JPH04124218A - Production of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in magnetic property - Google Patents

Production of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in magnetic property

Info

Publication number
JPH04124218A
JPH04124218A JP2240097A JP24009790A JPH04124218A JP H04124218 A JPH04124218 A JP H04124218A JP 2240097 A JP2240097 A JP 2240097A JP 24009790 A JP24009790 A JP 24009790A JP H04124218 A JPH04124218 A JP H04124218A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
rolling
temperature
silicon steel
hot
inhibitor
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP2240097A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0739610B2 (en
Inventor
Takashi Obara
隆史 小原
Fumihiko Takeuchi
竹内 文彦
Masahiko Manabe
真鍋 昌彦
Toshito Takamiya
俊人 高宮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Steel Corp filed Critical Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority to JP2240097A priority Critical patent/JPH0739610B2/en
Publication of JPH04124218A publication Critical patent/JPH04124218A/en
Publication of JPH0739610B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0739610B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Manufacturing Of Steel Electrode Plates (AREA)
  • Soft Magnetic Materials (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To attain the refining of crystalline structure and the proper dispersion of inhibitor and to produce a grain-oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in surface characteristics and magnetic properties by exerting the final pass of the hot roughing for a slab of silicon steel with limited composition under specific conditions. CONSTITUTION:A slab of a silicon steel having a composition containing, by weight, 0.05-0.09% C, 2.5-4.0% Si, 0.03-0.10% Mn, and 0.01-0.10% of one or more elements among S, Se, and Al is heated and subjected to hot roughing. At this time, the final pass of the hot roughing is exerted under the conditions of a temp. wherein the range of temp. difference between the outermost layer of the steel plate and the position at a depth one-fifth the plate thickness is 1200-1250 deg.C and a reduction of area of >=50%. After hot finish rolling succeeding to the above roughing, the plate is cold-rolled once or cold-rolled twice while process-annealed between the cold rolling stages to the final sheet thickness, and then, decarburizing annealing and final finish annealing are performed, by which the above steel sheet can be produced.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) この発明は、線状細粒か少なく磁気特性の優れた方向性
けい素鋼板の有利な製造方法に関するものである。
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION (Industrial Application Field) The present invention relates to an advantageous method for manufacturing a grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with few fine linear grains and excellent magnetic properties.

(従来の技術) 一方向性けい素鋼板は、主に変圧器や発電機の鉄心材料
として使用され、磁束密度が高く、かっ鉄損か低いこと
か必要とされる。
(Prior Art) Unidirectional silicon steel sheets are mainly used as core materials for transformers and generators, and are required to have high magnetic flux density and low iron loss.

ところで近年、省エネルギーに対する強い要請を反映し
て、特性の優れた方向性けい素鋼板の安価な供給か強く
望まれており、特性の安定化とくに特性を部分的に低下
させる線状細粒の低減と共に、製造コストを如何に低減
させるかが重要な課題となっている。
However, in recent years, reflecting the strong demand for energy conservation, there has been a strong demand for inexpensive supply of grain-oriented silicon steel sheets with excellent properties, and it is necessary to stabilize the properties, especially to reduce linear fine grains that partially degrade the properties. At the same time, how to reduce manufacturing costs has become an important issue.

磁気特性に優れた方向性けい素鋼板を得るには、基本的
に{110} <001>方位いわゆるゴス方位に高度
に集積した2次再結晶組織を得ることが必要である。ゴ
ス方位の2次再結晶粒を発達させるためには粒界移動を
適度に抑制する分散析出相いわゆるインヒビターの存在
か必要であり、かようなインヒビターとしてMnSe、
 MnSおよびAINなとか一般的に利用されている。
In order to obtain a grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties, it is basically necessary to obtain a secondary recrystallized structure highly concentrated in the {110} <001> orientation, the so-called Goss orientation. In order to develop secondary recrystallized grains with Goss orientation, it is necessary to have a dispersed precipitated phase, so-called inhibitor, which moderately suppresses grain boundary movement, and such inhibitors include MnSe,
MnS and AIN are commonly used.

この場合、熱延に先たつスラブ加熱時にMnSe、 M
nSなとを十分に解離固溶させた後、適切な条件で熱間
圧延についで冷却を行うことによって微細かつ均一に分
散析出させることか非常に重要であり、かかるMnSe
、 MnS等の固溶解離のためには高いスラブ加熱温度
か必要とされている。
In this case, MnSe, M
It is very important to sufficiently dissociate MnSe into a solid solution, then hot-roll it under appropriate conditions and then cool it to finely and uniformly disperse and precipitate it.
, A high slab heating temperature is required for solid dissociation of MnS, etc.

スラブを高温加熱すればインヒビターか十分に溶解し、
特性かある程度向上することは良く知られているところ
であって、この点に関しこれまで多大の努力か払われて
きた。しかしながら一方で、インヒビターを完全溶解さ
せるために、スラブを高温に長時間保持するとスラブ結
晶組織か極端に粗大化し、かかる不均一組織に起因して
2次再結晶不良が大なり小なり発生することも良く知ら
れている。とくに最近主流となっている結晶方位か高度
に揃った高磁束密度材を製造しようとする場合に、この
ような不均一組織の悪影響か殊の外太き(なる。このよ
うな欠陥は線状細粒とも呼はれ極力避けなけれはならな
い不良の−っである。
If the slab is heated to a high temperature, the inhibitor will be sufficiently dissolved.
It is well known that the properties can be improved to some extent, and a great deal of effort has been made in this regard. However, on the other hand, if the slab is kept at high temperature for a long time in order to completely dissolve the inhibitor, the crystal structure of the slab will become extremely coarse, and secondary recrystallization defects will occur to some extent due to such a non-uniform structure. is also well known. In particular, when trying to manufacture high magnetic flux density materials with highly aligned crystal orientations, which have become mainstream these days, the adverse effects of such non-uniform structures can be particularly pronounced. Also called fine particles, they are a defective substance that must be avoided as much as possible.

そこでスラブ鋳造組織を微細化する二とによって、長時
間加熱後のスラブ組織を効果的に小さくしようとする努
力もなされている。その代表的な技術として、特公昭5
2−19169号公報および特公昭57−41526号
公報等に開示の技術かある。例えは特公昭52−191
69号公報に開示された技術は、鋳込み温度を凝固温度
ぎりぎりまで近つけることにより、スラブの凝固組織の
中でとくに有害とされている柱状晶の比率を下げ、等細
菌化する方法である。
Therefore, efforts have been made to effectively reduce the size of the slab structure after long-term heating by refining the slab casting structure. As a representative technology,
There are techniques disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 2-19169 and Japanese Patent Publication No. 57-41526. For example, the special public official court 52-191
The technique disclosed in Publication No. 69 is a method of lowering the ratio of columnar crystals, which are considered to be particularly harmful, in the solidified structure of the slab by bringing the casting temperature close to the solidification temperature, thereby making the slab homobacterial.

この技術は、それなりにある程度の効果か認められてい
るものの、実際の操業においては、温度制御の困難さ、
生産効率の低さ、さらには鋳込み失敗率の高さ等からそ
の実用化はほとんど不可能であった。また比較的低温で
長時間(数時間)加熱均熱する場合には、効果か認めら
れるとはいうものの、後述するように1400℃付近の
高温度へ急速加熱した場合には、等細菌部分てはインヒ
ビターの溶は残りかしばしば観察され、かえって特性劣
化の原因となる。
Although this technology has been recognized to be effective to some extent, in actual operation, it is difficult to control temperature,
Its practical application was almost impossible due to low production efficiency and high casting failure rate. Furthermore, although some effects can be seen when heating and soaking at a relatively low temperature for a long time (several hours), as will be explained later, when rapidly heating to a high temperature around 1400°C, the bacterial fraction is reduced. However, residual inhibitor dissolution is often observed, which may actually cause property deterioration.

その他、結晶粒細粒化技術としては、特公昭54278
20号公報に開示された技術もある。この技術は、有害
とされる柱状晶を有する連続鋳造スラブに適用してとく
に有効で、750〜1200’Cに加熱後、5〜50%
の圧下率て分塊圧延することによって整粒化し、しかる
後さらに高温に再加熱してインヒビターを改めて完全固
溶させる方法である。このようにインヒビター溶解の加
熱に先立ち、分塊圧延で一層スラブ組織を破壊する処理
は非常に有効とされているものの、かかる技術の適用に
おいては通常の加熱圧延工程に先たって分塊圧延ライン
を通過させる必要かあり、それによるコスト増加および
生産性阻害か著しい。しかも最近のように分塊圧延設備
かない工場では、この技術の適用は事実上不可能である
。
In addition, as a grain refining technology, Japanese Patent Publication No. 54278
There is also a technique disclosed in Publication No. 20. This technique is particularly effective when applied to continuously cast slabs with columnar crystals, which are considered harmful, and after heating to 750-1200'C, 5-50
This is a method in which the particles are sized by blooming at a rolling reduction ratio of 1,000,000, and then reheated to a high temperature to once again completely dissolve the inhibitor. Although the treatment of further destroying the slab structure through blooming rolling prior to heating to dissolve the inhibitor is considered to be very effective, in applying this technique, the blooming line must be completed before the normal hot rolling process. There is a need to pass through the system, which increases costs and impedes productivity significantly. Moreover, it is virtually impossible to apply this technology in modern factories that do not have blooming equipment.

このように従来の技術では、方向性けい素鋼板で良好な
特性を得るために必要とされているインヒビターの完全
溶解とスラブ組織の粗大化抑制とを開時かつ完全に達成
することは極めて難しく、またある程度達成できたにし
ても、新たな弊害の発生を免れ得なかった。
As described above, with conventional technology, it is extremely difficult to completely dissolve the inhibitor and suppress coarsening of the slab structure, which are required to obtain good properties in grain-oriented silicon steel sheets. , and even if they were able to achieve a certain degree, they could not avoid the occurrence of new adverse effects.

とくに最近では1400℃以上のスラブ加熱か可能とな
ってきており、以前より高温かつ短時間での加熱処理か
検討実用化されるようになっている。
In particular, recently it has become possible to heat slabs to 1400° C. or higher, and the possibility of heat treatment at higher temperatures and shorter times than before is being studied and put into practical use.

その際、インヒビターの溶解は平衡論的にはより容易と
なるはずではあるか、実際には必ずしもそうならないこ
と、しかも組織の粗大化は従来の低温長時間加熱に比較
して一層著しくなることか判明した。この場合インヒビ
ターの溶解は鋳造組織に強く依存し、とくに結晶粒径か
小さい等細菌部てはインヒビターか非常に溶解しにくい
部分かあることも判明した。
In this case, should the inhibitor be dissolved more easily in terms of equilibrium theory, but in reality this is not necessarily the case, and moreover, the coarsening of the tissue will be more significant than in conventional low-temperature, long-term heating. found. In this case, it has been found that the dissolution of the inhibitor strongly depends on the cast structure, and that there are parts in which the inhibitor is extremely difficult to dissolve, especially in bacterial parts such as small crystal grains.

発明者らは、上記の現象に注目して検討を重ねた結果、
非常に狭い範囲ながらインヒビターの溶解とスラブ組織
の粗大化抑制との双方をある程度満足できる加熱方法か
あることを見出し、特開昭63−287520号公報に
て開示した。しかしながら実際の操業においては、その
制御は必ずしも容易とは言えず、その改善すなわち加熱
条件の一層の緩和が望まれていた。
As a result of repeated studies focusing on the above phenomenon, the inventors found that
It has been discovered that there is a heating method that satisfies both the dissolution of the inhibitor and the suppression of coarsening of the slab structure to a certain extent, albeit within a very narrow range, and this was disclosed in JP-A-63-287520. However, in actual operation, this control is not necessarily easy, and there has been a desire for improvement, that is, further relaxation of the heating conditions.

一方、粗圧延によって組織を微細化し特性を改善しよう
とする技術としては、たとえは特開昭54120214
号公報に開示された1190〜960℃での再結晶高圧
下圧延による方法、特開昭55−119126号公報に
好ましい条件として開示された1150〜10500C
で、かつγ相を3%以上含んだ状態での30%以上の高
圧下圧延による方法、特開昭57−114614号公報
に開示された粗圧延開始温度を1250℃以下にする方
法、および特開昭59−93828号公報で開示された
1050〜1200℃で歪速度15s”−’以下、圧下
率を1596/パス以上とする方法などが挙げられる。
On the other hand, as a technique to refine the structure and improve properties by rough rolling, for example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 54120214
The method of recrystallization and high pressure rolling at 1190 to 960°C disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 119126/1984, and the method of 1150 to 10500C disclosed as preferred conditions in JP-A-55-119126.
and a method of rolling with a high reduction of 30% or more in a state containing 3% or more of γ phase, a method of reducing the rough rolling start temperature to 1250°C or less disclosed in JP-A-57-114614, and a method of Examples include the method disclosed in JP-A-59-93828 in which the strain rate is 15 s"-' or less at 1050 to 1200 DEG C. and the rolling reduction is 1596/pass or more.

これらはいずれも1100℃付近を中心とした比較的低
い温度域で圧延を行って、組織の微細化を図るという点
で共通している。すなわちこれらはいずれも、[鉄と鋼
J 67 (1981) S  L200に発表されて
いる再結晶開始限界が11008C付近にあるという現
象に関する知見あるいはそれと同一の技術思想、換言す
ると高温での圧延は再結晶には全く寄与せず、低温の再
結晶域での大きな歪付加のみが再結晶に寄与するという
知見に基づいている。すなわちこのデータは、高温加熱
したスラブでも再結晶による組織の微細化を狙うために
は、1100℃付近の温度まで冷却したのち圧延を行う
ことか必須であることを示している。
All of these have in common that rolling is performed in a relatively low temperature range centered around 1100° C. in order to refine the structure. In other words, all of these are based on the knowledge regarding the phenomenon that the recrystallization initiation limit is around 11008C, as announced in Tetsu to Hagane J 67 (1981) S L200, or the same technical idea, in other words, rolling at high temperatures does not lead to re-crystallization. This is based on the knowledge that it does not contribute to crystallization at all, and only large strain addition in the low-temperature recrystallization region contributes to recrystallization. In other words, this data indicates that even in a slab heated to a high temperature, in order to refine the structure through recrystallization, it is essential to cool the slab to a temperature around 1100° C. and then roll it.

そしてこれらの熱延方法ではいずれも1100℃付近で
熱間圧延することが最も好ましい方法であると結論づけ
ている。
It has been concluded that for all of these hot rolling methods, hot rolling at around 1100° C. is the most preferable method.

確かに、ある程度微細な組織を熱間圧延によってさらに
微細化する目的にはこれらの圧延方法はある程度効果的
である。しかるに通常のスラブ加熱条件では結晶粒は粒
径が10〜70mm程度とかなり粗大化してしまう。こ
のように結晶粒粗大化か大きい場合にはこれらの熱延方
法の適用のみでは必ずしも有効な効果が得られていない
。
Certainly, these rolling methods are effective to some extent for the purpose of further refining a somewhat fine structure by hot rolling. However, under normal slab heating conditions, the crystal grains become quite coarse, with a grain size of about 10 to 70 mm. In cases where the crystal grains are coarsened or coarsened as described above, the application of these hot rolling methods alone does not necessarily provide an effective effect.

また方向性けい素鋼板の製造するに際しては、組織の改
善に加えてインヒビターの分散を制御することがさらに
重要なことは良く知られていることである。
Furthermore, it is well known that in producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheets, in addition to improving the structure, it is even more important to control the dispersion of inhibitors.

しかしなから従来の技術ではこのインヒビターの最適分
散の観点からの検討か極めて不充分であった。例えは前
述した特開昭55−119126号では、その記載内容
全般から明らかなように組織の微細化のみしか検討され
てなく、インヒビターか重要な役割を演する磁気特性に
関しては全く触れられていない。良好な磁気特性を得る
ためにはインヒビターの分散を最適化することか必須で
あることは良く知られた事実である。
However, in the conventional techniques, studies from the viewpoint of optimal dispersion of this inhibitor have been extremely insufficient. For example, in the above-mentioned Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 119126/1983, as is clear from the overall content, only the microstructure is considered, and there is no mention of the magnetic properties that play an important role as an inhibitor. . It is a well-known fact that in order to obtain good magnetic properties, it is essential to optimize the dispersion of the inhibitor.

従ってインヒビターのことを全く考慮していない従来の
組繊細粒化技術を実工程に適用しても、工程的不都合か
大きいわりにはその改善効果は期待される程大きくはな
かった。そこでこのような難点を改善する熱間圧延方法
の開発か強く望まれていた。
Therefore, even if the conventional fine graining technology, which does not take inhibitors into account at all, was applied to the actual process, the improvement effect was not as great as expected, although the process was inconvenient. Therefore, there was a strong desire to develop a hot rolling method that would overcome these difficulties.

(発明か解決しようとする課題) この発明は、組織の微細化とインヒビターの適正な分散
を達成し、表面性状および磁気特性の同時改善を可能な
らしめた一方向性けい素鋼の有利な製造方法を提案する
ことを目的とする。
(Invention or Problem to be Solved) The present invention provides an advantageous method for manufacturing unidirectional silicon steel that achieves finer structure and proper dispersion of inhibitors, and simultaneously improves surface properties and magnetic properties. The purpose is to propose a method.

(課題を解決するための手段) この発明は、以下に述へるような新規知見から、従来全
く考慮されていなかった板厚方向の温度、組織を制御す
るという技術思想に基ついで完成されたものである。
(Means for solving the problem) This invention was completed based on the following new findings and the technical idea of controlling the temperature and structure in the thickness direction, which had not been considered at all in the past. It is something.

すなわち、実際に工場で熱間圧延過程にある鋼板は常に
板厚方向の温度分布を有している。とくに粗圧延の工程
では最終パスでも入り側板厚は50〜1.00 mmも
あるため、かなり大きな温度の変化かある。しかるに従
来の技術ではその温度分布を全く無視して平均温度のみ
考えて処理するのが一般的であった。この発明は、この
ような板厚方向の温度分布を有効かつ積極的に利用して
最適な組織と最適なインヒビター分散状態を得ようとす
るものである。
That is, a steel plate actually undergoing hot rolling in a factory always has a temperature distribution in the thickness direction. In particular, in the rough rolling process, even in the final pass, the plate thickness on the entry side is 50 to 1.00 mm, so there is a fairly large temperature change. However, in conventional techniques, it has been common to completely ignore the temperature distribution and process only the average temperature. This invention attempts to obtain an optimal structure and an optimal inhibitor dispersion state by effectively and actively utilizing such temperature distribution in the thickness direction.

さて発明者らは、予備的検討により、従来不明確であっ
たインヒビターの析出曲線を明確にし、適正温度範囲を
明らかにした。また板厚方向の組織変化、とくに粗圧延
中の板厚方向の組織変化か大きいことも明らかにした。
Through preliminary studies, the inventors have now clarified the inhibitor's precipitation curve, which was previously unclear, and clarified the appropriate temperature range. It was also revealed that the structural changes in the thickness direction, especially during rough rolling, were large.

その結果、鋼板の平均温度の変化で考えた場合には、組
織とインヒビター分散を同時に満足できる条件は存在し
ないけれとも、板厚方向の温度分布を考慮すれは両者を
同時に満足し得る粗圧延条件か狭いなからも存在するこ
とを見い出した。
As a result, when considering changes in the average temperature of the steel plate, there is no condition that can satisfy the structure and inhibitor dispersion at the same time, but when considering the temperature distribution in the thickness direction, there are rough rolling conditions that can satisfy both at the same time. I discovered that it exists even in a small space.

そこで、上記の結果を基にさらに詳細な検討を加えた結
果、特定の素材成分において、粗圧延時における温度分
布と圧延条件を制御することにより、所期した目的か有
利に達成されることの知見を得たのである。
Therefore, as a result of further detailed study based on the above results, we found that the desired objective could be achieved advantageously by controlling the temperature distribution and rolling conditions during rough rolling for specific material components. I gained knowledge.

この発明は、上記の知見に立脚するものである。This invention is based on the above knowledge.

すなわちこの発明は、 C: 0.05〜0.09 wt%(以下単に%て示す
)、Si:2.5〜4.0%および Mn : 0.03〜0.10% を含み、かつ S、SeおよびAIのうちから選んだ少なくとも1種:
0.01〜0.10% を含有する組成になるけい素鋼スラブを、加熱後、熱間
粗圧延に引き続いて熱間仕上げ圧延し、ついで1回ない
し中間焼鈍を挟む2回の冷間圧延を施して最終板厚とし
、脱炭焼鈍後、最終仕上げ焼鈍を施す一連の工程によっ
て方向性けい素鋼板を製造するに際し、 上記熱間粗圧延の最終パスを、鋼板の最表層から板厚の
1,15の深さまでの温度か1200〜1250℃の範
囲でかつ、圧下率:5006以上の条件下で実施するこ
とからなる磁気特性の優れた方向性けい素鋼板の製造方
法である。
That is, this invention contains C: 0.05 to 0.09 wt% (hereinafter simply indicated as %), Si: 2.5 to 4.0%, and Mn: 0.03 to 0.10%, and S , Se and AI:
After heating, a silicon steel slab having a composition containing 0.01 to 0.10% is subjected to hot rough rolling, followed by hot finish rolling, and then cold rolling once or twice with intermediate annealing in between. When manufacturing grain-oriented silicon steel sheets through a series of steps including decarburization annealing and final finish annealing, the final pass of the hot rough rolling is carried out from the outermost layer of the steel sheet to the final thickness. This is a method for producing a grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties, which is carried out at a temperature of 1200 to 1250 DEG C. to a depth of 1.15 DEG C. and at a rolling reduction of 5006 DEG C. or more.

以下、この発明の基礎となった実験結果についで説明す
る。
The experimental results that formed the basis of this invention will be explained below.

さて発明者らは多くの実験を行った結果、インヒビター
の析出状態か温度に依存して大きく変化することを明ら
かにした。その要点は1000〜1100℃付近の温度
で圧延され保持されるとインヒビターは粗大に析出し、
良好な特性か得難いという二とである。またこの条件下
で仮に良好な特性か得られたとしても、その範囲は非常
に狭く、現実的な技術とはなり得ないことも経験された
。従って、成分系、熱延まての温度履歴にもよるか、少
なくとも11508C以下−船釣に1200℃未満での
粗圧延は避けるべきであることが判明した。
As a result of many experiments, the inventors have found that the precipitation state of the inhibitor changes greatly depending on the temperature. The key point is that when rolled and held at temperatures around 1000 to 1100°C, the inhibitor precipitates coarsely.
Either it has good properties or it is difficult to obtain. It has also been experienced that even if good characteristics were obtained under these conditions, the range would be very narrow and it would not be a practical technology. Therefore, depending on the component system and the temperature history during hot rolling, it was found that rough rolling at temperatures below 1200°C should be avoided at least below 11508°C.

上記の知見を得た実験結果を第1図に示す。なお同図の
実験は、C:0.03%、Si:3.0%、Mn:o、
i%およびSe : 0.024%を含有する厚み12
0皿の真空溶解鋼を素材とし、研究小型圧延機を用いて
実施したものである。
The experimental results from which the above findings were obtained are shown in FIG. The experiment shown in the same figure was conducted using C: 0.03%, Si: 3.0%, Mn: o,
i% and Se: Thickness 12 containing 0.024%
This experiment was conducted using a small research rolling mill, using zero plate vacuum melted steel as the material.

ところで従来のけい素鋼粗圧延技術では、1100〜1
000℃付近の低温で圧延することが好ましいとされて
いた。その基本となっている技術思想は、この温度域で
は硬質のγ相が最も生成し易く、従ってその周辺に歪が
蓄積し再結晶も促進されるという考えである。従って前
述したように、最適の粗圧延条件は第2図に示すような
1000〜1100’Cの範囲にあるとされ、従来の粗
圧延条件はこの範囲を狙って設定されていた。しかしな
がらこの範囲は前掲第1図で示したとおり、インヒビタ
ーの析出という観点からは最も好ましくない温度範囲で
ある。
By the way, with conventional silicon steel rough rolling technology,
It was considered preferable to roll at a low temperature around 000°C. The basic technical idea is that in this temperature range, the hard γ phase is most likely to be formed, and therefore strain accumulates around it, promoting recrystallization. Therefore, as described above, the optimum rough rolling conditions are said to be in the range of 1000 to 1100'C as shown in FIG. 2, and conventional rough rolling conditions were set aiming at this range. However, as shown in FIG. 1 above, this temperature range is the most unfavorable temperature range from the viewpoint of inhibitor precipitation.

したがって従来の技術では結晶組織が最適になるような
条件て粗圧延を行えば、必然的にインヒビターの析出は
不適切になっていたのである。
Therefore, in the conventional technology, if rough rolling is performed under conditions that optimize the crystal structure, inhibitor precipitation inevitably becomes inappropriate.

このように従来は、処理温度として板の平均温度を採用
していたため、従来技術で最適とされている粗圧延条件
であっても、実際には、組織改善とインヒビター分散と
の双方を同時に満足させることはできず、実工程ではど
ちらかを犠牲にせざるを得なかったのである。
In this way, in the past, the average temperature of the plate was used as the processing temperature, so even with the rough rolling conditions that were considered optimal in the conventional technology, in reality it was not possible to simultaneously satisfy both microstructure improvement and inhibitor dispersion. Therefore, in the actual process, one or the other had to be sacrificed.

以上のような経験から、発明者らは上記の問題を解決す
るため、板厚方向にわたる組織を制御するという考え方
を導入した。そのためにまず粗圧延中の鋼板の組織を詳
細に観察した。
Based on the above experience, the inventors introduced the idea of controlling the structure in the thickness direction in order to solve the above problems. For this purpose, the structure of the steel sheet during rough rolling was first observed in detail.

通常の高温加熱材の粗圧延後のシートバー組織の典型例
を第3図に模式的に示す。
A typical example of the sheet bar structure after rough rolling of a normal high-temperature heating material is schematically shown in FIG.

同図に示したとおり、粗圧延後のシートバーの段階では
、表面層から115厚付近までは高い確率で粗大な結晶
粒となっている。一方それより中心側では均一に再結晶
し微細な結晶粒となっている。
As shown in the figure, at the stage of the sheet bar after rough rolling, there is a high probability of coarse grains from the surface layer to around 115 mm thick. On the other hand, closer to the center, it recrystallizes uniformly and becomes fine crystal grains.

このような組織となる理由としては以下の過程か考えら
れる。
The reason for such an organization may be the following process.

すなわち連続鋳造されたスラブでは表層近傍で柱状晶か
発達し、結晶粒か長く伸びて大きいことか第1の理由と
して挙げられる。そしてさらにスラブを高温に加熱する
とその結晶粒かさらに粗大化する。加熱後のスラブは熱
間圧延に供せられるか、その際小さな結晶粒は容易に再
結晶するが初めから大きな結晶粒は容易に再結晶しない
。従って鋼板の中心部は圧延パス毎に再結晶しどんどん
細粒化するか、表層は容易には再結晶しない。その結果
として表層と中心部で非常に大きな粒径差か生じたもの
と考えられる。そしてこのような組織の差は最近のよう
に1400℃以上の超高温にスラブを加熱する場合によ
り顕著となってくる。従って組織改善の必要性はとくに
表層から115深さまての層であると言える。
In other words, the first reason is that in continuously cast slabs, columnar crystals develop near the surface layer, and the crystal grains are elongated and large. When the slab is further heated to a high temperature, its crystal grains become even coarser. The heated slab is subjected to hot rolling, during which time small crystal grains easily recrystallize, but large crystal grains do not easily recrystallize from the beginning. Therefore, either the center of the steel plate recrystallizes and becomes finer and finer with each rolling pass, or the surface layer does not recrystallize easily. As a result, it is thought that a very large difference in particle size occurred between the surface layer and the center. These differences in structure become more noticeable when slabs are heated to ultra-high temperatures of 1400° C. or higher, as has been the case recently. Therefore, it can be said that there is a particular need for tissue improvement in the layers from the surface layer to a depth of 115 mm.

そこてインヒビターの析出には悪影響を及はさない12
00℃以上の温度で、この最表層から115深さまでを
再結晶微細化させる方法についで種々検討した。
Therefore, it does not have a negative effect on inhibitor precipitation12
Various methods were investigated for recrystallizing the surface layer to a depth of 115 mm at a temperature of 00° C. or higher.

第4図に、再結晶率に及はす圧下率とC含有量の影響に
ついで示す。同図は、板厚50[[II[lの3%S1
鋼を1200℃に加熱したのち、研究圧延機にて種々の
圧下率て圧延し、その後の再結晶率を調へた結果を示し
たものである。
FIG. 4 shows the effects of rolling reduction and C content on the recrystallization rate. The figure shows a plate thickness of 50[[II[l of 3%S1
After heating the steel to 1200°C, it was rolled at various reduction ratios in a research rolling mill, and the subsequent recrystallization rate was investigated.

同図より、再結晶率は初期粒径に大きく依存することか
判る。初期粒径か5mmの場合には圧下率50%以上に
なると再結晶率が70%を超え、十分に微細な組織か得
られている。しかしながら初期粒径か30mmの場合に
は、圧下率か70%ても再結晶率はせいせい35%程度
にすぎない。
From the figure, it can be seen that the recrystallization rate largely depends on the initial grain size. When the initial grain size is 5 mm, the recrystallization rate exceeds 70% when the reduction rate is 50% or more, and a sufficiently fine structure is obtained. However, when the initial grain size is 30 mm, the recrystallization rate is only about 35% at most even if the rolling reduction is 70%.

スラブを高温とくに1400℃以上に加熱すると結晶粒
径は非常に大きくなりやすい。実際にスラブ加熱後の粒
径を5mm程度に抑えることは極めて難しく、多くの場
合は10〜30皿程度、さらには50mm以上になる場
合もある。
When a slab is heated to a high temperature, particularly 1400° C. or higher, the crystal grain size tends to become very large. In reality, it is extremely difficult to suppress the particle size after heating the slab to about 5 mm, and in many cases it is about 10 to 30 plates, and even more than 50 mm.

従って大きな結晶粒径の場合でも確実に再結晶し細粒化
する技術か必要となる。
Therefore, a technique is required to reliably recrystallize and refine grains even in the case of large grain sizes.

そこでさらに結晶粒径か大きい場合でも細粒化する方法
についで検討した。なおこのときインヒビター粗大析出
防止の観点から1200℃以上の温度で圧延することを
前提とした。
Therefore, we next investigated a method for making the grains finer even when the grain size is large. At this time, it was assumed that rolling was carried out at a temperature of 1200° C. or higher from the viewpoint of preventing coarse inhibitor precipitation.

その結果、C量を通常よりも高くし、かつ大圧下するこ
とにより、所期した目的か有利に達成されることの知見
を得た。すなわちたとえばC量を0、075%まで高め
た場合には、圧延温度: 1200℃1初期粒径:40
ル、圧下率:50%て90%以上の再結晶率が得られた
のである。
As a result, it was found that the desired objective can be advantageously achieved by increasing the amount of C and reducing the pressure by a large amount. That is, for example, when the C content is increased to 0.075%, rolling temperature: 1200°C 1 initial grain size: 40
A recrystallization rate of 90% or more was obtained at a rolling reduction rate of 50%.

その結果を第4図に併記する。The results are also shown in Figure 4.

次に、圧延温度1200〜1250℃で高い再結晶率か
得られるC含有量および圧下率の適正範囲についで検討
した。
Next, we investigated the appropriate ranges of C content and rolling reduction that would allow a high recrystallization rate to be obtained at a rolling temperature of 1,200 to 1,250°C.

その結果を第5図に示す。The results are shown in FIG.

図中に点線で示した、C含有量:0.05%以上、圧下
率:50%以上の範囲で、再結晶率=75%以上か得ら
れた。
In the range of C content: 0.05% or more and rolling reduction: 50% or more, as shown by the dotted line in the figure, a recrystallization rate of 75% or more was obtained.

そこてこの発明ては、C含有量および圧下率につき、上
記の範囲に限定したのである。
Therefore, in this invention, the C content and rolling reduction are limited to the above ranges.

なお上記の効果は、C含有量か多くなることによってγ
相か適当な分散で生成することか主な理由と推定される
か、圧延温度が低くなると再結晶速度か低下するためか
必ずしも満足いく効果か得られない場合もあった。従っ
てこの面からは、圧延温度を1200’c以上とする必
要かある。しかしながら圧延温度か高くなりすぎると、
細粒化効果か小さくなると共に、仕上げ圧延までに十分
に冷却できなくなるので圧延温度の上限は1250℃と
する。
Note that the above effect can be achieved by increasing the C content.
The main reason may be that the phase is formed with appropriate dispersion, or perhaps because the recrystallization rate decreases as the rolling temperature decreases, but in some cases, a satisfactory effect was not always obtained. Therefore, from this point of view, it is necessary to set the rolling temperature to 1200'c or higher. However, if the rolling temperature becomes too high,
The upper limit of the rolling temperature is set at 1250° C. because the grain refining effect becomes small and it becomes impossible to cool the material sufficiently before finishing rolling.

次に、上記知見を実際の粗圧延工程に適用した場合につ
いで考察する。
Next, we will discuss the case where the above knowledge is applied to an actual rough rolling process.

粗圧延の最終パスでも入側の板厚は50mm以上、場合
によっては100mm程度もあり、板厚方向の温度を均
一にすることは難しい。従来の考え方は板厚方向の温度
を均一にすることか組織の均一化に結びつくという思想
であり、それ故温度均−化の努力か続けられてきた。す
なわち温度均一化のために急冷を避け、かつてきるたけ
低い温度て粗圧延を終了しようとするのか従来の考え方
である。
Even in the final pass of rough rolling, the plate thickness on the entry side is 50 mm or more, and in some cases as much as 100 mm, making it difficult to make the temperature uniform in the thickness direction. The conventional idea was that making the temperature uniform in the thickness direction of the plate would lead to a uniform structure, and therefore efforts to equalize the temperature have continued. That is, the conventional way of thinking is to avoid rapid cooling in order to equalize the temperature and to finish rough rolling at as low a temperature as possible.

このような圧延途中の高温長時間保持の方法ではとうし
ても1100℃付近の析出危険温度域ての滞留時間か長
くなってしまいインヒビターの粗大化か起こることは前
述したとおりてあり、その結果、良好な特性は望み得な
かったのである。
As mentioned above, in this method of holding high temperature for a long time during rolling, the residence time in the precipitation dangerous temperature range around 1100°C becomes long and the inhibitor becomes coarse. , good characteristics could not be expected.

このような弊害を回避するためにこの発明では、表層l
/′5深さまてをたとえは急冷することによって目的温
度に到達させるのである。この深さ範囲であれは表面か
らの冷却で十分に目的温度に制御することかできる。従
ってこの発明の効果は、粗圧延時の冷却制証によって粗
圧延最終パス時の最表層から115深さまでの圧延温度
を1200〜1250℃とし、かつ圧下率:5094以
上とすることによって得ることかできる。
In order to avoid such disadvantages, this invention
The target temperature is reached by rapid cooling, for example, to a depth of /'5. Within this depth range, the target temperature can be sufficiently controlled by cooling from the surface. Therefore, the effects of this invention can be obtained by setting the rolling temperature from the outermost layer to 115 depth during the final pass of rough rolling to 1200 to 1250°C by cooling control during rough rolling, and by setting the rolling reduction ratio to 5094 or more. can.

なお冷却は積極的に水スプレーを使用する方法か好まし
い。放熱か大きく空冷でも所定の温度条件を満足できれ
ば勿論それてもかまわない。たたし最終パス前に徐冷し
てシー)・バー全体の温度を下げる方法は最も好ましく
ない。従って最終パスより一つ前の圧延から最終パスま
での時間は可能なかぎり短くし、かつ強制水冷する方法
が最も好ましい。具体的なパス間時間は30秒以下か好
ましく、60秒以上は好ましくない。
For cooling, it is preferable to actively use water spray. Of course, heat radiation or air cooling may be used as long as the predetermined temperature conditions can be satisfied. The least preferable method is to lower the temperature of the entire bar by slowly cooling it before the final pass. Therefore, the most preferable method is to shorten the time from the rolling immediately before the final pass to the final pass as much as possible, and to perform forced water cooling. Specifically, the inter-pass time is preferably 30 seconds or less, and is not preferably 60 seconds or more.

このような方法で圧延することにより良好な特性か得ら
れると共に、極力排除したい欠陥の−ってあった粗大粒
に起因する線状細粒の発生率を大幅に低下させることか
できたのである。
By rolling with this method, not only were good properties obtained, but the incidence of linear fine grains caused by coarse grains, which was the defect that we wanted to eliminate as much as possible, could be significantly reduced. .

(作 用) この発明において、素材の成分組成を前記の範囲に限定
した理由は次のとおりである。
(Function) In this invention, the reason why the component composition of the material is limited to the above range is as follows.

C:0.05〜0.09% Cの範囲を0.05%以上としたのは、前掲第4図にも
示したとおり、初期粒径か大きい場合であっても、粗圧
延中に1200〜1250℃て(α+γ)域を通過させ
ることによって熱延組織の改善を図ることを意図したも
ので、その適正範囲として限定したものである。上限は
特性か劣化しない範囲として0.0996とした。
C: 0.05-0.09% The reason for setting the C range to 0.05% or more is that, as shown in Figure 4 above, even if the initial grain size is large, 1200% C is set during rough rolling. It is intended to improve the hot-rolled structure by passing through the (α+γ) region at ~1250°C, and is limited to the appropriate range. The upper limit was set at 0.0996 as a range in which the characteristics did not deteriorate.

Si:2.5〜4.0% Siは、鋼板の比抵抗を高め鉄損の低減に有効であるか
、4.0!%を上回ると冷延性か損なわれ、−方2.5
%を下回ると鉄損低減効果か弱まることの他、2次再結
晶と純化のため行われる最終高温仕上げ焼鈍においてα
−γ変態によって結晶方位のランダム化を生じ十分な特
性を得られない。
Si: 2.5 to 4.0% Si is effective in increasing the resistivity of steel sheets and reducing iron loss, 4.0! If it exceeds 2.5%, the cold rollability will be impaired.
%, the effect of reducing iron loss will be weakened, and the final high-temperature finishing annealing for secondary recrystallization and purification will
-γ transformation causes randomization of crystal orientation, making it impossible to obtain sufficient properties.

Mn : 0.03〜0.10% Mnは、熱間脆性による割れを生じない下限の量として
少なくとも0.03%か必要であり、上限はMnSやM
nSeの解離固溶温度を高めないため、及びスラブ抽出
から粗圧延に至る時間規制の過程てインヒビターの粗大
化を起こさせないために、0.10%に制限される。
Mn: 0.03 to 0.10% Mn must be at least 0.03% as a lower limit amount that does not cause cracking due to hot embrittlement, and the upper limit is MnS and Mn.
The content is limited to 0.10% in order not to increase the dissociation solid solution temperature of nSe and to prevent the inhibitor from becoming coarse during the time control process from slab extraction to rough rolling.

S、SeおよびAIのうちから選んだ少なくとも1種:
0.01〜0.10% S、SeおよびAIはそれぞれ、MnS、 MnSe、
 AINの形で鋼中に微細に分散し、インヒビターとし
て作用するもので、このインヒビターとしての機能を十
分に発現させるためには少なくとも0.01%か必要で
ある。また上限のo、io%はMnの場合と同様、イン
ヒビターの解離固溶をし易くすることと熱延中の粗大化
防止の点から定めた。なおAIをインヒビター成分とし
て用いる場合、これにバランスするN量が必要になるの
は言うまでもない。Nの好適量は0.001〜0.06
5%である。
At least one selected from S, Se and AI:
0.01-0.10% S, Se and AI are respectively MnS, MnSe,
It is finely dispersed in the steel in the form of AIN and acts as an inhibitor, and in order to fully exhibit its function as an inhibitor, it needs to be at least 0.01%. In addition, the upper limits of o and io% were determined in the same manner as in the case of Mn from the viewpoint of facilitating dissociation and solid solution of the inhibitor and prevention of coarsening during hot rolling. Note that when AI is used as an inhibitor component, it goes without saying that a balanced amount of N is required. The preferred amount of N is 0.001 to 0.06
It is 5%.

インヒビターとしては上記元素の他に、sbやSn。In addition to the above elements, examples of inhibitors include sb and Sn.

As、 Pb、 Bi、 Cu、 Mo、  B等の粒
界偏析元素か知られており、これらを併用することも可
能である。
Grain boundary segregation elements such as As, Pb, Bi, Cu, Mo, and B are known, and it is also possible to use these in combination.

(実施例) 実施例I C:0.080%、Si : 3.30?4、Mn :
 0.05496、SeO,022%、Sb : 0.
024%、Al : 0.025%およびNO,009
96を含有し、残部実質的にFeの組成になる厚み: 
200mmの連鋳スラブを、加熱炉に装入し、N2雰囲
気中で1400℃960分間灼熱保持し、インヒビター
を十分に溶解させたのち、直ちに粗圧延に供した。粗圧
延は4パスにて行い、50〜30mm厚さのシートバー
に仕上げた。その際冷却条件、圧延条件を第1表に示し
たとおり種々変化させた。
(Example) Example I C: 0.080%, Si: 3.30?4, Mn:
0.05496, SeO, 022%, Sb: 0.
024%, Al: 0.025% and NO,009
Thickness containing 96 and the remainder being substantially Fe:
A 200 mm continuous cast slab was placed in a heating furnace and heated at 1400° C. for 960 minutes in a N2 atmosphere to sufficiently dissolve the inhibitor, and immediately subjected to rough rolling. Rough rolling was performed in 4 passes to produce a sheet bar with a thickness of 50 to 30 mm. At that time, the cooling conditions and rolling conditions were varied as shown in Table 1.

その後、板厚: 2.2mmの熱延板としたのち、1次
冷延、中間焼鈍、2次冷延て0.20mm厚とし、つい
で2次再結晶、純化を目的とする最終仕上げ焼鈍を施し
て最終製品とした。
After that, it was hot-rolled to a thickness of 2.2 mm, then subjected to primary cold rolling, intermediate annealing, and secondary cold rolling to a thickness of 0.20 mm, followed by secondary recrystallization and final finish annealing for the purpose of purification. The final product was obtained.

かくして得られた製品の磁気特性および線状細粒のコイ
ル長手方向の発生率についで調へた結果を第1表に示す
。
Table 1 shows the results of investigating the magnetic properties of the product thus obtained and the incidence of linear fine particles in the longitudinal direction of the coil.

なお線状細粒の発生率は製品欠陥として切捨てさるを得
ない部分の比率で示した。
Incidentally, the incidence of linear fine particles was expressed as the proportion of the part that had to be discarded as a product defect.

第1表から明らかなように、この発明に従い得られたも
のは、磁気特性に優れるたけてなく、線状細粒の発生率
か格段に低減している。
As is clear from Table 1, the products obtained according to the present invention have excellent magnetic properties and the incidence of linear fine grains is significantly reduced.

(発明の効果) かくしてこの発明によれは、結晶組織の微細化どインヒ
ビターの適正な分散を同時に達成でき、従って線状細粒
の発生かなくしかも磁気特性に優れた一方向性けい素鋼
板を安定して得ることかできる。
(Effects of the Invention) Thus, according to the present invention, it is possible to simultaneously achieve refinement of the crystal structure and proper dispersion of the inhibitor, thereby producing a unidirectional silicon steel sheet that does not generate linear fine grains and has excellent magnetic properties. It is possible to obtain it stably.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図は、インヒビターの析出状態に及はす圧延温度お
よび保持時間の影響を示したグラフ、第2図は、再結晶
挙動に及はす圧延温度および圧下率の影響を示したグラ
フ、 第3図は、通常の高温加熱材の粗圧延後におけるシート
バー組織断面の模式図、 第4図は、再結晶率に及ぼす圧下率の影響を初期粒径お
よびC量をパラメーターとして示したグラフ、 第5図は、再結晶率に及ぼすC量と圧下率との関係を示
したグラフである。 同
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the influence of rolling temperature and holding time on the inhibitor precipitation state, FIG. 2 is a graph showing the influence of rolling temperature and rolling reduction on recrystallization behavior, Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the cross-section of the sheet bar structure after rough rolling of a normal high-temperature heated material. Figure 4 is a graph showing the influence of the rolling reduction on the recrystallization rate using the initial grain size and C content as parameters. FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the amount of C and the rolling reduction rate on the recrystallization rate. same

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1、C:0.05〜0.09wt%、 Si:2.5〜4.0wt%および Mn:0.03〜0.10wt% を含み、かつ S,SeおよびAlのうちから選んだ少なくとも1種:
0.01〜0.10wt% を含有する組成になるけい素鋼スラブを、加熱後、熱間
粗圧延に引き続いて熱間仕上げ圧延し、ついで1回ない
し中間焼鈍を挟む2回の冷間圧延を施して最終板厚とし
、脱炭焼鈍後、最終仕上げ焼鈍を施す一連の工程によっ
て方向性けい素鋼板を製造するに際し、 上記熱間粗圧延の最終パスを、鋼板の最表 層から板厚の1/5の深さまでの温度が1200〜12
50℃の範囲でかつ、圧下率:50%以上の条件下で実
施することを特徴とする磁気特性の優れた方向性けい素
鋼板の製造方法。
[Claims] 1. Contains C: 0.05 to 0.09 wt%, Si: 2.5 to 4.0 wt% and Mn: 0.03 to 0.10 wt%, and contains S, Se and Al. At least one of these:
After heating, a silicon steel slab having a composition containing 0.01 to 0.10 wt% is subjected to hot rough rolling, followed by hot finish rolling, and then cold rolling once or twice with intermediate annealing in between. When manufacturing grain-oriented silicon steel sheets through a series of steps including decarburization annealing and final finish annealing, the final pass of the hot rough rolling is carried out from the outermost layer of the steel sheet to the final thickness. Temperature up to 1/5 depth is 1200~12
A method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheets with excellent magnetic properties, characterized in that the method is carried out at a temperature of 50° C. and a rolling reduction of 50% or more.
JP2240097A 1990-09-12 1990-09-12 Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties Expired - Fee Related JPH0739610B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2240097A JPH0739610B2 (en) 1990-09-12 1990-09-12 Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2240097A JPH0739610B2 (en) 1990-09-12 1990-09-12 Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04124218A true JPH04124218A (en) 1992-04-24
JPH0739610B2 JPH0739610B2 (en) 1995-05-01

Family

ID=17054450

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2240097A Expired - Fee Related JPH0739610B2 (en) 1990-09-12 1990-09-12 Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0739610B2 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5764408A (en) * 1995-04-06 1998-06-09 Nikon Corporation Lens-barrel optical system and microscope apparatus
US6208462B1 (en) 1997-09-22 2001-03-27 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Conversion optical system
US6407857B2 (en) 2000-03-14 2002-06-18 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Lens barrel with variable eyepoint position and microscope using the same lens barrel
JP2020169366A (en) * 2019-04-05 2020-10-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2020169368A (en) * 2019-04-05 2020-10-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2023125497A (en) * 2022-02-28 2023-09-07 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5764408A (en) * 1995-04-06 1998-06-09 Nikon Corporation Lens-barrel optical system and microscope apparatus
US6208462B1 (en) 1997-09-22 2001-03-27 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Conversion optical system
US6407857B2 (en) 2000-03-14 2002-06-18 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Lens barrel with variable eyepoint position and microscope using the same lens barrel
JP2020169366A (en) * 2019-04-05 2020-10-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2020169368A (en) * 2019-04-05 2020-10-15 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet
JP2023125497A (en) * 2022-02-28 2023-09-07 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0739610B2 (en) 1995-05-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2006132095A1 (en) Grain-oriented magnetic steel sheet with extremely high magnetic property and process for producing the same
JPS6037172B2 (en) Manufacturing method of unidirectional silicon steel sheet
JPH0433851B2 (en)
JPS5813606B2 (en) It&#39;s hard to tell what&#39;s going on.
KR0169734B1 (en) Process for manufacturing unidirectional steel sheet excellent in magnetic properties
JP4585144B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JPH0739610B2 (en) Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JP3369443B2 (en) Manufacturing method of high magnetic flux density unidirectional electrical steel sheet
JP3849146B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet
JPS6171104A (en) Hot rolling method of grain oriented silicon steel
JPH04301035A (en) Production of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having magnetic property uniform in longitudinal direction
JPH0310020A (en) Production of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in magnetic property and surface characteristic
JP3133855B2 (en) Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JP3538855B2 (en) Manufacturing method of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet
JP3536303B2 (en) Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet with uniform magnetic properties in the width direction
JP3849310B2 (en) Method for producing grain-oriented electrical steel sheet without ear cracks
JPH02263923A (en) Production of grain-oriented silicon steel sheet excellent in magnetic property
JP3885240B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet
JP2872404B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JP2612074B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties and surface properties
JP2883224B2 (en) Manufacturing method of grain-oriented electrical steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JP3301622B2 (en) Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet having uniform and excellent magnetic properties in the sheet width direction
JP3612717B2 (en) Method for producing grain-oriented silicon steel sheet
JP3336172B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties
JP3858280B2 (en) Method for producing unidirectional silicon steel sheet with excellent magnetic properties

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
S531 Written request for registration of change of domicile

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313531

S533 Written request for registration of change of name

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R313533

R350 Written notification of registration of transfer

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R350

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090501

Year of fee payment: 14

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090501

Year of fee payment: 14

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100501

Year of fee payment: 15

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees