JPH0652268A - Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the same - Google Patents
Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the sameInfo
- Publication number
- JPH0652268A JPH0652268A JP4207954A JP20795492A JPH0652268A JP H0652268 A JPH0652268 A JP H0652268A JP 4207954 A JP4207954 A JP 4207954A JP 20795492 A JP20795492 A JP 20795492A JP H0652268 A JPH0652268 A JP H0652268A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- dimensional
- expression
- error
- inspection device
- analysis
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Abstract
(57)【要約】
【目的】解析所要時間を短縮化する。
【構成】面要素EPが立体要素ECの面と同一面になっ
ているかどうかを判断し、同一面と判断された面要素E
P及び立体要素ECを抽出し、抽出された面要素EPを
表す節点座標N1,N2,N3,N4の順番の方向が、
立体要素ECの該同一面を表す節点座標P1,P2,P
3,P4の順番の方向と逆方向であるかどうかを判断
し、逆方向と判断された場合には、該判断対象の面要素
EP又は立体要素ECの表現がエラーであることを出力
することにより、解析実行前に要素の表現の適否を自動
的にチェックする。
(57) [Summary] [Purpose] To shorten the analysis time. [Structure] It is judged whether or not the surface element EP is the same surface as the surface of the three-dimensional element EC, and the surface element E which is judged to be the same surface
P and the three-dimensional element EC are extracted, and the order directions of the nodal coordinates N1, N2, N3, and N4 representing the extracted surface element EP are
Nodal coordinates P1, P2, P representing the same plane of the three-dimensional element EC
It is determined whether or not the direction is the reverse direction of the order of 3, 4, and if it is determined to be the reverse direction, it is output that the expression of the surface element EP or the solid element EC of the determination target is an error. This automatically checks the adequacy of the expression of the element before executing the analysis.
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、有限要素法に基づいて
構造物を解析するためにこの構造物の幾何モデルを要素
(有限要素)に分割したときの該要素の表現を検査する
有限要素検査装置及びこれを用いた構造物解析方法に関
する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a finite element for inspecting a representation of a geometric model of a structure when the geometric model of the structure is divided into elements (finite elements) in order to analyze the structure based on the finite element method. The present invention relates to an inspection device and a structure analysis method using the inspection device.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】例えば図5(A)に示すような構造物の
応力解析等を行う場合について考える。この構造物の幾
何モデル10は、基台11の上面にこの上面よりも広い
天板12が固着されている。天板12は比較的薄いの
で、面として取扱う。天板12上に図示のような荷重W
を加えた場合の応力分布等を有限要素法で数値解析する
場合、図5(B)に示す如く、基台11を立体要素に分
割し、天板12を面要素に分割する。そして、各要素の
節点における変数の連立1次微分方程式を数値計算す
る。このような解析を各種条件の下に行い、解析結果に
応じてモデルの形状等を変更し、変更後のモデルに対し
同様の解析を行い、このような処理を繰返して最適モデ
ルを決定する。2. Description of the Related Art A case will be considered, for example, where stress analysis of a structure as shown in FIG. In the geometric model 10 of this structure, a top plate 12 wider than this upper surface is fixed to an upper surface of a base 11. Since the top plate 12 is relatively thin, it is treated as a surface. Load W as shown on the top plate 12
When numerically analyzing the stress distribution and the like in the case of adding the finite element method, as shown in FIG. 5B, the base 11 is divided into three-dimensional elements and the top plate 12 is divided into surface elements. Then, the simultaneous linear differential equations of variables at the nodes of each element are numerically calculated. Such an analysis is performed under various conditions, the shape of the model is changed according to the analysis result, the same analysis is performed on the changed model, and such processing is repeated to determine the optimum model.
【0003】製品のライフサイクル短期化に伴い、構造
物解析をより短時間で行うことが要求されている。With the shortening of the product life cycle, it is required to carry out structural analysis in a shorter time.
【0004】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】例えば図6に示す如
く、立体要素ECが(P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,
P6,P7,P8)で表され、面要素EPが(N1,N
2,N3,N4)で表されるとする。ここで、P1〜P
8及びN1〜N4はそれぞれ、立体要素EC及び面要素
EPの各節点の座標とする。この立体要素ECの面P5
P6P7P8が面要素EPと同一面である場合に、すな
わちN1=P5,N2=P6,N3=P7,N4=P8
である場合に、面要素EPが誤って(N1,N4,N
3,N2)のように立体要素ECのP5〜P8と反対方
向で表されていると、数値解析が不可能となったり、解
析結果が誤ったものとなる。For example, as shown in FIG. 6, the three-dimensional element EC is (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5,
P6, P7, P8), and the surface element EP is (N1, N
2, N3, N4). Where P1 to P
8 and N1 to N4 are the coordinates of the nodes of the three-dimensional element EC and the surface element EP, respectively. Surface P5 of this three-dimensional element EC
When P6P7P8 is the same surface as the surface element EP, that is, N1 = P5, N2 = P6, N3 = P7, N4 = P8
, The surface element EP is erroneously (N1, N4, N
If it is expressed in the direction opposite to P5 to P8 of the three-dimensional element EC as in (3, N2), the numerical analysis becomes impossible or the analysis result becomes erroneous.
【0005】このような場合、誤った計算に長時間を要
し、しかも、その誤りを発見し、誤りを修正して再度計
算し直さなければならないので、解析所要時間が長時間
となる。In such a case, an erroneous calculation requires a long time, and since the error must be found, the error must be corrected and the calculation must be performed again, the analysis time becomes long.
【0006】本発明の目的は、このような問題点に鑑
み、要素の表現の適否を自動的にチェックすることによ
り、解析所要時間を短縮化することが可能な有限要素検
査装置及びこれを用いた構造物解析方法を提供すること
にある。In view of the above problems, an object of the present invention is to provide a finite element inspection apparatus and a finite element inspection apparatus capable of shortening the analysis required time by automatically checking the adequacy of the expression of elements. To provide a method for analyzing a structure that has been used.
【0007】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段及びその作用】図1は、第
1発明に係る有限要素検査装置の原理構成を示す。[Means for Solving the Problem and Its Action] FIG. 1 shows the principle configuration of a finite element inspection apparatus according to the first invention.
【0008】第1発明は、構造物を有限要素法に基づい
て解析するために該構造物の幾何モデル10が立体要素
ECと面要素EPとに分割された該要素の表現を検査す
る有限要素検査装置であって、該要素の表現を入力する
入力手段1と、入力された該要素の該表現を記憶する要
素記憶手段2と、記憶されている面要素EPが立体要素
ECの面と同一面になっているかどうかを判断し同一面
と判断された面要素EP及び立体要素ECを抽出する共
有要素抽出手段3と、抽出された面要素EPを表す節点
座標N1,N2,N3,N4の順番の方向が、立体要素
ECの該同一面を表す節点座標P1,P2,P3,P4
の順番の方向と逆方向であるかどうかを判断する方向判
断手段4と、逆方向と判断された場合には、該判断対象
の面要素EP又は立体要素ECの表現がエラーであるこ
とを出力するエラー出力手段5とを備えている。なお、
節点座標N1,N2,N3,N4の順番をサイクリック
にずらしたものの方向、例えば、節点座標N2,N3,
N4,N1の順番の方向及び節点座標N3,N4,N
1,N2の順番の方向等は、節点座標N1,N2,N
3,N4の順番の方向と同一である。The first aspect of the present invention is a finite element which inspects the representation of the geometric model 10 of the structure divided into a three-dimensional element EC and a surface element EP in order to analyze the structure based on the finite element method. In the inspection apparatus, the input means 1 for inputting the expression of the element, the element storage means 2 for storing the input expression of the element, and the stored surface element EP are the same as the surface of the three-dimensional element EC. The shared element extraction unit 3 that determines whether or not the surface is a surface and extracts the surface element EP and the three-dimensional element EC that are determined to be the same surface, and the node coordinates N1, N2, N3, and N4 that represent the extracted surface element EP. The direction of order is the nodal coordinates P1, P2, P3, P4 representing the same plane of the three-dimensional element EC.
Direction determining means 4 for determining whether the direction is the reverse of the direction of the order, and if it is determined to be the reverse direction, output that the expression of the surface element EP or the three-dimensional element EC to be determined is an error. The error output means 5 is provided. In addition,
The direction of the node coordinates N1, N2, N3, N4, which are cyclically shifted, for example, the node coordinates N2, N3.
N4, N1 order direction and node coordinates N3, N4, N
The direction of the order of 1, N2, etc. is the node coordinates N1, N2, N
This is the same as the direction of the order of 3, N4.
【0009】第2発明の構造物解析方法では、構造物の
幾何モデル10を作成し、幾何モデル10を立体要素E
Cと面要素EPとに分割し、上記構成の有限要素検査装
置を用いて該要素の表現を検査し、有限要素検査装置か
らエラーが出力された場合にはこれを修正し、修正後の
該要素に対し有限要素法に基づいて数値解析を行う。In the structure analysis method of the second invention, the geometric model 10 of the structure is created and the geometric model 10 is used as the three-dimensional element E.
It is divided into C and surface element EP, the expression of the element is inspected by using the finite element inspection device having the above configuration, and if an error is output from the finite element inspection device, this is corrected and the corrected Numerical analysis is performed on the element based on the finite element method.
【0010】本発明によれば、解析実行前に要素の表現
の適否が自動的にチェックされ、これに基づいてエラー
が修正されるので、その後の数値解析において、計算不
可能となったり、計算結果が誤ったりするのが防止さ
れ、しかも、誤りの原因を人が判断する必要がないの
で、解析所要時間を短縮することが可能となる。According to the present invention, the suitability of the expression of the element is automatically checked before the analysis is executed, and the error is corrected based on this, so that it becomes impossible or impossible to calculate in the subsequent numerical analysis. It is possible to prevent the result from being erroneous, and it is not necessary for a person to determine the cause of the error, so that it is possible to reduce the analysis time.
【0011】[0011]
【実施例】以下、図面に基づいて本発明の一実施例を説
明する。DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
【0012】構造物解析装置のハードウエア構成は、計
算器と、データ入力装置と、データ出力装置とからなる
公知の構成であり、その説明を省略する。The hardware structure of the structure analysis device is a known structure including a calculator, a data input device, and a data output device, and a description thereof will be omitted.
【0013】図2は、この装置で有限要素法に基づき解
析を行う概略手順を示す。以下、括弧内の数値は、図中
のステップ識別番号を表す。FIG. 2 shows a schematic procedure for performing an analysis by this apparatus based on the finite element method. Hereinafter, the numerical value in the parenthesis represents the step identification number in the figure.
【0014】(20)CADで、例えば図5(A)に示
すような構造物幾何モデル10を会話的に作成する。(20) CAD is used to interactively create a structural geometric model 10 as shown in FIG. 5 (A).
【0015】(21)この幾何モデル10を、例えば図
5(B)に示すような立体要素ECと面要素EPとに分
割する。この分割は、計算器を用い、表示画面を見なが
ら会話的に行う。(21) The geometric model 10 is divided into a three-dimensional element EC and a surface element EP as shown in FIG. 5B, for example. This division is done interactively using a calculator while looking at the display screen.
【0016】(22)後の数値計算結果を有効なものと
するために、後述のように、分割された要素の表現をチ
ェックする。(22) In order to make the numerical calculation result after that effective, the expression of the divided elements is checked as described later.
【0017】(23、24)このチェックによりエラー
が検出された場合には、要素の表現を修正し、上記ステ
ップ22へ戻る。(23, 24) If an error is detected by this check, the expression of the element is corrected and the process returns to step 22.
【0018】(25)エラーが無くなった場合には、モ
デルを数値解析して応力分布や歪み分布等を得る。(25) When the error is eliminated, the model is numerically analyzed to obtain the stress distribution, strain distribution and the like.
【0019】(26)解析結果を表示装置に表示させ
る。(26) Display the analysis result on the display device.
【0020】次に、上記ステップ22の詳細を図3に基
づいて説明する。Next, the details of step 22 will be described with reference to FIG.
【0021】(30)解析精度向上のために、全ての立
体要素及び面要素について、各面が平面であるかどうか
をチェックする。面の種類は三角形と四角形のみであ
り、三角形は必ず平面であるので、四角形のみについて
チェックする。例えば図7(A)に示す如く、面N1N
2N3N4が平面であるかどうかを次のようにしてチェ
ックする。すなわち、三角形N1N2N3を含む面上に
N4から垂線を下ろしたときの該垂線の長さHを算出
し、長さHがほぼ0、すなわち、H≦εであれば面N1
N2N3N4が平面であると判断し、そうでなければ平
面が歪んでいると判断してエラーを出力する。(30) In order to improve the analysis accuracy, it is checked whether or not each surface is a plane for all three-dimensional elements and surface elements. There are only triangles and quadrilaterals as face types, and triangles are always planes, so check only quadrilaterals. For example, as shown in FIG. 7A, the surface N1N
Check if 2N3N4 is a plane as follows. That is, the length H of the perpendicular line when the perpendicular line is drawn from N4 on the surface including the triangle N1N2N3 is calculated, and if the length H is almost 0, that is, H ≦ ε, the surface N1 is calculated.
It is determined that N2N3N4 is a plane, and if not, a plane is distorted and an error is output.
【0022】(31、32)解析精度向上のために、立
体要素に対しては、例えば図7(B)に示すように押し
潰されたような形状であるかどうかを判断する。例え
ば、面P1P2P3P4上にP5、P6、P7及びP8
の各々から垂線を下ろしたときの各垂線の長さの最小値
Vminと、辺P1P5、P2P6、P3P7及びP4
P8の最小値Lminとを求め、Vmin/Lminが
1より小さい設定値、例えば0.6以上であるかどうか
を判断し、否定判定された場合にはエラーを出力する。(31, 32) In order to improve the analysis accuracy, it is determined whether or not the three-dimensional element has a crushed shape as shown in FIG. 7 (B), for example. For example, P5, P6, P7 and P8 on the plane P1P2P3P4
And the minimum value Vmin of the length of each perpendicular when the perpendicular is drawn from each of the sides, and sides P1P5, P2P6, P3P7 and P4.
The minimum value Lmin of P8 is obtained, and it is determined whether Vmin / Lmin is a set value smaller than 1, for example, 0.6 or more. If a negative determination is made, an error is output.
【0023】(31、33)面要素と立体要素とが共有
面を有する要素のみを抽出し、次に、抽出された面要素
を表す節点座標の順番の方向が、立体要素の該共有面を
表す節点座標の順番の方向と逆方向であるかどうかを判
断し、逆方向と判断した場合には、判断対象の面要素又
は立体要素の表現がエラーであることを出力する。この
判断及びエラー出力は、図4に示す如く、以下のように
して行う。(31, 33) Only elements having a shared surface between the surface element and the three-dimensional element are extracted, and then the direction of the order of the node coordinates representing the extracted surface element is the shared surface of the three-dimensional element. It is determined whether or not the direction is the reverse of the order of the represented node coordinates, and if it is determined to be the reverse direction, it is output that the expression of the surface element or the solid element to be determined is an error. This judgment and error output are performed as follows, as shown in FIG.
【0024】(40)面要素を読み出し、面要素の形状
が三角形又は四角形のいずれであるかを判断する。四角
形である場合には、以下ステップ41〜44の処理を行
い、三角形である場合には、ステップ51〜54の処理
を行う。(40) The surface element is read and it is determined whether the shape of the surface element is a triangle or a quadrangle. If it is a quadrangle, the processes of steps 41 to 44 are performed below, and if it is a triangle, the processes of steps 51 to 54 are performed.
【0025】(41)この面要素を表す節点座標の組、
例えば図6における面要素EP(N1,N2,N3,N
4)を抽出する。(41) A set of nodal coordinates representing this surface element,
For example, the surface element EP (N1, N2, N3, N in FIG.
4) is extracted.
【0026】(42)面要素EPの法線ベクトルNPを
算出する。例えばベクトルN1N2とベクトルN2N3
の外積N1N2×N2N3により法線ベクトルNPを算
出する。(42) The normal vector NP of the surface element EP is calculated. For example, vector N1N2 and vector N2N3
The normal vector NP is calculated by the outer product N1N2 × N2N3 of
【0027】(43)面要素EP(N1,N2,N3,
N4)と同一面を有する立体要素、すなわち、順番に関
係無く節点N1,N2,N3及びN4を含む立体要素、
例えば図6に示すような立体要素EC(P1,P2,P
3,P4,P5,P6,P7,P8)を抽出する。(43) Surface element EP (N1, N2, N3)
N4) has the same surface as the three-dimensional element, that is, a three-dimensional element including the nodes N1, N2, N3 and N4 in any order,
For example, the three-dimensional element EC (P1, P2, P
3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8) are extracted.
【0028】(44)共有面が問題面であるかどうか、
すなわち面要素EP(N1,N2,N3,N4)が立体
要素EC(P1,P2,P3,P4,P5,P6,P
7,P8)の前半の4個の節点で表される面(P1,P
2,P3,P4)又は後半の4個の節点で表される面
(P5,P6,P7,P8)と同一面であるかどうかを
判断する。同一面の場合には問題となり、ステップ45
へ進み、同一面でない場合には問題とならず、ステップ
49へ進む。(44) Whether the shared surface is a problem surface,
That is, the surface element EP (N1, N2, N3, N4) is the three-dimensional element EC (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P).
Surface (P1, P8) represented by four nodes in the first half of (7, P8)
2, P3, P4) or the same plane as the plane (P5, P6, P7, P8) represented by the four nodes in the latter half. If they are on the same side, it becomes a problem, and step 45
If it is not on the same plane, there is no problem and the process proceeds to step 49.
【0029】なお、面要素が三角形の場合のステップ5
1〜54での処理は、上記ステップ41〜44の説明か
ら容易に類推できるので、その説明を省略する。Step 5 when the surface element is a triangle
The processing in 1 to 54 can be easily inferred from the description of the above steps 41 to 44, and thus the description thereof will be omitted.
【0030】(45)立体要素ECの共有面の法線ベク
トルNCを算出する。例えば図6において、N1=P
5,N2=P6,N3=P7,N4=P8である場合、
ベクトルP5P6とベクトルP6P7の外積P5P6×
P6P7を法線ベクトルNCとして算出する。(45) The normal vector NC of the shared surface of the three-dimensional element EC is calculated. For example, in FIG. 6, N1 = P
5, N2 = P6, N3 = P7, N4 = P8,
Outer product of vector P5P6 and vector P6P7 P5P6 ×
P6P7 is calculated as the normal vector NC.
【0031】(46)上記の如く算出した法線ベクトル
NPと法線ベクトルNCの内積IM=NP・法線ベクト
ルNCを算出する。(46) The inner product IM = NP · normal vector NC of the normal vector NP and the normal vector NC calculated as described above is calculated.
【0032】(47、48)IM<0であれば、すなわ
ち法線ベクトルNPと法線ベクトルNCの向きが逆であ
れば、エラーメッセージを出力する。If (47, 48) IM <0, that is, if the directions of the normal vector NP and the normal vector NC are opposite, an error message is output.
【0033】(49)全ての面要素について、上記チェ
ックが終了していなければ、ステップ40へ戻る。(49) If the above checks have not been completed for all surface elements, the process returns to step 40.
【0034】以上のような処理により、解析実行前に要
素の表現の適否が自動的にチェックされ、これに基づい
てエラーが修正されるので、その後の数値解析におい
て、計算不可能となったり、計算結果が誤ったりするの
が防止され、しかも、誤りの原因を人が判断する必要が
ないので、解析所要時間を短縮することが可能となる。By the above processing, the suitability of the expression of the element is automatically checked before the analysis is executed, and the error is corrected based on this, so that the calculation becomes impossible in the subsequent numerical analysis, It is possible to prevent the calculation result from being erroneous, and moreover, since it is not necessary for a person to judge the cause of the error, it is possible to shorten the analysis required time.
【0035】[0035]
【発明の効果】以上説明した如く、本発明に係る有限要
素検査装置及びこれを用いた構造物解析方法によれば、
解析実行前に要素の表現の適否が自動的にチェックさ
れ、これに基づいてエラーが修正されるので、その後の
数値解析において、計算不可能となったり、計算結果が
誤ったりするのが防止され、しかも、誤りの原因を人が
判断する必要がないので、解析所要時間を短縮すること
が可能となるという優れた効果を奏し、製品開発期間の
短縮化に寄与するところが大きい。As described above, according to the finite element inspection apparatus and the structure analysis method using the same according to the present invention,
The validity of the expression of the element is automatically checked before executing the analysis, and the error is corrected based on this, so that it is possible to prevent the calculation from becoming impossible or the calculation result to be incorrect in the subsequent numerical analysis. In addition, since it is not necessary for a person to determine the cause of the error, the excellent effect that the analysis required time can be shortened is exerted, and it greatly contributes to shortening the product development period.
【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]
【図1】本発明に係る有限要素検査装置の原理構成を示
すブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a principle configuration of a finite element inspection device according to the present invention.
【図2】本発明の実施例に係り、有限要素法による解析
手順を示すフローチャートである。FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing an analysis procedure by the finite element method according to the embodiment of the present invention.
【図3】図2のステップ22の詳細フローチャートであ
る。FIG. 3 is a detailed flowchart of step 22 of FIG.
【図4】図3のステップ33の詳細フローチャートであ
る。FIG. 4 is a detailed flowchart of step 33 of FIG.
【図5】幾何モデル及びその要素分割の例示図である。FIG. 5 is an exemplary diagram of a geometric model and its element division.
【図6】共有面を有する面要素と立体要素を示す図であ
る。FIG. 6 is a diagram showing a surface element and a three-dimensional element having a common surface.
【図7】要素歪みチェック説明図である。FIG. 7 is an explanatory diagram of element distortion check.
10 幾何モデル 11 基台 12 天板 W 荷重 EP 面要素 EC 立体要素 NP、NC 法線ベクトル 10 geometric model 11 base 12 top plate W load EP surface element EC three-dimensional element NP, NC normal vector
Claims (2)
ために該構造物の幾何モデル(10)が立体要素(E
C)と面要素(EP)とに分割された該要素の表現を検
査する有限要素検査装置であって、 該要素の表現を入力する入力手段(1)と、 入力された該要素の該表現を記憶する要素記憶手段
(2)と、 記憶されている該面要素が該立体要素の面と同一面にな
っているかどうかを判断し同一面と判断された該面要素
及び該立体要素を抽出する共有要素抽出手段(3)と、 抽出された該面要素を表す節点座標(N1,N2,N
3,N4)の順番の方向が、該立体要素の該同一面を表
す節点座標(P1,P2,P3,P4)の順番の方向と
逆方向であるかどうかを判断する方向判断手段(4)
と、 逆方向と判断された場合には、該判断対象の該面要素又
は該立体要素の表現がエラーであることを出力するエラ
ー出力手段(5)と、 を有することを特徴とする有限要素検査装置。1. A geometric model (10) of a structure for analyzing a structure based on the finite element method, comprises a three-dimensional element (E).
A finite element inspection device for inspecting the expression of the element divided into C) and a surface element (EP), the input means (1) for inputting the expression of the element, and the expression of the input element And an element storage means (2) for storing, and extracting the surface element and the three-dimensional element determined to be the same surface by determining whether the stored surface element is the same surface as the surface of the three-dimensional element. Common element extraction means (3) for performing the above, and the nodal coordinates (N1, N2, N representing the extracted surface element).
Direction determining means (4) for determining whether or not the order direction of (3, N4) is opposite to the order direction of the node coordinates (P1, P2, P3, P4) representing the same plane of the three-dimensional element.
And an error output means (5) that outputs that the expression of the surface element or the three-dimensional element of the determination target is an error when it is determined to be in the opposite direction. Inspection device.
該幾何モデルを立体要素(EC)と面要素(EP)とに
分割し、請求項1の有限要素検査装置を用いて該要素の
表現を検査し、該有限要素検査装置から前記エラーが出
力された場合にはこれを修正し、修正後の該要素に対し
有限要素法に基づいて数値解析を行うことを特徴とする
構造物解析方法。2. Creating a geometric model (10) of a structure,
The geometric model is divided into three-dimensional elements (EC) and surface elements (EP), the expression of the element is inspected by using the finite element inspection device according to claim 1, and the error is output from the finite element inspection device. In the case of the above, this is corrected, and the numerical analysis is performed on the corrected element based on the finite element method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4207954A JPH0652268A (en) | 1992-08-04 | 1992-08-04 | Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4207954A JPH0652268A (en) | 1992-08-04 | 1992-08-04 | Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the same |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH0652268A true JPH0652268A (en) | 1994-02-25 |
Family
ID=16548292
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP4207954A Withdrawn JPH0652268A (en) | 1992-08-04 | 1992-08-04 | Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH0652268A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115512078A (en) * | 2022-10-12 | 2022-12-23 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A Method for In-plane Orientation Adjustment of Quadrilateral Mesh Elements with Finite Element Elements on Complex Surfaces |
-
1992
- 1992-08-04 JP JP4207954A patent/JPH0652268A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN115512078A (en) * | 2022-10-12 | 2022-12-23 | 中国航空工业集团公司西安飞机设计研究所 | A Method for In-plane Orientation Adjustment of Quadrilateral Mesh Elements with Finite Element Elements on Complex Surfaces |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10289770B2 (en) | Rotorcraft component simulation using scan-based geometry | |
| CN113361143B (en) | A method and device for analytical calculation and evaluation of dented pipeline strain | |
| CN119688841A (en) | Thin-wall structure damage positioning method and device based on curvature mode shape | |
| CN118392039B (en) | Composite wallboard blanking list determining and quality detecting method and device and terminal equipment | |
| JPH0652268A (en) | Finite element inspection device and structure analysis method using the same | |
| JPS63201876A (en) | Image processing method and device | |
| JP2002183739A (en) | Ellipse detection method and ellipse detection device | |
| JP4007857B2 (en) | Functional quality inspection method using 3D solid model | |
| KR102613835B1 (en) | Dimensional quality inspection method for reinforced concrete structures | |
| US11481529B2 (en) | Section measurement system | |
| JP2761134B2 (en) | Inspection method of finite element model | |
| JPH05225290A (en) | Shape correction system by three dimensional parametric function | |
| JPH11281328A (en) | Method for generating structural analysis model of blade and method and apparatus for structural analysis | |
| CN115294092B (en) | Method and device for taking image, industrial endoscope and computer readable storage medium | |
| US20260092876A1 (en) | Method for automated inspection of the surface of a solid object and system configured to execute the method | |
| JPH06139316A (en) | Product manufacturing method and apparatus, and three-dimensional object measuring method and apparatus | |
| JP2841326B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for estimating workpiece design values of measuring machine | |
| JP2000331171A (en) | Device and method for analyzing shape | |
| JP2000155405A (en) | Photomask data certification system | |
| JP3075012B2 (en) | Layout verification device and layout verification system | |
| JPH0822484A (en) | Device and method for automatically dividing element | |
| JPH1115857A (en) | Device and method for detecting interference component in two-dimensional cad | |
| JP3156488B2 (en) | Model format converter | |
| CN118862330A (en) | Digital twin 3D model inspection and simulation method and system for industrial equipment | |
| JPH01296142A (en) | Two-dimensional image comparison inspecting device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A300 | Application deemed to be withdrawn because no request for examination was validly filed |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 19991005 |