JPH0365412B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0365412B2
JPH0365412B2 JP4039884A JP4039884A JPH0365412B2 JP H0365412 B2 JPH0365412 B2 JP H0365412B2 JP 4039884 A JP4039884 A JP 4039884A JP 4039884 A JP4039884 A JP 4039884A JP H0365412 B2 JPH0365412 B2 JP H0365412B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
iron ore
weight
curing
strength
molded product
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP4039884A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS60184642A (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP4039884A priority Critical patent/JPS60184642A/en
Publication of JPS60184642A publication Critical patent/JPS60184642A/en
Publication of JPH0365412B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0365412B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

<技術分野> 本発明は鉄鉱石粉末又は酸化鉄粉末を高炉で製
銑する際高炉装入時の粉末の飛散を防止し且つ炉
内の通気性を保持して精錬反応を円滑に進行せし
めるための原料鉄鉱石粉末の予備処理に関する。 <従来技術> 近年は出銑比の増大あるいはコークス比の低減
等の要請から高炉に装入する鉄鉱石の粒度が更に
小さくなる傾向にある事、富鉱の涸渇化による低
品位鉱の利用の必要性から粉鉱石の取り扱い量が
増大している事、また製銑工場での粉塵公害防止
のためダストの回収が強化されている事、等のた
めに鉄鉱石粉末の使用量は益々増加する傾向にあ
る。これらの鉄鉱石粉末をそのまま高炉に装入す
ると、通気性の不良や不均一、ガス灰発生量の増
加、および荷下りの不良等を生じ、コークス比の
増大あるいは出銑比の低下等高炉の操業に著るし
い悪影響を及ぼすため鉄鉱石粉末は適当な方法で
塊成化して用いる必要がある。 鉄鉱石粉末又は酸化鉄粉末などの原料を塊成化
する方法として現在工業的に実施されているもの
には次の方法がある。 (1) 焼結法 約5mm以下の鉄鉱石粉末に適当な粒度のコー
クスと必要に応じて石炭石粉末とを混合し、格
子上で1200〜1400℃の温度下にて焼成し、鉄鉱
石の一部を溶融させて焼結させ、冷却後破砕し
て適当な粒とする方法。 (2) ペレツタイジング−焼成法 微粉砕した鉄鉱石粉末に適当量の水分および
必要に応じてベントナイト、石炭等を加え回転
ドラム、回転皿等を用いて造粒しその後ロータ
リーキルンで焼成し焼結させて充分な強度を得
る方法。 (3) ペレタイジング−冷間硬化法 俗にコールドボンド法と言われるもので微粉
砕した鉄鉱石粉末とポルトランドセメントある
いはポルトランドセメントクリンカー粉末の混
合物に適当量の水分を加えて、回転ドラムある
いは回転皿などを用いて造粒しその後養生して
充分な強度を得る方法。 以上の3法に大別されるが、(1)および(2)の方法
は何れも鉄鉱石粉末の粒状物あるいはペレツトに
強度を付与させるため、何等かの方法でこれらの
粒状物あるいはペレツトを焼成している。この焼
成には大規模な設備を必要とするばかりでなく、
焼成炉より発生するSOx、NOxあるいは粉塵等
が公害源になるという問題がある。このため非焼
成の塊成化方法として上記(3)の方法が開発されて
いるが、上記(3)の方法には次のような欠点があり
未だ充分ではない。 (イ) 強度発現までに長期間(通常7〜10日)を要
するために大規模な養生設備を必要とする。 (ロ) ペレツトは球状であるため安息角が小さく、
高炉に投入した時炉の中央部に偏在するため高
炉操業が著るしく不安定になる。これを避ける
ために使用量が非常に少量に限定される(通常
10〜20重量%)。 (ハ) 充分な強度を達成させるにはセメントを多量
(通常7%以上)に添加する必要があるため、
高炉の操業中にスラグ比が高くなるため、出銑
比、コークス比および炉前作業性等が悪くな
る。 (ニ) ペレツトは球状且つトポ化学的に還元反応が
進行するため内部に未還元FeOが残留し易い。 (ホ) 製造過程で原料の鉄鉱石を微粉砕する必要が
あるため、粉砕動力費が高い。 <発明の目的> 本発明は予じめ焼結する事なしに成形後短時間
で強度を発現すると共に耐水性を有しそして高炉
中での被還元性に優れ、且つ鉄鉱石粉末が溶融温
度に達するまで自形を保持するに充分な強度を有
する非焼成塊成鉱を簡単な設備で製造する方法を
提供することを目的とする。 <発明の構成> 上記目的を達成するため、本発明の構成は、鉄
鉱石粉末、セメントおよび水の混合物を加圧成形
ロールによりフレーク状に圧縮成形した後、養生
することを特徴とする。 本発明で使用する鉄鉱石粉末はヘマタイト系、
マグネタイト系およびリモナイト系いずれでも良
く、又使用するセメントはポルトランドセメン
ト、混合セメント、アルミナセメントあるいはポ
ルトランドセメントクリンカー粉末いずれでも使
用出来る。 鉄鉱石粉末の粒度は、使用するロール成形機の
ロール間隙より小さいほうが良く、通常5mm以下
が好ましい。 次にバインダーとして鉄鉱石粉末に添加される
セメントの添加量は少量な程好ましいが、2重量
%以下では冷間落下強度が小さくなるため好まし
くなく、又8重量%以上ではこれ以上添加しても
強度はそれ程向上せず従つて添加量としては2重
量%以上8重量%未満が好ましい。 鉄鉱石粉末、セメントおよび水の混合は、鉄鉱
石の粉砕時に混合しても良く、又通常のコンクリ
ートミキサー等により混合しても良い。 鉄鉱石粉末とセメントの混合物への水の添加量
は、鉄鉱石粉末の粉末度により変化するが、通常
4重量%以上〜8重量%未満が好ましい、4重量
%以下では非焼成塊成鉱の冷間落下強度が小さ
く、また8重量%以上では添加した水量が成形時
に成形物の系外に滲みだすため好ましくない。 一対の加圧成形ロールにより上記混合原料を圧
縮成形すると、成形物はフレーク状に連続して製
造される。又ロール間隙を変化する事によりフレ
ークの厚さがコントロール出来る。フレークの厚
さは6mm以上15mm未満が好ましい、6mm以下では
冷間落下強度が小さく、一方15mm以上では非焼成
塊成鉱の被還元性状が不良となるので各々好まし
くない。 成形物は必要に応じ解砕機により所定の粒径、
通常10〜50mmまで解砕された後、養生される。成
形物の養生は、1日以内の養生で高炉に装入する
場合には蒸気養生が良く、又、1日以上養生する
場合には常温養生でも良い。尚、蒸気養生あるい
は常温養生いずれの場合も養生後100℃以上で強
制乾燥処理すると良い。強制乾燥により成形物の
強度が増加し、又高炉へ侵入する水分量も減少で
きるので好ましい。 <発明の効果> 以上説明した本発明によれば次の利点がある。 イ 鉄鉱石粉末を冷間で塊成化するため、SOx、
NOxおよび粉塵等に対する大気汚染防止対策
が必要ない。 ロ フレーク状として製造されるため、従来の非
焼成ペレツトよりも安息角が大きく高炉投入時
の偏在現象が防止できる。 ハ 従来の非焼成ペレツトよりも養生時間を著る
しく短縮出来る。 ニ 従来の非焼成ペレツトよりもセメント使用量
を減少出来、高炉操業時のスラグ比を抑制でき
る。 ホ 従来の非焼成ペレツトよりも粉砕動力費を低
減出来る。 ヘ 被還元性にすぐれ、製錬効果が向上する。 <実験例> 以下に本発明の実験例を示す。 実験例 1 105℃で乾燥しその後1mm以下に粉砕したブラ
ジルリオドセ産鉄鉱石(ヘマタイト系)粉末に早
強ポルトランドセメントを1重量%〜10重量%添
加混合したものを1水準各150Kg調製した。その
後混合物100重量部と水6重量部をコンクリート
ミキサーで混合し、一対の加圧成形用ロールでフ
レーク状に圧縮成形した。成形物を20℃相対湿度
80%以上で1日および7日養生した後JIS M8711
に準じて落下強度を測定し第1図の結果を得た。 尚、ロールの成形条件は以下の通りである。 ロール径:450mm ロール巾:300mm 成形圧:800〜1000Kg/cm2 ロール回転数:2rpm フレーク厚さ:10mm 第1図から明らかなように鉄鉱石粉末へのセメ
ントの添加量は2重量%〜8重量%が好ましいこ
とが解る。 実験例 2 実施例1で使用したリオドセ産鉄鉱石粉末94重
量部、早強ポルトランドセメント6重量部および
水を5重量部をパグミルで混合した後実験例1で
使用したと同じロール機を使用し、ロール間隙を
変更して種々の厚さのフレークを成形した。フレ
ークを常温で1日養生後JIS M8711に準じて落下
強度を、JIS M8713に準じて最終還元率を測定し
第2図、第3図の結果を得た。 第2図および第3図から成形されるフレークの
厚さは6mm以上15mm以下が好ましい事が解る。即
ち6mm以下の時は落下強度が小さく、又15mm以上
の時はフレークの被還元生が不良となるため好ま
しくない。 実験例 3 オーストラリアハマスレー産鉄鉱石(ヘマタイ
ト系)を5mm以下に粉砕しその後普通ポルトラン
ドセメントを6wt%、水を6wt%添加しパグミル
で混合した後、実験例−1で使用した成形ロール
機で圧縮成形した。フレークを種々の条件で養生
しその後安息角、落下強度、最終還元率及び最大
圧損値を測定し表−1〜表−4の結果を得た。 比較のためブリケツトマシン成形物および非焼
成ペレツト(普通ポルトランドセメント10wt%
をハマスレー鉄鉱石に添加した後88μふるい残分
1.2%に粉砕し皿型造粒機で13〜15mm径に造粒)
についても調製して試験した。
<Technical field> The present invention is aimed at preventing scattering of the powder when charging iron ore powder or iron oxide powder in a blast furnace, and maintaining air permeability in the furnace to allow the refining reaction to proceed smoothly. Regarding the preliminary treatment of raw material iron ore powder. <Prior art> In recent years, the grain size of iron ore charged into blast furnaces has tended to become smaller due to demands such as increasing the pig iron production ratio or reducing the coke ratio. The amount of iron ore powder used will continue to increase due to the increasing amount of iron ore handled due to necessity, and the strengthening of dust collection to prevent dust pollution at pig iron factories. There is a tendency. If these iron ore powders are charged into a blast furnace as they are, they will cause poor and uneven ventilation, an increase in the amount of gas ash generated, and poor unloading. Iron ore powder must be agglomerated using an appropriate method because it has a significant negative impact on operations. The following methods are currently used industrially to agglomerate raw materials such as iron ore powder or iron oxide powder. (1) Sintering method Iron ore powder of approximately 5 mm or less is mixed with coke of an appropriate particle size and coal stone powder as needed, and fired on a grid at a temperature of 1,200 to 1,400°C to sinter the iron ore. A method of melting a portion, sintering it, cooling it and then crushing it into suitable particles. (2) Pelletizing - Calcining method An appropriate amount of water and, if necessary, bentonite, coal, etc. are added to finely ground iron ore powder, and the pellets are granulated using a rotating drum, rotating plate, etc., and then fired and sintered in a rotary kiln. How to obtain sufficient strength by (3) Pelletizing - Cold hardening method A suitable amount of water is added to a mixture of finely pulverized iron ore powder and Portland cement or Portland cement clinker powder using what is commonly called the cold bond method. A method of obtaining sufficient strength by granulating and then curing. These methods can be roughly divided into the three methods mentioned above, but methods (1) and (2) both involve adding strength to the iron ore powder granules or pellets by using some method. It is being fired. This firing not only requires large-scale equipment, but also
There is a problem that SOx, NOx, dust, etc. generated from the kiln become a source of pollution. For this reason, the method (3) above has been developed as a non-fired agglomeration method, but the method (3) has the following drawbacks and is still not sufficient. (b) It takes a long time (usually 7 to 10 days) to develop strength, so large-scale curing equipment is required. (b) Since pellets are spherical, their angle of repose is small;
When it is introduced into the blast furnace, it is unevenly distributed in the center of the furnace, making blast furnace operation extremely unstable. To avoid this, the amount used is limited to very small amounts (usually
10-20% by weight). (c) It is necessary to add a large amount of cement (usually 7% or more) to achieve sufficient strength.
Since the slag ratio increases during operation of the blast furnace, the tap ratio, coke ratio, furnace front workability, etc. deteriorate. (d) Since the pellets are spherical and the reduction reaction proceeds topochemically, unreduced FeO tends to remain inside the pellets. (e) Since the raw material iron ore needs to be pulverized in the manufacturing process, the power cost for pulverization is high. <Objective of the invention> The present invention develops strength in a short period of time after forming without sintering in advance, has water resistance, has excellent reducibility in a blast furnace, and has iron ore powder at a melting temperature. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for producing uncalcined agglomerated ore having sufficient strength to maintain its shape until it reaches . <Structure of the Invention> In order to achieve the above object, the structure of the present invention is characterized in that a mixture of iron ore powder, cement, and water is compressed into flakes using a pressure forming roll, and then cured. The iron ore powder used in the present invention is hematite-based,
Either magnetite-based or limonite-based cement may be used, and the cement used may be portland cement, mixed cement, alumina cement, or portland cement clinker powder. The particle size of the iron ore powder is preferably smaller than the roll gap of the roll forming machine used, and is usually preferably 5 mm or less. Next, the smaller the amount of cement added to the iron ore powder as a binder, the better; however, if it is less than 2% by weight, the cold drop strength will decrease, and if it is less than 2% by weight, it is not preferable, and if it is more than 8% by weight, it may not be added. The strength is not improved so much, so the amount added is preferably 2% by weight or more and less than 8% by weight. The iron ore powder, cement, and water may be mixed at the time of crushing the iron ore, or may be mixed using an ordinary concrete mixer or the like. The amount of water added to the mixture of iron ore powder and cement varies depending on the fineness of the iron ore powder, but it is usually preferably 4% by weight or more and less than 8% by weight. The cold drop strength is low, and if it exceeds 8% by weight, the amount of water added will leak out of the molded product during molding, which is not preferable. When the mixed raw material is compression molded using a pair of pressure molding rolls, a molded product is continuously produced in the form of flakes. Also, the thickness of the flakes can be controlled by changing the roll gap. The thickness of the flakes is preferably 6 mm or more and less than 15 mm. If it is less than 6 mm, the cold drop strength will be low, while if it is more than 15 mm, the reducibility of the uncalcined agglomerate will be poor, so these are not preferred. The molded product is crushed to a predetermined particle size using a crusher as necessary.
It is usually crushed to 10 to 50 mm and then cured. For curing of the molded product, steam curing is preferable when charging the molded product into a blast furnace after curing for less than one day, and room temperature curing may be used when curing for more than one day. In addition, in either case of steam curing or room temperature curing, it is preferable to perform forced drying at 100°C or higher after curing. Forced drying is preferred because it increases the strength of the molded product and also reduces the amount of moisture entering the blast furnace. <Effects of the Invention> The present invention described above has the following advantages. B. Because iron ore powder is cold agglomerated, SOx,
There is no need to take measures to prevent air pollution such as NOx and dust. Since it is manufactured in the form of flakes, it has a larger angle of repose than conventional unfired pellets, and can prevent uneven distribution during charging into the blast furnace. c) The curing time can be significantly shortened compared to conventional non-fired pellets. D. The amount of cement used can be reduced compared to conventional unfired pellets, and the slag ratio during blast furnace operation can be suppressed. E) Grinding power costs can be reduced compared to conventional non-fired pellets. F. It has excellent reducibility and improves the smelting effect. <Experimental Examples> Experimental examples of the present invention are shown below. Experimental Example 1 One level of 150 kg of iron ore (hematite type) powder from Rio Doce, Brazil, which had been dried at 105°C and then ground to 1 mm or less, was mixed with 1% to 10% by weight of early-strength Portland cement. Thereafter, 100 parts by weight of the mixture and 6 parts by weight of water were mixed using a concrete mixer, and compression molded into flakes using a pair of pressure molding rolls. Moldings at 20℃ relative humidity
JIS M8711 after curing for 1 day and 7 days at 80% or more
The drop strength was measured according to the method and the results shown in Figure 1 were obtained. The conditions for forming the roll are as follows. Roll diameter: 450mm Roll width: 300mm Molding pressure: 800-1000Kg/cm 2- roll rotation speed: 2rpm Flake thickness: 10mm As is clear from Figure 1, the amount of cement added to iron ore powder is 2% by weight to 8%. It turns out that weight % is preferred. Experimental Example 2 After mixing 94 parts by weight of Riodoce iron ore powder used in Example 1, 6 parts by weight of early-strength Portland cement, and 5 parts by weight of water in a pug mill, the same roll machine as used in Experimental Example 1 was used. , flakes of various thicknesses were formed by changing the roll gap. After curing the flakes for one day at room temperature, the falling strength was measured according to JIS M8711, and the final reduction rate was measured according to JIS M8713, and the results shown in Figures 2 and 3 were obtained. It can be seen from FIGS. 2 and 3 that the thickness of the molded flakes is preferably 6 mm or more and 15 mm or less. That is, when it is less than 6 mm, the drop strength is low, and when it is more than 15 mm, the reduced quality of the flakes becomes poor, which is not preferable. Experimental Example 3 Iron ore (hematite type) from Hamasley, Australia was crushed to 5 mm or less, then 6wt% of ordinary Portland cement and 6wt% of water were added, mixed in a pug mill, and then crushed in the forming roll machine used in Experimental Example-1. Compression molded. The flakes were cured under various conditions, and then the angle of repose, falling strength, final reduction rate, and maximum pressure drop value were measured, and the results shown in Tables 1 to 4 were obtained. For comparison, briquette machine molded products and unfired pellets (ordinary Portland cement 10wt%)
88μ sieve residue after adding to Hammersley iron ore
Grind to 1.2% and granulate into 13-15mm diameter using a dish granulator)
were also prepared and tested.

【表】 本発明によるロール成形は製品収率が著るしく
高い事が明らかである。
[Table] It is clear that the roll forming according to the present invention has a significantly higher product yield.

【表】 数発生しているため試験を中止した。
表−2から本発明のロールによる圧縮成形物は
冷間落下強度が、他の成形物に較べ著るしく大で
ある事が解る。 一方ブリケツトマシンによる成形物は促進養生
あるいは長期養生の効果が小さい。これは成形圧
力が成形物に均一に作用しないために生じる成形
物の不均一性が養生により解消されないためと考
えられる。 又、皿型造粒物の非焼成ペレツトは95%の落下
強度を達成するには常温7時間の養生を必要と
し、これを短縮するため80℃蒸気養生を3時間行
うと、表面にクラツクが発生し製品を損う問題が
ある。ところが本発明の成形物は80℃蒸気養生3
時間により落下強度が91%に達し、短時間の強度
発現が可能である。
[Table] The test was discontinued due to several occurrences.
From Table 2, it can be seen that the cold drop strength of the roll compression molded product of the present invention is significantly higher than that of other molded products. On the other hand, the effect of accelerated curing or long-term curing is small for molded products made using a briquette machine. This is thought to be because the non-uniformity of the molded product caused by the molding pressure not acting uniformly on the molded product is not eliminated by curing. In addition, unfired pellets made of dish-shaped granules require 7 hours of curing at room temperature to achieve 95% drop strength.To shorten this time, steam curing at 80℃ for 3 hours results in cracks on the surface. There are problems that can occur and damage the product. However, the molded product of the present invention is steam cured at 80°C.
Over time, the drop strength reaches 91%, making it possible to develop strength in a short period of time.

【表】 次に被還元性についてみると、ブリケツトマシ
ン成形物あるいは従来の皿型造粒物に比べ、本発
明に係る成形物の被還元率は、表−3から明らか
なように最終還元率95%であり大幅に向上してい
ることが判る。これは本発明の成形物はフレーク
状をなし、その厚みが10mmと薄いため内部まで還
元反応が進行した結果であると考えられる。又本
発明の成形物のふくれ指数も従来のものと同等で
あり、この点の不都合もないことが判る。
[Table] Next, looking at the reducibility, compared to the briquette machine molded product or the conventional dish-shaped granulated product, the final reduction rate of the molded product according to the present invention is as clear from Table 3. It can be seen that it is 95%, which is a significant improvement. This is thought to be due to the fact that the molded product of the present invention has a flake shape and is as thin as 10 mm, so that the reduction reaction progresses to the inside. Moreover, the swelling index of the molded product of the present invention is also the same as that of the conventional molded product, and it can be seen that there are no disadvantages in this respect.

【表】 筒を引き抜いた後の安息角を測定した。
更に本発明の成形物と比較例の成形物について
安息角を測定した。この結果を表4に示す。表−
4から明らかなように本発明の成形物の安息角は
従来の成形物の安息角に比べ大きく、高炉に装入
した際好都合であることが判る。 実験例 4 カナダタツス産鉄鉱石(マグネタイト系)を1
mm以下に粉砕し普通ポルトランドセメントを7重
量%コークス粉を5重量%添加混合した後混合物
100重量部に対して6重量部の水を添加しパグミ
ルで混合した後実験例1で使用したロール成形機
を使用し成形圧1500Kg/cm2で成形した。フレーク
の厚さは13mmであつた。成形物を常温1日養生、
80℃4時間蒸気養生および50℃4時間蒸気養生後
250℃で2時間乾燥の各々の水準で養生し、その
後JISに準じて冷間落下強度、最終還元率、ふく
れ指数を測定して表−5の結果を得た。
[Table] The angle of repose was measured after the cylinder was pulled out.
Furthermore, the angle of repose was measured for the molded product of the present invention and the molded product of the comparative example. The results are shown in Table 4. Table -
As is clear from 4, the angle of repose of the molded product of the present invention is larger than that of the conventional molded product, and it is found that it is convenient when charged into a blast furnace. Experimental example 4 1 iron ore (magnetite type) from Tatsusu, Canada
Mixed with 7% by weight of ordinary Portland cement and 5% by weight of coke powder after pulverized to less than mm.
6 parts by weight of water was added to 100 parts by weight, mixed in a pug mill, and then molded using the roll molding machine used in Experimental Example 1 at a molding pressure of 1500 kg/cm 2 . The thickness of the flakes was 13 mm. Curing the molded product at room temperature for 1 day,
After 4 hours of steam curing at 80℃ and 4 hours of steam curing at 50℃
After curing at each level of drying at 250°C for 2 hours, the cold drop strength, final reduction rate, and blistering index were measured according to JIS, and the results shown in Table 5 were obtained.

【表】 表−5から明らかなように本実験例においても
最終還元率はいずれも91〜92%であり、実験例−
3の場合と同様、従来のものより大きな被還元性
を示していることが判る。 実施例 5 オーストラリアローブリバー産鉄鉱石(リモナ
イト系)を3mm以下に粉砕しその後早強ポルトラ
ンドセメント25重量%、88μ全通石炭石粉5重量
%を添加し混合した後、混合物100重量部に対し
て水7重量部パグミルで混合した後、実験例1で
使用したロール成形機を使用し、成形圧500Kg/
cm2で成形した。フレーク厚さは8.0mmであつた。 成形物を常温1日養生、90℃2時間蒸気養生、
90℃2時間蒸気養生後200℃で2時間乾燥の各々
の水準で養生した後JISに準じて冷間落下強度、
最終還元率、およびふくれ指数を測定し表−6の
結果を得た。
[Table] As is clear from Table 5, the final reduction rate was 91 to 92% in all of the experimental examples.
As in case 3, it can be seen that the reducibility is greater than that of the conventional one. Example 5 Iron ore (limonite type) from Robe River, Australia was crushed to 3 mm or less, and then 25% by weight of early strength Portland cement and 5% by weight of 88μ solid coal powder were added and mixed, based on 100 parts by weight of the mixture. After mixing 7 parts by weight of water in a pug mill, using the roll forming machine used in Experimental Example 1, the molding pressure was 500 kg/
Molded in cm 2 . The flake thickness was 8.0 mm. Curing the molded product at room temperature for 1 day, steam curing at 90℃ for 2 hours,
After steam curing at 90℃ for 2 hours and drying at 200℃ for 2 hours, the cold drop strength was determined according to JIS.
The final reduction rate and blistering index were measured and the results shown in Table 6 were obtained.

【表】 表−6から明らかなように本実験例においても
最終還元率はいずれも95%〜96%であり、実験例
3の場合と同様、従来より大きな被還元性を示し
ていることが判る。又、蒸気養生により短期強度
の発現も可能であることが判る。
[Table] As is clear from Table 6, the final reduction rates in this experimental example were all 95% to 96%, and as in the case of Experimental Example 3, it can be seen that the reducibility is greater than that of the conventional example. I understand. It is also clear that short-term strength can be achieved by steam curing.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図ないし第3図は本発明の成形物に係り、
第1図はセメント添加量と落下強度との関係を示
すグラフ、第2図はフレーク厚さと落下強度との
関係を示すグラフ、第3図はフレーク厚さと最終
還元率との関係を示すグラフである。
1 to 3 relate to the molded product of the present invention,
Figure 1 is a graph showing the relationship between cement addition amount and falling strength, Figure 2 is a graph showing the relationship between flake thickness and falling strength, and Figure 3 is a graph showing the relationship between flake thickness and final reduction rate. be.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 鉄鉱石粉末、セメントおよび水の混合物を加
圧成形ロールによりフレーク状に圧縮成形した
後、養生することを特徴とする非焼成塊成鉱の製
造方法。 2 上記混合物においてセメントの添加量が2重
量%〜8重量%、水の添加量が4重量%〜8重量
%であることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項
記載の非焼成塊成鉱の製造方法。
[Scope of Claims] 1. A method for producing non-calcined agglomerate ore, which comprises compression molding a mixture of iron ore powder, cement and water into flakes using pressure molding rolls, and then curing the mixture. 2. The non-calcined agglomerated ore according to claim 1, characterized in that in the mixture, the amount of cement added is 2% to 8% by weight, and the amount of water added is 4% to 8% by weight. manufacturing method.
JP4039884A 1984-03-05 1984-03-05 Manufacture of unfired lump ore Granted JPS60184642A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4039884A JPS60184642A (en) 1984-03-05 1984-03-05 Manufacture of unfired lump ore

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP4039884A JPS60184642A (en) 1984-03-05 1984-03-05 Manufacture of unfired lump ore

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS60184642A JPS60184642A (en) 1985-09-20
JPH0365412B2 true JPH0365412B2 (en) 1991-10-11

Family

ID=12579558

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP4039884A Granted JPS60184642A (en) 1984-03-05 1984-03-05 Manufacture of unfired lump ore

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS60184642A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2654367B2 (en) * 1995-01-18 1997-09-17 株式会社クボタ Threshing equipment
JP2654371B2 (en) * 1995-02-17 1997-09-17 株式会社クボタ Threshing equipment
JP2011111662A (en) * 2009-11-30 2011-06-09 Jfe Steel Corp Method for producing molded raw material for producing reduced iron

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS60184642A (en) 1985-09-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPS6223944A (en) Refining method for nickel oxide or the like
CA1149617A (en) Porous iron ore pellets and process for manufacturing same
JP6900695B2 (en) Metal oxide smelting method
CN110788113B (en) Method for inhibiting zinc-containing dust pellets from reduction degradation in rotary hearth furnace
JP2009030115A (en) Production method of blast furnace ore raw material
JP4105856B2 (en) Reduced iron production method by rotary bed furnace
JP2009030114A (en) Production method of blast furnace ore raw material
JP2009030112A (en) Production method of blast furnace ore raw material
JPH1112624A (en) Forming method of reduced iron production raw material
JP5454505B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
JP5835144B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
JP5786668B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated mineral
JPH0660359B2 (en) Method for producing unfired agglomerated ore
JP2003301205A (en) Method for charging blast furnace material
JPH05263155A (en) Production of sintered or pelletized ore as blast-furnace material using lime cake
JP3837845B2 (en) Method for producing reduced iron
JPS5926651B2 (en) Method for manufacturing non-calcined agglomerate ore
KR100718581B1 (en) Pig iron substitute and its manufacturing method
JPS60184642A (en) Manufacture of unfired lump ore
JP2002241853A (en) Unfired agglomerate for blast furnace
JPH0742519B2 (en) Pretreatment method for raw material for blast furnace
JP5825180B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated ore for blast furnace using coal char
JP2003129140A (en) Manufacturing method of molded product for rotary hearth for reduction
JPH0364571B2 (en)
JP2009030116A (en) Production method of blast furnace ore raw material