JPH0340612B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0340612B2 JPH0340612B2 JP10319886A JP10319886A JPH0340612B2 JP H0340612 B2 JPH0340612 B2 JP H0340612B2 JP 10319886 A JP10319886 A JP 10319886A JP 10319886 A JP10319886 A JP 10319886A JP H0340612 B2 JPH0340612 B2 JP H0340612B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- vertebral body
- vertebrae
- length
- edge length
- deformation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 210000000115 thoracic cavity Anatomy 0.000 description 16
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 8
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 description 8
- 206010010214 Compression fracture Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 208000001132 Osteoporosis Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 210000000988 bone and bone Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 206010068975 Bone atrophy Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000001009 osteoporotic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000020084 Bone disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940079593 drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002320 radius Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002303 tibia Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000000623 ulna Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Description
<産業上の利用分野>
本発明は椎体変形判定のためのX線写真像の評
価方法に関する。更に詳細には、本発明は脊柱を
形成する骨の一つである椎体の変形の類別判定の
ためのX線写真像の評価方法に関する。骨粗鬆症
に伴う椎体変形の有無並びに変形の類別判定は、
骨粗鬆症の進行度の把握並びに治療効果の確認の
ために非常に重要である。
<従来の技術>
従来、脊柱を形成する骨の一つである椎体の変
形の有無については、胸椎、腰椎の側面X線像よ
り医師が眼で見て判定しているが、例えば大腿
骨、脛骨、橈骨、尺骨などの所謂長管骨の骨折に
比べて、椎体変形は楔状変形、圧迫骨折、陥凹骨
折などであるため判定が困難であり、判定に個人
差が入ることは免れ得ず、又、治療効果の確認の
ために経時変化を追跡しようとしても、数量化さ
れていないため、変形が進行していても必ずしも
正確に判定出来なかつた。
又、第3腰椎の中央長aと前縁長dとの比
(a/d)を求めて骨萎縮度の指標(Lumbar
Spine Score)としたり、第3腰椎の縦横の骨梁
の変化を見て骨萎縮度の指標(滋恵大分類重症
度)としたりする方法はるいは、椎体の中央長
a、前縁長d、後縁長cを測定して椎体の骨折を
判定することが報告されているが〔ザ・ニユー・
イングランド・ジヤーナル・オブ・メデイスン
(The New England Journal of Medicine)、
vol306446(1982年2月25日)〕、椎体の変形のタイ
プを類別判定する方法は従来、知られていない。
<発明が解決しようとする問題点>
本発明者らは、椎体変形の客観的な評価方法に
ついて鋭意研究した結果、椎体の側面X線写真像
より、前縁、後縁、中央部などの長さを正確に計
測し、椎体の各部分の比率を求めて、椎体の長さ
と比率とを組合せた判定基準により、椎体変形の
有無を客観的に判定しうることを見出し、更に、
椎体変形のタイプを、椎体の長さと比率とを組合
せた判定基準により判定し、該変形タイプの変化
並びに椎体の長さの変化などから椎体変形の経時
的な進行をも判定しうることを見出し、本発明を
完成したものである。
<問題点を解決するための手段>
本発明によれば、椎体の側面X線写真像より、
中央長a、後縁長c、及び前縁長dを計測し、更
にc/d、a/c、及びa/dの比を求め、これ
らc,d、c/d、a/cおよびa/dより、椎
体の変形の類別を判定することを特徴とする椎体
変形判定のためのX線写真像の評価方法が提供さ
れる。
従来は、椎体の側面X線写真像(以下「側面X
線像」という)を医師が眼で見て、椎体変形を判
定していたが、本発明方法は、椎体の各部の長さ
を計測し、医師判定を対照としながら判定基準を
作成し、その判定基準に従つて椎体変形の有無並
びに変形タイプの類別判定を客観的に行なう方法
である。
以下に本発明のX線写真像の評価方法を、より
具体的に説明する。
() 先ず、変形のない椎体の側面X線より各椎
体毎に、中央長a、後縁長c、前縁長dを計測
し、cの平均値,dの平均値、並びに標準
偏差σを求める。
上記の測定は、椎体変形を判定しようとする
患者より求まる中央長a、後縁長c、前縁長d
等の判定基準となる基準値を得るためのもので
ある。
測定しようとする変形のない椎体は、椎体変
形を判定しようとする患者の年令を考慮に入れ
て、通常50才以上から75才位いまでの年令の人
の椎体であることが好ましい。また男女別に区
分して測定するのが好ましく、それぞれ約50個
以上の椎体について測定することが望ましい。
椎体の側面X線像を撮影するにあたり、胸椎
は第1胸椎から第12胸椎まで、腰椎は第1腰椎
から第5腰椎まで、合せて17個の椎体があるの
で、例えば、第8胸椎を中心とする側面X線像
と第3腰椎を中心とする側面X線像とに分けて
撮影することが有利である。なお、第8胸椎を
中心とする側面X線像では第1胸椎は殆んどの
場合、正確に計測出来ず、第2及び第3胸椎も
不鮮明な場合が多いが、これらの椎体では椎体
変形の頻度は大きくないので、第4胸椎又は第
5胸椎から測定出来れば十分である。
椎体の中央長a、後縁長c、前縁長dは、具
体的には第1図に示した通りである。これらの
値を求めるには、椎体の側面X線像より、例え
ば物差し、ノギスなどで、椎体毎に中央長a、
後縁長c、前縁長dを計測しても良いが、デイ
ジタイザーを通して第1図に示す1〜6の6点
をコンピユーターに入力して中央長a(3−
4)、後縁長c(5−6)、前縁長d(1−2)を
計測すると共に、C/d、a/c、a/dの比
率を計算することも出来る。又、例えば、テレ
ビカメラ等で、黒化度を記憶し、画像処理によ
り、椎体各部の長さを自動計測してもよい。
() 次いで、椎体変形を判定しようとする患者
の椎体の側面X線像より、()と同様にして、
椎体毎に、中央長a、後縁長c、前縁長dを計
測し、更にc/d、a/c、a/dの比を計算
して求める。
これらの測定等は上記()の場合と全く同
様にして行なうことができる。
() 次いでa,c,d、c/d、a/c及び
a/dより、椎体変形の判定は、例えば以下の
ようにして行なうことができる。
即ち、
(A) c/d、c,d、a/c、a/dが以下の
条件を満足する場合に「変形なし」(タイプ
N)と判定することができる。
(a) 0.70<c/d<1.40
(b) c≧−2〓、d≧−1.5〓のうちの少く
とも1つを満足
(c) a/c<0.80、a/d<0.80のうちの少
くとも1つを満足
かかる「変化なし」の判定基準としては、第
1条件(a)として後縁長と前縁長との比c/d
が、0.70と1.40との間である必要がある。後
述する様にc/dが1.40以上になると、前縁
部が、変形した楔状椎となり、c/dが0.70
以下になると、実際には、非常に少ないが、
後縁部が変形した逆楔状椎となるからであ
る。
次いで、第2条件(b)として、後縁長c、前
縁長dのうちの少くとも1つが、()で求
めた変形のない椎体の後縁長cと前縁長dの
平均値をそれぞれ及びとした時、−
2σ及び−1.5σより大きい必要がある。典型
的な健常椎体では、a,c,d共に大きく、
a≧−2σ、c≧−2σ、d≧−1.5σであ
るが、椎体が少し圧迫されて、a<−2σ
となつた場合でも、c≧−2σ又はd≧
−1.5ρのいずれか1つの条件が満たされれ
ば、明らかな椎体変形とは認められず、「変
形なし」と判定して差し支えない。
第3条件(c)として、a/c、a/dのうち
の少くとも1つが0.80以上であることが必要
である。a/c、a/dいずれもが、0.80以
下の場合、即ち後縁長c、前縁長dに比べ
て、中央長aが特に小さい場合、後述の様に
魚椎と判定されるからである。
以上の理由から、上記(a)、(b)、(c)の条件を
満足する場合には、「変化なし」と判定する
ことができる。
上記(a)、(b)、(c)の条件あるいは後述する各
条件と「変化なし」を含めた後述する椎体変
形の各タイプとの関係は第2図に示した。
(B) c/dが、c/d≧1.40の場合に「楔状
椎」(タイプ)と判定することができる。
楔状椎は、第3図に示した如く前縁部に変
形が起つて、後縁長cに比べて前縁長dが特
に小さくなつている状態であり、例えば前縁
長が後縁長の3/4になつた場合(c/d=
1.33)に、既に、楔状椎体の変形が認められ
るが、必ずしも、明確な楔状椎と認められな
い場合もある。一方、前縁長が後縁長の2/3
になつた場合(c/d=1.50)には、明確
に、楔状椎と認められるので、c/d≧1.40
を楔状椎の判定基準とした。
楔状椎(タイプ)には、所謂楔状椎の他
にも、上縁圧迫骨折、上縁陥凹骨折、下縁圧
迫骨折、下縁陥凹骨折などにより、結果的に
楔状椎様に、前縁長が短かくなつた変形を含
み、又、後述の如くa<−2σ、c<−
2σ、d<−1.5σで扁平椎と判定される椎体
でも、特に、前縁部の変形が著しく、c/d
≧1.40を満足する場合にも、楔状椎として判
定することができる。
(C) c/dが、c/d≦0.70の場合に「逆楔状
椎」(タイプ)と判定することができる。
逆楔状椎は、楔状椎が前縁部に変形が起つ
て後縁長cに比べて前縁長dが小さくなつて
いるのと逆に、後縁部に変形が起つて、前縁
長dに比べて後縁長cが小さくなつている椎
体として定義されるが(第3図参照)実際に
は、この様な椎体は殆んど存在しない。第5
腰椎では、実施例1に示す如く、前縁長dに
比べて、後縁長cが小さく、c/dの平均値
は0.95と1以下になつているが、後縁長cが
前縁長dの3/4になつた場合(c/d=0.75)
でも明確に逆楔状椎と認められない場合もあ
り、従つて、c/d≦0.70の場合に、逆楔状
椎(タイプ)と判定することができる。
(D) c,d、c/dが以下の条件を満足する場
合に「扁平椎」(タイプ)と判定すること
ができる。
(a) c<−2σ
(b) d<−1.5σ
(c) 0.70<c/d<1.40
第1条件(a)、第2条件(b)は後縁長c、前縁
長dが、変形のない椎体の平均値を及び
とした時、−2σ及び−1.5σより共に小さ
いこと、即ち、c<−2σで、且つd<
−1.5σである。
扁平椎は、前縁部、中央部、後縁部が比較
的均一に圧迫されて変形した椎体であり(第
3図参照)、即ち前縁長d、中央長a、後縁
部cが、いずれも小さくなつている。実施例
1の変形のない椎体の各部の長さの平均値が
示す様に、変形のない椎体でも、中央長a
は、前縁長dや後縁長cに比べて小さいの
で、扁平椎の特徴は、前縁長dと後縁長cが
特に小さくなつていることであり、c<−
2σで且つ、d<−1.5σである椎体を扁平椎
(タイプ)と判定する。なお、cは−2σ、
dは−1.5σとしたのは、実施例1に示す様に
c>であるので、この様な条件を設定する
ことにより、c及びdは、ほぼ等しい値とな
り、扁平椎としての条件を満たす様になるか
らである。第2条件(c)は、0.70<c/d<
1.40である。a<−2σ、c<−2σ、d<
d−1.5σの場合でも、特に前縁部の変形が著
しく、c/d≧1.40の場合には、前述の如
く、楔状椎と判定され、後縁部の変形が著し
くc/d≦0.70の場合には、逆楔状椎と判定
されるからである。
(E) c/d、c,d、a/c、a/dが以下の
条件を満足する場合に「魚椎」(タイプ)
と判定することができる。
(a) 0.70<c/d<1.40
(b) c<−2σ、d<−1.5σのうちの少く
とも1つを満足
(c) a/c≦0.80で且つ、a/d≦0.80
「魚椎」とは、中央部に陥凹骨折や圧迫骨
折が生じて、中央長aが、前縁長d、後縁長
cに比べて特に小さくなつている椎体である
(第3図参照)。従つて、楔状椎、扁平椎、逆
楔状椎を除く所謂「変形なし」のうちで、特
に中央長aが小さくなつている。前縁長a、
後縁長cに比べて、中央長aが小さくなり、
a/c<0.90で且つa/d<0.90となると、
既に魚椎様の変形が認められるが、必ずしも
明確な魚椎と認められない場合もあり、a/
c<0.80で且つa/d<0.80を魚椎の判定基
準とすることができる。
魚椎(タイプ)には、所謂、魚椎の他に
も、上縁圧迫骨折、上縁陥凹骨折、下縁圧迫
骨折、下縁陥凹骨折などにより、結果的に魚
椎様に、中央長が短かくなつた変形を含んで
いる。
以上の如くにして「変化なし」「楔状椎」「逆楔
状椎」「扁平椎」「魚椎」の判定基準について記し
たが、これらの判定基準の関係について第2図に
示した。
上記した判定においては、好ましい一例として
c/dの判定基準として、上限を1.4、下限0.70
を選んで説明したが、これらの値は、例えば上限
の場合には、1.25〜1.55の範囲から任意に選ぶこ
とができる。好ましくは1.33〜1.50、更に好まし
くは1.40〜1.45の範囲から選ぶことができる。下
限は、通常0.80〜0.60、好ましくは0.75〜0.65の
範囲から任意に選ぶことができる。
a/c及びa/dの判定基準として、「変形な
し」、「魚椎」の場合に0.8を選んだが、この値は、
通常0.65〜0.90、好ましくは0.70〜0.85、更に好
ましくは0.75〜0.80の範囲から任意に選ぶことが
できる。
c及びdの判定基準として、「変形なし」、「扁
平椎」、「魚椎」の場合に、−2σ、−1.5σを選
んだが、cの判定基準としては、通常−1.0σ〜
c−2.5σ、好ましくは−1.25σ〜−2.25σ、特
に好ましくは−1.5σ〜−2.0σの範囲から任意
に選ぶことができる。dの判定基準も同様に、通
常、−1.0σ〜−2.5σ、好ましくは、−1.25σ
〜−2.25σ、特に好ましくは−1.5σ〜−2.0σ
の範囲から任意に選ぶことができる。
<発明の効果>
本発明のX線写真像の評価方法によれば、椎体
変形のタイプを客観的に評価することができ、ま
た該変形タイプの変化、椎体変形の経時的な進行
をも判定することができる。
また、骨粗鬆症等の骨疾患の進行度の拒握並び
に治療効果の確認のためにも非常に有用である。
<実施例>
実施例 1
50才から75才の女性の第8胸椎並びに第3腰椎
を中心とする胸腰椎の側面X線像より各椎体毎
に、前縁長d、中央長a、後縁長c、椎体幅bを
計測し、医師により「変化なし」と判定された椎
体について、a,b,c,dの測定値並びにc/
dの計算値の各椎体毎の平均値()並びに標準
偏差(α)は、第1表の様になる。
<Industrial Application Field> The present invention relates to a method for evaluating X-ray photographic images for determining vertebral body deformation. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method for evaluating X-ray images for determining the classification of deformation of a vertebral body, which is one of the bones forming the spinal column. To determine the presence or absence of vertebral body deformity due to osteoporosis and the classification of deformity,
This is extremely important for understanding the progress of osteoporosis and confirming the effectiveness of treatment. <Conventional technology> Conventionally, doctors have visually determined the presence or absence of deformation of the vertebral body, which is one of the bones that form the spinal column, using side X-ray images of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Compared to fractures of so-called long bones such as the tibia, radius, and ulna, vertebral body deformities are difficult to diagnose because they include wedge-shaped deformities, compression fractures, and depressed fractures, and individual differences in diagnosis are inevitable. Moreover, even when trying to track changes over time to confirm the therapeutic effect, it was not always possible to accurately determine the progression of deformation because it was not quantified. In addition, the ratio (a/d) between the median length a and the anterior edge length d of the third lumbar vertebra was determined and used as an index of the degree of bone atrophy (Lumbar).
Spine Score) or an index of the degree of bone atrophy (Shigei classification severity) by looking at changes in the vertical and horizontal trabeculae of the third lumbar vertebrae. It has been reported that fractures of the vertebral body can be determined by measuring the posterior edge length c [The New
The New England Journal of Medicine,
vol306446 (February 25, 1982)], there is no known method for classifying the types of vertebral body deformities. <Problems to be Solved by the Invention> As a result of intensive research into an objective evaluation method for vertebral body deformation, the present inventors have determined that the anterior edge, posterior edge, central portion, etc. We have discovered that it is possible to objectively determine the presence or absence of vertebral deformity by accurately measuring the length of the vertebral body, determining the ratio of each part of the vertebral body, and using a criterion that combines the length and ratio of the vertebral body, Furthermore,
The type of vertebral body deformation is determined using criteria that combine the length and ratio of the vertebral body, and the progression of vertebral body deformation over time is also determined from changes in the deformation type and the length of the vertebral body. The present invention has been completed based on the discovery that this can be achieved. <Means for Solving the Problems> According to the present invention, from a lateral X-ray image of a vertebral body,
Measure the median length a, trailing edge length c, and leading edge length d, and further calculate the ratios of c/d, a/c, and a/d, and calculate these c, d, c/d, a/c, and a. /d provides a method for evaluating an X-ray photographic image for determining vertebral body deformation, which is characterized by determining the type of vertebral body deformation. Conventionally, lateral X-ray images of vertebral bodies (hereinafter referred to as ``lateral
In contrast, the method of the present invention measures the length of each part of the vertebral body and creates judgment criteria using the doctor's judgment as a reference. This is a method for objectively determining the presence or absence of vertebral body deformation and the classification of the deformation type according to the criteria. The method for evaluating X-ray photographic images of the present invention will be explained in more detail below. () First, measure the median length a, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d for each vertebral body from a lateral X-ray of an undeformed vertebral body, and calculate the average value of c, the average value of d, and the standard deviation. Find σ. The above measurements are the median length a, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d determined by the patient whose vertebral body deformity is to be determined.
This is to obtain a reference value that will be used as a judgment criterion. The undeformed vertebral body to be measured should be a vertebral body of a person whose age is usually from 50 years or older to about 75 years old, taking into account the age of the patient whose vertebral body deformity is to be determined. is preferred. It is also preferable to perform measurements separately for men and women, and it is desirable to measure approximately 50 or more vertebral bodies for each. When taking a lateral X-ray image of a vertebral body, there are a total of 17 vertebral bodies, the thoracic vertebrae from the 1st thoracic vertebrae to the 12th thoracic vertebrae, and the lumbar vertebrae from the 1st lumbar vertebrae to the 5th lumbar vertebrae, so for example, the 8th thoracic vertebrae It is advantageous to separate the images into a lateral X-ray image centered on the third lumbar vertebra and a lateral X-ray image centered on the third lumbar vertebra. In addition, in lateral X-ray images centered on the 8th thoracic vertebra, the 1st thoracic vertebrae cannot be accurately measured in most cases, and the 2nd and 3rd thoracic vertebrae are often unclear, but in these vertebral bodies, Since the frequency of deformity is not large, it is sufficient to measure from the fourth or fifth thoracic vertebrae. The central length a, the posterior edge length c, and the anterior edge length d of the vertebral body are specifically as shown in FIG. To obtain these values, use a ruler, caliper, etc. to determine the median length a,
Although the trailing edge length c and the leading edge length d may be measured, the median length a (3-
4) It is also possible to measure the trailing edge length c (5-6) and the leading edge length d (1-2) and calculate the ratios of C/d, a/c, and a/d. Alternatively, the length of each part of the vertebral body may be automatically measured by storing the degree of darkening using a television camera or the like and performing image processing. () Next, from the lateral X-ray image of the vertebral body of the patient whose vertebral body deformity is to be determined, in the same manner as in (),
For each vertebral body, the median length a, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d are measured, and the ratios of c/d, a/c, and a/d are calculated. These measurements, etc. can be performed in exactly the same manner as in the case () above. () Next, from a, c, d, c/d, a/c, and a/d, the vertebral body deformation can be determined, for example, as follows. That is, when (A) c/d, c, d, a/c, and a/d satisfy the following conditions, it can be determined that there is "no deformation" (type N). (a) 0.70<c/d<1.40 (b) At least one of c≧−2〓, d≧−1.5〓 is satisfied (c) a/c<0.80, a/d<0.80 The first condition (a) is the ratio c/d of the trailing edge length to the leading edge length.
must be between 0.70 and 1.40. As described later, when c/d becomes 1.40 or more, the anterior edge becomes a deformed cuneiform vertebra, and c/d becomes 0.70.
The following is actually very small, but
This is because it becomes a reverse cuneiform vertebrae with a deformed posterior edge. Next, as the second condition (b), at least one of the posterior edge length c and the anterior edge length d is the average value of the posterior edge length c and the anterior edge length d of the undeformed vertebral bodies obtained in (). When and respectively, −
Must be greater than 2σ and −1.5σ. In a typical healthy vertebral body, a, c, and d are large;
a≧-2σ, c≧-2σ, d≧-1.5σ, but the vertebral body is slightly compressed and a<-2σ
Even if c≧−2σ or d≧
If any one of the conditions of -1.5ρ is satisfied, no obvious vertebral body deformation is recognized and it can be determined that there is "no deformation". As the third condition (c), at least one of a/c and a/d must be 0.80 or more. If both a/c and a/d are 0.80 or less, that is, if the median length a is particularly small compared to the posterior edge length c and the anterior edge length d, it will be determined to be a fish vertebra as described below. be. For the above reasons, if the conditions (a), (b), and (c) above are satisfied, it can be determined that there is no change. The relationship between the conditions (a), (b), and (c) above or each condition described later and each type of vertebral body deformation described later including "no change" is shown in FIG. (B) When c/d is c/d≧1.40, it can be determined as “cuneiform vertebrae” (type). As shown in Figure 3, the cuneiform vertebra is in a state where the anterior edge is deformed and the anterior edge length d is particularly small compared to the posterior edge length c.For example, the anterior edge length is shorter than the posterior edge length. If it becomes 3/4 (c/d=
1.33), deformation of the cuneiform vertebral body is already recognized, but it may not necessarily be recognized as a clear cuneiform vertebra. On the other hand, the leading edge length is 2/3 of the trailing edge length.
(c/d=1.50), it is clearly recognized as cuneiform vertebrae, so c/d≧1.40
was used as the criteria for determining cuneiform vertebrae. In addition to the so-called cuneiform vertebrae, there are other types of cuneiform vertebrae, such as upper edge compression fractures, upper edge depression fractures, lower edge compression fractures, and lower edge depression fractures, resulting in cuneiform vertebrae and anterior edge depression. This includes deformation where the length becomes shorter, and as described later, a<-2σ, c<-
Even in vertebral bodies judged to be flat vertebrae with 2σ, d<-1.5σ, the deformation of the anterior edge is particularly marked, and c/d
If ≧1.40 is satisfied, it can also be determined as cuneiform vertebrae. (C) When c/d is c/d≦0.70, it can be determined as “reverse cuneiform vertebrae” (type). In reverse cuneiform vertebrae, the anterior edge length d is smaller than the posterior edge length c due to deformation of the anterior edge part of the cuneiform vertebrae, whereas the anterior edge length d is smaller than the posterior edge length c due to the deformation of the posterior cuneiform vertebrae. It is defined as a vertebral body whose posterior edge length c is smaller than that of the vertebral body (see Fig. 3), but in reality, such a vertebral body hardly exists. Fifth
In the lumbar vertebrae, as shown in Example 1, the posterior edge length c is smaller than the anterior edge length d, and the average value of c/d is 0.95, which is less than 1. However, the posterior edge length c is smaller than the anterior edge length. When it becomes 3/4 of d (c/d=0.75)
However, there are cases where it is not clearly recognized as a reverse cuneiform vertebrae, and therefore, if c/d≦0.70, it can be determined to be a reverse cuneiform vertebrae (type). (D) If c, d, and c/d satisfy the following conditions, it can be determined as a "flat vertebrae" (type). (a) c<-2σ (b) d<-1.5σ (c) 0.70<c/d<1.40 The first condition (a) and the second condition (b) are when the trailing edge length c and the leading edge length d are When the average value of an undeformed vertebral body is taken as and, both -2σ and -1.5σ are smaller, that is, c<-2σ and d<
−1.5σ. A flat vertebra is a vertebral body whose anterior edge, center, and posterior edge are compressed and deformed relatively uniformly (see Figure 3); that is, the anterior edge length d, the median length a, and the posterior edge c are , both are getting smaller. As shown by the average length of each part of an undeformed vertebral body in Example 1, even in an undeformed vertebral body, the median length a
is smaller than the anterior edge length d and the posterior edge length c, so the characteristic of flat vertebrae is that the anterior edge length d and the posterior edge length c are particularly small, and c<-
A vertebral body with 2σ and d<−1.5σ is determined to be a flat vertebra (type). Note that c is −2σ,
The reason why d is set to -1.5σ is because c> as shown in Example 1, so by setting such conditions, c and d become approximately equal values, satisfying the conditions for a flat vertebra. This is because it becomes like that. The second condition (c) is 0.70<c/d<
It is 1.40. a<-2σ, c<-2σ, d<
Even in the case of d-1.5σ, if the deformation of the anterior edge is significant and c/d≧1.40, it is determined to be a cuneiform vertebrae, as described above, and if the deformation of the posterior edge is significant and c/d≦0.70. This is because in some cases, it is determined that the vertebrae are inverted cuneiform. (E) “Fish vertebrae” (type) when c/d, c, d, a/c, a/d satisfy the following conditions.
It can be determined that (a) 0.70<c/d<1.40 (b) At least one of c<-2σ, d<-1.5σ is satisfied (c) a/c≦0.80 and a/d≦0.80 “Fish A "vertebral body" is a vertebral body in which a depression fracture or compression fracture has occurred in the central part, and the central length a is particularly small compared to the anterior edge length d and the posterior edge length c (see Figure 3). . Therefore, among the so-called "no deformation" vertebrae, excluding cuneiform vertebrae, flattened vertebrae, and inverted cuneiform vertebrae, the median length a is particularly small. leading edge length a,
The median length a is smaller than the trailing edge length c,
When a/c<0.90 and a/d<0.90,
A fish-like deformity is already recognized, but it may not always be clearly recognized as a fish vertebra, and a/
c<0.80 and a/d<0.80 can be used as criteria for determining fish vertebrae. In addition to the so-called fish vertebrae, there are other types of fish vertebrae, such as upper edge compression fractures, upper edge depression fractures, lower edge compression fractures, and lower edge depression fractures, resulting in fish-like, centrally It includes a deformation in which the length is shortened. The criteria for determining "no change,""cuneiformvertebrae,""reverse cuneiform vertebrae,""flatvertebrae," and "fish vertebrae" have been described above, and the relationship between these criteria is shown in FIG. In the above-mentioned judgment, as a preferable example, the c/d judgment criteria is an upper limit of 1.4 and a lower limit of 0.70.
have been selected for explanation, but these values can be arbitrarily selected from the range of 1.25 to 1.55, for example, in the case of the upper limit. It can be selected preferably from the range of 1.33 to 1.50, more preferably from 1.40 to 1.45. The lower limit can be arbitrarily selected from the range of usually 0.80 to 0.60, preferably 0.75 to 0.65. As the criterion for a/c and a/d, we chose 0.8 for "no deformity" and "fish vertebrae"; this value is
It can be arbitrarily selected from the range of usually 0.65 to 0.90, preferably 0.70 to 0.85, and more preferably 0.75 to 0.80. As the criteria for c and d, we chose -2σ and -1.5σ in the cases of "no deformity", "flat vertebrae", and "fish vertebrae", but the criteria for c are usually -1.0σ ~
It can be arbitrarily selected from the range of c-2.5σ, preferably -1.25σ to -2.25σ, particularly preferably -1.5σ to -2.0σ. Similarly, the criterion for d is usually −1.0σ to −2.5σ, preferably −1.25σ
~−2.25σ, particularly preferably −1.5σ to −2.0σ
can be arbitrarily selected from the range. <Effects of the Invention> According to the method for evaluating X-ray photographic images of the present invention, the type of vertebral body deformation can be objectively evaluated, and changes in the deformation type and progression of vertebral body deformation over time can be evaluated. can also be determined. It is also very useful for controlling the progression of bone diseases such as osteoporosis and confirming therapeutic effects. <Example> Example 1 From a lateral X-ray image of the thoracolumbar vertebrae centered on the 8th thoracic vertebrae and 3rd lumbar vertebrae of a woman aged 50 to 75, the anterior edge length d, median length a, and posterior length of each vertebral body were determined. The edge length c and the vertebral body width b were measured, and for the vertebral bodies that were determined to be "no change" by the doctor, the measured values of a, b, c, d and c/
The average value ( ) and standard deviation (α) of the calculated values of d for each vertebral body are as shown in Table 1.
【表】【table】
【表】
実施例 2
70才の骨粗鬆症患者(女性)の胸腰椎の側面X
線像より、各椎体の中央長a、椎体長b、後縁長
c、前縁長dを計測しc/d、a/c、a/dを
計算して、各椎体の変形の有無並びに変化のタイ
プを判定した結果を第2表に示す。なお、判定
は、第2図に示す判定基準により行つた。以下、
実施例3並びに4も同じ。[Table] Example 2 Side view of thoracolumbar vertebrae of a 70-year-old osteoporotic patient (female)
From the line image, measure the median length a, vertebral body length b, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d of each vertebral body, calculate c/d, a/c, and a/d, and calculate the deformation of each vertebral body. Table 2 shows the results of determining the presence or absence and type of change. Note that the determination was made based on the criteria shown in FIG. below,
The same applies to Examples 3 and 4.
【表】
実施例 3
59才〜76才の骨粗鬆症患者(女性)10名の第3
腰椎を中心とする側面X線像より、第3腰椎の中
央長a、椎体幅b、後縁長c、前縁長dを計測
し、c/d、a/c、a/dを計算して、変形の
有無並びに変形のタイプを判定した結果を第3表
に示す。[Table] Example 3 The third sample of 10 osteoporosis patients (female) aged 59 to 76 years
Measure the median length a, vertebral body width b, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d of the third lumbar vertebra from a lateral X-ray image centered on the lumbar vertebrae, and calculate c/d, a/c, and a/d. Table 3 shows the results of determining the presence or absence of deformation and the type of deformation.
【表】
実施例 4
67才の骨粗鬆症患者(女性)第8胸椎並びに第
3腰椎を中心とする側面X線像より、第6胸椎か
ら第5腰椎までの中央長a、椎体幅b、後縁長
c、前縁長dを計測し、c/d、a/c、a/d
を計算して変形の有無並びに変形タイプを判定し
た後、6ケ月後に、再び同一部位の側面X線像を
撮影して同様の方法で変形の有無並びに変形タイ
プを判定すると共に、a,b,c,dの変化率を
計算した結果を第4表に示す。[Table] Example 4 A 67-year-old osteoporotic patient (female). From a lateral X-ray image centered on the 8th thoracic vertebrae and 3rd lumbar vertebrae, the median length a, vertebral body width b, and rear from the 6th thoracic vertebrae to the 5th lumbar vertebrae. Measure the edge length c and leading edge length d, c/d, a/c, a/d
After calculating the presence or absence of deformation and determining the type of deformation, 6 months later, a lateral X-ray image of the same region was taken again and the presence or absence of deformation and the type of deformation were determined using the same method, and a, b, Table 4 shows the results of calculating the rates of change in c and d.
【表】【table】
【表】
第2腰椎は、6か月間に「変化なし」から、タ
イプ(扁平椎)に変化している。
明らかな変形には到らなかつたが、第7胸椎の
前縁、後縁、第10胸椎の中央が、悪化の傾向にあ
る。又、第10胸椎並びに第3腰椎の中央も更に悪
化している。
一方、第6、第8、第9、第11、第12胸椎、第
4、第5腰椎には、殆んど変化は認められない。[Table] The second lumbar vertebrae changed from "no change" to type (flat vertebrae) over the course of 6 months. Although there was no obvious deformity, the anterior and posterior edges of the 7th thoracic vertebrae, and the center of the 10th thoracic vertebrae tended to deteriorate. In addition, the center of the 10th thoracic vertebrae and 3rd lumbar vertebrae have also deteriorated further. On the other hand, almost no changes were observed in the 6th, 8th, 9th, 11th, and 12th thoracic vertebrae, and the 4th and 5th lumbar vertebrae.
第1図は、椎体の側面X線像を示したものであ
り、第2図は、本発明のX線写真像の評価方法に
よる各椎体変形と前縁長d、後縁長c等との関係
を示したものであり、第3図は椎体変形の例を示
したものである。
Figure 1 shows a lateral X-ray image of the vertebral body, and Figure 2 shows the deformation of each vertebral body, anterior edge length d, posterior edge length c, etc., according to the method of evaluating X-ray images of the present invention. FIG. 3 shows an example of vertebral body deformation.
Claims (1)
長c、及び前縁長dを計測し、更にc/d、a/
c及びa/dの比を求め、これらc,d、c/
d、a/cおよびa/dより、椎体の変形の類別
を判定することを特徴とする椎体変形判定のため
のX線写真像の評価方法。1 From the lateral X-ray image of the vertebral body, measure the median length a, posterior edge length c, and anterior edge length d, and further calculate c/d, a/
Find the ratio of c and a/d, and calculate these c, d, c/
1. A method for evaluating an X-ray photographic image for determining vertebral body deformation, comprising determining the type of vertebral body deformation based on d, a/c, and a/d.
Priority Applications (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP10319886A JPS62261344A (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1986-05-07 | Method for judging deformation of vertebral body |
| DE87304069T DE3788299T2 (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1987-05-07 | Method and device for assessing spinal deformity. |
| EP87304069A EP0245098B1 (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1987-05-07 | Method and apparatus for judging deformation of vertebral body |
| US07/873,900 US5224035A (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1992-04-24 | Method and apparatus for judging deformation of vertebral body |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP10319886A JPS62261344A (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1986-05-07 | Method for judging deformation of vertebral body |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS62261344A JPS62261344A (en) | 1987-11-13 |
| JPH0340612B2 true JPH0340612B2 (en) | 1991-06-19 |
Family
ID=14347820
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP10319886A Granted JPS62261344A (en) | 1986-05-07 | 1986-05-07 | Method for judging deformation of vertebral body |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS62261344A (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4935727B2 (en) * | 2008-03-18 | 2012-05-23 | コニカミノルタエムジー株式会社 | Image measuring apparatus, medical image system, and program |
| JP5751462B2 (en) * | 2010-04-19 | 2015-07-22 | 国立大学法人 東京大学 | Spine disease diagnosis support device and spine disease diagnosis support program |
| WO2023195242A1 (en) * | 2022-04-04 | 2023-10-12 | 株式会社島津製作所 | X-ray image processing device, x-ray image processing method, and program |
-
1986
- 1986-05-07 JP JP10319886A patent/JPS62261344A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS62261344A (en) | 1987-11-13 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Greenspan et al. | Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis | |
| Prommersberger et al. | Rotational deformity in malunited fractures of the distal radius | |
| Manns et al. | The relative contribution of disc and vertebral morphometry to the angle of kyphosis in asymptomatic subjects | |
| Sandor et al. | Compact and trabecular components of the spine using quantitative computed tomography | |
| Mundinger et al. | Quantitative image analysis of vertebral body architecture—improved diagnosis in osteoporosis based on high-resolution computed tomography | |
| Garton et al. | Can radiologists detect osteopenia on plain radiographs? | |
| Adami et al. | Bone measurements in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism | |
| Kudlacek et al. | Gender differences in fracture risk and bone mineral density | |
| Bahşi et al. | Anatomical evaluation of the foramen magnum on cone-beam computed tomography images and review of literature | |
| RUPICH et al. | Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study | |
| Van Schaik et al. | Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics | |
| Izatt et al. | CT and radiographic analysis of sagittal profile changes following thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis surgery | |
| Gribova et al. | Is there a difference in orbital volume between affected and unaffected sides in patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia? | |
| Duboeuf et al. | A comparison of bone densitometry measurements of the central skeleton in post-menopausal women with and without vertebral fracture | |
| Edmondston et al. | The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral body shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: an in vitro study | |
| Elrakhawy et al. | Lumbar vertebral canal stenosis: concept of morphometric and radiometric study of the human lumbar vertebral canal | |
| Alpaydin et al. | Evaluation of mandibular osseous structure in patients with mandibular asymmetry: a fractal analysis study | |
| JPH0340612B2 (en) | ||
| Sirvanci et al. | Pedicular stress fracture in lumbar spine | |
| Tolk et al. | The development of leg length difference and influence on persistent dysplasia in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip | |
| Link et al. | Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri-and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis | |
| Lynch et al. | Computed tomography in spinal trauma | |
| Tanno et al. | Age-related changes in cortical and trabecular bone mineral status: A quantitative CT study in lumbar vertebrae | |
| Gordillo et al. | Radiographic Indicators of Craniocervical Instability: Analyzing Variance of Normative Supine and Upright Imaging in a Healthy Population | |
| Griffith et al. | Imaging of Osteoporosis |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |