OA19698A - Improved Methode for Manufacture of Macrobeads - Google Patents

Improved Methode for Manufacture of Macrobeads Download PDF

Info

Publication number
OA19698A
OA19698A OA1201400204 OA19698A OA 19698 A OA19698 A OA 19698A OA 1201400204 OA1201400204 OA 1201400204 OA 19698 A OA19698 A OA 19698A
Authority
OA
OAPI
Prior art keywords
cells
agarose
température
bead
beads
Prior art date
Application number
OA1201400204
Inventor
Barry Smith
Lawrence Gazda
Melissa LARAMORE
Timothy Hamilton
Original Assignee
The Rogosin Institute, Inc.
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Rogosin Institute, Inc. filed Critical The Rogosin Institute, Inc.
Publication of OA19698A publication Critical patent/OA19698A/en

Links

Abstract

The invention relates to an improved method for making agarose coated, agarose beads which contain cells. The method which is preferably automated, involves placing manufactured beads in a sample of mineral oil at a temperature gradient, such that the temperature drops as the bead moves through the oil. Preferably, a "trumpet tool" and a "straw tool" are employed in the method.

Description

IMPROVED METHOD FOR MANUFACTURE OF MACROBEADS
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[01 ] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/592,949 filed January 31, 2012, incorporated by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[02 ] This invention relates to improved methods for making a composition of matter which comprises cells, secretory cells in particular, entrapped in a permeable bead or other structure, which is then coated with agarose. The bead may comprise or consist of agarose. Litex agarose is especially preferred for the beads.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ART
[03 ] The manufacture of compositions of matter which contain viable cells, entrapped in permeable media, has been shown to be important in various fields, such as diabètes therapy, cancer treatment, and stem cell maintenance. In this regard, see, e.g., Reissue 40,555; U.S. Patent Nos. 7,838,291; 6,818,230; 6,808,705; 6,303,151; 6,224,912; 5,888,497; and 5,643,569, and published patent application 2007/0071732, ail of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
[04 ] The processes for making these compositions of matter, hereafter referred to as “encapsulâtes,” has been essentially the same, regardless of the type of cell used. After isolation or securing of the cells of interest, these are suspended in an aqueous solution of an agent such as agarose, collagen, or combinations of such, or placed on a material such as gelatin sponge. When aqueous solutions are used, semi-solid beads containing the cells of interest are formed by placing the suspension in minerai oil. If gelatin sponge is used, the product, containing the cells, is rolled into a sphere, after which agarose is poured onto it, to form a bead.
f
[05 ] The beads are then contacted to a solution of agarose, in, e.g., a Teflon spoon. The beads roll in the mixture, to form what are referred to in the art cited supra as agarose-coated macrobeads.
[06 ] The initial teachings as shown by, e.g., RE 40,555 and U.S. Patent No. 5,888,497 which teach encapsulation of secretory cells, such insulin producing islets and cancer cells, hâve been followed by improvements, including the encapsulation of stem cells, as shown by U.S. Patent No. 7,838,291 and via improvements in materials used, as seen in, e.g., published patent application 2007/0071732; however, there is an ongoing need to improve the methodology for making these useful materials.
[07 ] One improvement, which is very désirable in this field, is the ability to automate what is a manual process.
[08 ] In the course of automating the process of manufacture, the inventors hâve developed spécial tools, which facilitate the manufacturing process. In addition, they hâve found that in finishing the process via placing the macrobeads in a vessel of minerai oil at a température gradient, one can produce macrobeads with more uniform shape and even texture than was believed possible.
[09 ] How this is accomplished will be seen in the disclosure, which follows.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[10] Figure 1 shows the automated dispensing of cells and agarose into a multiwell array which contains minerai oil.
[11] Figures 2a - 2c présent different views of a preferred embodiment of the “trumpet tool” of the invention.
[12] Figure 3 shows a second embodiment of the trumpet tool.
[13] Figures 4a and 4b show different embodiments of the straw tool invention.
[14] Figure 5 depicts a summary of the process of the invention.
? '
[15] Figure 6 shows a device used to maintain température gradient in operation of the invention.
[16] Figure 7 depicts levels of insulin production from beads made with different concentrations and types of agarose.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[17] Reference is made to the U.S. Patents cited supra, ail of which describe detailed manual méthodologies for making macrobeads, which contain different types of cells, such as secretory cells as defined therein. The invention described herein modifies those methods by replacing the final step of contacting the agarose coated, agarose beads with minerai oil in a spoon or on a Teflon surface, with a vessel containing minerai oil kept at a température gradient, as described infra.
[18] Macrobeads such as are described in these patents may also be made robotically or via automation. One such approach is described herein.
[19] In one embodiment, as in depicted Figure 1, a robotic dispenser, such as an array of pipettes, dispenses secretory cells into a multiple well plate, such as a standard 96 well plate. Molten agarose is then added to the wells. The cells and molten agarose are then transferred via, e.g., automated means such as a multi-pipette array, to minerai oil containing means such as single well or multiwell containers, such as 96 well plates, to form beads.
[20] The beads are then removed from the wells, preferably via the use of a socalled “trumpet tool,” depicted in Figures “2a-c and 3.” The trumpet tool, as is elaborated upon infra, is designed so as not to disrupt the surface of the bead.
[21] In a further embodiment, an exit means is provided at the bottom of the well, by which the beads escape the well and may be used in the steps which follow. In a still further embodiment, the beads resulting from the process discussed supra, may be transferred to the top of the minerai oil via automated means, such as a moveable j
platform, and also removed from the minerai oil containing means, via automated Systems.
[22] Following pick up by the trumpet tool, or passage via the exit means, and removal of any adhèrent minerai oil by means of rinsing with an appropriate solution, such as a balanced sait solution, the beads are placed in wells containing new, warmed agarose. Following this, the beads are removed together with the warm agarose, preferably using a so-called “straw tool,” as shown in Figures 4a and 4b using mild suction, and are dispensed to vessels containing minerai oil at a controlled température gradient.
[23] The vessel containing the minerai oil may be, e.g., a test tube, cuvette, beaker, or any other object that is suitable, although test tubes and cuvettes, of various sizes are preferred. The material used to make these containers, i.e., the test tubes, cuvettes, etc., may vary. Glass is especially preferred, although other materials, such as those coated with a substance to provide a hydrophilic layer, may be used.
[24] The température gradient in the vessel may be maintained by any method known to the art. Key is that the température of the minerai oil be higher at the top of the vessel than at the bottom thereof. The température and amount of gradient will vary based on, e.g., the length of the vessel, the type of cell encapsulated, the type of agarose used, and so forth. The factors which are important to setting these values include, e.g., températures at which the encapsulated cells are viable, températures at which the agarose employed will solidify, and so forth. The température at the start of the gradient is preferably from 20°C to 80°C, more preferably from 20°C to 50°C, and even more preferably, from 20°C to 40°C. Ideally, the starting température is from about 20°C to about 25°C. The température at the bottom of the vessel may also vary, ranging from, e.g., 0°C to -10°C, more preferably 0°C to -8°C, and most preferably from about 0°C to about -2°C. The total differential between the highest and lowest températures is preferably from 20°C to 50°C, more preferably from about 20°C to about 30°C.
[25] The figures which are a part of this application will amplify upon the preceding description.
?
[26] Figure 1 shows how both the cells and the agarose are dispensed into wells of plates. Following removal of the minerai oil via, e.g., washing or aspiration, or via the exit means discussed supra, the “trumpet tool” referred to supra, and as is shown in Figures 2a - 2c and 3 is inserted into the well, so as to remove the beads with entrapped cells. This trumpet tool has a vacuum source attached at one end, which does not disrupt the surface of the bead so as to facilitate its removal.
[27] The bead consisting of one layer of agarose and the cells is deposited via the so-called “trumpet tool” into a new well, fîlled with heated agarose which serves as the second layer, or coating of agarose. The bead is removed together with the warm agarose, preferably by using a “straw tool,” such as one of those shown in Figures 4a and 4b, preferably with the aid of mild suction, and the bead is dispensed to a vessel containing the température gradient minerai oil. The température gradient may be maintained by, e.g., the device shown in Figure 5, but the skilled artisan will be familiar with other options. When the macrobead has traversed the vessel and has reached the bottom an elongated form of the trumpet tool may be used, with suction, to remove the macrobeads for washing in medium, or as noted, supra, an exit means for removal of the bead may be employed. At this point, the macrobeads are ready for use, although in different situations it may be préférable to permit the cells to proliferate and/or mature within the beads until a sufficient number are présent or until a spécifie product is expressed by the cells. This time period could range from, e.g., a week to several months.
[28] Referring now to the figures of the claimed invention, Figures 2a, 2b, 2c, and 3 show different views of devices in accordance with the invention, the so called “trumpet tool.”
[29] Referring to Figure 2a, a trumpet tool 40 is shown. The description of the tool as a “trumpet tool” cornes from the resemblance of négative conical section 41 to a trumpet. At one end, a négative conical segment 41 is provided, with a rim 42 attached to the conical end 41. The conical end 41 connects to a hollow, longitudinal section 43 which is adapted for passage of a fluid therethrough, such as air.
[30] As Figure 2a shows, the hollow longitudinal section 43 runs along the entirety of the device. One can see collar means 44 positioned about 2/3 to 3/4 of the way along the length of the trumpet tool, relative to the négative conical end. The collar means 44, as well as several other features described herein, are artifacts of the manufacturing process and do not impact the functioning of the device.
[31] Collar means 44, however, marks the point at which the longitudinal means expands its circumference. The portion of the device represented by 45 corresponds to a coupling end which, in operation, connects the tool to a source of fluid, e.g., air, such as a vacuum. Connection aperture 46 has the widest circumference of any part of the device and acts to complété connection to, e.g., a vacuum means. Internai structures, such as those exhibited in Figure 2c, are provided to facilitate attachment of vacuum means. These structures may vary, based upon the apparatus being used.
[32] One observes a ridge means 47 in the device, as well as a sériés of evenly spaced projections 48a, b, and c, ail of which are, as with collar means 44, artifacts of manufacturing; however, these projections also serve to help hold their associated tools in place in, e.g., a dispensing rack.
[33] The interior of the device can be seen in both Figures 2b and 2c, where it can be seen that in fact the device is hollow along its entire length. The view of négative conical segment in Figure 2c shows in greater detail how it tapers to a point where the circumference is slightly smaller than an object it is designed to engage, e.g., a bead.
[34] In operation, the device 40 is connected via connection end 46 to, e.g., a vacuum pump means, and is positioned, vertically over the object to be removed, such as a bead. The vacuum pump means (not shown), removes any air within the tool, and permits uptake of the bead, e.g., via controlling the force of the suction created by the vacuum, the configuration of the négative conical end 41 permits removal of a bead, such as a semi-soft agarose bead, from one position, and movement to another, such as a solution of coating agarose. At that point, the vacuum pressure is changed via, e.g., providing air to longitudinal means 45, which acts to expel the bead into the agarose solution from conical end 41 without any changes to the configuration of the bead.
ï
[35] Figure 3 shows another embodiment of the device of Figures 2a-2c. This device, prepared via a different manufacturing means than the embodiment of Figures 2a2c, exhibits ridge means along the longitudinal section 43. Also, it will be noted that there are variations in the collar means, as well as in the ridge means 47 and 48a-c. The négative conical end 41 and its rim, as well as the coupling end 45 and connecting aperture, however, function in the same way as the comparable structures of Figures 2a2c.
[36] Figures 4a and 4b depict embodiments of a device known hereafter as the “straw tool.” Referring now to Figure 4a a straw tool 50 is shown. The tool exhibits essentially cylindrical geometry along a hollow longitudinal axis 51, a coupling end 52, and a receiving end 53.
[37] The straw tool includes a recessed space 54, which extends along the longitudinal axis 51, opening at receiving end 53.
[38] The receiving space 54 extends along the longitudinal axis and, which adjoins a canal section 55, which can hâve a smaller diameter than the receiving space. This canal section 55 joins connecting means 52, and the combination of “52,” “54” and “55” form a working channel which accepts changes in pressure of a fluid, such as air or another gas. In operation, connecting means 52, is coupled to a device capable of changing pressure of a fluid in the straw tool, such as an air pump. The straw tool is then placed over an object, such as a bead, and upon the change in pressure, the bead is removed by the straw tool. It should be noted that the diameter of the opening at receiving end 53 is large enough to pick up the object, e.g., the bead and to permit the bead to move vertically in the longitudinal cavity of the tool. Once the bead is moved to the desired location, a second change of pressure causes the bead to drop, and permit reuse of the straw tool.
[39] Figures 4a and 4b differ in that configurations of the connecting means 52 are different; however, the différence in configurations results from manufacturing processes and does not impact the operation of the device.
[40] In each device, broken unes indicate adaptation of the straw tool for réception of a vacuum connecting means of choice. A recessed channel 56 is depicted, which is capable of accepting a connection means, such as an expandable O-ring. Also a feature of the device is a means 57, for impeding progress of a pipette. This “pipette shelf” stops passage of a pipette or other delivery means for the fluid, e.g., air.
[41] The examples which follow should be taken as exemplary, but not limitative, of the invention as it is described herein.
EXAMPLE 1
[42] Powdered agarose (Litex HSB-LV) was dissolved in minimal essential medium to a concentration of either 0.8% or 4.5% (w/v), and then autoclaved at 121 °C, for 20 minutes. This produced viscous molten solutions. The agarose solutions were cooled and maintained at 51-53°C, or 61-63°C, respectively.
[43] A total of 150,000 RENCA (rénal cancer) cells were added to a well, after which 0.25 ml of the 0.8% agarose solution was added to form a suspension, and this cell/agarose suspension was then dispensed into either room température minerai oil in a plastic bowl, or into a deep well 96 plastic plate, previously filled with room température minerai oil.
[44] RENCA cell containing agarose macrobeads formed, as round beads with smooth surfaces, and evenly distributed cells. The minerai oil was then aspirated away from the macrobeads, and the macrobeads were washed with RPMI cell culture medium.
[45] The coating for the macrobead used the 4.5% w/v solution. The agarose for the coating was same type as was used for the beads; however, it should be noted that they can differ.
[46] To carry out the manual mode for preparing the beads, the beads prepared supra, were rolled in a plastic spoon which contained 1.0 ml of the 4.5% agarose, which had been maintained at 61-63°C, after which they were dropped into room température minerai oil.
[47] In the method of the invention, the coating material was maintained at 6163 °C, and was transferred to a 24 well plate. The “trumpet tool” shown in Figure 2a and discussed, supra, was then used to remove the beads from the room température minerai oil and to place them into the second coat, agarose solution following washing of the beads to remove the minerai oil. A straw tool, depicted in Figure 4a, was used together with gentle suction, to remove the beads, together with 0.5 ml of agarose to a vessel containing minerai oil maintained at a température gradient.
[48] Macrobeads were dispensed from the straw tool, into the top of the minerai oil gradient, which was maintained at varying températures, as discussed infra. As the macrobead descended through the minerai oil, the coating solidified on the bead forming a sphere. The température of the minerai oil decreased from the top to the bottom of the vessel, to a low température at the bottom, also as described infra. The agarose/agarose macrobeads were then removed from the vessel using the trumpet tool of Figure 2a and were then washed in media. The resulting macrobeads were then ready for routine tissue culture.
EXAMPLE 2
[49] A sériés of different experiments, using the température gradient described, supra were used.
Experiment Top Température Bottom Température
Control RT (Room Température) RT (Room Température)
1 25°C -2°C
2 30°C -2°C
3 40°C -2°C
4 RT RT
5 50°C -1.8°C
6 60°C -1.6°C
7 RT RT
8 70°C o°c
I
9 25°C -2°C
|50] After beads were recovered and washed, as discussed, supra, they were tested for metabolic activity. This évaluation was carried out using a standard MTT assay, which is well known in the art. Metabolic activity was determined at day =0 for 5 non-encapsulated cells, and at 7 days post-production for the encapsulâtes. The results are summarized below.
Experiment Control 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Free Cells 0.603 0.682 0.682 0.682 0.669 0723 0.723 0.517 0.686 0.686
Encapsulâtes 0.507 0.411 0.299 0.279 0.261 0.182 0.173 0.448 0.167 0.415
[51] The results indicate that while the encapsulated cells survived regardless of the starting température when dropped into the gradient, metabolic activity was inversely proportional to the température at which the gradient began, i.e., the higher the température, the lower the resulting metabolic activity.
EXAMPLE 3
[52] Given that the optimal starting température of the minerai oil gradient was established to be about 25°C, and the ending température about -2°C, this was used in a set of experiments to détermine metabolic activity, and tumor inhibitory capacity.
[53] Metabolic activity was determined in the same manner set forth supra.
[54] Tumor inhibitory activity was determined by seeding RENCA cells into 6 20 well plates (15,000 cells/well) in either 4 ml of fresh culture medium, or the same amount of culture medium taken from cultures of the encapsulâtes, following 5 days of culture. The free RENCA cells were cultured in the medium, for 5 days at 37°C and a 5% CO2 atmosphère. The RENCA cells were then fixed with methanol, stained with 0.33% (w/v) neutral red, and absorbance was determined at 540 nm, using 630 nm as a reference wavelength. Inhibition was defined as the percent différence in Abs54onm-63Onm between treated, and fresh media.
i
[55] The results that follow présent metabolic activity data. “Free cell” refers to RENCA cells which were not treated with agarose at ail, while “lst coat” refers to uncoated beads.
Age (days) Type Control T— Control 2 CM Control 3 CO xr Control 4 LO CD Control 5 r-
0 Free Cell 0.768 0.530 0.378 0.462 0.481 0.532 0.532 0.384 0.518 0.518 0.530 0.553
1 1 st coat 0.926 1.209 0.912 1.279 1.056 1.120 1.120 1.129 1.002 1.002 1.157 1.711
7 1 week 0.247 0.260 0.332 0.143 0.739 0.801 0.710 0.409 0.390 0.227 1.330 0.697
21 3 week 0.201 0.351 0.328 0.258 0.555 0.560 0.770 0.462 0.531 0.380 0.977 0.555
35 5 week 0.647 n/a 0.856 n/a 1.156 n/a 1.092 1.141 n/a n/a 1.447 n/a
49 7 week 1.080 n/a 1.236 n/a 1.324 n/a 1.066 1.215 n/a n/a 1.926 n/a
84 12 week 1.025 n/a 1.548 n/a 1.623 n/a 1.095 1.725 n/a n/a 1.886 n/a
112 16 week 1.652 n/a 2.440 n/a 2.247 n/a 1.128 1.872 n/a n/a n/a n/a
[56] In the table which follows, the tumor inhibitory capacity was determined:
Age (days) Type O c O O 2 £Z O O CM Control co Control to O c O O CD
35 % 29.99% 29.80% 12.78% 11.23% 11.10% 7.54% 17.37% 23.97% 26.20% 33.85% 33.28%
49 % 23.62% 33.53% 26.15% 33.98% 32.70% 29.63% 29.63% 34.54% 40.90% n/a n/a
84 % 33.10% 45.69% 23.41% 33.93% 43.20% 56.02% 56.09% n/a n/a n/a n/a
112 % 50.19% 55.66% 42.21% 46.03% 55.28% 44.84% n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
[57] The results indicate that the agarose beads produced in accordance with the invention are équivalent in ail relevant respects to manually produced beads.
EXAMPLE 4
[58] Beads were produced in accordance with the invention as described supra, and the manual method as represented via the cited prior art. Over a period of 7 months, ten beads were selected, at random to détermine their diameters. The results, presented in the table which follows, shows that beads produced in accordance with the invention 30 hâve a more consistent diameter, and hence a more consistent coating.
Automated: Diameter (in) Manual: Diameter (in)
Jan 0.352 0.350 Parameter Auto Manual
0.363 0.347
0.364 0.347 Mean 0.350386 0.3339714
0.354 0.353 Standard Error 0.001267 0.0015674
0.350 0.346 Médian 0.35 0.3325
0.347 0.348 Mode 0.347 0.347
0.355 0.351 Standard Déviation 0.010601 0.0131137
0.348 0.350 Sample Variance 0.000112 0.000172
0.353 0.352 Kurtosis 0.697026 -1.117773
0.347 0.350 Skewness -0.30036 -0.151897
Feb 0.350 0.350 Range 0.057 0.05
0.354 0.328 Minimum 0.318 0.307
0.351 0.327 Maximum 0.375 0.357
0.354 0.326 Sum 24.527 23.378
0.361 U.324 Count 70 70
0.353 0.332
0.355 0.325
0.362 0.328
0.353 0.321
0.348 0.316
Mar 0.335 0.322
0.354 0.317
0.357 0.308
0.364 0.347
0.356 0.331
0.349 0.313
0.351 0.346
0.334 0.333
0.358 0.329
0.352 0.307
Apr 0.332 0.344
0.342 0.331
0.345 0.324
0.334 0.334
0.351 0.344
0.375 0.346
0.345 0.339
0.343 0.319
0.368 0.339
0.346 0.331
May 0.368 0.335
0.344 0.332
0.349 0.322
0.333 0.317
0.346 0.315
0.337 0.316
0.341 0.318
0.329 0.347
0.347 0.317
0.329 0.332
June 0.370 0.330
0.318 0.357
0.350 0.346
0.350 0.343
0.351 0.347
0.347 0.345
0.353 0.336
0.347 0.344
0.347 0.318
0.363 0.332
July 0.341 0.347
0.349 0.343
0.350 0.345
0.346 0.326
0.366 0.324
0.361 0.342
0.362 0.357
0.348 0.321
0.351 0.314
0.369 0.335
[59] Also, upon examination, it was found that the process of the invention resulted in reduced cellular contamination. To elaborate, it has been found that when beads are prepared in accordance with the manual method of the prior art, there is an issue with cells that do not become fully encapsulated. When the cells are cancer cells, 5 plaques, or tumor colonies form, and the beads in the culture with them must be discarded due to the contamination.
[59] Over an 8-month period, 56 batches of beads were made manually, each batch containing a number of Pétri dish cultures. At least one culture was contaminated in each batch. In contrast, 62 batches were prepared over the same period using the 10 method of the invention. Only 12 of those 62 batches showed any type of contamination.
EXAMPLE 5
[60] The following example details the production of three different groups of agarose coated, agarose bead containing islets.
[61] Islets were prepared from animais over two years of âge and with a history 15 of multiple parities.
[62] The pancreases of the animais were perfused with a collagenase/neutral protease (either Collagénase P, at 1.0 g/L, or Liberase MTF/Thermolysin, at 7.5 U/g pancréas), and 0.01 g/L DNase I, or 2.5 mg/pancreas pulmozyme solution, prepared in either Hanks Balanced Sait Solution (GBSS) or Cold Storage Purification Stock Solution.
[63] After quantification, islets were separated into 2000 IEQ aliquots, before being resuspended in a 0.5 ml solution of one of 1.5% Seakem Gold (“SG” hereafter, 0.8% SG, or 0.8% Litex (“Li” hereafter). An “IEQ” as used herein means an islet having a diameter of 150 pm. Hence, an islet with a diameter of 300 pm is 2 lEQs, while one with a diameter of 75 pm is .5 IEQ. Litex agarose possesses the following properties: a 25 gel strength > 1000 g/cm2 at a 1.5% gel of from 5.8 to 8.7 cP when a 1.5% solution was used, a gelling température of 40-43°C for a 1.5% solution, an EEO (electro endosmosis) value of from 0.06 to 0.12, and sulphate content < 0.30%. The solutions were prepared in minimal essential medium plus 25 mM HEPES.
[64] Suspensions were expelled beneath the surface of stérile minerai oil, to yield four, 0.125 ml spherical beads, approximately 5-6 mm in diameter, each of which contained 500 IEQ.
[65] These, uncoated agarose beads were cultured at 37°C, in a humidified, 5%
CO2 atmosphère. After 5-7 days, a second coat of 5%, SG agarose was applied, yielding agarose coated, islet containing agarose beads, with a final diameter of 8-9 mm.
[66] These beads were cultured at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphère until used in experiments which follow. They were placed in a culture medium (11 mM glucose, supplemented with 2.5% heat inactivated porcine sérum, and 1% 10 antibiotic/antismycotic). The culture medium was changed weekly, and samples of media were analyzed, 24 hours after change, every week, for assays discussed infra.
EXAMPLE 6
[67] As noted in the prior example, culture media samples were taken from the samples, and assayed for insulin content, using a commercially available porcine insulin 15 ELISA. The results are depicted in Figure 6. It will be seen that islets encapsulated in
0.8% Li outperformed both islets encapsulated in 0.8% SG, and 1.5% SG with respect to insulin production.
EXAMPLE 7
[68] The in vitro experiments presented supra were extended to in vivo 2θ experiments, as discussed herein.
[69] Adult (8 week old rats) were used in these experiments. Animais were divided into groups of “insulin only” Controls, or bead récipients. Ail animais received 65 mg/kg of streptozotocin via tail vein injection to induce diabètes.
[70] Presence of diabètes was confirmed by assaying blood of subject animais for non-fasting glucose levels. A level over 400 mg/dL of glucose for 3 consecutive days was taken to indicate diabètes was présent. Any animais which did not exhibit diabètes within 2 weeks received a second dose of streptozotocin, after which ail animais became diabetic.
[71] The animais chosen for receiving implants received the beads in accordance with Gazda, et al., Cell Transplant, 16:609-620 (2007), which is incorporated 5 by reference in its entirety. To elaborate, 12-13 week old animais were anesthetized, using isoflurane. Following a midline incision along the peritoneal cavity, beads were placed therein.
[72] The number of beads placed in each animal varied, depending upon the highest dose of insulin given to the particular animal over the 3 day period prior to the 10 implant, divided by the average insulin production per macrobead (based upon the insulin produced by the beads over the 4 week period prior to implantation). Mice received the amount of beads necessary to provide the exact insulin dose they had received prior to implantation (lx), or 1.7x that dose. Female and male animais received beads equal to lx, but only males received 1.7x, in part because male rats weight more than female rats.
[73] There were no significant différences seen in pre-implant insulin requirements with respect to the different implant types (1.5% SG, 0.8% SG, 0.8% Li); however, more macrobeads were required for 1.5% SG beads, and the fewest were required for 0.8% Li.
[74] Following implantation, the animais were maintained for 90 days, with 20 blood glucose and body weight being monitored regularly.
[75] Female mice (ail in the lx group) showed an immédiate, sustained normalization of blood glucose levels as compared to mice receiving insulin Controls. Male rats in the lx group, exhibited an immédiate, but temporary, improvement in blood glucose régulation, which retumed to pre-implant levels by about 30 days post-implant.
EXAMPLE 8
[76] Studies were carried out on the macrobeads after the récipient animais were sacrificed and examined for structural integrity and functional capacity.
[77] Gross examination showed that, only two of 1540 macrobeads recovered showed any structural damage.
[78] The foregoing examples describe various features of the invention, which relate to secretory cell-containing agarose macrobeads, coated with agarose, where the 5 agarose used for the macrobeads had the properties of Litex agarose, set forth supra.
[79] As set forth herein, the term “macrobead” refers to a structure that is essentially spherical, with a diameter of from about 4 to about 10-12 mm in diameter, most preferably from about 6 to about 8 mm in diameter. The second agarose layer is preferably from about 0.05 to about 5 mm in thickness, most preferably from about 0.5 10 mm to about 5 mm in thickness, even more preferably, from about 1.0 mm to about 3 mm, and most preferably, from about 1.0 mm to about 2.0 mm in thickness. The second agarose layer may, but need not be, the same agarose used to make the bead.
[80] “Macrobeads” is used as a preferred structure; however, any solid, agarose structure which encapsulâtes secretory cells, and is preferably coated with a second, 15 agarose layer, are features of the invention.
[81] The secretory cells may vary. Any cell or organelle which yields a désirable, secretory product may be encapsulated. Islets, cancer cells, and stem cells are exemplary of the types of materials which can be used. Each bead may contain a varying number of cellular organelles, for islets, for example, from about 50 to about 5000 islet 20 équivalents (“IEQs” hereafter), more preferably, from about 100 to about 2500 lEQs, even more preferably, from about 250 to about 1000, and most preferably, from about 475 to about 550 IEQs. About 500 IEQs is most especially preferred.
[82] Also a feature of the invention is an improved method for making macrobeads, regardless of the agarose used. Cells are mixed with agarose, and then 25 formed into a suspension which is in tum used to form a bead. The bead, e.g., a macrobead, is then coated with agarose, after which the resulting coated bead is dispensed into a sample of minerai oil at a température gradient, such that the bead contacts minerai oil at a higher température and drops to oil at a lower température. The beads may contain any cell type desired such as, but not being limited to secretory cells, cancer cells, islets, stem cells, such as pluripotent stem cells, and so forth
[83] In particularly preferred embodiments, “trumpet” and “straw” tools, as described herein, are used to remove the uncoated, and the coated beads, respectively.
[84] The température gradient of the minerai oil can vary. Preferably, the gradient is from 20°C to 50°C, i.e., the différence between the highest and lowest températures falls within this range. More preferably, the différence is from 20°C to 35°C.
[85] The highest température of the oil may vary, but is preferably between 10 20°C and 30°C, more preferably between 20°C and 35°C. Similarly, the lowest température may vary, and run from 0°C to -8°C, and more preferably, from 0°C to -2°C.
[86] Other aspects of the invention will be clear to the skilled artisan, and need not be elaborated further.
[87] The terms and expressions which hâve been employed are used as terms of 15 description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expression of excluding any équivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention.

Claims (16)

  1. We Claims:
    1. A method for producing a composition of matter comprising a sample of cells in an agarose containing bead, wherein said bead is coated with agarose, comprising:
    (a) mixing a first sample of agarose with said cells to form a suspension;
    (b) forming a bead from said suspension;
    (c) coating said bead with a second solution of agarose, and (d) dispensing said coated bead into a sample of minerai oil, wherein said sample of minerai oil is kept at a température gradient so that said bead moves from minerai oil at a higher température to minerai oil at a lower température.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are secretory cells.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are cancer cells.
  4. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are cancer stem cells.
  5. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are islet cells.
  6. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are stem cells.
  7. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said cells are embryonic stem cells.
  8. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said cells are pluripotent cells.
  9. 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising removing said bead from said suspension with a trumpet tool prior to coating said bead with a second solution of agarose.
  10. 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising removing said bead from said minerai oil with a trumpet tool.
  11. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said température gradient is from about 20°C to about 50°C, with a higher température at the start of the gradient.
  12. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein said higher température ranges from about 20°C to about 35°C.
  13. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said higher température is from about 20°C to about 30°C and said lower température is from about 0°C to about -8°C.
  14. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said higher température is from about 20°C to about 25°C and said lower température is from about 0°C to about -2°C.
    5
  15. 15. An apparatus useful in transporting an object from one point to another comprising a one piece construct having a hollow longitudinal axis, said hollow longitudinal axis having, at one end, a négative conical surface which joins said hollow longitudinal axis, and, at a second end, a means adapted to join a vacuum means, said means at the second end having a diameter greater than that of both 10 the longitudinal axis and the négative conical means.
  16. 16. An apparatus useful in transporting an object from one point to another comprising a one piece construct having a hollow longitudinal axis and two ends, a first end of which is adapted for connection to a vacuum means, and a second end adapted for receiving an object to be transported, said apparatus further 15 comprising an internai means adapted for réception of a connecting means for a source of a fluid, and a means for impeding a delivery device used to transport said fluid.
OA1201400204 2013-01-30 Improved Methode for Manufacture of Macrobeads OA19698A (en)

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
OA19698A true OA19698A (en) 2021-02-26

Family

ID=

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE47439E1 (en) Method for manufacture of macrobeads
CN105349517B (en) Encapsulation of pancreatic cells derived from human pluripotent stem cells
CN102803466B (en) Culture equipment, culture sheet and cell culture method
WO2007114351A1 (en) Novel cell culture method and methods of producing and collecting cell masses using the same
CN105229145A (en) The manufacture method of sheet cell culture
CN107922921A (en) The method of 3D printing tissue-culture model
KR20080031035A (en) Rotatable Perfused Time-varying Electromagnetic Force Bioreactor and Method Using It
RS61056B1 (en) Cell culture
EP1706103B1 (en) Three-dimensional mammalian ovarian follicular cell and ovarian follicle culture systems in a biocompatible matrix
OA19698A (en) Improved Methode for Manufacture of Macrobeads
AU2014202102A1 (en) Improved method for manufacture of macrobeads
CN119770728A (en) Modified polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer composite material bracket and preparation method and application thereof
JPH0870847A (en) Vessel for cell suspension culture
HK1199903B (en) Improved method for manufacture of macrobeads
KR20260025136A (en) Method for producing tissue-derived epithelial organoids and their uses
JP2015057071A (en) Method for producing sheet cell culture
JP7306647B2 (en) Grafts and their uses
CN121294141B (en) Cell microsphere forming device and forming method
JPH0576364A (en) Immobilized product of animal free cells, immobilization method and culture method
US20240218331A1 (en) Method for producing vascularized biological tissue
RU2809541C1 (en) Microdevice for cell culture
US11571496B2 (en) System and method for fabricating a cornea
Le et al. Isolating and growing fibroblast cells from threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
KR20250046236A (en) Systems and methods for manufacturing bioprinting fiber structures
US20060286666A1 (en) Methods and apparatuses for culturing stem cell using biomaterial shell