JPH05185B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH05185B2
JPH05185B2 JP16055587A JP16055587A JPH05185B2 JP H05185 B2 JPH05185 B2 JP H05185B2 JP 16055587 A JP16055587 A JP 16055587A JP 16055587 A JP16055587 A JP 16055587A JP H05185 B2 JPH05185 B2 JP H05185B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
particles
particle size
amount
grinding wheel
small
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP16055587A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH012870A (en
JPS642870A (en
Inventor
Noboru Matsumori
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
MIZUHO KENMA TOISHI KK
Original Assignee
MIZUHO KENMA TOISHI KK
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by MIZUHO KENMA TOISHI KK filed Critical MIZUHO KENMA TOISHI KK
Priority to JP16055587A priority Critical patent/JPS642870A/en
Publication of JPH012870A publication Critical patent/JPH012870A/en
Publication of JPS642870A publication Critical patent/JPS642870A/en
Publication of JPH05185B2 publication Critical patent/JPH05185B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

〔産業上の利用分野〕 この発明は多孔性超仕上げ砥石に関するもので
ある。 〔従来の技術〕 一般に、超仕上げ加工においては、加工物表面
の最終仕上げ用砥石として、砥粒粒度(JIS−
R6001「研磨材の粒度」による)には#800(平均
系の平均18〜22μm)から#3000(平均系の平均
5.9〜4.7μm)という微粉粒度が適用され、かつ、
砥石使用面は加工物と面接触した状態で使用され
ることになつている。したがつて、安定して美麗
な仕上がり面を得るためには、砥石組織は均一で
あるとともに、面接触によつて目詰まりまたは目
潰れを生じないように多孔質であることが基本的
に重要であるとされている。 従来の技術においては通常の標準組織からなる
砥石の切削性を改善するために砥石中の気孔容積
を増加して多孔質とした軟位結合度の砥石が選択
の基準とされるが、このような砥石は切削性は向
上しても砥石摩耗量は非常に大きく経済的にはき
わめて不利なものとなり、好ましいものであると
は言えない。このような軟位結合度の砥石は、砥
粒を支持する結合力が結合剤の減少に伴つて弱く
なり、砥石摩耗を激増させることになるので、そ
の対策として、軟位結合度を維持しながら砥粒に
対する結合剤量の割合を増加する方法が採られる
が、結合剤の量の増加に伴つて、結合度が硬くな
らないように有機性粒子などの人工気孔剤が配合
される場合がある(たとえば特開昭59−161269号
公報)。この場合の人工気孔剤は、超仕上げ加工
などの微粒砥石では砥粒と結合剤とからなる砥石
固有の微細で均一な構造組織を維持するうえから
は、大きさが砥粒径よりも小さいかもしくは同等
程度の微細粒のものが適用されることになるの
で、製品砥石の表面は、滑らかで緻密であり、多
孔性砥石特有の微細な有気孔は肉眼では観察する
ことはできない。すなわち、砥石固有組織からの
本質的な改善がなされていないため、砥石結合度
が硬くならない範囲内の結合剤の増量では、砥石
の耐摩耗性は幾分向上はするものの、その効果は
顕著であるとは言えない。また、微細な気孔剤を
多量に使用するときは、砥石断面は焼成前の状態
で見掛け上密となり、亀裂が生じやすくなり、さ
らに焼成時においても骨材としての砥粒の減少に
よつて亀裂、変形などを起こす原因ともなりかね
ないのである。 〔発明が解決しようとする問題点〕 以上述べたように、従来の技術においては、超
仕上げ加工に際して、切削性を損うことなく、耐
摩耗性の優れた多孔性超仕上げ砥石は得られない
という問題点があつた。 〔問題点を解決するための手段〕 上記の問題点を解決するために、この発明は酸
化アルミニウム質、炭化珪素質またはダイヤモン
ド、立方晶窒化ホウ素等の硬質砥粒と、この砥粒
径の20〜50倍の粒子径を有する大粒径粒子および
砥粒径の1.5〜10倍の粒子径を有する小粒径粒子
からなる有機性粒子と、さらにビトリフアイドボ
ンドを配合し、成形および焼成した多孔性超仕上
げ砥石とする手段を採用したものである。以下そ
の詳細を述べる。 まず、この発明に用いる硬質砥粒の粒径は特に
範囲を限定するものではないが、前記した日本工
業規格に準拠して、#800(約20μm)から#3000
(約5μm)の範囲のものが最も多く利用される。
したがつて、多用される粒系の硬質砥粒を用いた
通常の超仕上げ砥石固有の緻密な組織を崩さない
ためには、気孔剤粒子の大きさは平均径で20μm
以下の微細粒子が好ましい。しかし、微細気孔剤
を多量に使用するときは、前記したように、砥石
断面は焼成前の状態で見掛け上密となり亀裂を生
じやすく、また焼成時においても骨材としての砥
粒の割合が減少して、そのために亀裂または変形
が起こりやすくなる。一方砥粒径の20〜50倍とい
う大粒径粒子を単味で気孔剤に使用するときは、
大粒径粒子は小粒径粒子とは異つて骨材としての
役割りを充分に果たすものであるから、その量が
多いときは勿論のこと製造時に亀裂、変形などの
欠陥を生じやすく、その量が少ないときは砥石内
の分散が不均一になり、均質な気孔の分布が達成
されにくくなつて、好ましくない。そこでこの発
明においては、小粒径粒子の粒子の大きさは、砥
石固有組織を大きく崩すことなく、各砥粒の切削
点での切屑の排出機能をより活発にするため、平
均径50μm以(砥粒径の1.5〜10倍)が好ましく、
また、形状の揃つた比較的大きい気孔を砥石内に
均一に分散させ、砥石作用に点在させるために
は、大粒径粒子は平均径100〜500μm(砥粒径の
20〜50倍)の範囲のものが好ましく、粒子の形状
も、気孔の形状が揃うことから、長径および短径
または径および高さの比が1に近いほど望ましい
ということができる。そして、この発明において
は、砥粒径の20〜50倍の粒子径を有する大粒径粒
子と砥粒径の1.5〜10倍の粒子径の小粒子径を有
する小粒径粒子とを混合して気孔剤とするが、混
合に際して最も好ましい配合割合は大粒径粒子1
容量部に対し小粒径粒子2〜5容量部である。こ
こで、大粒径粒子が砥粒径の20倍未満の小さい粒
子径では砥石結合度を容易に軟位とすることも困
難で低切削性となる一方、砥粒径の50倍を越える
大きい粒子径では、砥石製造時に亀裂、変形など
を生じやすく、砥石組織も粗大な網目状の不連続
組織となり砥石消耗量が増加して好ましくないか
らである。また、小粒径粒子が砥粒径の1.5倍未
満の小さい粒子径では砥石固有の緻密な組織とな
り、多孔性砥石素地としての効果が発揮されず、
また10倍を越える大きい粒子径では粗大粒子径の
気孔に接近して大きい径の気孔の形成が増大し、
その結果砥石摩耗量は増加し、前記したような大
粒径の粒子のみからなる多孔性砥石と同様の結果
を招き、効果は減少して好ましくない。さらに、
この発明の大粒径粒子と小粒径粒子との混合割合
において、後者が2容量部未満の小量では砥石母
体の素地は緻密なものとなり切削性は低下し目詰
まりまたは目潰れなどを起こしやすくなり、逆に
5容量部を越える多量では砥石摩耗量は増加し、
添加する効果は低下して好ましくない。 この発明においは、前述の粒径分布を有する有
機性粒子を気孔剤として利用するものである。 一般に気孔剤は成形された砥石を焼成する際に
焼失し、砥石組織内に気孔を形成させるものであ
るから、この発明における有機性粒子はたとえば
スチロール樹脂、アクリル樹脂、ポリエステル樹
脂、変形ポリフエニレンオキシド、エポキシ樹脂
などのように完全に焼失してしまう物質であるこ
とが望ましい。 さらにこの発明で使用するビトリフアイドボン
ドは通常広く使用されているものであり、特に限
定されるものではない。 〔作用〕 この発明においては、砥石摩耗量の少なくて耐
摩耗性の大きい砥石固有の緻密組織に対して大粒
径粒子によつて形成された多孔性組織は砥粒容積
割合を低下させることなく容易に軟位結合度が得
られ、砥石耐摩耗性を損なうことなく、優れた切
削性能を付与する作用を示す。また、この発明に
おいては小粒径粒子によつて砥石素地に形成され
た多孔性組織は、大粒径粒子によつて形成された
砥石作用面に点在する比較的大粒径の気孔に切削
屑が集中して推積することを防ぎ、砥石作用面全
体で一様な切削屑の排出が適宜行なわれるから、
きわめて僅少な量の砥石摩耗状態で良好な切削作
用を維持することが出来るのである。 〔実施例〕 大粒径粒子として粒径400μmの、また小粒径
子として粒径65μmの粒状スチロール樹脂を用意
し、平均粒子径が日本工業規格#1200(13μm)
の白色酸化アルミニウム(WAと略記)砥粒100
重量部に対し、表に示すように、大粒径粒子4.5
容量部および小粒径粒子13.5容量部とを配合した
試料1、さらにWA砥粒100重量部に対して小粒
径粒子のみ13.5容量部を配合し大粒径粒子を配合
しない試料2およびいずれの粒状スチーリ樹脂を
も配合しない試料3を調整した。そして試料砥石
は、
[Industrial Application Field] This invention relates to a porous superfinishing grindstone. [Prior art] In general, in superfinishing, abrasive grain size (JIS-
R6001 (depending on the particle size of the abrasive) ranges from #800 (average of 18 to 22 μm) to #3000 (average of average
A fine particle size of 5.9 to 4.7 μm) is applied, and
The surface of the grinding wheel is intended to be used in surface contact with the workpiece. Therefore, in order to obtain a stable and beautiful finished surface, it is fundamentally important that the grinding wheel structure is uniform and porous to prevent clogging or crushing due to surface contact. It is said that In conventional technology, in order to improve the cutting performance of a grinding wheel with a normal standard structure, the selection criteria is a grinding wheel with a soft bonding degree that is made porous by increasing the pore volume in the grinding wheel. Although the cutting performance of the grindstone is improved, the amount of wear of the grindstone is very large, and it is extremely disadvantageous economically, so it cannot be said that it is preferable. In grinding wheels with such a soft bonding degree, the bonding force that supports the abrasive grains weakens as the binder decreases, resulting in a sharp increase in grinding wheel wear.As a countermeasure, it is necessary to maintain the soft bonding degree. However, as the amount of binder increases, artificial porosity agents such as organic particles are sometimes added to prevent the degree of bonding from becoming hard. (For example, Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 161269/1983). In this case, the size of the artificial porosity agent must be smaller than the diameter of the abrasive grains in order to maintain the fine and uniform structure unique to the abrasive grains and binder in fine-grained abrasive wheels used in superfinishing processes. Or, since the equivalent level of fine grains are applied, the surface of the product grindstone is smooth and dense, and the fine pores peculiar to porous grindstones cannot be observed with the naked eye. In other words, since no essential improvements have been made to the intrinsic structure of the grinding wheel, increasing the amount of bonding agent within a range that does not make the bonding degree of the grinding wheel hard will improve the wear resistance of the grinding wheel somewhat, but the effect will not be significant. I can't say that there is. In addition, when using a large amount of fine pore agent, the cross section of the grinding wheel becomes apparently dense before firing, making it more likely to crack, and even during firing, cracks can occur due to the reduction of the abrasive grains as aggregate. This may cause deformation, etc. [Problems to be solved by the invention] As described above, with the conventional technology, it is not possible to obtain a porous superfinishing grindstone with excellent wear resistance without impairing cutting performance during superfinishing. There was a problem. [Means for Solving the Problems] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention uses hard abrasive grains such as aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, etc. Organic particles consisting of large particles with a particle size of ~50 times the particle size and small particle particles with a particle size of 1.5 to 10 times the abrasive particle size are further blended with vitrified bond, molded and fired. This method uses a porous superfinishing grindstone. The details will be described below. First, the particle size of the hard abrasive grains used in this invention is not particularly limited to a range, but in accordance with the above-mentioned Japanese Industrial Standards, it ranges from #800 (approximately 20 μm) to #3000.
(approximately 5 μm) is most commonly used.
Therefore, in order not to destroy the dense structure inherent in ordinary superfinishing wheels that use hard abrasive grains, the size of the pore agent particles must be 20 μm in average diameter.
The following fine particles are preferred. However, when a large amount of microporous agent is used, as mentioned above, the cross section of the whetstone becomes apparently dense before firing, making it easy to crack, and even during firing, the proportion of abrasive grains as aggregate decreases. This makes them more susceptible to cracking or deformation. On the other hand, when using large particles 20 to 50 times the abrasive grain size alone as a porosity agent,
Large particles, unlike small particles, play a sufficient role as aggregates, so they tend to cause defects such as cracks and deformation not only when they are present in large quantities, but also during manufacturing. When the amount is small, the dispersion within the grinding wheel becomes uneven, making it difficult to achieve a homogeneous pore distribution, which is not preferable. Therefore, in this invention, the particle size of the small-sized particles is set to 50 μm or more in average diameter ( 1.5 to 10 times the abrasive grain diameter) is preferable,
In addition, in order to uniformly disperse relatively large pores with a uniform shape in the grinding wheel, and to make them dotted with the grinding wheel action, large particles must have an average diameter of 100 to 500 μm (the diameter of the abrasive grains).
20 to 50 times) is preferable, and since the shape of the pores is uniform, it can be said that it is preferable that the ratio of the major axis and the minor axis or the diameter and height be close to 1, since the shape of the pores is uniform. In the present invention, large particles having a particle diameter of 20 to 50 times the abrasive grain size and small particle particles having a particle diameter of 1.5 to 10 times the abrasive grain diameter are mixed. The most preferable mixing ratio is 1 large particle size particle and 1 part large particle size particle.
2 to 5 parts by volume of small particle size particles per part by volume. Here, if the large grain size particles are small, less than 20 times the abrasive grain size, it is difficult to easily soften the degree of bonding with the grinding wheel, resulting in poor machinability, whereas if the large grain size is more than 50 times the abrasive grain diameter, This is because the particle size is undesirable because it tends to cause cracks, deformation, etc. during the production of the grindstone, and the structure of the grindstone becomes a coarse mesh-like discontinuous structure, which increases the amount of wear of the grindstone. In addition, if the small particle size is less than 1.5 times the abrasive grain size, it will have a dense structure unique to the grinding wheel, and will not be effective as a porous grinding wheel base.
In addition, when the particle size is more than 10 times larger, the formation of large-sized pores increases as they approach the pores of coarse particle sizes.
As a result, the amount of wear on the grinding wheel increases, resulting in the same result as the porous grinding wheel made of only large-sized particles as described above, and the effect is reduced, which is not preferable. moreover,
In the mixing ratio of large-sized particles and small-sized particles of the present invention, if the latter is in a small amount of less than 2 parts by volume, the base of the grinding wheel becomes dense, cutting performance decreases, and clogging or crushing occurs. On the other hand, if the amount exceeds 5 parts by volume, the amount of wear on the grinding wheel will increase.
The effect of adding it decreases, which is not preferable. In this invention, organic particles having the above-mentioned particle size distribution are used as a pore agent. Generally, porosity agents are burned away when a shaped whetstone is fired, forming pores within the whetstone structure, so the organic particles in this invention include, for example, styrene resin, acrylic resin, polyester resin, and modified polyphenylene. It is preferable to use a substance that can be completely burned out, such as oxide or epoxy resin. Furthermore, the vitrified bond used in this invention is commonly used and is not particularly limited. [Function] In this invention, the porous structure formed by the large-sized particles can be used without reducing the abrasive grain volume ratio, compared to the dense structure inherent in the grinding wheel, which has a small amount of wear and has high wear resistance. A soft bond can be easily obtained, and it exhibits the effect of imparting excellent cutting performance without impairing the wear resistance of the grinding wheel. In addition, in this invention, the porous structure formed on the grinding wheel base by small-sized particles is cut into relatively large-sized pores scattered on the working surface of the grinding wheel formed by large-sized particles. This prevents debris from accumulating and allows uniform discharge of cutting debris over the entire working surface of the grinding wheel.
Good cutting action can be maintained with an extremely small amount of grindstone wear. [Example] Granular styrene resin with a particle size of 400 μm as a large particle size particle and a particle size of 65 μm as a small particle size particle was prepared, and the average particle size was Japanese Industrial Standard #1200 (13 μm).
White aluminum oxide (abbreviated as WA) abrasive grain 100
Large particle size particles 4.5 parts by weight as shown in the table
sample 1 in which 13.5 parts by volume and small particle size particles were blended, sample 2 in which 13.5 parts by volume of small particle size particles were blended with 100 parts by weight of WA abrasive grains and no large particle size particles were blended; Sample 3 was prepared in which no particulate steely resin was added. And the sample grindstone is

【表】 WA砥粒および粒状スチール樹脂のほかにビト
リフアイドボンド(WA砥粒100重量部に対し15
重量部)および30%濃度デキストリン液(5容量
部)を撹拌混合し、焼成の砥石で、砥粒、ボンド
および気孔の体積を砥石の体積で除した値(%)
が、それぞれ砥粒率において42.5%、ボンド率に
おいて7.5%、気孔率において50.0%となるよう
な生砥石の嵩比重を予め計算で求めておき、この
嵩比重を基準にして各配合割合および成形条件
(圧力)定め、角型砥石を成形した。その後得ら
れた生砥石を乾燥し、さらに電気炉によつて最高
温度1240℃で1時間保持後、合計所要時間が32時
間となる条件で焼成し、得られた砥石について硬
度(RH)、砥石摩耗量、切削量および仕上げ面
粗度を測定した。各測定方法はつぎのとおりであ
る。 硬度(RH): ロツクウエル硬度形において直径1/8インチ
の鋼球を使用し、荷重60Kgとしたときのダイア
ルBの指示数値によつた。なおマイナス(−)
の硬度は、長針が30のセツト点を過ぎ、さらに
0点を通過して停止する場合の軟硬度である。 砥石摩耗量、切削量および仕上げ面粗度: 超仕上げ盤(西部自動機器社製)で加工油
(鉱油90%、硫化脂肪油10%)を使用して軸受
鋼(SUJ2種、ロツクウエルCスケルで58/62)
の内筒外面(外径14.5mm、幅12mm)を砥石作用
面(円周方向の幅3mm、軸方向の幅11mm)を使
用してプランジカツト超仕上げをした。この時
の主な超仕上げ条件は、砥石振動数1400cpm、
砥石振幅2mm、加工物回転数406rpmで、砥粒
の正弦波運動軌跡の形状を与える最大傾斜角
25°とした。なお、加工物の前加工は研削によ
り面粗度1.0Sに統一し、超仕上げ加工時間は2
分間とし、各測定値は加工物試験数4個につい
ての平均値である。 表に示した結果から、粒状スチール樹脂の大粒
径粒子と小粒径粒子との両者を含む試料1(この
発明に基づくもの)の砥石摩耗量は、小粒径粒子
のみを含む試料2の1/4、粒状スチロール樹脂を
全く含まない試料3の約1/5ときわめて少なく、
しかも試料1の切削量は他の試料2および3と比
較して低下することなく、むしろ増加している。
また仕上げ面粗度についても試料1は小さい値を
示し、他の試料2および3よりも優れていること
が明らかである。 〔効果〕 以上述べたことから明らかなように、この発明
の多孔性超仕上げ砥石は、従来の砥石摩耗量を犠
牲にした切削量の増加または仕上げ面粗度の獲得
という通説を覆して、砥石摩耗量が約1/4〜1/5程
度に激減するほどに改善されても切削性は低下す
ることがなく、同時に仕上げ面粗度も向上すると
いう効果を現わすので、この発明の超仕上げ加工
に対する貢献はきわめて大きいと言うことが出来
る。
[Table] In addition to WA abrasive grains and granular steel resin, vitrified bond (15 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of WA abrasive grains)
(parts by weight) and 30% concentration dextrin liquid (5 parts by volume) are stirred and mixed, and the volume of the abrasive grains, bond, and pores is divided by the volume of the grindstone using a fired grindstone (%).
However, the bulk specific gravity of the raw grindstone is calculated in advance so that the abrasive grain ratio is 42.5%, the bond ratio is 7.5%, and the porosity is 50.0%, and each compounding ratio and molding are determined based on this bulk specific gravity. The conditions (pressure) were determined and a square grindstone was formed. After that, the obtained raw whetstone was dried, and after being kept in an electric furnace at a maximum temperature of 1240°C for 1 hour, it was fired under conditions such that the total time required was 32 hours. Amount of wear, amount of cutting, and finished surface roughness were measured. Each measurement method is as follows. Hardness (RH): Based on the value indicated on Dial B when using a Rockwell hardness type steel ball with a diameter of 1/8 inch and a load of 60 kg. In addition, minus (-)
The hardness is the soft hardness when the long hand passes the set point of 30, then passes the 0 point and stops. Grinding wheel wear amount, cutting amount, and finished surface roughness: Using processing oil (90% mineral oil, 10% sulfurized fatty oil) with a super finishing machine (manufactured by Seibu Jidoki Co., Ltd.), bearing steel (SUJ type 2, Rockwell C scale) was used. 58/62)
The outer surface of the inner cylinder (outer diameter 14.5 mm, width 12 mm) was plunge-cut superfinished using a grindstone working surface (circumferential width 3 mm, axial width 11 mm). The main superfinishing conditions at this time were: a grinding wheel frequency of 1400 cpm;
The maximum inclination angle that gives the shape of the sinusoidal motion trajectory of the abrasive grains at a grinding wheel amplitude of 2 mm and a workpiece rotation speed of 406 rpm.
It was set to 25°. In addition, the pre-processing of the workpiece was ground to a surface roughness of 1.0S, and the super-finishing time was 2.
Each measured value is the average value for four test pieces. From the results shown in the table, it can be seen that the grinding wheel wear amount of Sample 1 (based on this invention) containing both large and small particles of granular steel resin is lower than that of Sample 2 containing only small particles. 1/4, and about 1/5 of Sample 3, which does not contain any granular styrene resin, which is extremely low.
Moreover, the cutting amount of sample 1 did not decrease compared to other samples 2 and 3, but rather increased.
In addition, Sample 1 showed a small value in terms of finished surface roughness, and was clearly superior to Samples 2 and 3. [Effects] As is clear from the above, the porous superfinishing grindstone of the present invention overturns the conventional wisdom that the amount of cutting is increased or the finished surface roughness is obtained at the expense of the amount of wear of the grinding wheel, and Even if the amount of wear is drastically reduced to about 1/4 to 1/5, the machinability does not deteriorate, and at the same time, the finished surface roughness also improves. It can be said that the contribution to processing is extremely large.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】 1 酸化アルミニウム質、炭化珪素質またはダイ
ヤモンド、立方晶窒化ホウ素等の硬質砥粒と、こ
の砥粒径の20〜50倍の粒子径を有する大粒径粒子
および砥粒径の1.5〜10倍の粒子径を有する小粒
径粒子からなる有機性粒子と、さらにビトリフア
イドボンドを配合し、成形および焼成したことを
特徴とする多孔性超仕上げ砥石。 2 有機性粒子中の小粒径粒子の配合量(容量)
が大粒径粒子の配合量(容量)の2〜5倍である
特許請求の範囲第1項記載の多孔性超仕上げ砥
石。
[Scope of Claims] 1. Hard abrasive grains such as aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, diamond, cubic boron nitride, etc., and large particles and abrasive grains having a particle size 20 to 50 times the abrasive grain size. 1. A porous superfinishing whetstone characterized by blending organic particles consisting of small-sized particles having a particle size 1.5 to 10 times larger than the average particle diameter, and further containing vitrified bond, molded and fired. 2. Amount (capacity) of small particle size particles in organic particles
The porous superfinishing grindstone according to claim 1, wherein the amount of the large-sized particles is 2 to 5 times the amount (capacity) of the large-sized particles.
JP16055587A 1987-06-25 1987-06-25 Porous super finishing grindstone Granted JPS642870A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16055587A JPS642870A (en) 1987-06-25 1987-06-25 Porous super finishing grindstone

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP16055587A JPS642870A (en) 1987-06-25 1987-06-25 Porous super finishing grindstone

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH012870A JPH012870A (en) 1989-01-06
JPS642870A JPS642870A (en) 1989-01-06
JPH05185B2 true JPH05185B2 (en) 1993-01-05

Family

ID=15717523

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP16055587A Granted JPS642870A (en) 1987-06-25 1987-06-25 Porous super finishing grindstone

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS642870A (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH04223878A (en) * 1990-12-26 1992-08-13 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Grindwheel for grinding lens and manufacture thereof
US5536282A (en) * 1994-11-08 1996-07-16 Cincinnati Milacron Inc. Method for producing an improved vitreous bonded abrasive article and the article produced thereby
JP2008105150A (en) * 2006-10-26 2008-05-08 Noritake Co Ltd Grinding wheel for mirror surface finishing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS642870A (en) 1989-01-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2017170554A (en) Vitrified grindstone for low pressure lapping for lapping machine and polishing method using the same
JPH0411331B2 (en)
JP2002331461A (en) Grinding stone for super-finishing
JPS63256364A (en) Porous grindstone of super abrasive grain
JP2004268200A (en) Composite resinoid grinding tool
JP2011140097A (en) Grindstone
JP2003136410A (en) Super abrasive vitrified bond whetstone
JPH0615572A (en) Grinding wheel
JPH012870A (en) Porous super finishing grinding wheel
JPH03184771A (en) Porous vitrified grinding wheel and manufacture thereof
JPH0857768A (en) Vitrified bond grindstone for heavy grinding
JP3203311B2 (en) Whetstone and its manufacturing method
JP4869695B2 (en) Vitrified grinding wheel manufacturing method
JPH0669669B2 (en) Super Abrasive Grain
JP2003321270A (en) Alumina ceramics superior in wearing resistance and corrosion resistance and method for manufacturing its molding
JPS63256365A (en) Porous grindstone
JP4854132B2 (en) Super finishing whetstone
JPH0985627A (en) Grinding wheel
JP2975033B2 (en) Vitrified super abrasive whetstone
JPH03287380A (en) Manufacture of porous vitrified grindstone
JPS6257874A (en) Super abrasive grain grindstone
JP2000158347A (en) Super-abrasive grain grinding wheel using heat-treated abrasive grains and manufacture thereof
JP2003071723A (en) Vitrified grinding wheel
JP3209976B2 (en) Super finishing whetstone
JPH08155840A (en) Cohered abrasive grain grinding wheel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees