JPH0437136B2 - - Google Patents
Info
- Publication number
- JPH0437136B2 JPH0437136B2 JP14481588A JP14481588A JPH0437136B2 JP H0437136 B2 JPH0437136 B2 JP H0437136B2 JP 14481588 A JP14481588 A JP 14481588A JP 14481588 A JP14481588 A JP 14481588A JP H0437136 B2 JPH0437136 B2 JP H0437136B2
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- hot metal
- scrap
- blowing
- dephosphorization
- added
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Landscapes
- Refinement Of Pig-Iron, Manufacture Of Cast Iron, And Steel Manufacture Other Than In Revolving Furnaces (AREA)
- Carbon Steel Or Casting Steel Manufacturing (AREA)
Description
〈産業上の利用分野〉
この発明は、溶銑脱燐(以降、脱Pと記す)処
理時に、多量の製鋼補助原料スクラツプを製品組
成等に悪影響を及ぼすことなく溶解することが可
能な溶銑脱P方法に関するものである。
〈従来の技術〉
近年、各種鋼材に対する品質要求が一段と高ま
つてきたことに呼応し、低P鋼の安価溶製や製鋼
トータルシステムとしてのコスト合理化(造滓剤
トータル使用量の節減、転炉でのMn鉱石の溶融
還元によるフエロマンガンの節減)を目的として
製鋼前の溶銑を脱Pする“溶銑脱P処理”の採用
が積極的になされるようになつてきた。
なお、これまでに提案された溶銑脱P処理手段
の代表的なものとして、次のような方法が挙げら
れる。
(A) トーピード内の溶銑に生石灰系のフラツクス
又はソーダ灰をインジエクシヨンする方法。
(B) 取鍋内の溶銑に生石灰系のフラツクスをイン
ジエクシヨンしたりブラステイング(吹き付
け)したりする方法。
(C) 高炉鋳床樋中の溶銑に生石灰系のフラツクス
をブラステイングする方法。
(D) 上下両吹き転炉を使用し、生石灰系フラツク
スを用いて吹錬する方法〔鉄と鋼、(1987)、
S276頁〕。
(E) 上下両吹き転炉を使用し、転炉滓(脱C炉で
生じたもの)を脱P剤の主成分として用いて吹
錬する方法〔特願昭61−132517号〕。
一方、最近、社会資本の蓄積と共にスクラツプ
が増加する傾向にあり、このため製鋼補助原料と
してスクラツプの使用量を増やすことが重要な課
題となつてきた。
しかし、溶銑予備処理、例えばトーピード脱P
を施した場合には、脱P処理後の温度が1250℃程
度にまで低下してしまう。その上、一般に溶銑脱
Pを実施すると脱P溶銑には[Si]が殆んど無く
なる上、溶銑[C]濃度も一部低下する(脱P銑
[C]濃度≒4重量%)ことから、次工程の脱C
炉での熱源が不足しがちとなる。このため、溶銑
脱Pを実施しない場合に比べ、スクラツプ配合可
能量が少なくなるという問題が指摘されていた。
このようなことから、転炉吹錬の際に該転炉内へ
炭材(コークス等)を添加し、その燃焼熱を利用
してスクラツプの使用可能量を増やす試みもなさ
れているが、この場合には、添加した炭材からS
がピツクアツプされてしまい、得られる溶鋼の
[S]濃度が高くなるという問題があつた。
そのため溶銑脱P時にスクラツプを使用できる
方法の技術開発が必要となつてきた。
ところが、上記(A),(B)及び(C)の溶銑脱P法で
は、トーピード、取鍋、高炉鋳床ともスクラツプ
の添加を意図した構造となつていないことからス
クラツプ溶解が不可能であり、この方法での溶銑
脱P時に無理にスクラツプの投入を試みたとして
も、溶銑の撹拌が弱いので、スクラツプが溶解し
ないものであつた。
これに対して、前記(D)及び(E)に示した溶銑脱P
法の場合には、転炉に用いられ、炉底からガスを
吹き込んで溶銑の撹拌ができるのでスクラツプの
溶解は一応は可能である。実際、前記「鉄と鋼、
(1987年)、S276頁」にも、処理途中で撹拌効果
を増すために倒炉すると言う手段を採用すればス
クラツプの溶解が可能であることが示されてい
る。
しかしながら、上記(D)に示した溶銑脱P法の場
合でも、投入スクラツプの溶解可能量は溶銑中
[Si]及び一部同時に燃焼する溶銑中[C](脱P
処理時の[C]低下:Δ[C]=0.7重量%程度)
の燃焼熱を利用できる範囲に留まるものでしかな
かつた。しかも、前記(D)の方法ではスクラツプ溶
解の熱源を主に溶銑中[Si]に求めているため、
脱Pが有利となるように事前に脱Siすることを前
提としておらず、従つて、生石灰使用量を“事前
脱Pしない溶銑をそのまま通常通りに転炉吹錬し
て鋼とする従前の方法”に匹敵するほど多量とす
る必要があり、溶銑予備処理による便益自体がそ
れほど期待できるものとは言えなかつた。
〈発明が解決しようとする課題〉
このような状況にあつて、本発明が目的とした
のは、溶銑を事前脱Pすることによる便益を損な
わずに、しかも[S]濃度アツプや温度低下等の
不都合を招くことなく大きな割合でスクラツプの
添加・溶解が行える溶銑脱P方法を提供すること
である。
〈課題を解決するための手段〉
そして、本発明者等は、前記目的を達成すべく
種々の観点から研究を行い、次に示すような知見
を得るに至つた。
(a) 前述の特願昭61−132517号として提案された
方法(2基の上下両吹き転炉の一方を脱P炉、
他方を脱C炉とし、脱P炉へ注入した溶銑に前
記脱C炉で発生した転炉滓を主成分とする精錬
材を添加して底吹きガス撹拌を行いつつ酸素吹
錬して溶銑脱Pを行つた後、得られた脱P溶銑
を脱C炉にて脱C並びに仕上げ脱Pする方法)
における脱P処理工程の如き、溶銑を上下両吹
き転炉にて脱P剤の投入下で吹錬して事前脱P
する際、スクラツプと共に熱源としてコークス
等の炭材をも投入して吹錬を実施すると、従来
試みられたところの「その後の転炉吹錬(脱C
炉吹錬)でスクラツプと共に炭材を添加して行
うスクラツプ溶解」の場合とは異なり、炭材か
ら溶銑に浸入しがちなSは十分に存在する脱P
スラグに捕捉されて脱Sもなされることとな
り、投入炭材の燃焼熱によつて十分なスクラツ
プの溶解量が確保されるにも係わらず、脱P後
の[S]濃度は格別な上昇傾向を見せないこ
と。
(b) ただ、このように、溶銑脱P時にコークス等
の炭材と上吹酸素とにより加熱してスクラツプ
溶解を行うと、炭材が存在するため、脱Pスラ
グ中の酸化鉄分が還元されて脱P率が悪化する
との問題があつたが、この問題は、スクラツプ
及び炭材を添加して酸素吹精を行う初期には脱
P剤の一部のみを添加しておき、スクラツプ溶
解期が終了した時点にて酸素上吹き量を前述の
特願昭61−132517号等に示された「上下両吹き
転炉での溶銑脱P法」における平時の少量に低
減すると共に脱P剤の残部を添加し、この状態
で所定の時間(10〜15分程度)脱P処理を行う
と、残部の脱P剤中の酸化剤(酸化鉄、Mn鉱
石)によりスラグ中の酸化鉄(T.Fe)が脱P
有利なレベルまで確保されて良好な脱Pが進行
するので十分に払拭されてしまうこと。
この発明は、上記知見に基づいてなされたもの
であり、
「上下両吹き機能を有する転炉形式の炉に注銑
した溶銑に脱P剤を添加し、底吹ガス撹拌を行い
つつ酸素ガスを上吹きして溶銑脱Pを行うに当
り、まず前記脱P剤の一部とスクラツプ及び炭材
とを溶銑に添加して酸素を上吹きし、スクラツプ
を溶解した後、残部の脱P剤を添加することによ
り、不純物量アツプ等の不都合を伴うことなく溶
銑脱P処理時のスクラツプ溶解量を向上させ得る
ようにした点」
に特徴を有するものである。
なお、ここで言う「上下両吹き機能を有した転
炉形式の炉」としては、LD転炉を基本とし、そ
の炉底からAr,N2,CO2,CO或いはO2ガスを
0.03〜0.30Nm3/min・t程度吹き込んで補助的
撹拌を与えるところの、所謂“複合吹錬転炉”を
代表的なものとして挙げることができる。
また、脱P剤は格別に特定されるものではない
が、滓化の点や製鋼トータルコスト低減の観点か
らは、特願昭61−132517号に示される如き“脱C
炉で発生したP2O5の低い(例えば1重量%以下)
転炉滓”を基本成分とした“転炉滓−酸化鉄−ホ
タル石系”或いは“転炉滓−マンガン鉱石−ホタ
ル石系”が良く、これに生石灰を加えてもよい。
勿論、トーピードや取鍋での溶銑脱Pに通常用い
られる生石灰−酸化鉄−ホタル石系であつてもか
まわないことは前述の通りである。しかしなが
ら、後者のフラツクスは転炉滓系の脱P剤に比べ
て滓化性が悪いので、途中で倒炉を実施する等の
滓化促進手段が必要な場合がある。
脱P剤の使用量としては、転炉滓を主成分とす
るもので概ね50Kg/t程度でよいが、スラグの塩
基度(CaO/SiO2)を2以上、できれば2.5〜3.0
以上に設定するのが脱Sの面から好ましい。なぜ
なら、本発明法を実施する際にはコークス等の炭
材から溶銑中にSが浸入する傾向にあることは前
述した通りであるが、脱P後の[S]を高くしな
いためには脱Pスラグによる脱Sが重要となつて
くるからである。
脱P剤の形状・粒径等も格別に制限される訳で
はなく、例えば粒状のものを殊更に粉状とする必
要等は全くない。
使用する炭剤としてはコークスが一般的である
が、燃料となるものであれば格別に種類を問うも
のではない。勿論、コークス等では低Sのものが
好ましいが、脱P処理時に脱Pスラグによる脱S
も進行することから、S含有量が0.5重量%程度
の通常品で十分である。ただ、炭材のS含有量が
高い場合には、上述したように、スラグの塩基度
を2.5〜3.0以上に調整するのが良い。
炭材の添加量は、処理前の溶銑温度、処理後の
目標温度及び使用スクラツプ量によつても異なる
が、スクラツプ比増分1%当りコークスとして1
〜3Kg/t程度が一応の目安である。
炭材粒径は、コークスの場合で1〜100mm程度
の通常品でよいが、コークスの使用効率を高く
し、溶銑の[C]を低くしないとの観点からは、
飛散しない範囲で出来るだけ小粒径のものとする
のが好ましい。
使用スクラツプ量は脱P処理に与えられる時間
によつても異なるが、スクラツプ比増分で10%程
度以下が通常である。勿論、これより多くても基
本的には可能である。
添加スクラツプの形状としては、スクラツプが
溶銑予備処理段階で添加されるものであり、かつ
低温での溶解であることから、トリマー屑のよう
にできるだけ軽量の屑が好ましい。また、もしス
クラツプの寸法が大きい場合には炉底撹拌をでき
るだけ多くし、スクラツプの溶解を促進すること
が重要である。スクラツプの添加方法としては、
溶銑を転炉に注銑する前に装入しておいても良
く、また、注銑の後、脱P剤の一部及びコークス
と共にスクラツプシュートで装入しても良い。
続いて、本発明に係る溶銑脱P工程の詳細を、
その作用と共に説明する。
〈作用〉
本発明に係る溶銑脱P処理では、まずその初期
に脱P剤の一部とスクラツプ及びコークスの添加
がなされ、通常、上吹き酸素によつてスクラツプ
の加熱・溶解が行われる。そして、スクラツプ溶
解が終了した後、残部の脱P剤が加えられて脱P
精錬期に入る。
第1図は、上記本発明法の1例を、脱P剤や炭
材の添加量並びに上吹き酸素量を付記して図示し
たものであり(スクラツプ比増分約5%の場合)、
第2図は同様に別の例を示したものであるが、ス
クラツプ溶解期と脱P期との特徴点を以下に述べ
る。
スクラツプ溶解期
スクラツプ溶解期は、単に加熱してスクラツプ
の溶解を行うだけであるならばスクラツプとコー
クスを添加して酸素を上吹きするのみで良い訳で
あるが、この場合でも、スラグが存在しないと
a スピツテイング(1mmφ以下の粒鉄飛散)及
びヒユームロスの増加によりFe歩留が低下す
る、
b 溶銑中[Si]が酸化され、これによつて生じ
る酸性のSiO2が塩基性の耐火物の溶損を助長
する、
c 上吹き酸素によつてコークスばかりでなく溶
銑中[C]の燃焼も起こりやすく、溶銑中
[C]が低下してしまう(即ち、スラグが存在
するとコークスは一般にスラグ上に浮いた状態
となり、酸素ガスのソフトブローでこれを燃え
易くすることが可能となる)、
等の不都合が生じる。従つて、カバースラグが必
要な訳である。
そして、このカバースラグ形成のために脱P剤
の一部或いは大半を添加すると、これがスクラツ
プ溶解期に十分に滓化してしまうため、次の脱P
期での脱Pを有利にする。
スクラツプ溶解期の上吹き酸素量は、一般的に
は脱C吹錬の時と同程度(2〜4Nm3/min・t)
で良い。但し、溶銑中[C]の低減を少なくして
コークスの燃焼を主に行わせるためには、後述す
る酸素ガスのソフトブロー以外に、酸素ガス吹込
速度を幾分小さくすることも好ましい。なぜな
ら、酸素ガス吹込速度を小さくした場合には、
“酸素ガスによる溶銑中[C]の低下(脱C)現
象”に比べて遅れがちな“コークスによる浸炭”
の時間がかせげるためである。
吹錬条件としては、溶銑中[C]よりもスラグ
中のコークス粒が燃え易くなるように出来るだけ
ソフトブローとすることが重要である。また、こ
れによつて効果的な2次燃焼(燃焼して生成した
COガスが上吹き酸素により更にCO2にまで燃焼
する現象で、この際の燃焼熱も有利に利用でき
る)も期待できる。なお、この2次燃焼は溶銑脱
P時のように低温ほど起こり易く、かつ炉の耐火
物も脱C主吹錬或いは一般的な転炉吹錬の時に比
べ低温であるために耐火物溶損と言つた問題を生
じることもない。
上記ソフトブローを実施する場合は、ランスノ
ズルの設計を工夫したり或いはランス−湯面間距
離を大きくして、L/L0(L:O2ジエツトによる
メタル浴へこみ深さ、L0:メタル浴深さ)の比
率が0.1以下となるように吹錬するのが望ましい。
この時のコークスと上吹き酸素量の割合は、コ
ークスが燃焼するのに必要な化学量論的な酸素量
で決定される。しかしながら、2次燃焼に必要な
酸素量も考慮することが必要なことは言うまでも
ない。
脱P処理の所要時間は、スクラツプ比増分1%
で1分程度であり、スクラツプ5%では5分程度
である。
脱P期
脱P期で重要なことは、スクラツプ溶解期に形
成されたスラグが、時たま陥る“酸化鉄量が少な
くなつて脱Pが不利な状態”にならないように注
意する点である。このため、脱P期にはスラグの
酸化力を上げるべく、酸化鉄或いはMn鉱石を添
加することが重要である。
脱P期での上吹き酸素量は、0.5Nm3/min・t
程度の少量でよい。
脱P期の所要時間は、通常5〜15分でよい。
ここで、脱P率を考慮した場合には、脱P期の
溶銑温度は1400℃以下に抑えることが重要であ
る。なぜなら、溶銑温度が1400℃を超えると溶銑
中[C]によつて脱Pスラグの酸化鉄が還元され
てしまい(スラグ中のT.Feは2%以上必要)、脱
Pが悪化するためである。
ところが、本発明に係る溶銑脱P処理を行う前
の原料溶銑中[Si]濃度は、通常の高炉銑のそれ
程度(0.2〜0.6重量%)でもよいが、脱P率の点
からは[Si]<0.3重量%とするのが望ましい。そ
して、このためには高炉鋳床或いはトーピード等
での事前脱Siも重要である。
次いで、この発明を実施例によつて具体的に説
明する。
〈実施例〉
実施例 1
脱P炉として使用する上下両吹き複合吹錬転炉
に、トリマー屑11トンを装入し、次いでトーピー
ド内で脱S・脱Si処理した第1表上段に示す溶銑
160トンを注銑した。
次いで、同形式の脱C炉で発生した転炉滓を冷
却・凝固して30mm以下の粒径に破砕したもの:25
Kg/t、同様粒径の鉄鉱石:5Kg/t及びホタル
石:8Kg/tを添加すると共に、コークス粒を11
Kg/t添加し、上吹ランス−湯面間距離:3m
で、3Nm3/min・tの送酸量で酸素ガスを4分
間上吹きして加熱スクラツプ(トリマー屑)溶解
を実施した。
なお、第1表中段は、スクラツプ溶解後の溶銑
組成を示している。
<Industrial Application Field> The present invention provides a method for dephosphorizing hot metal (hereinafter referred to as dephosphorization) that can dissolve a large amount of steelmaking auxiliary raw material scrap without adversely affecting the product composition. It is about the method. <Conventional technology> In response to the increasing quality requirements for various steel materials in recent years, efforts have been made to produce low-P steel at low cost and to rationalize costs as a total steel manufacturing system (reducing the total amount of slag-forming agent used, converter With the aim of reducing ferromanganese by melting and reducing Mn ore in steelmaking, hot metal dephosphorization treatment, which removes phosphor from hot metal before steelmaking, has been actively adopted. The following methods are representative of the hot metal dephosphorization treatment methods that have been proposed so far. (A) A method in which quicklime-based flux or soda ash is injected into hot metal in a torpedo. (B) A method in which quicklime-based flux is injected or blasted onto hot metal in a ladle. (C) A method in which quicklime-based flux is blasted onto the hot metal in the blast furnace casthouse trough. (D) A method of blowing using a quicklime-based flux using an upper and lower blowing converter [Tetsu to Hagane, (1987),
S276 pages]. (E) A method of blowing using an upper and lower blowing converter and using the converter slag (produced in the decarbonization furnace) as the main component of the dephosphorizing agent [Patent Application No. 132517/1982]. On the other hand, there has recently been a tendency for scrap to increase with the accumulation of social capital, and for this reason, increasing the amount of scrap used as an auxiliary raw material for steelmaking has become an important issue. However, hot metal pretreatment, such as torpedo dephosphorization,
If this is done, the temperature after deP treatment will drop to about 1250°C. Furthermore, when hot metal is generally dephosphorized, there is almost no [Si] in the dephosphorized hot metal, and the hot metal [C] concentration also partially decreases (dephosphorized pig iron [C] concentration ≒ 4% by weight). , decarbonization in the next step
The heat source in the furnace tends to be insufficient. For this reason, it has been pointed out that there is a problem that the amount of scrap that can be added is smaller than when hot metal dephosphorization is not performed.
For this reason, attempts have been made to increase the usable amount of scrap by adding carbonaceous materials (coke, etc.) into the converter during converter blowing and utilizing the combustion heat. In this case, S from the added carbon material
There was a problem in that the [S] concentration in the obtained molten steel was increased because the molten steel was picked up. Therefore, it has become necessary to develop a method that allows the use of scrap when depurating hot metal. However, in the hot metal dephosphorization methods described in (A), (B), and (C) above, scrap melting is impossible because the torpedo, ladle, and blast furnace cast bed are not designed to add scrap. Even if an attempt was made to forcibly introduce scrap during depuration of hot metal using this method, the scrap would not dissolve because the stirring of the hot metal was weak. On the other hand, the hot metal removal P shown in (D) and (E) above
In the case of the method, it is used in a converter, and the hot metal can be stirred by blowing gas from the bottom of the furnace, so it is possible to melt the scrap. In fact, the above-mentioned “iron and steel,
(1987), p. S276'' also indicates that it is possible to melt scrap by adopting a method of overturning the furnace to increase the stirring effect during processing. However, even in the case of the hot metal dephosphorization method shown in (D) above, the dissolvable amount of the input scrap is [Si] in the hot metal and [C] in the hot metal that is partially burned at the same time (dephosphorization
[C] decrease during processing: Δ[C] = about 0.7% by weight)
It was only possible to utilize the heat of combustion. Moreover, in method (D) above, the heat source for scrap melting is mainly found in the hot metal [Si].
In order to make deP more advantageous, it is not assumed that Si is removed in advance, and therefore the amount of quicklime used is reduced by ``conventional method of blowing hot metal without pre-deP into steel as usual in a converter''. Therefore, the benefits of hot metal pretreatment cannot be expected to be that great. <Problems to be Solved by the Invention> Under these circumstances, the purpose of the present invention is to reduce the increase in [S] concentration, decrease in temperature, etc. without impairing the benefits of pre-dephosphorizing hot metal. It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for dephosphorizing hot metal that can add and dissolve a large proportion of scrap without causing any inconvenience. <Means for Solving the Problems> In order to achieve the above object, the present inventors conducted research from various viewpoints and came to obtain the following knowledge. (a) The method proposed in the above-mentioned Japanese Patent Application No. 132517/1983 (one of the two upper and lower blowing converters is replaced with a dephosphorizing furnace,
The other is a carbon removal furnace, and a refining material mainly composed of converter slag generated in the carbon removal furnace is added to the hot metal injected into the carbon removal furnace, and the hot metal is removed by oxygen blowing while bottom-blowing gas is stirred. After performing P, the resulting dephosphorized hot metal is decarbonized and finished dephosphorous in a decarbonizing furnace)
As in the deP treatment process in
When blowing is carried out by adding carbonaceous materials such as coke as a heat source along with scrap, it is possible to avoid subsequent converter blowing (decarbonization), which was previously attempted.
Unlike "scrap melting," which is performed by adding carbonaceous materials together with scrap during furnace blowing, there is sufficient S, which tends to infiltrate from the carbonaceous materials into the hot metal.
S is captured in the slag and removed, and even though a sufficient amount of scrap is dissolved by the combustion heat of the input carbonaceous material, the [S] concentration after deP tends to rise significantly. Don't show it. (b) However, when scrap melting is performed by heating with carbonaceous materials such as coke and top-blown oxygen during hot metal dephosphorization, the iron oxide content in the dephosphorization slag is reduced due to the presence of carbonaceous materials. However, this problem was solved by adding only a part of the dephosphorizing agent at the beginning of oxygen blowing after adding scrap and carbonaceous material, and during the scrap dissolution stage. When the above-mentioned process is completed, the amount of oxygen top blowing is reduced to the normal amount in the "Hot metal dephosphorization method using a double blowing converter" as shown in the above-mentioned patent application No. 132517/1986, etc., and the amount of dephosphorization agent is reduced. When the remaining part is added and dephosphorization is performed for a predetermined period of time (about 10 to 15 minutes) in this state, iron oxide (T. Fe) de-P
It is secured to an advantageous level and good P removal progresses, so it is sufficiently wiped out. This invention was made based on the above knowledge, and is based on the following: ``Dephosphorizing agent is added to hot metal poured into a converter-type furnace with both upper and lower blowing functions, and oxygen gas is removed while bottom blowing gas is stirred. To dephosphorize hot metal by top-blowing, first add a portion of the desulfurization agent, scrap and carbonaceous material to the hot metal, top-blow oxygen to dissolve the scrap, and then remove the remaining desulfurization agent. It is characterized by the fact that the amount of scrap dissolved during hot metal dephosphorization treatment can be improved by adding it, without causing any inconvenience such as an increase in the amount of impurities. The "converter type furnace with both upper and lower blowing functions" referred to here is basically an LD converter, which blows Ar, N 2 , CO 2 , CO or O 2 gas from the bottom of the furnace.
A typical example is a so-called "compound blowing converter" in which supplementary stirring is provided by blowing at a rate of about 0.03 to 0.30 Nm 3 /min·t. In addition, although the dephosphorizing agent is not particularly specified, from the viewpoint of reducing slag and reducing the total cost of steelmaking, it is recommended to
Low P 2 O 5 generated in the furnace (e.g. 1% by weight or less)
A ``converter slag-iron oxide-fluorspar system'' or a ``converter slag-manganese ore-fluorspar system'' in which the basic component is ``converter slag'' are good, and quicklime may be added thereto.
Of course, as mentioned above, the quicklime-iron oxide-fluorite system, which is commonly used for hot metal dephosphorization in a torpedo or ladle, may be used. However, since the latter flux has poor sludge-forming properties compared to the converter slag-based dephosphorization agent, it may be necessary to take measures to promote sludge-forming, such as collapsing the furnace during the process. The amount of dephosphorizing agent to be used is approximately 50 kg/t, which is mainly composed of converter slag, but the basicity of the slag (CaO/SiO 2 ) should be 2 or more, preferably 2.5 to 3.0.
It is preferable to set the above value from the viewpoint of eliminating S. This is because, as mentioned above, when carrying out the method of the present invention, S tends to infiltrate into the hot metal from carbonaceous materials such as coke, but in order to prevent the [S] level after deP from becoming high, it is necessary to This is because removal of S by P slag becomes important. There are no particular restrictions on the shape, particle size, etc. of the dephosphorizing agent; for example, there is no need to transform a granular agent into a powder. Coke is commonly used as a carbonaceous agent, but the type is not particularly important as long as it can be used as a fuel. Of course, it is preferable to use coke with low S content, but during deP treatment, deS
Since this also progresses, a regular product with an S content of about 0.5% by weight is sufficient. However, when the S content of the carbonaceous material is high, as mentioned above, it is preferable to adjust the basicity of the slag to 2.5 to 3.0 or more. The amount of carbon material added varies depending on the hot metal temperature before treatment, the target temperature after treatment, and the amount of scrap used, but it is 1% coke per 1% increase in scrap ratio.
~3Kg/t is a rough guideline. In the case of coke, a standard carbon material particle size of about 1 to 100 mm is sufficient, but from the viewpoint of increasing coke usage efficiency and not lowering the [C] of hot metal,
It is preferable to make the particle size as small as possible without scattering. The amount of scrap used varies depending on the time given to the P removal process, but the scrap ratio increment is usually about 10% or less. Of course, it is basically possible to have more than this. As for the shape of the added scrap, it is preferable to use scraps that are as light as possible, such as trimmer scraps, since the scraps are added at the hot metal pretreatment stage and are melted at low temperatures. Furthermore, if the size of the scrap is large, it is important to increase the stirring at the bottom of the furnace as much as possible to promote the dissolution of the scrap. How to add scraps:
Hot metal may be charged before pouring into the converter, or after pouring, it may be charged together with a portion of the dephosphorizing agent and coke in a scrap chute. Next, details of the hot metal dephosphorization process according to the present invention,
This will be explained along with its effect. <Function> In the hot metal dephosphorization treatment according to the present invention, a part of the dephosphorization agent, scrap, and coke are added at the initial stage, and the scrap is usually heated and melted using top-blown oxygen. After the scrap dissolution is completed, the remaining dephosphorizing agent is added to dephosphorize.
Entering the refining period. FIG. 1 shows an example of the above-mentioned method of the present invention, with the amounts of dephosphorization agent and carbonaceous material added, and the amount of top-blown oxygen added (in the case of a scrap ratio increment of about 5%).
FIG. 2 similarly shows another example, and the characteristics of the scrap dissolution period and the de-P phase will be described below. Scrap melting stage In the scrap melting stage, if the scrap is simply melted by heating, it is sufficient to add scrap and coke and top-blow oxygen, but even in this case, there is no slag present. (a) The Fe yield decreases due to spitting (scattering of iron particles with a diameter of 1 mm or less) and an increase in fume loss; (b) [Si] in the hot metal is oxidized, and the resulting acidic SiO 2 dissolves in the basic refractory. (c) Top-blown oxygen tends to cause combustion of not only coke but also [C] in the hot metal, reducing the [C] in the hot metal (i.e., if slag is present, coke is generally deposited on top of the slag). This results in inconveniences such as floating particles, which can be made more flammable by soft blowing with oxygen gas. Therefore, a cover slug is necessary. If part or most of the dephosphorizing agent is added to form this cover slag, this will turn into slag during the scrap dissolution stage, so the next dephosphorizing agent will be removed.
Make it advantageous to withdraw from P during the period. The amount of top-blown oxygen during scrap melting is generally about the same as during decarbonization blowing (2 to 4 Nm 3 /min・t).
That's fine. However, in order to reduce the reduction in [C] in the hot metal and mainly burn coke, it is also preferable to reduce the oxygen gas blowing speed somewhat in addition to soft blowing of oxygen gas, which will be described later. This is because when the oxygen gas blowing speed is reduced,
“Carburizing by coke” tends to be delayed compared to “reduction of [C] in hot metal due to oxygen gas (decarbonization)”
This is to save time. As for the blowing conditions, it is important to make the blowing as soft as possible so that the coke grains in the slag burn more easily than in the hot metal [C]. This also allows for effective secondary combustion (burned and generated
This is a phenomenon in which CO gas is further combusted into CO 2 by top-blown oxygen, and the heat of combustion at this time can also be used advantageously). This secondary combustion is more likely to occur at lower temperatures, such as during hot metal deP, and since the refractory in the furnace is also at a lower temperature than during decarbonization main blowing or general converter blowing, refractory melting may occur. It does not cause the problem mentioned above. When carrying out the above soft blowing, the design of the lance nozzle must be devised or the distance between the lance and the hot water surface must be increased so that L/L 0 (L: Depth of depression in the metal bath due to O 2 jet, L 0 : Metal It is desirable to blow so that the ratio (bath depth) is 0.1 or less. The ratio of coke to top-blown oxygen at this time is determined by the stoichiometric amount of oxygen required to burn the coke. However, it goes without saying that it is necessary to consider the amount of oxygen required for secondary combustion. The time required for deP processing is 1% increment of scrap ratio.
It takes about 1 minute for 5% scrap, and about 5 minutes for 5% scrap. DeP phase What is important in the deP phase is to be careful not to put the slag formed during the scrap dissolution phase into a situation where the amount of iron oxide is so low that deP becomes disadvantageous. For this reason, it is important to add iron oxide or Mn ore to increase the oxidizing power of the slag during the deP phase. The amount of top-blown oxygen during the dephosphorization phase is 0.5Nm 3 /min・t
A small amount is sufficient. The time required for the deP phase is usually 5 to 15 minutes. Here, when taking the P removal rate into consideration, it is important to suppress the hot metal temperature during the P removal period to 1400°C or less. This is because when the hot metal temperature exceeds 1400℃, the iron oxide in the dephosphorization slag is reduced by [C] in the hot metal (T.Fe in the slag needs to be 2% or more), worsening dephosphorization. be. However, the [Si] concentration in the raw hot metal before performing the hot metal dephosphorization treatment according to the present invention may be about that of ordinary blast furnace pig iron (0.2 to 0.6% by weight), but from the viewpoint of the dephosphorization rate, [Si] ]<0.3% by weight is desirable. For this purpose, it is also important to remove Si in advance in a blast furnace casthouse or torpedo. Next, the present invention will be specifically explained with reference to Examples. <Example> Example 1 11 tons of trimmer scraps were charged into an upper and lower double blowing combined blowing converter used as a deP furnace, and then the hot metal shown in the upper row of Table 1 was subjected to deS and deSi treatment in a torpedo.
160 tons of iron was poured. Next, the converter slag generated in the same type of carbon removal furnace is cooled and solidified and crushed into particles with a particle size of 30 mm or less: 25
Kg/t, iron ore of similar particle size: 5 Kg/t and fluorite: 8 Kg/t, and coke grains were added to 11 kg/t.
Kg/t added, distance between top blowing lance and melt surface: 3m
Then, oxygen gas was blown upward for 4 minutes at an oxygen flow rate of 3 Nm 3 /min·t to dissolve heated scrap (trimmer debris). The middle row of Table 1 shows the composition of hot metal after scrap melting.
【表】
続いて、スクラツプの溶け落ち後、ランス−湯
面間距離を2mにすると共に、送酸量を0.5N
m3/min・tに低下させ、鉄鉱石:5Kg/tを添
加して10分間の吹錬(脱P処理)を実施した。
この結果、後述する従来法(比較法)よりもス
クラツプ比増加分を5%として第1表下段に示す
成分組成の溶銑が得られた。この第1表からも、
良好な脱P率の下で[S]アツプ少なく溶銑脱P
処理が出来たことが確認できる。
そして、本処理を行つた後の脱C炉でのスクラ
ツプ溶解能力をも合わせて考えると、本処理法の
適用により、得られる溶銑のスクラツプ溶解能力
(溶銑温度)は溶銑脱Pをしない場合のそれと何
ら遜色のないことも分かる。
なお、使用した脱P炉の精錬条件は次の通りで
あつた。
上吹きO2ランスノズル:3孔ラバール、
炉底吹込み撹拌ガス:CO2ガス、
撹拌ガス量:0.2Nm3/min・t。
実施例 2
スクラツプ溶解期の脱P剤として転炉滓:15
Kg/tとホタル石:4Kg/tを添加した以外は実
施例1と同様条件でスクラツプ溶解を行い(炭材
としてコークス粒:11Kg/tを添加したことは勿
論である)、これに続いてランス−湯面間を2m
とし、かつ送酸量を0.5Nm3/min・tに低下させ
ると共に、転炉滓:10Kg/t、生石灰:5Kg/
t、Mn鉱石:5Kg/t及びホタル石:4Kg/t
を添加して8分間吹錬(脱P処理)を実施した
後、更にMn鉱石:5Kg/tを添加し2分間の延
長吹錬(脱P処理)を実施して溶銑脱P処理を終
えた。
この結果、実施例1の場合と同様に十分に満足
できるスクラツプ溶解が実施でき、第2表に示す
ような成分組成の溶銑を得ることができた。[Table] After the scrap has melted down, the distance between the lance and the hot water surface is set to 2m, and the amount of oxygen supplied is set to 0.5N.
m 3 /min·t, 5 kg/t of iron ore was added, and blowing (deP treatment) was carried out for 10 minutes. As a result, hot metal having the composition shown in the lower row of Table 1 was obtained with an increase in scrap ratio of 5% compared to the conventional method (comparative method) described later. From this table 1,
Hot metal dephosphorization with less [S] build-up under good dephosphorization rate
You can confirm that the process has been completed. Considering also the scrap melting ability in the decarbonization furnace after this treatment, the scrap melting ability (hot metal temperature) of the hot metal obtained by applying this treatment method is the same as that without dephosphorization. I can see that there is no difference between this and that. The refining conditions of the deP furnace used were as follows. Top-blown O2 lance nozzle: 3-hole Laval, stirring gas blown into the bottom of the furnace: CO 2 gas, stirring gas amount: 0.2Nm 3 /min・t. Example 2 Converter slag as a dephosphorizing agent during the scrap dissolution stage: 15
Scrap melting was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that 4 kg/t of fluorite and 4 kg/t of fluorite were added (of course, 11 kg/t of coke grains were added as a carbon material), and then 2m between lance and hot water surface
At the same time, the amount of oxygen fed was reduced to 0.5Nm 3 /min・t, and converter slag: 10Kg/t, quicklime: 5Kg/t.
t, Mn ore: 5Kg/t and fluorite: 4Kg/t
was added and blowing was carried out for 8 minutes (deP treatment), then 5 kg/t of Mn ore was added and extended blowing (deP treatment) was carried out for 2 minutes to complete the hot metal deP treatment. . As a result, as in Example 1, sufficiently satisfactory scrap melting could be carried out, and hot metal having the composition shown in Table 2 could be obtained.
【表】
上記第2表に示される結果からも明らかな如
く、この処理により良好な脱燐率でもつてスクラ
ツプ溶解を伴う溶銑脱P処理が実施され、しかも
溶銑[Mn]濃度を効果的に上昇させ得たことが
分かる。
比較例 1
実施例1と同様条件の上下両吹き複合吹錬転炉
を使用し、これにトリマー屑を装入すると共に、
トーピード内で脱S・脱Si処理した第3表上段に
示す成分組成の溶銑160トンを注銑し、更に実施
例1と同様の転炉滓:25Kg/t、鉄鉱石:10Kg/
t及びホタル石:8Kg/tを添加して、上吹ラン
ス−湯面間距離:2m、送酸量:0.5Nm3/min・
tでそのまま10分間の脱P吹錬を実施し、第3表
下段に示す成分組成の溶銑を得た。[Table] As is clear from the results shown in Table 2 above, this treatment enables hot metal dephosphorization accompanied by scrap dissolution with a good dephosphorization rate, and also effectively increases the hot metal [Mn] concentration. I know that I was able to do it. Comparative Example 1 A top and bottom double blowing combined blowing converter under the same conditions as in Example 1 was used, and trimmer scrap was charged therein.
160 tons of hot metal having the composition shown in the upper row of Table 3, which had been subjected to S and Si removal treatment in a torpedo, was poured, and the same converter slag as in Example 1: 25 kg/t, iron ore: 10 kg/t.
t and fluorite: 8 kg/t, distance between top blowing lance and hot water surface: 2 m, oxygen supply amount: 0.5 Nm 3 /min・
At t, dephosphorization blowing was continued for 10 minutes to obtain hot metal having the composition shown in the lower row of Table 3.
【表】
なお、この場合、熱源の関係でスクラツプたる
トリマー屑は3トンしか装入することができなか
つた。
上記第3表からは、良好な脱P率で溶銑の脱P
処理を実施できたことが確認できるが、この処理
ではスクラツプ比:2%のスクラツプ溶解しかで
きなかつた。
比較例 2
脱P剤の総てをスクラツプ溶解期に添加した以
外は実施例1と同一条件で溶銑脱Pを実施したと
ころ、第4表に示す結果が得られた。[Table] In this case, only 3 tons of scrap trimmer waste could be charged due to the heat source. From Table 3 above, it is clear that hot metal is dephosphorized with a good dephosphorization rate.
Although it can be confirmed that the treatment was successful, this treatment was only able to dissolve scraps at a scrap ratio of 2%. Comparative Example 2 Hot metal dephosphorization was carried out under the same conditions as in Example 1 except that all of the dephosphorizing agent was added during the scrap melting period, and the results shown in Table 4 were obtained.
【表】
上記第4表の結果からも明らかなように、スク
ラツプ溶解期にのみ脱P剤を添加し、続く脱P期
に新たな脱P剤を添加しなかつた場合には、十分
な比率のスクラツプ溶解ができるものの、脱P率
が悪化することが分かる。
〈効果の総括〉
以上に説明した如く、この発明によれば、大き
いスクラツプ使用比率で煩雑な操作を必要とする
ことなくスクラツプ溶解を行うことができ、しか
も脱P率その他の悪影響を受けることもない溶銑
脱P処理方法を提供することができ、産業上極め
て有用な効果がもたらされるのである。[Table] As is clear from the results in Table 4 above, if a dephosphorizing agent is added only during the scrap dissolution period and no new dephosphorizing agent is added during the subsequent dephosphorizing period, a sufficient ratio It can be seen that although scrap dissolution is possible, the dephosphorization rate deteriorates. <Summary of Effects> As explained above, according to the present invention, it is possible to perform scrap melting without requiring complicated operations at a large scrap usage ratio, and without having to suffer from adverse effects on the P removal rate or other adverse effects. Therefore, it is possible to provide a hot metal dephosphorization treatment method that is not available in the past, and extremely useful effects can be brought about industrially.
第1図は、本発明法の1例を、脱P剤や炭材の
添加量並びに上吹き酸素量を付記して図示したも
のである。第2図は、本発明法の別の例を示した
ものである。
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of the method of the present invention, with the addition amounts of the dephosphorizing agent and carbonaceous material and the amount of top-blown oxygen added. FIG. 2 shows another example of the method of the present invention.
Claims (1)
した溶銑に脱燐剤を添加し、底吹ガス撹拌を行い
つつ酸素ガスを上吹きして溶銑脱燐を行うに当
り、まず前記脱燐剤の一部とスクラツプ及び炭材
とを溶銑に添加して酸素を上吹きし、スクラツプ
を溶解した後、残部の脱燐剤を添加することを特
徴とするスクラツプ溶解を伴う溶銑脱燐方法。1. When dephosphorizing the hot metal by adding a dephosphorizing agent to the hot metal poured into a converter-type furnace having both top and bottom blowing functions and blowing oxygen gas upward while stirring the bottom blowing gas, first the dephosphorization is performed. A hot metal dephosphorization method involving scrap melting, characterized in that a part of the phosphorifying agent, scrap and carbon material are added to the hot metal, oxygen is top blown to melt the scrap, and then the remaining dephosphorizing agent is added. .
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63144815A JPH01316409A (en) | 1988-06-14 | 1988-06-14 | Method for dephosphorizing molten iron accompanied with scrap melting |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63144815A JPH01316409A (en) | 1988-06-14 | 1988-06-14 | Method for dephosphorizing molten iron accompanied with scrap melting |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH01316409A JPH01316409A (en) | 1989-12-21 |
| JPH0437136B2 true JPH0437136B2 (en) | 1992-06-18 |
Family
ID=15371106
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP63144815A Granted JPH01316409A (en) | 1988-06-14 | 1988-06-14 | Method for dephosphorizing molten iron accompanied with scrap melting |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH01316409A (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP5230062B2 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2013-07-10 | 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | Operation method of converter facilities |
| JP2010084154A (en) * | 2008-09-29 | 2010-04-15 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Method for dephosphorizing molten iron |
| JP2013209738A (en) * | 2011-04-27 | 2013-10-10 | Jfe Steel Corp | Method of manufacturing molten steel |
| CN103320565B (en) * | 2013-06-19 | 2014-09-17 | 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 | Method for controlling P in smelted H08 welding wire |
| CN103882178A (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2014-06-25 | 首钢总公司 | Converter steelmaking process for recycling converter final slag |
| CN105112598B (en) * | 2015-09-29 | 2017-06-23 | 山东钢铁股份有限公司 | A kind of method that converter product bottom slag is directly used in pneumatic steelmaking |
| CN112111622A (en) * | 2019-06-21 | 2020-12-22 | 上海梅山钢铁股份有限公司 | Blowing method for converter with low molten iron consumption |
-
1988
- 1988-06-14 JP JP63144815A patent/JPH01316409A/en active Granted
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPH01316409A (en) | 1989-12-21 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP2006274349A (en) | Steel refining method | |
| JPH01316409A (en) | Method for dephosphorizing molten iron accompanied with scrap melting | |
| JPH0853705A (en) | Steelmaking method | |
| JP3158912B2 (en) | Stainless steel refining method | |
| JP2653301B2 (en) | Reusing method of low P converter slag | |
| JP2964861B2 (en) | Stainless steel manufacturing method | |
| JP6213174B2 (en) | Converter operation method using dephosphorized pretreatment hot metal. | |
| JP4461495B2 (en) | Dephosphorization method of hot metal | |
| WO2003029498A1 (en) | Method for pretreatment of molten iron and method for refining | |
| JP2007538156A (en) | Chromium reduction method for metallurgical slag | |
| JPH0437137B2 (en) | ||
| JP4411934B2 (en) | Method for producing low phosphorus hot metal | |
| JPH0437135B2 (en) | ||
| JP3063537B2 (en) | Stainless steel manufacturing method | |
| JP2008063645A (en) | Steel making method | |
| JP4598220B2 (en) | Hot metal processing method using decarburized iron | |
| JPH0435529B2 (en) | ||
| JP2000212623A (en) | Hot metal dephosphorization method with little quick lime | |
| JP2587286B2 (en) | Steelmaking method | |
| JPH0557327B2 (en) | ||
| JPH0967608A (en) | Stainless steel manufacturing method | |
| JPH07216429A (en) | Method for producing stainless steel melt using decarburizing slag | |
| JP2002275521A (en) | Dephosphorization refining method of high carbon molten steel | |
| RU2186124C2 (en) | Method of pig iron conversion | |
| JP3194212B2 (en) | Converter steelmaking method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EXPY | Cancellation because of completion of term |