JPH075155A - Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification method - Google Patents
Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification methodInfo
- Publication number
- JPH075155A JPH075155A JP5171117A JP17111793A JPH075155A JP H075155 A JPH075155 A JP H075155A JP 5171117 A JP5171117 A JP 5171117A JP 17111793 A JP17111793 A JP 17111793A JP H075155 A JPH075155 A JP H075155A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- waveform
- feature amount
- circuit
- type
- defect
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【0001】[0001]
【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、超音波を使用して被検
査材の割れ又は介在物等を判別する超音波自動疵種判別
方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an ultrasonic flaw detection method for detecting cracks or inclusions in a material to be inspected using ultrasonic waves.
【0002】[0002]
【従来の技術】鋼板等の被検査材の欠陥又は介在物の種
類を判別する従来の方法は、異なる複数の角度から、同
時又は連続的に超音波を伝播させ、これによるエコーの
振幅を、確認済みのエコー特性に基づいて評価すること
により行うものである。このエコー特性には、信号間
隔,信号継続時間等を用いている。2. Description of the Related Art A conventional method for determining the type of defects or inclusions in a material to be inspected, such as a steel plate, is to propagate ultrasonic waves simultaneously or continuously from a plurality of different angles, and to determine the amplitude of echoes by the ultrasonic waves. The evaluation is performed based on the confirmed echo characteristics. Signal intervals, signal durations, etc. are used for this echo characteristic.
【0003】[0003]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかしながら従来方法
では、1つの反射要因に対して、例えば0〜45度及び
45〜90度の少なくとも2方向から探傷を行う必要が
あり、被検査材全面を検査する場合、検査時間が長くか
かるという問題があった。本発明は、斯かる事情に鑑み
てなされたものであり、中心周波数,ピーク周波数,立
ち上がり時間,立ち下がり時間,持続時間及び波高の特
性と欠陥面積とを採取し、これら特性に基づいてニュー
ロ回路にて反射要因の種類を判別することにより、1回
の全面検査のみで判別が可能な超音波自動疵種判別方法
を提供することを目的とする。However, in the conventional method, it is necessary to perform flaw detection from at least two directions of, for example, 0 to 45 degrees and 45 to 90 degrees with respect to one reflection factor, and to inspect the entire surface of the material to be inspected. However, there is a problem that the inspection time is long. The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and collects characteristics of center frequency, peak frequency, rise time, fall time, duration, and wave height and a defect area, and based on these characteristics, a neuro circuit. It is an object of the present invention to provide an ultrasonic automatic flaw type discriminating method capable of discriminating with only one whole surface inspection by discriminating the type of the reflection factor.
【0004】[0004]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明に係る超音波自動
疵種判別方法は、超音波を使用して被検査材の表面の探
傷を実施し、欠陥,介在物等の反射要因によるエコーを
受信して、前記反射要因の種類を判別する超音波自動疵
種判別方法において、前記エコーの中心周波数,ピーク
周波数,立ち上がり時間,立ち下がり時間,持続時間及
び波高の特性と欠陥面積とを採取し、この採取した特性
を、予め反射要因毎の特性データが与えられているニュ
ーロ回路へ与えて、該ニューロ回路にて前記反射要因の
種類を判別することを特徴とする。An ultrasonic automatic flaw type determining method according to the present invention uses ultrasonic waves to perform flaw detection on the surface of a material to be inspected, and echoes due to reflection factors such as defects and inclusions. In the ultrasonic automatic flaw type discriminating method for discriminating the type of the reflection factor, the characteristics of the echo center frequency, peak frequency, rise time, fall time, duration and wave height and the defect area are collected. The collected characteristic is given to a neuro circuit to which characteristic data for each reflection factor is given in advance, and the type of the reflection factor is discriminated by the neuro circuit.
【0005】[0005]
【作用】本発明にあっては、跳ね返り超音波(エコー)
の中心周波数,ピーク周波数,立ち上がり時間,立ち下
がり時間,持続時間及び波高の特性に基づきニューロ回
路にて反射要因の種類を判別することにより、1回の全
面検査のみで正確に被検査材全面の欠陥分布とその疵種
を判別することができ、検査時間も短縮される。また疑
似エコーとの弁別も自動的に行うことができる。In the present invention, the rebounding ultrasonic wave (echo)
Based on the characteristics of center frequency, peak frequency, rise time, fall time, duration, and wave height, the neuro circuit determines the type of the reflection factor, so that only one full inspection can accurately measure the entire surface of the inspected material. The defect distribution and its defect type can be discriminated and the inspection time can be shortened. Further, discrimination from pseudo echo can be automatically performed.
【0006】[0006]
【実施例】以下、本発明をその実施例を示す図面に基づ
き具体的に説明する。図1は、本発明に係る超音波自動
疵種判別方法の実施に使用する装置の構成を示すブロッ
ク図である。図中1は鋼板等の被検査材であり、この被
検査材1に対して超音波の入射角度が固定され、被検査
材1を探傷する探触子2が設置されている。この探触子
2には走査器10及びコントローラ11が接続されており、
被検査材全面の2次元走査とその探触子位置を検出する
ようになっている。被検査材1の表面から底面まで伝搬
され、その間における反射エコーは、探触子2を介して
パルサレシーバ3にて受信されるようになしてある。パ
ルサレシーバ3にて受信された信号は、A/D変換ボー
ド4にてA/D変換され、波形特徴量有無判定回路5へ
送られて、波形特徴量の有無を判定されるようになして
ある。波形特徴量有無判定回路5では、デジタル的に波
形がS/N比を越えたか否かを判定し、波形特徴量を
‘有’又は‘無’と判定する。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be specifically described below with reference to the drawings showing the embodiments. FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a configuration of an apparatus used for carrying out an ultrasonic automatic flaw type determining method according to the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes a material to be inspected, such as a steel plate, and an incident angle of an ultrasonic wave is fixed to the material to be inspected 1 and a probe 2 for flaw detection of the material to be inspected 1 is installed. A scanner 10 and a controller 11 are connected to the probe 2,
Two-dimensional scanning of the entire surface of the material to be inspected and its probe position are detected. The echoes propagated from the surface to the bottom of the material 1 to be inspected, and the reflected echoes during that time are received by the pulsar receiver 3 via the probe 2. The signal received by the pulsar receiver 3 is A / D converted by the A / D conversion board 4 and sent to the waveform characteristic amount presence / absence determination circuit 5 so that the presence / absence of the waveform characteristic amount is determined. is there. The waveform feature amount presence / absence determination circuit 5 digitally determines whether or not the waveform exceeds the S / N ratio, and determines the waveform feature amount to be “present” or “not present”.
【0007】この波形特徴量有無判定回路5にて波形特
徴量が‘無’と判定された場合は、データは保存されな
い。一方、波形特徴量有無判定回路5にて波形特徴量が
‘有’と判定された場合は、‘有’と判定した波形の特
徴量を採取し、波形特徴量抽出回路7を起動させること
により、6種の波形特徴量を抽出する。さらに波形特徴
量抽出回路7にて規定の演算を施した後、このデータを
ニューロ回路8へ与える。If the waveform characteristic amount presence / absence determining circuit 5 determines that the waveform characteristic amount is "absent", no data is stored. On the other hand, when the waveform feature amount presence / absence determination circuit 5 determines that the waveform feature amount is “present”, the feature amount of the waveform determined as “present” is sampled and the waveform feature amount extraction circuit 7 is activated. , 6 types of waveform feature quantities are extracted. Further, after the prescribed calculation is performed in the waveform feature amount extraction circuit 7, this data is given to the neuro circuit 8.
【0008】前記コントローラ11が検出する位置信号は
信号処理装置9へ与えられ、また図示しない装置からス
タート信号,トリガ信号も与えられるようになしてあ
る。そして波形特徴量有無判定回路5にて‘有’と判定
された場合にのみ、この信号処理装置9は起動し、前述
の信号に基づいて欠陥中央部を判定する処理を行い、こ
のデータ(欠陥面積,欠陥中央位置)をニューロ回路8
へ与えるようになしてある。具体的には波形特徴量有無
判定回路5にて‘有’と判定された場合、その位置情報
及び他の5つの波形特徴量データが信号処理装置9内の
メモリに記憶される。即ち被検査材全面の2次元走査が
終了した時点ではメモリ内の情報を書き込まれた位置分
布により欠陥面積及び欠陥中心位置の判定が行え、その
位置の波形特徴量データの抽出が可能となる。ニューロ
回路8は、このデータと前記波形特徴量抽出回路7から
のデータとから疵種を判断し、この結果はディスク6に
て保存されるようになしてある。The position signal detected by the controller 11 is given to the signal processing device 9, and a start signal and a trigger signal are also given from a device (not shown). Then, only when the waveform feature quantity presence / absence determination circuit 5 determines “present”, the signal processing device 9 is activated to perform a process of determining a defect central portion based on the above-mentioned signal, and Area, defect center position) neuro circuit 8
It is designed to give to Specifically, when the waveform feature amount presence / absence determination circuit 5 determines that “present”, the position information and the other five waveform feature amount data are stored in the memory in the signal processing device 9. That is, when the two-dimensional scanning of the entire surface of the inspected material is completed, the defect area and the defect center position can be determined from the position distribution in which the information in the memory is written, and the waveform feature amount data at that position can be extracted. The neuro circuit 8 judges the flaw type from this data and the data from the waveform characteristic amount extraction circuit 7, and the result is stored in the disk 6.
【0009】上述の波形特徴量抽出回路7にて抽出され
る6種の波形特徴量を具体的に以下に挙げる。 1.ピークアンプリチュード(%) 2.立ち上がり時間(μsec.) 3.立ち下がり時間(μsec.) 4.エンベロープ長さ(μsec.) 5.ピーク周波数(MHz) 6.中心周波数(MHz)The six types of waveform feature amounts extracted by the above-mentioned waveform feature amount extraction circuit 7 will be specifically described below. 1. Peak amplitude (%) 2. Rise time (μsec.) 3. Fall time (μsec.) 4. Envelope length (μsec.) 5. Peak frequency (MHz) 6. Center frequency (MHz)
【0010】これら特徴量を以下のグラフを使用して説
明する。図2は、整流波形を、縦軸に受信信号強度、横
軸に時間を採って示すグラフである。前記「ピークアン
プリチュード」は、図2におけるピーク時の受信信号強
度である。図3は、波形エンベロープを、縦軸に受信信
号強度、横軸に時間を採って示すグラフである。前記
「立ち上がり時間」は、図3におけるa点からb点まで
の時間(b−a)であり、前記「立ち下がり時間」は、
図3におけるc点からd点までの時間(d−c)であ
る。前記「エンベロープ長さ」は、図3におけるa点か
らd点までの時間(d−a)である。These characteristic quantities will be described using the following graphs. FIG. 2 is a graph showing a rectified waveform, with the vertical axis representing the received signal strength and the horizontal axis representing time. The “peak amplitude” is the received signal strength at the peak in FIG. FIG. 3 is a graph showing a waveform envelope in which the vertical axis represents the received signal strength and the horizontal axis represents time. The “rise time” is the time (ba) from the point a to the point b in FIG. 3, and the “fall time” is
It is the time (dc) from the point c to the point d in FIG. The “envelope length” is the time (d−a) from point a to point d in FIG.
【0011】図4は、エネルギスペクトラムを、縦軸に
受信信号強度、横軸に周波数を採って示すグラフであ
る。前記「ピーク周波数」は、図4におけるg点の周波
数である。前記「中心周波数」は、f点の周波数とh点
の周波数との平均値((f+h)/2)である。FIG. 4 is a graph showing the energy spectrum, with the vertical axis representing the received signal strength and the horizontal axis representing the frequency. The “peak frequency” is the frequency at point g in FIG. The “center frequency” is an average value ((f + h) / 2) of the frequency at the point f and the frequency at the point h.
【0012】次に上述の波形特徴量の特徴について述べ
る。超音波は、固いものから柔らかいものにぶつかる
と、位相が反転するという特性を有するため、割れ性欠
陥,気泡では、立ち上がり時間(2)と立ち下がり時間
(3)とがずれる傾向がある。介在物の場合はあまり変
わらないが、アルミナ系とマンガン系とではアルミナ系
の方が変化が大きいという特徴がある。中心周波数
(6)及びピーク周波数(5)は、介在物の場合低い周
波数にて強度が高く、気泡の場合はこれより高い周波数
にて強度が高くなる。介在物の中でもマンガン系のもの
は特に低い周波数にて強度が高くなる傾向がある。Next, the features of the above-mentioned waveform feature amount will be described. The ultrasonic wave has a characteristic that the phase is inverted when the ultrasonic wave hits from a hard one to a soft one, so that the rising time (2) and the falling time (3) tend to be deviated in a cracking defect or a bubble. In the case of inclusions, it does not change much, but between alumina-based and manganese-based ones, the alumina-based one is characterized by a larger change. The center frequency (6) and the peak frequency (5) have high intensity at low frequencies in the case of inclusions, and have high intensity at higher frequencies in the case of bubbles. Among the inclusions, manganese-based inclusions tend to have high strength at particularly low frequencies.
【0013】ピーク周波数及び持続時間(4.エンベロ
ープ長さ)は、欠陥長さに影響され、アルミナ系の介在
物の場合は長くなる傾向がある。これはアルミナ系は超
音波が通り易く、波長が小さいためである。エコーの最
高波高値と欠陥信号が現れる面積とは欠陥の向き及び形
状に影響される。面状割れ性欠陥は、面積が小さく、エ
コーの周波数高さは高い。また介在物は、面積が大き
く、エコーの周波数高さは低いという特徴がある。ピー
クアンプリチュード(1)は、欠陥面積及び形状に影響
され、平面状欠陥で高くなるという特徴がある。The peak frequency and duration (4. envelope length) are affected by the defect length and tend to be longer in the case of alumina-based inclusions. This is because the alumina system allows ultrasonic waves to pass easily and has a small wavelength. The highest peak value of the echo and the area where the defect signal appears are influenced by the direction and shape of the defect. The planar cracking defect has a small area and a high echo frequency height. In addition, the inclusions are characterized by a large area and a low echo frequency height. The peak amplitude (1) is influenced by the defect area and shape, and has a feature that it becomes higher for planar defects.
【0014】これらのうち1つの情報で疵種を判定する
ことは困難であるため、以上の如き情報に基づいて検査
データをニューロ回路8にて総合的に学習,判断するこ
とにより、疵種を判定する。Since it is difficult to determine the defect type with one of these pieces of information, the defect type is comprehensively learned and judged by the neuro circuit 8 based on the above information. judge.
【0015】本発明方法を使用し、異なる3種類の欠陥
(Al2 O3 ,MnO2 ,割れ等)を判別した結果、疵
種的中率は80%であり、サンプル数は40であった。
また上述の介在物及び気泡を存在させて判別を行った結
果、疵種的中率は90%であり、サンプル数は50であ
った。このように本発明方法によると1角度からの測定
により正確に疵種を判別することが可能である。As a result of distinguishing three different kinds of defects (Al 2 O 3 , MnO 2 , cracks, etc.) by using the method of the present invention, the flaw-predictive ratio was 80% and the number of samples was 40. .
Moreover, as a result of making the above-described inclusions and bubbles, the result was that the flaw-predictive value was 90% and the number of samples was 50. Thus, according to the method of the present invention, it is possible to accurately determine the flaw type by measuring from one angle.
【0016】[0016]
【発明の効果】以上のように本発明に係る超音波自動疵
種判別方法は、中心周波数,ピーク周波数,立ち上がり
時間,立ち下がり時間,持続時間及び波高のエコー特性
に基づきニューロ回路にて反射要因の種類を判別するこ
とにより、1回の全面検査のみで速やかに、且つ正確に
疵種を判別することができる等、本発明は優れた効果を
奏する。As described above, according to the ultrasonic flaw detection method of the present invention, the reflection factor in the neuro circuit is based on the echo characteristics of the center frequency, peak frequency, rise time, fall time, duration and wave height. By discriminating the type, the present invention has an excellent effect such that the flaw type can be promptly and accurately discriminated by only one whole surface inspection.
【図1】本発明に係る超音波自動疵種判別方法の実施に
使用する装置構成を示すブロック図である。FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing the configuration of an apparatus used for carrying out an ultrasonic automatic flaw type determination method according to the present invention.
【図2】整流波形を示すグラフである。FIG. 2 is a graph showing a rectified waveform.
【図3】波形エンベロープを示すグラフである。FIG. 3 is a graph showing a waveform envelope.
【図4】エネルギスペクトラムを示すグラフである。FIG. 4 is a graph showing an energy spectrum.
1 被検査材 2 探触子 3 パルサレシーバ 4 A/D変換ボード 5 波形特徴量有無判定回路 6 ディスク 7 波形特徴量抽出回路 8 ニューロ回路 9 信号処理装置 10 走査器 11 コントローラ 1 material to be inspected 2 probe 3 pulser receiver 4 A / D conversion board 5 waveform feature quantity presence / absence judgment circuit 6 disk 7 waveform feature quantity extraction circuit 8 neuro circuit 9 signal processing device 10 scanner 11 controller
Claims (1)
を実施し、割れ,介在物等の反射要因による反射エコー
を受信して、前記反射要因の種類を判別する超音波自動
疵種判別方法において、前記エコーの中心周波数,ピー
ク周波数,立ち上がり時間,立ち下がり時間,持続時間
及び波高の特性と欠陥面積とを採取し、この採取した特
性を、予め反射要因毎の特性データが与えられているニ
ューロ回路へ与えて、該ニューロ回路にて前記反射要因
の種類を判別することを特徴とする超音波自動疵種判別
方法。1. An automatic ultrasonic flaw for determining the type of the reflection factor by performing flaw detection on the surface of the material to be inspected using ultrasonic waves and receiving a reflection echo caused by a reflection factor such as a crack or inclusion. In the species discriminating method, characteristics of the center frequency, peak frequency, rising time, falling time, duration, and wave height of the echo and the defect area are sampled, and the sampled characteristics are given in advance by characteristic data for each reflection factor. An automatic ultrasonic flaw type discriminating method, characterized in that the type of the reflection factor is discriminated by applying it to a given neuro circuit.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5171117A JPH075155A (en) | 1993-06-16 | 1993-06-16 | Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5171117A JPH075155A (en) | 1993-06-16 | 1993-06-16 | Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH075155A true JPH075155A (en) | 1995-01-10 |
Family
ID=15917297
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP5171117A Pending JPH075155A (en) | 1993-06-16 | 1993-06-16 | Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH075155A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004177168A (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2004-06-24 | Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd | Evaluation method for inclusion detection in steel by water immersion ultrasonic testing |
| JP2009541765A (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2009-11-26 | ヴイ・アンド・エム・フランス | Non-destructive inspection for pipes, especially during production or in the finished state |
| WO2022234957A1 (en) * | 2021-05-03 | 2022-11-10 | 한국표준과학연구원 | Non-destructive ultrasonic testing method and system using deep learning, and autoencoder-based prediction model learning method used therein |
-
1993
- 1993-06-16 JP JP5171117A patent/JPH075155A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004177168A (en) * | 2002-11-25 | 2004-06-24 | Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd | Evaluation method for inclusion detection in steel by water immersion ultrasonic testing |
| JP2009541765A (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2009-11-26 | ヴイ・アンド・エム・フランス | Non-destructive inspection for pipes, especially during production or in the finished state |
| WO2022234957A1 (en) * | 2021-05-03 | 2022-11-10 | 한국표준과학연구원 | Non-destructive ultrasonic testing method and system using deep learning, and autoencoder-based prediction model learning method used therein |
| US12241870B2 (en) | 2021-05-03 | 2025-03-04 | Korea Research Institute Of Standards And Science | Ultrasonic non-destructive test method and system using deep learning, and auto-encoder-based prediction model training method used therefor |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US4265119A (en) | Ultrasonic method of inspecting spot welds | |
| JP3535417B2 (en) | Ultrasonic defect height measuring device and defect height measuring method | |
| CN110988127B (en) | Signal identification method for detecting defects on surface and near surface of round bar by rotary ultrasonic | |
| JPH063305A (en) | Method for non-destructively inspecting piezo-electric element for micro-crack | |
| JPH11118775A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection equipment | |
| JPH075155A (en) | Ultrasonic automatic flaw type identification method | |
| JPH09171005A (en) | Defect type determination method by ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| CN113557429B (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method, ultrasonic flaw detection device, steel manufacturing equipment, steel manufacturing method, and steel quality management method | |
| RU2191376C2 (en) | Method measuring sizes of defects in process of ultrasonic inspection of articles | |
| US4380929A (en) | Method and apparatus for ultrasonic detection of near-surface discontinuities | |
| JPH09138222A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection of cast or rolled steel | |
| JPS6229023B2 (en) | ||
| RU2472143C1 (en) | Method of ultrasound control | |
| JP3473435B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method and ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus | |
| RU2662464C1 (en) | Method for ultrasonic inspection | |
| KR100485450B1 (en) | Ultrasonic testing apparatus and control method therefor | |
| Berens et al. | The sample size and flaw size effects in NDI reliability experiments | |
| JP3831285B2 (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus and ultrasonic flaw detection method | |
| JPH0875709A (en) | Method and device for identifying defect type by ultrasonic flaw detection | |
| JP2001004602A (en) | Ultrasonic flaw detection method and apparatus | |
| JP2000097919A (en) | Ultrasonic testing | |
| JPH05232092A (en) | Ultrasonic inspection equipment | |
| Zahran et al. | Automatic classification of defects in time-of-flight diffraction data | |
| JPH0266446A (en) | Method for inspecting surface defect | |
| SU1061709A3 (en) | Method for identifying nature of flaws in ultrasonic flaw detection |