JPH0826817A - Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick - Google Patents

Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick

Info

Publication number
JPH0826817A
JPH0826817A JP5320992A JP32099293A JPH0826817A JP H0826817 A JPH0826817 A JP H0826817A JP 5320992 A JP5320992 A JP 5320992A JP 32099293 A JP32099293 A JP 32099293A JP H0826817 A JPH0826817 A JP H0826817A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
raw material
magnesia
refractory brick
carbonaceous
based raw
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
JP5320992A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hiroki Yanagi
弘来 柳
Mitsuhiro Omae
満宏 大前
Shinji Yamamoto
真司 山本
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Harima Ceramic Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Harima Ceramic Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Harima Ceramic Co Ltd filed Critical Harima Ceramic Co Ltd
Priority to JP5320992A priority Critical patent/JPH0826817A/en
Publication of JPH0826817A publication Critical patent/JPH0826817A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Compositions Of Oxide Ceramics (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE:To produce a lining refractory brick for a molten steel ladle or a secondary refining container which is one of steel manufacturing process apparatuses. CONSTITUTION:This magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick comprises a blending composition consisting essentially of 10-25wt.% alumina-based raw material, 5-20wt.% carbonaceous raw material, 2-10wt.% silicon carbide-based raw material, 1-5wt.% metallic powder and the remainder of magnesia-based raw material. The magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick is capable of relaxing the expanding stress by using the magnesia-based raw material, alumina-based raw material, carbonaceous raw material, silicon carbide-based raw material and metallic powder in the blending ratio. Thereby, joint fusion loss is prevented. Since other various properties are also excellent, the furnace life is improved.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】Detailed Description of the Invention

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、製鋼プロセス装置の一
つである溶鋼取鍋および二次精錬容器などの内張用耐火
れんがに関するものである。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a refractory brick for lining such as a molten steel ladle and a secondary refining vessel, which is one of steelmaking process equipment.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、溶鋼取鍋や二次精錬容器などの内
張用耐火れんがはマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがが使用さ
れている。マグネシア炭素質耐火れんがが溶鋼取鍋や二
次精錬容器などの内張用耐火れんがとして使用された場
合、目地部の先行溶損が発生する傾向がある。この目地
部の先行溶損の原因は、れんがの膨張応力によるセリ割
れと推定される。この膨張応力を緩和するために、リン
酸塩、硼酸塩、珪酸塩などの各種塩類、ガラス、フリッ
トなどの低融点物質を添加した場合、目地部の先行溶損
は改善できたとしても、れんがの熱間強度の低下によっ
て耐食性が悪化し、耐用性が向上しない。
BACKGROUND ART Conventionally, magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks have been used as refractory bricks for linings such as molten steel ladle and secondary refining vessel. When magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks are used as refractory bricks for linings such as molten steel ladle and secondary refining vessel, there is a tendency that preceding melting damage of joints occurs. It is presumed that the cause of the preceding erosion of the joint is the cracking of the cell due to the expansion stress of the brick. If various salts such as phosphates, borates, silicates, glass, and low-melting substances such as frits are added to alleviate this expansion stress, even if the preceding erosion damage at the joints can be improved, Corrosion resistance is deteriorated due to the decrease in hot strength and the durability is not improved.

【0003】また、ドロマイトを添加したマグネシア−
ドロマイト−炭素質耐火れんがも考えられている。この
場合でも目地部の先行溶損は改善できるが、使用中に大
気中の水分を吸収し消化反応を起こしやすく不安定であ
る。れんがの熱間強度の低下の問題を解決するものとし
て、マグネシア炭素質耐火れんがにAl、Si、Mg、
Al−Mgなどの金属粉を添加する例が、特開昭58−
185475号公報や特開昭58−190868号公報
にみられる。
Also, magnesia containing dolomite
Dolomite-carbonaceous refractory brick is also considered. Even in this case, the preceding erosion of joints can be improved, but during use, it is unstable because it absorbs moisture in the atmosphere to cause a digestive reaction. As a solution to the problem of deterioration in hot strength of bricks, magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks containing Al, Si, Mg,
An example of adding a metal powder such as Al-Mg is disclosed in JP-A-58-58.
185475 and Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 58-190868.

【0004】[0004]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、れんがの熱間
強度を向上させるためには有効であるが、耐熱スポーリ
ング性の低下を伴うので、目地部の先行溶損の問題は依
然として存在している。れんがの溶損の形態は溶鋼と接
する稼働面の全体が溶損されるのではなく、れんがの目
地近辺の溶損が大きい。つまり、れんがの膨張応力によ
って、先ずれんがの目地コーナーの欠けが発生する。そ
の後、溶鋼の落下衝撃などによってこの欠け部分が発達
するものである。目地溶損の部分の寸法が寿命判定基準
に達すると、他所のれんが寸法がいかに大きくてもそれ
以上使用できないという問題がある。それ故、寿命向上
による炉材コスト低減のためには、目地部の先行溶損を
改善する製品の開発が要望されている。
However, although it is effective for improving the hot strength of bricks, it causes a decrease in heat-resistant spalling property, so that the problem of pre-melting of joints still exists. There is. Regarding the form of brick meltdown, not the entire operating surface in contact with the molten steel is melted down, but the meltdown near the joint of the brick is large. That is, due to the expansion stress of the brick, chipping of the joint corner of the brick occurs first. After that, the chipped portion develops due to the drop impact of the molten steel. When the size of the joint melt loss portion reaches the life criterion, there is a problem that it cannot be used any more, no matter how large the size of the brick elsewhere. Therefore, in order to reduce the cost of the furnace material by improving the life, it is required to develop a product that improves the preceding melting loss of the joint portion.

【0005】[0005]

【課題を解決するための手段】そこで本発明者らは、実
炉使用後のれんがの損傷原因の究明、オフライン試験、
実炉での確認試験を通じ、目地溶損の主原因であるれん
がの膨張応力を緩和し、しかも膨張性、耐酸化性、耐熱
スポーリング性等で優れた性状を有する製品の開発に努
めた。そして、マグネシア質原料、アルミナ質原料、炭
素質原料、炭化珪素質原料、金属粉を特定の配合割合で
使用することにより、れんがの膨張応力を緩和し、しか
もその他の諸性質が優れた製品が得られた。この製品を
実機試験の結果、目地溶損の改善が実証され、本発明を
完成するに至ったものである。
Therefore, the inventors of the present invention have investigated the cause of damage to bricks after use in an actual furnace, conducted an offline test,
Through the confirmation test in an actual furnace, we tried to develop a product that alleviates the expansion stress of brick, which is the main cause of joint melting loss, and has excellent properties such as expandability, oxidation resistance, and heat spalling resistance. And, by using magnesia raw material, alumina raw material, carbonaceous raw material, silicon carbide raw material, and metal powder in a specific mixing ratio, the expansion stress of the brick is relaxed, and a product having other various properties is excellent. Was obtained. As a result of an actual machine test of this product, improvement of joint melt loss was verified, and the present invention was completed.

【0006】すなわち本発明は、アルミナ質原料:10
〜25wt%、炭素質原料:5〜20wt%、炭化珪素
質原料:2〜10wt%、金属粉:1〜5wt%、残部
がマグネシア質原料を主材とする配合組成よりなるマグ
ネシア炭素質耐火れんがである。本発明は、溶鋼取鍋や
二次精錬容器などの内張用耐火れんがの目地先行溶損を
改善するため、れんがの耐食性を損なうことなしに応力
破壊を防止しようとするものである。
That is, according to the present invention, the alumina raw material: 10
-25 wt%, carbonaceous raw material: 5 to 20 wt%, silicon carbide raw material: 2 to 10 wt%, metal powder: 1 to 5 wt%, the balance is a magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick having a blending composition mainly composed of a magnesia raw material Is. The present invention is intended to prevent stress fracture without impairing the corrosion resistance of bricks, in order to improve the joint preceding melting loss of refractory bricks for lining such as molten steel ladle and secondary refining vessel.

【0007】以下、本発明をさらに詳しく説明する。本
発明で使用できるマグネシア質原料の種類は特に限定す
るものではないが、人工の電融マグネシア、焼結マグネ
シアなど公知のものである。粒径は従来のマグネシア炭
素質耐火れんがと同様、密充填組織が得られるように粗
粒、中粒、微粒に調整する。配合割合は好ましくは40
〜80wt%とする。マグネシア質原料は、高融点、高
密度な骨材であり、40wt%未満では、十分な耐食性
が得られない。また、80wt%を超えると、膨張率が
高くなり耐熱スポーリング性が低下するため目地溶損が
大きくなりいずれも好ましくない。
Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail. The type of magnesia raw material that can be used in the present invention is not particularly limited, but known ones such as artificial electrofused magnesia and sintered magnesia are known. The particle size is adjusted to coarse particles, medium particles, and fine particles so that a close-packed structure can be obtained, similar to conventional magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks. Mixing ratio is preferably 40
˜80 wt%. The magnesia raw material is an aggregate having a high melting point and a high density, and if it is less than 40 wt%, sufficient corrosion resistance cannot be obtained. On the other hand, if it exceeds 80 wt%, the expansion rate becomes high and the heat-resistant spalling property is lowered, so that the joint melt loss becomes large, which is not preferable.

【0008】アルミナ質原料は一般の電融アルミナ、焼
結アルミナを主として使用する。粒径は特に限定するも
のではないが、使用中にマグネシア質原料とスピネル鉱
物を生成しやすくするために1mm以下の細粒を用いる
のが好ましい。配合割合は10〜25wt%とする。1
0wt%未満では、残存膨張率が不足し使用中に目地開
きを発生する。また、25wt%を超えると、耐食性が
低下するためである。
As the alumina raw material, general fused alumina and sintered alumina are mainly used. The particle size is not particularly limited, but it is preferable to use fine particles of 1 mm or less in order to facilitate generation of the magnesia raw material and spinel mineral during use. The mixing ratio is 10 to 25 wt%. 1
If it is less than 0% by weight, the residual expansion rate is insufficient and the joint is opened during use. Further, if it exceeds 25 wt%, the corrosion resistance is lowered.

【0009】炭素質原料の具体的な種類は、鱗状黒鉛、
土状黒鉛、人造黒鉛、コークス、カーボンブラック、仮
焼無煙炭、電極屑などから選ばれる一種または二種以上
であり、高温における耐食性の点から黒鉛の高純度のも
のを使用するのが好ましい。炭素質原料は溶鋼、スラグ
の浸透を防止し耐食性を向上させる。また、耐熱スポー
リング性を向上させるという特徴をもつ。配合割合は5
〜20wt%とする。5wt%未満では、熱間強度、耐
食性は問題ないが、膨張率の低下が十分でなく、その結
果、耐熱スポーリング性が不十分となる。また、20w
t%を超えると溶鋼による摩耗が増大し、耐食性が著し
く低下するためである。
Specific types of carbonaceous raw materials include scaly graphite,
It is one or more selected from earth-like graphite, artificial graphite, coke, carbon black, calcined anthracite, electrode scrap, and the like, and it is preferable to use a high-purity graphite from the viewpoint of corrosion resistance at high temperatures. The carbonaceous raw material prevents penetration of molten steel and slag and improves corrosion resistance. It also has the feature of improving the heat resistant spalling property. Mixing ratio is 5
˜20 wt%. If it is less than 5% by weight, hot strength and corrosion resistance are satisfactory, but the expansion coefficient is not sufficiently reduced, and as a result, the heat-resistant spalling property is insufficient. Also, 20w
This is because if it exceeds t%, wear due to molten steel increases and corrosion resistance remarkably decreases.

【0010】炭化珪素質原料は公知の合成品が使用で
き、SiC含有量は90%以上のものを使用するのが好
ましい。炭化珪素質原料に含まれる不純物の主成分はフ
リーのシリカ(SiO2)であり、これが変態膨張を生
じ、耐熱スポーリング性が低下するからである。炭化珪
素質原料は酸化防止、耐食性改善に効果があり、さらに
膨張応力の緩和に顕著な効果を発揮する。これらの効果
の理由については、SiC自体の低膨張性とMgO−A
23−SiC系の反応による生成物の効果によるもの
と考えられる。配合割合は2〜10wt%とする。2w
t%未満では、酸化、溶損が大きくなり、さらに膨張応
力が大きくなる。また、10wt%を超えると、耐食性
が低下するからである。
A known synthetic material can be used as the silicon carbide raw material, and it is preferable to use one having a SiC content of 90% or more. This is because the main component of impurities contained in the silicon carbide based material is free silica (SiO 2 ), which causes transformation expansion and deteriorates the heat resistant spalling property. The silicon carbide material is effective in preventing oxidation and improving corrosion resistance, and also exerts a remarkable effect in relaxing expansion stress. The reason for these effects is that the low expansion of SiC itself and MgO-A
It is considered that this is due to the effect of the product of the reaction of the l 2 O 3 —SiC system. The blending ratio is 2 to 10 wt%. 2w
If it is less than t%, oxidation and melting loss increase, and the expansion stress also increases. Also, if it exceeds 10 wt%, the corrosion resistance is reduced.

【0011】本発明のマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは、
以上の原料の他に金属粉を1〜5wt%含む。金属粉の
具体的な種類は、Al、Si、Mg、Cr、Feなどの
金属粉またはその合金粉などから選ばれる一種または二
種以上である。金属粉が1wt%未満では、熱間強度や
耐酸化性向上の効果が不十分である。また、金属粉が5
wt%を超えると、耐熱スポーリング性が低下する。ま
た、使用中の炭化物生成により消化現象を起こしやすく
なり、れんがの品質が不安定になるからである。
The magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick of the present invention comprises
In addition to the above raw materials, it contains 1 to 5 wt% of metal powder. The specific type of the metal powder is one kind or two or more kinds selected from metal powders such as Al, Si, Mg, Cr and Fe or alloy powders thereof. If the metal powder is less than 1 wt%, the effect of improving the hot strength and the oxidation resistance is insufficient. Also, the metal powder is 5
If it exceeds wt%, the heat-resistant spalling property is deteriorated. In addition, the generation of charcoal during use tends to cause a digestion phenomenon, resulting in unstable brick quality.

【0012】マグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは以上の原料
の他に、本発明の効果を損なわない範囲で、SiO2
ZrO2、Cr23、Fe23、TiO2、CaO、Si
34、BN、金属ファイバー、セラミックファイバー、
カーボンファイバーなどのファイバー類、ガラス類など
を適当量添加することも可能である。
In addition to the above raw materials, magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks may be made of SiO 2 , as long as the effect of the present invention is not impaired.
ZrO 2 , Cr 2 O 3 , Fe 2 O 3 , TiO 2 , CaO, Si
3 N 4 , BN, metal fiber, ceramic fiber,
It is also possible to add an appropriate amount of fibers such as carbon fiber and glass.

【0013】マグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは以上の配合
物を混練、成形、加熱という通常の工程によって得られ
る。混練には通常用いられているフェノール樹脂、フラ
ン樹脂、ピッチ、タール、CMC、MC、PVAなどの
有機結合剤、または珪酸ソーダ、硫酸アルミニウム、リ
グニンススルフォン酸塩、硫酸マグネシウム、リン酸塩
などの無機結合剤を配合物全体に対する外掛けで2〜5
wt%添加できる。成形はれんがの用途、既存の製造設
備などに合わせて例えば、オイルプレス、フリクション
プレスなどを用いて行う。成形後は例えば、200〜6
00℃で加熱する。この加熱処理によって、れんがは初
期における結合剤からの発煙や臭気を防止されるととも
に、結合剤の効果により成形体の強度を付与する。必要
によっては1000℃前後で還元焼成することもでき
る。
The magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick can be obtained by the usual steps of kneading, molding and heating the above-mentioned compounds. For kneading, organic binders such as phenol resin, furan resin, pitch, tar, CMC, MC, PVA, or sodium silicate, aluminum sulfate, lignin sulfonate, magnesium sulfate, phosphate, etc. Inorganic binder is 2 to 5 on the whole composition
wt% can be added. The molding is performed by using, for example, an oil press or a friction press according to the purpose of the brick and the existing manufacturing equipment. After molding, for example, 200-6
Heat at 00 ° C. By this heat treatment, the brick prevents smoke and odor from the binder in the initial stage, and imparts the strength of the molded body by the effect of the binder. If necessary, reduction firing can be performed at about 1000 ° C.

【0014】[0014]

【作用】本発明のマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは、マグ
ネシア−アルミナ−炭化珪素−炭素−金属の各原料の総
合作用効果において目的の目地損傷のない耐用性に優れ
た耐火れんがをもたらすもので、各原料の主な作用効果
は次のようになる。マグネシアは高耐火度と高耐食性を
有し主要構成成分である。炭素は溶鋼、スラグなどの浸
透防止と耐熱スポーリング性の改善に寄与している。金
属粉は強度発現、酸化防止、耐食性向上に寄与してい
る。これらのマグネシア−炭素−金属系については、従
来のマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがにおける作用と同じで
ある。このマグネシア−炭素−金属系にアルミナを添加
すると、残存膨張性の発現により加熱−冷却において発
生する目地開きが軽減され目地損傷を防止している。炭
化珪素は膨張率が小さいことと、マグネシア−アルミナ
−炭化珪素−炭素−金属の反応生成物によって膨張応力
を著しく下げる働きがある。さらに、酸化防止、耐食性
向上にも寄与し、目地損傷を防止する。
The magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick of the present invention provides a refractory brick excellent in durability with no joint damage in the combined action effect of each raw material of magnesia-alumina-silicon carbide-carbon-metal. The main effects of the raw materials are as follows. Magnesia is a main constituent with high fire resistance and high corrosion resistance. Carbon contributes to preventing penetration of molten steel, slag, etc. and improving heat-resistant spalling resistance. The metal powder contributes to strength development, antioxidation, and improvement of corrosion resistance. For these magnesia-carbon-metal systems, the action is the same as for conventional magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks. When alumina is added to the magnesia-carbon-metal system, the residual expansivity is developed to reduce the joint opening that occurs during heating and cooling, thus preventing joint damage. Silicon carbide has a small expansion coefficient and has a function of remarkably reducing the expansion stress by the reaction product of magnesia-alumina-silicon carbide-carbon-metal. Further, it also contributes to the prevention of oxidation and the improvement of corrosion resistance and prevents joint damage.

【0015】[0015]

【実施例】以下に本発明実施例とその比較例を示す。表
1は、本発明実施例、比較例およびその試験結果であ
る。
EXAMPLES Examples of the present invention and comparative examples will be shown below. Table 1 shows examples of the present invention, comparative examples and test results thereof.

【0016】[0016]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0017】各例は、いずれも表に示す配合物に結合剤
としてフェノール樹脂を外掛けで5wt%添加しニーダ
ーで混練した後、フリクションプレスを用い1000k
g/cm2の加圧力で並型に成形した。その後、300
℃で24時間加熱処理し、冷却したものを供試体とし
た。こうして得られた供試体を使用し、表中の化学分
析、品質、熱間強度、残存膨張率、耐食性、耐酸化性、
耐熱スポーリング性について試験を行った。
In each of the examples, 5 wt% of a phenol resin was added as a binder to the composition shown in the table, and the mixture was kneaded with a kneader.
It was molded in a normal shape with a pressing force of g / cm 2 . Then 300
What was heat-processed at 24 degreeC for 24 hours, and what was cooled was made into the sample. Using the specimens thus obtained, chemical analysis in the table, quality, hot strength, residual expansion coefficient, corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance,
A test was performed for heat resistant spalling.

【0018】化学分析;JIS R2212−55によ
った。 見掛気孔率、嵩比重;JIS R2205−74によっ
た。 熱間強度;電気炉中で1400℃の条件で、3点曲げテ
ストにより熱間曲げ強さを測定した。 残存膨張率;電気炉中で1500℃×10Hr、150
0℃×20Hrの熱処理後の値である。ただし、供試体
は酸化防止のため、コークスブリーズを詰めたサヤ中に
入れて熱処理を行った。 耐食性;回転侵食法を用い、その溶損寸法(mm)を測
定した。 なお、耐食性の試験は、以下の条件で行った。 温度および時間:1650℃×200分、 侵食剤:鋼80%+転炉スラグ(CaO/SiO2=3.0,Total
・Fe=15%)20%、 耐酸化性;供試体から切り出した一辺50mmの立方体
のテストピースを1500℃×10Hrで酸化焼成を行
った。その後、テストピースを切断し、白くなった部分
(酸化した部分)の寸法を測定した。 耐熱スポーリング性;供試体を1650℃の溶鋼に5分
間浸漬し、15分間空冷する処理を1サイクルとし、1
0サイクル行い切損発生回数を測定した。10サイクル
処理後でも切損は発生しないものは10サイクルを超え
たという意味で、試験結果は10+で表した。 熱間膨張応力;供試体から切り出した50mm×50m
m×200mmのテストピースを電気炉内に横に置き、
テストピースの両端を固定する。そして1600℃まで
昇温し、昇温時の膨張応力をロードセルで検出する方法
を用いた。
Chemical analysis: According to JIS R2212-55. Apparent porosity, bulk specific gravity; according to JIS R2205-74. Hot strength: Hot bending strength was measured by a three-point bending test in an electric furnace at 1400 ° C. Residual expansion rate; 1500 ° C x 10 hours, 150 in electric furnace
It is a value after heat treatment at 0 ° C. × 20 Hr. However, in order to prevent oxidation, the test piece was heat-treated by putting it in a sheath filled with coke breeze. Corrosion resistance: The rotational erosion method was used to measure the erosion size (mm). The corrosion resistance test was conducted under the following conditions. Temperature and time: 1650 ° C × 200 minutes, erosion agent: steel 80% + converter slag (CaO / SiO 2 = 3.0, Total
-Fe = 15%) 20%, oxidation resistance; A cubic test piece cut out from the test piece and having a side of 50 mm was subjected to oxidation firing at 1500 ° C x 10 hours. Then, the test piece was cut, and the dimensions of the whitened portion (oxidized portion) were measured. Heat-resistant spalling resistance: A test piece is immersed in molten steel at 1650 ° C. for 5 minutes and air-cooled for 15 minutes, which is defined as 1 cycle, and 1
The number of occurrences of cut loss was measured by performing 0 cycles. The test result was expressed as 10+, meaning that the number of cuts that did not occur after 10 cycles exceeded 10 cycles. Hot expansion stress; 50mm × 50m cut from the specimen
Place the m × 200mm test piece in the electric furnace sideways,
Fix both ends of the test piece. Then, the method was used in which the temperature was raised to 1600 ° C. and the expansion stress at the time of temperature rise was detected with a load cell.

【0019】表1の実施例と比較例を比較すればわかる
ように、実施例では、熱間強度、耐食性、耐酸化性、耐
熱スポーリング性の全ての性質に優れていることが明ら
かである。比較例1は実施例1の炭化珪素質原料を除去
した場合であり、溶損量、酸化量が増加している。さら
に、図1に示すように比較例1は膨張応力が増大するの
で好ましくない。比較例2は金属粉の添加量が0.5w
t%と少ない場合で、熱間強度、溶損量、酸化量の全て
において実施例2に比べ明らかに劣っている。比較例3
はアルミナ質原料の配合割合が過剰の例であり、溶損量
が増加している。比較例4は炭素質原料の配合割合が過
少の例であり、耐熱スポーリング性が著しく低下してい
るのがわかる。比較例5はアルミナ質原料の配合割合が
過少の例であり、残存膨張率が最低である。また、表に
示すように1500℃×10Hr以降の膨張が全くない
のがわかる。比較例6は炭化珪素質原料の配合割合が過
剰の例であり、熱間強度が低下し、溶損量が増加してい
る。
As can be seen from the comparison between the examples of Table 1 and the comparative examples, it is clear that the examples are excellent in all properties of hot strength, corrosion resistance, oxidation resistance, and heat spalling resistance. . Comparative Example 1 is a case where the silicon carbide based material of Example 1 was removed, and the melting loss amount and the oxidation amount increased. Furthermore, as shown in FIG. 1, Comparative Example 1 is not preferable because the expansion stress increases. In Comparative Example 2, the amount of metal powder added is 0.5 w
When it is as small as t%, all of the hot strength, the amount of melting loss, and the amount of oxidation are clearly inferior to those of Example 2. Comparative Example 3
Is an example in which the mixing ratio of the alumina raw material is excessive, and the amount of erosion is increasing. Comparative Example 4 is an example in which the mixing ratio of the carbonaceous raw material is too small, and it can be seen that the heat resistant spalling property is remarkably lowered. Comparative Example 5 is an example in which the mixing ratio of the alumina raw material is too small, and the residual expansion coefficient is the lowest. Further, as shown in the table, it can be seen that there is no expansion after 1500 ° C. × 10 Hr. Comparative Example 6 is an example in which the blending ratio of the silicon carbide based material is excessive, the hot strength is lowered, and the amount of melting loss is increased.

【0020】図1は表1の実施例1、実施例2、比較例
1、比較例3の膨張応力の測定結果を示したものであ
る。比較例1は応力値が異常に大きい。これは炭化珪素
質原料を使用していないためである。また、比較例3は
膨張応力は低いが、耐食性が劣るので好ましくない。こ
れに対し、実施例1、実施例2は膨張応力が安定してお
り、熱間強度、耐食性、耐熱スポーリング性などの諸性
質に優れている。
FIG. 1 shows the measurement results of the expansion stress of Example 1, Example 2, Comparative Example 1 and Comparative Example 3 in Table 1. Comparative Example 1 has an abnormally large stress value. This is because no silicon carbide based material is used. Further, Comparative Example 3 has a low expansion stress, but is inferior in corrosion resistance, which is not preferable. On the other hand, Examples 1 and 2 have stable expansion stress and are excellent in various properties such as hot strength, corrosion resistance, and heat spalling resistance.

【0021】実機試験;前記実施例の項で示したのとほ
ぼ同様の方法で実機形状に製造したマグネシア炭素質耐
火れんがのうち、実施例1、実施例2、比較例1につい
て、実際に100t溶鋼取鍋の側壁鋼浴部に築造し、溶
鋼温度1610℃、溶鋼滞留時間100分の条件で稼働
した。実施例1、実施例2、比較例1の寿命は、それぞ
れ105ch、94ch、71chであった。それに関
連して、れんが間の目地の開き幅・深さは、8mm・1
0mm、13mm・13mm、45mm・40mmであ
った。上述のように、実施例1、実施例2と比較例1の
寿命差は、目地部の溶損差によることが明瞭であった。
築造部位は受鋼時の溶鋼衝撃により損耗が激しい部位で
ある。この結果からも明らかなように、本発明より得ら
れたマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは、実炉においても目
地溶損の改善が顕著であり十分な効果を発揮した。
Actual machine test: Among the magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks manufactured in the actual machine shape by a method substantially similar to that described in the above-mentioned Example, Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 were actually 100 t. It was built in the side wall steel bath of the molten steel ladle, and operated under the conditions of molten steel temperature of 1610 ° C. and molten steel residence time of 100 minutes. The lifetimes of Example 1, Example 2, and Comparative Example 1 were 105 ch, 94 ch, and 71 ch, respectively. In relation to it, the opening width and depth of the joint between the bricks is 8 mm.
It was 0 mm, 13 mm · 13 mm, 45 mm · 40 mm. As described above, it was clear that the difference in life between Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1 was due to the difference in melting loss of the joints.
The building part is a part that is heavily worn by the impact of molten steel when receiving steel. As is clear from this result, the magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick obtained according to the present invention showed a remarkable improvement in joint melting loss even in an actual furnace and exhibited a sufficient effect.

【0022】[0022]

【発明の効果】本発明によるマグネシア炭素質耐火れん
がは、前記の試験結果からも明らかなように、熱間強
度、耐食性、耐熱スポーリング性に優れている。その上
従来からの問題点であった目地溶損が改善され、炉寿命
が約30%向上し、炉材費引下げに貢献しておりその経
済的効果は大きい。
The magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick according to the present invention is excellent in hot strength, corrosion resistance and heat spalling resistance, as is clear from the above test results. Moreover, joint melting loss, which has been a problem in the past, has been improved, the life of the furnace has been improved by about 30%, and the cost of the furnace material has been reduced.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of drawings]

【図1】図1は熱間膨張応力曲線で、温度と膨張応力の
関係を示す。
FIG. 1 is a hot expansion stress curve showing the relationship between temperature and expansion stress.

─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
─────────────────────────────────────────────────── ───

【手続補正書】[Procedure amendment]

【提出日】平成6年5月23日[Submission date] May 23, 1994

【手続補正1】[Procedure Amendment 1]

【補正対象書類名】明細書[Document name to be amended] Statement

【補正対象項目名】0021[Correction target item name] 0021

【補正方法】変更[Correction method] Change

【補正内容】[Correction content]

【0021】実機試験;前記実施例の項で示したのとほ
ぼ同様の方法で実機形状に製造したマグネシア炭素質耐
火れんがのうち、実施例1、実施例2、比較例1につい
て、実際に100t溶鋼取鍋の側壁鋼浴部に築造し、溶
鋼温度1610℃、溶鋼滞留時間100分の条件で稼働
した。実施例1、実施例2、比較例1の寿命は、それぞ
れ105ch、94ch、71chであった。それに関
連して、れんが間の目地の開き幅・深さは、8mm・1
0mm、13mm・13mm、45mm・40mmであ
った。上述のように、実施例1、実施例2と比較例1の
寿命差は、目地部の溶損差によることが明瞭であった。
さらに実施例1、実施例2、比較例1に使用したれんが
を同一溶鋼取鍋の側壁スラグライン部に築造し同一条件
で稼働した。実施例1、実施例2、比較例1の寿命は、
それぞれ110ch、118ch、72chであった。
それに関連して、れんが間の目地の開き幅・深さは、1
0mm・12mm、7mm・9mm、55mm・51m
mであった。れんが表面は目地溶損が無く滑らかで、そ
の結果スラグライン部においても大巾な寿命延長を可能
にした。築造部位は受鋼時の溶鋼衝撃により損耗が激し
い部位である。この結果からも明らかなように、本発明
より得られたマグネシア炭素質耐火れんがは、実炉にお
いても目地溶損の改善が顕著であり十分な効果を発揮し
た。
Actual machine test: Among the magnesia carbonaceous refractory bricks manufactured in the actual machine shape by a method substantially similar to that described in the above-mentioned Example, Example 1, Example 2 and Comparative Example 1 were actually 100 t. It was built in the side wall steel bath of the molten steel ladle, and operated under the conditions of molten steel temperature of 1610 ° C. and molten steel residence time of 100 minutes. The lifetimes of Example 1, Example 2, and Comparative Example 1 were 105 ch, 94 ch, and 71 ch, respectively. In relation to it, the opening width and depth of the joint between the bricks is 8 mm.
It was 0 mm, 13 mm · 13 mm, 45 mm · 40 mm. As described above, it was clear that the difference in life between Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1 was due to the difference in melting loss of the joints.
Furthermore, the bricks used in Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1
Were built on the side wall slag line of the same molten steel ladle under the same conditions.
Started in. The lives of Examples 1, 2 and Comparative Example 1 are
They were 110 ch, 118 ch, and 72 ch, respectively.
In relation to it, the opening width and depth of the joint between bricks is 1
0 mm / 12 mm, 7 mm / 9 mm, 55 mm / 51 m
It was m. The surface of the brick is smooth, with no joint melting and
As a result, it is possible to greatly extend the life of the slag line.
I chose The building part is a part that is heavily worn by the impact of molten steel when receiving steel. As is clear from this result, the magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick obtained according to the present invention showed a remarkable improvement in joint melting loss even in an actual furnace, and exhibited a sufficient effect.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 【請求項1】 アルミナ質原料:10〜25wt%、炭
素質原料:5〜20wt%、炭化珪素質原料:2〜10
wt%、金属粉:1〜5wt%、残部がマグネシア質原
料を主材とする配合組成よりなるマグネシア炭素質耐火
れんが。
1. Alumina raw material: 10 to 25 wt%, carbonaceous raw material: 5 to 20 wt%, silicon carbide raw material: 2 to 10
wt%, metal powder: 1 to 5 wt%, the remainder is a magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick having a blending composition whose main component is a magnesia raw material.
JP5320992A 1993-11-26 1993-11-26 Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick Pending JPH0826817A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP5320992A JPH0826817A (en) 1993-11-26 1993-11-26 Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP5320992A JPH0826817A (en) 1993-11-26 1993-11-26 Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH0826817A true JPH0826817A (en) 1996-01-30

Family

ID=18127576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP5320992A Pending JPH0826817A (en) 1993-11-26 1993-11-26 Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0826817A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100308249B1 (en) * 1998-12-21 2002-07-27 주식회사 포스렉 Refractory for Furnace Tap Hole Support
JP2012122131A (en) * 2010-11-15 2012-06-28 Jfe Steel Corp Refractory-lining structure of iron-making vessel
JP2023102168A (en) * 2022-01-11 2023-07-24 黒崎播磨株式会社 Manufacturing method of unfired brick for hot metal container

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100308249B1 (en) * 1998-12-21 2002-07-27 주식회사 포스렉 Refractory for Furnace Tap Hole Support
JP2012122131A (en) * 2010-11-15 2012-06-28 Jfe Steel Corp Refractory-lining structure of iron-making vessel
JP2023102168A (en) * 2022-01-11 2023-07-24 黒崎播磨株式会社 Manufacturing method of unfired brick for hot metal container

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0476112B1 (en) Magnesite-carbon refractories
US5318933A (en) Carbon-containing carbon bonded refractories with improved physical properties
US5506181A (en) Refractory for use in casting operations
JP7557328B2 (en) Manufacturing method of mag-carbon bricks for LF pots
JP2020100511A (en) Method of producing magnesia-carbon brick
JPH09202667A (en) Castable refractory for slide gate
JP6361705B2 (en) Lining method of converter charging wall
JPH0826817A (en) Magnesia carbonaceous refractory brick
JP2556416B2 (en) Casting material for blast furnace gutter
JPH06298564A (en) Carbonaceous magnesia fire brick
JP4187183B2 (en) Magnesia-carbon brick
JP7736519B2 (en) Manufacturing method and use method of bricks for vacuum degassing equipment
JP4695354B2 (en) Carbon-containing refractory brick
US3262794A (en) Basic fused refractories
JP3703104B2 (en) Magnesia-chromic unfired brick
JP3336187B2 (en) MgO-CaO carbon-containing refractory
JPH0412065A (en) Double structure refractory
JPS62260768A (en) Refractories for blast furnace basin
JP2000335980A (en) Graphite-containing amorphous refractories
JPH0912375A (en) Insulated refractory lining of molten metal container
JP2024098867A (en) Manufacturing method of magnesia carbon bricks
JP3002296B2 (en) Method for producing coarse aggregate blended magnesia-carbon refractory
JP2024059450A (en) Manufacturing method of magnesia carbon bricks for vacuum degassing furnace
Dzermejko Carbonaceous refractories
JP2026047793A (en) Slag line bricks for stainless steel ladles