JPH02236776A - Natural sentence meaning analysis processor - Google Patents

Natural sentence meaning analysis processor

Info

Publication number
JPH02236776A
JPH02236776A JP1058952A JP5895289A JPH02236776A JP H02236776 A JPH02236776 A JP H02236776A JP 1058952 A JP1058952 A JP 1058952A JP 5895289 A JP5895289 A JP 5895289A JP H02236776 A JPH02236776 A JP H02236776A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sentence
semantic
adjunct
expression model
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP1058952A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroshi Matsuo
比呂志 松尾
Yoshiji Oyama
芳史 大山
Tsuneaki Kato
加藤 恒昭
Masaru Nakagawa
優 中川
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NTT Inc
Original Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp filed Critical Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Priority to JP1058952A priority Critical patent/JPH02236776A/en
Publication of JPH02236776A publication Critical patent/JPH02236776A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Machine Translation (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To absorb the error of a case postpositional particle, etc., by replacing an adjunct where there is the error with the adjunct specified by a meaning expression model and executing analysis even when there is the error in the adjunct such as the case postpositional particle in an input sentence. CONSTITUTION:In a morphenic analyzing means 2, the input sentence is divided into words and the respective words are classified to the adjuncts and independent words. In a meaning expression model collating means 3, at first, it is decided to which concept on a meaning expression model 1 the respective independent word belong and it is decided whether the word corresponding to the concept is connected by using the adjunct specified on the meaning expression model or not. Accordingly, the error of the adjunct is detected. When there is the error in the adjunct, the adjunct in the input sentence is replaced with the adjunct specified on the meaning expression model by a relation error correcting means 4 and meaning structure to the replaced sentence is generated by a meaning structure generating means 5. Thus, even when there is the error in the adjunct such as the case postpositional particle, etc., in the input sentence, the meaning structure of the sentence where the error is corrected can be outputted.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 「産業上の利用分野」 この発明は、人力装置から読み込まれた自然文の意味を
解析し、後段に接続される応答処理装置等で処理可能な
意味構造を出力する意味解析処理装置に関する. 「従来の技術」 従来の意味解析処理装置として、辞書や文法規則や分野
依存知識を用いて、形態素解析や構文解析を行い、生成
された係受け関係とあらかじめ規定されたルールに基づ
いて意味構造に変換することによって、意味解析処理を
行う意味解析処理装置が知られている. 「発明が解決しようとする課題」 従来の意味解析処理装置では、入力文に格助詞誤りなど
がある場合には文法規則を満たさないため、係受け関係
を得ることができず解析に失敗する.しかし、一般のユ
ーザは意味解析処理装置で規定された文法規則を知らな
いため、格助詞誤りを含む文を入力することが少なくな
い。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] "Industrial Application Field" This invention analyzes the meaning of natural sentences read from a human-powered device and outputs a semantic structure that can be processed by a response processing device etc. connected at a later stage. Concerning semantic analysis processing equipment. "Conventional technology" Conventional semantic analysis processing devices perform morphological and syntactic analysis using dictionaries, grammar rules, and field-dependent knowledge, and generate semantic structures based on the generated dependency relationships and predefined rules. A semantic analysis processing device is known that performs semantic analysis processing by converting . ``Problems to be solved by the invention'' In conventional semantic analysis processing devices, if the input sentence contains a case particle error, the grammar rules are not satisfied, and the dependency relationship cannot be obtained and the analysis fails. However, since ordinary users do not know the grammatical rules defined by the semantic analysis processing device, they often input sentences containing case particle errors.

このため、従来の意味解析処理装置を用いて計算機との
対話処理システムを構成した場合には、格助詞誤りがあ
る文が入力されるたびに、円滑な対話の流れを妨げると
いう問題があった。
For this reason, when a dialogue processing system with a computer is configured using a conventional semantic analysis processing device, there is a problem that the smooth flow of dialogue is disrupted every time a sentence with a case particle error is input. .

この発明の目的は、入力文中に格助詞などの付属語の誤
りがあっても、誤りがある付属語を意味表現モデルで規
定した付属語に置き換えて解析することにより、格助詞
などの誤りを吸収できる意味解析処理装置を提供するこ
とにある.「課題を解決するための手段および作用」こ
の発明による意味解析処理装置は、 人力の対象となる世界の概念とその概念間の関係を定議
し、概念間の関係を示す付属語を規定した意味表現モデ
ルを有し、 形態素解析手段によって、入力文を単語に分割し、付属
語と自立語とに分類し、その自立語に分類された単語が
意味表現モデル上のどの概念に属するかを判定し、意味
表現モデル照合手段によって、その概念に対応する単語
が意味表現モデル上で規定された付属語を用いて接続さ
れているか否かを判定することによって、付属語の誤り
を検出し、 付属語の誤りがある場合には、係受け誤り訂正手段によ
って、入力文中の付属語を意味表現モデル上で規定され
た付属語と置き換え、置き換えられた文に対する意味構
造を意味構造生成手段で生成することにより、入力文中
に格助詞などの付属語の誤りがあっても、誤りを訂正し
た文の意味構造を出力できることを特徴とする.「実施
例」 第1図はこの発明の実施例を示すブロック図である.第
1図において、1は意味表現モデル、2は形態素解析手
段、3は意味表現モデル照合手段、4は係受け誤り訂正
手段、5は意味構造生成手段である.第2図は意味表現
モデルの構成例である。第2図において、オブジェクト
クラス、イベントクラス、バリュークラスは概念を表し
、矢印はこれら概念の関係を表している.界下第1図を
用いて、この発明の動作を説明する。
The purpose of this invention is to replace errors in adjuncts such as case particles in an input sentence by replacing the erroneous adjuncts with adjuncts defined by a semantic representation model, thereby eliminating errors in case particles and other adjuncts. The purpose is to provide a semantic analysis processing device that can absorb information. ``Means and operations for solving the problem'' The semantic analysis processing device according to the present invention defines the concepts of the world that are subject to human power and the relationships between the concepts, and defines auxiliary words that indicate the relationships between the concepts. It has a semantic representation model, uses morphological analysis means to divide the input sentence into words, classifies them into attached words and independent words, and determines which concept on the semantic representation model the words classified as independent words belong to. and detecting an error in the attached word by determining whether the word corresponding to the concept is connected using the attached word defined on the semantic expression model by the semantic expression model matching means, If there is an error in the attached word, the attached word in the input sentence is replaced by the attached word specified on the semantic expression model by the dependency error correction means, and the semantic structure for the replaced sentence is generated by the semantic structure generation means. By doing this, even if there are errors in attached words such as case particles in the input sentence, the semantic structure of the sentence with the errors corrected can be output. "Embodiment" Figure 1 is a block diagram showing an embodiment of this invention. In FIG. 1, 1 is a semantic expression model, 2 is a morphological analysis means, 3 is a semantic expression model matching means, 4 is a dependency error correction means, and 5 is a semantic structure generation means. FIG. 2 shows an example of the structure of a semantic expression model. In Figure 2, the object class, event class, and value class represent concepts, and the arrows represent the relationships between these concepts. The operation of the present invention will be explained using FIG.

入力文は形態素解析手段2に入力される.形態素解析手
段2では、入力文を単語に分割し、各単語を付属語と自
立語に分頻する。例えば、[冨士屋旅館へ泊まりたい.
」が入力されたとする.自立語として「富士屋旅館」お
よび「泊まる」が抽出される。
The input sentence is input to the morphological analysis means 2. The morphological analysis means 2 divides the input sentence into words, and divides each word into an adjunct word and an independent word. For example, [I want to stay at Fujiya Ryokan.]
” is input. "Fujiya Ryokan" and "stay" are extracted as independent words.

意味表現モデル照合手段3では、まず、各自立語が意味
表現モデル1上のどの概念に属するかを判定する.「冨
士屋旅館」は“宿名゜゛という概念、「泊まる」は“泊
まる゜゛という概念に属している.第2図の意味表現モ
デル1では、isa関係や名前関係によって上位概念が
規定されている.例えば、“宿名”の上位概念として“
宿゜゛が規定されているため、「冨士屋旅館」は“宿”
という概念に属する。意味表現モデルlでは、゜゜宿”
と“泊まる”の関係は付属語「に」によって関係付けら
れているのに対して、入力文では「富士屋旅館」と「泊
まる」は「へ」で接続されている.このため、「へ」は
誤りと判断され、この結果が係受け誤り訂正千段4に送
られる. 係受け誤り訂正手段4では、誤りと判定された付属語を
意味表現モデルl上で規定された付属語で置き換える。
The semantic expression model matching means 3 first determines which concept on the semantic expression model 1 each independent word belongs to. “Fujiya Ryokan” belongs to the concept of “inn name゜゛゛,” and “staying” belongs to the concept of “staying゜゛.” In semantic expression model 1 in Figure 2, superordinate concepts are defined by isa relationships and name relationships. .For example, as a superordinate concept of “inn name”
Because accommodation is stipulated, “Fujiya Ryokan” is an “inn”.
It belongs to the concept of In the semantic representation model l, ゜゜ inn
The relationship between "Fujiya Ryokan" and "stay" are connected by the adjunct "ni", whereas in the input sentence "Fujiya Ryokan" and "stay" are connected by "he". Therefore, "he" is determined to be an error, and this result is sent to the 4th stage for error correction. The dependency error correction means 4 replaces the attached word determined to be an error with the attached word defined on the semantic expression model l.

すなわち、「へ」が「に」に置き換えられて、「富士屋
旅館に泊まりたい.」という文が生成され、意味構造生
成手段5に送られる. 意味構造生成手段5では、「富士屋旅館に泊まりたい.
」という文に対して、意味構造を生成する.係受け誤り
訂正手段4で訂正された文は、意味表現モデルlで規定
された関係を満たすだめに、正しい意味構造を出力する
ことができる. 「発明の効果」 以上説明したように、この発明によれば入力文中に格助
詞などの付属語の誤りがあっても、誤りがある付属語を
意味表現モデルで規定した付属語に置き換えて解析する
ことができるため、付属語の誤りがある文が入力されて
も、円滑な対話の流れを維持できる対話処理システムを
実現できる。
That is, "he" is replaced with "ni", and the sentence "I want to stay at Fujiya Inn." is generated and sent to the semantic structure generation means 5. In the semantic structure generation means 5, "I want to stay at Fujiya Ryokan.
A semantic structure is generated for the sentence ``. The sentence corrected by the dependency error correction means 4 can output a correct semantic structure as long as it satisfies the relationship defined by the semantic expression model l. "Effects of the Invention" As explained above, according to the present invention, even if there is an error in an adjunct such as a case particle in an input sentence, the incorrect adjunct is replaced with an adjunct defined by the semantic representation model and analyzed. Therefore, it is possible to realize a dialogue processing system that can maintain a smooth flow of dialogue even if a sentence with an erroneous adjunct is input.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図はこの発明の実施例の構成を示すブロック図、第
2図は意味表現モデルの構成例を示す図である。 特許出願人  日本電信電話株式会社
FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of a semantic expression model. Patent applicant Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] (1)入力文を入力する手段と前記入力文の意味解析結
果を出力する手段とを有する自然文意味解析処理装置に
おいて、 入力の対象となる世界の概念とその概念間の関係を定義
し、概念間の関係を示す付属語を規定した意味表現モデ
ルと、 前記入力文を単語に分割し、付属語と自立語とに分類す
る形態素解析手段と、 その自立語に分類された単語が前記意味表現モデル上の
どの概念に属するかを判定し、その単語間を接続してい
る入力文中の付属語が前記意味表現モデル上の前記概念
間を関係付ける付属語であるか否かを判定する意味表現
モデル照合手段と、 前記意味表現モデル照合手段の判定結果が否である場合
に、前記入力文中の付属語を、その概念間に対して前記
意味表現モデル上で規定された付属語と置き換えた文を
生成する係受け誤り訂正手段と、 前記意味表現モデル照合手段で否と判定されなかった文
および前記係受け誤り訂正手段で訂正された文に対して
意味構造を生成する意味構造生成手段とを有することを
特徴とする自然文意味解析処理装置。
(1) In a natural sentence semantic analysis processing device having means for inputting an input sentence and means for outputting a result of semantic analysis of the input sentence, defining concepts of the world to be input and relationships between the concepts; a meaning expression model that defines attached words that indicate relationships between concepts; a morphological analysis means that divides the input sentence into words and classifies them into attached words and independent words; The meaning of determining which concept on the expression model the word belongs to, and determining whether the adjunct word in the input sentence that connects the words is an adjunct word that relates the concepts on the semantic expression model. expression model matching means, and when the judgment result of the semantic expression model matching means is negative, replacing the attached word in the input sentence with the attached word defined on the semantic expression model between the concepts; a dependency error correction unit that generates a sentence; and a semantic structure generation unit that generates a semantic structure for a sentence that is not determined to be negative by the semantic representation model matching unit and a sentence that is corrected by the dependency error correction unit. A natural sentence semantic analysis processing device comprising:
JP1058952A 1989-03-10 1989-03-10 Natural sentence meaning analysis processor Pending JPH02236776A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1058952A JPH02236776A (en) 1989-03-10 1989-03-10 Natural sentence meaning analysis processor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1058952A JPH02236776A (en) 1989-03-10 1989-03-10 Natural sentence meaning analysis processor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH02236776A true JPH02236776A (en) 1990-09-19

Family

ID=13099169

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1058952A Pending JPH02236776A (en) 1989-03-10 1989-03-10 Natural sentence meaning analysis processor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH02236776A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014109954A (en) * 2012-12-03 2014-06-12 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Case particle identification device, method, and program

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014109954A (en) * 2012-12-03 2014-06-12 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Case particle identification device, method, and program

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Qian et al. Exploiting constituent dependencies for tree kernel-based semantic relation extraction
Qi et al. Arc-swift: A novel transition system for dependency parsing
JPH0261763A (en) Mechanical translation equipment
Asano et al. Detecting bad smells of refinement in goal-oriented requirements analysis
JPH02236776A (en) Natural sentence meaning analysis processor
Arwidarasti et al. Converting an Indonesian constituency treebank to the Penn treebank format
JP2606056B2 (en) Knowledge base construction method
Bunt Annotations that effectively contribute to semantic interpretation
JP2001297100A (en) Device for supporting refining of keyword extraction rule
Yellin et al. Paths to relation extraction through semantic structure
JP3113257B2 (en) Machine translation equipment
Khatun et al. An emperical framework of idioms translator from bengali to english: Rule based approach
JPH0449432A (en) Syntax error analyzing system
JP3050575B2 (en) Natural language automatic translator
JPH06282566A (en) Information processor
JP2555921B2 (en) Word processor with translation conversion function
Bhattacharjee et al. Context-Aware Token Skipping for Robust Chain-of-Thought Compression
JP2901977B2 (en) Translation equipment
JPH06236394A (en) Automatic natural language translator
CN120954406A (en) Voice interaction methods, devices, and electronic devices based on multi-model dynamic mutual verification
Dash et al. POSIT: Simultaneously Tagging Natural and Programming Languages
Yli-Jyrä Constraint Grammar is a hand-crafted Transformer
JPH0421167A (en) machine translation device
JPS6386071A (en) Translation system for natural language
JPS62219165A (en) Processing system for equivalent selection in machine translation