JPH0225165Y2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0225165Y2 JPH0225165Y2 JP13430883U JP13430883U JPH0225165Y2 JP H0225165 Y2 JPH0225165 Y2 JP H0225165Y2 JP 13430883 U JP13430883 U JP 13430883U JP 13430883 U JP13430883 U JP 13430883U JP H0225165 Y2 JPH0225165 Y2 JP H0225165Y2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- electrode
- rectangular
- vibrator
- rectangular vibrator
- ultrasonic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 17
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000002902 bimodal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Piezo-Electric Transducers For Audible Bands (AREA)
- Transducers For Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Description
〔発明の技術分野〕
この考案は鋼管や丸棒などの表面や内質部に存
在する欠陥を超音波を用いて非破壊的に検査する
のに用いる超音波探触子に関するものである。
〔従来の技術〕
従来の超音波探触子について第1図a,bを用
いて説明する。
第1図aは従来の超音波探触子の断面図と探傷
距離に対応した超音波ビームパター図である。第
1図bは従来の超音波探触子に使用された矩形振
動子の図である。
第1図a,bにおいて1は従来の矩形振動子、
2は矩形振動子1の振動を抑制し不要超音波を吸
収するダンパー、3は矩形振動子1の被検材12
と対向する面に設けられた整合層、4は矩形振動
子1やダンパー2等を収納するケース、5はほぼ
0.3X0の距離で見られる超音波ビームパターン図、
6はほぼ0.5X0の距離で見られる超音波ビームパ
ターン図、7はほぼ0.7X0の距離で見られる超音
波ビームパターン図、8はほぼX0の距離で見ら
れる超音波ビームパターン図、9は近距離音場で
見られる位相干渉による超音波ビームパターンの
凹凸差、10は有効ビーム幅、11は有効ビーム
幅10を規定するための超音波の音圧の最大値か
らの低下量、12は被検材、13は従来の矩形振
動子1のダンパー2側の電極形状、14は従来の
矩形振動子1の被検材12と対向する面の電極形
状、Aは矩形振動子1の長辺の長さである。
超音波自動接傷装置においては超音波探触子の
持つ有効ビーム幅10を欠陥検出能で許容できる
範囲において広く確保し、超音波探触子の数を減
らそうと考えるのが常である。又、探傷距離が広
範囲にわたつても一種類の超音波探触子を使う事
が多い。従つてほとんどが近距離音場内は、又は
近距離音場から遠距離音場にまたがつた領域で使
用される。
ここで近距離音場限界距離X0は(1)式で与えら
れる。
X0=A2/4λ …(1)
A=振動子の長辺の寸法
λ=波長(mm)
つまり有効ビーム幅10を広く確保するために
は振動子1の長さAを大きくする必要があり、長
さAを大きくすると(1)式より近距離音場限界距離
X0が長くなる。
さらにこの近距離音場の領域内では被検材12
中の反射体(欠陥)の形状が小さく点反射源の場
合に著しく現われる現象で、深さ距離が同じでも
矩形振動子1の場所によつて受信感度が変化しビ
ームパターン図に凹凸9が生じる。この凹凸差9
は大きい所で6〜8dBも生じるため、常に最大値
を捕えるかどうかわからない自動探傷装置では欠
陥を見落としたり、再現性が悪くなつたりするの
で大きな問題となる。
一般的なビームパターン図は0.5X0より近い距
離では多峰特性のパターン5となり0.5X0で双峰
特性のパターン6となり、0.7X0付近で単峰特性
のパターン7となり、X0において最も鈍い単峰
特性のパターン8を示す。
上記ビームパターンの凹凸差9の原因は矩形振
動子1の端部と中央部から発生する超音波の位相
干渉によるものである。従来の超音波探触子の矩
形振動子1の電極13,14は全面にあるために
矩形振動子1はピストン運動を行ない、端部と中
央部から発生する超音波の音圧は等しくなり、従
つて位相干渉も生じやすくなる欠点があつた。
〔考案の概要〕
この考案はこの様な従来の欠点を改善する目的
でなされたもので矩形振動子の片面の電極の四周
部を除去して八角形の形状とする事によりビーム
パターンの凹凸差を軽減し安定した探傷性能を得
る超音波探触子を提供するものである。
〔考案の実施例〕
以下この考案の一実施例について第2図a,b
を用いて詳述する。
第2図aはこの考案による超音波探触子の断面
図と探傷距離に対応した超音波ビームパターン図
である。第2図bはこの考案の超音波探触子に使
用される矩形振動子の図である。
第2図a,bにおいて1はこの考案による一方
の電極面の形状が八角形から成る矩形振動子、2
はダンパー、3は整合層、4はケース、5はほぼ
0.3X0の距離で見られる超音波ビームパターン図、
6はほぼ0.5X0の距離で見られる超音波ビームパ
ターン図、7はほぼ0.7X0の距離で見られる超音
波ビームパターン図、8はほぼX0の距離で見ら
れる超音波ビームパターン図、、9は近距離音場
で見られる位相干渉による超音波ビームパターン
の凹凸差、10は有効ビーム幅、11は有効ビー
ム幅10を定義するための超音波の最大音圧値か
らの規定の低下量、12は被検材、13はこの考
案による矩形振動子1のダンパー2側の電極形
状、14はこの考案による矩形振動子1の被検材
12との対向面の電極形状、Aは矩形振動子の1
の長辺の長さ、Bは矩形振動子1の短辺の長さ、
Cは矩形振動子1の短辺B長さ方向の端部有効電
極寸法である。Dは長辺A方向に対する電極切断
長さ、θは矩形振動子1の電極13四周部の切断
角度である。
この考案による超音波探触子においては探傷処
理能力上必要な有効ビーム幅10は矩形振動子1
の長辺A寸法に左右され、これを有効に使わせる
ために矩形振動子1の短辺B寸法に対する有効電
極寸法CをB/2以上にする事が大変重要とな
る。又、0.7X0よりもさらに近距離な音場での超
音波ビームパターン5,6の位相干渉による凹凸
差9を軽減させるために矩形振動子1の被検材1
2と対向する面の電極は全面電極とし、他の一方
の面の電極の四周部が矩形振動子1の長辺Aと短
辺Bの長さ、及び、被検材12との対向面に整合
層3だけを有する構造か、楔を有する構造か等の
条件に応じて適当な寸法で除去されているため
に、矩形振動子1の端部で発生する超音波の音圧
が弱くなり、中央部から発生した超音波へ与える
影響が少なくなる。又、矩形振動子1の四周部電
極13が斜めに除去されているため位相も合いに
くくなり、結果的には0.7X0より近距離に見られ
た超音波ビームパターン5,6の凹凸差9は著し
く軽減され、平均的には3dB以内の凹凸差9にす
る事が可能となる。
なお、実験的には電極形状13を長辺をA、短
辺をBとしただ円形にすれば超音波ビームパター
ン5,6の凹凸差9は極めて少なくなるが、有効
ビーム幅10が減少するため、上記有効ビーム幅
10を大幅に減少させないで、かつビームパター
ンの凹凸差9を少なくさせるためには八角形の電
極13が最も有効的であり、四周部の電極13を
除去する目安はおおよそ以下のように考えられる
が、最適な電極形状13は矩形振動子1の長辺A
と短辺Bのそれぞれの長さ比によつて調整するこ
とが望ましい。
D>A/3 …(2)
かつ、65゜<θ<80゜ …(3)
ただし、A>Bの条件の場合である。
すなわち、上記条件のもとで電極13切断線
が、長辺A、短辺Bで表わされるだ円の線に接近
した形状が良い。
参考までに各種電極形状13に対するビームパ
ターンの形状6と凹凸差9の例を表1に示す。
[Technical Field of the Invention] This invention relates to an ultrasonic probe used to non-destructively inspect defects existing on the surface or internal parts of steel pipes, round bars, etc. using ultrasonic waves. [Prior Art] A conventional ultrasonic probe will be explained using FIGS. 1a and 1b. FIG. 1a is a cross-sectional view of a conventional ultrasonic probe and an ultrasonic beam pattern diagram corresponding to the flaw detection distance. FIG. 1b is a diagram of a rectangular transducer used in a conventional ultrasound probe. In Fig. 1a and b, 1 is a conventional rectangular vibrator;
2 is a damper that suppresses the vibration of the rectangular vibrator 1 and absorbs unnecessary ultrasonic waves; 3 is the test material 12 of the rectangular vibrator 1;
4 is a case for storing the rectangular vibrator 1, damper 2, etc., and 5 is a matching layer provided on the opposite surface.
Ultrasonic beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of 0.3X 0 ,
6 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately 0.5X 0 , 7 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately 0.7X 0 , 8 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately X 0 , 9 is the unevenness difference in the ultrasonic beam pattern due to phase interference observed in the near-field sound field, 10 is the effective beam width, 11 is the amount of decrease from the maximum value of the sound pressure of the ultrasound to define the effective beam width 10, 12 is the material to be tested, 13 is the shape of the electrode on the damper 2 side of the conventional rectangular vibrator 1, 14 is the shape of the electrode on the surface of the conventional rectangular vibrator 1 facing the material to be tested 12, and A is the shape of the electrode of the rectangular vibrator 1. This is the length of the long side. In an ultrasonic automatic wound contact device, it is customary to ensure that the effective beam width 10 of the ultrasonic probe is as wide as is allowable for defect detection ability, and to reduce the number of ultrasonic probes. Furthermore, even if the flaw detection distance is wide, one type of ultrasonic probe is often used. Therefore, most of them are used in the near sound field or in the region spanning from the near sound field to the far sound field. Here, the near-field sound field limit distance X 0 is given by equation (1). X 0 = A 2 /4λ...(1) A = Long side dimension of the oscillator λ = Wavelength (mm) In other words, in order to ensure a wide effective beam width 10, the length A of the oscillator 1 must be increased. Yes, if the length A is increased, the near-field sound field limit distance is determined by equation (1).
X 0 becomes longer. Furthermore, within the area of this near-field sound field, the test material 12
This is a phenomenon that occurs significantly when the shape of the reflector (defect) inside is small and it is a point reflection source. Even if the depth and distance are the same, the reception sensitivity changes depending on the location of the rectangular oscillator 1, causing unevenness 9 in the beam pattern diagram. . This unevenness difference 9
This can be as high as 6 to 8 dB in some places, so automatic flaw detection equipment that does not always know whether it will capture the maximum value is a big problem because it can overlook defects or have poor reproducibility. A typical beam pattern diagram shows pattern 5 with multimodal characteristics at a distance closer than 0.5X 0 , pattern 6 with bimodal characteristics at 0.5X 0 , pattern 7 with unimodal characteristics near 0.7X 0 , and maximum at X 0. Pattern 8 with dull unimodal characteristics is shown. The cause of the unevenness 9 in the beam pattern is due to phase interference between the ultrasonic waves generated from the ends and the center of the rectangular vibrator 1. Since the electrodes 13 and 14 of the rectangular transducer 1 of a conventional ultrasound probe are located on the entire surface, the rectangular transducer 1 performs a piston movement, and the sound pressure of the ultrasound generated from the ends and the center becomes equal. Therefore, there is a drawback that phase interference is likely to occur. [Summary of the invention] This invention was made with the aim of improving such conventional drawbacks. By removing the four peripheral parts of the electrode on one side of the rectangular vibrator and making it into an octagonal shape, the difference in unevenness of the beam pattern can be reduced. The purpose of the present invention is to provide an ultrasonic probe that reduces flaw detection and achieves stable flaw detection performance. [Example of the invention] The following is an example of this invention as shown in Figures 2a and b.
The details will be explained using . FIG. 2a is a sectional view of the ultrasonic probe according to this invention and an ultrasonic beam pattern diagram corresponding to the flaw detection distance. FIG. 2b is a diagram of a rectangular vibrator used in the ultrasonic probe of this invention. In Figures 2a and b, 1 is a rectangular vibrator according to this invention in which one electrode surface has an octagonal shape, and 2
is the damper, 3 is the matching layer, 4 is the case, and 5 is approximately
Ultrasonic beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of 0.3X 0 ,
6 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately 0.5X 0 , 7 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately 0.7X 0 , 8 is an ultrasound beam pattern diagram seen at a distance of approximately X 0 , , 9 is the unevenness difference in the ultrasonic beam pattern due to phase interference observed in the near sound field, 10 is the effective beam width, and 11 is the specified drop from the maximum sound pressure value of the ultrasound to define the effective beam width 10. 12 is the material to be tested, 13 is the shape of the electrode on the damper 2 side of the rectangular vibrator 1 according to this invention, 14 is the shape of the electrode on the surface facing the material 12 of the rectangular vibrator 1 according to this invention, and A is the rectangle. vibrator 1
B is the length of the short side of rectangular vibrator 1,
C is the end effective electrode dimension in the length direction of the short side B of the rectangular vibrator 1. D is the cutting length of the electrode in the direction of the long side A, and θ is the cutting angle of the four circumferences of the electrode 13 of the rectangular vibrator 1. In the ultrasonic probe according to this invention, the effective beam width 10 required for flaw detection processing capacity is the rectangular transducer 1.
In order to make effective use of this dimension, it is very important to set the effective electrode dimension C to the short side B dimension of the rectangular vibrator 1 to be B/2 or more. In addition, in order to reduce the unevenness difference 9 due to phase interference between the ultrasonic beam patterns 5 and 6 in a sound field that is closer than 0.7X 0 , the specimen 1 of the rectangular vibrator 1 is
The electrode on the surface facing 2 is a full-surface electrode, and the four circumferential parts of the electrode on the other side are the lengths of the long sides A and short sides B of the rectangular vibrator 1, and the surface facing the test material 12. Since the matching layer 3 is removed in an appropriate size depending on whether the structure has only the matching layer 3 or the structure has a wedge, the sound pressure of the ultrasonic wave generated at the end of the rectangular vibrator 1 is weakened. The influence on the ultrasonic waves generated from the central part is reduced. In addition, since the four circumferential electrodes 13 of the rectangular vibrator 1 are removed diagonally, it becomes difficult to match the phases, and as a result, the unevenness difference 9 between the ultrasonic beam patterns 5 and 6 seen at a closer distance than 0.7X 0 . is significantly reduced, making it possible to reduce the unevenness difference to within 3 dB on average. In addition, experimentally, if the electrode shape 13 is made into an oval shape with the long side A and the short side B, the unevenness difference 9 between the ultrasonic beam patterns 5 and 6 will be extremely reduced, but the effective beam width 10 will be reduced. Therefore, in order to reduce the unevenness difference 9 in the beam pattern without significantly reducing the effective beam width 10, an octagonal electrode 13 is most effective, and the guideline for removing the electrode 13 on the four peripheries is approximately It is thought as follows, but the optimal electrode shape 13 is the long side A of the rectangular vibrator 1.
It is desirable to adjust the length ratio between the short side B and the short side B. D>A/3...(2) and 65°<θ<80°...(3) However, this is the case under the condition of A>B. That is, under the above conditions, it is preferable that the cutting line of the electrode 13 be close to the line of the ellipse represented by the long side A and the short side B. For reference, examples of beam pattern shapes 6 and unevenness differences 9 for various electrode shapes 13 are shown in Table 1.
以上説明した様にこの考案は矩形振動子の被検
材と対向する面の電極は全面電極とし、他の一方
の面の電極形状を四周部を適当な寸法で除去して
八角形とする事により近距離音場領域で生じる超
音波ビームパターンの凹凸差を軽減し、安定した
探傷性能及び、高い再現性を有する超音波探触子
を提供するものである。
As explained above, this idea is based on the fact that the electrodes on the surface of the rectangular vibrator facing the test material are full electrodes, and the shape of the electrodes on the other surface is made into an octagon by removing the four circumferences by appropriate dimensions. This provides an ultrasonic probe with stable flaw detection performance and high reproducibility by reducing unevenness of an ultrasonic beam pattern that occurs in a near-field sound field region.
第1図a,bは従来の超音波探触子の断面図と
ビームパターン図と矩形振動子の図、第2図a,
bはこの考案による超音波探触子の断面図とビー
ムパターン図と矩形振動子の図である。
図において1は矩形振動子、2はダンパー、3
は整合層、4はケース、5,6,7,8は探傷距
離に対応した超音波ビームパターン、9は近距離
音場におけるビームパターンの凹凸差、10は有
効ビーム幅、12は被検材、13は矩形振動子の
ダンパーと対向する電極面、14は矩形振動子の
被検材と対向する電極面、Aは矩形振動子の長辺
寸法、Bは矩形振動子の短辺寸法、Cは矩形振動
子の短辺寸法の端部有効電極寸法、Dは振動子長
辺方向に対する電極切断長さ、θは電極切断角度
である。尚、図中同一あるいは相当部分には同一
符号を付して示してある。
Figures 1a and b are a cross-sectional view, beam pattern diagram, and rectangular transducer of a conventional ultrasonic probe, and Figure 2a,
b is a cross-sectional view, a beam pattern diagram, and a diagram of a rectangular transducer of the ultrasonic probe according to this invention. In the figure, 1 is a rectangular vibrator, 2 is a damper, and 3
is the matching layer, 4 is the case, 5, 6, 7, 8 are the ultrasonic beam patterns corresponding to the flaw detection distance, 9 is the difference in unevenness of the beam pattern in the near field, 10 is the effective beam width, and 12 is the material to be tested , 13 is the electrode surface of the rectangular vibrator facing the damper, 14 is the electrode surface of the rectangular vibrator facing the test material, A is the long side dimension of the rectangular vibrator, B is the short side dimension of the rectangular vibrator, C is the end effective electrode dimension of the short side of the rectangular vibrator, D is the electrode cutting length in the long side direction of the vibrator, and θ is the electrode cutting angle. In the drawings, the same or corresponding parts are designated by the same reference numerals.
Claims (1)
探触子において、上記矩形振動子の被検材と対向
する面の電極形状は全面電極とし、他の面の電極
形状は矩形振動子の四周部を適当な寸法で除去し
た八角形とした事を特徴とする超音波探触子。 In an ultrasonic probe equipped with a rectangular vibrator having a piezoelectric effect, the electrode shape on the surface of the rectangular vibrator facing the test material is a full-surface electrode, and the electrode shape on other surfaces is the four circumferential parts of the rectangular vibrator. An ultrasonic probe characterized by having an octagonal shape obtained by removing the ridges to appropriate dimensions.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP13430883U JPS6041856U (en) | 1983-08-30 | 1983-08-30 | ultrasonic probe |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP13430883U JPS6041856U (en) | 1983-08-30 | 1983-08-30 | ultrasonic probe |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS6041856U JPS6041856U (en) | 1985-03-25 |
| JPH0225165Y2 true JPH0225165Y2 (en) | 1990-07-11 |
Family
ID=30302672
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP13430883U Granted JPS6041856U (en) | 1983-08-30 | 1983-08-30 | ultrasonic probe |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS6041856U (en) |
-
1983
- 1983-08-30 JP JP13430883U patent/JPS6041856U/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS6041856U (en) | 1985-03-25 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN103969341B (en) | The extraordinary probe of Austenitic stainless steel pipe butt girth welding seam ultrasound examination | |
| CN108593779B (en) | A Phased Array Linear Array Probe Wedge with Focusing Properties | |
| CN205920095U (en) | High resolution TOFD detects ultrasonic transducer | |
| CN203758968U (en) | Ultrasonic-detecting special probe for butt-joint ring welding seam of austenite stainless steel tube | |
| JPH1090239A (en) | Beveled probe | |
| JPS6210384B2 (en) | ||
| RU2152140C1 (en) | Piezoelectric cell for band-pass transducer | |
| JPS6110204Y2 (en) | ||
| SU1288590A1 (en) | Piezoelectric transducer for ultrasonic checking | |
| JPH0244209Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH0212609Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH06317571A (en) | Ultrasonic probe | |
| JPS62103568A (en) | Split type vertical probe | |
| RU2159427C2 (en) | Sensitive element for ultrasonic piezoelectric receiving converter | |
| JP2006003150A (en) | Oblique probe and ultrasonic flaw detector | |
| JPS6327748A (en) | Ultrasonic probe | |
| JPH0752180B2 (en) | Ultrasonic testing method | |
| JPS6319795Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH11316216A (en) | Ultrasonic probe | |
| JPH02293661A (en) | Oblique angle probe for low frequency | |
| JP3417856B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method and equipment for cylinders | |
| JPH01162145A (en) | Ultrasonic probe | |
| JP2004251658A (en) | Ultrasonic angle beam probe | |
| JP2007033140A (en) | Ultrasonic probe | |
| RU34794U1 (en) | ACOUSTIC MICROSCOPE HEAD |