JPH03242529A - Maintenance aid evaluator - Google Patents
Maintenance aid evaluatorInfo
- Publication number
- JPH03242529A JPH03242529A JP2040243A JP4024390A JPH03242529A JP H03242529 A JPH03242529 A JP H03242529A JP 2040243 A JP2040243 A JP 2040243A JP 4024390 A JP4024390 A JP 4024390A JP H03242529 A JPH03242529 A JP H03242529A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- maintenance
- data
- equipment
- replacement
- cycle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
〔産業上の利用分野〕
この発明はプラント、システムの保守管理技術に関する
ものて、特にプラントを構成する機器の保守管理を支援
する保守支援評価装置に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [Field of Industrial Application] The present invention relates to maintenance management technology for plants and systems, and particularly to a maintenance support evaluation device that supports maintenance management of equipment that constitutes a plant.
(従来の技術)
i 3 illは従来の保守計画及び保守による保守計
画への反映の概念図であり、図において(1)は保守員
であり、(2)は保守の対象機器、(3)及び(4)は
夫々機器(2)を保守し、データを採取する作業を表わ
す。(5)は保守計画であり、作成及びメンテナンス作
業か行なわれる。(Prior art) i 3 ill is a conceptual diagram of a conventional maintenance plan and how maintenance is reflected in the maintenance plan. In the diagram, (1) is a maintenance worker, (2) is a device to be maintained, and (3) and (4) respectively represent the work of maintaining equipment (2) and collecting data. (5) is a maintenance plan, which is created and maintenance work is performed.
(6)は保守実績であり過去の保守データの整理、分析
作業を示す。(6) is the maintenance record, which shows the organization and analysis of past maintenance data.
次に従来の保守計画作業と保守作業との関連につき、第
3図により説明する。まず、保守計画(5)に基つき保
守員(1)はプラントを構成する機器(2)を保守(3
)して行く。尚、この場合保守計画(5)は保守員(1
)が作成するとは限らないが、ここでは簡単の為に保守
員(1)が作成し、メンテナンスするとしている。Next, the relationship between conventional maintenance planning work and maintenance work will be explained with reference to FIG. First, based on the maintenance plan (5), maintenance personnel (1) perform maintenance (3) on the equipment (2) that makes up the plant.
) and go. In this case, the maintenance plan (5) is
), but for the sake of simplicity, it is assumed here that maintenance personnel (1) will create and maintain it.
保守員(1)は機器(2)を保守(3)する事により保
守上のデータ(例えば点検実施内容故障データ、保修内
容、取替部品或いは機器等のデータ)を採取(4)する
。更に保守計画(5)をメンテナンスする為には、収集
された保守実績(6)のデータを整理し分析する必要か
ある。保守実績(6)のデータを分析の結果、例えば保
守周期、および機器(2)の(或いは部品なとの)取替
周期などに於いて保守計画(5)上の数値を修正する必
要か生じるような場合もあり、その場合には保守計画(
5)をフォローすることにより保守を改再して行く。A maintenance worker (1) performs maintenance (3) on a device (2) and collects (4) maintenance data (for example, inspection implementation failure data, maintenance details, replacement parts, equipment, etc. data). Furthermore, in order to maintain the maintenance plan (5), it is necessary to organize and analyze the collected data of the maintenance results (6). As a result of analyzing the data of maintenance record (6), it becomes necessary to modify the figures in maintenance plan (5), for example, the maintenance cycle and the replacement cycle of equipment (2) (or parts). In such cases, the maintenance plan (
By following up on 5), maintenance will be revised.
〔発明か解決しようとする課題)
従来の保守計画の決定は以上のような仕組みて運用され
るため、実際にはプラントの多くの機器からの採取デー
タの整理、分析に時間かかかつ、往つデータ自体、保守
計画に反映し得る適切なデータであるとの保証もあると
は限らない。又、上記の如き過程を経て整理、分析され
るため保守計画に反映する時期は遅れかちとなり、従っ
て機器か故障してから初めて保守計画に反映1−るなと
、事前に取替、保守周期などを早めて事故を未然にV=
8 <ことにはつなかりにくいなとの課題かあった。[Problem to be solved by the invention] Conventional maintenance plan determination is operated using the above-mentioned system, so in reality, organizing and analyzing data collected from many pieces of equipment in a plant is time consuming and time consuming. There is no guarantee that the data itself is appropriate data that can be reflected in maintenance plans. In addition, since it is sorted and analyzed through the process described above, there is a delay in reflecting it in the maintenance plan. Therefore, it is not reflected in the maintenance plan until after the equipment breaks down. etc. to prevent accidents from occurring V=
8 <There was an issue that it was difficult to connect with others.
この発明は、上記のような課題を解決するためになされ
たものて、プラントを構成する機器のより適正な保守周
期、取替周期等を提供することにより、ダイナミックに
保守計画を修正し、プラントの予防保全に活用すること
ができる保守支援評価装置を得ることを目的とする。This invention was made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and by providing a more appropriate maintenance cycle, replacement cycle, etc. for the equipment that makes up the plant, it is possible to dynamically modify the maintenance plan and improve the plant efficiency. The purpose of this study is to obtain a maintenance support evaluation device that can be used for preventive maintenance.
この発明に係る保守支援評価装置は、プラントを構成す
る機器の保守に必要な特定パラメータを収集する収集手
段、この収集手段で収集された特定パラメータと保守基
準データ及び過去の保守実績データとを比較し上記機器
の劣化状態を推定評価する評価手段、この評価手段によ
り推定評価された結果にもとづき上記機器の取替周期及
び保守周期を求め表示する手段を設けたものである。The maintenance support evaluation device according to the present invention includes a collection means for collecting specific parameters necessary for maintenance of equipment constituting a plant, and a comparison of the specific parameters collected by the collection means with maintenance standard data and past maintenance performance data. The present invention is provided with an evaluation means for estimating and evaluating the state of deterioration of the equipment, and means for determining and displaying the replacement cycle and maintenance cycle of the equipment based on the results estimated and evaluated by the evaluation means.
(作用)
この発明における保守支援評価装置は、プラントを構成
する機器の保守に必要な特定パラメータを収集手段によ
り収集し、この収集された特定パラメータと保守基準デ
ータ及び過去の保守実績データとを比較して上記機器の
劣化状態を推定評価して、その結果にもとづき上記機器
の取替周期および保守周期を求め表示する。(Operation) The maintenance support evaluation device according to the present invention collects specific parameters necessary for maintenance of equipment constituting a plant using a collecting means, and compares the collected specific parameters with maintenance standard data and past maintenance performance data. The deterioration state of the equipment is estimated and evaluated, and the replacement cycle and maintenance cycle of the equipment are determined and displayed based on the results.
以下、この発明の一実施例を図について説明する。第1
図において、(7)はこの装置の管理用計算機であり、
保守員はマンマシン装置(8〉としての例えばティスプ
レィ装置により本装置と対話する。(9)は例えば保守
計画データ、保守評価用データ、保守評価プログラム等
を記憶したディスクであり、(6)は、保守実績データ
を記憶したディスクを示す。An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings. 1st
In the figure, (7) is the management computer for this device,
A maintenance worker interacts with this device using a display device as a man-machine device (8), for example. (9) is a disk that stores, for example, maintenance plan data, maintenance evaluation data, maintenance evaluation program, etc., and (6) is a , indicates a disk that stores maintenance performance data.
(10〉は管理用計算機(7)と診断装置(11)との
間のデータ伝送路を示す。(12)はff’−断装置(
11)にるいて診断に必要な基準データを記憶するティ
スフである。(13)は保守対象機器(21,2−2・
−・−2−m )からのパラメータの収集装置δであり
、診断装置(11)に(&続されている。(10> indicates the data transmission path between the management computer (7) and the diagnostic device (11). (12) indicates the ff'-disconnection device (
11) It is a tisf that stores reference data necessary for diagnosis. (13) is the equipment to be maintained (21, 2-2,
−·−2−m ) and is connected to the diagnostic device (11) (&).
これら保守データの収集部は診断方式、対象機器の構成
¥Fにより複数となる場合か多くこれを(14−1,1
4−2・・・・l4−n)にて示す。There may be multiple collection units for these maintenance data depending on the diagnosis method and the configuration of the target equipment (14-1, 1).
4-2...l4-n).
ここで第1図についてデータの流れを説明する。The flow of data will now be explained with reference to FIG.
保守対象機器(2−1,2−2・・・・2−m)からパ
ラメータ収集装置(13)により収集されたデータは、
診断装置(11)にて、基準データ(12)、過去デー
タ(6)等と比較され、取替時期、等を推定する。The data collected by the parameter collection device (13) from the equipment to be maintained (2-1, 2-2...2-m) is
A diagnostic device (11) compares it with reference data (12), past data (6), etc., and estimates the replacement time.
これらの推定された取替時期データはデータ伝送路(1
0)を介して管理用計算機(7)に送られる。ここに送
られた取替時期データをもとに、評価プログラムにより
取替周期及び保守周期などが算出され、ティスプレィ装
置(マンマシン装置)(8)により表示される。保守員
はそれらのテタ及び保守実績データ(6)を参考にして
保守計画データ(9)を修正することが出来る。These estimated replacement timing data are transmitted through the data transmission path (1
0) to the management computer (7). Based on the replacement time data sent here, the evaluation program calculates the replacement cycle, maintenance cycle, etc., and displays them on the display device (man-machine device) (8). The maintenance staff can modify the maintenance plan data (9) by referring to the data and maintenance performance data (6).
次に第2図において機能を説明する。Next, the functions will be explained with reference to FIG.
保守対象機器(2)からの特定のパラメータかパラメー
タ収集装置(13)により収集(4)され、劣化等の基
準データ(12)及び過去データ(6)等と比較され取
替時期等を推定する。算出された取替時期テークをもと
に評価プログラムにより、ライフサイクル費用等も考慮
しながら取替周期、保守周期等を算出する(71)。こ
れらはマンマシン(デイスプレィ)装置(8)により表
示され、保守実績データ(6)と共に保守員(1)か保
守計画データ(7)を修正する時の参考となる。Specific parameters from the equipment to be maintained (2) are collected (4) by the parameter collection device (13) and compared with standard data (12) such as deterioration, past data (6), etc. to estimate replacement time, etc. . Based on the calculated replacement period, the evaluation program calculates the replacement period, maintenance period, etc. while also taking into account life cycle costs and the like (71). These are displayed by a man-machine (display) device (8) and serve as a reference when the maintenance person (1) corrects the maintenance plan data (7) together with the maintenance performance data (6).
また保守実績データ(6)は保守内容(保守日、点検内
容、点検結果、取替部品故障状況等の実績データであり
マンマシン装置(8)よりデータヘース(6)を更新す
るようになっている。In addition, maintenance performance data (6) is performance data such as maintenance details (maintenance date, inspection details, inspection results, replacement parts failure status, etc.), and is updated in the data header (6) by the man-machine device (8). .
なお、取替周期の評価法の一例につき第4図(A)およ
び(B)により説明する。An example of a method for evaluating the replacement cycle will be explained with reference to FIGS. 4(A) and 4(B).
第4図(A>に特定パラメータの変化傾向により取替時
期を推定する場合の例を示す。最近のテークの傾向より
取替時期と判定するパラメータ値Poに至る時間か1i
143° に変更となった場合を示す。Figure 4 (A>) shows an example of estimating the replacement time based on the change trend of a specific parameter.The time taken to reach the parameter value Po, which determines the replacement time based on the recent trend of take, is 1i.
The case where the angle is changed to 143° is shown.
第4+a(B)に取替時期aに基つき、ライフサイクル
費用を考慮した取替周期Xを求める一例を示す。4th+a(B) shows an example of determining the replacement cycle X based on the replacement time a and taking into account the life cycle cost.
図において保守周期:d、その時の保守費用:b(取替
費用もbとする)、取替周期:X、取替時の機器の単価
二〇、取替えないことにより発生が考えられる事故によ
る損失:Y、発生か考えられる時期:2としたとき健全
な保守と云える定数をmとしたとき、
とするとき、即ち、
X〈取替時期(a又はa’ )なるXを取替周期と考え
ている。In the diagram, maintenance cycle: d, maintenance cost at that time: b (replacement cost is also assumed to be b), replacement cycle: : Y, time when it is thought to occur: 2 When the constant that can be considered as sound maintenance is m, In other words, when X〈replacement period (a or a'), X is the replacement period. thinking.
以上は装置として管理用計算機(7)と診断装置(11
)、データ収集装置(13)に分離されたシステム構成
の例を示したかこれらか一体となった装置でもよく、又
、保守データ収集系もl系統でもよい。The above devices include a management computer (7) and a diagnostic device (11).
), a data collection device (13) are shown as an example of a separate system configuration, but these may be integrated into one device, and the maintenance data collection system may also be an 1 system.
又、保守計画テーク(9)修正或いは保守実績データヘ
ース(6)の更新を保守員がマニュアルにて行う例を示
したか、これらは自動或はオンラインにて行うことも可
能である。Further, although the example has been shown in which maintenance personnel manually modify the maintenance plan take (9) or update the maintenance record data (6), these can also be done automatically or online.
又、パラメータ収集装置(13)への入力が自動となっ
ているか、逆にマニュアルにて入力することも考えられ
る。It is also conceivable that the input to the parameter collection device (13) is automatic or, conversely, input manually.
又、取替時期、取替周期の考え方は一例を示したに過き
ない。(対象機器毎に適した診断法があり、又、ライフ
サイクル費用についての考え方は様々である)。Furthermore, the concept of replacement timing and replacement cycle is merely an example. (There are diagnostic methods suitable for each target device, and there are various ways of thinking about life cycle costs.)
以上のようにこの発明によればプラントを構成する機器
の劣化状況の変化に応して迅速に取替周囲および保守周
期を推定することか出来るため、を防保全に効果か期待
されると共に、保守計画を迅速に適正化することができ
るものが得られる効果かある。As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to quickly estimate the replacement area and maintenance cycle in accordance with changes in the deterioration status of the equipment that makes up the plant, and it is expected to be effective in preventive maintenance. There is an effect of being able to quickly optimize the maintenance plan.
第1図はこの発明の一実施例による保守支援評価装置を
云す概略構成図、第2図は第1図の動作説明のための説
明図、第3図は従来の保守の古注を説明する説明図、第
4図(A)および(B)は第1図の装置の取替周期及び
保守周期を求めるための考え方を説明する説明図である
。
図において、(6)は保守実績データ、(7)は管理用
計算機、(8)はマンマシン装置、(9)は保守計画デ
ータ、(11)は診断装置、(12)は基準データ、(
13)はパラメータ収集装置である。
なお、図中同一符号は同一、又は相当部分を示す。FIG. 1 is a schematic configuration diagram of a maintenance support evaluation device according to an embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the operation of FIG. 1, and FIG. 3 is an explanation of old notes on conventional maintenance. FIGS. 4(A) and 4(B) are explanatory diagrams illustrating the concept for determining the replacement cycle and maintenance cycle of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1. In the figure, (6) is maintenance performance data, (7) is a management computer, (8) is a man-machine device, (9) is maintenance plan data, (11) is a diagnostic device, (12) is standard data, (
13) is a parameter collection device. Note that the same reference numerals in the figures indicate the same or equivalent parts.
Claims (1)
を収集する収集手段、この収集手段で収集された特定パ
ラメータと保守基準データ及び過去の保守実績データと
を比較し上記機器の劣化状態を推定評価する評価手段、
この評価手段により推定評価された結果にもとづき上記
機器の取替周期及び保守周期を求め表示する手段を備え
た保守支援評価装置。A collection means for collecting specific parameters necessary for maintenance of equipment that constitutes a plant, and comparing the specific parameters collected by this collection means with maintenance standard data and past maintenance performance data to estimate and evaluate the deterioration state of the equipment. evaluation means,
A maintenance support evaluation device comprising means for determining and displaying the replacement cycle and maintenance cycle of the equipment based on the estimated evaluation result by the evaluation means.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2040243A JPH03242529A (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1990-02-20 | Maintenance aid evaluator |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2040243A JPH03242529A (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1990-02-20 | Maintenance aid evaluator |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH03242529A true JPH03242529A (en) | 1991-10-29 |
Family
ID=12575272
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2040243A Pending JPH03242529A (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1990-02-20 | Maintenance aid evaluator |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH03242529A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2001073633A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-04 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Construction machine managing method and system, and arithmetic processing device |
| JP2003308428A (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2003-10-31 | Asahi Kasei Corp | Long-term profit simulation system considering building maintenance costs |
| WO2006034852A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method and device for the diagnosis of technical devices disposed within an industrial installation |
| US7286966B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2007-10-23 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Rotation planning apparatus and rotation planning system |
| JP2011086219A (en) * | 2009-10-19 | 2011-04-28 | J Morita Tokyo Mfg Corp | Device for transmitting maintenance information and material order information of dental equipment |
-
1990
- 1990-02-20 JP JP2040243A patent/JPH03242529A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2001073633A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-10-04 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Construction machine managing method and system, and arithmetic processing device |
| US6810362B2 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2004-10-26 | Hitachi Construction Machinery Co., Ltd. | Construction machine managing method and system, and arithmetic processing device |
| US7286966B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2007-10-23 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Rotation planning apparatus and rotation planning system |
| JP2003308428A (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2003-10-31 | Asahi Kasei Corp | Long-term profit simulation system considering building maintenance costs |
| WO2006034852A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Abb Patent Gmbh | Method and device for the diagnosis of technical devices disposed within an industrial installation |
| JP2011086219A (en) * | 2009-10-19 | 2011-04-28 | J Morita Tokyo Mfg Corp | Device for transmitting maintenance information and material order information of dental equipment |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| NO337835B1 (en) | Procedure and system for real-time operations and maintenance | |
| JP2009047683A (en) | Performance estimator for clinical diagnostic analyzer | |
| KR20050060251A (en) | Prevention system and the method for maintenance of railway car using rams analysis | |
| CN118411040B (en) | Intelligent management and control method, device and system for major security risk of enterprise | |
| CN118229403A (en) | Automatic approval system and method for micro-credit | |
| CN118426394A (en) | Intelligent building energy operation and maintenance method and system based on Internet of things | |
| CN120494406A (en) | Method and device for regulating and controlling progress of test task, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| Yin Kwok et al. | A quality control and improvement system based on the total control methodology (TCM) | |
| JPH03242529A (en) | Maintenance aid evaluator | |
| Aju Kumar et al. | Maintenance performance evaluation using an integrated approach of graph theory, ISM and matrix method | |
| CN114995302A (en) | Intelligent control method and system | |
| Deliman et al. | Optimization of process improvement and inspection location for serial manufacturing | |
| CN107230020A (en) | Evaluate and test the method and its correlation technique and system of high ferro dispatcher's job engineering efficiency | |
| CN119294810A (en) | An industrial plant environmental risk management and control system | |
| WO2002059807A2 (en) | Data anlysis method | |
| JPH03160201A (en) | Device assisting in diagnosis of plant life | |
| CN117853073A (en) | Project supervision management informatization system | |
| JPH08320644A (en) | Driving training support device | |
| Jaw et al. | ICEMS: A platform for advanced condition-based health management | |
| WO2019130469A1 (en) | Maintenance design assistance system | |
| JP2003058242A (en) | Plant operation support system | |
| CN114139102A (en) | Numerical control machining quality risk early warning method | |
| JPH064543A (en) | Equipment checking schedule preparing device | |
| Alber et al. | Idaho chemical processing plant failure rate database | |
| RU19600U1 (en) | CHERNYAKOV-PETRUSHIN DEVICE FOR EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF ORGANIZATIONAL-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS |