JPH04334547A - Ozone decomposing catalyst - Google Patents

Ozone decomposing catalyst

Info

Publication number
JPH04334547A
JPH04334547A JP3198971A JP19897191A JPH04334547A JP H04334547 A JPH04334547 A JP H04334547A JP 3198971 A JP3198971 A JP 3198971A JP 19897191 A JP19897191 A JP 19897191A JP H04334547 A JPH04334547 A JP H04334547A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
catalyst
mno2
ozone
ozone decomposing
thickness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP3198971A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masafumi Yoshimoto
吉本 雅文
Tadao Nakatsuji
忠夫 仲辻
Kazuhiko Nagano
永野 一彦
Kimihiko Yoshida
公彦 吉田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sakai Chemical Industry Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sakai Chemical Industry Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sakai Chemical Industry Co Ltd filed Critical Sakai Chemical Industry Co Ltd
Priority to JP3198971A priority Critical patent/JPH04334547A/en
Priority to US07/747,062 priority patent/US5212140A/en
Priority to EP91113995A priority patent/EP0501003B1/en
Priority to DE69118161T priority patent/DE69118161T2/en
Publication of JPH04334547A publication Critical patent/JPH04334547A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters

Landscapes

  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To provide an ozone decomposing catalyst excellent not only in the productivity of a low pitch honeycomb but also in ozone decomposing capacity. CONSTITUTION:An ozone decomposing catalyst is constituted by supporting an active substance having ozone decomposing capacity on an MnO2-containing carrier in the thickness of 5-100mum and shows excellent ozone decomposing effect.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、気体等の中に含まれる
、オゾンを分解除去するための触媒に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a catalyst for decomposing and removing ozone contained in gases.

【従来の技術】従来、気体中に含まれる有害成分である
オゾンを除去する方法として、活性炭、ゼオライト等の
多孔質物質を用いる吸着法、あるいは、MnO2などの
触媒を用いることによる酸化分解法等の方法が行われて
きた。
[Prior Art] Conventionally, methods for removing ozone, a harmful component contained in gases, include adsorption methods using porous materials such as activated carbon and zeolite, and oxidative decomposition methods using catalysts such as MnO2. method has been used.

【発明が解決しようとする問題点】しかしながら、上記
従来のオゾンの除去方法はいずれも、充分に満足のいく
方法であるとは言い難い。すなわち、吸着法には、吸着
剤が吸着能力を発揮する期間が有限であるため、再生等
することを要し、除去装置のメンテナンスに多大の労力
及び費用が必要となるという問題がある。又、触媒を用
いるオゾンの酸化分解法には、上記のような問題は無い
ものの、現状では触媒性能上充分に満足のいくものであ
るとは言い難く、また初期性能は良くても、反応中に経
時的に劣化するという問題があった。本発明は、従来の
オゾン除去方法が有していたこれらの問題を解決するた
めになされたものであって、その目的とするところは、
従来方法に比べてオゾンの除去能力に優れると同時に、
長期間の使用が可能な耐久性に優れたオゾン分解触媒を
提供することにある。また、本発明は既に本発明者らが
出願している特願平2−24843にかかる発明を改良
したものである。すなわち本発明にかかる反応は反応律
速が固体内拡散であるため反応が触媒表面部においての
み進行するため触媒構造として触媒成分を触媒表面近傍
にのみ担持するコート型が最も好ましいことを本発明者
らが既に提案している。しかしながらこれらの方法も例
えばハニカム構造体のセル数/inch2が大きくなる
にしたがってその製造方法が難しくなるという問題点を
有していた。本発明は、これらの問題点をも解決するこ
とを可能にしたもので、すなわちコート厚みを低減する
ことが可能となったため成形触媒とりわけ低ピッチハニ
カムの生産性に優れると同時にオゾン分解能力、及び、
長期耐久性に優れたオゾン分解触媒を提供することにあ
る。
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention] However, none of the above conventional ozone removal methods can be said to be fully satisfactory. That is, the adsorption method has a problem in that since the period during which the adsorbent exhibits its adsorption ability is limited, it requires regeneration, etc., and a great deal of labor and cost is required for maintenance of the removal device. In addition, although the ozone oxidation decomposition method using a catalyst does not have the above-mentioned problems, it is difficult to say that the catalyst performance is fully satisfactory at present, and even if the initial performance is good, there are problems during the reaction. There was a problem that it deteriorated over time. The present invention was made to solve these problems that conventional ozone removal methods had, and its purpose is to:
At the same time, it has superior ozone removal ability compared to conventional methods.
The purpose of the present invention is to provide an ozone decomposition catalyst that can be used for a long period of time and has excellent durability. Furthermore, the present invention is an improvement on the invention disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 2-24843 filed by the present inventors. In other words, in the reaction according to the present invention, the reaction rate is determined by diffusion within the solid, and the reaction proceeds only on the surface of the catalyst. has already been proposed. However, these methods also have the problem that, for example, as the number of cells/inch2 of the honeycomb structure increases, the manufacturing method thereof becomes more difficult. The present invention has made it possible to solve these problems. In other words, since it has become possible to reduce the coating thickness, it has excellent productivity of shaped catalysts, especially low pitch honeycombs, and at the same time has improved ozone decomposition ability and ,
The objective is to provide an ozone decomposition catalyst with excellent long-term durability.

【問題を解決するための手段】上記目的を達成するため
の本発明にかかるオゾン分解用触媒は、MnO2を含有
する担体をBaseとして、オゾン分解能を有する活性
種を担持させてなることを特徴としている。オゾン分解
能を有する触媒活性種として既に本発明者らが提案して
いるようなTi、Cu、Mn、Ni、Fe、Ag、Au
、Mo、Zr、Sn、Nb、Wなどの種々の金属、及び
金属酸化物もしくは硫酸塩の少なくとも1種以上からな
るもの、あるいはこれらに活性炭、酸性粘土を含有させ
たものなどを挙げることができる。こうした触媒として
は、例えば担持されるべき金属酸化物を用いて表せば、
MnO2、NiO、CuO、Fe2O3、を主成分とす
るもの及びMnO2−TiO2、MnO2−CuO、M
nO2−Fe2O3、MnO2−Ag2O、NiO−C
o3O4、NiO−TiO2、NiO−MnO2、Ni
O−Ag2O、NiO−MoO3、NiO−WO3、N
iO−SnO2等を主成分とするもの及び、MnO2−
Ag2O−TiO2、MnO2−CuO−Ag2O、N
iO−MnO2−Ag2O、NiO−MnO2−TiO
2等を主成分とするものが例示される。本発明方法にお
いて用いられる触媒の形状は特に限定されず、例えばハ
ニカム状、ペレット状、円柱状、板状、パイプ状等、種
々の形状のものを用いることができる。このうちMnO
2を含有する担体は、主に、混練法によって製造するこ
とができる。担体の製造においては、賦形性を与えるた
めに成形助剤を添加したり、機械強度等を向上させるた
めに無機繊維等の補強剤、有機バインダー等を適宜添加
したりしてもよい。これらの担体中に含まれるMnO2
は、10wt%以上が好ましく、20wt%以上がより
好ましい。10wt%以下とすると担体のオゾン分解能
が著しく低下するため、高分解能を得るためにはコート
厚みを厚くする必要がある。これらの担体の上に担持さ
れる触媒活性種は、主にウォシュコート法などによって
製造することが出来る。これらのコート厚みは、5〜1
00μが好ましく、10〜50μがより好ましい。又、
5μ以下とすると分解活性が低下し100μ以上とする
と分解活性の向上がなく圧損のみが上昇する。オゾン分
解の際の反応温度は、0〜40℃が好ましく、10〜3
0℃がより好ましい。0℃未満の場合、反応速度が遅く
なるからであり、40℃を越えた場合、新たに昇温のた
めの熱エネルギーを必要とし不経済であるからである。 又、触媒と反応ガスとの接触は、5〜70の面積速度(
AV;area  velocity)で行うことが好
ましい。これは、面積速度が5未満であると触媒が多く
必要になるからであり、面積速度が50を超えると効率
が低く所定の分解率が得られないからである。ここで、
面積速度とは、空間速度(1/Hr)を単位容積当たり
のガス接触面積(m2/m3)で除去した値である。
[Means for Solving the Problems] The ozone decomposition catalyst according to the present invention for achieving the above object is characterized in that an active species having an ozone decomposition ability is supported on a carrier containing MnO2 as a base. There is. Ti, Cu, Mn, Ni, Fe, Ag, Au, which the present inventors have already proposed as catalytic active species having ozone decomposition ability.
, various metals such as Mo, Zr, Sn, Nb, and W, and at least one of metal oxides or sulfates, or those containing activated carbon or acidic clay. . As such a catalyst, for example, if it is expressed using a metal oxide to be supported,
Those whose main components are MnO2, NiO, CuO, Fe2O3, and MnO2-TiO2, MnO2-CuO, M
nO2-Fe2O3, MnO2-Ag2O, NiO-C
o3O4, NiO-TiO2, NiO-MnO2, Ni
O-Ag2O, NiO-MoO3, NiO-WO3, N
Those whose main component is iO-SnO2 etc., and MnO2-
Ag2O-TiO2, MnO2-CuO-Ag2O, N
iO-MnO2-Ag2O, NiO-MnO2-TiO
An example is one in which the main component is 2 or the like. The shape of the catalyst used in the method of the present invention is not particularly limited, and various shapes can be used, such as a honeycomb shape, a pellet shape, a columnar shape, a plate shape, a pipe shape, and the like. Of these, MnO
A carrier containing 2 can be mainly produced by a kneading method. In producing the carrier, a molding aid may be added to impart shapeability, and reinforcing agents such as inorganic fibers, organic binders, etc. may be appropriately added to improve mechanical strength. MnO2 contained in these carriers
is preferably 10 wt% or more, more preferably 20 wt% or more. If it is less than 10 wt%, the ozone decomposition ability of the carrier will be significantly reduced, so in order to obtain high resolution, it is necessary to increase the coating thickness. The catalytically active species supported on these carriers can be produced mainly by a wash coating method or the like. The thickness of these coats is 5 to 1
00μ is preferable, and 10-50μ is more preferable. or,
When it is less than 5μ, the decomposition activity decreases, and when it is more than 100μ, there is no improvement in the decomposition activity and only the pressure drop increases. The reaction temperature during ozonolysis is preferably 0 to 40°C, and 10 to 3°C.
0°C is more preferred. This is because if the temperature is less than 0°C, the reaction rate will be slow, and if it exceeds 40°C, additional thermal energy will be required to raise the temperature, which is uneconomical. In addition, the contact between the catalyst and the reaction gas is carried out at an areal velocity of 5 to 70 (
It is preferable to carry out at AV (area velocity). This is because if the areal velocity is less than 5, a large amount of catalyst is required, and if the areal velocity is more than 50, the efficiency is low and a predetermined decomposition rate cannot be obtained. here,
The area velocity is the value obtained by removing the space velocity (1/Hr) by the gas contact area per unit volume (m2/m3).

【実施例】以下、本発明を実施例に基づいて詳細に説明
する。但し本発明は、下記の実施例に限定されるもので
はない。 A.触媒の調整 実施例1 木節粘土を100℃にて18時間乾燥後、スクリーンが
0.5mmφであるサンプルミルにて粉砕した。これら
の粉砕物を8kg、比表面積が67m2/gであるMn
O2を2kg、メチルセルロース系バインダー(ユケン
工業  YB−32)0.8kgと水を加え、混合後ニ
ーダーで充分に混練を行った。これらの坏土を、ハニカ
ム押出用ダイスを装着したオーガスクリュー式押出機に
投入し、ハニカム状物を常温にて通風乾燥乾燥後、N2
気流中で5℃/時間の昇温速度で500℃まで昇温し、
昇温後3時間キープした後、10℃/時間の降温速度で
冷却し、開口率64%、ピッチ1.0mmのハニカム状
担体を得た。次に比表面積が67m2/gであるMnO
2、1kgに500mlの水と少量のバインダーを加え
、更にガラスビーズ250gを加えて、30分間攪拌混
合した後、ビーズを分離し、スラリーを得た。このスラ
リーに水300mlを加えて希釈した後、上述したハニ
カム状担体を適切な大きさに切り出したものを浸漬し、
過剰のスラリーを除去して乾燥し、MnO2を平均厚み
38μ担持した触媒を得た。なお厚みの算定はEPMA
による線分折によりn数を10としてその平均値を求め
ることにより行った。以下同様の方法により厚を求めた
。 実施例2 実施例1において、MnO2、1kgのうち200gを
TiO2にかえ、さらに希釈水を500mlとすること
以外は実施例1と同様にして、MnO2−TiO2(重
量比80:20)をこの時コート回数を調節し、担持し
た触媒を得た。コート厚みを6μ、10μ、15μ、3
0μ、42μに変えた5種類の触媒を得た。 実施例3 実施例1において、MnO2、1kgのうち100gを
Ag2Oにかえる以外は実施例1と同様にして、MnO
2−Ag2O(重量比90:10)を平均厚み47μで
担持した触媒を得た。 実施例4 実施例1の方法において、木節粘土粉砕物を5kg、M
nO2を5kg、メチルセルロース系バインダー(ユケ
ン工業  YB−32)を1kgとすること以外実施例
1にしたがいハニカム状担体を得た。この担体を実施例
2で用いたものと同様のスラリーで処理しコート回数を
調節しコート厚みが5μ、11μ、20μ、33μ、4
5μの5種類の触媒を得た。 実施例5 実施例1において、MnO2、1kgのうち400gを
比表面積が38m2/gであるFe2O3、100gを
Ag2Oにかえる以外は実施例1と同様にして、MnO
2−Fe2O3−Ag2O(重量比50:40:10)
を平均厚み51μで担持した触媒を得た。 実施例6 実施例1において、MnO2、1kgのうち200gを
活性炭(武田薬品製白鷺A)100gをTiO2にかえ
る以外は実施例1と同様にして、MnO2−活性炭−T
iO2(重量比70:20:10)を平均厚み38μで
担持した触媒を得た。 実施例7 実施例1において、MnO2にかえて比表面積が55m
2/g、CuOを用いること以外は実施例1と同様にし
て、CuOを平均厚み45μで担持した触媒を得た。 比較例1 実施例1において、担体を押出し成形する際に、木節粘
土を20kgとし、活性炭を加えないこと以外は実施例
1と同様にしてMnO2を平均厚み50μ担持した触媒
を得た。 実施例8 実施例4において、担体を押出し成形する際に、木節粘
土を18kgとし、活性炭を2kgとすること以外は実
施例4と同様にしてMnO2を平均厚み57μ担持した
触媒を得た。 参考例 比表面積48m2/gのMnO230gと、四塩化チタ
ンとシリンゾルとの混合物(TiO2:SiO2が1:
1)70gとを攪拌混合しつつ、アンモニアガスを吹き
込んで中和反応を行い、スラリー状の沈澱物を生成させ
た。得られた沈澱物を充分に水洗した後、温度500℃
で3時間焼成、粉砕して比表面積162m2/gの三元
触媒MnO2−TiO2−SiO2(重量比35:30
:35)パウダーを得た。以下、実施例1と同様にして
SiO2−MnO2−TiO2(重量比35:30:3
5)を担持率99%で担持した三元触媒を得た。 B.触媒活性試験 上記実施例1〜8及び比較例1、及び参考例で得た触媒
について、第1図にそのフローシートを示すような試験
装置を用いて、下記反応条件で触媒活性試験を行い、初
期、10時間経過後、及び100時間経過後のオゾン分
解率を求めた。図において、(1)はオゾン発生器であ
り、これに導入されたエアーより適切な濃度のオゾンを
発生させ、このオゾン含有エアーを触媒層(2)に導く
。オゾン分解率(%)は、(3)のオゾン分析計にて測
定される触媒層の入口及び出口の値により次式で求めら
れる。 (反応条件) 空間速度:20,000/Hr 入口オゾン濃度:10ppm 反応温度:20℃ 上記試験結果を表1に示す。 上記表より明らかなように、実施例1〜8で得たいずれ
の触媒も、比較例1及び参考例で得た触媒に比べて高い
オゾン分解率(%)を有していると同時に長時間にわた
って殆ど性能の劣化を示さず、優れた耐久性を有してい
る。
EXAMPLES The present invention will be explained in detail below based on examples. However, the present invention is not limited to the following examples. A. Catalyst Preparation Example 1 Kibushi clay was dried at 100° C. for 18 hours and then ground in a sample mill with a screen of 0.5 mmφ. 8 kg of these pulverized materials, Mn with a specific surface area of 67 m2/g
2 kg of O2, 0.8 kg of methyl cellulose binder (Yuken Kogyo YB-32) and water were added, and after mixing, the mixture was thoroughly kneaded using a kneader. These clays were put into an auger screw extruder equipped with a die for honeycomb extrusion, and the honeycomb-like material was dried with ventilation at room temperature, and then heated with N2
Raise the temperature to 500°C at a heating rate of 5°C/hour in an air flow,
After the temperature was raised and maintained for 3 hours, it was cooled at a cooling rate of 10° C./hour to obtain a honeycomb-shaped carrier with an aperture ratio of 64% and a pitch of 1.0 mm. Next, MnO with a specific surface area of 67 m2/g
2. 500 ml of water and a small amount of binder were added to 1 kg, and 250 g of glass beads were added, and after stirring and mixing for 30 minutes, the beads were separated to obtain a slurry. After diluting this slurry by adding 300 ml of water, the above-mentioned honeycomb-shaped carrier cut into an appropriate size was immersed.
Excess slurry was removed and dried to obtain a catalyst supporting MnO2 with an average thickness of 38μ. The thickness is calculated using EPMA.
The average value was determined by line analysis with n number of 10. The thickness was determined using the same method below. Example 2 In the same manner as in Example 1, except that 200 g of 1 kg of MnO2 was changed to TiO2 and the dilution water was further changed to 500 ml, MnO2-TiO2 (weight ratio 80:20) was used. A supported catalyst was obtained by adjusting the number of coats. Coat thickness: 6μ, 10μ, 15μ, 3
Five types of catalysts were obtained with different sizes of 0μ and 42μ. Example 3 In the same manner as in Example 1 except that 100 g of 1 kg of MnO2 was changed to Ag2O, MnO
A catalyst was obtained in which 2-Ag2O (weight ratio 90:10) was supported with an average thickness of 47μ. Example 4 In the method of Example 1, 5 kg of pulverized Kibushi clay, M
A honeycomb-shaped carrier was obtained in accordance with Example 1 except that nO2 was 5 kg and methyl cellulose binder (Yuken Kogyo YB-32) was 1 kg. This carrier was treated with the same slurry as that used in Example 2, and the number of coats was adjusted to give a coating thickness of 5μ, 11μ, 20μ, 33μ, and 4μ.
Five types of catalysts of 5μ were obtained. Example 5 In the same manner as in Example 1, except that 400 g of 1 kg of MnO2 was changed to Fe2O3 with a specific surface area of 38 m2/g, and 100 g was changed to Ag2O, MnO
2-Fe2O3-Ag2O (weight ratio 50:40:10)
A catalyst having an average thickness of 51 μm was obtained. Example 6 In Example 1, MnO2-activated carbon-T was prepared in the same manner as in Example 1 except that 200g of 1kg of MnO2 and 100g of activated carbon (Shirasagi A manufactured by Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) was replaced with TiO2.
A catalyst was obtained in which iO2 (weight ratio 70:20:10) was supported with an average thickness of 38μ. Example 7 In Example 1, instead of MnO2, the specific surface area was 55 m
A catalyst supporting CuO with an average thickness of 45 μm was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that CuO was used. Comparative Example 1 A catalyst in which MnO2 was supported with an average thickness of 50 μm was obtained in the same manner as in Example 1 except that 20 kg of Kibushi clay was used and activated carbon was not added when extruding the carrier. Example 8 A catalyst in which MnO2 was supported to an average thickness of 57 μm was obtained in the same manner as in Example 4, except that when extruding the carrier, Kibushi clay was used in an amount of 18 kg, and activated carbon was added in an amount of 2 kg. Reference example: A mixture of 30 g of MnO2 with a specific surface area of 48 m2/g, titanium tetrachloride, and syrinsol (TiO2:SiO2: 1:
1) While stirring and mixing 70 g, ammonia gas was blown in to perform a neutralization reaction, and a slurry-like precipitate was generated. After thoroughly washing the obtained precipitate with water, the temperature was 500°C.
The three-way catalyst MnO2-TiO2-SiO2 (weight ratio 35:30
:35) Powder was obtained. Hereinafter, in the same manner as in Example 1, SiO2-MnO2-TiO2 (weight ratio 35:30:3
A three-way catalyst was obtained in which 5) was supported at a loading rate of 99%. B. Catalytic activity test The catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 8, Comparative Example 1, and Reference Example were subjected to a catalytic activity test under the following reaction conditions using a testing apparatus whose flow sheet is shown in Figure 1. The ozone decomposition rate at the initial stage, after 10 hours, and after 100 hours was determined. In the figure, (1) is an ozone generator, which generates ozone at an appropriate concentration from the air introduced into it, and guides this ozone-containing air to the catalyst layer (2). The ozone decomposition rate (%) is determined by the following formula from the values at the inlet and outlet of the catalyst layer measured by the ozone analyzer in (3). (Reaction conditions) Space velocity: 20,000/Hr Inlet ozone concentration: 10 ppm Reaction temperature: 20° C. The above test results are shown in Table 1. As is clear from the above table, all the catalysts obtained in Examples 1 to 8 have a higher ozone decomposition rate (%) than the catalysts obtained in Comparative Example 1 and Reference Example, and at the same time It shows almost no deterioration in performance over time and has excellent durability.

【発明の効果】本発明に係るオゾン分解触媒は、オゾン
を効率良く除去し、かつ長時間にわたってその性能の劣
化を示さない。
Effects of the Invention The ozone decomposition catalyst according to the present invention efficiently removes ozone and does not show any deterioration in its performance over a long period of time.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図は触媒活性試験のフローシートである。 (1)・・オゾン発生器 (2)・・触媒層 (3)・・オゾン分析計 FIG. 1 is a flow sheet of the catalyst activity test. (1)...Ozone generator (2)...Catalyst layer (3)...Ozone analyzer

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] MnO2を含有する担体にオゾン分解能を有する活性物
質が5〜100μの厚みで担持されていることを特徴と
するオゾン分解用触媒。
An ozone decomposition catalyst characterized in that an active substance having ozone decomposition ability is supported on a carrier containing MnO2 to a thickness of 5 to 100 μm.
JP3198971A 1991-02-28 1991-05-07 Ozone decomposing catalyst Pending JPH04334547A (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3198971A JPH04334547A (en) 1991-05-07 1991-05-07 Ozone decomposing catalyst
US07/747,062 US5212140A (en) 1991-02-28 1991-08-19 Catalyst for decomposing ozone
EP91113995A EP0501003B1 (en) 1991-02-28 1991-08-21 Catalyst and method for decomposing ozone by the use thereof
DE69118161T DE69118161T2 (en) 1991-02-28 1991-08-21 Catalyst and method for decomposing ozone through its use

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3198971A JPH04334547A (en) 1991-05-07 1991-05-07 Ozone decomposing catalyst

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04334547A true JPH04334547A (en) 1992-11-20

Family

ID=16399975

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP3198971A Pending JPH04334547A (en) 1991-02-28 1991-05-07 Ozone decomposing catalyst

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH04334547A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5212140A (en) Catalyst for decomposing ozone
JP4317345B2 (en) Low concentration CO-containing exhaust gas treatment method
JP3326836B2 (en) Catalyst body and method for producing catalyst body
US5002920A (en) Catalyst for ozone decomposition
DE3149960A1 (en) COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATING EXHAUST GAS
KR100518957B1 (en) Process for purification of exhaust gases
CN121911232A (en) Reactor for reducing nitrogen oxides
JPH0474514A (en) Ozone decomposing method
KR20180081090A (en) Polymer film production process purification catalyst and polymer film production process
JP3604740B2 (en) Ozone decomposition catalyst and ozone decomposition method
JPH0523590A (en) Catalyst for decomposing ozone
CN113680383B (en) A composite material for purifying aldehydes and benzene series in air, and its preparation method and application
JP2001286734A (en) Method for decomposing chlorinated organic compounds and method for treating combustion exhaust gas
JPS60212234A (en) Honeycomb shaped deodorizing catalyst
JPS60220148A (en) Honeycomb shaped deodorizing catalyst
JPH04108542A (en) Ozone decomposing catalyst
JP7165345B2 (en) Method for decomposing amine-based compound and catalyst for decomposing amine-based compound
JPH038447A (en) Catalyst for decomposition of ozone
JPH03229645A (en) Ozone decomposing catalyst
JPH05329365A (en) Ozone decomposition catalyst
JP2982623B2 (en) Detoxification method of ammonia-containing exhaust gas
JPH04222631A (en) Ozone decomposing catalyst
JPH02149343A (en) Ozone decomposition catalyst
JP4348912B2 (en) Catalyst for decomposing chlorinated organic compound and method for decomposing chlorinated organic compound
JP3509286B2 (en) Decomposition method of chlorinated organic compounds