JPH0430462B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0430462B2
JPH0430462B2 JP30174486A JP30174486A JPH0430462B2 JP H0430462 B2 JPH0430462 B2 JP H0430462B2 JP 30174486 A JP30174486 A JP 30174486A JP 30174486 A JP30174486 A JP 30174486A JP H0430462 B2 JPH0430462 B2 JP H0430462B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
wire
less
steel
spring
strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP30174486A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS63227748A (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP30174486A priority Critical patent/JPS63227748A/en
Publication of JPS63227748A publication Critical patent/JPS63227748A/en
Publication of JPH0430462B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0430462B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明はピアノ線B種SWP―B(JIS G3522)
以上のヘタリ特性、水素脆性に優れ、ばね寿命が
長い高強度ばね用鋼線およびその製造方法に関す
るものである。 〔従来の技術〕 冷間伸線によるばね材料としてはピアノ線や硬
鋼線が使用されているが、伸線後の歪取焼鈍後の
ばね用鋼線で引張強さは4mmφで160〜200Kgf/
mm2程度であつた。しかし、ばねの軽量化、信頼性
向上のため高張力化、非変形介在物低減、ヘタリ
特性の改善が望まれている。 これらを解決する手段に関し種々の成分系の高
張力線材が提案されている。例えば、特公昭43−
86211号公報に示される「高強度・高靭性を有す
る高炭素線用鋼」のSi,Mn,Ni,Cr,W,Vを
添加した低合金鋼および山腰登らが神戸製鋼技報
Vol.23,No.3(1973)に発表した「高炭素鋼線
の機械的性質に及ぼす合金元素添加の影響」など
以前より数多くの合金添加鋼が提案されてきた。 しかし、このように多くの成分系が提案されて
いるにもかかわらず工業的に大量生産されている
ものは少ない。それは合金元素添加により非変形
介在物が増加し疲労特性が改善されないことまた
パテンテイング処理がうまくいかず、伸線に適し
た微細パーライト組織が得にくいことなどであ
る。特に疲労やヘタリが重視されるばね用鋼線の
うち、軽量化が要求されるサイズは2〜8mmφと
比較的太い。現在最も高強度で実用化されている
ピアノ線に勝る高強度で工業的に安定生産可能な
高強度鋼線、また、使用雰囲気が200〜350℃にな
る用途も出てきており、低温長時間加熱しても強
度低下の少ない耐熱性のある冷間引抜鋼線、更に
焼入、焼戻した高強度鋼線と異なり、高強度で電
気めつき時の水素脆化の影響の少ないばね用鋼線
が望まれている。 〔発明が解決しようとする問題点〕 本発明はこのような従来からの要望を満足させ
るためになされたものであり、ピアノ線と低合金
鋼オイルテンパー線の中間に位置する加熱ヘタリ
特性を有し、更に電気めつき時の水素脆性の少な
い高強度ばね用鋼線およびその製造方法を提供し
ようとするにある。 〔問題点を解決するための手段及び作用〕 前記の問題点を解決するための手段の骨子とす
るところは (1) 成分系を特定したこと、即ちSi,Crを組合
せて耐熱性及びヘタリ特性の向上を図る。また
O,S規制を行い、Ca,Mg,Ba,Srのうち
の1種もしくは2種以上を単独又は合計で
0.0005〜0.005%添加することにより非変形介
在物を20μ以下としたこと、 (2) 伸線繊維組織を有するヘタリ特性に優れた水
素脆性の少ない鋼線であること、 (3) 更にこれらの鋼線の成分系、パテンテイング
条件、パテンテイング後の放置条件、更に伸線
加工法を組合せた製造方法である。 以上の如き本発明による問題点の解決手段の骨
子に基づき本発明の要旨とするところを下記の通
りとするものである。 (1) C:0.70〜1.00% Si:0.50〜2.00% Mn:0.40〜0.70% Cr:0.40〜1.00% P:0.025%以下、 N:0.005%以下 残部鉄および不可避的不純物よりなる鋼にお
いて S:0.015%以下、O:0.0050%以下、Ca,
Mg,Ba,Srのうちの1種もしくは2種以上を
単独又は合計で0.0005〜0.005%を含み、非変
形介在物を20μ以下とした伸線繊維組織を有す
るヘタリ特性に優れた水素脆性の少ない高強度
ばね用鋼線。 (2) C:0.70〜1.00% Si:0.50〜2.00% Mn:0.40〜0.70% Cr:0.40〜1.00% P:0.025%以下 N:0.0050%以下 残部鉄および不可避的不純物よりなる鋼にお
いて S:0.015%以下、O:0.0050%以下、Ca,
Mg,Ba,Srのうちの1種もしくは2種以上を
単独又は合計で0.0005〜0.005%を含み、非変
形介在物を20μ以下とした鋼線材を900〜1000
℃に加熱後、570〜650℃の鉛浴などでパテンテ
イング処理を行い、続いて、温度T(℃)、時間
t(hr)としてK=t×T/20が25〜500となるよ うな条件で放置もしくは加熱して鋼中の水素を
放出後、55〜95%の伸線加工を行うことを特徴
とする伸線繊維組織を有する高強度ばね用鋼線
の製造方法。 従来の高炭素低合金鋼はCを高めた上に炭化物
形成傾向の強いCr,V,Wを添加したり、パー
ライト変態を遅くし、かつミクロ偏析しやすい
Mnを複合添加していた。そのため伸線加工性を
著しく阻害していた。これを防止するためMnを
低く抑え、合金元素としてはSiとCrを組合わせ
た。炭化物を形成しないSiと炭化物形成元素を組
合わせることにより伸線加工性の悪化が防止でき
た。SiとCrの組合わせにより耐熱性とヘタリ特
性が一段と向上することがわかつた。 ばね用途では疲労が重要視される。低合金鋼で
は非変形介在物が疲労の起点となり疲労寿命を著
しく悪化させる。非変形介在物を極力少なくする
ためにO規制を行い、かつCa,Mg,Ba,Srの
微量添加が有効であることを見出した。これによ
り酸化物系介在物が変形しやすくなり20μ以上の
ものは出現しなくなるとともに変形介在物の硫化
物サイズが小さくなる。S規制によりこの効果は
顕著となる。疲労寿命はクラツクの伝播により決
定されるがこの伝播速度を小さくするためにP規
制を行なつた。歪取焼鈍時の歪時効起因の靭性劣
化防止のためN規制を行なつた。P,Sの規制に
より一段と効果がある。 従来種々の低合金鋼が開発されたが工業的に利
用されなかつた理由について研究を行なつた結
果、重要な事実が判つた。 パテンテイング条件とパテンテイング後から伸
線までの時間である。パテンテイングの際の加熱
温度については従来あまり重要視されていなかつ
た。低合金鋼ではできる限り低い温度でオーステ
ナイト変態後直ちに鉛浴に焼入れパーライト変態
を行うのがよいとされていた。オーステナイト化
後結晶粒の成長が起こり、パーライト変態後の絞
りが低下すると考えられていたためである。一般
炭素鋼の場合には問題なかつたが、低合金鋼では
非常に問題があることがわかつた。オーステナイ
ト化温度が低いと絞りは高いが、1μ以下ほとん
どの場合0.1〜0.2μ程度の未溶解炭化物が残存す
る。この微小な未溶解炭化物が残存すると伸線後
の歪取焼鈍により靭性が極端に悪化する。伸線後
の繊維組織を詳細に研究することによりこの事実
を発見した。そのためパテンテイング時の加熱温
度を高くする必要性を見出した。更にパーライト
組織でも恒温変態温度が低いとパーライトラメラ
ー組織が不整列で十分な伸線加工性が確保できな
い。それ故、恒温変態温度規制を行なつた。 このようにパテンテイング時の加熱温度を高く
するとパテンテイング直後の絞りは低いが徐々に
回復することを見出した。これは加熱時の水素吸
収によるものである。炭素鋼ではほとんど無視で
きるが低合金鋼で顕著である。低合金鋼ではパテ
ンテイング処理後、この放置もしくは加熱処理を
行なわないと絞りが30%以上にならない。長年の
研究により温度T(℃)、時間t(hr)としてK=
t×T/20が25以上になる条件で放置もしくは加熱 する必要があることがわかつた。20℃で25hr以上
の放置処理である。温度を上げることによつて時
間短縮が可能である。 鉛パテンテイング材を伸線加工して所定強度を
出すが鉛浴温度の下限規制を行なつているので引
張強さが低く55%以上の伸線加工を行なわないと
ピアノ線B種SWP―Bと同等以上の引張強さ確
保できない。上記の鉛浴は塩浴等いずれでも良
い。 また、この伸線加工により繊維組織が形成さ
れ、成分系の効果と組合わされヘタリ特性が優れ
かつ水素脆性の少ない高強度ばね用鋼線となる。 以上が本発明の基本思想である。 次に本発明の化学成分、非変形介在物、パテン
テイング条件、パテンテイング後の処理条件、伸
線条件の限定理由について説明する。 Cは強度、ミクロ組織の基本的元素である。含
有量が0.70%未満ではSWP―Bと同等以上の引
張強さのばね用鋼線の製造は不可能であるので、
C0.70%以上とした。Cが1.00%超となるとSi,
Cr添加鋼であつても網目状セメンタイト起因の
伸線加工時の断線を防止できないのでC1.00%以
下とした。 次にSiであるがフエライトの硬化作用が顕著と
なるのはSi0.50%以上である。しかし2.00%超と
なるとどのようなパテンテイング条件を採用して
も絞り30%以上出すことは不可能であり、伸線加
工がむずかしい。 Mnは熱間脆性を防止する元素であり、0.20%
以上ないと表面疵の発生を防止できない。かつ、
200Kgf/mm2以上の高張力化のためには0.40%以
上の添加が必要である。Mnはパーライト変態を
遅くするとともにミクロ偏析しやすい。それ故、
5分以内の鉛浴保持時間でミクロ偏析部を含めて
パーライト変態が終了可能なMn0.70%以下とし
た。 前述したように炭化物を形成しないSiと炭化物
形成元素のCrを組合せることにより伸線加工性
の悪化の防止が図れ、耐熱性、ヘタリ特性が一段
と向上する。この効果が得られるのはCrが0.40〜
1.00%の範囲である。 Pは疲労におけるクラツク伝播速度を小さくす
る効果が顕著となるP0.025%以下とした。 Sは熱間脆性の防止とCa,Mg,Ba,Srの添
加により硫化物サイズの微細化が期待できるよう
にS0.015%以下とした。 OはCa,Mg,Ba,Srの添加により変形介在
物に改質可能な0.0050%以下とした。これにより
非変形介在物が20μ以下となる。 Ca,Mg,Ba,Srであるがこれらはいずれも
O,Sとともに反応する元素であり、効果も同じ
である。それ故、1種添加も複合添加も同等に扱
える。また微量添加で著効を発揮する。多量添加
すると有害なCaO,MgO,BaO,SrOの巨大非
変形介在物を生成する。S,Oの同時規制下で有
効である。酸化物系介在物の変形化を促進し、
20μ以上の非変形介在物の生成を抑制し、かつ硫
化物サイズを小さくするためには0.0005%以上必
要である。0.005%超であると疲労の起点となる
20μ以上の巨大な非変形介在物が出現する。この
ように微量調整が重要ポイントである。この成分
系の鋼線材をパテンテイングする際、加熱温度を
900℃以上としない未溶解炭化物の発生は防止で
きない。しかし、1000℃を超えるとオーステナイ
ト結晶粒が粗大化し、絞りが劣化し放置処理をし
ても30%以上にならないので加熱温度を900〜
1000℃とした。 更に鉛浴温度570℃以上でないと伸線加工性の
良好な整つた形状の微細パーライト組織とならな
い。しかし、650℃を超えるとパテンテイング材
の強度が低くなり伸線加工しても200Kgf/mm2
上の高強度鋼線を得ることができないので、鉛浴
温度を570〜650℃とした。このようなパテンテイ
ング条件を行なつても直後の絞りは20〜30%であ
る。パテンテイング後、加熱時に吸収した水素を
放置もしくは加熱処理により放出する必要があ
る。この放置処理により絞りが30%以上となる。
水素の放出には温度と時間が重要なパラメーター
であることがわかつた。研究の結果、温度T
(℃)、時間t(hr)としてK=t×T/20が放置処理 温度、時間を決めるのに最も適しているパラメー
ターであることがわかつた。温度、時間を変えた
試験によりこのパラメーターが25以上であれば確
実に絞りが30%以上になつた。それ故、パラメー
ターKを25以上に限定した。Kが大きくなればな
るほど絞りは回復するが500程度で飽和する傾向
が見られる。それ故、Kの値は放置効果により絞
りを30%以上に回復させることができる25から効
果が飽和する500までとした。この放置もしくは
加熱処理は伸線後のばね特性にも影響を及ぼすの
で極めて重要である。パテンテイング後放置もし
くは加熱処理をすることが必要であり、伸線後の
放置もしくは加熱では絞りは回復しない。 伸線加工によりパテンテイング材は冷間加工さ
れ引張強さが上昇する。高炭素低合金鋼でも55%
以上の伸線加工を行わないとピアノ線B種SWP
―Bと同等以上の高強度ばね用鋼線の製造は不可
能である。しかし、伸線加工度を大きくすれば引
張強さは上昇するが、ねじり回数が20回以下に劣
化するので、伸線加工度を55〜99%とした。 〔実施例〕 次に本発明にかかる実施例を示す。実施例1は
成分の影響を見たものである。実施例1で使用し
た本発明鋼および比較鋼の化学成分を第1表に示
し、その鋼材を使用して試作したばね用鋼線の特
性一覧表を第2表に示す。第1表と第2表の記号
は対応している。第1表のAを使用して試作した
ばね用鋼線が第2表のAである。いずれも9.0mm
φ線材を950℃加熱後、590℃鉛浴に焼入れし、20
℃で48hr放置した。K=48である。その後伸線し
た。伸線各段の減面率はいずれも約20%とし、
4.0mmφ(減面率80%)まで伸線した。伸線後歪取
のため350℃×30min加熱を行つた。この状態で
特性を判定した。ねじり試験はスパン長400mm
(=100d)で行つた。未溶解炭化物の有無はね
じり試験後の破面より縦断面サンプルを切出し、
走査電子顕微鏡で1万倍以上の倍率でチエツクし
た。疲労試験は中村武回転曲げ疲労試験機を用い
てS―N曲線を書いて疲労限を求めた。また有限
疲労寿命域での破面をチエツクし、非金属介在物
の有無をチエツクした。水素脆性については促進
試験で評価した。3%H2SO4溶液中に浸漬し、
15mA/cm2の直流電流を流し強制的に水素チヤー
ジした。応力は60Kgf/mm2を負荷した。100時間
で破断が起こらないものを水素脆性がないと判断
した。耐熱性の評価のために350℃で、1000hr加
熱後の引張強さ残存率を調査した。なお、引張強
さ残存率は下記式により表される。 引張強さ残存率(%) =加熱後の引張強さ/加熱前の引張強さ×100 引張強さ残存率とばねのへたりは相関があり、
引張強さ残存率が大きいものほどへたりが少な
い。へたりを少なくするには引張強さ残存率を90
%以上にする必要がある。 第1表において記号A〜Rが本発明鋼であり、
X1〜X12が比較鋼である。本発明鋼はいずれ
も伸線繊維組織があり、引張強さが200Kgf/mm2
以上、ねじり回数20回以上、疲労限40Kgf/mm2
上、水素脆性無、引張強さ残存率90%以上であ
る。本発明鋼においてA,E,J,K,L,M,
NはCa,Mg,Ba,Srのうちの2元素添加、B,
C,H,IはCa,Mg,Na,Srのうちの3元素
添加、C,D,FはCa,Mg,Ba,Srの4元素
添加、OはCaの単独添加、PはMgの単独添加、
QはBaの単独加、RはSrの単独添加である。
Ca,Mg,Ba,Srは単独添加、複合添加のいず
れでも効果があることがわかる。比較鋼はいずれ
も引張強さは200Kgf/mm2以上であるが、ねじり
回数が20回以下、疲労限が40Kgf/mm2以下であ
る。本発明鋼の疲労破面には非変形介在物は検出
されていない。比較鋼のうちS,O,Ca,Mg,
Ba,Srが本発明の範囲外のものには疲労破面に
20μ以上の非変形介在物が存在した。X1はNが
0.0062%と高いのでねじり回数が13回と低い。X
3はPが0.040%と高く、X4はSが0.040%と高
いのでねじり回数が20回以下、疲労限が40Kgf/
mm2以下と低く、疲労破面に非変形介在物が見られ
る。またV,Wの入つたX7,X8については未
容解炭化物が見られ、ねじり回数が極めて低く、
未溶解炭化物のため疲労限も40Kgf/mm2以下と低
い。Sの高いX4、Oの高いX2、Ca,Mg,
Ba,Srの4元素添加でその合計が0.0055%のX
5、Ca,Mg,Baの3元素添加でその合計が
0.0056%のX9、Ba,Srの2元素添加でその合
計が0.0055%のX10、Caの単独添加で添加量が
0.0051%のX11、逆にCa,Mgの2元素添加で
その合計が0.0003%と低いX6、Ca,Mg,Ba,
Srの4元素添加でその合計が0.0004%と低いX1
2については疲労破面に20μ以上の非変形介在物
が検出され、疲労限が低くなつている。X7,X
8はSi―Cr系でないこともあり、引張強さ残存
率が90%以下である。また、本発明鋼A〜Rより
製造したばねにクロム電気めつきを行つたが促進
試験結果と同様に水素脆性による折損は発生しな
かつた。
[Industrial Application Field] The present invention is a piano wire class B SWP-B (JIS G3522)
The present invention relates to a high-strength spring steel wire that has excellent stiffness properties and hydrogen embrittlement properties and has a long spring life, and a method for manufacturing the same. [Prior art] Piano wire and hard steel wire are used as spring materials by cold wire drawing, and the tensile strength of spring steel wire after strain relief annealing after wire drawing is 160 to 200 Kgf at 4 mmφ. /
It was about mm2 . However, in order to reduce the weight and improve the reliability of springs, it is desired to increase the tension, reduce non-deformable inclusions, and improve the settling characteristics. As a means to solve these problems, high tensile strength wire rods of various component systems have been proposed. For example,
The low alloy steel containing Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, W, and V, "high carbon wire steel with high strength and toughness" shown in Publication No. 86211 and Noboru Yamakoshi et al.
A number of alloyed steels have been proposed since before, such as ``Effects of Addition of Alloying Elements on the Mechanical Properties of High Carbon Steel Wire'' published in Vol. 23, No. 3 (1973). However, although many component systems have been proposed, few have been industrially mass-produced. This is because the addition of alloying elements increases non-deformable inclusions and does not improve fatigue properties, and the patenting process is not successful, making it difficult to obtain a fine pearlite structure suitable for wire drawing. Among steel wires for springs, where fatigue and setness are particularly important, the size that requires weight reduction is relatively thick, 2 to 8 mmφ. High-strength steel wire has a higher strength than piano wire, which has the highest strength and is currently in practical use, and can be stably produced industrially.Also, there are applications where the operating atmosphere is 200 to 350℃, and it can be used at low temperatures for long periods of time. Unlike heat-resistant cold-drawn steel wire with little strength loss even when heated, and high-strength steel wire that is further quenched and tempered, spring steel wire has high strength and is less affected by hydrogen embrittlement during electroplating. is desired. [Problems to be Solved by the Invention] The present invention has been made in order to satisfy these conventional demands, and has been developed to provide a wire with heat-settling characteristics that is between that of piano wire and low-alloy steel oil-tempered wire. A further object of the present invention is to provide a high-strength spring steel wire that exhibits less hydrogen embrittlement during electroplating, and a method for manufacturing the same. [Means and effects for solving the problems] The gist of the means for solving the above problems is (1) specifying the component system, that is, combining Si and Cr to improve heat resistance and stiffness properties. We aim to improve In addition, O, S regulations are carried out, and one or more of Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr, singly or in combination, are
By adding 0.0005 to 0.005%, non-deformable inclusions are reduced to 20μ or less; (2) the steel wire has a drawn fiber structure with excellent stiffness properties and low hydrogen embrittlement; and (3) these steels This is a manufacturing method that combines wire composition, patenting conditions, post-patenting standing conditions, and a wire drawing method. Based on the outline of the means for solving the problems of the present invention as described above, the gist of the present invention is as follows. (1) C: 0.70 to 1.00% Si: 0.50 to 2.00% Mn: 0.40 to 0.70% Cr: 0.40 to 1.00% P: 0.025% or less, N: 0.005% or less In steel consisting of the balance iron and unavoidable impurities S: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0050% or less, Ca,
Contains 0.0005 to 0.005% of one or more of Mg, Ba, and Sr, singly or in total, and has a drawn fiber structure with non-deformable inclusions of 20 μ or less. Excellent stiffness properties and low hydrogen embrittlement. Steel wire for high strength springs. (2) C: 0.70 to 1.00% Si: 0.50 to 2.00% Mn: 0.40 to 0.70% Cr: 0.40 to 1.00% P: 0.025% or less N: 0.0050% or less In steel with balance iron and unavoidable impurities S: 0.015 % or less, O: 0.0050% or less, Ca,
900 to 1000 steel wire rods containing 0.0005 to 0.005% of one or more of Mg, Ba, and Sr, singly or in total, and with non-deformable inclusions of 20μ or less.
After heating to ℃, perform a patenting treatment in a lead bath or the like at 570 to 650℃, followed by conditions such that K=t×T/20 is 25 to 500 at temperature T (℃) and time t (hr). A method for manufacturing a high-strength spring steel wire having a wire drawing fiber structure, which comprises leaving it to stand or heating it to release hydrogen in the steel, and then drawing 55 to 95% of the wire. Conventional high-carbon, low-alloy steels have a high C content and also add Cr, V, and W, which tend to form carbides, slow pearlite transformation, and are prone to micro-segregation.
Mn was added in combination. This significantly impeded wire drawability. To prevent this, Mn was kept low and Si and Cr were combined as alloying elements. By combining Si, which does not form carbides, with a carbide-forming element, deterioration in wire drawability could be prevented. It was found that the combination of Si and Cr further improved heat resistance and stiffness properties. Fatigue is important in spring applications. In low-alloy steel, non-deformable inclusions serve as starting points for fatigue and significantly worsen fatigue life. In order to minimize non-deformed inclusions, we have found that controlling O and adding trace amounts of Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr are effective. As a result, the oxide-based inclusions become easily deformed, and those larger than 20 μm no longer appear, and the sulfide size of the deformed inclusions becomes smaller. This effect becomes more pronounced due to the S regulation. Fatigue life is determined by the propagation of cracks, and P was regulated to reduce the propagation speed. N was regulated to prevent toughness deterioration due to strain aging during strain relief annealing. Regulation of P and S will be even more effective. As a result of research into the reason why various low-alloy steels have been developed but have not been used industrially, an important fact has been discovered. These are the patenting conditions and the time from after patenting to wire drawing. Conventionally, little importance has been placed on the heating temperature during patenting. For low-alloy steels, it has been thought that it is best to perform pearlite transformation by quenching in a lead bath immediately after austenite transformation at the lowest possible temperature. This is because it was thought that crystal grain growth occurs after austenitization and that the reduction of area after pearlite transformation decreases. Although there was no problem with ordinary carbon steel, it was found that there was a serious problem with low alloy steel. When the austenitizing temperature is low, the reduction is high, but undissolved carbide of about 0.1 to 0.2 μ remains in most cases less than 1 μ. If these minute undissolved carbides remain, the toughness will be extremely deteriorated during strain relief annealing after wire drawing. This fact was discovered through a detailed study of the fiber structure after wire drawing. Therefore, we found it necessary to increase the heating temperature during patenting. Furthermore, even with a pearlite structure, if the isothermal transformation temperature is low, the pearlite lamellar structure is misaligned and sufficient wire drawability cannot be ensured. Therefore, the isothermal transformation temperature was regulated. It has thus been found that by increasing the heating temperature during patenting, the reduction of area immediately after patenting is low, but gradually recovers. This is due to hydrogen absorption during heating. It is almost negligible in carbon steel, but it is noticeable in low alloy steel. With low alloy steel, the reduction of area cannot be increased to 30% or more unless this is left or heat treated after the patenting process. Based on many years of research, K = temperature T (℃) and time t (hr).
It was found that it was necessary to leave or heat under conditions such that t×T/20 was 25 or more. The treatment is left at 20℃ for 25 hours or more. The time can be shortened by increasing the temperature. Lead patented material is wire-drawn to achieve a specified strength, but because the lower limit of the lead bath temperature is regulated, the tensile strength is low and unless wire-drawn to a level higher than 55%, the piano wire will be class B SWP-B. Unable to secure equivalent or higher tensile strength. The above lead bath may be any salt bath or the like. In addition, this wire drawing process forms a fibrous structure, which, in combination with the effects of the component system, results in a high-strength steel wire for springs that has excellent settling properties and less hydrogen embrittlement. The above is the basic idea of the present invention. Next, the reasons for limiting the chemical components, non-deformable inclusions, patenting conditions, post-patenting processing conditions, and wire drawing conditions of the present invention will be explained. C is a basic element for strength and microstructure. If the content is less than 0.70%, it is impossible to manufacture spring steel wire with a tensile strength equal to or higher than that of SWP-B.
C was 0.70% or more. When C exceeds 1.00%, Si,
Even with Cr-added steel, wire breakage during wire drawing due to reticulated cementite cannot be prevented, so the C content was set at 1.00% or less. Next is Si, and the hardening effect of ferrite becomes noticeable when Si is 0.50% or more. However, if it exceeds 2.00%, it is impossible to achieve a reduction of more than 30% no matter what patenting conditions are used, making wire drawing difficult. Mn is an element that prevents hot embrittlement and is 0.20%
Otherwise, the occurrence of surface flaws cannot be prevented. and,
In order to increase the tensile strength to 200Kgf/mm 2 or more, it is necessary to add 0.40% or more. Mn slows pearlite transformation and tends to undergo micro-segregation. Therefore,
The Mn content was set to 0.70% or less so that pearlite transformation, including micro-segregation parts, can be completed within 5 minutes of holding the lead bath. As mentioned above, by combining Si, which does not form carbides, and Cr, which is a carbide forming element, deterioration of wire drawability can be prevented, and heat resistance and set property are further improved. This effect can be obtained at Cr of 0.40~
It is in the range of 1.00%. P was set to 0.025% or less, at which the effect of reducing the crack propagation speed during fatigue is significant. S was set at 0.015% or less to prevent hot embrittlement and to expect refinement of sulfide size by adding Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr. O was set to 0.0050% or less, which can be modified into deformed inclusions by adding Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr. This reduces the size of non-deformed inclusions to 20μ or less. Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr are all elements that react with O and S, and have the same effect. Therefore, single addition and combined addition can be treated equally. It is also highly effective when added in small amounts. When added in large amounts, harmful giant undeformed inclusions of CaO, MgO, BaO, and SrO are formed. Effective under simultaneous regulation of S and O. Promotes deformation of oxide inclusions,
In order to suppress the formation of non-deformed inclusions of 20μ or more and to reduce the size of sulfides, 0.0005% or more is required. If it exceeds 0.005%, it becomes the starting point of fatigue.
Huge non-deformed inclusions larger than 20μ appear. In this way, fine adjustment is an important point. When patenting steel wire rods with this composition, the heating temperature is
The generation of undissolved carbides cannot be prevented unless the temperature exceeds 900°C. However, if the temperature exceeds 1000℃, the austenite crystal grains will become coarser, the drawing will deteriorate, and even if left untreated, the temperature will not exceed 30%, so the heating temperature should be adjusted to 900℃ or higher.
The temperature was 1000℃. Furthermore, unless the lead bath temperature is 570°C or higher, a well-shaped fine pearlite structure with good wire drawability cannot be obtained. However, if the temperature exceeds 650°C, the strength of the patenting material decreases and it is impossible to obtain a high-strength steel wire of 200 Kgf/mm 2 or more even by wire drawing, so the lead bath temperature was set at 570 to 650°C. Even under such patenting conditions, the aperture immediately after is 20 to 30%. After patenting, it is necessary to release the hydrogen absorbed during heating by leaving it to stand or by heat treatment. This leaving treatment increases the aperture to 30% or more.
It was found that temperature and time are important parameters for hydrogen release. As a result of research, the temperature T
(°C) and time t (hr), K=t×T/20 was found to be the most suitable parameter for determining the temperature and time of the standing treatment. Tests with varying temperatures and times showed that if this parameter was 25 or higher, the aperture was definitely 30% or higher. Therefore, the parameter K was limited to 25 or more. The larger K becomes, the more the aperture recovers, but there is a tendency for it to become saturated at around 500. Therefore, the value of K was set from 25, which allows the aperture to recover to 30% or more due to the effect of neglect, to 500, which saturates the effect. This leaving or heat treatment is extremely important as it also affects the spring properties after wire drawing. It is necessary to leave or heat the wire after patenting, and the drawing will not recover if it is left or heated after drawing. The wire drawing process cold-works the patented material and increases its tensile strength. 55% even in high carbon low alloy steel
If the above wire drawing process is not performed, piano wire B class SWP
- It is impossible to manufacture high-strength steel wire for springs that is equal to or higher than B. However, if the degree of wire drawing is increased, the tensile strength will increase, but the number of twists will deteriorate to 20 times or less, so the degree of wire drawing was set at 55 to 99%. [Example] Next, an example according to the present invention will be shown. Example 1 looks at the influence of ingredients. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the inventive steel and comparative steel used in Example 1, and Table 2 shows a list of properties of the spring steel wire prototyped using the steel materials. The symbols in Tables 1 and 2 correspond. The spring steel wire prototyped using A in Table 1 is A in Table 2. Both are 9.0mm
After heating the φ wire to 950℃, quenching it in a 590℃ lead bath,
It was left at ℃ for 48 hours. K=48. Then I drew the wire. The area reduction rate of each stage of wire drawing is approximately 20%,
Wire was drawn to 4.0mmφ (area reduction rate 80%). After wire drawing, heating was performed at 350°C for 30 minutes to remove strain. Characteristics were determined in this state. Torsion test span length 400mm
(=100d). The presence or absence of undissolved carbides was determined by cutting a longitudinal section sample from the fracture surface after the torsion test.
It was checked using a scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 10,000 times or more. For the fatigue test, a Takeshi Nakamura rotary bending fatigue testing machine was used to draw an S-N curve and determine the fatigue limit. We also checked the fracture surface in the finite fatigue life region to check for the presence of non-metallic inclusions. Hydrogen embrittlement was evaluated by accelerated testing. immersed in 3% H2SO4 solution ;
A DC current of 15 mA/cm 2 was applied to force hydrogen charge. A stress of 60 Kgf/mm 2 was applied. Those that did not break after 100 hours were judged to have no hydrogen embrittlement. To evaluate heat resistance, the tensile strength residual rate after heating at 350°C for 1000 hours was investigated. In addition, the tensile strength residual rate is expressed by the following formula. Tensile strength residual rate (%) = Tensile strength after heating / Tensile strength before heating x 100 There is a correlation between the tensile strength residual rate and spring fatigue.
The higher the residual tensile strength, the less the fatigue. To reduce fatigue, set the tensile strength residual rate to 90.
% or more. In Table 1, symbols A to R are the steels of the present invention,
X1 to X12 are comparative steels. All of the steels of the present invention have a drawn fiber structure and have a tensile strength of 200Kgf/mm 2
The number of twists is 20 times or more, the fatigue limit is 40 kgf/mm 2 or more, there is no hydrogen embrittlement, and the tensile strength residual rate is 90% or more. In the steel of the present invention, A, E, J, K, L, M,
N is the addition of two elements among Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr, B,
C, H, and I are added with three elements of Ca, Mg, Na, and Sr; C, D, and F are added with four elements of Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr; O is added with Ca alone; P is added with Mg alone. addition,
Q is the addition of Ba alone, and R is the addition of Sr alone.
It can be seen that Ca, Mg, Ba, and Sr are effective whether added alone or in combination. All comparative steels have a tensile strength of 200 Kgf/mm 2 or more, but the number of twists is 20 or less, and the fatigue limit is 40 Kgf/mm 2 or less. No non-deformed inclusions were detected on the fatigue fracture surface of the steel of the present invention. Among the comparative steels, S, O, Ca, Mg,
In cases where Ba and Sr are outside the scope of the present invention, fatigue fracture surfaces may be affected.
Non-deformed inclusions larger than 20μ were present. X1 is N
Since it is high at 0.0062%, the number of twists is low at 13 times. X
3 has a high P of 0.040%, and X4 has a high S of 0.040%, so the number of twists is less than 20 and the fatigue limit is 40Kgf/
It is low, less than mm 2 , and non-deformed inclusions are seen on the fatigue fracture surface. In addition, undissolved carbides are seen in X7 and X8 containing V and W, and the number of twists is extremely low.
Due to the undissolved carbide, the fatigue limit is also low at 40Kgf/mm 2 or less. X4 with high S, X2 with high O, Ca, Mg,
With the addition of four elements Ba and Sr, the total is 0.0055%
5. Addition of three elements, Ca, Mg, and Ba, increases the total
When adding 0.0056% of X9, two elements of Ba and Sr, the total amount is 0.0055% of X10, and when adding Ca alone, the amount of addition is
0.0051% of X11, conversely, with the addition of two elements Ca and Mg, the total is as low as 0.0003%, X6, Ca, Mg, Ba,
With the addition of four elements, Sr, the total is as low as 0.0004%
Regarding No. 2, non-deformed inclusions of 20μ or more were detected on the fatigue fracture surface, and the fatigue limit was low. X7,X
Since No. 8 is not Si-Cr based, its tensile strength residual rate is 90% or less. Further, when springs manufactured from the steels A to R of the present invention were subjected to chromium electroplating, no breakage due to hydrogen embrittlement occurred, as in the accelerated test results.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 実施例2は伸線条件の影響を見たものである。
使用した線材の化学成分はC:0.85%、Si:0.99
%、Mn:0.51%、Cr:0.50%、P:0.010%、
S:0.005%、O:0.0020%、N:0.0030%、
Ca:0.0008%、Mg:0.0005%である。9.0mmφ、
5.8mmφ線材を利用して伸線条件とばね用鋼線特
性を調査した。4.0mmφに伸線後の調査方法は実
施例1と同じである。b,f,gが本発明鋼であ
る。これは加熱温度900℃以上、鉛浴温度570℃以
上のパテンテイングであり、かつパテンテイング
後伸線までK25以上の放置処理をしている。4.0
mmφまでの減面率も80%である。歪取焼鈍後の引
張強さも約200Kgf/mm2であり、ねじり回数20回
以上、疲労限40Kgf/mm2以上である。a,c,
d,e,hが比較鋼である。aは加熱温度が850
℃と低く未溶解炭化物が出現しねじり回数が極め
て低い。cは鉛浴温度が565℃と低いため引張強
さは高いが、ねじり回数が低い。また疲労限も30
Kgf/mm2と低下している。d,eはパテンテイン
グ後の放置処理が少ないためねじり回数が20回以
下である。hはパテンテイング条件は満足してい
るが、伸線加工度不足のため引張強さが180Kg
f/mm2cm2あることと疲労限が35Kgf/mm2と目標に
達していない。
[Table] Example 2 examines the influence of wire drawing conditions.
The chemical composition of the wire used was C: 0.85%, Si: 0.99
%, Mn: 0.51%, Cr: 0.50%, P: 0.010%,
S: 0.005%, O: 0.0020%, N: 0.0030%,
Ca: 0.0008%, Mg: 0.0005%. 9.0mmφ,
The wire drawing conditions and spring steel wire properties were investigated using 5.8mmφ wire rod. The investigation method after wire drawing to 4.0 mmφ is the same as in Example 1. b, f, and g are the steels of the present invention. This is patenting at a heating temperature of 900℃ or higher and a lead bath temperature of 570℃ or higher, and after patenting, the wire is left at a temperature of K25 or higher until wire drawing. 4.0
The area reduction rate down to mmφ is also 80%. The tensile strength after strain relief annealing is also about 200 Kgf/mm 2 , the number of twists is 20 or more, and the fatigue limit is 40 Kgf/mm 2 or more. a, c,
d, e, and h are comparative steels. The heating temperature for a is 850
At low temperatures, undissolved carbides appear and the number of twists is extremely low. In case c, the lead bath temperature is as low as 565°C, so the tensile strength is high, but the number of twists is low. Also, the fatigue limit is 30
It has decreased to Kgf/ mm2 . In cases d and e, the number of twists is 20 times or less because there is little left processing after patenting. h satisfies the patenting conditions, but the tensile strength is 180 kg due to insufficient wire drawing.
f/mm 2 cm 2 and the fatigue limit was 35Kgf/mm 2 , which did not reach the target.

【表】【table】

【表】 実施例3は減面率をかえて引張強さの異なるば
ね用鋼線としての性能を試験したものである。使
用した線材の化学成分は、 C:0・87%、 Si:1.01%、 Mn:0.46%、 Cr:0.53%、 P:0.020%、 S:0.007%、 O:0.0030%、 N:0.0039%、 Ca:0.0002%、 Mg:0.0005% である。線材径は11.0mm、10.0mm、9.0mm及び8.0
mmの4種類を用いて4.0mmに伸線加工した。この
ときのパテンテイング条件、放置時間及びそれぞ
れ4種の伸線減面率、引張強さ、ねじり回数等を
第4表に示した。これから判るようにSWP―
B4.0mmの引張強さが185〜200Kgf/mm2に対し、
この中間レベルから更に高強度が得られているこ
とが判る。また、ねじり回数は伸線減面率84%ま
ではJIS規格で定められている20回を満足するも、
これ以上の減面率では急激に減少している。 次に、ばねとしての性能を確認するため昇温状
態での耐ヘタリ性及びばね耐久試験における時間
強度と、このときの耐ヘタリ性の試験を行つた。
ばね加工は汎用の自動成形機を用い5表に示すば
ね仕様で形成し、端面研削及び低温歪取焼鈍を施
した。このとき、高強度であるにも拘らず成形性
の不具合、加工時の折損等のトラブルは全くなく
良好なばねの加工ができた。ばねの試験のうち、
昇温時の耐ヘタリ性の確認のため、長時間加熱締
付試験を行つた。このときの条件として、ばね成
形後360℃、20分の低温歪取焼鈍の後、端面研削
を施した。試験は締付応力70Kgf/mm2一定とし
て、熱風循環炉中で150℃、200℃及び250℃で
64hrの長時間加熱締付けを行い、そのときの残留
せん断歪を測定した。その結果、第1図に示すよ
うに残留せん断歪は引張強さレベルにより差はあ
るが実用化されているSWP―Bよりも著しく優
れ高温になるほど差があり、250℃の場合で約50
%と少く、本鋼種の特長が現われている。 次に、ばねとして耐久性能の確認のため、ばね
疲労試験機を用いて1800r.p.m.で試験を行つた。
供試ばねは前記と同じばね仕様のばねを用いた。
低温歪取り焼鈍は360℃から420℃までの4条件を
選び、加熱時間はいずれも20min.とした。試験
条件は平均応力を60Kgf/mm2として、応力振幅を
かえて試験した。それぞれの応力振幅での試験本
数は4本として折損するまでの回数を調べた。な
お、107回まで折損しないばねはこの回数で中止
し、残留せん断歪を調べた。 また、各ばね共低温歪取焼鈍後シヨツトピーニ
ングを施し、更に250℃×15minの低温歪取焼鈍
を行つたが、いずれの装置も汎用の設備、通常の
条件である。但し、シヨツト粒は0.60mmカツトワ
イヤを用い、アークハイト0.35mmA、カバレージ
90%以上であつた。そこで、本発明鋼の特長をみ
るための比較鋼線として、高強度弁ばね用ピアノ
線(ばね技術研究会編、ばね論文集25号、線径
4.0mm、引張強さ189Kgf/mm2、 360×20min.の低温歪取焼鈍を施す)に対し、
4種類の引張強さのものいずれも107回における
耐久限(以下、単に耐久限とする)が優れている
ことが判る(第2図)。また、耐久限で試験を停
止した未折損ばねの残留せん断歪と応力振幅の関
係を引張強さ別にみると第6表の如くなり、比較
材の同応力レベルと比較すると、およそ10分の1
とばねのヘタリ特性に著しく特長が現われてい
る。
[Table] In Example 3, the performance as a spring steel wire with different area reduction ratios and different tensile strengths was tested. The chemical composition of the wire rod used was: C: 0.87%, Si: 1.01%, Mn: 0.46%, Cr: 0.53%, P: 0.020%, S: 0.007%, O: 0.0030%, N: 0.0039%, Ca: 0.0002%, Mg: 0.0005%. Wire diameter is 11.0mm, 10.0mm, 9.0mm and 8.0
The wire was drawn to 4.0 mm using four types of mm. Table 4 shows the patenting conditions, standing time, wire drawing area reduction ratio, tensile strength, number of twists, etc. of each of the four types. As you will see, SWP―
The tensile strength of B4.0mm is 185-200Kgf/ mm2 ,
It can be seen that even higher strength is obtained from this intermediate level. In addition, the number of twists satisfies the 20 twists specified by the JIS standard until the wire drawing area reduction rate is 84%.
If the area reduction rate is higher than this, the area will decrease rapidly. Next, in order to confirm the performance as a spring, tests were conducted on the resistance to set in a heated state, the time strength in a spring durability test, and the resistance to set in this time.
The spring was formed using a general-purpose automatic forming machine with the spring specifications shown in Table 5, and subjected to end face grinding and low-temperature strain relief annealing. At this time, despite the high strength, there were no problems such as poor formability or breakage during processing, and a good spring could be processed. Of the spring tests,
A long-term heating tightening test was conducted to confirm the resistance to set in temperature at elevated temperatures. The conditions at this time were that after spring forming, low-temperature strain relief annealing was performed at 360°C for 20 minutes, and then end face grinding was performed. The test was conducted at 150℃, 200℃ and 250℃ in a hot air circulation oven with a constant tightening stress of 70Kgf/ mm2 .
Heat tightening was performed for a long time of 64 hours, and the residual shear strain at that time was measured. As a result, as shown in Figure 1, the residual shear strain is significantly superior to that of SWP-B, which is in practical use, although it differs depending on the tensile strength level.
%, which shows the features of this steel grade. Next, in order to confirm the durability performance as a spring, a test was conducted at 1800 rpm using a spring fatigue tester.
The test spring used was a spring with the same spring specifications as above.
Four conditions were selected for low-temperature strain relief annealing from 360°C to 420°C, and the heating time was 20 min. The test conditions were an average stress of 60 kgf/mm 2 and the stress amplitude was changed. The number of test pieces at each stress amplitude was four, and the number of times until breakage was investigated. In addition, for springs that did not break until 107 times, the test was stopped after this number of times, and the residual shear strain was examined. In addition, each spring was subjected to low-temperature strain relief annealing, shot peening, and further low-temperature strain relief annealing at 250°C for 15 minutes, using general-purpose equipment and normal conditions. However, the shot grain uses 0.60mm cut wire, arc height 0.35mmA, coverage
It was over 90%. Therefore, as a comparative steel wire to examine the features of the steel of the present invention, we used a piano wire for high-strength valve springs (edited by the Spring Technology Study Group, Spring Papers No. 25, wire diameter
4.0mm, tensile strength 189Kgf/mm 2 , low temperature strain relief annealing at 360×20min),
It can be seen that all of the four types of tensile strength have excellent durability limits (hereinafter simply referred to as durability limits) after 10 7 cycles (Figure 2). Table 6 shows the relationship between the residual shear strain and stress amplitude of unbroken springs whose test was stopped at the durability limit, by tensile strength.
There are remarkable features in the stiffness characteristics of the spring.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 実施例4は細径で高強度を目的としたばね用鋼
線で特に、耐ヘタリ性を重視し、高応力下での時
間強度を必要とするような場合である。成分は実
施例3と同じもので、線径7.0mmでパテンテイン
グを施し、前記実施例にあるような放置を行つて
2.0mmに伸線した。このときのパテンテイング条
件、放置時間及び伸線減面率を第7表に示した。
その結果を第8表に示すように引張強さ271Kg
f/mm2、ねじり回数21回のものが得られた。この
ようにSWP―B(205〜225Kgf/mm2)を大幅に上
回り、靭性もある高強度鋼線が得られた。これを
第9表に示す圧縮ばねを製作し、ばねの疲労試験
を行つた。実施例3と同様に汎用の自動成形機を
用いてばね加工を行つたが高強度であるにも拘ら
ず折損等のトラブルはみられなかつた。疲労試験
は、端面研削処理後、400℃で15分の低温歪取焼
鈍を行つたのち、シヨツトピーニングを施し、更
に、低温焼鈍を225℃×110min.行つた。シヨツ
トピーニング条件は、0.60mmカツトワイヤーを用
い、アークハイト0.35mmA、カバレージ95%以上
とした。疲労試験は平均応力80Kgf/mm2、応力振
幅45Kgf/mm2で実施し、平均寿命で6×106、5
×106時での平均残留せん断歪は0.008%であつ
た。
[Table] Example 4 is a steel wire for springs that is small in diameter and aimed at high strength, particularly in cases where resistance to set is important and time strength under high stress is required. The ingredients were the same as in Example 3, the wire diameter was 7.0 mm, patented, and left as in the previous example.
The wire was drawn to 2.0mm. The patenting conditions, standing time, and wire drawing area reduction rate at this time are shown in Table 7.
As shown in Table 8, the tensile strength was 271Kg.
f/mm 2 and twisted 21 times. In this way, a high-strength steel wire with toughness significantly higher than SWP-B (205 to 225 Kgf/mm 2 ) was obtained. Compression springs shown in Table 9 were manufactured from this, and fatigue tests were conducted on the springs. As in Example 3, spring processing was carried out using a general-purpose automatic forming machine, but despite the high strength, no troubles such as breakage were observed. In the fatigue test, after the end face grinding treatment, low-temperature strain relief annealing was performed at 400°C for 15 minutes, shot peening was performed, and further low-temperature annealing was performed at 225°C for 110 minutes. The shot peening conditions were a 0.60 mm cut wire, an arc height of 0.35 mm A, and a coverage of 95% or more. The fatigue test was conducted at an average stress of 80Kgf/mm 2 and a stress amplitude of 45Kgf/mm 2 , with an average life of 6×10 6 , 5
The average residual shear strain at ×10 6 hours was 0.008%.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 実施例5は本鋼種が耐熱、耐ヘタリ性を有し
て、かつめつきが可能な冷間引抜鋼線としての例
である。一般にばね鋼線のうち、ステンレス鋼線
を除いて炭素鋼線や低合金鋼線の場合、その欠点
である耐食性の改善のためにばね加工後めつきの
必要性が生ずる。現在この目的のためピアノ線や
硬鋼線にはばね加工後電気亜鉛めつきが最も一般
的に実施されている。しかし、耐熱性、耐ヘタリ
性を有して、かつ高強度材としてはSi―Cr鋼オ
イルテンパー線(SWOSC―V)が最も一般的で
あるが、これを耐食性改善のために、やむを得ず
めつきを施して使用している例がある。周知の如
くオイルテンパー線は熱処理鋼線であるが故に、
めつき前処理、電気めつき工程を通じて水素脆性
が生じ易く一般には避けるべきであるとJISでも
解説されている。 このことは現在、耐熱性、耐ヘタリ性を有して
いる材料でばね加工後の電気めつきが実用的に可
能な材料はないことを示している。即ち低合金鋼
でかつ高強度であり、ピアノ線B種と同等又はそ
れ以上の引張強さをもつ高強度材が実用化されて
いないことによる。そこで、本鋼種を用いて電気
めつきを施したばねの疲労試験によりめつき脆性
の確認を行つた。 供試材は、実施例3で示した最も引張強さの高
い220Kgf/mm2材について試験した。これは高強
度材程めつきの影響が顕著に現われることを予想
したものである。実施例3で示したばね仕様でば
ね成形加工後、同条件で低温歪取焼鈍を施したば
ねを供試材とした。この供試ばねの亜鉛めつき工
程は第3図に示すように、現在実用化されている
厚めつきである10μを目的に亜鉛めつきを施して
後、試験を行つた。比較材として、めつき脆性の
確認のため、めつきを施さない低温歪取焼鈍のま
まのばねを用いた。結果は第4図に示す如く疲労
限に差はなく、現在実用化されているピアノ線や
硬鋼線と同じ傾向であつて十分実用に耐え得るこ
とが判る。 実施例5は実施例4で述べたオイルテンパー線
との比較で、如何にめつき脆性がなく高応力に耐
えるばねの実用化が可能であるかを試験したもの
である。比較鋼線は、現在最も太径で高強度が得
られ実用化されているSi―Cr鋼オイルテンパー
線とした。現在このSi―Cr鋼オイルテンパー線
でめつきの要望があるも、めつき脆性から実用化
できず塗装に依存しているのが現状である。 供試材は8.0mmと太径を選んだ。化学成分は実
施例3と同じ鋼番を使用し、第10表に示す製造条
件で製品化した。同じ8.0mmの比較鋼線としてSi
―Cr鋼オイルテンパー線182Kgf/mm2、ピアノ線
B種相当175Kgf/mm2を用いて第5図に示すばね
仕様でばね加工、及びめつきを施した。なお、め
つきの影響をみるため、めつき前後のばねで比較
試験も行つた。 試験は、100rpmで平均応力60Kgf/mm2、応力
振幅45Kgf/mm2でばねの折損までのくりかえし回
数を求めた。その結果、第6図に示すように冷間
引抜鋼線である本鋼種とピアノ線B種(相当)は
めつきの有無にかかわらず差がないが、オイルテ
ンパー線の場合めつきによる脆性がみられる。
[Table] Example 5 is an example of a cold-drawn steel wire in which this steel type has heat resistance and set resistance, and can be attached. In general, among spring steel wires, excluding stainless steel wires, carbon steel wires and low alloy steel wires require plating after spring processing in order to improve their corrosion resistance, which is a drawback. Currently, for this purpose, piano wire and hard steel wire are most commonly electrogalvanized after spring processing. However, Si-Cr steel oil-tempered wire (SWOSC-V) is the most common material that has heat resistance, fatigue resistance, and high strength; There are examples where it is used with As is well known, oil tempered wire is a heat-treated steel wire, so
JIS also explains that hydrogen embrittlement is likely to occur during plating pretreatment and electroplating processes and should generally be avoided. This indicates that there is currently no material that is heat resistant and resistant to set and can be practically electroplated after spring processing. That is, this is because a high-strength material that is made of low-alloy steel and has high strength, and has a tensile strength equal to or higher than class B piano wire, has not been put into practical use. Therefore, we conducted a fatigue test on springs electroplated using this steel type to confirm the brittleness of plating. The test material was the material shown in Example 3 with the highest tensile strength of 220 Kgf/mm 2 . This was based on the expectation that the effects of glare would be more pronounced in higher strength materials. A spring that was formed according to the spring specifications shown in Example 3 and then subjected to low-temperature strain relief annealing under the same conditions was used as a test material. As shown in Figure 3, the test spring was galvanized to a thickness of 10μ, which is currently in practical use, and then tested. As a comparison material, in order to confirm the brittleness of plating, a spring that had been subjected to low-temperature strain relief annealing without plating was used. As shown in Fig. 4, the results show that there is no difference in the fatigue limit, which shows the same tendency as the piano wire and hard steel wire that are currently in practical use, and is sufficiently durable for practical use. Example 5 is a comparison with the oil tempered wire described in Example 4 to test whether it is possible to put into practical use a spring that is free from plating brittleness and can withstand high stress. The comparison steel wire was an oil-tempered Si-Cr steel wire, which is currently in practical use and has the largest diameter and highest strength. Although there is currently a demand for plating with this Si-Cr steel oil-tempered wire, it cannot be put to practical use due to the brittleness of plating, and the current situation is that it relies on painting. The sample material was chosen to have a large diameter of 8.0 mm. The chemical composition used was the same steel number as in Example 3, and the product was manufactured under the manufacturing conditions shown in Table 10. Si as the same 8.0mm comparison steel wire
- Spring processing and plating were performed using 182 kgf/mm 2 Cr steel oil tempered wire and 175 kgf/mm 2 equivalent to class B piano wire according to the spring specifications shown in Figure 5. In addition, in order to examine the effects of plating, a comparative test was also conducted with springs before and after plating. The test was conducted at 100 rpm with an average stress of 60 Kgf/mm 2 and a stress amplitude of 45 Kgf/mm 2 to determine the number of repetitions until the spring broke. As a result, as shown in Figure 6, there is no difference between this steel type, which is a cold-drawn steel wire, and piano wire type B (equivalent), regardless of the presence or absence of plating, but in the case of oil-tempered wire, brittleness due to plating is observed. .

【表】 以上述べてきたように、本発明が如何にすぐれ
た高強度ばね用鋼線およびその製造方法であるか
がわかる。本発明によれば、成分系ばかりでなく
パテンテイング条件、パテンテイング後の放置も
しくは加熱処理、伸線加工の組み合わせにより高
炭素低合金鋼でも工業的に安定製造可能である。
[Table] As described above, it can be seen how excellent the present invention is as a high-strength spring steel wire and a manufacturing method thereof. According to the present invention, even high carbon, low alloy steel can be produced stably industrially by combining not only the component system but also the patenting conditions, standing or heat treatment after patenting, and wire drawing.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は本発明鋼線と比較鋼線の加熱温度と残
留せん断歪の関係を示したものである。A,B,
C,Dが本発明鋼線、E,Fが比較鋼線である。
第2図は本発明鋼線と比較鋼線の応力振幅とくり
かえし数の関係を見たものである。A,B,C,
Dが本発明鋼線、Gが比較鋼線である。第3図は
電気亜鉛めつき工程とその条件を示したものであ
る。第4図は本発明鋼のめつきの有無を比較した
S―N線図である。第5図はばねの成形からめつ
き処理までの工程を示したものである。第6図は
本発明鋼と比較材として使用した比較鋼線2種の
めつきの有無による時間強度の比較を示したもの
である。
FIG. 1 shows the relationship between heating temperature and residual shear strain for the steel wire of the present invention and the comparative steel wire. A, B,
C and D are steel wires of the present invention, and E and F are comparison steel wires.
FIG. 2 shows the relationship between the stress amplitude and the number of repetitions of the steel wire of the present invention and the comparison steel wire. A, B, C,
D is the steel wire of the present invention, and G is the comparison steel wire. FIG. 3 shows the electrogalvanizing process and its conditions. FIG. 4 is an SN diagram comparing the presence and absence of plating of the steel of the present invention. FIG. 5 shows the steps from forming the spring to plating. FIG. 6 shows a comparison of the time strength of the present invention steel and two comparative steel wires used as comparative materials, with and without plating.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 C:0.70〜1.00% Si:0.50〜2.00% Mn:0.40〜0.70% Cr:0.40〜1.00% P:0.025%以下 N:0.0050%以下 残部鉄および不可避的不純物よりなる鋼におい
て S:0.015%以下、O:0.0050%以下、Ca,
Mg,Ba,Srのうちの1種もしくは2種以上を単
独又は合計で0.0005〜0.005%を含み、非変形介
在物を20μ以下とした伸線繊維組織を有するヘタ
リ特性に優れた水素脆性の少ない高強度ばね用鋼
線。 2 C:0.70〜1.00% Si:0.50〜2.00% Mn:0.40〜0.70% Cr:0.40〜1.00% P:0.025%以下 N:0.0050%以下 残部鉄および不可避的不純物よりなる鋼におい
て S:0.015%以下、O:0.0050%以下、Ca,
Mg,Ba,Srのうちの1種もしくは2種以上を単
独又は合計で0.0005〜0.005%を含み、非変形介
在物を20μ以下とした鋼線材を900〜1000℃に加
熱後、570〜650℃の鉛浴などでパテンテイング処
理を行い、続いて、温度T(℃)、時間t(hr)と
してK=t×T/20が25〜500となるような条件で放 置もしくは加熱して鋼中の水素を放出後、55〜95
%の伸線加工を行うことを特徴とする伸線繊維組
織を有する高強度ばね用鋼線の製造方法。
[Claims] 1 C: 0.70 to 1.00% Si: 0.50 to 2.00% Mn: 0.40 to 0.70% Cr: 0.40 to 1.00% P: 0.025% or less N: 0.0050% or less Steel consisting of balance iron and inevitable impurities In S: 0.015% or less, O: 0.0050% or less, Ca,
Contains 0.0005 to 0.005% of one or more of Mg, Ba, and Sr, singly or in total, and has a drawn fiber structure with non-deformable inclusions of 20 μ or less. Excellent stiffness properties and low hydrogen embrittlement. Steel wire for high strength springs. 2 C: 0.70-1.00% Si: 0.50-2.00% Mn: 0.40-0.70% Cr: 0.40-1.00% P: 0.025% or less N: 0.0050% or less In steel with balance iron and inevitable impurities S: 0.015% or less , O: 0.0050% or less, Ca,
A steel wire containing 0.0005 to 0.005% of one or more of Mg, Ba, and Sr alone or in total and with non-deformable inclusions of 20 μ or less is heated to 900 to 1000 °C and then heated to 570 to 650 °C. Patenting treatment is performed in a lead bath or the like, and then the steel is left to stand or heated under conditions such that K=t×T/20 is 25 to 500 at a temperature T (°C) and a time t (hr). After releasing hydrogen, 55-95
1. A method for producing a high-strength spring steel wire having a drawn fiber structure, which comprises performing a wire drawing process of 10%.
JP30174486A 1986-12-19 1986-12-19 High strength steel wire for spring and its production Granted JPS63227748A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP30174486A JPS63227748A (en) 1986-12-19 1986-12-19 High strength steel wire for spring and its production

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP30174486A JPS63227748A (en) 1986-12-19 1986-12-19 High strength steel wire for spring and its production

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63227748A JPS63227748A (en) 1988-09-22
JPH0430462B2 true JPH0430462B2 (en) 1992-05-21

Family

ID=17900640

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP30174486A Granted JPS63227748A (en) 1986-12-19 1986-12-19 High strength steel wire for spring and its production

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS63227748A (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2790303B2 (en) * 1989-02-17 1998-08-27 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method of manufacturing high fatigue strength spring and steel wire used for the method
JPH046211A (en) * 1990-04-25 1992-01-10 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of steel wire for spring having excellent fatigue strength
EP1347069B1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2007-11-07 Nippon Steel Corporation High-strength spring steel and spring steel wire
JP3851095B2 (en) 2001-02-07 2006-11-29 新日本製鐵株式会社 Heat-treated steel wire for high-strength springs
JP4217245B2 (en) 2006-01-20 2009-01-28 株式会社神戸製鋼所 High strength steel with excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance
US8845825B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2014-09-30 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation High strength spring-use heat treated steel
BR122015020249B1 (en) 2006-12-28 2016-07-26 Kobe Steel Ltd steel wire rod and spring calmed with itself
EP2123784B1 (en) 2006-12-28 2012-07-11 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho Si KILLED STEEL WIRE MATERIAL HAVING EXCELLENT FATIGUE PROPERTY AND SPRING
JP6168132B2 (en) * 2015-11-27 2017-07-26 新日鐵住金株式会社 Hot-dip galvanized steel wire with excellent twisting characteristics
CN106048451A (en) * 2016-07-06 2016-10-26 安徽红桥金属制造有限公司 Wear-resistant alloy spring steel and thermal treatment process thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63227748A (en) 1988-09-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN100445408C (en) Steel wire for high-strength springs and high-strength springs with excellent workability
JP3940270B2 (en) Method for producing high-strength bolts with excellent delayed fracture resistance and relaxation resistance
US7789974B2 (en) High-strength spring steel wire
KR100336339B1 (en) Steel wire for high-strength springs and method of producing the same
CN104797729B (en) High-strength spring steel wire excellent in hydrogen embrittlement resistance, method for producing same, and high-strength spring
US5286312A (en) High-strength spring steel
CN1327024C (en) Steel wire for hard drawn spring excellent in fatigue strength and resistance to settling, and hard drawn spring
JP2012041587A (en) Wire for machine part excellent in high strength and hydrogen embrittlement resistance characteristic, steel wire, and the machine part and method for manufacturing the same
EP1347072A1 (en) Steel wire rod for hard drawn spring, drawn wire rod for hard drawn spring and hard drawn spring, and method for producing hard drawn spring
WO2005083141A1 (en) High strength bolt excellent in characteristics of resistance to delayed fracture and resistance to relaxation
JP3246210B2 (en) High strength and high toughness hot-dip coated steel wire and method for producing the same
JPH0430462B2 (en)
CN111910134A (en) High-strength high-toughness spring steel for high-temperature and high-pressure conditions and production method thereof
JP2001220650A (en) Steel wire, spring, and method for producing them
JP4097151B2 (en) High strength spring steel wire and high strength spring with excellent workability
JP3793391B2 (en) High strength bolt excellent in delayed fracture resistance with a tensile strength of 1300 MPa or more and method for producing the same
US5904830A (en) Process for finishing steelwire
CN111690875B (en) A kind of spring steel with good heat resistance and shock resistance and its production method
JP3283332B2 (en) High-strength ultrafine steel wire with excellent stranded wire workability and method for producing the same
JP2004307929A (en) Bolt with excellent hydrogen embrittlement resistance and method of manufacturing the same
JP2005281860A (en) High-strength bolts with excellent delayed fracture resistance and relaxation resistance
JP3648192B2 (en) High strength PC steel bar with excellent delayed fracture resistance and manufacturing method
JP2002180201A (en) Steel for hard-drawn wire having excellent fatigue strength and ductility, and hard-drawn wire
JP2004300481A (en) Steel wire for spring having excellent settling resistance and crack resistance
JP4062612B2 (en) Steel wire for hard springs and hard springs with excellent fatigue strength and sag resistance

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term