JPH0431003B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0431003B2
JPH0431003B2 JP2682587A JP2682587A JPH0431003B2 JP H0431003 B2 JPH0431003 B2 JP H0431003B2 JP 2682587 A JP2682587 A JP 2682587A JP 2682587 A JP2682587 A JP 2682587A JP H0431003 B2 JPH0431003 B2 JP H0431003B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
slag
furnace
dephosphorization
hot metal
converter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
JP2682587A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS63195214A (en
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed filed Critical
Priority to JP2682587A priority Critical patent/JPS63195214A/en
Publication of JPS63195214A publication Critical patent/JPS63195214A/en
Publication of JPH0431003B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0431003B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)
  • Carbon Steel Or Casting Steel Manufacturing (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

<産業上の利用分野> この発明は、2基の転炉形式の炉を使用し一方
の炉で脱燐した溶銑を他方の炉で脱炭する製鋼工
程において、脱燐銑を一旦取鍋に出湯する際の発
煙を防止して良好な作業性並びに環境保全を確保
する方法に関するものである。 <従来技術とその問題点> 近年、各種鋼材に対する品質要求は日増しに高
度化しており、これにともなつて製鋼法にも各種
の工夫が試みられ、様々な新しい手法が導入され
てきた。 このような中にあつて、最近、低燐鋼をより一
層低いコストで安定溶製する手段の開発に大きな
期待が寄せられるようになり、その実現に向けて
多くの研究が積み重ねられている。 ところで、製鋼トータルコストのミニマム化や
低燐鋼の安定溶製に関しては、従来、次のような
溶銑の予備脱燐法が提案され、一部実用化もなさ
れている。即ち、 トーピードカー内の溶銑に生石灰系の脱燐剤
又はソーダ灰をインジエクシヨンすることで予
備脱燐を行う方法、 取鍋内の溶銑に生石灰系のフラツクスをイン
ジエクシヨンしたりブラステイング(吹き付
け)することで予備脱燐を行う方法、 高炉鋳床樋中で溶銑に生石灰系のフラツクス
をブラステイングして予備脱燐を行う方法。 しかしながら、前記)及び)の方法による
と比較的低い到達P含有量レベルを達成すること
はできるが、脱燐を“脱燐剤の浮上過程で進行す
る反応(トランジトリー・リアクター・リアクシ
ヨン)”に頼るため脱燐フラツクスの利用効率が
必ずしも良くなく、また処理時間が長くかかる分
だけ処理時の抜熱が大きくなつて溶銑温度が低下
すると言う問題があり、一方、前記)の方法で
は処理後の溶銑温度を先の2つの方法より高く保
つことができるが、脱燐処理が高炉から出銑され
た直後の溶銑に施される関係上、脱燐処理温度が
高過ぎて到達P含有量レベルそのものが前記)
及び)の方法よりも悪くなるとの不都合があつ
て何れも決して満足できるものではなかつた。 その上、溶銑脱燐フラツクスとして生石灰等を
用いる場合には、その後の転炉吹錬で使用される
生石灰等の量をも合わせて考えると、前記いずれ
の方法によつても“該予備脱燐工程を省いて転炉
のみでの脱燐を行う方法”に比べて必要造滓剤量
(生石灰等の量)はそれほど大きく低減されない
ことも指摘されていたのである。 そこで、“製鋼コストに大きく影響する造滓剤
使用量を極力抑えることが可能で、しかも格別に
新規な設備を必要とすることなく品質の良好な鋼
を高能率生産し得る方法を開発すること”の必要
性を強く認識した本出願人は、 「全製鋼工程を通じての造滓剤の必要量はスラ
グとメタルとを向流的に接触させる“スラグ−メ
タル向流精錬”によるときが最も少なくて良い
が、実際上は該向流精錬の完全な実現は殆ど不可
能であり、現状において最も労少なく造滓剤の使
用量を抑え得る可能性を秘めた製鋼手段として挙
げ得るものは、脱燐工程を2段階に分割してその
下工程で発生するスラグを上工程の脱燐剤として
使用する方法(即ち、溶銑脱燐用フラツクスの主
成分として転炉滓を用いる方法であつて、例えば
本出願人が先に特公昭55−30042号として提案し
たところの“転炉滓を炉外精錬での溶銑脱燐フラ
ツクスとして再利用する方法”に代表されるも
の)である」 との基礎的研究結果を踏まえ、しかも 「これまでに提案された転炉滓再利用による製
鋼法は、炉外精錬を併用することもあつて効率の
良い作業条件を安定して確保するのが非常に困難
である上、脱燐効率も期待されるほどには高くな
く、また量産のためには格別の排ガス集塵機や脱
燐スラグの排滓設備を必要とするなど、高品質鋼
の量産手段としては今一歩躊躇されるものでしか
ない」 と言う実作業上の問題点にも着目した上で、次に
示す如き新規な製鋼方法を提案した(特願昭61−
132517号)。 即ち、第2図に示したように、 『上下両吹き機能を有した2基の転炉形式の炉
を使用すると共に、そのうちの一方を脱燐炉1、
他方を脱炭炉2とし、脱燐炉1内へ注入した溶銑
3に脱炭炉2で発生した転炉滓4を主成分とする
精錬剤の添加を行い、攪拌ガス吹き込みノズル5
による底吹きガス攪拌を実施しつつランス6より
酸素ガスを上吹きして脱燐炉1の溶銑3の温度を
1400℃以下に保ちながら溶銑脱燐を行つた後、得
られた脱燐溶銑を脱炭炉2にて脱炭する方法』で
ある。そして、この方法によると、極めて少ない
量の造滓剤でもつて通常燐レベルの鋼或いは低燐
鋼を作業性良く低コストで製造することが可能と
なつた。 なお、上記方法による利点の主なものを具体的
に列挙すると次の通りである。 転炉滓を溶銑脱燐フラツクスとして用いる
“2段向流精錬”であるため、全製鋼工程での
生石灰使用量が従来法に比べて大幅に減少し、
低燐鋼を極めて少ない生石灰量で吹錬すること
を可能とする。 転炉滓中のFeOの有効利用がなされ、粒鉄や
地金の回収率が向上する。 一般に、脱炭炉でマンガン鉱石や鉄マンガン
鉱石を使用した場合にはこれらの約半分はMn
にまで還元されずに酸化物としてスラグ中に残
るが、この発明の方法においては、該スラグを
溶銑脱燐フラツクスとして再使用するので上記
残留鉱石の有効利用がなされ、溶銑における
“[Mn]ロスの軽減”或いは“[Mn]上昇”に
役立つ。 使用する炉が転炉形式の炉であるので、例え
ば脱燐炉の場合でも、出鋼口から脱燐銑のみを
鍋中へ出銑してから炉内のスラグを溶滓鍋に排
出でき、他の脱燐法におけるよりも除滓が簡単
である。 使用する炉が上下両吹き機能を有した転炉形
式の炉であるので溶銑の強攪拌が出来て短時間
処理が可能となり、従つて抜熱量が少なく、他
の脱燐処理法に比して熱経済上極めて有利であ
る。特に溶融転炉滓を用いる場合にはその顕熱
分だけ更に熱経済的に有利となる。 脱燐炉で発生するスラグは、遊離石灰が少な
いため(フリーのCaOが1%以下)であるので
路盤材としての有効利用も可能である。 使用する炉が2つであるので、炉体に付着す
るP2O5に起因した脱燐不良の懸念は全くない。
つまり、脱燐炉では高P2O5のスラグが、そし
て脱炭炉では低P2O5スラグしか付着しないの
で脱炭炉での脱燐不良が起こらない。 しかも、溶融転炉滓を使用する場合には、脱
燐炉では溶銑を装入した後に溶融転炉滓が入れ
られるので、急激な爆発的反応が起きる心配が
ない。 底吹きガス攪拌を行いつつ脱燐を行うので、
従来の溶銑脱燐法の場合のように脱燐剤を粉状
近くにまで細かく粉砕しておく必要がなく、そ
の分のコスト低減が可能となる。 遊休転炉がある場合には、これを直ちに脱燐
炉として使うことが出来、格別な設備を準備す
る必要がない。また、例えば転炉1/2基操業を
行つている工場の場合には、一方の炉を脱燐炉
とし、転炉2/2基操業のような形で、設備投資
なくこの発明の実施が可能である。そして、レ
ンガ寿命のために何れか一方を築炉する必要が
生じた場合にはこの間だけ転炉1基のみで従来
の転炉吹錬を行つて遊休炉を出さない方策も講
じられ、非常に柔軟性に富んだ精錬が可能であ
る。 上述のように、本出願人が先に提案した“転炉
形式の2基の炉を使用する製鋼方法”には極めて
多くの利点があり、特に低燐鋼の製造手段として
優れた効果を得られるものであつたが、その後の
多くの実際操業を通じた更なる検討の中から、新
たに次のような改善すべき問題点が認識されるに
至つたのである。 即ち、転炉形式の脱燐炉と脱炭炉とを使用して
製鋼を行う場合には、当然のことながら脱燐銑を
脱炭炉に注湯する工程を欠くことができないが、
そのために炉を傾倒させて脱燐銑を一旦取鍋中へ
出湯しようとすると、炉の傾動に伴つて溶銑上に
浮かんでいるスラグ層が先ず炉の出湯孔部分を通
過し、続いて溶銑層が該出湯孔に達して出銑が行
われることとなる。従つて、僅かではあるが前記
出湯孔からスラグが取鍋中に流出するのを阻止す
ることが出来ない。ところが、転炉形式の脱燐炉
で溶銑脱燐を実施する場合には、スラグに脱燐能
を付与するためにスラグ中の酸素、つまり
(FeO)は3〜10%程度(スラグ塩基度が2程度)
に高くコントロールされている。しかも、出湯さ
れる溶湯はC含有量が4%前後と高い脱燐溶銑で
ある。そのため、脱燐銑の出湯時には取鍋中に流
出した前記スラグは溶銑流により攪拌されながら
これと接触するので、スラグ中の酸素(FeOの形
態)と溶銑中の炭素とが激しく反応してCOガス
を吹き上げることとなり、この激しいCOガス吹
上げ流にスラグの微粒子や酸化鉄等が巻き上げら
れて“発煙現象”を呈し、これが作業環境上極め
て重大な悪影響を及ぼすと言う問題点である。 勿論、発煙対策として集塵設備を強化すれば発
煙現象による悪影響は回避できると考えられる
が、このような対策では設備費の上昇を招いて製
鋼コストの低減を狙つた“2基の転炉を用いる製
鋼方法”の利点が充分に生かせない。 <問題点を解決する手段> そこで、本発明者等は、作業能率や環境保全の
点からぜひとも回避しなければならない前記“発
煙現象”を根本的に抑えて安定した製鋼作業性を
確保すべく様々な観点から研究を行つたところ、 (a) 脱燐銑出湯時に生じる取鍋からの発煙現象
は、先にも述べたように、出湯初期に取鍋内へ
漏れ出た酸化性スラグ中の酸素と溶銑中の炭素
との反応に起因するものではあるが、単にこの
反応のみではCOガスが発生するに過ぎないも
のであり、“発煙”として捕らえられる現象を
呈するのは塩基度が2程度であるスラグ特有の
パサパサしたスラグ性状が関与していて、この
スラグが発生COガス流に巻き上げられて飛散
するためである、 (b) しかしながら、第1図で示すように、脱燐炉
(転炉)7での脱燐精錬終了後の出湯初期の段
階(出湯開始から全出湯時間の50%以内程度の
段階)でシユート8等により取鍋内9へケイ
砂、生石灰及び少量のアルミニウム(バラAl)
を投入して所定塩基度の低融点スラグ10を形
成せしめてやると、溶銑中の炭素とスラグ中の
酸素との激しい反応が幾分抑制される上、塩基
度調整によつてスラグ性状が変えられているた
めにスラグ粒子の飛散が生じたりスラグ中の酸
化鉄が発生COガス流に巻き込まれたりするこ
とが無くなり、前記発煙現象が殆ど見られなく
なる、 と言う重要な知見を得るに至つたのである。な
お、第1図において、符号11は酸化性スラグ
を、12は溶銑をそれぞれ示している。 この発明は、上記知見に基づいてなされたもの
であり、 それぞれ転炉形式の脱燐炉と脱炭炉とを使用
し、脱燐炉での精錬により得られた脱燐溶銑を脱
炭炉に注銑して脱炭精錬するに当たり、脱燐炉か
ら溶銑を一旦取鍋に出湯する際、ケイ砂、生石灰
及びアルミニウムを取鍋内に投入し塩基度0.5〜
1.5の低融点スラグを形成させることにより、溶
銑出湯中の発煙を安定して防止し、出湯中の良好
な作業環境を確保し得るようにした点、 に特徴を有するものである。 ここで言う“転炉形式の炉”とは、傾倒により
出湯を行う溶銑処理炉一般を指すものであるが、
先に提案した特願昭61−132517号の方法のように
使用生石灰量少なく低燐鋼を能率生産するために
は“現在使われている形式の上下両吹き複合吹錬
転炉”が好ましい。 取鍋中に投入する副原料のうち、ケイ砂と生石
灰は溶融したスラグの融点を極力低下せしめて良
好な流動性を呈する“塩基度0.5〜1.5”のスラグ
を形成するためのものであり、一方、アルミニウ
ムはスラグ中の酸素を除去してCOガス発生反応
を緩和する役割を担つていて、何れが欠けても発
煙現象の安定防止は達成できない。なお、上記副
原料の配合割合はスラグ塩基度:0.5〜1.5を目標
とすれば良いが、例えば第1表に示すような配合
割合を推奨することができる。
<Industrial Application Field> This invention is used in a steelmaking process in which two converter-type furnaces are used to dephosphorize hot metal in one furnace and decarburize it in the other. The present invention relates to a method for preventing smoke generation when tapping hot water to ensure good workability and environmental protection. <Prior art and its problems> In recent years, quality requirements for various steel materials have become more sophisticated day by day, and with this, various innovations have been attempted in steel manufacturing methods and various new methods have been introduced. Under these circumstances, there have recently been great expectations for the development of a means to stably melt low-phosphorus steel at even lower costs, and much research is being carried out toward its realization. By the way, regarding the minimization of the total cost of steel manufacturing and the stable production of low phosphorous steel, the following preliminary dephosphorization method of hot metal has been proposed, and some of it has been put into practical use. In other words, preliminary dephosphorization is carried out by injecting quicklime-based dephosphorizing agent or soda ash into the hot metal in the torpedo car, and by injecting or blasting (spraying) quicklime-based flux into the hot metal in the ladle. A method of performing preliminary dephosphorization, a method of performing preliminary dephosphorization by blasting hot metal with quicklime-based flux in a blast furnace casthouse trough. However, although it is possible to achieve a relatively low P content level using the methods described in () and () above, dephosphorization is limited to "reactions that proceed during the floating process of the dephosphorizing agent (transitary reactor reaction)". However, the method described above has the problem that the utilization efficiency of dephosphorization flux is not necessarily good, and the longer the treatment time, the more heat is removed during treatment, which lowers the hot metal temperature. The hot metal temperature can be kept higher than the previous two methods, but since the dephosphorization treatment is performed on the hot metal immediately after being tapped from the blast furnace, the dephosphorization treatment temperature is too high and the P content level reached is the same. (mentioned above)
Both methods were unsatisfactory because they were worse than the methods (and). Furthermore, when using quicklime etc. as flux for hot metal dephosphorization, considering the amount of quicklime etc. used in the subsequent converter blowing, neither of the methods described above It was also pointed out that the required amount of slag-forming agent (the amount of quicklime, etc.) was not significantly reduced compared to the method of dephosphorizing using only a converter, omitting the process. Therefore, we have developed a method that can minimize the amount of slag-forming agent used, which greatly affects steelmaking costs, and that can efficiently produce high-quality steel without requiring any new equipment. The applicant strongly recognized the need for ``slag-metal countercurrent refining,'' in which slag and metal come into contact with each other in a countercurrent manner, and the amount of slag forming agent required throughout the entire steelmaking process is minimal. However, in reality, it is almost impossible to fully realize countercurrent refining, and the only steelmaking method that has the potential to reduce the amount of slag-forming agent with the least effort is currently A method in which the phosphorization process is divided into two stages and the slag generated in the lower stage is used as a dephosphorizing agent in the upper stage (i.e., a method in which converter slag is used as the main component of the flux for hot metal dephosphorization, for example, This is the basic idea of ``method of reusing converter slag as hot metal dephosphorization flux in outside-furnace refining,'' which the present applicant previously proposed in Japanese Patent Publication No. 55-30042. Based on the research results, he added, ``The steelmaking methods that have been proposed so far by reusing converter slag also involve out-of-furnace refining, making it extremely difficult to stably secure efficient working conditions.'' Moreover, the dephosphorization efficiency is not as high as expected, and mass production requires a special exhaust gas dust collector and dephosphorization slag removal equipment, making it a step forward as a means of mass production of high-quality steel. After paying attention to the problem in actual work, such as "It's something people hesitate to do," they proposed the following new steel manufacturing method (Patent application 1986-
No. 132517). That is, as shown in Figure 2, ``Two converter-type furnaces with both upper and lower blowing functions are used, and one of them is used as the dephosphorization furnace 1.
The other side is a decarburization furnace 2, and a refining agent mainly composed of converter slag 4 generated in the decarburization furnace 2 is added to the hot metal 3 injected into the dephosphorization furnace 1.
The temperature of the hot metal 3 in the dephosphorization furnace 1 is controlled by blowing oxygen gas upward from the lance 6 while stirring the bottom-blown gas.
This is a method in which hot metal is dephosphorized while being kept at 1400°C or lower, and then the obtained dephosphorized hot metal is decarburized in a decarburization furnace 2. According to this method, it has become possible to manufacture steel with a normal phosphorus level or low phosphorus steel with good workability and at low cost even with an extremely small amount of slag forming agent. The main advantages of the above method are specifically listed below. Because it is a "two-stage countercurrent refining" method that uses converter slag as the hot metal dephosphorization flux, the amount of quicklime used in the entire steelmaking process is significantly reduced compared to conventional methods.
It is possible to blow low phosphorus steel with an extremely small amount of quicklime. FeO in the converter slag is effectively used, improving the recovery rate of granulated iron and metal. Generally, when manganese ore or ferromanganese ore is used in a decarburization furnace, about half of these ores are Mn.
However, in the method of this invention, the slag is reused as hot metal dephosphorization flux, so the residual ore is effectively used, and the "[Mn] loss" in the hot metal is reduced. It is useful for “reducing ” or “increasing [Mn]”. Since the furnace used is a converter-type furnace, for example, even in the case of a dephosphorization furnace, only the dephosphorized pig iron can be tapped from the tapping port into the ladle, and then the slag in the furnace can be discharged into the slag ladle. Removal of slag is easier than in other dephosphorization methods. Since the furnace used is a converter-type furnace with both upper and lower blowing functions, the hot metal can be stirred strongly and the treatment can be carried out in a short time.Therefore, the amount of heat removed is small, compared to other dephosphorization treatment methods. It is extremely advantageous in terms of thermoeconomics. In particular, when melting converter slag is used, it becomes more thermoeconomically advantageous due to its sensible heat. Since the slag generated in the dephosphorization furnace has little free lime (free CaO is less than 1%), it can be effectively used as a roadbed material. Since two furnaces are used, there is no concern about poor dephosphorization due to P 2 O 5 adhering to the furnace body.
In other words, since high P 2 O 5 slag adheres to the dephosphorization furnace and only low P 2 O 5 slag adheres to the decarburization furnace, dephosphorization defects do not occur in the decarburization furnace. Moreover, when molten converter slag is used, the molten converter slag is charged into the dephosphorization furnace after the hot metal is charged, so there is no fear that a sudden explosive reaction will occur. Since dephosphorization is performed while stirring the bottom-blown gas,
Unlike the conventional hot metal dephosphorization method, there is no need to finely grind the dephosphorizing agent to near powder form, making it possible to reduce costs accordingly. If there is an idle converter, it can be used immediately as a dephosphorization furnace, and there is no need to prepare special equipment. In addition, for example, in the case of a factory operating 1/2 converter furnaces, one furnace can be used as a dephosphorization furnace, and this invention can be implemented without capital investment by operating 2/2 converters. It is possible. If it became necessary to build one of the bricks to extend the lifespan of the bricks, measures were taken to carry out conventional converter blowing using only one converter during this period to avoid leaving idle furnaces. Flexible refining is possible. As mentioned above, the "steel manufacturing method using two converter-type furnaces" proposed earlier by the applicant has many advantages, especially as a means of producing low phosphorus steel. However, as a result of further examination through many actual operations, the following new problems that needed improvement were recognized. That is, when steelmaking is carried out using a converter-type dephosphorization furnace and a decarburization furnace, the process of pouring dephosphorized pig iron into the decarburization furnace is, of course, essential.
For this purpose, when the furnace is tilted and the dephosphorized pig iron is tapped into the ladle, the slag layer floating on the hot metal as the furnace tilts first passes through the tap hole of the furnace, and then the hot metal layer. The iron reaches the tapping hole and tapping is performed. Therefore, it is impossible to prevent the slag from flowing out into the ladle from the tapping hole, although it is a small amount. However, when hot metal dephosphorization is carried out in a converter-type dephosphorization furnace, the oxygen in the slag, that is, (FeO), is about 3 to 10% (slag basicity is (about 2)
is highly controlled. Moreover, the tapped molten metal is dephosphorized hot metal with a high C content of around 4%. Therefore, when dephosphorizing pig iron is tapped, the slag that flows into the ladle is stirred by the hot metal flow and comes into contact with it, so oxygen in the slag (in the form of FeO) and carbon in the hot metal react violently, causing CO The problem is that the gas is blown up, and fine particles of slag, iron oxide, etc. are stirred up by this violent CO gas flow, creating a "smoking phenomenon" that has an extremely serious adverse effect on the working environment. Of course, it would be possible to avoid the negative effects of smoke generation by strengthening dust collection equipment as a countermeasure against smoke generation, but such measures would increase equipment costs and would require the use of two converters to reduce steelmaking costs. The advantages of the steelmaking method used cannot be fully utilized. <Means for Solving the Problems> Therefore, the present inventors have developed a method to ensure stable steelmaking workability by fundamentally suppressing the above-mentioned "smoke phenomenon," which must be avoided from the viewpoint of work efficiency and environmental protection. After conducting research from various viewpoints, we found that (a) The phenomenon of smoke emitted from the ladle during dephosphorization tapping is due to the oxidizing slag that leaked into the ladle at the early stage of tapping, as mentioned earlier. Although it is caused by the reaction between oxygen and carbon in hot metal, this reaction alone only generates CO gas, and the phenomenon that can be detected as "smoke" occurs only when the basicity is around 2. (b) However, as shown in Figure 1, the dry slag properties peculiar to slag are involved, and this slag is stirred up by the generated CO gas flow and scattered. At the early stage of tapping after the completion of dephosphorization and refining in the furnace) 7 (within 50% of the total tapping time from the start of tapping), silica sand, quicklime and a small amount of aluminum (in bulk) are poured into the ladle 9 using a chute 8, etc. Al)
When a low-melting point slag 10 with a predetermined basicity is formed by introducing slag, the violent reaction between the carbon in the hot metal and the oxygen in the slag is somewhat suppressed, and the slag properties change by adjusting the basicity. As a result, the slag particles do not scatter or the iron oxide in the slag is not caught up in the generated CO gas flow, and the above-mentioned smoke phenomenon is almost no longer observed. It is. In FIG. 1, reference numeral 11 indicates oxidizing slag, and reference numeral 12 indicates hot metal. This invention was made based on the above knowledge, and uses a converter-type dephosphorization furnace and a decarburization furnace, respectively, and transfers dephosphorized hot metal obtained by refining in the dephosphorization furnace to the decarburization furnace. During pouring and decarburizing refining, when hot metal is tapped from the dephosphorization furnace into a ladle, silica sand, quicklime, and aluminum are poured into the ladle to reduce the basicity to 0.5 or more.
By forming a slag with a low melting point of 1.5, it is possible to stably prevent smoke generation during hot metal tapping and ensure a good working environment during hot metal tapping. The term “converter type furnace” used here refers to a general hot metal processing furnace that taps hot metal by tilting.
In order to efficiently produce low-phosphorous steel using a small amount of quicklime, as in the method proposed earlier in Japanese Patent Application No. 61-132517, it is preferable to use a ``currently used upper and lower double blowing combined blowing converter''. Among the auxiliary materials put into the ladle, silica sand and quicklime are used to lower the melting point of the molten slag as much as possible to form a slag with a basicity of 0.5 to 1.5 that exhibits good fluidity. On the other hand, aluminum has the role of removing oxygen from the slag and mitigating the CO gas generation reaction, and if any of these is missing, it will not be possible to stabilize the smoke generation phenomenon. The mixing ratio of the above-mentioned auxiliary raw materials may be aimed at a slag basicity of 0.5 to 1.5, but the mixing ratio as shown in Table 1 can be recommended, for example.

【表】 また、取鍋内スラグの塩基度を特に0.5〜1.5に
調整する理由は、該塩基度が0.5未満の場合及び
1.5を越えた場合の何れであつても、スラグ性状
が融点の高いパサパサしたものとなり、溶銑に直
接接触している極く薄い層以外の部分での発生
COガス流による飛散が激しくなつて、容認でき
ない程の発煙現象を呈するようになるからであ
る。 次に、この発明を実施例により比較例と対比し
ながら具体的に説明する。 <実施例> まず、トーピード内で脱硫・脱珪処理した第2
表の上段に示される如き成分組成の溶銑250トン
を脱燐炉として使用する上下両吹き複合吹錬転炉
に注銑し、これに、同様形式の脱炭炉で発生した
転炉滓を冷却・凝固して30mm以下の粒径に破砕し
たもの25Kg/T、同様の粒径を持つ鉄鉱石10Kg/
T、並びに螢石4Kg/Tとを混合状態で添加して
10分間の脱燐処理を行つた。 なお、使用した脱燐炉並びに脱炭炉は、上述の
ように何れも炉底よりガス吹き込み攪拌が可能な
250トン上下両吹き複合吹錬転炉であり、第3表
に示すような操業条件が採用された。 このようにして得られた脱燐銑(成分組成は第
2表の中段に示す)を一旦取鍋中に出銑してから
脱炭炉に注銑し、通常の転炉操業で用いる生石灰
の10Kg/Tと螢石1Kg/Tとを造滓剤として主吹
錬を実施したが、上記取鍋中への出銑の際、第1
[Table] Also, the reason why the basicity of the slag in the ladle is adjusted to 0.5 to 1.5 is that if the basicity is less than 0.5 and
In any case where the value exceeds 1.5, the slag becomes dry and has a high melting point, and slag occurs in areas other than the extremely thin layer that is in direct contact with the hot metal.
This is because the scattering caused by the CO gas flow becomes more intense, resulting in an unacceptable smoke phenomenon. Next, the present invention will be specifically explained using examples and comparing with comparative examples. <Example> First, the second
250 tons of hot metal with the composition shown in the upper row of the table was poured into a double blowing combined blowing converter used as a dephosphorization furnace, and the converter slag generated in a similar type of decarburization furnace was cooled.・25Kg/T of solidified and crushed to a particle size of 30mm or less, 10Kg/T of iron ore with a similar particle size
T, and fluorite 4Kg/T are added in a mixed state.
Dephosphorization treatment was performed for 10 minutes. The dephosphorization furnace and decarburization furnace used are both capable of stirring by blowing gas from the bottom of the furnace, as mentioned above.
It is a 250-ton upper and lower double blowing combined blowing converter, and the operating conditions shown in Table 3 were adopted. The dephosphorized pig iron thus obtained (the composition is shown in the middle row of Table 2) is tapped into a ladle and then poured into a decarburizing furnace to produce quicklime used in normal converter operation. Main blowing was carried out using 10Kg/T and 1Kg/T of fluorite as slag forming agents, but when tapping into the ladle, the first
figure

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 に示した如く、出銑初期段階(出銑開始から全出
銑時間の50%までの間)に第4表で示した配合割
合の副原料をシユートから投入し、取鍋中スラム
の塩基度を同じく第4表に示す如くに調整しなが
ら出銑を実施した。 この結果、第4表に併せて示したように、本発
明で規定した条件通りに出銑を実施した場合(試
験番号3乃至5)には取鍋からの発煙現象は殆ど
見られず良好な作業を行えたが、副原料の投入を
行わなかつたり(試験番号1)、副原料投入によ
るスラグ塩基度調整が本発明で規定する条件を満
足しなかつたり(試験番号2及び6)、或いは副
原料としてのアルミニウムの投入がなされなかつ
た場合(試験番号7)には、激しい発煙現象のた
め作業の続行を実際上中断せざるを得ないか、作
業環境悪化のために著しい作業性の劣化を生じる
ことが確認された。 脱炭炉における主吹錬では、終点温度(吹錬終
了温度)が1675℃となるように冷却材として鉄鉱
石を適時添加した。 このとき発生した転炉滓は25Kg/Tであり、こ
れを鉄鉱石及び螢石と共に再び次のチヤージの脱
燐剤原料として脱燐炉に添加して脱燐を行う一連
の操作を繰り返した。 この結果、全製鋼工程での使用生石灰量が通常
の転炉一回吹錬のときの約1/4と言う極めて少な
い値で、第2表の下段に示すような、鋼中P量:
0.013重量%の溶鋼を得ることができた。 <効果の総括> 以上に説明した如く、この発明によれば、品質
の良好な鋼をコスト安く製造する場合に極めて有
利な“転炉形式の脱燐炉と脱炭炉の2基の炉を使
用する製鋼手段”を実施する場合等に問題となる
ところの、“転炉からの溶銑出銑時の取鍋内発煙
現象”を格別な設備を要することなく安定確実に
抑えることができ、工業的に何ら支障のない出銑
作業性の確保が十分に可能となるなど、産業上極
めて有用な効果がもたらされるのである。
[Table] As shown in Table 4, during the initial stage of tapping (from the start of tapping to 50% of the total tapping time), the auxiliary materials in the proportions shown in Table 4 are introduced from the chute, and the slum in the ladle is Tapping was carried out while adjusting the basicity of the iron as shown in Table 4. As a result, as shown in Table 4, when tapping was carried out according to the conditions stipulated in the present invention (test numbers 3 to 5), there was almost no smoke emission from the ladle and good results were obtained. The work could be carried out, but the auxiliary raw material was not added (test number 1), the slag basicity adjustment by adding the auxiliary material did not satisfy the conditions specified in the present invention (test numbers 2 and 6), or If aluminum was not added as a raw material (Test No. 7), the continuation of the work would have to be stopped due to severe smoke generation, or the workability would deteriorate significantly due to the deterioration of the working environment. It has been confirmed that this occurs. During the main blowing in the decarburization furnace, iron ore was added as a coolant at appropriate times so that the end point temperature (blowing end temperature) was 1675°C. The converter slag generated at this time weighed 25 kg/T, and was added to the dephosphorization furnace together with iron ore and fluorite as a dephosphorizing agent raw material for the next charge, and a series of dephosphorization operations were repeated. As a result, the amount of quicklime used in the entire steelmaking process is extremely small, about 1/4 of that in normal converter single blowing, and the amount of P in the steel is as shown in the lower part of Table 2:
It was possible to obtain 0.013% by weight molten steel. <Summary of Effects> As explained above, according to the present invention, two furnaces, a converter-type dephosphorization furnace and a decarburization furnace, are extremely advantageous when producing high-quality steel at low cost. It is possible to stably and reliably suppress the "smoking phenomenon in the ladle when hot metal is tapped from the converter", which is a problem when implementing the "steelmaking method used", without requiring special equipment, and is suitable for industrial use. This brings about extremely useful effects industrially, such as making it possible to fully ensure the efficiency of tapping without any problems.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は、この発明に係る脱燐精錬後の出湯方
法例を示した概略説明図、第2図は、2基の転炉
を用いた製鋼法の概要を示した概略説明図であ
る。 図面において、1,7……脱燐炉、2……脱炭
炉、3,12……溶銑、4……転炉滓、4′,1
1……転炉滓を主成分とする脱燐スラグ(酸化性
スラグ)、5……攪拌ガス吹き込みノズル、6…
…ランス、8……シユート、9……取鍋、10…
…低融点スラグ。
FIG. 1 is a schematic explanatory diagram showing an example of the tapping method after dephosphorization and refining according to the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a schematic explanatory diagram showing an outline of the steel manufacturing method using two converters. In the drawings, 1, 7...Dephosphorization furnace, 2...Decarburization furnace, 3, 12...Hot metal, 4...Converter slag, 4', 1
1... Dephosphorization slag (oxidizing slag) mainly composed of converter slag, 5... Stirring gas blowing nozzle, 6...
... Lance, 8... Shoot, 9... Ladle, 10...
...Low melting point slag.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 それぞれ転炉形式の脱燐炉と脱炭炉とを使用
し、脱燐炉での精錬により得られた脱燐溶銑を脱
炭炉に注銑して脱炭精錬するに当たり、脱燐炉か
ら溶銑を一旦取鍋に出湯する際、ケイ砂、生石灰
及びアルミニウムを取鍋内に投入し塩基度0.5〜
1.5の低融点スラグを形成させることを特徴とす
る、溶銑出湯中の発煙防止方法。
1. When dephosphorizing hot metal obtained by refining in the dephosphorizing furnace is poured into the decarburizing furnace and decarburizing by using a converter-type dephosphorizing furnace and a decarburizing furnace, When pouring hot metal into a ladle, silica sand, quicklime, and aluminum are added into the ladle and the basicity is 0.5~
A method for preventing smoke generation during tapping of hot metal, characterized by forming a low melting point slag of 1.5.
JP2682587A 1987-02-07 1987-02-07 Method for preventing smoke emission during taping of molten iron Granted JPS63195214A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2682587A JPS63195214A (en) 1987-02-07 1987-02-07 Method for preventing smoke emission during taping of molten iron

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2682587A JPS63195214A (en) 1987-02-07 1987-02-07 Method for preventing smoke emission during taping of molten iron

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63195214A JPS63195214A (en) 1988-08-12
JPH0431003B2 true JPH0431003B2 (en) 1992-05-25

Family

ID=12204049

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2682587A Granted JPS63195214A (en) 1987-02-07 1987-02-07 Method for preventing smoke emission during taping of molten iron

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS63195214A (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2820437B1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2004-04-23 Nippon Steel Corp METHOD FOR DEPHOSPHORATING LIQUID IRON

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS63195214A (en) 1988-08-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN113493868A (en) High scrap ratio converter smelting method based on molten reduced molten iron
JP6421634B2 (en) Manufacturing method of molten steel
JP3557910B2 (en) Hot metal dephosphorization method and low sulfur and low phosphorus steel smelting method
JPH0437132B2 (en)
JP2012126946A (en) Method for dephosphorizing molten iron
JP3885499B2 (en) Converter steelmaking method
JP3711835B2 (en) Sintering agent for hot metal dephosphorization and hot metal dephosphorization method
JP2003239009A (en) Hot metal dephosphorization refining method
JP2004190114A (en) Hot metal dephosphorization method
JPH01316409A (en) Method for dephosphorizing molten iron accompanied with scrap melting
JP3333339B2 (en) Converter steelmaking method for recycling decarburized slag
JPH0431003B2 (en)
JPS63195211A (en) Production of low phosphorus and low carbon steel with little mn loss
WO2003029498A1 (en) Method for pretreatment of molten iron and method for refining
JPH01147011A (en) Steelmaking method
JP2009052059A (en) Hot phosphorus dephosphorization method
JP3339982B2 (en) Converter steelmaking method
JPS62290815A (en) Steel making method
JPH01215917A (en) Method for melting stainless steel
JPS6393813A (en) Steel making method
JPH03122210A (en) Two step counterflow refined steelmaking method using duplex converters
JP2587286B2 (en) Steelmaking method
JP2002275520A (en) Refining method of high carbon molten steel
JPH01312020A (en) Method for dephosphorizing molten iron by heating
JPH01147012A (en) Steelmaking method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term