JPH0565276B2 - - Google Patents

Info

Publication number
JPH0565276B2
JPH0565276B2 JP1804186A JP1804186A JPH0565276B2 JP H0565276 B2 JPH0565276 B2 JP H0565276B2 JP 1804186 A JP1804186 A JP 1804186A JP 1804186 A JP1804186 A JP 1804186A JP H0565276 B2 JPH0565276 B2 JP H0565276B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
welding
flux
bead
less
slag
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP1804186A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPS62179894A (en
Inventor
Isao Sugioka
Osami Shimoyama
Masami Yamaguchi
Hajime Motosugi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel Corp
Priority to JP1804186A priority Critical patent/JPS62179894A/en
Publication of JPS62179894A publication Critical patent/JPS62179894A/en
Publication of JPH0565276B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0565276B2/ja
Granted legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Nonmetallic Welding Materials (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】[Detailed description of the invention]

(産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、傾斜した溶接線を高速で溶接する、
スパイラル鋼管の造管溶接等に用いられるが、特
に板厚が9〜14mm程度の比較的薄鋼板の造管溶接
に用いて、一層の高速溶接化が可能となる潜弧溶
接用溶融型フラツクスに関する。 (従来の技術) スパイラル鋼管の造管溶接では、溶接速度の向
上が、即ち、生産性の向上となるため、従来から
溶接速度の向上が計られているが、特に薄鋼板を
用いる造管溶接では、単位時間(月)あたりの造
管量(ton)を比較すると、厚鋼板の造管より一
層の高速溶接化を計る必要がある。 しかし、従来、この造管溶接用フラツクスとし
て提案されたものは、比較的厚板を対象としたも
のが多い。すなわち、特開昭50−75143号公報に
は、溶接型フラツクス成分のTiO2をZrO2に置換
して、スラグ粘性を増すフラツクスが提案され、
さらに、特開昭55−40029号公報には、成分、か
さ密度を特定とし、スラグ層厚を薄く、スラグ粘
度を大きくすることによつて、湯流れを防止し、
過大なコンケーブ形状となるビードを改善する溶
融型フラツクスが提案されているが、いずれも、
溶接速度は2.5m/min程度を対象としている。
さらに、現状の厚板の造管溶接では深い溶け込み
を要するため開先を要し、開先を満たす溶着金属
量が必要なため、溶接入熱が大きく、溶融金属が
湯流れを起しやすく、上述のフラツクスは効果が
大きいものである。 しかし、板厚が8〜14mmの比較的薄鋼板を用い
る造管溶接では、生産性を向上させるため、3.5
m/minの溶接速度が要望されている。 この薄板を用いる造管では、溶接速度の上昇に
伴つて、電流を上げることは溶接時にアークが鋼
板を突き抜け、メタルが落下する、溶け落ちを起
すことになるため、溶接入熱(電流×電圧×60÷
溶接速度)を小さくせざるを得ない。その結果、
上述のスラグ粘性を増したフラツクスや、スラグ
層厚を薄くしたフラツクスでは、ポツクマークや
アンダカツトが発生し、3.5m/minの溶接速度
では使用できず、新たな成分のフラツクスを開発
する必要があつた。 (発明が解決しようとする問題点) 本発明は、先に述べた如く、従来のフラツクス
を用いては、ポツクマーク、アンダカツト等、溶
接欠陥の発生によつて使用できなかつた板厚8〜
14mm、溶接速度3.5m/minスパイラル造管溶接
を可能とし、さらに、スラグ剥離性能、ビード外
観が良好な、潜弧溶接用溶融型フラツクスを提供
しようとするものである。 (問題点を解決するための手段) 本発明者らは、従来から有る溶融型フラツクス
で、現状では傾斜溶接に用いられていないが、平
面上を高速溶接して、ピード外観、スラグ剥離性
等の溶接作業性能が極めて優れている溶融型フラ
ツクスが、スラグ粘性が低く、アンダーカツト、
ポツクマーク等の欠陥発生防止に効果があると考
えた。 そこで従来、平面上の高速溶接用に用いられて
いる、第1表に示す主要成分系がSiO2−TiO2
Al2O3系フラツクスとSiO2−MnO系フラツクス
を用い、スパイラル鋼管の造管溶接への適用溶接
試験を行なつた。 この試験方法は、第2図aに示すように、板厚
12mm、内径/m、長さ1.5mの第2表に示す成分
の鋼管1内面に、第2表に示すワイヤを用い、先
行電極2(DC.RP.1100A、27V)と後行電極3
(A.700A、31V)でタンデム潜弧溶接ビードを、
パイプの長手方向に対し45゜の角度でスパイラル
状に置く方法で行つた。 また、溶接速度sの設定は、パイプの回転速度
rと移動速度vを第2図bに示す関係に従い同調
させて変更することによつて、行なつた。さら
に、先行電極2の位置は、パイプ内面の最底線よ
り、下り坂傾斜方向に20mm移動した場所とした。
(以下、オフセンター:下り坂20mm、又はOC〜:下
り坂20と言う。) この溶接試験では、溶接速度3.5m/minで行
つた結果は、第1表の最右欄のビード断面形状に
示す通りであり、いずれも、3.5m/minで用い
ることは不可能であつた。しかし、SiO2−TiO2
−Al2O3系従来フラツクスでは溶接速度を2.5m/
minとするか、あるいは、オフセンター:下り坂
120mmとした場合、第3図aのような、著しい扁
平ビードのコンケーブ形状となり、オーバーラツ
プが発生した。そこで、溶接速度、オフセンター
を種々に変更して、溶接試験を行つた結果、溶接
速度3.0m/min、OC〜:下り坂70mmで形状が最良
と考えられる溶接条件が得られたが、そのビード
断面形状は第3図c示す如く、コンケーブ形状
で、オーバーラツプとアンダーカツトが同時に発
生する非常に不安定な形状で、溶接条件のわずか
な変動によつて形状が大きく変化し、実際の造管
に用いることが不可能であつた。 しかし、第4図に示すビード立上り角度α、
β、あるいは、ビード外観面の平滑性等は非常に
良好であつた。又、第1表に示すSiO2−MnO系
フラツクスでは、同様に試験条件を変えて実験を
行つた結果、溶接速度を4.0m/minとするか、
あるいは、OC〜:上り坂、30mmでは、第3図cの
ようなビードとなるが、良好な条件範囲では同様
に狭く、実際の造管に用いることは不適当と考え
られ、さらに、ビード立上り角度は、比較的大
で、ビード外観面はやや劣つた。 これらの実験結果から本発明者らは、溶接速度
の変化によつて、溶接入熱量が変化し、さらに、
スラグ粘性は、スラグ温度の変化によつて変わる
ものであること、また、そもそも、フラツクスの
溶融温度が異なる場合、1400℃以上の一定温度で
測定したスラグ粘性は、溶接入熱量が低い場合、
大きな意味を持たず、軟化温度、溶融温度とその
温度差が昇温時間一定にした場合、ビード形成に
最も影響を与えると考えた。そこで、従来のフラ
ツクスについて、軟化溶融温度を測定した。 この方法は、第1図bに示す如く、フラツクス
試料を常温で縦断面を正方形とし、炉内で昇温
し、上角部が丸く溶融し始めた温度を軟化温度と
し、試料高さが常温時の1/2になつた時の温度を
溶融温度とするものである。 この測定を行なつた結果、第1図aに示すよう
に、従来のSiO2−TiO2−Al2O3系フラツクスは、
軟化温度が1330℃で溶融温度が1350℃であり、従
来のSiO2−MnO系フラツクスの1130℃、1180℃
に比べ高温であり、しかも、急激に粘性が低下す
る傾向を示した。 そこで、フラツクスの溶融温度は1180℃を越
え、1350℃未満のフラツクスであれば、先に述べ
たパイプ内面での実験結果から良好なビードが得
られると考え、種々の成分を変えたフラツクスを
試作し、フラツクス溶融温度の測定と溶融試験を
行なつた。その結果、溶接速度3.5m/minでパ
イプ内面の溶接を行なつて、溶接欠陥が発生せ
ず、スラグ剥離性、ビード外観が良好なフラツク
スが得られた。 本発明は以上の知見によつてなされたものであ
り、その要旨とするところは、成分が重量%で
SiO2:15〜30%、Al2O3:15〜30%、TiO2:5
〜18%、MnO:10〜25%、BaO:6〜30%、
CaF2:7〜15%であることを必須とし、その他
の成分として、CaOが8%以下、MgOが3%以
下、酸化鉄がFeOとして4%以下、Na2O+K2O
が3%以下であることを特徴とする潜弧溶接用溶
融型フラツクスにある。 以下に本発明フラツクスの成分限定の理由を作
用と共に述べる。 (作用) SiO2を15〜30%とすること: SiO2成分は、スラグ生成剤であつて、15%に
満たない場合、スラグ層が薄くなり、アンダカツ
ト、ポツクマークなどの溶接欠陥が発生する。ま
た、30%を越えた場合、スラグ層が厚くなり過ぎ
る結果、湯流れを起し、オーバーラツプが発生す
る。 Al2O3を15〜30%とすること: Al2O3成分は、フラツクス溶融温度を調整する
成分であつて、15%に満たない場合、フラツクス
溶融温度が低くなり過ぎる結果、高速溶接では湯
流れを起し、ビード断面形状がコンケーブとな
り、30%を越えた場合、フラツクス溶融温度が高
くなり過ぎる結果、ビード断面形状が凸形とな
り、アンダーカツトが発生する。 TiO2を5〜18%とすること: TiO2成分は、アーク強さを調整する成分であ
つて、5%に満たない場合、アーク強さが弱く、
長くなり過ぎる結果、フラツクス溶融量が増加
し、スラグ量が増加する結果、湯流れを起し、18
%を越えた場合、アーク強さが強くなり過ぎる結
果、溶け込み深さが増し、溶け込み埋めきれず
に、アンダーカツトが発生する。 MnOを10〜25%とすること: MnOは、SiO2と共にスラグ生成剤であり、さ
らにアーク安定剤であつて、25%を越えた場合、
高速溶接では、ビードが蛇行し、10%に満たない
量では、その効果が不足して、アーク不安定とな
る。 BaOを6〜30%とすること: BaO成分は、スラグ粘性を調整し、スラグ剥
離性の改善に効果がある。しかし、6%に満たな
い場合、スラグ剥離性の効果は不足で、30%を越
えた場合、ビード表面が醜くなる。 CaF2を7〜15%とすること: CaF2成分はポツクマーク発生を防止するガス
発生成分であつて、7%に満たない場合、耐ポツ
クマーク性能が不足し、15%を越えた場合、スラ
グがビード表面に焼付き、ハクリ性が悪化する。 以上が必須の成分であつて、その他の成分は、
少ない方が良いが原材料鉱石中に不純物として含
まれており、過剰に残渣としてフラツクス中に含
まれると、悪影響を与えるものであつて、上限を
定めるものである。 CaOが8%以下であること: CaO成分は、溶融型フラツクスでは、溶融炉中
でCaF2が分解してCaO成分として存在するもの
と、その他の原材料鉱石中の不純物がフラツクス
中に存在するものの合計を言う場合もあるが、本
発明ではフラツクス中のF成分を本来のCaF2
分とし計算し、その他のCaOを8%以下とするも
のであつて、8%を越えた場合、ポツクマークや
ヘリンボーン等が発生するため、8%以下とし
た。 MgOを3%以下とすること: MgO成分は、高温溶融、耐火性成分であつて、
フラツクス溶融温度を上昇させる成分である。そ
のため、3%を越えた場合、ビード断面形状を凸
形とし、アンダカツトが発生するため、3%以下
とした。 酸化鉄がFeOとして4%以下であること: 酸化鉄は、原料鉱石中に不純物として含まれ、
フラツクス中でもFe2O、FeO、Fe2O3、等の酸化
鉄として含まれている。従つて、FeOに換算して
4%以下なら特に問題はないが、4%を越えて故
意に添加した場合、ビード立上り角度が大きくな
り、かつコンケーブ深さが深くなると共にビード
中央にシワ状の収縮線が発生し、外観を悪化する
ため、FeOとして4%以下とした。 Na2O+K2Oが3%以下であること: Na2OやK2O成分はいずれも、スラグ粘性を極
端に低下させ、3%を越えて含まれると、湯流れ
を起こしビード断面形状が扁平なコンケーブ形状
でオーバーラツプになるため、Na2O+K2で3%
以下とした。 なお、フラツクスの粒度構成やかさ密度等は、
特に制限するものではないが、粒度構成は従来、
比較的粗粒を多く含むフラツクスが用いられてお
り、本発明フラツクスにおいても、JIS.Z8801規
格の網ふるいを用い、呼び寸法2.80mmを通過し、
106μmを通過しない粒子をフラツクス全体の90
重量%以上とすることが望ましい。又、かさ密度
は、平面上を1.5〜2.5m/min程度の溶接速度で
溶接する場合は、発泡粒を多く含む1.5g/cm3
下の軽質フラツクスが良いが、3.0m/min以上
の高速溶接に用いる場合、発泡粒中のガスが悪影
響を及ぼすため、本発明フラツクスでは、JIS
K6721規格に準じて測定し、発泡粒を含まず、
1.6g/cm3以上のかさ密度であることが望ましい。 以下に本発明の実例を述べる。 (実施例) 第2法に示す成分の鋼管、潜弧溶接用ワイヤを
用いて、第3表の溶接条件で、第2図に示す要領
で、ビード置き試験を行なつた、試験に用いた試
作フラツクスは第4表に示し、フラツクスの試作
は、原材料鉱石を目標成分になるように配合、混
合し、溶融炉で溶融した後、鋼板上あるいは、回
転ドラムの間隙で冷却し、1000℃以下の低温で水
砕、乾燥、整粒して試作したものである。 この溶接試験の結果は、第5表に示す如く、本
発明のフラツクスでは、いずれも、ビード断面形
状は良好で、スラグ剥離性も良好であり、溶接欠
陥の発生もなかつた。しかし、比較フラツクスH
では、その成分が本発明品に比べ、SiO2、MnO
が過少で、Al2O3、TiO2が過多なため、フラツク
ス溶融温度は1340℃と若干低下したが、ビード形
状は凸形となり、アンダカツトが発生しスラグ剥
離が悪かつた。また、比較フラツクスIは、本発
明品に比べ、その成分のSiO2、MnOが過多で、
Al2O3、TiO2が過少なため、フラツクス溶融温度
が1190℃であつたが、ビード形状は偏平なコンケ
ーブ形状で、ビード両端にオーバーラツプが発生
し、スラグ剥離性能が悪かつた。 比較スラツクスJはその成分のCaF2、Na2O+
K2Oが過多で、フラツクス溶融温度が1130℃と著
しく低下したことによつて、ビード形状は、さら
に偏平なコンケーブ形状となり、オーバーラツプ
が大きくスラグがオーバーラツプ部にかみ込みを
起し、剥離性が悪かつた。 比較フラツクスKは、MnO成分が過多で、
BaO成分が過少なため、アークが不安定となり、
ビードが蛇行し、一部アンダカツトの発生によ
り、スラグ剥離性が悪かつた。 比較フラツクスLは、BaO、CaO成分が過多
なため、ビード形状、スラグ剥離性は、ほぼ良好
であつたが、ビード外観が醜く、ポツクマークが
多発した。 比較フラツクスMは、その成分のCaF2が過少
で、MgOが過多なため、フラツクス溶融温度が
1370℃と高過ぎる結果、ビード形状が凸形とな
り、ビード両端の全線にアンダカツトが発生し、
スラグをかみ込む結果、剥離性が悪かつた。 比較フラツクスNは、FlO成分を添加して、過
多としたフラツクスで、その結果、ビード形状
は、立上り角度、コンケーブ深さが大きく、スラ
グ剥離性が悪く、さらにビード中央にシワ状の収
縮線が発生して、外観が悪化した。 なお、ビード断面形状の判定は、第4図に示す
如く、コンケーブ深さ()は1mm未満を良好と
し、1mm以上をコンケーブ大とした。また、ビー
ド立上り角度は、ビード両端の立上り角度α、
β、の平均角度とし、90゜未満を良好、90゜以上を
不良とした。
(Industrial Application Field) The present invention is directed to welding an inclined welding line at high speed.
This invention relates to a melt-type flux for submerged arc welding, which is used in the manufacture and welding of spiral steel pipes, and in particular is used in the manufacture and welding of relatively thin steel plates with a thickness of about 9 to 14 mm, enabling even higher speed welding. . (Conventional technology) In pipe manufacturing welding of spiral steel pipes, improvements in welding speed have traditionally improved productivity. Now, if we compare the amount of pipes produced (tons) per unit time (month), we need to weld even faster than pipes made of thick steel plates. However, most of the fluxes that have been proposed so far for pipe making and welding are intended for relatively thick plates. That is, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 75143/1983 proposes a flux in which TiO 2 in the welding flux component is replaced with ZrO 2 to increase slag viscosity.
Furthermore, Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 55-40029 discloses that the components and bulk density are specified, the slag layer thickness is thinned, and the slag viscosity is increased to prevent melt flow.
Melting type fluxes have been proposed to improve beads that have an excessively concave shape, but none of them
The welding speed is approximately 2.5m/min.
Furthermore, current welding for making thick plates requires deep penetration, which requires a groove, and the amount of deposited metal needed to fill the groove, which results in a large welding heat input and the molten metal tends to flow. The above-mentioned fluxes are highly effective. However, in pipe making welding using relatively thin steel plates with a thickness of 8 to 14 mm, in order to improve productivity, 3.5 mm
A welding speed of m/min is required. In pipe manufacturing using thin plates, increasing the current as the welding speed increases will cause the arc to penetrate the steel plate during welding, causing metal to fall or burn through. ×60÷
(welding speed) must be reduced. the result,
The aforementioned fluxes with increased slag viscosity and fluxes with thinner slag layer thickness caused spot marks and undercuts, and could not be used at a welding speed of 3.5 m/min, so it was necessary to develop a flux with a new composition. . (Problems to be Solved by the Invention) As mentioned above, the present invention solves the problem of the plate thickness 8 to 8, which cannot be used due to the occurrence of welding defects such as pot marks and undercuts when using conventional flux.
The purpose is to provide a melt-type flux for submerged arc welding that enables spiral pipe welding of 14 mm and a welding speed of 3.5 m/min, and also has good slag removal performance and bead appearance. (Means for Solving the Problems) The present inventors have developed a method for high-speed welding on flat surfaces using a conventional fused flux, which is not currently used for inclined welding. The molten flux has extremely excellent welding performance, has low slag viscosity, and is suitable for undercuts and welding.
It was thought that this would be effective in preventing defects such as pot marks. Therefore, the main component system shown in Table 1, which has been conventionally used for high-speed welding on flat surfaces, is SiO 2 −TiO 2
A welding test was conducted using Al 2 O 3 based flux and SiO 2 -MnO based flux for welding spiral steel pipes. This test method, as shown in Figure 2a,
Using the wire shown in Table 2 on the inner surface of the steel pipe 1 of 12 mm, inner diameter/m, and length 1.5 m, with the components shown in Table 2, a leading electrode 2 (DC.RP.1100A, 27V) and a trailing electrode 3 were attached.
(A.700A, 31V) tandem submerged arc welding bead,
This was done by placing the pipe in a spiral shape at an angle of 45° to the longitudinal direction. Further, the welding speed s was set by synchronizing and changing the rotational speed r and the moving speed v of the pipe according to the relationship shown in FIG. 2b. Further, the position of the leading electrode 2 was moved 20 mm in the downhill direction from the bottom line of the inner surface of the pipe.
(Hereinafter, it will be referred to as off-center: downhill 20mm, or OC~: downhill 20mm.) In this welding test, the results were performed at a welding speed of 3.5 m/min, and the bead cross-sectional shape in the rightmost column of Table 1 As shown, it was impossible to use any of them at 3.5 m/min. However, SiO 2 −TiO 2
−For Al 2 O 3 based conventional flux, the welding speed was 2.5 m/
min or off center: downhill
When the diameter was 120 mm, the concave shape of the bead was extremely flat as shown in Figure 3a, and overlap occurred. Therefore, welding tests were conducted with various welding speeds and off-center settings, and welding conditions were obtained that were considered to have the best shape, with a welding speed of 3.0 m/min and an OC of 70 mm downhill. The cross-sectional shape of the bead is a concave shape, as shown in Figure 3c, and is a very unstable shape in which overlap and undercut occur at the same time, and the shape changes greatly due to slight variations in welding conditions, making it difficult to use in actual pipe manufacturing. It was impossible to use it for However, the bead rising angle α shown in FIG.
β or the smoothness of the bead external surface was very good. In addition, for the SiO 2 -MnO flux shown in Table 1, experiments were conducted with the same test conditions changed, and the results showed that the welding speed was 4.0 m/min,
Alternatively, at OC~: uphill, 30 mm, the bead will be as shown in Figure 3c, but under good conditions it will be similarly narrow and it is considered inappropriate to use it in actual pipe making, and furthermore, the bead will rise. The angle was relatively large and the bead appearance was somewhat poor. From these experimental results, the present inventors found that the amount of welding heat input changes as the welding speed changes, and furthermore,
Slag viscosity changes with changes in slag temperature, and in the first place, if the melting temperature of the flux is different, the slag viscosity measured at a constant temperature of 1400°C or higher will be different if the welding heat input is low.
It was thought that the softening temperature, melting temperature, and the temperature difference between them had the greatest influence on bead formation when the heating time was kept constant, without having any major significance. Therefore, the softening and melting temperatures of conventional fluxes were measured. In this method, as shown in Figure 1b, a flux sample is made into a square longitudinal section at room temperature, heated in a furnace, the temperature at which the upper corner begins to melt roundly is taken as the softening temperature, and the height of the sample is set at room temperature. The melting temperature is the temperature when the temperature reaches 1/2 of the time. As a result of this measurement, as shown in Figure 1a, the conventional SiO 2 -TiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 flux is
The softening temperature is 1330℃ and the melting temperature is 1350℃, compared to the conventional SiO 2 -MnO flux of 1130℃ and 1180℃.
In addition, the viscosity tended to decrease rapidly. Therefore, based on the experimental results on the inner surface of the pipe mentioned earlier, we believed that a flux with a melting temperature of over 1180℃ and below 1350℃ would produce a good bead, so we prototyped fluxes with various components. Then, the flux melting temperature was measured and a melting test was conducted. As a result, the inner surface of the pipe was welded at a welding speed of 3.5 m/min, and a flux with good slag removability and bead appearance without any welding defects was obtained. The present invention was made based on the above findings, and its gist is that the ingredients are expressed in weight%.
SiO2 : 15-30% , Al2O3 : 15-30%, TiO2 : 5
~18%, MnO: 10~25%, BaO: 6~30%,
CaF 2 : Must be 7 to 15%, other components include CaO 8% or less, MgO 3% or less, iron oxide 4% or less as FeO, Na 2 O + K 2 O
3% or less. The reasons for limiting the components of the flux of the present invention will be described below along with their effects. (Function) Setting the SiO 2 content to 15 to 30%: The SiO 2 component is a slag forming agent, and if it is less than 15%, the slag layer becomes thin and welding defects such as undercuts and pot marks occur. Furthermore, if it exceeds 30%, the slag layer becomes too thick, causing flow and overlapping. Al 2 O 3 should be 15 to 30%: The Al 2 O 3 component is a component that adjusts the flux melting temperature, and if it is less than 15%, the flux melting temperature will become too low, making it difficult to perform high-speed welding. Molten metal flows and the cross-sectional shape of the bead becomes concave, and if it exceeds 30%, the flux melting temperature becomes too high, resulting in the cross-sectional shape of the bead becoming convex and undercutting. TiO 2 should be 5 to 18%: TiO 2 is a component that adjusts the arc strength, and if it is less than 5%, the arc strength will be weak.
As a result of being too long, the amount of flux melting increases and the amount of slag increases, causing molten metal flow.
If it exceeds %, the arc strength becomes too strong, the penetration depth increases, and undercuts occur because the penetration is not completely filled. MnO should be 10-25%: MnO is a slag forming agent along with SiO 2 and is also an arc stabilizer, and if it exceeds 25%,
In high-speed welding, the bead meanderes, and if the amount is less than 10%, the effect is insufficient and the arc becomes unstable. Setting BaO to 6 to 30%: The BaO component is effective in adjusting slag viscosity and improving slag removability. However, if it is less than 6%, the slag removability effect is insufficient, and if it exceeds 30%, the bead surface becomes ugly. The CaF2 content should be between 7% and 15%: The CaF2 component is a gas-generating component that prevents the occurrence of pockmarks.If it is less than 7%, the anti-pockmark performance will be insufficient, and if it exceeds 15%, it will cause slag. Seizes on the bead surface and deteriorates peelability. The above are essential ingredients, other ingredients are:
Although it is better to have less amount, it is contained as an impurity in the raw material ore, and if it is contained excessively in the flux as a residue, it has an adverse effect, and an upper limit is set. CaO content must be 8% or less: In a molten flux, the CaO component is composed of two components: CaF2 decomposed in the melting furnace and present as a CaO component, and impurities in other raw material ores present in the flux. Although sometimes referred to as the total, in the present invention, the F component in the flux is calculated as the original CaF 2 component, and other CaO is kept below 8%. etc., so it was set to 8% or less. MgO should be 3% or less: The MgO component is a high-temperature melting, fire-resistant component,
A component that increases the flux melting temperature. Therefore, if it exceeds 3%, the cross-sectional shape of the bead becomes convex and undercuts occur, so it was set to 3% or less. Iron oxide is less than 4% as FeO: Iron oxide is contained as an impurity in the raw ore,
It is also contained in flux as iron oxides such as Fe 2 O, FeO, and Fe 2 O 3 . Therefore, there is no particular problem if it is less than 4% in terms of FeO, but if it is intentionally added in excess of 4%, the bead rise angle becomes large, the concave depth becomes deep, and wrinkles appear in the center of the bead. Since shrinkage lines occur and the appearance deteriorates, the FeO content was set to 4% or less. Na 2 O + K 2 O must be 3% or less: Both Na 2 O and K 2 O components extremely reduce slag viscosity, and if they are contained in excess of 3%, they cause melt flow and the bead cross-sectional shape. Because it has a flat concave shape and overlaps, 3% Na 2 O + K 2
The following was made. The particle size structure and bulk density of the flux are as follows:
Although not particularly limited, the particle size structure has traditionally been
A flux containing a relatively large amount of coarse particles is used, and the flux of the present invention also passes through a nominal size of 2.80 mm using a JIS.Z8801 standard mesh sieve.
Particles that do not pass through 106μm are 90% of the total flux.
It is desirable that the amount is at least % by weight. Regarding the bulk density, when welding on a flat surface at a welding speed of about 1.5 to 2.5 m/min, a light flux of 1.5 g/cm 3 or less containing many foam particles is good, but when welding at a high speed of 3.0 m/min or more, When used for welding, the gas in the foamed particles has an adverse effect, so the flux of the present invention complies with JIS
Measured according to K6721 standard, does not contain foam particles,
It is desirable that the bulk density is 1.6 g/cm 3 or more. Examples of the present invention will be described below. (Example) A bead placement test was conducted using steel pipes and submerged arc welding wires with the components shown in Method 2, under the welding conditions shown in Table 3, and in the manner shown in Figure 2. The prototype flux is shown in Table 4.The prototype flux is made by blending and mixing the raw material ores to the target composition, melting it in a melting furnace, and then cooling it on a steel plate or in the gap of a rotating drum to a temperature below 1000℃. This prototype was made by crushing, drying, and sizing at low temperatures. The results of this welding test are as shown in Table 5, with all fluxes of the present invention, the bead cross-sectional shape was good, the slag removability was good, and no welding defects occurred. However, the comparative flux H
In this case, compared to the product of the present invention, its components are less SiO 2 , MnO
Because the amount of Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 was too low, the flux melting temperature was slightly lowered to 1340°C, but the bead shape was convex, undercuts occurred, and slag peeling was poor. In addition, compared to the product of the present invention, comparative flux I contains excessive amounts of SiO 2 and MnO,
Due to the insufficient amount of Al 2 O 3 and TiO 2 , the flux melting temperature was 1190°C, but the bead shape was a flat concave shape, overlap occurred at both ends of the bead, and the slag removal performance was poor. Comparative slacks J has its components CaF 2 , Na 2 O+
With too much K 2 O, the flux melting temperature dropped significantly to 1130°C, resulting in a bead shape that became even more flat and concave, and the overlap became large, causing slag to get caught in the overlap area, resulting in poor peelability. It was bad. Comparative flux K has too much MnO component,
Due to insufficient BaO content, the arc becomes unstable,
The bead meandered and some undercuts occurred, resulting in poor slag removal. Comparative flux L had an excessive amount of BaO and CaO components, so the bead shape and slag removability were almost good, but the bead appearance was ugly and there were many pockmarks. Comparative flux M has too little CaF 2 and too much MgO, so the flux melting temperature is low.
As a result of the temperature being too high (1370℃), the bead shape becomes convex and undercuts occur on all lines at both ends of the bead.
As a result of the slag being trapped, removability was poor. Comparative flux N is a flux in which an excessive amount of FlO is added, and as a result, the bead shape has a large rising angle and concave depth, poor slag removability, and a wrinkle-like shrinkage line in the center of the bead. It occurred and the appearance deteriorated. As shown in FIG. 4, the bead cross-sectional shape was judged as good if the concave depth () was less than 1 mm, and if it was 1 mm or more, the concave was large. Also, the bead rising angle is the rising angle α at both ends of the bead,
The average angle of β was defined as less than 90° as good and 90° or more as poor.

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】【table】

【表】 (発明の効果) 以上、詳細に説明したように、本発明フラツク
スを用いることによつて、溶接欠陥を発生させる
ことなく、溶接速度を3.5m/minの高速で溶接
が可能となることにより、板厚8〜14mmの比較的
薄鋼板の造管溶接の生産性の向上が計れ、その効
果は非常に大きい。
[Table] (Effects of the invention) As explained above in detail, by using the flux of the present invention, welding can be performed at a high welding speed of 3.5 m/min without causing welding defects. As a result, it is possible to improve the productivity of pipe manufacturing and welding of relatively thin steel plates with a thickness of 8 to 14 mm, and the effect is very large.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of drawings]

第1図aは、フラツクス軟化溶融温度測定結果
を示すグラフ、第1図bはフラツクス試料の各温
度での形状変化を示す図、第2図aは、溶接試験
方法を説明するための電極とパイプの配置図、第
2図bは溶接速度設定の説明図、第3図はビード
断面形状の概略説明図、第4図はその詳細な説明
図、第5図a,bは第1表の溶接結果の欄におけ
るビード断面形状を示す図、第6図a〜hは第5
表のビード断面形状の欄の各ビード断面形状を示
す図である。 1……鋼管、2……先行電極、3……後行電
極、O.C〜……オフセンター、r……鋼管の回転方
向と速度、v……鋼管の移動方向と速度、s……
溶接線方向と速度。
Figure 1a is a graph showing the measurement results of the flux softening and melting temperature, Figure 1b is a graph showing the change in shape of the flux sample at each temperature, and Figure 2a is a graph showing the results of the flux softening and melting temperature measurement. Pipe arrangement diagram, Figure 2b is an explanatory diagram of welding speed setting, Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the bead cross-sectional shape, Figure 4 is a detailed diagram thereof, and Figures 5a and b are in Table 1. Diagrams showing the bead cross-sectional shapes in the welding results column, Figures 6a to 6h are the 5th
It is a figure which shows each bead cross-sectional shape in the column of bead cross-sectional shape of a table|surface. 1... Steel pipe, 2... Leading electrode, 3... Trailing electrode, OC ~... Off center, r... Rotating direction and speed of steel pipe, v... Moving direction and speed of steel pipe, s...
Weld line direction and speed.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 1 成分が重量%で、SiO2:15〜30%、Al2O3
15〜30%、TiO2:5〜18%、MnO:10〜25%、
BaO:6〜30%、CaF2:7〜15%であることを
必須とし、その他の成分として、CaOが8%以
下、MgOが3%以下、酸化鉄がFeOとして4%
以下、Na2O+K2Oが3%以下であることを特徴
とする潜弧溶接用溶融型フラツクス。
1 Components are in weight%, SiO 2 : 15-30%, Al 2 O 3 :
15-30%, TiO2 : 5-18%, MnO: 10-25%,
BaO: 6 to 30%, CaF2 : 7 to 15% are essential, and other components include CaO of 8% or less, MgO of 3% or less, and iron oxide as FeO of 4%.
The following describes a melting type flux for submerged arc welding characterized by containing 3% or less of Na 2 O + K 2 O.
JP1804186A 1986-01-31 1986-01-31 Fused flux for submerged arc welding Granted JPS62179894A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1804186A JPS62179894A (en) 1986-01-31 1986-01-31 Fused flux for submerged arc welding

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP1804186A JPS62179894A (en) 1986-01-31 1986-01-31 Fused flux for submerged arc welding

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS62179894A JPS62179894A (en) 1987-08-07
JPH0565276B2 true JPH0565276B2 (en) 1993-09-17

Family

ID=11960595

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP1804186A Granted JPS62179894A (en) 1986-01-31 1986-01-31 Fused flux for submerged arc welding

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS62179894A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1997024203A1 (en) * 1995-12-28 1997-07-10 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Method of manufacturing large diameter welded steel pipe having high strength and toughness
KR100355580B1 (en) * 2000-08-17 2002-10-12 고려용접봉 주식회사 Agglomerated flux for submerged arc welding

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS62179894A (en) 1987-08-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4764224A (en) Baked flux for submerged arc welding
JP5632343B2 (en) Electroslag overlay welding flux
US3922519A (en) Method for a build-up welding of different metals
JPH0130597B2 (en)
US4436562A (en) Basic bonded fluxes for submerged arc welding having an excellent removability of slag at a narrow groove
US2150625A (en) Method of making flux for use in electric welding
JPS59137194A (en) Baked flux for high speed submerged arc welding
JPH0565276B2 (en)
US2191473A (en) Welding composition
JPS5944156B2 (en) Flux for overlay welding
EP4232232B1 (en) Welding flux composition and corresponding method for welding metals
JPS5841694A (en) Calcined flux for submerged arc welding
JP2907794B2 (en) Ceramic backing material for carbon dioxide arc welding
US2585568A (en) Electric cladding
KR100400412B1 (en) Server-Merged Arc Welding Flux Composition and Manufacturing Method
RU1648001C (en) Flux for automatic electric arc fusing on
JP3256113B2 (en) Backing material for automatic rail welding and its use
SU903044A1 (en) Welded seam back side backing composition
JPH0455790B2 (en)
JPH02200381A (en) Submerged arc welding method at high speed for spiral steel pipe
JPH08290271A (en) One-sided submerged arc welding method
JP3672148B2 (en) Fused backing flux for single-sided welding
JPS63264297A (en) Flux for non-fused submerged arc welding
JPS599276B2 (en) Melting type flux for submerged arc slope welding
JPS62238093A (en) Core wire for coated electrode