JPS5939012A - Core of stationary electric induction apparatus - Google Patents
Core of stationary electric induction apparatusInfo
- Publication number
- JPS5939012A JPS5939012A JP14873882A JP14873882A JPS5939012A JP S5939012 A JPS5939012 A JP S5939012A JP 14873882 A JP14873882 A JP 14873882A JP 14873882 A JP14873882 A JP 14873882A JP S5939012 A JPS5939012 A JP S5939012A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- cut
- core
- iron core
- thin
- stationary induction
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01F—MAGNETS; INDUCTANCES; TRANSFORMERS; SELECTION OF MATERIALS FOR THEIR MAGNETIC PROPERTIES
- H01F27/00—Details of transformers or inductances, in general
- H01F27/24—Magnetic cores
- H01F27/245—Magnetic cores made from sheets, e.g. grain-oriented
- H01F27/2455—Magnetic cores made from sheets, e.g. grain-oriented using bent laminations
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Coils Of Transformers For General Uses (AREA)
Abstract
(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.
Description
【発明の詳細な説明】
本発明は静止誘導電器の鉄心に係り、特に金属薄板を複
数回巻回した鉄心で、その少なくとも1個所にカット部
を有する静止誘導電器の鉄心に関するものである。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to an iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance, and more particularly to an iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance, which is an iron core made of a plurality of turns of a thin metal plate, and has a cut portion at at least one of the cores.
金属薄板例えば磁性金属薄帯の一つであるアモルファス
磁性合金は損失がけい素鋼板の1/3以下であることか
ら、変圧器の低損失化に有望で第1図から第6図に示さ
れているように変圧器鉄心に用いるだめの研究開発が行
なわれている。巻回した鉄心すなわち巻鉄心を用いた変
圧器の製作は、巻鉄心を製作した後巻線を巻き絶縁物を
用いて固定する所謂ノーカット方式と、巻鉄心1を製作
後その一部を切断し、その切断部分すなわちカット部2
から巻線3を挿入し、絶縁物4で固定する所謂カットコ
ア方式(第1図参照)とがある。この巻鉄心1の1ケ所
にカット部2を設けるカットコア方式において、けい素
鋼板のような比較的厚い金属帯ではカット部2で十分よ
い磁気的接合を得るようにすることは比較的簡単である
。しかしこの極薄のアモルファス磁性合金からなる磁性
金属薄帯のような金属薄板では、カット部2の良好な磁
気的接合を得ることが困難で、接合部が僅かにずれたり
、接合部に僅かに空隙ができだりして、損失が大きく変
化することが判った。このようなカットコア方式におけ
るカットの方法にはカット部2を直線的に形成する方法
(第2図参照)、磁性金属−薄帯を1枚ずつ所定間隔で
ずらして斜めに形成する方法(以下、バット接合方法と
称する、第3図参照)およびステップ状に形成する方法
(以下、ステップラップ方法と称する、第4図参照)等
がある。Metal thin sheets, such as amorphous magnetic alloys, which are a type of magnetic metal thin strip, have a loss that is less than 1/3 that of silicon steel sheets, so they are promising for reducing loss in transformers and are shown in Figures 1 to 6. As shown in the figure, research and development is being carried out on dams for use in transformer cores. There are two methods for producing a transformer using a wound core, that is, a wound core.The so-called no-cut method involves manufacturing the wound core and then wrapping the windings and fixing them using an insulator. , its cut portion, that is, cut portion 2
There is a so-called cut core method (see FIG. 1) in which the winding 3 is inserted from the inside and fixed with an insulator 4. In this cut core method in which the cut portion 2 is provided at one location on the wound core 1, it is relatively easy to obtain a sufficiently good magnetic bond at the cut portion 2 for a relatively thick metal strip such as a silicon steel plate. be. However, with thin metal plates such as magnetic metal ribbons made of ultra-thin amorphous magnetic alloy, it is difficult to obtain good magnetic bonding at the cut portion 2, and the bonded portion may be slightly misaligned or the bonded portion may be slightly damaged. It was found that the loss changes greatly due to the formation of voids. Cutting methods in such a cut core method include a method in which the cut portion 2 is formed linearly (see Figure 2), and a method in which the cut portion 2 is formed diagonally by shifting each magnetic metal ribbon at a predetermined interval (see below). , a butt bonding method (see FIG. 3) and a step-forming method (hereinafter referred to as a step-wrap method, see FIG. 4).
ところで極薄の磁性金属薄帯を用いて巻鉄心1を製作す
る場合に、前述のようにけい素鋼板等とは異なりカット
部2が僅かではあるがずれることがある(第5図参照)
が、これは主にカット部2を直線的に形成する方法とノ
(ット接合方法とに多く、ステップラップ方法では比較
的少ない。このバット接合方法(第”5図参照)では積
層部の上。By the way, when manufacturing the wound core 1 using an ultra-thin magnetic metal ribbon, the cut portion 2 may be slightly misaligned (see Fig. 5), unlike silicon steel plates, etc., as described above.
However, this problem mainly occurs in the method of forming the cut part 2 linearly and the knot joining method, and is relatively rare in the step lap method.In this butt joining method (see Figure 5), the laminated part Up.
下部ともずれることがあるが、多くは上部だけとか下部
だけであム例えば下部を揃えて組立てると上部にずれが
生じるが、それは磁性金属薄帯が非常に薄いだめである
。すなわち磁性金属薄帯が非常に薄いので僅かな締圧の
差によりずれが生じ、このずれによって鉄損が次に述べ
るように変化する。Sometimes the lower part is misaligned, but most often only the upper part or the lower part is. For example, if you assemble the lower parts together, the upper part will be misaligned, but this is because the magnetic metal ribbon is very thin. That is, since the magnetic metal ribbon is very thin, a slight difference in clamping pressure causes a deviation, and this deviation changes the iron loss as described below.
カット部2を境界にしてずれの生じた磁性金属薄帯の積
層部(第6図参照)を図中左部5と右部6とに分離する
と、右部6の最表面層を流れていた磁束7は左部5でも
その最表面層を流れるため、図中に矢印で示されている
ように左部5の内部層を横断して流れ、最表面層に達す
る。他の層についても同様でこのように内部層を磁束7
が横断するので、内部層の磁性金属薄帯にうず電流(図
示せず)が流れて損失が増加する。まだこのような損失
を増加させるずれは磁性金属薄帯内の磁束密度分布に不
つ−性をもたらし、磁歪の原因の一つにもなっているば
かりで寿ぐ、励磁電流も増大させる等の欠点がある。こ
のだめこのずれを小さくする方法として絶縁物4を巻線
3と巻鉄心1との間に配置する(第1図参照)ことが考
えられるが、巻鉄心1の内側の絶縁物4に接した面は揃
っても外側は上述のような理由から揃うことはむずかし
く僅かにずれることが多く、従ってこの種極薄のアモル
ファス磁性合金からなる磁性金属薄帯のような金属薄板
を変圧器鉄心に用いるためには、このずれをいかに小さ
くして損失を低減させるかが大きな課題であった。When the laminated part of the magnetic metal ribbons (see Fig. 6), which is misaligned with the cut part 2 as the boundary, is separated into the left part 5 and the right part 6 in the figure, it was found that the layer was flowing in the outermost layer of the right part 6. Since the magnetic flux 7 also flows through the outermost layer of the left portion 5, it flows across the inner layer of the left portion 5, as indicated by the arrow in the figure, and reaches the outermost layer. The same goes for other layers.
traverses the magnetic metal ribbon, an eddy current (not shown) flows through the magnetic metal ribbon in the inner layer, increasing loss. However, the misalignment that increases such loss brings about inconsistencies in the magnetic flux density distribution within the magnetic metal ribbon, and is one of the causes of magnetostriction, which also increases the exciting current. There is. One possible way to reduce this gap is to place the insulator 4 between the winding 3 and the wound core 1 (see Figure 1). Even if the surfaces are aligned, it is difficult to align the outer edges for the reasons mentioned above, and they often deviate slightly.Therefore, a thin metal plate such as this kind of magnetic metal ribbon made of ultra-thin amorphous magnetic alloy is used for the transformer core. In order to achieve this goal, a major challenge was how to reduce this shift and reduce loss.
本発明は以上の点に鑑みなされたものであり、その目的
とするところは、損失低減を可能とした静止誘導電器の
鉄心を提供するにある。The present invention has been made in view of the above points, and its purpose is to provide an iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance that enables loss reduction.
すなわち本発明は、カット部が、このカット部の間隙を
介して一方の所定の複数枚の金属薄板に他方の所定の複
数枚の金Thk板を対応配置し、これら複数枚の金属薄
板間に間隙を跨いで金属薄板より強度の大きなスペーサ
が配置されていることを特徴とするものである。That is, in the present invention, the cut portion arranges a predetermined plurality of thin metal plates on one side and a plurality of predetermined gold Thk plates on the other side through a gap between the cut portions, and a gap between the thin metal plates. It is characterized in that a spacer stronger than a thin metal plate is placed across the gap.
以下、図示しだ実施例に基づいて本発明を説明する。第
7図および第8図には本発明の一実施例が示されている
。なお従来と同じ部品には同じ符号を付したので説明は
省略する。本実施例ではカット部2aを、このカット部
2aの間隙を介して一方の所定の複数枚の金属薄板8に
他方の所定の複数枚の金属薄板9を対応配置し、これら
複数枚の金属薄板8,9間に間隙を跨いで金属薄板より
強度の大きなスペーサ10を配置して形成した。The present invention will be explained below based on the illustrated embodiments. An embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 7 and 8. Note that parts that are the same as those in the conventional model are given the same reference numerals, and therefore their explanations will be omitted. In this embodiment, the cut portion 2a is arranged such that one predetermined plurality of metal thin plates 8 corresponds to the other predetermined plurality of metal thin plates 9 through the gap between the cut portions 2a. A spacer 10 having a stronger strength than a thin metal plate was placed across the gap between 8 and 9.
このようにすることによシずれのないカット部2aが形
成されるようになって、損失低減を可能とした静止誘導
電器の鉄心を得ることができる。By doing so, the cut portion 2a without any deviation is formed, and it is possible to obtain an iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance that enables loss reduction.
すなわち巻鉄心1aの1個所をカットした後このカット
部2aを一度起立させ、巻線3をこのカット部2aから
巻鉄心1aに挿入し、挿入後カットした積層部の左部5
の所定の複数枚の金属薄板8例えばアモルファス磁性合
金からなる磁性金属薄帯と右一部6の所定の複数枚の金
属薄板9例えば磁性金属薄帯とを突き合わせ、この突き
合わせた上に突き合わせ部を跨いで磁性金属薄帯より強
度の大きなスペーサ10例えば絶縁板10aを配置した
。そしてこれを順に繰シ返してカット部2aを形成した
。このように磁性金属薄帯より強度の大きな絶縁板10
aを配置しだので、従来のようL
な僅か々締圧の表でずれを生じることがなくなって、カ
ット部2aの右部6と左部5との最表面層は対向するよ
うになり、磁束7は図中に矢印で示されているように積
層方向に対して直角方向に流れるようになって、従来の
ように内層部を横断するような磁束がなく、うず電流が
流れないようになシ、損失を低減することができる。That is, after cutting one part of the wound core 1a, this cut part 2a is made to stand up once, and the winding 3 is inserted into the wound core 1a from this cut part 2a, and the left part 5 of the laminated part cut after insertion is
A predetermined plurality of thin metal plates 8, for example, a magnetic metal thin strip made of an amorphous magnetic alloy, and a predetermined plurality of metal thin plates 9, for example, a magnetic metal thin strip, of the right part 6 are butted against each other, and a butted portion is formed on the butted surface. A spacer 10, for example, an insulating plate 10a, which is stronger than the magnetic metal ribbon, is placed across the spacer. Then, this process was repeated in order to form the cut portion 2a. In this way, the insulating plate 10 is stronger than the magnetic metal ribbon.
a is arranged, there is no longer any deviation in the slightly clamping pressure surface of L as in the conventional case, and the outermost surface layers of the right part 6 and left part 5 of the cut part 2a are now facing each other, The magnetic flux 7 now flows in a direction perpendicular to the lamination direction as shown by the arrow in the figure, so that there is no magnetic flux that crosses the inner layer as in the conventional case, and eddy currents do not flow. However, losses can be reduced.
なお本実施例ではスペーサ10として絶縁板10aを用
いだが、絶縁板10aでなくけい素鋼板のような高透磁
率を有している磁性体を使用すれば、カット部2aに絶
縁板10aを使用したことにより増加する空隙が磁性体
で占められるので、空隙が磁性体で補償されるようにな
って、励磁電流を減少することができる。In this embodiment, the insulating plate 10a is used as the spacer 10, but if a magnetic material with high magnetic permeability such as a silicon steel plate is used instead of the insulating plate 10a, the insulating plate 10a can be used for the cut portion 2a. Since the increased air gap is occupied by the magnetic material, the air gap is compensated by the magnetic material, and the excitation current can be reduced.
第9図には本発明の他の実施例が示されている。Another embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG.
本実施例では直線的なカット方法によってカットしたも
のに適用した場合である。この場合にも前述の場合と同
様な作用効果を奏することができる。In this embodiment, the present invention is applied to a product cut using a linear cutting method. In this case as well, the same effects as in the above case can be achieved.
第10図には本発明の更に他の実施例が示されている。FIG. 10 shows yet another embodiment of the invention.
本実施例はステップラップ方法によってカットしたもの
に適用した場合で、ステップが急激に変化する個所Bに
絶縁板10aを挿入した。This example is applied to a product cut by the step wrap method, and an insulating plate 10a is inserted at a location B where the step changes rapidly.
このようにすることによシ損失を低減させることができ
る。すなわちステップラップ方法のものは磁性金属薄帯
の積層部がカット部2aの左部5と右部6とでずれない
特徴があるが、ステップラップのうちステップが急激に
変化する個所Bでは左部5の磁性金属薄帯と右部6の磁
性金属薄帯とのラップ部の対向面積が他の部分に比べて
犬きくなシ、このラップ部を流れる磁束の量が大きくな
るが、このラップ部に絶縁板10aを挿入しだので、こ
の間を流れる磁束の量を低減することができ、損失を低
減することができる。By doing so, the loss can be reduced. In other words, the step-wrap method has the feature that the laminated portion of the magnetic metal ribbon does not shift between the left part 5 and the right part 6 of the cut part 2a, but in the part B of the step-wrap where the step changes rapidly, the left part The opposing area of the lap part between the magnetic metal ribbon 5 and the magnetic metal ribbon 6 on the right side is smaller than other parts, and the amount of magnetic flux flowing through this lap part is large. Since the insulating plate 10a is inserted between the insulating plates 10a, the amount of magnetic flux flowing between the insulating plates 10a can be reduced, and loss can be reduced.
なお以上本発明では図示はしてないがカット部2aはす
べて絶縁テープ等を用いて巻回締付けるので、挿入する
スペーサ10は磁性金属薄帯に無理な力がかからないよ
うに、ばシを除去する等所謂角落しをするのが望ましい
。Although not shown in the present invention, since the cut portions 2a are all wrapped and tightened using insulating tape or the like, the spacer 10 to be inserted should be removed without applying excessive force to the magnetic metal ribbon. It is desirable to do so-called corner cutting.
上述のように本発明は、カット部の金属薄板間にカット
部の間隙を跨いで金属薄板よシ強度の大きなスペーサを
挿入したので、従来のように僅かな締圧の差によってず
れの生じることがなくなって、カット部を境にした左右
の金属薄板が夫々対応して揃いうず電流が流れないよう
になシ、損失低減を可能とした静止誘導電器の鉄心を得
ることができる。As described above, in the present invention, a spacer with greater strength than the thin metal plates is inserted between the thin metal plates of the cut portion, spanning the gap between the cut portions, so that unlike the conventional method, misalignment does not occur due to a slight difference in clamping pressure. As a result, the thin metal plates on the left and right sides of the cut portion are aligned and correspond to each other, preventing the flow of eddy current, making it possible to obtain an iron core for stationary induction appliances that can reduce loss.
第1図は従来の静止誘導電器の鉄心のカットコア方式の
変圧器の縦断側面図、第2図から第4図は従来の静止誘
導電器の鉄心の夫々異なるカット部の状態を示す縦断側
面図、第5図は従来の静止誘導電器の鉄心のカット部の
ずれの状態を示す縦断側面図、第6図は第5図のA枠部
の拡大図、第7図は本発明の静止誘導電器の鉄心の一実
施例のカットコア方式の変圧器のカット部の形成状態を
示す縦断側面図、第8図は同じく一実施例のカット部門
シの縦断側面図、第9図は本発明の静止誘導電器の鉄心
の他の実施例のカット部門りの縦断側面図、第10図は
本発明の静止誘導電器の鉄心の更に他の実施例のカット
部門シの縦断側面図である。
la・・・巻鉄心、2a・・・カット部、8,9・・・
複数枚弔2図
/
第3図
第1図
第5図
弔6図
第8図Figure 1 is a vertical side view of a conventional cut-core type transformer of a stationary induction electric appliance, and Figures 2 to 4 are vertical side views showing the different states of cut parts of the iron core of a conventional stationary induction electric appliance. , FIG. 5 is a vertical side view showing the state of misalignment of the cut portion of the core of a conventional stationary induction appliance, FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of the A-frame part in FIG. 5, and FIG. 7 is a stationary induction appliance of the present invention. FIG. 8 is a longitudinal sectional side view showing the formation of the cut section of a cut core type transformer according to an embodiment of the iron core, FIG. 8 is a longitudinal sectional side view of the cutting section of the embodiment, and FIG. FIG. 10 is a longitudinal sectional side view of the cutting section of another embodiment of the iron core of the stationary induction appliance of the present invention. FIG. la...Wound core, 2a...Cut part, 8, 9...
Multiple-sheet funeral 2/Figure 3 Figure 1 Figure 5 Funeral 6 Figure 8
Claims (1)
カット部を有する静止誘導電器の巻線を装着する鉄心に
おいて、上記カット部の間隙を介して一方の複数枚の前
記金属薄板に他方の複数枚の前記金属薄板を対応配置し
、これら複数枚の金属薄板間に前記間隙を跨いで前記金
属薄板よシ機械的強度の大きなスペーサを配置すること
を特徴とする静止誘導電器の鉄心。 2、前記スペーサが、磁性体で形成したことを特徴とす
る特許請求の範囲第1項記載の静止誘導電器の鉄心。 3゜前記スペーサが、絶縁体で形成したことを特徴とす
る特許請求の範囲第1項記載の静止誘導電器の鉄心。 4゜前記金属薄板が、アモルファス磁性合金で形成され
たものであることを特徴とする特許請求の範囲第1項記
載の静止誘導電器の鉄心。[Scope of Claims] 1. In an iron core to which a winding of a stationary induction appliance is attached, which has a cut portion at least one of which is wound with a plurality of thin metal plates, one of the plurality of thin plates is wound through a gap between the cut portions. The other plurality of metal thin plates are arranged correspondingly to the metal thin plate, and a spacer having greater mechanical strength than the metal thin plate is arranged between these plurality of metal thin plates, spanning the gap. Iron core of stationary induction electric appliances. 2. The iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance according to claim 1, wherein the spacer is made of a magnetic material. 3. The iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance according to claim 1, wherein the spacer is made of an insulator. 4. The iron core for a stationary induction electric appliance according to claim 1, wherein the thin metal plate is made of an amorphous magnetic alloy.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP14873882A JPS5939012A (en) | 1982-08-26 | 1982-08-26 | Core of stationary electric induction apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP14873882A JPS5939012A (en) | 1982-08-26 | 1982-08-26 | Core of stationary electric induction apparatus |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPS5939012A true JPS5939012A (en) | 1984-03-03 |
Family
ID=15459507
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP14873882A Pending JPS5939012A (en) | 1982-08-26 | 1982-08-26 | Core of stationary electric induction apparatus |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPS5939012A (en) |
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61180407A (en) * | 1985-02-05 | 1986-08-13 | Toshiba Corp | Wound core |
| JPS61203516U (en) * | 1985-06-08 | 1986-12-22 | ||
| JPH05101945A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1993-04-23 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Winding iron core |
| JP2011077217A (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2011-04-14 | Fujitsu General Ltd | Choke coil |
-
1982
- 1982-08-26 JP JP14873882A patent/JPS5939012A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS61180407A (en) * | 1985-02-05 | 1986-08-13 | Toshiba Corp | Wound core |
| JPS61203516U (en) * | 1985-06-08 | 1986-12-22 | ||
| JPH05101945A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1993-04-23 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Winding iron core |
| JP2011077217A (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2011-04-14 | Fujitsu General Ltd | Choke coil |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR960000911B1 (en) | Composite silicone steel-amorphous steel transformer core | |
| JPS5939012A (en) | Core of stationary electric induction apparatus | |
| US2558110A (en) | Three-phase transformer core | |
| JPS61180408A (en) | Stationary induction electric apparatus | |
| JPS59175110A (en) | Wound iron core stationary induction appliance | |
| JP2588106B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of three-phase wound core transformer | |
| JP3671171B2 (en) | Coil device and manufacturing method thereof | |
| US2550127A (en) | Wound core for electrical induction apparatus | |
| JP2940356B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of three-phase amorphous tripod core | |
| JPS5849010B2 (en) | Wound core with gap | |
| JPH04299812A (en) | Manufacture of static induction electric equipment | |
| JP2612305B2 (en) | Manufacturing method of wound iron core | |
| JPH113830A (en) | Zero-phase current transformer | |
| JPS6364883B2 (en) | ||
| KR100275290B1 (en) | Choke | |
| JP2764477B2 (en) | Wound core transformer and method of manufacturing the same | |
| JPS6174314A (en) | Manufacture of transformer core | |
| JPS61198706A (en) | Core for induction electric apparatus | |
| KR850000859B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of winding core type-trans-former with auxiliary core | |
| JPH03190112A (en) | Composite core | |
| JPH0365646B2 (en) | ||
| JPS63110711A (en) | Iron core of transformer | |
| JPH07230926A (en) | Iron core type reactor with gap | |
| JPH0831659A (en) | Oil-immersed amorphous iron core transformer | |
| JPS59172959A (en) | Manufacture of core |