web-shaped substrate with the help of a squeegee.
  • the recesses are preferably round, but other shapes such as squares, triangles, polygons or polygons are also possible.
  • a wall thickness in the range of 100 to 1100 ⁇ m makes it possible to apply a layer thickness that is sufficient for a long service life of the abrasive, depending on the size of the convex accumulations.
  • Wall thicknesses in the range of 100 to 500 ⁇ m, preferably 150 to 400 ⁇ m, have proven to be particularly advantageous for hand grinding.
  • Wall thicknesses in the range of 400 to 1100 ⁇ m, preferably 450 to 900 have proven to be particularly advantageous for machine grinding.
  • thinner layer thicknesses are sufficient because less pressure is applied to the workpiece than in machine grinding applications. The lower pressure means that the service life of the abrasive is longer.
  • thinner wall thicknesses of the screen printing stencils allow smaller clusters to be printed without the clusters flowing into one another. Smaller clusters increase the flexibility of the abrasive, which is an advantage especially in hand sanding applications.
  • the number of recesses per inch, together with the size of these recesses, indicates how much of the surface area of the web-shaped backing is covered by base areas of convex accumulations and how much area remains as free space. This in turn significantly influences the flexibility of the structured abrasive article.
  • the diameter of the recesses, the layer thickness of the stencil and the squeegee position within the stencil have a relevant influence on the dimensions, in particular the height h and diameter d of the convex accumulations.
  • the size of the convex accumulations can thus be changed quickly and easily by using a different screen printing stencil, preferably without changing the recipe of the binder-grain mixture.
  • the pressure required for the structured abrasive to be produced during the grinding process depends on the choice of the size of the convex accumulations, with large convex accumulations requiring more pressure during grinding than smaller convex accumulations.
  • the process thus makes it possible to flexibly produce different structured abrasives. This means that the structured abrasive to be produced can be specifically optimized for different applications, preferably without making a recipe adjustment.
  • Convex accumulations which are produced using screen printing stencils with recesses in the range of 250 ⁇ m to 6000 ⁇ m, preferably 420 to 4000 ⁇ m, have the advantage that an abrasive product can be produced that can produce particularly high-quality surfaces. For this purpose, only a small amount of pressure is required when grinding, for example with convex accumulations in the form of hemispherical structures.
  • the durability of the abrasive can also be influenced by the selection of the convex accumulations. Another advantage is the high flexibility of the abrasive, which can therefore adapt well to the workpiece during the grinding process.
  • Screen printing stencils with recesses in the range of 250 to 1500 ⁇ m produce small convex accumulations for particularly flexible abrasives that are used in hand grinding.
  • Recesses in the range of 1500 to 5000 ⁇ m are preferably used in machine grinding, where there are higher demands on pressure and durability during the grinding process.
  • the convex accumulations on the web-shaped base are also randomly arranged in some areas.
  • Randomly arranged in some areas means In particular, this means that the positions of the centers of the convex accumulations on the web-shaped substrate in one area do not follow an ordered, repeating pattern, for example they are not arranged in a square grid.
  • the size of the random area can be freely selected within limits. For example, within a circle with eight times the diameter of the average diameter of the convex accumulations, no ordered, repeating pattern of the centers of the convex accumulations in the circle should be recognizable, whereby the position of the circle can be freely selected.
  • the relative arrangement of the convex accumulations repeats itself.
  • the advantage of the convex accumulations being randomly arranged in some areas is that the homogeneity of the grinding pattern on a workpiece to be processed is further improved.
  • the arranged convex accumulations have base surfaces on the side facing the web-shaped substrate, wherein the convex accumulations have a diameter d in the range from 250 to 6000 ⁇ m, preferably 420 to 4000 ⁇ m, more preferably 600 to 3000 ⁇ m and a height h in the range from 100 to 1300 ⁇ m, preferably 150 to 900 ⁇ m, more preferably 300 to 700 ⁇ m, more preferably 500 to 1100 ⁇ m, and/or the base surfaces cover 20% to 75%, preferably 50% to 70% of the web-shaped substrate and/or the base surfaces have a distance a from one another in the range from 0 to 3500 ⁇ m, preferably 50 to 3000 ⁇ m and/or the open areas make up 80% to 25%, preferably 30% to 50% of the web-shaped substrate.
  • the hemispheres should preferably have a distance of at least 50 ⁇ m to ensure the flexibility of the abrasive.
  • Covering 20% to 75% of the sheet substrate with the bases of the convex mounds corresponds to the number of recesses per inch described above and has the same advantages.
  • a proportion of 80% to 25% open space ensures the flexibility of the abrasive.
  • a distance a between the base surfaces in the range of 0 to 3500 ⁇ m, preferably 50 to 3000 ⁇ m, ensures that no full-surface binder layer is applied to the web-shaped base. This allows the web-shaped base to retain its full flexibility between the convex accumulations. Even workpieces to be ground with tight radii can be processed without any problems. Distances a of 50 to 1500 ⁇ m are advantageous for hand grinding and 500 to 3000 ⁇ m for machine grinding. The distance a also helps to dissipate heat, as the chip can quickly leave the grinding zone. In addition, it can no longer damage the surface of the structured abrasive. By specifically creating the contact points in the grinding process through the number of convex accumulations, the heat input into the workpiece is also directly influenced. A more open structure introduces less heat into the workpiece.
  • the convex accumulations have a partially random arrangement on the web-shaped substrate
  • An offset of N successive convex accumulations in the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base by an offset distance v of at least 5% of their average diameter Q orthogonal to the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base represents a criterion for randomness, which enables a sufficiently homogeneous grinding pattern. Furthermore, the random arrangement can prevent the formation of kinks in the abrasive compared to abrasives with evenly spaced convex accumulations. This prevents the creation of so-called chatter marks on the workpiece.
  • the larger N is selected, the larger the area in which the convex accumulations are randomly distributed.
  • the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base corresponds to the subsequent grinding direction of the structured abrasive and is defined by the longest extension of the web-shaped base.
  • the orthogonal direction Q lies in the plane of the web-shaped base and is orthogonal, i.e. perpendicular to the longitudinal direction L.
  • the average diameters are calculated in a known manner by averaging the diameters d of the hemispherical structures considered, analogous to the FEPA standard.
  • the offset distance v is determined as the deviation of the respective centers of the convex accumulations in the direction Q from the longitudinal direction L.
  • an acrylate binder allows a lower pressure of the structured abrasive during the grinding process than is possible with conventionally coated abrasives with phenol-based binders.
  • UV-curable binders enables particularly energy-efficient and targeted curing of the binder using UV light.
  • the process requires less space in the production plant than would be the case with conventionally scattered abrasives with phenolic resin-based binders.
  • a shorter production time and thus an increased throughput in relation to the plant size is possible than with conventionally scattered abrasives with phenolic resin-based binders.
  • the blended fabric is preferably highly flexible, medium flexible, flexible, medium stiff, stiff or very stiff.
  • An appropriate choice of grains enables the use of grain properties that are individually tailored to the application of the structured abrasive.
  • semi-precious corundum is used as it offers a good cost-benefit ratio for a wide range of applications.
  • the grains of the binder-grain mixture have an average diameter in the range of 7 to 200 ⁇ m, preferably 7 to 125 ⁇ m.
  • the mean diameter of the grains is determined analogously to the FEPA standard from the mean values of the diameters of the grains considered.
  • Grains with average diameters in the range of 7 to 200 ⁇ m have proven to be particularly advantageous because this grain size range covers the application of surface finishing up to a mirror-like surface.
  • the binding system is able to hold the abrasive grain and at the same time ensure sufficient self-sharpening of the abrasive.
  • the volume ratio of grains to binder in the binder-grain mixture is in the range of 0.4 to 1.5, preferably in the range of 0.5 to 1.2.
  • a corresponding volume ratio has proven to be particularly advantageous because in this range an optimal grinding performance is consistent with a suitable processing viscosity for the screen printing process.
  • the free surfaces are interconnected and form a two-dimensional network structure.
  • the two-dimensional network structure forms in the plane of the web-shaped substrate and enables sufficient flexibility of the structured abrasive.
  • Step a) is carried out by unwinding the web-shaped base 1 from a roll.
  • the web-shaped base 1 consists of cotton, polyester, mixed fabric, paper and/or vulcanized fiber. Any combination of the aforementioned components is possible.
  • the web-shaped base 1 is guided through the entire device via rollers, whereby steps a) to g) of the method are carried out.
  • Step b) is carried out by supplying primer 19 provided in a primer container 8 to a primer doctor blade 10, for example by means of a pump (not shown), wherein the primer 19 is applied to the web-shaped substrate 1 as a primer layer 19 by means of the primer doctor blade 10.
  • the primer layer 19 preferably consists of surface-affine acrylate compounds, which represents a particularly good adhesion promoter.
  • the solid arrow outlines the direction of rotation of the roller-like screen printing stencil 16, wherein the squeegee holder 14 is arranged within the roller-like screen printing stencil 16 in such a way that it does not rotate and the squeegee 11 is stationary.
  • Convex accumulations 2 preferably hemispherical structures, consisting of the binder-grain mixture 15 are applied to the web-shaped substrate 1 through recesses in the screen printing stencil 16.
  • the convex accumulations 2 form the abrasive layer 18 of the structured abrasive 6.
  • the viscosity of the binder-grain mixture 15 is selected such that the shape of the convex accumulations 2 is largely retained between steps e) and f).
  • step f) the applied binder-grain mixture 15 is at least partially or completely hardened by means of a radiator 13.
  • partial hardening by means of a radiator 13 is sufficient, since complete hardening is achieved, for example, by subsequent thermal treatment. However, complete hardening of the binding agent-grain mixture 15 is preferred.
  • an extraction system 7 is also provided. This ensures a safe working environment.
  • step g) the web-shaped substrate 1 is rolled up, which is now coated with a primer layer 19 and convex accumulations 2 of a binder-grain mixture 15 arranged thereon, whereby a structured abrasive 6 is provided.
  • the web-shaped substrate 1, which is coated with primer layer 19, convex accumulations 2 as abrasive layer 18, can be coated with additional layers (not shown).
  • Fig. 3A to 3C show a schematic side view of a grinding process with a structured abrasive 6.
  • the Fig. 3A to 3C represent different degrees of wear of one and the same structured abrasive 6, which wears during the grinding process on a workpiece 5.
  • the structured abrasive 6 has a web-shaped base 1 on which the convex accumulations 2 forming an abrasive layer 13, which in the present case correspond to hemispherical structures, are arranged from a binder-grain mixture 15.
  • the convex accumulations 2 have a base area 20 with a diameter d and a height h.
  • the convex accumulations 2 are spaced apart from one another by a distance of a.
  • the dimensions of the convex accumulations 2 are in the range of 250 to 6000 ⁇ m for the diameter d and 100 to 1100 ⁇ m for the height h.
  • the distance a between the base surfaces 20 of the hemispherical structures 2 is in the range from 0 to 3500 ⁇ m.
  • the convex accumulations 2 consist of a binder-grain mixture 15, which consists of binder 4 and grains 3.
  • the volume ratio of grains 3 to binder 4 is in the range of 0.4 to 1.5, preferably in the range 0.5 to 1.2.
  • the binder is formed by acrylates, polyester acrylates, polyether acrylates, epoxy acrylates, urethane acrylates as oligomeric components, acrylate monomers, and/or methacrylate monomers.
  • the grains are formed by normal corundum, semi-precious corundum, precious corundum, ceramic alumina, zirconium alumina, silicon carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, sol-gel alumina and/or formed sol-gel alumina.
  • An advantage of the structured abrasive 6, comprising an abrasive layer 18 with convex accumulations 2 in the form of hemispherical structures is Fig. 3A to 3C Compared to other geometric shapes such as pyramids or Cones do not result in a linear increase in the surface of the grinding layer 18 that is directly involved in the grinding process with the workpiece 5, but rather an exponential increase. This enables the user to apply a more constant pressure to the structured abrasive 6 during the entire grinding process. In addition, the user achieves a longer service life for the structured abrasive 6 with the hemispherical structure, since there is a higher abrasive mass volume than with a pyramid, for example.
  • Fig.4 shows a schematic top view of a structured abrasive 6, having convex accumulations 2 in the form of hemispherical structures consisting of a binder-grain mixture 15 with diameter d.
  • the convex accumulations 2 are arranged in regions on a web-shaped base 1 due to the selection of a screen printing stencil 16, which has randomly arranged recesses in certain regions. Between the convex accumulations 2 there are open spaces 21 which form a two-dimensional network structure 22. This enables a high degree of flexibility of the structured abrasive 6.
  • a measure of the randomness of the arrangement is the offset v of the centers of the convex accumulations 2 in a direction Q transverse to the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base 1.
  • the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base 1 corresponds to the later grinding direction of the structured abrasive 6.
  • the centers of five consecutive hemispherical structures 2 in the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base 1 are offset by an offset distance v of at least 5% of their mean diameter transversely (also orthogonally) Q to the longitudinal direction L of the web-shaped base, whereby the offset distances v of the five convex accumulations 2 considered differ.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
EP23156853.6A 2023-02-15 2023-02-15 Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré Pending EP4417367A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP23156853.6A EP4417367A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2023-02-15 Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré
DE202024106303.1U DE202024106303U1 (de) 2023-02-15 2024-02-12 Strukturiertes Schleifmittel
EP24704440.7A EP4665533A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2024-02-12 Procédé de production d'un élément abrasif structuré et élément abrasif structuré
PCT/EP2024/053432 WO2024170470A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2024-02-12 Procédé de production d'un élément abrasif structuré et élément abrasif structuré

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP23156853.6A EP4417367A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2023-02-15 Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP4417367A1 true EP4417367A1 (fr) 2024-08-21

Family

ID=85251723

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP23156853.6A Pending EP4417367A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2023-02-15 Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré
EP24704440.7A Pending EP4665533A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2024-02-12 Procédé de production d'un élément abrasif structuré et élément abrasif structuré

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP24704440.7A Pending EP4665533A1 (fr) 2023-02-15 2024-02-12 Procédé de production d'un élément abrasif structuré et élément abrasif structuré

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (2) EP4417367A1 (fr)
DE (1) DE202024106303U1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2024170470A1 (fr)

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1994015752A1 (fr) 1993-01-14 1994-07-21 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Procede de fabrication d'un article abrasif
US5984988A (en) 1992-07-23 1999-11-16 Minnesota Minning & Manufacturing Company Shaped abrasive particles and method of making same
DE69511068T2 (de) * 1994-02-22 2000-04-06 Minnesota Mining And Mfg. Co. Schleifartikel, verfahren zum herstellen derselben, und verfahren zum anwenden desselben bei endbearbeitung
EP1173306A1 (fr) * 1999-04-23 2002-01-23 3M Innovative Properties Company Procede de polissage du verre
EP1526949A1 (fr) * 2002-07-26 2005-05-04 3M Innovative Properties Company Produit abrasif, son procede de fabrication et d'utilisation, et appareil de fabrication associe
US20050227590A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Chien-Min Sung Fixed abrasive tools and associated methods
US20120252329A1 (en) * 2009-12-22 2012-10-04 Wald Charles R Flexible abrasive article and methods of making

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5984988A (en) 1992-07-23 1999-11-16 Minnesota Minning & Manufacturing Company Shaped abrasive particles and method of making same
WO1994015752A1 (fr) 1993-01-14 1994-07-21 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Procede de fabrication d'un article abrasif
DE69511068T2 (de) * 1994-02-22 2000-04-06 Minnesota Mining And Mfg. Co. Schleifartikel, verfahren zum herstellen derselben, und verfahren zum anwenden desselben bei endbearbeitung
EP1173306A1 (fr) * 1999-04-23 2002-01-23 3M Innovative Properties Company Procede de polissage du verre
EP1526949A1 (fr) * 2002-07-26 2005-05-04 3M Innovative Properties Company Produit abrasif, son procede de fabrication et d'utilisation, et appareil de fabrication associe
US20050227590A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Chien-Min Sung Fixed abrasive tools and associated methods
US20120252329A1 (en) * 2009-12-22 2012-10-04 Wald Charles R Flexible abrasive article and methods of making

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE202024106303U1 (de) 2024-11-20
EP4665533A1 (fr) 2025-12-24
WO2024170470A1 (fr) 2024-08-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE69803995T2 (de) Strukturierte schleifartikel mit verbundenen funktionellen pulvern
DE10226358B4 (de) Verbesserte konstruierte Schleifmittel
DE69200771T2 (de) Verfahren zum Bilden einer gemusterten Oberfläche auf einem Substrat.
RU2602581C2 (ru) Абразивные частицы, имеющие сложные формы, и способы их формования
DE102008029517A1 (de) Schleifmittel für einen Strahlprozess sowie Strahlbehandlungsverfahren unter dessen Verwendung
EP3083870B1 (fr) Procédé de fabrication de particules abrasives multicouches
DE60204354T2 (de) Abrasives produkt und verfahren für dessen herstellung
DE69809442T2 (de) Gemusterte schleifwerkzeuge
DE69125086T2 (de) Mit erodierbaren Konglomeraten überzogener Schleifkörper und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung
DE2918103C2 (de) Verfahren zum Auftragen eines Grundbindemittels und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung desselben
DE69119690T2 (de) Presswalze für Papiermaschinen
DE69729476T2 (de) Tiefdruckverfahren zur herstellung von strukturierten schleifoberflächen
EP4566756A2 (fr) Particules abrasives présentant des formes particulières et procédés permettant de former lesdites particules
DE69806961T2 (de) Dauerhafte schleifartikel mit dicken abrasiven beschichtungen
DE2224589A1 (de) Schleifmittel und verfahren zu dessen herstellung
DE60108667T2 (de) Schleifgegenstand mit einem geprägten träger und verfahren zur herstellung desselben
DE112015003830T5 (de) Schleifgegenstand mit Schleifmittel auf Unterlage mit gebündelten Strukturen aus Schleifpartikeln und Verfahren zur Herstellung
DE202014101741U1 (de) Teilweise beschichtetes Schleifkorn
EP2692820A1 (fr) Grain abrasif avec corps de base, soulèvement et ouverture
EP2692813A1 (fr) Grain abrasif avec soulèvements de différentes hauteurs
EP1208945A1 (fr) Méthode pour appliquer des particules sur un support
DE69211137T2 (de) Mit einem Vielpunktschnittwerkzeug, planiertes, beschichtetes Schleifmittel
DE69806029T2 (de) Schleifprodukt und schleifverfahren
EP4417367A1 (fr) Procédé de fabrication d'un abrasif structuré et abrasif structuré
EP1827762B1 (fr) Produit abrasif et son procede de production

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20240827

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC ME MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR