JPS63201224A - Structure of high building - Google Patents

Structure of high building

Info

Publication number
JPS63201224A
JPS63201224A JP3372587A JP3372587A JPS63201224A JP S63201224 A JPS63201224 A JP S63201224A JP 3372587 A JP3372587 A JP 3372587A JP 3372587 A JP3372587 A JP 3372587A JP S63201224 A JPS63201224 A JP S63201224A
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
force
outer peripheral
building
column
peripheral end
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
JP3372587A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH0619158B2 (en
Inventor
遠藤 克彦
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mitsui Construction Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Mitsui Construction Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mitsui Construction Co Ltd filed Critical Mitsui Construction Co Ltd
Priority to JP3372587A priority Critical patent/JPH0619158B2/en
Publication of JPS63201224A publication Critical patent/JPS63201224A/en
Publication of JPH0619158B2 publication Critical patent/JPH0619158B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Building Environments (AREA)
  • Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)

Abstract

(57)【要約】本公報は電子出願前の出願データであるた
め要約のデータは記録されません。
(57) [Summary] This bulletin contains application data before electronic filing, so abstract data is not recorded.

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】 (産業上の利用分野) 本発明は、合理的な構造方式を採用することにより、特
別な補強をすることなく経済的な構造設計が可能となる
、高層建築物の構造に関するものである。
[Detailed Description of the Invention] (Industrial Application Field) The present invention is a high-rise building that enables economical structural design without special reinforcement by adopting a rational structural method. It's about structure.

(従来の技術) 第5図は従来の高層建築物lの構造力学的な応力分布を
示す概念図である。
(Prior Art) FIG. 5 is a conceptual diagram showing the structural mechanical stress distribution of a conventional high-rise building.

しかして、該第4図において、長期荷重としての鉛直力
のみが作用している場合は、第5図(a)に示すように
各社2には負担面積に応じて略均等に軸力(圧縮力)が
加わる。
In Fig. 4, if only the vertical force as a long-term load is acting, then the axial force (compression force) is added.

次に、例えば建築物1に対して第4図中右方向から水平
力としての風圧力Wが作用した場合を想定すると、該水
平力のみに対する各社2の応力分布としては、第5図(
b)に示すように第4図中右手分の柱2には引張力が作
用し、一方左半分の柱2には圧縮力が作用することとな
る。
Next, for example, assuming that a wind pressure W as a horizontal force acts on the building 1 from the right direction in Figure 4, the stress distribution of each company 2 in response to only the horizontal force is as shown in Figure 5 (
As shown in b), a tensile force acts on the column 2 on the right side of FIG. 4, while a compressive force acts on the column 2 on the left half.

よって、本従来例に係る高層建築物のように水平力時の
応力が前記長期荷重としての鉛直力に比較して相対的に
大きくなるものにあっては、現実には各社2に生じる応
力は、該鉛直力との合成応力分布として第5図(C)に
示すようなものとなり、図中右側端部の柱2には引張力
が支配荷重として作用していることとなる。
Therefore, in a high-rise building according to this conventional example, where the stress during horizontal force is relatively large compared to the vertical force as the long-term load, the stress occurring in each company 2 is actually , and the vertical force, the resultant stress distribution is as shown in FIG. 5(C), and the tensile force acts as a governing load on the column 2 at the right end in the figure.

即ち、本来引張力以外の外力を想定して設計するべき柱
について引張力も考慮しなければならないという問題が
発生している。
In other words, a problem has arisen in that columns, which should originally be designed assuming external forces other than tensile force, must also take tensile force into consideration.

そこで、従来は第6図に示すように前記引張力を予め設
計段階で考慮しておき、コンクリートが該引張力を負担
しないですむように、柱2の断面においてコンクリート
3内の中心部分に、いわゆる軸鉄筋4として鋼管などの
引張力抵抗部材を埋設しておくものや、柱主筋5に所定
のプレストレスを付与しておき、前記引張力に対処させ
るよううな設計が採用されていた。
Therefore, conventionally, as shown in Fig. 6, the above-mentioned tensile force is taken into consideration in advance at the design stage, and a so-called axis is placed at the center of the concrete 3 in the cross section of the column 2 so that the concrete does not have to bear the tensile force. A design in which a tensile force resisting member such as a steel pipe is buried as the reinforcing bar 4, or a predetermined prestress is applied to the column main reinforcing bar 5 to cope with the tensile force has been adopted.

(発明が解決すべき問題点) しかしながら、かかる従来例においては軸鉄筋4を加え
る事や、柱主筋5にプレストレスを付与するための作業
等が余分に必要となり、施工作業が煩雑となり、また、
経済的な設計の観点からも問題を抱えていた。
(Problems to be Solved by the Invention) However, in such a conventional example, extra work such as adding the shaft reinforcement 4 and applying prestress to the column main reinforcement 5 is required, making the construction work complicated. ,
There were also problems from an economical design perspective.

本発明は、かかる従来の問題点に鑑み開発されたもので
あり、設計段階で予め引張力の作用する柱がなくなるよ
うに構造計画を行なうことにより、合理的な設計が可能
な建築物の構造を提供することを目的とするものである
The present invention was developed in view of such conventional problems, and it is possible to rationally design the structure of a building by planning the structure in advance so that there are no columns on which tensile force acts at the design stage. The purpose is to provide the following.

(問題点を解決するための手段) 上記目的を達成するため、本発明に係る建築物の構造に
おいては、水平力時の軸力の負担が建築物の外周端部に
おいて低減するように、該外周端部における梁の剛性を
内部よりも所定量だけ低下させたことを特徴とするもの
である。
(Means for Solving the Problems) In order to achieve the above object, in the structure of the building according to the present invention, the structure of the building is designed so that the burden of axial force at the time of horizontal force is reduced at the outer peripheral edge of the building. It is characterized in that the rigidity of the beam at the outer peripheral end is lowered by a predetermined amount than the inside.

(作用) 上記構成から成る本発明においては、予め高層の建築物
の外周端部において、水平力を伝達する梁の剛性を該外
周部分だけ低減することにより、水平力作用時に水平構
面から各社に伝達される軸力の負担が、前記外周端部の
柱において他部位より低減し、結果として前記外周端部
付近の柱に引張力が作用することがなくなるよう構造設
計を行。
(Function) In the present invention having the above configuration, by reducing the stiffness of the beam that transmits horizontal force by the outer peripheral part in advance at the outer peripheral end of a high-rise building, it is possible to The structure is designed so that the burden of the axial force transmitted to the column at the outer peripheral end is reduced compared to other parts, and as a result, no tensile force is applied to the column near the outer peripheral end.

なうことが可能となるものである。It is possible to become

(実施例) 以下、本発明の好適な実施例を図面を参照しつつ説明す
る。
(Embodiments) Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings.

第1図乃至第3図は、本発明の一実施例を示すものであ
り、第1図は高層建築物10の特定層における概念的平
面図を示している。
1 to 3 show one embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 1 shows a conceptual plan view of a specific layer of a high-rise building 10. FIG.

しかして、該高層建築物10においては、格子状に6梁
11が配設され、該梁11相互の交点に各社12が配置
される設計になっている。
The high-rise building 10 is designed in such a way that six beams 11 are arranged in a grid pattern, and each company 12 is placed at the intersection of the beams 11.

ここで、梁11の断面性能が長さ方向の全体を通じて同
一であれば、外周端部の各社12aは・鉛直力に対する
負担面積は中央部の各社12bに比較して約半分であり
、一方、水平力が作用した場合の該水平力のみに対する
軸力は、該外周端部の柱12aが最も大きくなる。
Here, if the cross-sectional performance of the beam 11 is the same throughout the length direction, the area 12a at the outer peripheral end bears the vertical force is about half that of the area 12b at the center, and on the other hand, When a horizontal force is applied, the axial force due to only the horizontal force is greatest at the outer peripheral end of the column 12a.

そこで、本実施例においては、第2図に示すように、或
特定の梁11を例にとると、該梁の断面性能を両側の外
周端部11aにおいてのみ低減化し、該両端部における
梁剛性が中央部分よりも所定量たけ低下するような構成
としている。
Therefore, in this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, taking a particular beam 11 as an example, the cross-sectional performance of the beam is reduced only at the outer circumferential ends 11a on both sides, and the beam rigidity at both ends is reduced. The structure is such that the distance is lowered by a predetermined amount than in the central portion.

よって、格子状に一体化された6梁11が構成する水平
構面は、外周端部のみその剛性が低下しているため、水
平力としての風圧力、地震力が作用した場合、該水平力
は従来のよ・うに均等に各社12に伝達されず、外周端
部の柱12aの負担する軸力は、他の内部の柱12bに
比較して、上記したその部分の梁剛性の低下した分だけ
少なくてすむこととなる。
Therefore, since the horizontal structural surface composed of the six beams 11 integrated in a lattice shape has reduced rigidity only at the outer peripheral edge, when wind pressure or earthquake force acts as a horizontal force, the horizontal force is not transmitted equally to each company 12 as in the past, and the axial force borne by the pillars 12a at the outer peripheral end is equal to the decrease in beam rigidity in that part, as described above, compared to the other internal pillars 12b. This means that you will only need less.

即ち、第3図(b)に示すように、前記°水平力のみに
対する各社12の応力分布は、これに対応する第 図に
示した従来例の応力分布に比較して外周端部の柱12a
の軸力が少なくなった分を他の内部の各社12bがより
多く負担していることとなる。
That is, as shown in FIG. 3(b), the stress distribution of each company 12 in response to only the horizontal force is different from the stress distribution of the conventional example shown in the corresponding diagram.
This means that the other internal companies 12b bear more of the burden of the reduced axial force.

よって、長期荷重としての鉛直力との合成応力分布は、
第3図(C)に示すように全ての柱12について圧縮側
となり、上記従来例のように柱に軸鉄筋を内臓したり、
プレストレスを導入したりする作業が全く不要となる。
Therefore, the composite stress distribution with the vertical force as a long-term load is:
As shown in FIG. 3(C), all the columns 12 are on the compression side, and the columns have internal reinforcing bars as in the conventional example, or
The work of introducing prestress is completely unnecessary.

なお、第3図(b)に示す応力分布は、第1図において
右方向から水平力が作用した場合の例であるが、上記の
如く本実施例においては外周部のすべての梁剛性を低減
化させであるので、いずれの方向からの水平力に対して
も同様の作用効果を奏しつるものである。
The stress distribution shown in Figure 3(b) is an example when a horizontal force is applied from the right direction in Figure 1, but as mentioned above, in this example, the stiffness of all the beams on the outer periphery is reduced. Since it is symmetrical, the same effect can be achieved against horizontal force from any direction.

(発明の効果) 本発明は上述した如く構成されており、水平力時の軸力
の負担が建築物の外周端部において低減するように、該
外周端部における梁の剛性を内部よりも所定量だけ低下
させるという合理的な構造方式を採用することにより、
従来例の如く柱自体に特別な補強をすることなく、特定
の柱に対して引張力が支配荷重となるおそれを排除し、
経済的な構造設計が可能となる。
(Effects of the Invention) The present invention is configured as described above, and in order to reduce the burden of axial force during horizontal force at the outer peripheral end of the building, the rigidity of the beam at the outer peripheral end is lower than that inside the building. By adopting a rational structure method that reduces only a quantitative amount,
Eliminates the possibility that tensile force becomes a dominant load on a specific column without special reinforcement of the column itself as in the conventional case,
Economical structural design becomes possible.

また、各社の断面構成は同一のものでよ、いこととなり
、施工性の点でも好ましいものである。
In addition, the cross-sectional configurations of each company may be the same, which is preferable in terms of workability.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief explanation of the drawing]

第1図乃至第3図は本発明の一実施例を示し、第1図は
本実施例に係る高層建築物の特定層の概念的平面図、第
2図は特定の梁の構成を示す概念的要部断面図、第3図
(a)乃至第3図(C)は各々柱の応力分布を示す説明
図、第4図は従来の高層建築物の概略立面図、第5図(
a)乃至(c)は各々その各社の応力分布図、第6図は
従来の柱の概略断面図である。 1.10−・・高層建築物、2.12−・・柱、3・・
・コンクリート、   4・・・軸鉄筋、5・・・柱主
筋、    11−・・梁、11a−・・外周端部の梁
。 1 l b−・・内部の梁。
1 to 3 show one embodiment of the present invention, FIG. 1 is a conceptual plan view of a specific layer of a high-rise building according to this embodiment, and FIG. 2 is a conceptual diagram showing the configuration of a specific beam. 3(a) to 3(C) are explanatory diagrams showing the stress distribution of columns, FIG. 4 is a schematic elevational view of a conventional high-rise building, and FIG. 5 (
a) to (c) are stress distribution diagrams of each company, and FIG. 6 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a conventional column. 1.10-...high-rise building, 2.12-...column, 3...
- Concrete, 4... Axial reinforcement, 5... Column main reinforcement, 11-... Beam, 11a-... Beam at outer peripheral end. 1 l b--Internal beam.

Claims (1)

【特許請求の範囲】[Claims] 水平力時の軸力の負担が建築物の外周端部において低減
するように、該外周端部における梁の剛性を内部よりも
所定量だけ低下させたことを特徴とする高層建築物の構
造。
A structure of a high-rise building, characterized in that the rigidity of the beam at the outer peripheral end of the building is lowered by a predetermined amount than the inside so that the burden of axial force during horizontal force is reduced at the outer peripheral end of the building.
JP3372587A 1987-02-17 1987-02-17 High-rise building structure Expired - Fee Related JPH0619158B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3372587A JPH0619158B2 (en) 1987-02-17 1987-02-17 High-rise building structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP3372587A JPH0619158B2 (en) 1987-02-17 1987-02-17 High-rise building structure

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPS63201224A true JPS63201224A (en) 1988-08-19
JPH0619158B2 JPH0619158B2 (en) 1994-03-16

Family

ID=12394373

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP3372587A Expired - Fee Related JPH0619158B2 (en) 1987-02-17 1987-02-17 High-rise building structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JPH0619158B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014040733A (en) * 2012-08-22 2014-03-06 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Building structure

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2014040733A (en) * 2012-08-22 2014-03-06 Takenaka Komuten Co Ltd Building structure

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0619158B2 (en) 1994-03-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4405363B2 (en) Seismic reinforced concrete member and manufacturing method thereof
JPH1096329A (en) Seismic reinforcement of existing buildings
JP3030695B2 (en) Pipe arch bridge of three-dimensional restraint concrete structural member
JPS63201224A (en) Structure of high building
JPH069170Y2 (en) Beam structure
JPS6145042A (en) Mold frame for casting concrete
JP6513754B2 (en) Reinforcement structure of reinforced concrete wall column
JPS58199957A (en) Composite reinforced concrete structure
JP3685271B2 (en) Reinforced concrete beams using extremely low yield point steel
JP3938718B2 (en) Reinforced concrete beam structure
JP2976255B2 (en) Column and beam joint structure
JPS61179949A (en) reinforced concrete column
JP4695790B2 (en) Beam-column joint structure
JPH03206221A (en) Reinforced structure for junction portion of pole and beam of armored concrete
JPH06229067A (en) Reinforcing structure of steel square column
JPH0723456Y2 (en) Square steel pipe concrete member
JPS63197777A (en) Precast reinforced concrete shear wall
JPS63297656A (en) Structure of reinforced concrete pillar
JP2990219B2 (en) Reinforced joint construction method for PC columns
JPH01198935A (en) Structure for reinforced concrete or steel framed reinforced concrete structure column-beam joint
JPH09302952A (en) Seismic retrofitting method and seismic retrofitting structure for existing buildings
JPH08144366A (en) Joint structure of steel encased reinforced concrete column or steel frame column with steel frame beam
JPS62276147A (en) Construction method for reinforcing slabs around pillar and opening part of prestressed flat plate structure
JPH0650014B2 (en) Reinforcing structure of reinforced concrete cylinders
JPS6217270A (en) Earthquake-proof wall element

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees