JPH0741388B2 - Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality - Google Patents

Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality

Info

Publication number
JPH0741388B2
JPH0741388B2 JP2143598A JP14359890A JPH0741388B2 JP H0741388 B2 JPH0741388 B2 JP H0741388B2 JP 2143598 A JP2143598 A JP 2143598A JP 14359890 A JP14359890 A JP 14359890A JP H0741388 B2 JPH0741388 B2 JP H0741388B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
reduction
roll
slab
stage
rolling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP2143598A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0437456A (en
Inventor
正蔵 川崎
高樹 秦
功 高木
研三 綾田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP2143598A priority Critical patent/JPH0741388B2/en
Publication of JPH0437456A publication Critical patent/JPH0437456A/en
Publication of JPH0741388B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0741388B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D11/00Continuous casting of metals, i.e. casting in indefinite lengths
    • B22D11/12Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ
    • B22D11/1206Accessories for subsequent treating or working cast stock in situ for plastic shaping of strands
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B1/00Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations
    • B21B1/46Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling metal immediately subsequent to continuous casting
    • B21B1/463Metal-rolling methods or mills for making semi-finished products of solid or profiled cross-section; Sequence of operations in milling trains; Layout of rolling-mill plant, e.g. grouping of stands; Succession of passes or of sectional pass alternations for rolling metal immediately subsequent to continuous casting in a continuous process, i.e. the cast not being cut before rolling
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21BROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B2267/00Roll parameters
    • B21B2267/02Roll dimensions
    • B21B2267/06Roll diameter

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Continuous Casting (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 〔産業上の利用分野〕 本発明は、内部品質に優れた連続鋳造鋳片の製造方法に
関し、特に、中心偏析やポロシティが改善された連続鋳
造鋳片の製造方法に関する。
Description: TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to a method for producing a continuously cast slab having excellent internal quality, and more particularly to a method for producing a continuously cast slab having improved center segregation and porosity. .

〔従来の技術〕[Conventional technology]

従来より、連続鋳造鋳片(以下鋳片と言う)の中心部に
は炭素等の正偏析、所謂中心偏析が生じ、鋳片の品質上
の問題となっている。そして、この中心偏析は、一般
に、次の如くして生成されるものと考えられている。す
なわち、凝固にともなう溶質の分配により固液共存相の
溶鋼の成分元素が濃化され、この濃化溶鋼が凝固収縮や
ロール間バルジングにより流動して鋳片中心部に集積さ
れ、凝固末期の鋳片中心部において、集積された凝固直
前の濃化溶鋼が、凝固収縮やロール間バルジングによっ
て生じる負圧部に吸引されて、中心偏析が生成される。
Conventionally, positive segregation of carbon or the like, so-called center segregation occurs in the center of a continuously cast slab (hereinafter referred to as slab), which is a problem in terms of slab quality. Then, this center segregation is generally considered to be generated as follows. That is, the component elements of the molten steel in the solid-liquid coexisting phase are concentrated by the distribution of solutes accompanying solidification, and this concentrated molten steel flows due to solidification shrinkage and bulging between rolls and accumulates at the center of the slab, resulting in casting at the end of solidification. At the central part of one piece, the concentrated concentrated molten steel immediately before solidification is sucked into the negative pressure part generated by solidification contraction or bulging between rolls, and central segregation is generated.

一方、このような中心偏析の生成機構を元に、中心偏析
の改善策として、鋳片の凝固末期部にロールによる軽圧
下を施し、凝固収縮やロール間バルジングによって生じ
る負圧部の発生を抑制して、固液共存相の液相の流動を
極力抑え、中心偏析やポロシティの低減を図る技術が提
案されている。例えば、特公昭62-34460号公報には、溶
鋼を電磁攪拌により攪拌して鋳造組織の微細化を図るこ
とに加え、鋳片凝固末期部の固相線のクレータエンドか
ら上流側に向かって少なくとも2mの範囲を、450mm以下
のロールピッチに設定された圧下ロールによって圧下率
0.5mm/m以上で軽圧下し、これによって、鋳片に生じる
バルジングを防止するとともに、鋳片中心部の固液共存
相内溶鋼の流動を防止し、偏析のない連続鋳造鋳片を製
造する方法が提供されている。
On the other hand, based on such a mechanism of center segregation generation, as a measure to improve center segregation, a slight reduction by rolls is applied to the final stage of solidification of the slab to suppress the generation of negative pressure parts caused by solidification contraction and bulging between rolls. Then, a technique for suppressing the flow of the liquid phase of the solid-liquid coexisting phase as much as possible to reduce the center segregation and the porosity has been proposed. For example, in Japanese Examined Patent Publication No. 62-34460, in addition to stirring the molten steel by electromagnetic stirring to refine the cast structure, at least from the crater end of the solidus line of the final stage of solidification of the slab toward the upstream side. Rolling rate of 2m range by rolling roll set to roll pitch less than 450mm
By lightly reducing at 0.5 mm / m or more, this prevents bulging that occurs in the slab and prevents the flow of molten steel in the solid-liquid coexisting phase at the center of the slab, producing a continuous cast slab without segregation. A method is provided.

〔発明が解決しようとする課題〕[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]

ところで、上述した鋳片の製造方法のように、ロールピ
ッチが450mm以下になるように圧下ロールを設定する場
合、ロール径は必然的に450mm以下のものを使用しなけ
ればならず小径ロールとなる。一方、中心偏析改善に必
要な指標の一つとして、圧下前後の鋳片厚さの差〔総圧
下量(mm)〕を圧下帯の長さ(m)で除した圧下率〔す
なわち圧下勾配(mm/m)〕が一般的に使用されており、
これにより各ロールには圧下量(mm)が等しくかけられ
ている。
By the way, as in the above-described method for producing a cast piece, when setting the reduction roll so that the roll pitch is 450 mm or less, the roll diameter is necessarily 450 mm or less and must be a small diameter roll. . On the other hand, as one of the indexes necessary for improving the center segregation, the difference in the thickness of the slab before and after the reduction [total reduction amount (mm)] divided by the length (m) of the reduction zone [that is, the reduction gradient (that is, the reduction gradient ( mm / m)] is commonly used,
As a result, the same amount of reduction (mm) is applied to each roll.

従って、上述した鋳片の製造方法により、厚さに比べて
幅が大きいスラブ鋳片の凝固末期部を小径ロールにより
圧下した場合、中心偏析やポロシティが低減され良好な
鋳片が得られるが、ロールの圧下量が大きい場合は内部
ひずみが大きくなることから、時として内部割れを有す
る鋳片が製造されることがある。
Therefore, by the method for producing a slab described above, when the solidification end portion of the slab slab having a larger width than the thickness is rolled down by a small-diameter roll, center segregation and porosity are reduced, and a good slab is obtained. When the rolling amount of the roll is large, the internal strain becomes large, so that a slab having internal cracks is sometimes produced.

一方、鋳片がブルームやビレットの場合は、スラブに比
較して、鋳片断面形状が正方形に近いことから、凝固末
期部を小径ロールにより圧下しても内部変形が生じにく
く、このため、中心偏析改善効果を得るためには、鋳片
に対し大きな圧下量をとらねばならなくなる。しかし圧
下量を大きくとると、凝固界面やその近傍の無強度凝固
殻に大きな引張ひずみ(以下内部ひずみと言う)が発生
し内部割れが発生し易くなる他、圧下による鋳片の偏平
化が大きくなり次工程の圧延加工に支障を来すことにな
る。このようなことから、鋳片がブルームやビレットの
場合には、未だ実用化に至っていない。
On the other hand, when the slab is a bloom or billet, as compared to a slab, the slab has a square cross-sectional shape, so internal deformation does not occur easily even when the final solidification stage is rolled down by a small-diameter roll. In order to obtain the segregation improving effect, it is necessary to obtain a large amount of reduction with respect to the cast slab. However, when the amount of reduction is large, a large tensile strain (hereinafter referred to as internal strain) is easily generated in the solidified interface and the non-strengthened solidified shell in the vicinity of the solidified interface, and internal cracking easily occurs. This will hinder the rolling process in the next process. For this reason, when the cast piece is a bloom or billet, it has not yet been put to practical use.

本発明は、上記問題点に鑑みてなされたものであって、
その目的は、中心偏析やポロシティの低減は元より、内
部割れのない、内部品質に優れたスラブ、ブルーム等の
鋳片の製造方法を提供することにある。
The present invention has been made in view of the above problems,
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for producing slabs such as slabs and blooms having excellent internal quality without causing internal cracking as well as reducing center segregation and porosity.

〔課題を解決するための手段〕[Means for Solving the Problems]

上記目的を達成するために、本発明に係わる内部品質に
優れた連続鋳造鋳片の製造方法は、鋳型によって連続鋳
造される鋳片の凝固末期部に、鋳片の厚さの2〜5倍の
直径を有する圧下ロールを2段配設するとともに、1段
目の圧下ロールの圧下率を1.5〜4.0%に、2段目の圧下
ロールの圧下率を2.0〜4.5%に設定して圧下するもので
ある。
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the method for producing a continuously cast slab excellent in internal quality according to the present invention has a thickness of 2 to 5 times the thickness of the slab at the end of solidification of the slab continuously cast by the mold. The reduction roll having the diameter of 2 is arranged in two stages, and the reduction ratio of the first reduction roll is set to 1.5 to 4.0%, and the reduction ratio of the second reduction roll is set to 2.0 to 4.5%. It is a thing.

また、鋳片の厚さの2〜5倍の直径を有する圧下ロール
を3段配設する場合は、1段目と2段目の圧下ロールの
圧下率を上記の圧下率に設定し、3段目は特に圧下を加
える必要はないが、もし3段目の圧下ロールによる圧下
を加える場合にはその圧下率を2.0〜4.5%に設定して圧
下することが望ましい。
Moreover, when arranging three reduction rolls having a diameter of 2 to 5 times the thickness of the slab, the reduction ratios of the first reduction roll and the second reduction roll are set to the above reduction ratios. Although it is not necessary to apply the reduction to the third stage, if the third stage reduction roll is used, it is desirable to set the reduction rate to 2.0 to 4.5% and perform the reduction.

以下、本発明を詳細に説明する。Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail.

従来より、連続鋳造において鋳型から引出された鋳片
は、その内部に未凝固溶鋼を有し、その溶鋼静圧により
鋳片が膨出する所謂バルジングが起こる。このため、こ
のバルジングを押さえるために、鋳型下の冷却ゾーンの
ガイドロールは、一般に、そのロール径をできるだけ小
さい(通常、鋳片厚さの1.5倍未満)ものを用いて、ロ
ール間隔を極力狭めて設けてある。このようなことか
ら、前述した鋳片の凝固末期部を圧下する圧下ロールも
ロール間隔を極力狭めて設ける方が好ましいと考えられ
るところであるが、ロール間隔を狭めるためには、ロー
ル径を小さくしなければならず、このように、圧下ロー
ルのロール径を小さいものにすると、鋳片の中心偏析や
ポロシティの低減のためには、鋳片に対する圧下率を大
きくとる必要が生じ、反面、圧下率を大きくとった場
合、内部ひずみが大きくなることから鋳片の内部割れが
懸念されることになる。
Conventionally, a slab pulled out from a mold in continuous casting has unsolidified molten steel inside, and so-called bulging occurs in which the slab bulges due to the static pressure of the molten steel. Therefore, in order to suppress this bulging, use a guide roll in the cooling zone under the mold that has a roll diameter that is as small as possible (usually less than 1.5 times the thickness of the slab) to minimize the roll gap. Is provided. From such a point, it is considered that it is preferable to provide the pressing roll for pressing down the final stage of solidification of the cast slab as narrowly as possible, but in order to narrow the roll interval, reduce the roll diameter. In this way, if the roll diameter of the reduction roll is made small in this way, in order to reduce the center segregation of the slab and the porosity, it is necessary to take a large reduction ratio for the slab, but on the other hand, the reduction ratio When the value is large, the internal strain becomes large, so that internal cracking of the slab becomes a concern.

そこで、本発明者等が鋭意研究した結果、鋳型によって
連続鋳造される鋳片の凝固末期部に、鋳片の厚さの2〜
5倍の直径を有する圧下ロールを2段配設するととも
に、1段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を1.5〜4.0%に、2段
目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0〜4.5%に設定して圧下す
れば、中心偏析やポロシティの低減は元より、内部割れ
のない鋳片が製造できることを見出したものである。ま
たさらに、鋳片の厚さの2〜5倍の直径を有する圧下ロ
ールを3段配設し3段目の圧下ロールによる圧下を加え
る場合には、3段目の圧下ロールによる圧下を、圧下率
で2.0〜4.5%加えることにより、より中心偏析が改善さ
れた鋳片が製造できることを見出したものである。
Therefore, as a result of diligent research conducted by the present inventors, the thickness of the slab is 2 to 2 at the end of solidification of the slab continuously cast by the mold.
Two reduction rolls having a diameter of 5 times are arranged, and the reduction ratio of the first reduction roll is set to 1.5 to 4.0% and the reduction ratio of the second reduction roll is set to 2.0 to 4.5%. It was discovered that, if it is pressed, not only the center segregation and the reduction of porosity are reduced, but also a slab without internal cracks can be manufactured. Furthermore, in the case where three stages of reduction rolls having a diameter of 2 to 5 times the thickness of the slab are provided and the reduction by the third stage reduction roll is applied, the reduction by the third stage reduction roll is performed. It was found that a slab with further improved center segregation can be produced by adding 2.0 to 4.5% in the ratio.

このように、圧下ロールを大径ロールにすると、第1図
に示すように、同じ圧下率(圧下量Δh/圧下前の鋳片厚
さh×100%)の場合、小径ロール(1)に比較して、
大径ロール(2)の方が接触長(l)が長くなり(l1
l2)、延いては接触面積が大きくなることから、接触面
における大径ロール(2)の表面と鋳片(3)の表面の
摩擦が有効に得られ、大径ロール(2)の表面に接触し
ている鋳片(3)の表層部は、鋳片(3)の長手方向お
よび幅方向への変形が、小径ロール(1)の場合よりも
より大きく抑制されることになる。そして、このよう
に、鋳片(3)の長手方向および幅方向への変形が大き
く抑制されると、圧下方向への変形量が大きく得られる
ことになり、従って、大径ロール(2)の場合は、小径
ロール(1)の場合よりも圧下率を小さくして、小径ロ
ール(1)の場合と同じ圧下方向への変形量が得られ
る。また、圧下率を小さくできることにより、鋳片
(3)の圧下による偏平化が小さくて済むことから、次
工程の圧延加工に支障を来すことなくブルーム等の厚さ
の厚い鋳片に対しても圧下を加えることができる。
In this way, if the reduction roll is a large-diameter roll, as shown in FIG. 1, in the case of the same reduction rate (reduction amount Δh / thickness of cast h before reduction h × 100%), it is changed to a small-diameter roll (1). Compared to,
The contact length (l) of the large diameter roll (2) is longer (l 1
l 2 ), and hence the contact area is increased, friction between the surface of the large diameter roll (2) and the surface of the cast slab (3) at the contact surface can be effectively obtained, and the surface of the large diameter roll (2) can be obtained. In the surface layer portion of the cast slab (3) which is in contact with, the deformation of the cast slab (3) in the longitudinal direction and the width direction is suppressed more than in the case of the small diameter roll (1). When the deformation of the cast slab (3) in the longitudinal direction and the width direction is largely suppressed in this way, a large amount of deformation in the rolling direction can be obtained, and thus, the large diameter roll (2) In this case, the rolling reduction is made smaller than in the case of the small diameter roll (1), and the same amount of deformation in the rolling direction as in the case of the small diameter roll (1) is obtained. In addition, since the reduction ratio can be made small, the flattening of the cast slab (3) due to the reduction of the slab can be small. Can also be rolled down.

次に、本発明において圧下ロールの径を鋳片厚さの2〜
5の範囲に特定した理由を述べる。
Next, in the present invention, the diameter of the reduction roll is set to 2 to the thickness of the slab.
The reason for specifying the range of 5 will be described.

第2図に示すグラフは、有限要素法により数値解析して
求めたもので、厚さ300mmの鋳片の凝固末期部を同じ圧
下率(約2.7%)で且つロール径を400mm,600mm,1000mm
に変えて圧下した時の鋳片の内部ひずみ,未凝固部の断
面積圧縮量,未凝固部の変形量の変化を表したグラフで
ある。この第2図から明らかなように、同じ圧下率であ
れば、ロール径が鋳片厚さとの比で2倍以上になると、
未凝固部の断面積圧縮量,未凝固部の変形量が飛躍的に
大きくなり、中心偏析等の改善効果に大きく寄与する
が、2倍未満では、未凝固部の断面積圧縮量,未凝固部
の変形量が小さく中心偏析等の改善効果が期待できな
い。このため、圧下ロールの径を鋳片厚さの2倍以上に
特定した。一方、圧下ロールの径の上限を鋳片厚さの5
倍以下に特定したのは、5倍以上にすると、圧下ロール
間隔が大きくなりすぎ、圧下ロール間で鋳片のバルジン
グが生じ、鋳片の凝固末期部の圧下作用が充分に得られ
なくなるためである。
The graph shown in Fig. 2 is obtained by numerical analysis by the finite element method. The final solidification part of a 300 mm thick slab has the same rolling reduction (about 2.7%) and roll diameters of 400 mm, 600 mm and 1000 mm.
It is a graph showing changes in the internal strain of the slab, the amount of compression of the cross-sectional area of the unsolidified portion, and the amount of deformation of the unsolidified portion when the steel sheet is rolled down instead of. As is clear from FIG. 2, if the roll diameter is more than twice the ratio with the thickness of the slab for the same reduction ratio,
The amount of compression of the cross-sectional area of the unsolidified portion and the amount of deformation of the unsolidified portion dramatically increase, which greatly contributes to the effect of improving center segregation. The amount of deformation of the part is small and improvement effects such as center segregation cannot be expected. Therefore, the diameter of the reduction roll is specified to be twice the thickness of the cast piece or more. On the other hand, the upper limit of the diameter of the reduction roll is set to 5 of the cast piece thickness.
It is specified to be not more than twice, because if it is not less than 5 times, the reduction roll interval becomes too large, bulging of the slab occurs between the reduction rolls, and the reduction action at the final solidification stage of the slab cannot be sufficiently obtained. is there.

次に、本発明において2乃至3段配設した圧下ロールの
圧下率を特定した理由を述べる。
Next, the reason why the reduction rate of the reduction rolls arranged in two or three stages in the present invention is specified will be described.

1段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を1.5〜4.0%に特定したの
は、圧下率が1.5%未満では圧下が少なく偏析、特にV
偏析が発生する。一方圧下率が4.0%超では圧下が大き
くなりすぎ内部割れを生じる。このため、1段目の圧下
ロールの圧下率を1.5〜4.0%に特定した。
The reduction ratio of the first-stage reduction roll is specified to be 1.5 to 4.0% because the reduction ratio is less than 1.5% and the reduction is small, especially V
Segregation occurs. On the other hand, if the rolling reduction exceeds 4.0%, the rolling will be too large and internal cracking will occur. Therefore, the reduction rate of the first-stage reduction roll is specified to be 1.5 to 4.0%.

2段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0〜4.5%に特定したの
は、圧下率が2.0%未満では1段目の圧下ロールの場合
と同様に圧下が少なく偏析、特にV偏析が発生する。一
方圧下率が4.5%超では圧下が大きくなりすぎ内部割れ
を生じると共に、未凝固溶鋼が上流に流れ逆V偏析が生
じる。このため、2段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0〜
4.5%に特定した。
The reduction ratio of the second-stage reduction roll is specified to be 2.0 to 4.5% because when the reduction ratio is less than 2.0%, the reduction is small and segregation, particularly V segregation occurs, as in the case of the first-stage reduction roll. On the other hand, if the reduction ratio exceeds 4.5%, the reduction becomes too large and internal cracking occurs, and unsolidified molten steel flows upstream and reverse V segregation occurs. Therefore, the reduction rate of the second-stage reduction roll is 2.0 to
Specified at 4.5%.

さらに、本発明において3段目の圧下ロールを設け圧下
を加えるのであれば、上記1段および2段の圧下に加
え、圧下率で2.0〜4.5%の圧下を加えるとよい。その理
由は、2段目の圧下ロールによる圧下で十分ではある
が、より中心偏析やポロシティが改善されるためで、圧
下率が2.0%未満では改善効果が得られず、また4.5%を
超えると圧下が大きくなりすぎ内部割れを生じると共
に、未凝固溶鋼が上流に流れ逆V偏析が生じるためであ
る。
Further, in the present invention, if a third-stage reduction roll is provided and reduction is performed, it is preferable to add reduction of 2.0 to 4.5% as a reduction ratio in addition to the above-described first and second reductions. The reason is that the reduction by the second-stage reduction roll is sufficient, but the center segregation and porosity are further improved. If the reduction rate is less than 2.0%, the improvement effect cannot be obtained, and if it exceeds 4.5%. This is because the reduction becomes too large and internal cracking occurs, and unsolidified molten steel flows upstream and reverse V segregation occurs.

また、圧下をかける位置は、連続鋳造される鋳片の凝固
末期部であるが、好ましくは、一般に用いられている下
記凝固の式により求められる等軸晶開始点の前後から凝
固終了点(クレーターエンド)までの長さ(a)の間が
よく、1段目の圧下ロールはa〜a/2の範囲に設けると
よい。
Further, the position where the reduction is applied is the end of solidification of the continuously cast slab, but preferably the solidification end point (crater) is determined before and after the equiaxed crystal start point obtained by the following commonly used solidification equation. The length (a) up to the end) is good, and the first-stage reduction roll is preferably provided in the range of a to a / 2.

(凝固の式)χ=K(A/V)-1/2 χ:凝固シェル厚さ(mm) K :凝固係数(mm・min-1/2) A :メニスカスからの距離(m) V :鋳造速度(m/min) 〔実施例〕 以下、本発明の実施例を説明する。(Coagulation formula) χ = K (A / V) -1/2 χ: Solidified shell thickness (mm) K: Solidification coefficient (mm ・ min -1/2 ) A: Distance from meniscus (m) V: Casting speed (m / min) [Examples] Examples of the present invention will be described below.

第3図は、本発明方法に適用される3段圧下装置の概要
図であって、図において、(3)は凝固末期部における
鋳片、(4)は鋳片内の未凝固溶鋼部、(5)はロール
径が1000mmの圧下ロール、(6)は上圧下ロール(5)
を圧下するためのシリンダを示す。
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a three-stage reduction device applied to the method of the present invention, in which (3) is a cast piece at the final solidification stage, (4) is an unsolidified molten steel portion in the cast piece, (5) is a reduction roll having a roll diameter of 1000 mm, (6) is an upper reduction roll (5)
Shows a cylinder for rolling down.

下表に示す鋼種を用いて断面300×430mm2の鋳片を、上
記3段圧下装置を使用して連続的に製造した。この時の
製造条件は、鋳造速度:0.69m/分,圧下ロール径:1000m
m,ロールピッチ:1.2m,圧下ロール位置(メニスカスから
の距離)1段目:22.6m,2段目:23.8m,3段目:25.0mとし
た。
A slab having a cross section of 300 × 430 mm 2 was continuously produced using the steel types shown in the table below by using the above-described three-stage reduction device. The manufacturing conditions at this time are: casting speed: 0.69 m / min, rolling roll diameter: 1000 m
m, roll pitch: 1.2 m, reduction roll position (distance from meniscus) 1st stage: 22.6 m, 2nd stage: 23.8 m, 3rd stage: 25.0 m.

上記条件において、1段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を変化
させ、この時の内部割れを調査した。結果を第4図に示
す。図によれば、圧下ロールの圧下率が4.0%を超える
と内部割れが生じ、4.0%以下では内部割れが無かっ
た。
Under the above conditions, the rolling reduction of the first-stage rolling roll was changed, and the internal cracks at this time were investigated. Results are shown in FIG. According to the figure, when the rolling reduction of the rolling roll exceeds 4.0%, internal cracking occurs, and when it is 4.0% or less, there is no internal cracking.

次に、1段目の圧下を圧下率で1.5〜4.0%加え、さらに
2段目の圧下ロールによる圧下率を変化させ、これによ
り得られた鋳片のC偏析最大比(最大C偏析/平均C偏
析)を調査した。また比較のため1段目の圧下を圧下率
で1.5%未満加えて同様の調査を行った。これらの結果
を第5図に示す。図によれば、前者は2段目の圧下率が
2.0〜4.5%の範囲において、鋳造以降の加工工程におけ
る偏析によるトラブル(例えば伸線時の破断等)が防止
できる限界以内の偏析に改善されたが、後者は圧下率が
2.0〜4.5%の範囲においても偏析の改善が不十分であっ
た。
Next, the first stage reduction is applied at a reduction rate of 1.5 to 4.0%, the reduction rate by the second stage reduction roll is changed, and the C segregation maximum ratio (maximum C segregation / average C segregation) was investigated. For comparison, the same investigation was conducted by adding the reduction of the first stage in a reduction rate of less than 1.5%. These results are shown in FIG. According to the figure, the former has
In the range of 2.0 to 4.5%, troubles due to segregation in the working process after casting (for example, breakage during wire drawing) were improved to within the limit that can prevent segregation.
Even in the range of 2.0 to 4.5%, the improvement of segregation was insufficient.

次に、1段目の圧下を圧下率で1.5〜4.0%、2段目の圧
下を圧下率で2.0〜4.5%加え、3段目の圧下ロールによ
る圧下率を変化させ、これにより得られた鋳片のC偏析
最大比を調査した。結果を第6図に示す。図に示す如く
圧下率が2.0〜4.5%の範囲において、上記2段目までの
偏析改善効果より大きく偏析が改善された。
Next, the reduction rate of the first stage is 1.5 to 4.0%, the reduction rate of the second stage is 2.0 to 4.5%, and the reduction rate by the reduction roll of the third stage is changed. The maximum C segregation ratio of the slab was investigated. Results are shown in FIG. As shown in the figure, in the rolling reduction range of 2.0 to 4.5%, the segregation was improved more than the segregation improving effect up to the second stage.

そしてさらに、上記2段目までの圧下により得られた鋳
片を直径8mmまで圧延し、得られた圧延品の横断面をマ
クロエッチングにより評価した。
Further, the slab obtained by the rolling down to the second step was rolled to a diameter of 8 mm, and the cross section of the obtained rolled product was evaluated by macro etching.

評価結果を第7図に示す。図より明らかなように本発明
例では(良)が多くなるのに対し、比較例では(やや
良)止まりであった。
The evaluation results are shown in FIG. As is clear from the figure, in the example of the present invention, the number of (good) was large, whereas in the comparative example, it was (slightly) good.

〔発明の効果〕〔The invention's effect〕

上述したように、本発明に係わる内部品質に優れた連続
鋳造鋳片の製造方法によれば、中心偏析やポロシティの
比較的少ない、且つ内部割れのない内部品質に優れたス
ラブ、ブルーム等の鋳片が製造できる。
As described above, according to the method for producing a continuously cast slab excellent in internal quality according to the present invention, casting of slabs, blooms and the like having relatively low center segregation and porosity and excellent internal quality without internal cracking Pieces can be manufactured.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は、本発明方法を従来法と比較して説明するため
の説明図、第2図は、有限要素法により数値解析して求
めたロール径と、鋳片の内部ひずみ,未凝固部の断面積
圧縮量,未凝固部の変形量との関係を示すグラフ図、第
3図は、本発明方法に適用される3段圧下装置の概要
図、第4図は、1段目の圧下ロールによる圧下率と鋳片
の内部割れとの関係を示す図、第5図は、1段目の圧下
に加え2段目の圧下を加えた場合の2段目の圧下ロール
による圧下率と鋳片のC偏析最大比との関係を示す図、
第6図は、1段目の圧下および2段目の圧下に加え、さ
らに3段目の圧下を加えた場合の3段目の圧下ロールに
よる圧下率と鋳片のC偏析最大比との関係を示す図、第
7図は、本発明法と比較法とにより得られた圧延品の横
断面をマクロエッチングして得た評価図である。 1……小径ロール、2……大径ロール 3……鋳片、4……未凝固溶鋼部 5……圧下ロール、6……圧下シリンダ l1,l2……接触長 Δh……圧下量
FIG. 1 is an explanatory view for explaining the method of the present invention in comparison with a conventional method, and FIG. 2 is a roll diameter obtained by numerical analysis by a finite element method, internal strain of a cast piece, and an unsolidified portion. Fig. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the amount of cross-sectional area compression and the amount of deformation of the unsolidified portion. Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a three-stage reduction device applied to the method of the present invention. Fig. 4 is the first-stage reduction. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the relationship between the rolling reduction by the roll and the internal cracking of the slab, and FIG. 5 shows the rolling reduction by the second-stage rolling roll and the casting when the second-stage rolling is applied in addition to the first-stage rolling. The figure which shows the relationship with the C segregation maximum ratio of a piece,
FIG. 6 shows the relationship between the reduction ratio by the third-stage reduction roll and the maximum C segregation ratio of the slab when the third-stage reduction is applied in addition to the first-stage reduction and the second-stage reduction. And FIG. 7 are evaluation diagrams obtained by macro-etching the cross section of the rolled product obtained by the method of the present invention and the comparative method. 1 ... Small-diameter roll, 2 ... Large-diameter roll 3 ... Slab, 4 ... Unsolidified molten steel part 5 ... Rolling roll, 6 ... Rolling cylinder l 1 , l 2 ...... Contact length Δh …… Rolling amount

Claims (2)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】鋳型によって連続鋳造される鋳片の凝固末
期部に、鋳片の厚さの2〜5倍の直径を有する圧下ロー
ルを2段配設するとともに、1段目の圧下ロールの圧下
率を1.5〜4.0%に、2段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0
〜4.5%に設定して圧下することを特徴とする内部品質
に優れた連続鋳造鋳片の製造方法。
1. A reduction roll having a diameter of 2 to 5 times the thickness of the slab is provided in two stages at the end of solidification of the slab continuously cast by a mold, and at the same time, The rolling reduction is 1.5 to 4.0%, and the rolling reduction of the second-stage rolling roll is 2.0.
A method for producing a continuously cast slab having excellent internal quality, which is characterized by setting to ~ 4.5% for reduction.
【請求項2】鋳型によって連続鋳造される鋳片の凝固末
期部に、鋳片の厚さの2〜5倍の直径を有する圧下ロー
ルを3段配設するとともに、1段目の圧下ロールの圧下
率を1.5〜4.0%に、2段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0
〜4.5%に、3段目の圧下ロールの圧下率を2.0〜4.5%
に設定して圧下することを特徴とする内部品質に優れた
連続鋳造鋳片の製造方法。
2. A reduction roll having a diameter of 2 to 5 times the thickness of the slab is arranged in three stages at the final stage of solidification of the slab continuously cast by a mold, and the first reduction roll is The rolling reduction is 1.5 to 4.0%, and the rolling reduction of the second-stage rolling roll is 2.0.
To 4.5%, the reduction rate of the third stage rolling roll is 2.0 to 4.5%
A method for producing a continuously cast slab having excellent internal quality, which is characterized in that it is set to a lower temperature.
JP2143598A 1990-05-31 1990-05-31 Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality Expired - Lifetime JPH0741388B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2143598A JPH0741388B2 (en) 1990-05-31 1990-05-31 Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2143598A JPH0741388B2 (en) 1990-05-31 1990-05-31 Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0437456A JPH0437456A (en) 1992-02-07
JPH0741388B2 true JPH0741388B2 (en) 1995-05-10

Family

ID=15342448

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2143598A Expired - Lifetime JPH0741388B2 (en) 1990-05-31 1990-05-31 Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0741388B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05228598A (en) * 1992-02-20 1993-09-07 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of continuously cast slab having excellent internal quality
JP3008821B2 (en) * 1994-07-29 2000-02-14 住友金属工業株式会社 Continuous casting method and apparatus for thin slab
JP5342904B2 (en) * 2008-03-26 2013-11-13 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Slab slab continuous casting equipment
JP5342905B2 (en) * 2009-03-25 2013-11-13 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Slab slab continuous casting equipment
PL3012044T3 (en) * 2013-06-18 2018-09-28 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Continuous casting method for casting for extra thick steel sheet
WO2015174395A1 (en) 2014-05-14 2015-11-19 新日鐵住金株式会社 Continuous casting method for slab
JP2020006398A (en) * 2018-07-06 2020-01-16 日本製鉄株式会社 Reduction method of continuous casting
JP6794585B1 (en) * 2020-01-21 2020-12-02 日本製鉄株式会社 Manufacturing method of titanium material for hot rolling

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0437456A (en) 1992-02-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JPH0741388B2 (en) Method for producing continuously cast slabs with excellent internal quality
CN2579561Y (en) Continuous blank withdrawal straightening device with light pressing function
JP3045052B2 (en) Roll segment device for continuous casting machine
JPH03124352A (en) Production of continuously cast slab having excellent internal quality
JPH08132205A (en) Method and apparatus for improving center segregation of slab in continuous casting
JPS61132247A (en) Continuous casting method
JPH08238550A (en) Continuous casting method for steel
JP3111954B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JPS6234461B2 (en)
JP3271574B2 (en) Continuous casting method of billet slab
JPH078421B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3362703B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3452799B2 (en) Continuous casting guide roll device and continuous casting method
JP3240978B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab
JPH0573506B2 (en)
JP3114671B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP3394730B2 (en) Continuous casting method of steel slab
JP4250008B2 (en) Manufacturing method of steel for strip steel
JP3275828B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3277873B2 (en) Manufacturing method of continuous cast slab
JP4177541B2 (en) Billet continuous casting method and slab
JP7273307B2 (en) Steel continuous casting method
JP3498586B2 (en) Continuous casting method
JP3402250B2 (en) Manufacturing method of round billet slab by continuous casting
JPH11309552A (en) Method and apparatus for producing continuous cast round slab

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080510

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090510

Year of fee payment: 14

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100510

Year of fee payment: 15

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100510

Year of fee payment: 15

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110510

Year of fee payment: 16

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110510

Year of fee payment: 16