JPH0262668B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0262668B2 JPH0262668B2 JP59076566A JP7656684A JPH0262668B2 JP H0262668 B2 JPH0262668 B2 JP H0262668B2 JP 59076566 A JP59076566 A JP 59076566A JP 7656684 A JP7656684 A JP 7656684A JP H0262668 B2 JPH0262668 B2 JP H0262668B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- rod
- seismic isolation
- isolation device
- shaped body
- elastic
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Foundations (AREA)
- Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
Description
この発明は、免震装置に関する。
従来から、原子力発電所の建屋、橋梁の脚部等
の重量構造物の免震装置として各種の提案がなさ
れ、その一部は実用化されている。
この種の免震装置としては、平板状の積層ゴム
を用いたものが周知であるが、以下の欠点があつ
た。
すなわち、入力地震加速度が、例えば0.2g以
上のように大きくなると、構造物の横滑りが発生
し易くなるとともに、弾性体を主体として構成し
ているため、地震エネルギーの吸収を示す履歴曲
線によつて囲まれた面積も小さいという問題があ
つた。
そこで、上記問題を解消し、大きなエネルギー
吸収が得られるように、上記積層ゴムと、地震力
が加わつた際に直ちに塑性変形をする軟質金属、
例えば鉛とを組合わせた免震装置が提案されてい
る。
しかしながら、このような免震装置では、地震
エネルギーの吸収機能は増大されるものの、地震
とは逆に構造物に短周期の振動、例えば強風等が
作用した際に、軟質金属が比較的小さい外力に対
しても塑性変形するために、構造物が予期した以
上に揺れるという問題がある。
この発明は、上述した問題の解決を意図してな
されたものであつて、その目的とするところは、
比較的大きな地震エネルギーの吸収能を備え、且
つ構造物側から加わる外力に対しては適当な剛性
を有するとともに、取付けや取換えが容易な免震
装置を提供するところにある。
上記目的を達成するため、この発明は、鉛直荷
重を支持し水平荷重に対して弾性変形をする弾性
体と、水平荷重に対して所定の弾性変形を経て塑
性変形をする棒状体とを上部構造と基礎構造との
間に併設した免震装置であつて、前記弾性体は、
交互に積層された平板状の弾性材と金属板とを有
し、前記棒状体は軸が鉛直方向に位置させられた
鋼棒からなることを特徴とする。
以下、この発明の好適な実施例について添附図
面を参照して詳細に説明する。
第1図から第4図は、この発明に係る免震装置
の一実施例を示すものである。
免震装置は、建築構造物等の上部構造10と、
基礎構造12の間に介装され、鉛直荷重を支持し
水平荷重に対して弾性変形する弾性体14と、水
平荷重に対して所定の弾性変形を経て、塑性変形
する棒状体16とから構成されている。
上記弾性体14は、ネオプレンゴム等で平板状
に形成された弾性シート14aと、金属でこれと
同じ形状に形成された金属シート14bとを接着
剤を介在させて交互に積層し、この両端に平板状
のエンドプレート14c,14cを取付けて構成
し、各エンドプレート14c,14cは上記上部
構造10と基礎構造12にそれぞれ固定されてい
る。
この弾性体14は、水平荷重Qに対して、概略
第2図に示すような変形σ性状を呈する。
上記棒状体16は、具体的には円形断面の鋼棒
であつて、上部構造10および基礎構造12に対
向して凹所18,18を形成し、この凹所18,
18に棒状体16の上下端を遊嵌している。この
ような遊嵌構造は必ずしも必要でないが、遊嵌構
造を採用すれば、棒状体16の取付けないしは取
換えがさらに一層容易になる。
この棒状体16は、水平荷重Qに対して、概略
第3図に示すように、所定の弾性変形領域Aを経
て降伏点Piに至り、その後は塑性変形領域Bとな
る変形σ性状を呈する。
ここで、降伏点Piは最大水平荷重Qに対して、
その1/4程度となるように設定することが好まし
く、より具体的には、現在想定されている最大級
の地震は、水平変位が約30cm程度と考えられてい
るため、降伏点Piは約7.5cm程度に設定する。
そして、上述した構成の免震装置の水平荷重に
対する変形性状は、第4図の実線で示すような略
平行四辺形状の履歴曲線となる。
つまり、同図に一点鎖線で示す弾性体14の性
状曲線と、点線で示す棒状体16の性状曲線とを
加え合せた性状を免震装置は有することになる。
本発明者らは、上述した免震装置の具体的な縮
小モデルを以下のように設定して振動解析を試み
た。
上記弾性体14として直径が150mmの円板状の
ゴムシートと鋼板とを、約250mmに積層し、弾性
係数が50Kg/cmとなるように設定し、上記棒状体
16として直径13mmで、その長さが約50cmのいわ
ゆるPC鋼棒C種1号と呼ばれる鋼棒を設定し、
上部および基礎構造の10,12の間隔を300mm
に設定した。
なお、上記鋼棒の弾性係数は112Kg/cmであつ
て、降伏点は200Kgの水平荷重で1.8cm変形する点
である。
また、鉛直荷重は5tonとし、これらの各数値は
4〜5階建のコンクリート構造物の約1/40に相当
する。
そして、上記条件の設定から以下の表1に示す
解析結果を得た。
The present invention relates to a seismic isolation device. Conventionally, various proposals have been made as seismic isolation devices for heavy structures such as nuclear power plant buildings and bridge legs, and some of them have been put into practical use. As this type of seismic isolation device, one using flat laminated rubber is well known, but it has the following drawbacks. In other words, when the input seismic acceleration becomes large, for example 0.2 g or more, the structure is more likely to skid, and since it is mainly composed of elastic bodies, the hysteresis curve showing the absorption of seismic energy There was also a problem that the enclosed area was small. Therefore, in order to solve the above problem and obtain large energy absorption, we used the above laminated rubber and a soft metal that plastically deforms immediately when earthquake force is applied.
For example, a seismic isolation device combining lead with lead has been proposed. However, although such seismic isolation devices increase the ability to absorb seismic energy, when short-period vibrations such as strong winds act on a structure, contrary to an earthquake, the soft metal absorbs a relatively small external force. There is also the problem that the structure sways more than expected due to plastic deformation. This invention was made with the intention of solving the above-mentioned problems, and its purpose is to:
The object of the present invention is to provide a seismic isolation device that has a relatively large ability to absorb earthquake energy, has appropriate rigidity against external forces applied from the structure side, and is easy to install and replace. In order to achieve the above object, the present invention provides an upper structure in which an elastic body that supports a vertical load and deforms elastically in response to a horizontal load, and a rod-shaped body that deforms plastically through a predetermined elastic deformation in response to a horizontal load. A seismic isolation device installed between the base structure and the foundation structure, the elastic body comprising:
It has a flat elastic material and a metal plate that are alternately laminated, and the rod-shaped body is characterized by being made of a steel rod whose axis is positioned in the vertical direction. Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. 1 to 4 show an embodiment of a seismic isolation device according to the present invention. The seismic isolation device includes a superstructure 10 such as a building structure,
It is interposed between the foundation structure 12 and is composed of an elastic body 14 that supports a vertical load and deforms elastically in response to a horizontal load, and a rod-shaped body 16 that deforms plastically through a predetermined elastic deformation in response to a horizontal load. ing. The elastic body 14 is made by alternately laminating elastic sheets 14a made of neoprene rubber or the like in the shape of a flat plate and metal sheets 14b made of metal in the same shape with an adhesive interposed therebetween. It is constructed by attaching flat plate-like end plates 14c, 14c, and each end plate 14c, 14c is fixed to the above-mentioned upper structure 10 and foundation structure 12, respectively. This elastic body 14 exhibits a deformation σ property as roughly shown in FIG. 2 in response to a horizontal load Q. The rod-shaped body 16 is specifically a steel rod with a circular cross section, and has recesses 18, 18 formed opposite to the upper structure 10 and the foundation structure 12, and the recesses 18,
The upper and lower ends of the rod-shaped body 16 are loosely fitted into the rod-shaped body 18. Although such a loose fit structure is not necessarily required, if a loose fit structure is adopted, the rod-shaped body 16 can be attached or replaced even more easily. In response to a horizontal load Q, this rod-shaped body 16 exhibits a deformation σ property in which it reaches a yield point Pi through a predetermined elastic deformation region A, and then becomes a plastic deformation region B, as schematically shown in FIG. Here, the yield point Pi is given by the maximum horizontal load Q.
It is preferable to set it so that it is about 1/4 of that.More specifically, since the largest earthquake currently expected has a horizontal displacement of about 30 cm, the yield point Pi is about Set it to about 7.5cm. The deformation behavior of the seismic isolation device having the above-mentioned configuration in response to a horizontal load becomes a substantially parallelogram-shaped history curve as shown by the solid line in FIG. In other words, the seismic isolation device has properties that are a combination of the property curve of the elastic body 14 shown by the dashed line in the figure and the property curve of the rod-shaped body 16 shown by the dotted line. The present inventors set a specific reduced model of the above-mentioned seismic isolation device as follows and attempted vibration analysis. The elastic body 14 is a disc-shaped rubber sheet with a diameter of 150 mm and a steel plate, which are laminated to a thickness of approximately 250 mm, and the elastic modulus is set to 50 kg/cm.The rod-shaped body 16 is 13 mm in diameter and has a length of about 250 mm. We set a steel bar called a so-called PC steel bar C class No. 1 with a length of about 50 cm,
The spacing between 10 and 12 of the upper and substructure is 300mm.
It was set to The elastic modulus of the above steel bar is 112 kg/cm, and the yield point is the point at which it deforms by 1.8 cm under a horizontal load of 200 kg. In addition, the vertical load is 5 tons, and each of these values corresponds to about 1/40 of a 4- to 5-story concrete structure. The analysis results shown in Table 1 below were obtained by setting the above conditions.
【表】
上記結果から本発明の免震装置では、以下の効
果が得られる。
すなわち、現在想定されている巨大地震は、水
平変位が約30cm、最大周期0.1〜1.0秒であり、上
記表1のσ=8cmはほぼこの値に相当する。
このような巨大地震に対しても系全体の固有周
期が1.6秒と長く、地震周期よりもかなり大きく
なる。
従つて、地震周期と共振して振幅が増大するこ
とが防止できる。
また、各変位における減衰定数も比較的大き
く、地震エネルギーを効果的に吸収する。
さらに、建物側に加わる強風等の外力に対して
は、上記棒状体16の弾性領域内でこれを受ける
ため、鉛等の軟質金属を使用した免震装置より
も、構造物の揺れが少く比較的大きな剛性を示
す。
第5図は、この発明の他の実施例を示す概略図
で、その特徴点についてのみ説明する。
この実施例では、棒状体16を略S字状に折曲
し、これを上部構造10と基礎構造12との間に
弾性体14とともに併設しており、S字状棒状体
16は上部構造10の側面と基礎構造12に端部
をそれぞれ固定している。
このように構成した装置でも免震装置は、第4
図に示すような特性が得られる。
そして、この構造の免震装置についても以下に
示すモデル条件で振動解析を行なつた。
すなわち、弾性体14および上部、基礎構造1
0,12間の間隔、鉛直荷重は、それぞれ上記実
施例と同じ値に設定し、S字状棒状体16の直径
は22mmの鋼棒を、その長さが300mmとなるように
同一曲率で折曲するように設定した。
以下の表2は上記条件で解析した結果である。[Table] From the above results, the seismic isolation device of the present invention has the following effects. That is, the currently assumed huge earthquake has a horizontal displacement of approximately 30 cm and a maximum period of 0.1 to 1.0 seconds, and σ = 8 cm in Table 1 above approximately corresponds to this value. Even for such a huge earthquake, the natural period of the entire system is long, 1.6 seconds, which is considerably larger than the earthquake period. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the amplitude from increasing due to resonance with the earthquake cycle. Additionally, the damping constant at each displacement is relatively large, effectively absorbing seismic energy. Furthermore, external forces such as strong winds applied to the building are received within the elastic region of the rod-shaped body 16, so the structure shakes less than a seismic isolation device using soft metals such as lead. Exhibits great rigidity. FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram showing another embodiment of the present invention, and only its characteristic points will be explained. In this embodiment, the rod-shaped body 16 is bent into a substantially S-shape and is installed together with the elastic body 14 between the upper structure 10 and the foundation structure 12. The end portions are fixed to the side surfaces of the base structure 12 and the base structure 12, respectively. Even in a device configured in this way, the seismic isolation device is
The characteristics shown in the figure are obtained. Vibration analysis was also performed on the seismic isolation device of this structure under the model conditions shown below. That is, the elastic body 14 and the upper part, the basic structure 1
The spacing between 0 and 12 and the vertical load are set to the same values as in the above example, and the S-shaped rod body 16 is made by folding a steel rod with a diameter of 22 mm at the same curvature so that its length becomes 300 mm. I set it to play. Table 2 below shows the results of analysis under the above conditions.
【表】
なお、上記S字状棒状体16の弾性係数は87.2
Kg/cm、降伏点は200Kgの水平荷重でσ=2.3cmの
点であつた。
上記表2の結果は、上記表1とそれぞれの値は
若干異なるものの、T(系全体の周期)、heq(減
衰定数)は同じような傾向にあつて、上記実施例
と同等の効果が得られる。
なお、上記各実施例では、棒状体16を単数で
使用する場合について例示したが、これを例えば
紐等で緩く束ねて複数本使用してもよい。
また、第2実施例の棒状体16の折曲形状はS
字形のみではなくU字形であつてもよい。
以上実施例で詳細に説明したように、この発明
に係る免震装置では、弾性体と棒状体とを組合わ
せた変形性状が得られるため、地震エネルギーを
吸収する履歴曲線によつて囲まれた面積を比較的
大きくすることができるとともに、系の周期も地
震周期から離間することができ、共振による問題
も回避される上に、棒状体の軸が鉛直方向に位置
させられているので、上下方向に位置する上部構
造と基礎構造との間にこれを簡単に取付けること
ができ、しかも、取換えも簡単になるという各種
優れた効果が得られる。[Table] The elastic modulus of the S-shaped rod 16 is 87.2.
kg/cm, and the yield point was at σ = 2.3 cm under a horizontal load of 200 kg. Although the results in Table 2 above are slightly different from those in Table 1 above, T (period of the entire system) and heq (damping constant) have similar trends, and the same effect as in the above example can be obtained. It will be done. In each of the above embodiments, a single rod-shaped body 16 is used, but a plurality of rod-shaped bodies 16 may be loosely bundled with a string or the like and used. Furthermore, the bent shape of the rod-shaped body 16 in the second embodiment is S.
It may be not only a letter shape but also a U shape. As explained in detail in the embodiments above, in the seismic isolation device according to the present invention, a deformation property that combines an elastic body and a rod-like body is obtained, so that The area can be made relatively large, the period of the system can be separated from the earthquake period, problems caused by resonance can be avoided, and since the axis of the rod-shaped body is located in the vertical direction, the vertical It can be easily installed between the upper structure and the foundation structure located in the same direction, and it can also be replaced easily, which provides various excellent effects.
第1図はこの発明に係る免震装置の設置状態を
示す図、第2図は弾性体の特性図、第3図は棒状
体の特性図、第4図は免震装置の特性図、第5図
は他の実施例の概略図である。
10……上部構造、12……基礎構造、14…
…弾性体、16……棒状体、18……凹所。
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing the installed state of the seismic isolation device according to the present invention, Fig. 2 is a characteristic diagram of the elastic body, Fig. 3 is a characteristic diagram of the rod-shaped body, and Fig. 4 is a characteristic diagram of the seismic isolation device. FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment. 10...Superstructure, 12...Foundation structure, 14...
...Elastic body, 16... Rod-shaped body, 18... Recess.
Claims (1)
をする弾性体と、水平荷重に対して所定の弾性変
形を経て塑性変形をする棒状体とを上部構造と基
礎構造との間に併設した免震装置であつて、前記
弾性体は、交互に積層された平板状の弾性材と金
属板とを有し、前記棒状体は軸が鉛直方向に位置
させられた鋼棒からなることを特徴とする免震装
置。 2 上記鋼棒は略S字状またはU字状に折曲され
ていることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記
載の免震装置。[Claims] 1. An elastic body that supports a vertical load and deforms elastically in response to a horizontal load, and a rod-shaped body that undergoes a predetermined elastic deformation and plastically deforms in response to a horizontal load are combined into a superstructure and a foundation structure. A seismic isolation device installed between A seismic isolation device characterized by comprising: 2. The seismic isolation device according to claim 1, wherein the steel rod is bent into a substantially S-shape or U-shape.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7656684A JPS60223576A (en) | 1984-04-18 | 1984-04-18 | Earthquake dampening apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7656684A JPS60223576A (en) | 1984-04-18 | 1984-04-18 | Earthquake dampening apparatus |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS60223576A JPS60223576A (en) | 1985-11-08 |
| JPH0262668B2 true JPH0262668B2 (en) | 1990-12-26 |
Family
ID=13608778
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP7656684A Granted JPS60223576A (en) | 1984-04-18 | 1984-04-18 | Earthquake dampening apparatus |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS60223576A (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS63201276A (en) * | 1987-02-16 | 1988-08-19 | 三井建設株式会社 | Support structure of building |
| JPH0674666B2 (en) * | 1987-09-08 | 1994-09-21 | 鹿島建設株式会社 | Seismic isolation device |
| JP3606651B2 (en) * | 1995-10-20 | 2005-01-05 | オイレス工業株式会社 | Seismic response analysis method and analyzer for seismic isolation structure |
| JP4660722B2 (en) * | 2005-03-24 | 2011-03-30 | Sus株式会社 | Vibration control device |
| JP5066369B2 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2012-11-07 | Ihi運搬機械株式会社 | Crane seismic isolation device |
| CN104313998B (en) * | 2014-11-12 | 2016-04-13 | 南京工业大学 | Transverse damping device suitable for large-span bridge |
Family Cites Families (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS59217877A (en) * | 1983-05-25 | 1984-12-08 | 多田 英之 | Earthquake-proof apparatus having attenuating mechanism |
-
1984
- 1984-04-18 JP JP7656684A patent/JPS60223576A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS60223576A (en) | 1985-11-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN117905183A (en) | Four-degree-of-freedom nonlinear energy trap vibration reduction system with anisotropic rigidity and damping | |
| JP2002070943A (en) | Seismic isolation sliding bearing device | |
| JPH02194233A (en) | Anti-seismic device | |
| JP2750362B2 (en) | Damping viscoelastic wall | |
| JPS60223576A (en) | Earthquake dampening apparatus | |
| JPS60223577A (en) | Earthquake dampening apparatus | |
| JP3185678B2 (en) | Seismic isolation device | |
| JPH0542202Y2 (en) | ||
| JPH0430287Y2 (en) | ||
| JP4828053B2 (en) | Structure damping device | |
| JPH0259262B2 (en) | ||
| JPS59210166A (en) | Earthquake-proof apparatus | |
| JPS60258343A (en) | Earthquake dampening apparatus having attenuation function | |
| JPS6114338A (en) | Vibration damping device for structures | |
| JP3021447U (en) | Seismic isolation device | |
| JPH1193458A (en) | Building vibration control method and vibration control structure | |
| JP2801693B2 (en) | Laminated rubber bearing | |
| JPS61151377A (en) | Earthquake-proof apparatus | |
| CN117385728B (en) | A pier-type vibration reduction structure and its design method | |
| JPS63247428A (en) | Earthquake isolator | |
| JP2615644B2 (en) | Seismic isolation device | |
| JPS6334276B2 (en) | ||
| JPS62121279A (en) | Seismic isolation structure | |
| JPH0742744B2 (en) | Damping mechanism for seismic isolation device | |
| JPH08326812A (en) | Layered rubber body using high damping rubber |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |