Classifications

• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42D—BLASTING
  • F42D3/00—Particular applications of blasting techniques
  • F42D3/04—Particular applications of blasting techniques for rock blasting
• • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
  • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
  • F42D—BLASTING
  • F42D1/00—Blasting methods or apparatus, e.g. loading or tamping

Definitions

• the present invention relates to a method of blasting using an adjustable, highly precise blasthole initiation system in combination with specific aspects of blast design to provide improved blast results, more specifically to control the rockpile (muckpile) profile associated with a blast.
• rockpiles of material which is thrown (or displaced) by the blast.
• the characteristics of the rockpile profile e.g. shape and displacement
• the present invention provides a method of blasting in which rockpile profile associated with a blast field is controlled by precise control of the initiation/detonation delay times between and/or within individual blastholes in the blast field, in addition to the control of one or more other important blast parameters, in particular the blasthole geometry, explosive charge and blast initiation location.
• This approach is fundamentally different from conventional blasting techniques which neither provide the adjustable delay times and high precision required nor generally vary the blasthole geometry, explosive charge and/or blast initiation location over a blast field specifically for the purpose of controlling the rockpile profile.
• precise control of blast delay time means control within a tolerance of less than one millisecond of the required and intended delay time between adjacent blastholes and/or within individual blastholes.
• This degree of control may be achieved using an electronic initiation system, as opposed to conventionally used non-electronic initiation systems.
• electronic initiation systems allow highly precise control of the delay between and/or within individual blasthole firings over the blast field and, in turn, this provides enhanced flexibility with respect to blast design such that the benefits of the present invention may be achieved.
• these systems are programmable and so provide the capability to obtain the required delay times, as opposed to conventional systems, which generally have a limited range of fixed delay times.
• the blast field is made up of a number of blastholes, and the invention resides in controlling the characteristics of the blastholes, particularly the blasthole diameter, geometry and explosive charge contained, in combination with precise control of the detonation delay between and/or within the blastholes.
• the invention will be illustrated by reference to this kind of blast field. It has been found that precise control of the delay between blasthole firings allows the effect of other aspects of blast design on rockpile profile to be manipulated and optimised. Any one or more of the blasthole characteristics may be employed in combination with precise firing delay control in order to achieve the desired rockpile in a given situation.
• the profile may be flattened or displaced forwards in certain areas or, alternatively, made to heave upwards or be minimally displaced in other areas as required to suit the mine excavation system.
• Enhancement (increase) of rockpile displacement in a desired direction may be achieved by manipulating the inter-hole delay between blastholes, as well as the in-hole initiation within specific blast geometries.
• these delays are controlled with great precision by using an adjustable, highly precise initiation system such as an electronic initiation system.
• Specific blast geometries to enhance the rockpile displacement in a particular direction include the use of an optimised blasthole pattern which is preferably a staggered pattern such that the ratio of inter-hole spacing along rows of blastholes (where the rows are taken to be perpendicular to the direction of required displacement) to the perpendicular distance between rows is in the range 1:2 to 3:2 and, preferably, in the range 7:10 to 6:5.
• the ratio is in the range 7:10 to 1:1.
• the rows are preferably drilled parallel to any pre-existing or newly-created free faces in the blast field which are perpendicular to the desired direction of displacement.
• the blasthole orientation may also be manipulated to enhance rockpile displacement.
• the blastholes are generally inclined with the hole toe upwards in the same direction as the required displacement at an acute angle to the vertical, typically in the range up to 45 degrees.
• the explosive masses and energies within the blastholes may also be manipulated to control rockpile displacement. Usually, for maximum displacement the explosive masses and energies are maximised within the constraints of local environmental considerations, such as the avoidance of excessive vibration or overpressure levels and hazardous rock ejections.
• the displacement in a desired direction may be increased by the use of highly precise short inter-hole delays along rows of blastholes (where the rows are generally perpendicular to the desired direction of displacement).
• the inter-hole delays are typically from 0 to 4 ms per metre of inter-hole spacing (where the spacing is defined as the hole separation in such rows).
• the precise delay interval chosen may depend upon factors such as rock type and condition, and blast geometry.
• the inter-hole delays are from 0 to 2 ms per metre of inter-hole spacing for most rock types.
• the specific inter-hole delay chosen from this range is the shortest delay possible that does not provide excessive vibration or blast damage.
• Use of a highly precise delay system such as an electronic initiation system, allows these delays to be controlled to within a tolerance of less than one millisecond.
• a further aspect of the invention for regions where muckpile displacement is to be enhanced is to use two or more such high precision initiators within each blasthole with a delay of two milliseconds or less, preferably zero, between them.
• one of these initiators is located close to the bottom, or toe, of the blasthole and the others are located further up the explosive column at regular intervals.
• rockpile displacement in the direction perpendicular to the rows is enhanced by the use of selected ratios of time delay between rows of holes (the inter-row delay) to the delay between holes along a row (the inter-hole or intra-row delay).
• this ratio will be in excess of 5:1 and, preferably, in excess of 25:1.
• the inter-hole delay time per metre of blasthole spacing is usually constant along each row, but may be varied, even between any pair of holes.
• the inter-row delay time per metre of rockpile burden may be kept constant or varied from row to row according to the muckpile profile required.
• the position of the primary initiator within blastholes and the delay between in-hole initiators within blastholes may also vary throughout the blast, according to the muckpile profile required.
• the design features mentioned above may be employed in areas of the blast where a flatter rockpile profile is required, or increased displacement in the desired direction.
• areas of the blast where a steeper profile is required, or decreased displacement in a selected direction this is achieved by quite different manipulations of the delay between and/or within blastholes within different specific designs of blast geometry, explosive charge and/or blast initiation location.
• Specific blast geometries to reduce the displacement in a particular direction include using a blasting pattern which preferably has larger spacing and burden distances than that used in areas where increased displacement is required.
• a similar effect may also be achieved by using as small a blasthole as possible while maintaining adequate rock fragmentation for subsequent mechanical excavation.
• the blasthole diameter may be reduced from that used in areas where increased displacement is required.
• the orientation of the blastholes may also have an influence on the displacement observed.
• the blastholes may be inclined at reduced angles to the vertical when compared with those areas in which increased displacement is required.
• the blastholes may be inclined at acute angles to the vertical as shallow as possible, including being angled away from the blast free face, while still effecting adequate rock fragmentation for excavation.
• the explosive masses and energies may be reduced to provide reduced displacement when compared with those areas in which increased displacement is required. The minimum explosive mass and energy must be used to effect sufficient rock fragmentation for subsequent mechanical excavation.
• the displacement in a particular direction may be decreased by the use of inter-hole delays along rows of holes greater than the inter-hole delays along rows where increased displacement is required.
• the inter-hole delay will be in the range 4 to 40 ms, for example 20 to 40 ms, per metre of inter-hole spacing.
• the preferred delay between holes in these areas is the longest delay that does not result in problematic disruption of later firing blastholes.
• displacement may be decreased further by using a ratio of delays between rows of holes (the inter-row delay) to the delays between holes along a row (the inter-hole or intra-row delay) which is lower than the corresponding ratio for areas in which increased displacement is required. Typically, for decreased displacement this ratio is in the range of 5:1 or less.
• the blast, or region of the blast where reduced displacement is required may also be initiated at locations distant from any pre-existing free faces, hence initiating the blast, or region of the blast, from the back towards the front. Multiple blast initiation locations may thus be used, in contrast to conventional practice, which seldom uses more than one blast initiation location.
• a particular refinement of the method of the invention, especially for use in areas where the full displacement of the rockpile is to be maximised, such as in cast blasting, without causing environmental problems such as excessive overpressure is to use longer inter-hole delays, preferably greater than 4 ms per metre of blasthole spacing in all or part of the front (or first firing) one or two rows and reverting to high precision shorter inter-hole delays (as specified above in the range 0 to 4 ms per metre of inter-hole spacing) in the latter part of the row or in subsequent rows.
• the overall displacement of the rockpile in the final direction of spoil may also be increased to increase the overall productivity of excavation by decreasing the distance through which material is moved by the excavator.
• the invention may also be used to provide flatter, more spread out rockpiles for improving front-end loader productivity.
• the invention may be used to provide steeper or taller rockpiles for improving productivity of certain equipment such as face shovels, or for increasing the rockpile voidage to enable easier digging.
• the invention may also be used to limit rockpile displacement in ore mines to enable improved ore/waste delineation and to maximise the concentration of ore recovered from the blast.
• the excavation process may also be enhanced by providing rockpiles in which a desired portion of the rockpile is located to provide easy equipment access while simultaneously providing an increased extent of material cast to final spoil in other parts of the rockpile.

Landscapes

• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Drilling And Exploitation, And Mining Machines And Methods (AREA)
• Earth Drilling (AREA)

Priority Applications (1)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Related Child Applications (1)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=3826655

Family Applications (2)

Family Applications After (1)

Country Status (7)

Cited By (4)

Families Citing this family (6)

Citations (16)

Family Cites Families (4)

• 2001
  • 2001-01-19 AU AUPR2628A patent/AUPR262801A0/en not_active Abandoned
• 2002
  • 2002-01-18 CA CA002436954A patent/CA2436954C/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2002-01-18 US US10/469,093 patent/US20040159258A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2002-01-18 ZA ZA200306415A patent/ZA200306415B/en unknown
  • 2002-01-18 EP EP02715309A patent/EP1360455A4/fr not_active Withdrawn
  • 2002-01-18 WO PCT/AU2002/000054 patent/WO2002057707A1/fr not_active Ceased
• 2003
  • 2003-08-21 CL CL200301690A patent/CL2003001690A1/es unknown
• 2007
  • 2007-02-09 US US11/704,248 patent/US7406918B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime

Patent Citations (16)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events