JPH0815608B2 - Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill - Google Patents

Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill

Info

Publication number
JPH0815608B2
JPH0815608B2 JP63316772A JP31677288A JPH0815608B2 JP H0815608 B2 JPH0815608 B2 JP H0815608B2 JP 63316772 A JP63316772 A JP 63316772A JP 31677288 A JP31677288 A JP 31677288A JP H0815608 B2 JPH0815608 B2 JP H0815608B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
control
plate thickness
steel strip
strip
thickness
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP63316772A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH02165807A (en
Inventor
英輔 河澄
Original Assignee
川崎製鉄株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 川崎製鉄株式会社 filed Critical 川崎製鉄株式会社
Priority to JP63316772A priority Critical patent/JPH0815608B2/en
Publication of JPH02165807A publication Critical patent/JPH02165807A/en
Publication of JPH0815608B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0815608B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention 【産業上の利用分野】[Industrial applications]

本発明は、鋼帯の圧延機における板厚制御方法に係
り、更に詳しくは、圧延機を用いた鋼帯の圧延に際し
て、該鋼帯の厚さを測定する板厚計から送出される板厚
偏差信号に基づき圧下装置を操作して前記鋼帯の厚さを
フイードバツク制御する板厚制御方法に関する。
The present invention relates to a plate thickness control method in a steel strip rolling mill, and more specifically, in rolling a steel strip using a rolling mill, a plate thickness sent from a plate thickness gauge for measuring the thickness of the steel strip. The present invention relates to a plate thickness control method for operating a reduction device based on a deviation signal to control the thickness of the steel strip by feedback.

【従来の技術】[Prior art]

従来、鋼帯の圧延機における板厚制御は、第7図に示
すような方法で行なわれていた。即ち、第7図におい
て、鋼帯10の出側に設置された板厚計12で鋼帯10の厚さ
を測定し、該板厚計12から送出される板厚偏差信号Δh
に基づき比例・積分制御回路14で比例・積分制御を行な
い、該制御回路14から送出される指令信号ΔSで圧下装
置16を操作して圧延ロール18a、18bの位置を変化させ、
究極的に鋼帯10の板厚をフイードバツク制御するように
していた。 しかし、第7図のような従来例においては、圧延ロー
ル18cの直下(即ち、圧延ロール18b、18cが鋼帯10を押
圧する部分の中立点)から板厚計12まで一定の距離があ
るため、その間の鋼帯移送時間が無駄時間となつてい
た。又、このような無駄時間があるため、上記比例・積
分制御を開始してから、鋼帯10が目標の板厚となるまで
一定の時間を要し、この時間中に圧延される鋼帯10の板
厚がオフゲージ(板厚外れ)になるという問題があつ
た。しかし、上下無駄時間が制御系の応答に及ぼす上述
のような悪い影響は、特に、鋼帯10を低速で圧延すると
きに顕著に現われていた。 一方、上述のような無駄時間の制御系への影響を回避
し制御系の応答性を改善するため、第8図に示すような
スミス補償法による制御も試みられていた(O.J.M.Smit
h:A Controller to Overcome Dead Time,ISA J.,6−2,2
8/33(1959)参照)。即ち、スミス補償法による制御の
ゲインをC、BISRA−AGC(自動厚み制御)のチユーニン
グ率をα、ミル定数をM、圧延材(鋼帯10)の塑性定数
をQ、圧延ロール18b、18cと板厚計12の間の鋼帯移送時
間をTL、比例制御のゲインをKP、積分制御のゲインを
KI、比例項の一次遅れ時定数をT、ロードセル20によつ
て検出される圧延荷重をP、圧延荷重設定値をP0、圧延
ロール18b、18c間のギヤツプ設定値をS0とするとき、ス
ミス補償法による制御の構成は第8図のようになり、板
厚計12で鋼帯10の板厚偏差Δhが検出されてから圧下装
置16を指令信号ΔSが制御するまでの遅れを予め見込ん
で一定の補正を加えることによつて、リアルタイムな板
厚制御を行なうようになつている。 然し乍ら、上記スミス補償法による制御には次のよう
な問題が存在していた。 即ち、第1に、スミス補償法において使用されるミル
定数Mは実測可能であるが、圧延材の塑性定数Qは、材
料によつて異なるにも拘らず圧延時に実測するのが不可
能なため、推定値を用いざるを得ない。しかし、この推
定値が塑性定数Qの実際の値と必ずしも一致せず、両者
の差(即ち、塑性定数Qの誤差)が存在すると、スミス
補償法による制御の誤差を招き、前記比例・積分制御の
場合よりも板厚精度に大きな誤差を生じさせるという問
題があつた。 第2に、第8図における圧延ロール18b、18cの直下か
ら板厚計12までの鋼帯移送時間TLは下式(1)から求め
られるが、鋼帯10の移送速度(板速)を実測しない限
り、先進率fを実測するのは不可能であり、推定値を用
いざるを得ない。 TL=L/V(1+f) …(1) ここで、Lは圧延ロール18b、18cと板厚計12の間の距
離、Vは圧延ロールの周速、fは先進率である。 しかしながら、圧延速度が変化すると、鋼帯10と圧延
ロール18b、18cの間の摩擦係数が変化し、これに応じて
先進率fが変化する。このため、先進率fの推定値が実
際の値と必ずしも一致せず、両者の差(即ち、先進率f
の誤差)がそのまま制御の誤差を招くという問題もあつ
た。
Conventionally, strip thickness control in a steel strip rolling mill has been performed by the method shown in FIG. That is, in FIG. 7, the thickness of the steel strip 10 is measured by the strip thickness gauge 12 installed on the outlet side of the steel strip 10 and the strip thickness deviation signal Δh sent from the strip thickness gauge 12 is measured.
Based on the proportional / integral control circuit 14, proportional / integral control is performed, and the commanding device ΔS sent from the control circuit 14 operates the reduction device 16 to change the positions of the rolling rolls 18a, 18b.
Ultimately, the strip thickness of the steel strip 10 was controlled by feedback. However, in the conventional example as shown in FIG. 7, there is a certain distance from immediately below the rolling roll 18c (that is, the neutral point where the rolling rolls 18b and 18c press the steel strip 10) to the plate thickness gauge 12. During that time, the steel strip transfer time was wasted. Further, since there is such a dead time, it takes a certain time from the start of the proportional / integral control until the steel strip 10 reaches the target plate thickness, and the steel strip 10 rolled during this time There was a problem that the thickness of the plate became an off gauge (out of plate thickness). However, the above-described adverse effect on the response of the control system on the up and down dead time was remarkable especially when the steel strip 10 was rolled at a low speed. On the other hand, in order to avoid the influence of the dead time on the control system and improve the responsiveness of the control system, control by the Smith compensation method as shown in Fig. 8 has also been attempted (OJMSmit
h: A Controller to Overcome Dead Time, ISA J., 6−2,2
See 8/33 (1959)). That is, the gain of control by the Smith compensation method is C, the tuning rate of BISRA-AGC (automatic thickness control) is α, the mill constant is M, the plastic constant of the rolled material (steel strip 10) is Q, and the rolling rolls 18b and 18c. The steel strip transfer time between the plate thickness gauges 12 is T L , the gain of proportional control is K P , the gain of integral control is
When K I , T is the first-order lag time constant of the proportional term, P is the rolling load detected by the load cell 20, P 0 is the rolling load setting value, and S 0 is the gear setting value between the rolling rolls 18b and 18c. The configuration of the control by the Smith compensation method is as shown in FIG. The thickness is controlled in real time by making a certain correction in consideration. However, the control by the Smith compensation method has the following problems. That is, first, the mill constant M used in the Smith compensation method can be measured, but the plastic constant Q of the rolled material cannot be measured during rolling although it varies depending on the material. , I have no choice but to use the estimated value. However, if this estimated value does not always match the actual value of the plasticity constant Q and there is a difference between them (that is, an error in the plasticity constant Q), an error in the control by the Smith compensation method is caused, and the proportional / integral control is performed. However, there is a problem in that the plate thickness accuracy has a larger error than in the case of. Secondly, the steel strip transfer time T L from immediately below the rolling rolls 18b and 18c to the plate thickness gauge 12 in FIG. 8 is obtained from the following equation (1). Unless the actual measurement is made, it is impossible to actually measure the advanced rate f, and the estimated value must be used. T L = L / V (1 + f) (1) Here, L is the distance between the rolling rolls 18b and 18c and the plate thickness gauge 12, V is the peripheral speed of the rolling roll, and f is the advance rate. However, when the rolling speed changes, the friction coefficient between the steel strip 10 and the rolling rolls 18b and 18c changes, and the advance rate f changes accordingly. Therefore, the estimated value of the advanced rate f does not always match the actual value, and the difference between them (ie, the advanced rate f
There is also a problem that the error) directly causes a control error.

