IE51118B1 - Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers - Google Patents

Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers

Info

Publication number
IE51118B1
IE51118B1 IE1360/81A IE136081A IE51118B1 IE 51118 B1 IE51118 B1 IE 51118B1 IE 1360/81 A IE1360/81 A IE 1360/81A IE 136081 A IE136081 A IE 136081A IE 51118 B1 IE51118 B1 IE 51118B1
Authority
IE
Ireland
Prior art keywords
zinc oxide
fiber
accordance
oxide particles
range
Prior art date
Application number
IE1360/81A
Other versions
IE811360L (en
Original Assignee
Du Pont
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Du Pont filed Critical Du Pont
Publication of IE811360L publication Critical patent/IE811360L/en
Publication of IE51118B1 publication Critical patent/IE51118B1/en

Links

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F8/00Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F8/18Conjugated, i.e. bi- or multicomponent, artificial filaments or the like; Manufacture thereof from other substances
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D01NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
    • D01FCHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
    • D01F6/00Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
    • D01F6/58Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products
    • D01F6/70Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from homopolycondensation products from polyurethanes

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Artificial Filaments (AREA)

Abstract

A spandex fiber characterised in that, for increasing the resistance of the fiber to chlorine-induced degradation, the fiber contains an effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide having a purity of at least 99.4%.

Description

This invention relates to spandex fibers intended for use in chlorinated aqueous environments, such as are encountered in swimming pools. In particular, the invention concerns such fibers containing finely divided sine oxide.
Spandex fibers, made from long chain synthetic polymers comprised of at least 85% of segmented polyurethanes, are well-known in the art. Yarns of such fibers have been used to produce attractive fabrics, which are useful for, among other things, swimwear. However, the water .in swimming pools is chlorinated to such an extent that the active chlorine content is usually between 0.5 and 3 ppm (parts per million) or higher. Exposure of polyurethane spandex fibers in such an environment can result in degradation of the physical properties (e.g., toughness) of the fiber. From a practical standpoint, some degradation can be tolerated without its effects being noticeable to the user of fabrics made with these fibers. Nonetheless, improvements in the resistance to chlorine-induced degradation is needed, especially for yarns of low denier (e.g., less than 100 denier). It «is an object of this invention to provide such an improvement.
The present invention provides a spandex fiber with improved resistance to chlorine-induced degradation by having an effective amount of finely divided high purity zinc oxide dispersed in the fiber. Zinc oxide assaying at least 99.4% ZnO, preferably at least 99.7% ZnO, is suitable for use in this invention. Zinc oxide concentrations as low as onehalf percent or as high as ten percent or more can be effective, but the preferred concentration of the zinc oxide is in the range of 1 to 3% based on the weight of the fiber. The preferred mean particle size is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron. - 3 As used herein the tern fiber includes staple fibers and/or continuous filaments.
Throughout this specification, percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
S In accordance with the present invention, the effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide can vary over a fairly broad range. Improvements inresistance to chlorine-induced degradation are obtained at zinc oxide concentrations as low as 1/2%. However, larger improvements are obtained when the concentration is at least 1%. Although large concentrations of zinc oxide in the fiber (e.g., 10% or more) can sometimes be used, a concentration of less than 5% usually is used because excessive amounts of the additive adversely affect some of the physical properties of the fiber (as produced) as compared to the same .fiber without the zinc oxide additive. The preferred range of concentrations of zinc oxide in the fiber is therefore 1 to 3%.
The zinc oxide additive, in accordance with the present invention, is finely divided. This permits a more homogeneous distribution of the zinc oxide in the fiber than could be obtained if the zinc oxide particles were larger. Generally, small particle sizes are used, such as those having a mean size of less than 5 microns. Particles that have a mean size of greater than 5 microns can lead to difficulties in fiber spinning, and, therefore, arc generally avoided. Commercially available zinc oxide particles having a mean size of 0.1 micron, or even somewhat smaller, are satisfactory. The preferred range of mean particle size is 0.1 to 1 micron.
Zinc oxide of high purity (e.g., at least 99.4% ZnO) is suitable for use in the present invention.
Although less pure zinc oxide can provide some improvement in resistance to chlorine-induced degradation, the higher purity material provides much better chlorinedegradation resistance and fewer adverse effects on physical properties and whiteness retention of the fiber. The high purity zinc oxide can be made by oxidizing zinc metal as in the indirect or French Frocess or an equivalent thereof. In contrast the direct” or American Process does not provide zinc oxide of as high purity. Among the suitable, high purity commercially available zinc oxides are AZO77 (sold by ASARCO of Columbus, Ohio), KADOX-15 (sold by New Jersey Zinc Company of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania), zinc oxide-^-20 or^911 (sold by St. Joe Zinc Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) and U.S.P. zinc oxide (sold hy Mallinckrodt of St. Louis, Missouri).
An indication of the purity of the zinc oxide is provided by the sulfur content of the zinc oxide. Elemental analysis has indicated that impurities in the zinc oxide frequently contain cadmium, cqlcium, copper, iron, lead, magnesium, potassium, sodium, sulfur, etc. A convenient measure of the general level of the impurity content of the zinc oxide is its sulfur content. The high purity zinc oxide used in the present invention generally has a sulfur content of no more than 0.025% and preferably no more than 0.005%.
In the process of making spandex fibers according to the present invention, which process includes dissolving a long chain synthetic polymer comprising at least 85% segmented polyurethane in an organic solvent and then dry spinning the solution through orifices into filaments, an effective amount of zinc oxide particles, preferably amounting to at least one-half percent and as much as ten percent or more by weight of the polymer, is dispersed within the filaments. The zinc oxide particles can be added at any of several points in the preparation of the spandex fibers. For exanple, the zinc oxide may be added as slurry to a solution or dispersion of other additives and then mixed with or injected into .the polymer solution upstream of the fiber-spinning orifices. Of course, the zinc oxide particles can be added separately to the polymer spinning solutionas a dry powder oc as a slurry in a suitable medium.
As indicated above, the improved spandex fibers of the present invention are made from segmented polyurethane polymers, such, as those based on polyethers, polyesters, polyetheresters and the like. Such fibers are prepared by well-known methods , such as those described in U.S. Patent Specifications Nos. 2,929,804, 3,097,192, 3,428,711, 3,553,290 and 3,555,115. Some of these spandex polymers are more susceptible than others to chlorine-induced degradation. This can be seen, for example, by comparing the results of Example I below, which concerned spandex fibers made from polyether-based polyurethane, with the results of Example II, which concerned spandex fibers made from polyester-based polyurethane. As shown by.these Examples, spandex fibers, such as those made from polyether-based polyurethanes, benefit more than others from the inclusion of zinc oxide particles in accordance with the invention. For this reason, embodiments of the invention that include polyether-based polyurethanes are preferred.
The spandex fibers of the invention may also contain a variety of additives for different purposes, such as delustrants, antioxidants, dyes, stabilizers against heat, light and fumes, etc. so long as such additives do not produce antagonistic effects with the zinc oxide. Also, when finishing or dyeing yarns or fabrics made from fibers of the invention, care must be exercised to avoid deactivating or dissolving the zinc oxide.
The following test procedures are used for measuring the various parameters discussed above.
The concentration of zinc oxide in the fiber is determined as follows. A weighed sample of fiber is ashed in a platinum dish in a muffle furnance at 800°C for 10 minutes. The thusly formed residue is dissolved in 50% HCl solution. Insolubles are removed by filtration. Then, in accordance with the procedures described in Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorptions, Perkin-Elmer Corp, of Norwalk, Connecticut (1973) , the filtrate is analyzed with a Perkin-Elmer Model 370 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (or equivalent) equipped with a zinc lamp and calibrated with a sample containing a known amount of zinc oxide. The zinc oxide concentration is then calculated as a percent of the total weight of the fiber.
The purity of the zinc oxide can be measured by means of a potassium ferrocyanide titration as described in Commercial Methods of Analyses by F.O. Snell and F. M. Biffen, McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., New York [1944] pages 504-506. The sulfur content of the zinc oxide can be measured by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. A Philips model PW-1400 X-ray spectrometer equipped with a graphite crystal in a vacuum atmosphere and an X-ray tube with a silver target is suitable. The spectrophotometer is operated at 50,000 volts and 40 milliamps. The response of the line of sulfur is measured according to the general directions of the PW-1400 operation manual published by NV Philips Gloeilampanfabrieken, Eindhoven, The Netherlands [1980]. The instrument is calibrated by analysing samples of zinc oxide found by other means to contain no detectable quantities of sulfur and to - 7 which known amounts of potassium sulfate were added.
The mean size of the zinc oxide particles in the fiber is measured by Joyce-Loebl-Disk-Centrifuge techniques in accordance with procedures described in Instruction Manual for ICI-Joyce Loebl Disk Centrifuge Mk-III with Photosedimentometer, Joyce Loebl Co. Ltd., Durham, England. Usually, the mean particle size in the fiber is about equal to the size of the particles fed to the polymer solution used in preparing the fibers. Very little reduction in particle size' occurs in the process of^making the fibers containing the zinc oxide.
Toughness of the spandex fiber is defined as the product of the break tenacity and break elongation and is measured on an Instron machine. A 2-inch (5.1-cm) length of yarn of known denier is suspended between the clamps of an Instron Model TM testing machine, equipped with a tensile load cell of A capacity. The sample is elongated at the rate of 20 inches/minute (51 cm/min). The percent elongation at yarn break (break elongation) and the retractive force in grams at yarn break, divided by the original denier of the yarn (break tenacity) are recorded.
All testing is carried out at 70s? (21°C) and 65% relative humidity after the yarns have been brought to equilibrium with those conditions. Three test samples are averaged for each determination.
To test the resistance of the spandex fibers to chlorine-induced degradation, an 8-inch (20-cra.) long sample of yarn (e.g., 4-fjlament, 40 denier) made from the fibers is subjected to a “chlorinated-water exposure test. In this test, the yarn is extended to 150% of its original length and then, while maintained extended, is immersed for 24 or 72 hours in a stirred water bath of about 150-liter volume, maintained at about 22®C, a pH of 7.5 by addition of hydrochloric acid, and an active chlorine concentration of 3 parts per million by addition of sodium hypochloride solution. After exposure, the sample is dried and its physical properties measured as described in the preceding paragraph. The performance of yarns in the chlorinated-water exposure test correlates with the performance of corresponding yarns in swimwear fabrics exposed in chlorinated swimming pools.
The concentration of chlorine in chlorinated” water is defined herein as the concentration of chlorine that is capable of oxidizing iodide ion to iodine. This concentration is measured by a potassium iodide, sodium thiosulfate titration and is reported as parts per million of active chlorine (Clj). The titration method consists of adding 20 milliliters of a 10% potassium iodide aqueous solution, 10 milliliters of glacial' acetic acid and 5 milliliters of 0.5% starch solution fo 200 milliliters of the chlorinated water to be analyzed and titrating the mixture to a starch/iodine end point with 0.01N sodium thiosulfate.
The invention is further illustrated, but is not intended to be limited, by the following examples in which all percentages are by total weight of the fibers unless otherwise specified. - 9 EXAMPLE I This example illustrates tbe reduction that is obtained in chlorine-induced degradation when a dispersion of zinc oxide particles is present in a spandex yarn made from a po-lyether-based linear segmented polyurethane.
A solution of segmented polyurethane in Ν,Ν-dimethylacetamide was prepared in accordance with the general procedure described in U.S. Patent 3,428,711 (e.g., first sentence of Example II and the description 6f Example I). An intimate mixture was prepared of p,p'-methylenediphenyl di isocyanate and polytetramethylene ether glycol (of about 1800 molecular weight) in a molar ratio of 1.70 and was held at 80 to 90aC for 90 to 100 minutes to yield an isocyanate-terminated polyether (i.e., a capped glycol), which was then cooled to 60 aC and mixed with Ν,Ν-dimethylacetamide to provide a mixture containing about 45% solids. Then, while maintaining vigorous mixing, the capped glycol was reacted for 2 to 3 minutes at a temperature of about 75aC with diethylamine and an 80/20 molar ratio of ethylenediamine and 1,3-cyclohexylenediamine chain extenders. The molar ratio of diamine chain extender to diethylamine was 6.31 and the molar ratio of diamine chain extenders to unreacted isocyanate in the capped glycol was 0.948. The.resultant soluton of segmented polyurethane contained approximately 36% solids and has a viscosity of about 2100 poises at 40 aC. This polymer had an intrinsic viscosity of 0.95, measured at 25aC in Ν,Ν-dimethylacetamide at a concentration of 0.5 gram per 100 ml of soluton.
To the resultant viscous polymer solution were added titanium dioxide, a copolymer of diisopropylaminoethyl methacrylate and n-decyl - 10 methacrylate (in a 70/30 weight ratio), 1,1-bis (3-t-butyl-6-methyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)butane, and ultramarine blue pigment (sold by Reckitts, Ltd.·, North Humberside, England) in addition to the amounts 5 of zinc oxide indicated in the table below, such that these additives respectively amounted to 4.7, 4.7, 1.0, and 0.01% based on the weight of the final fibers. The zinc oxide (St. Joe20, manufactured by St, Joe Zinc Company) had a purity of 99.4% ZnO, a sulfur content of 185 ppm and an average particle size of 0.4 micron.
The polymer solution was dry spun in a conventional manner through orifices to form coalesced 4-filament, 40-denier yarns. These yarns were then subjected to a simulated finishing treatment during which the yarns (usually a 20-cm. sample) were immersed for 30 minutes at atmospheric pressure in 3 liters of 85 to 96°C water which contained 4.5 grams of tetrasodium pyrophosphate and 4.5 grams of Duponol EP (a detergent mainly consisting of diethanolamine lauryl sulfate, sold by Ε. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company of Wilmington, Delaware) .
The finished yarns, designated as yarns a through g, were then subjected to the chlorinated-water exposure test. The results of the exposure to the chlorinated water are summarized in the Table below.
Note that yarn a and yarn b, which were comparison yarns and contained zero and 0.26% zinc oxide, respectively, were severely degraded in physical properties within a very short time. For example, in 24 hours of exposure to the chlorinated water, these two yarns were degraded to less than 10% of their initial toughness and in 72 hours, to 2% or less. In contrast, after 24 hours exposure, yarn ”c of this invention, which contained 0.7% zinc oxide, - 11 retained more than 30% of its initial toughness and yarn d of this invention which contained 1.3% zinc oxide, retained more than 80% of its toughness.
Yarns e, f, and g, which respectively contained 1.5, 2.1 and 2.7% zinc oxide also demonstrated strong resistance to clorine-induced degradation·. Thus, the data in the table show that these yarns of the invention having zinc oxide contents in the preferred range of 1 to 3%, retain 8 to 10 times as much of their initial toughness after 24 hours of exposure to chlorinated water and about 40 times as much of their initial toughness after 72 hours of exposure as do such polyether-based spandex fibers in which no zinc oxide or ineffective amounts of zinc oxide are present.
EXAMPLE II This example illustrates the reduction that is obtained in chlorine-induced degradation when a dispersion of zinc oxide particles is present in a spandex yarn made from a polyester-based linear segmented polyurethane.
A hydroxy-terminated polyester of about 3400 molecular weight was formed.by reaction of 17.3 parts of ethylene glycol and 14.9 parts of butanediol with 87.8 parts of adipic acid. An isocyanate-terminated polyester was then formed by reacting at 80”C, 100 parts of the hydroxy-terminated polyester with 13.0 parts of p,p'-methylenediphenyl di isocyanate. The isocyanate-terminated polyester was then dissolved in 163.2 parts of Ν,Ν-dimethylacetamide and reacted with 1.30 parts ethylenediamine and 0.19 parts of diethylamine dissolved in an additional 54.6 parts of Ν,Ν-dimethyacetamide. The resultant polymer solution was blended with (a) the polyurethane formed as described in U.S Patent Specification No. 3,555,115 by the reaction of - 12 t-butyldiethanolaraine and methylene-bis-(4cyclohexylisocyanate) and (b) the condensation polymer from p-cresol and divinylbenzene, as described ir» U.S. Patent 3,553,290, which additives respectively amounted to 1.0 and 0.5 by weight of the final fibers that were produced by spinning. The thusly prepared polymer solution was dry spun in the conventional manner through orifices to form a coalesced four-filament, 40-denier yarn (yarn h).
A second yarn (yarn i) was prepared in the same way . as yarn h, except that zinc oxide par-ticles of about 1 nicron average size .manufactured by Ilallinckrodt and having a purity of 99.7% ZnO and a sulphur content of 24 ppm were blended into the polymer solution prior to spinning. The zinc oxide content of yarni was 1.1%.
Yarns h and i were then finished as in Example I. The yarns were then subjected to the ’chlorinated-water exposure test. The results are shown in the Table below. Note that yarn i, which contained 1.1% zinc oxide, is much superior to yarn h“ (which contained no zinc oxide) in its ability to resist chlorine-induced degradation. - 13 TABLE Effects of Exposure to Chlorinated Water On Yarn Properties ** « of Sam- ple, % ZnO Exposure Elonga- Tenacity* Tough- Initial ness % qpd .1“ Tough- ness Hours tion, % 2E2 a 0 • 0 560 1.10 610 100 24 340 0.15 50 8 72 150 0.05 8 1 b 0.26 0 520 0.85 440 100 24 270 0.15 *40 9 72 170 0.07 10 2 c 0.70 0 550 1.04 580 100 24 440 0.42 190 34 72 290 0.14 40 7 d 1.3 0 440 0.92 410 100 24 430 0.79 340 83 72 470 0.73 340 83 e 1.5 0 510 0.86 440 100 '24 460 0.85 400 91 72 460 0.74 340 77 f 2.1 0 460 1.01 460 100 24 430 0.82 350 76 72 450 0.77 340 74 9 2.7 0 570 0.98 560 100 24 470 1.02 480 86 72 450 0.80 360 64 h 0 0 760 0.55 420 100 24 700 0.31 220 52 72 610 0.15 90 21 i 1.1 0 810 0.49 400 100 24 750 0.45 340 85 72 750 0.41 310 77 * Tenacity is in grams per denier (gpd) ** Toughness is grams per denier tenacity multiplied by % elongation, (gpd.%). - 14 As many different embodiments of this invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, it is to be understood that this invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments described herein, except as defined in the appended claims.

Claims (18)

1. A spandex fiber in which, for increasinci the resistance of the fiber to chlorine-induced degradation, the fiber contains an effective amount of finely divided zinc oxide having a purity of at least 99.41.
2. A fiber in accordance with claim 1 wherein the zinc oxide has a sulfur content of no more than 0.025%.
3. A fiber in accordance with claim 2 wherein the zinc oxide has a purity of at least 99.7% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.005%.
4. A fiber in accordance with any one of the preceding claims wherein the zinc oxide concentration is in the range of 1/2 to 10 percent by weight of the fiber.
5. A fiber in accordance with claim 4 wherein the zinc oxide concentration is in the range of 1 to 3 percent by weight of the fiber.
6. A fiber in accordance with any one of the preceding claims wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 5 microns.
7. A fiber in accordance with claim,6’wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron.
8. A fiber in accordance with claim 1 substantially as herein described in Example 1 or Example II.
9. A process for preparing a spandex fiber, wherein a long chain synthetic polymer comprising at least 85% segmented polyurethane is dissolved in an organic solvent and the thusly formed polymer solution is then dry spun through orifices into fiber, in which an effective amount of high purity'zinc oxide particles is dispersed within the fiber. -Ιδιο. A process in accordance with claim 9 wherein the concentration of zinc oxide particles is in the range of 1/2 to
10. Percent by weight of the fiber.
11. A process in accordance with claim 10 wherein the 5 concentration of zinc oxide particles is in the range of 1 to 3 percent by weight of the fiber.
12. A process in accordance with any one of claims.9 to 11wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 5 microns. 10
13. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 12 wherein the zinc oxide particles have a purity of at least 99.4% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.025%.
14. A process in accordance with claim 13 wherein the zinc oxide particles have a purity of at least 99.7% and a sulfur content of no more than 0.005%.
15. A process in accordance with claim 12 wherein the mean size of the zinc oxide particles is in the range of 0.1 to 1 micron.
16. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 20 is wherein the zinc oxide particles are added to a mixture of other additives and then injected into the polymer solution upstream of the orifices.
17. A process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 15 wherein a slurry of zinc oxide particles is formed in a 25 compatible medium and then added to the polymer solution upstream of the orifices.
18. A process for preparing a spandex fiber in accordance with claim 1 substantially as herein described in Example 1 or Example II. 30 ig. a spandex fiber when prepared by a process in accordance with any one of claims 9 to 18.
IE1360/81A 1980-06-20 1981-06-19 Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers IE51118B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16160680A 1980-06-20 1980-06-20

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
IE811360L IE811360L (en) 1981-12-20
IE51118B1 true IE51118B1 (en) 1986-10-01

Family

ID=22581895

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
IE1360/81A IE51118B1 (en) 1980-06-20 1981-06-19 Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers

Country Status (16)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS6043444B2 (en)
KR (1) KR840001630B1 (en)
AR (1) AR223928A1 (en)
BR (1) BR8103820A (en)
CA (1) CA1166379A (en)
CH (1) CH646733A5 (en)
DE (1) DE3124197C2 (en)
ES (1) ES8300885A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2485043A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2080349B (en)
HK (1) HK38384A (en)
IE (1) IE51118B1 (en)
IT (1) IT1136846B (en)
MX (1) MX161236A (en)
NL (1) NL188533C (en)
SG (1) SG4084G (en)

Families Citing this family (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5959912A (en) * 1982-09-22 1984-04-05 Toyobo Co Ltd Polyurethane elastomer yarn and its preparation
JPS59150142A (en) * 1983-02-15 1984-08-28 東洋紡績株式会社 Knitted fabric for swimming suit
JPS646143U (en) * 1987-06-29 1989-01-13
US4810737A (en) * 1987-11-16 1989-03-07 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Spinning of spandex filaments
CN1065295C (en) * 1996-09-24 2001-05-02 烟台氨纶股份有限公司 Method for manufacturing chlorine-resistant spandex fiber
CN1089821C (en) * 1997-02-13 2002-08-28 旭化成株式会社 Elastic polyurethane fiber and process for producing same
US6406788B1 (en) 1998-08-10 2002-06-18 Asahi Kasei Kabushiki Kaisha Elastic polyurethane fiber
DE60135769D1 (en) 2000-07-24 2008-10-23 Kyowa Chem Ind Co Ltd LIQUID RAW MATERIAL FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF SHAPED POLYURETHANES OR AROMATIC POLYAMIDES AND USES THEREOF
KR100438005B1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2004-06-30 주식회사 두본 Method for producing chlorine-resistant polyurethane elastic fiber and the fiber
JPWO2006062052A1 (en) * 2004-12-06 2008-06-12 旭化成せんい株式会社 Stretch woven fabric
KR101166807B1 (en) 2008-10-28 2012-07-26 태광산업주식회사 High heat and chlorine resistant polyurethaneurea elastic fiber and preparation of thereof
JP5688601B2 (en) 2011-06-23 2015-03-25 東レ・オペロンテックス株式会社 Polyurethane yarn and fabric and swimsuit using the same

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL213342A (en) * 1955-12-29
FR1182890A (en) * 1956-11-26 1959-06-30 Us Rubber Co Preservation of polyester-urethane polymers
US3386942A (en) * 1964-06-29 1968-06-04 Eastman Kodak Co Stabilization of non-yellowing segmented polyurethane copolymers of polymeric diols, functionally aliphatic diisocyanates and functionally aliphatic diamines
GB1078317A (en) * 1964-09-18 1967-08-09 Bayer Ag Polyurethane materials
FR1469613A (en) * 1966-01-06 1967-02-17 Rhone Poulenc Sa Process for stabilizing polyurethane polyureas
US3743708A (en) * 1970-11-20 1973-07-03 American Cyanamid Co Submicron metal oxide particles and their process for manufacture
US3994881A (en) * 1975-07-24 1976-11-30 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Spandex process and product based on tetra-halogenated diisocyanates and diamines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2080349B (en) 1983-10-26
JPS6043444B2 (en) 1985-09-28
AR223928A1 (en) 1981-09-30
ES503163A0 (en) 1982-11-01
DE3124197A1 (en) 1982-02-25
NL8102970A (en) 1982-01-18
SG4084G (en) 1985-02-15
KR840001630B1 (en) 1984-10-12
BR8103820A (en) 1982-03-09
DE3124197C2 (en) 1990-01-04
IE811360L (en) 1981-12-20
JPS5729609A (en) 1982-02-17
ES8300885A1 (en) 1982-11-01
FR2485043B1 (en) 1984-08-10
MX161236A (en) 1990-08-24
NL188533B (en) 1992-02-17
IT8122474A0 (en) 1981-06-19
CH646733A5 (en) 1984-12-14
IT1136846B (en) 1986-09-03
CA1166379A (en) 1984-04-24
HK38384A (en) 1984-05-11
GB2080349A (en) 1982-02-03
KR830006489A (en) 1983-09-24
FR2485043A1 (en) 1981-12-24
NL188533C (en) 1992-07-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4340527A (en) Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers
CA1166379A (en) Chlorine-resistant spandex fibers
KR970009334B1 (en) Polyurethane composition
JPS5959912A (en) Polyurethane elastomer yarn and its preparation
JP2887402B2 (en) Polyurethane composition
US3133036A (en) Polyurethane fibers containing a colorless leuco derivative of a blue-violet dye
DE69412824T2 (en) SPANDEX CONTAINING BARIUM SULFATE
DE3879457T2 (en) SPANDEX, MADE WITH A DIAMINE BLEND.
EP0041833B1 (en) Acrylic fiber having improved basic dyeability and process therefor
DE69400617T2 (en) SULFONED POLY TEXTILE FIBERS (P-PHENYLENE TEREPHTALAMIDE)
US2719834A (en) Fiber-forming polymers
Geleji et al. Properties of polypropylene fibers made from polymer homologue mixtures
KR0124963B1 (en) Manufacturing method of color resistant polyurethane elastic fiber
JP2000282328A (en) Polyurethane elastic fiber
JPH11323662A (en) Polyurethane elastic fiber
EP0125574A2 (en) Flame-retardant acrylic fibers and process for preparing same
US6372834B1 (en) Stabilized spandex
EP1820890A1 (en) Stretch woven fabric
JP2000198979A (en) Chlorine deterioration inhibitor and polyurethane composition
KR930011337B1 (en) Process for preparation of unfading polyurethane fiber
Furman Electroanalytical Separations in Ammoniacal Fluoride Solutions
EP1155173A1 (en) Stabilized spandex
JPH09268432A (en) High color-forming polyester multifilament yarn for twisted splitting
JPS62184109A (en) matte synthetic fiber
JPH0444013B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Patent lapsed