【発明が達成しようとする課題】[Problems to be achieved by the invention]

本発明は、かかる従来例の問題に鑑みてなされたもの
であり、その課題は、圧延機を用いて鋼帯の圧延を行な
うに際して、応答が早く且つ安定的に板厚を制御できる
ような板厚制御方法を提供することにある。
The present invention has been made in view of the problems of the conventional example, and its object is to provide a plate having a fast response and stable plate thickness control when rolling a steel strip using a rolling mill. It is to provide a thickness control method.

【課題を解決するための手段】[Means for Solving the Problems]

本発明は、圧延機を用いた鋼帯の圧延に際し、該鋼帯
の厚さを測定する板厚計から送出される板厚偏差信号に
基づき圧下装置を操作して前記鋼帯の厚さをフイードバ
ツク制御する板厚制御方法において、前記板厚偏差が予
め設定された上下限値を越えたときはスミス補償法によ
る制御を行ない、前記板厚偏差が前記上限値と下限値の
間にあるときは比例・積分制御を行なうことにより、前
記課題を解決したものである。
The present invention, when rolling a steel strip using a rolling mill, operates a reduction device based on a strip thickness deviation signal sent from a strip thickness gauge for measuring the thickness of the strip to adjust the thickness of the strip. In the plate thickness control method of controlling the feed back, when the plate thickness deviation exceeds a preset upper and lower limit value, the control by the Smith compensation method is performed, and when the plate thickness deviation is between the upper limit value and the lower limit value. Solves the above problem by performing proportional / integral control.

【作用】[Action]

本発明は、鋼帯の圧延に際して板厚偏差の上下限値を
予め設定しておき、板厚偏差が上限値より大きい値とな
つたり、下限値より小さい値となつた場合は、スミス補
償法による制御を行なつて、上記上下限値内に板厚を早
期に修正すると共に、前記板厚偏差が上記上下限値内の
値となつた場合は比例・積分制御を行なつて、板厚の安
定した制御を行なうものである。 即ち、鋼帯の圧延機における板厚制御方法において、
スミス補償法による制御の方が比例・積分制御よりも応
答が速いことに着目し、板厚計で検出される鋼帯の板厚
偏差が予め設定された上下限値を越えた場合はスミス補
償法による制御を行ない、該板厚偏差が上下限値内に入
つている場合には比例・積分制御を行なうことにより応
答が早くしかも安定的に板厚制御を行なう。
The present invention sets the upper and lower limit values of the plate thickness deviation in rolling the steel strip in advance, and when the plate thickness deviation is a value larger than the upper limit value or a value smaller than the lower limit value, the Smith compensation method The plate thickness is corrected early within the upper and lower limits, and when the thickness deviation is within the upper and lower limits, proportional and integral control is performed to control the plate thickness. Is a stable control. That is, in the strip thickness control method in the steel strip rolling mill,
Focusing on the fact that the control by the Smith compensation method has a faster response than the proportional / integral control, if the sheet thickness deviation of the steel strip detected by the thickness gauge exceeds the preset upper and lower limits, Smith compensation is performed. If the plate thickness deviation is within the upper and lower limit values, proportional / integral control is performed to quickly and stably control the plate thickness.

【実施例】【Example】

以下、本発明の実施例について図を用いて詳しく説明
する。 第1図は、本発明の実施例を説明するための構成説明
図である。 この図において、板厚計12をセンサとして含む、例え
ばDDC(Direct Digital Control)のような板厚制御装
置(装置の外形は図示せず)内に、比例・積分制御回路
14とスミス補償法制御回路20が並列的に設けられると共
に、板厚計12から送出される板厚偏差信号Δhを受けて
板厚偏差の判定を行なう判定回路22が設けられている。 該判定回路22の出力によつてスイツチ回路24a、24bの
いずれか一方がオンとされ、比例・積分制御回路14若し
くはスミス補償法制御回路20の出力ΔSが圧下装置16に
送出されるようになつている。 第2図及び第3図は、上記判定回路22のロジツクを示
す論理回路図及びその動作説明図である。 この図において、第1図の板厚計12から送出された板
厚偏差Δhの値が予め設定される上々限値ΔhU1と下々
限値ΔhL1の間の値となつている場合は、上記板厚偏差
Δhにより、論理積回路100の一方(図の上方)に入力
される論理信号が高レベルとなり、後述の論理積回路10
6の出力が反転された信号との間で論理積演算され、そ
の後、比例・積分制御を行うための回路108(更に詳し
くは第1図のスイツチ回路24a)に送出されて比例・積
分制御を行なわせる。ここで、スミス補償法による制御
を行わせるための論理積回路106の出力の否定との論理
積をとつているのは、第3図に示した如く、板厚偏差Δ
hが上々限値ΔhU1と下々限値ΔhL1の間の値であつて
も、スミス補償法による制御を実行中であれば、これを
優先してヒステリシスを持たせ、制御の切換えが過度に
頻繁に行われるのを防止するためである。 一方、上記板厚偏差Δhの値が上々限値ΔhU1より大
きい値となつている場合、又は、下々限値ΔhL1より小
さい値となつている場合には、板厚偏差Δhにより、論
理和回路102に入力される論理信号のいずれか一方が高
レベルとなり、該論理和回路102の出力が論理回路104に
入力されて、後述の論理積回路106の出力が反転された
信号との間で論理和演算される。これによつて、板厚偏
差Δhが上々限値ΔhU1より大きいか、下々限値ΔhL1よ
り小さい場合には、比例・積分制御の実行中の如何を問
わず、スミス補償法による制御への切換えが行われる。 更に、板厚偏差Δhの値が上限値hU2と下限値hL2の間
の値となつている場合は、板厚偏差Δhにより、論理積
回路106の一方(図の下方)に反転入力される論理信号
が低レベルとなり、上記論理和回路104の出力との間で
論理積演算される。この論理積回路106の出力は論理和
回路104に入力されると共に、論理積回路100に反転入力
され、且つ、スミス補償法による制御を行うための回路
110(更に詳しくは第1図のスイツチ回路24b)に送出さ
れてスミス補償法による制御を行なわせる。 即ち、第2図を用いて詳述した第1図の判定回路22
は、制御開始時に比例・積分制御回路108に比例・積分
制御を行なわせ、鋼帯10の板厚偏差Δhが上々限値ΔhU
1より大きい値となつたり下々限値ΔhL1より小さい値と
なつた場合、スミス補償法制御回路110に切換えてスミ
ス補償法制御を行なわせる。又、このようなスミス補償
法制御によつて鋼帯10の板厚偏差Δhが上限値ΔhU2と
下限値ΔhL2の間に入ると、再び比例・積分制御回路108
に切換えて比例・積分制御を行なわせる。 上述のような実施例において、第1図の板厚計12から
送出される板厚偏差Δhにステツプ状の外乱を与えた場
合、比例・積分制御回路14による比例・積分制御のステ
ツプ反答は例えば第4図のようになり、スミス補償法制
御回路20によるスミス補償法制御のステツプ応答は例え
ば第5図のようになる。この第4図と第5図を比較すれ
ば明らかなように、スミス補償法による制御の方が比例
・積分制御よりも応答が速いことが分る。従つて、本実
施例のように、鋼帯10の板厚偏差Δhが上限値ΔhU2
(ΔhU1)より大きい値となつたとき(若しくは下限値
ΔhL2(ΔhL1)より小さい値となつたとき)に、比例・
積分制御からスミス補償法制御に切換えれば、比例・積
分制御単独の場合よりも応答性が向上し、第6図に示す
如く、全体を通じて制御の応答性が早く且つ安定的とな
ることがわかる。
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a configuration explanatory view for explaining an embodiment of the present invention. In this figure, a proportional / integral control circuit is included in a plate thickness control device (not shown in the drawing) such as a DDC (Direct Digital Control), which includes a plate thickness gauge 12 as a sensor.
14 and a Smith compensation method control circuit 20 are provided in parallel, and a determination circuit 22 that determines the thickness deviation by receiving the thickness deviation signal Δh sent from the thickness gauge 12 is provided. One of the switch circuits 24a and 24b is turned on by the output of the judgment circuit 22, and the output ΔS of the proportional / integral control circuit 14 or the Smith compensation method control circuit 20 is sent to the reduction device 16. ing. 2 and 3 are a logic circuit diagram showing the logic of the decision circuit 22 and an operation explanatory diagram thereof. In this figure, when the value of the thickness deviation Δh sent from the thickness gauge 12 in FIG. 1 is a value between the upper limit value Δh U 1 and the lower limit value Δh L 1 which are set in advance. Is caused by the plate thickness deviation Δh, the logic signal input to one of the AND circuits 100 (upper part of the figure) becomes high level, and the AND circuit 10 described later
The output of 6 is ANDed with the inverted signal, and then sent to the circuit 108 for performing proportional / integral control (more specifically, the switch circuit 24a in FIG. 1) to perform the proportional / integral control. Let me do it. Here, the logical product of the output of the AND circuit 106 and the negation of the output for performing the control by the Smith compensation method is taken as shown in FIG.
Even if h is a value between the upper limit value Δh U 1 and the lower limit value Δh L 1, if control by the Smith compensation method is being executed, this is prioritized to have hysteresis and control is switched. This is because it is prevented from being performed too frequently. On the other hand, when the value of the plate thickness deviation Δh is larger than the upper limit value Δh U 1 or smaller than the lower limit value Δh L 1, the plate thickness deviation Δh , One of the logical signals input to the logical sum circuit 102 becomes high level, the output of the logical sum circuit 102 is input to the logical circuit 104, and the output of the logical product circuit 106 to be described later is inverted. The logical sum operation is performed between. As a result, when the plate thickness deviation Δh is larger than the upper limit value Δh U 1 or smaller than the lower limit value Δh L 1, the Smith compensation method is used regardless of whether proportional / integral control is being executed. Switching to control is performed. Further, when the value of the plate thickness deviation Δh is a value between the upper limit value h U 2 and the lower limit value h L 2, it is inverted to one of the AND circuits 106 (downward in the figure) due to the plate thickness deviation Δh. The input logic signal becomes low level, and the logical product operation is performed with the output of the OR circuit 104. The output of the logical product circuit 106 is input to the logical sum circuit 104 and inverted to the logical product circuit 100, and is a circuit for performing control by the Smith compensation method.
110 (more specifically, the switch circuit 24b in FIG. 1) is sent to control by the Smith compensation method. That is, the determination circuit 22 of FIG. 1 described in detail with reference to FIG.
Causes the proportional / integral control circuit 108 to perform proportional / integral control at the start of control, and the plate thickness deviation Δh of the steel strip 10 is the upper limit value Δh U.
When the value is larger than 1 or smaller than the lower limit value Δh L 1, the Smith compensation method control circuit 110 is switched to perform Smith compensation method control. Further, when the plate thickness deviation Δh of the steel strip 10 falls between the upper limit value Δh U 2 and the lower limit value Δh L 2 by such Smith compensation method control, the proportional / integral control circuit 108 again.
To switch to proportional / integral control. In the embodiment as described above, when step-like disturbance is applied to the plate thickness deviation Δh sent from the plate thickness gauge 12 of FIG. 1, the step counter answer of the proportional / integral control by the proportional / integral control circuit 14 is For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the step response of Smith compensation method control by the Smith compensation method control circuit 20 becomes as shown in FIG. 5, for example. As is clear from the comparison between FIGS. 4 and 5, it can be seen that the control by the Smith compensation method has a faster response than the proportional / integral control. Therefore, as in the present embodiment, the plate thickness deviation Δh of the steel strip 10 is the upper limit value Δh U 2
When the value is larger than (Δh U 1) (or smaller than the lower limit value Δh L 2 (Δh L 1)), proportional
It can be seen that when the integral control is switched to the Smith compensation method control, the responsiveness is improved as compared with the case of the proportional / integral control alone, and as shown in FIG. 6, the responsiveness of the control is fast and stable throughout. .

【発明の効果】【The invention's effect】

以上詳しく説明したような本発明によれば、板厚偏差
に予め上下限値を設定しておき、実測された板厚偏差が
該上下限値の範囲外となつたときはスミス補償法による
制御を行なつて早急に板厚を修正し、該板厚偏差が上下
限値の範囲内に入ると比例・積分制御を行なつて安定し
た板厚制御を行なうような構成であるため、圧延機を用
いて鋼帯の圧延を行なうに際し、応答が早く且つ安定的
に板厚を制御できるようになる。 ちなみに、本発明を完全連続式冷間タンデム圧延機の
第1スタンドに適用したところ、走間板厚変更後の早期
オンゲージ化が可能となり、Δ5m/コイル程度のオフゲ
ージ減少を達成することができた。 又、本発明をバツチ式冷間タンデム圧延機の第1スタ
ンドに適用したところ、コイル先後端の低速圧延部のオ
フゲージ発生を防止することによつて、Δ13m/コイル程
度のオフゲージ減少を達成することができた。
According to the present invention as described in detail above, upper and lower limit values are set in advance for the plate thickness deviation, and when the measured plate thickness deviation falls outside the range of the upper and lower limit values, control by the Smith compensation method is performed. The thickness of the rolling mill is corrected promptly, and when the thickness deviation falls within the upper and lower limits, proportional and integral control is performed to perform stable thickness control. When the steel strip is rolled by using, the plate thickness can be controlled quickly and stably. By the way, when the present invention was applied to the first stand of the complete continuous cold tandem rolling mill, it was possible to achieve an early on-gauge after changing the running plate thickness, and to achieve an off-gauge reduction of about Δ5 m / coil. . Further, when the present invention is applied to the first stand of a batch type cold tandem rolling mill, it is possible to achieve an off gauge reduction of about Δ13 m / coil by preventing the occurrence of off gauge in the low speed rolling section at the coil front and rear ends. I was able to.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

第1図は、本発明の実施例を説明するための構成説明
図、 第2図は、板厚計から送出される板厚偏差信号を判定す
る判定回路のロジツクを示す論理回路図、 第3図は、前記判定回路の動作説明図、 第4図は、従来の比例・積分制御のステツプ応答の例を
示す線図、 第5図は、スミス補償法による制御のステツプ応答の例
を示す線図、 第6図は、本発明の実施例による板厚制御のステツプ応
答の例を示す線図、 第7図は、板厚制御の従来例を説明するための構成説明
図、 第8図は、スミス補償法による制御を説明するための構
成説明図である。 10…鋼帯、12…板厚計、14…比例・積分制御回路、16…
圧下装置、18a〜18d…圧延ロール、20…スミス補償法制
御回路、22…判定回路、24a、24b…スイツチ回路。
FIG. 1 is a configuration explanatory view for explaining an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a logic circuit diagram showing a logic of a judging circuit for judging a plate thickness deviation signal sent from a plate thickness gauge, and FIG. FIG. 4 is a diagram for explaining the operation of the judgment circuit, FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of step response of conventional proportional / integral control, and FIG. 5 is a line showing an example of step response of control by the Smith compensation method. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of step response of plate thickness control according to the embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 7 is a configuration explanatory view for explaining a conventional example of plate thickness control, and FIG. FIG. 6 is a configuration explanatory view for explaining control by the Smith compensation method. 10 ... Steel strip, 12 ... Plate thickness gauge, 14 ... Proportional / integral control circuit, 16 ...
Rolling down device, 18a to 18d ... Rolling roll, 20 ... Smith compensation method control circuit, 22 ... Judgment circuit, 24a, 24b ... Switch circuit.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】圧延機を用いた鋼帯の圧延に際し、該鋼帯
の厚さを測定する板厚計から送出される板厚偏差信号に
基づき圧下装置を操作して前記鋼帯の厚さをフイードバ
ツク制御する板厚制御方法において、 前記板厚偏差が予め設定された上下限値を越えたときは
スミス補償法による制御を行ない、 前記板厚偏差が前記上限値と下限値の間にあるときは比
例・積分制御を行なうことを特徴とする鋼帯の圧延機に
おける板厚制御方法。
1. When rolling a steel strip using a rolling mill, the reduction device is operated based on a strip thickness deviation signal sent from a strip thickness gauge for measuring the thickness of the strip, and the thickness of the strip is controlled. In the plate thickness control method for controlling the feed back, when the plate thickness deviation exceeds a preset upper and lower limit value, control is performed by a Smith compensation method, and the plate thickness deviation is between the upper limit value and the lower limit value. A plate thickness control method in a steel strip rolling machine characterized by performing proportional / integral control at times.
JP63316772A 1988-12-15 1988-12-15 Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill Expired - Lifetime JPH0815608B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63316772A JPH0815608B2 (en) 1988-12-15 1988-12-15 Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP63316772A JPH0815608B2 (en) 1988-12-15 1988-12-15 Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH02165807A JPH02165807A (en) 1990-06-26
JPH0815608B2 true JPH0815608B2 (en) 1996-02-21

Family

ID=18080750

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP63316772A Expired - Lifetime JPH0815608B2 (en) 1988-12-15 1988-12-15 Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0815608B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115990615A (en) * 2021-10-20 2023-04-21 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Roller press control method, device and roll press machine

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5705083B2 (en) * 2011-10-06 2015-04-22 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Thickness control method of rolling mill
CN116550765B (en) * 2023-05-12 2026-04-21 北京冶自欧博科技发展有限公司 A high-precision, fast-response thickness control method for hot strip mills

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
計測自動制御学会論文集、19[3(昭58−3)渡部、伊藤、PP.187−192

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115990615A (en) * 2021-10-20 2023-04-21 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Roller press control method, device and roll press machine
WO2023066093A1 (en) * 2021-10-20 2023-04-27 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Control method and apparatus for roller press, and roller press
CN115990615B (en) * 2021-10-20 2024-04-05 宁德时代新能源科技股份有限公司 Control method and device of roller press and roller press

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH02165807A (en) 1990-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10780474B2 (en) Robust band tension control
JPH0815608B2 (en) Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill
JPH038843B2 (en)
KR20020004801A (en) Method of controlling board thickness, calculating passing schedule, and board thickness controller for continuous rolling machine
US4220025A (en) Feed forward automatic thickness controlling method
JPS5852724B2 (en) Metal rolling machine and setting method
JPH0815607B2 (en) Plate thickness control method for steel strip rolling mill
US3709008A (en) Gauge control method and apparatus for metal rolling mills
JPH0236321B2 (en) KINZOKUSEIMUZENBERUTONOSEIZOHOHO
JP2653128B2 (en) Control method of cold tandem rolling mill
JPH01186208A (en) Automatic plate thickness control device for rolling mill
JPH0246284B2 (en)
JPS59183917A (en) Gage meter type automatic controlling method of plate thickness
JPS6133703A (en) Rolling method of thick plate
SU1287964A1 (en) Apparatus for automatic compensation of equipment wear in rolling
SU733753A1 (en) System for automatic control of strip thickness in continuous hot rolling mill
JPH05285519A (en) Tension control method between stands in continuous rolling
JPH0211205A (en) Method for controlling plate thickness in hot rolling mill
JPH0736923B2 (en) Non-interference control method of strip thickness and shape in multi-high rolling mill
JPS62289307A (en) Sheet width controlling method in rolling mill
JPH0237245B2 (en)
GB1077855A (en) Rolling mills
JPS6251684B2 (en)
JPH0130565B2 (en)
JPH0261850B2 (en)