US22106A - Truss-bridge - Google Patents
Truss-bridge Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US22106A US22106A US22106DA US22106A US 22106 A US22106 A US 22106A US 22106D A US22106D A US 22106DA US 22106 A US22106 A US 22106A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- truss
- springs
- bridge
- iron
- frames
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 4
- 244000286663 Ficus elastica Species 0.000 description 3
- RRHGJUQNOFWUDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isoprene Chemical compound CC(=C)C=C RRHGJUQNOFWUDK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229920001195 polyisoprene Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 206010010254 Concussion Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009514 concussion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D15/00—Movable or portable bridges; Floating bridges
- E01D15/12—Portable or sectional bridges
- E01D15/133—Portable or sectional bridges built-up from readily separable standardised sections or elements, e.g. Bailey bridges
Definitions
- My invention consists in the application of springs to the bearings of either the posts, main braces, counter braces, iron rods of all descriptions, or to any compressed joint in trusses constructed, either of wood, iron, or wood and iron combined.
- the most convenient and available material for these springs is india rubber.
- the shape most generally required is the same as that of the ordinary india rubber car-springs of the market; that is, short solid cylinders, with holes through their centers, as represented by Figure 4. This is the shape most suitable for iron rods.
- Those for other compressed joints may be of a size and shape to suit the particular size and shape of the adjacent surfaces.
- the place of application of these springs in ordinary wood and iron truss-frames is most convenient, as represented by the drawings; that is, generally under the washers of the iron rods, as S. S. S. Figs. l, 2 and 3.
- Panels l and 2, of Fig. l represent a side vie-w of a Pratt truss-frame, and panels 3 and 4 the same of a Howe truss.
- Fig. 9. represents a truss beam.
- Fig. 3 represents an arch combined with a truss frame, in which the diierent panels show some of the various different modes in use of arranging the diagonal supports.
- S. S. S. are the points whe-re I think the springs may generally be most economically applied.
- E. E. E. are points where the springs might be applied with similar effects.
- the application at one point in the panel is considered to be generally suliicient. It may, however, be sometimes desirable to apply it at several.
- the truss-frame is rendered more elastic, and therefore less liable to be broken by al sudden strain, such as would be caused by the impact of a falling body.
- the durability of trussed bridges and other trussed structures is increased, by lessening the effects of the constant jar and violent concussions to which they are eX- posed. This is true of trusses made of any kind of material, as all wood, all iron, or both combined.
- the springs of themselves serve as dynamometers, by which the strains upon different parts of a truss can be more accurately ascertained and more correctly proportioned. This is especially desirable when two systems are combined, as an arch and truss frame.
- Fig. 3 shows an instance of this.
- the springs show when the strain produced by a counter-rod or brace upon a main rod or brace is equivalent to a given load, thus making it practicable so to load any trussed structure, by means of counters, that it shall remain inflexible under the maximum load admissible thereon. They enable this desirable quality in trusses to be gained, with greater safety than it is now done.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)
- Joining Of Building Structures In Genera (AREA)
Description
'UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE.
JOHN C. BRIGGS, OF CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE.
TRUSS-BRIDGE.
Specification of Letters Patent No. 22,106, dated November 23, 1858..
To all whom t may concern:
Be it known that I, JOHN C. Braces, of Concord, in the county of Merrimack and State of New Hampshire, have invented a new and Improved ode of Giving Elasticity to the Compressed Joints of Truss- Frames; and I do hereby declare that the following is a full and exact description thereof, reference being had to the accompanying drawings and the letters of reference marked thereon.
My invention consists in the application of springs to the bearings of either the posts, main braces, counter braces, iron rods of all descriptions, or to any compressed joint in trusses constructed, either of wood, iron, or wood and iron combined. The most convenient and available material for these springs is india rubber. The shape most generally required is the same as that of the ordinary india rubber car-springs of the market; that is, short solid cylinders, with holes through their centers, as represented by Figure 4. This is the shape most suitable for iron rods. Those for other compressed joints may be of a size and shape to suit the particular size and shape of the adjacent surfaces. The place of application of these springs in ordinary wood and iron truss-frames is most convenient, as represented by the drawings; that is, generally under the washers of the iron rods, as S. S. S. Figs. l, 2 and 3.
Panels l and 2, of Fig. l, represent a side vie-w of a Pratt truss-frame, and panels 3 and 4 the same of a Howe truss. Fig. 9. represents a truss beam. Fig. 3 represents an arch combined with a truss frame, in which the diierent panels show some of the various different modes in use of arranging the diagonal supports.
S. S. S. are the points whe-re I think the springs may generally be most economically applied. E. E. E. are points where the springs might be applied with similar effects. The application at one point in the panel is considered to be generally suliicient. It may, however, be sometimes desirable to apply it at several.
I have intended to represent by the drawing, the leading features of all the truss frames in use, and thus to show the applicability of my invention to all truss frames. There result from its use the following advantages:
l. The truss-frame is rendered more elastic, and therefore less liable to be broken by al sudden strain, such as would be caused by the impact of a falling body. For the same reason the durability of trussed bridges and other trussed structures is increased, by lessening the effects of the constant jar and violent concussions to which they are eX- posed. This is true of trusses made of any kind of material, as all wood, all iron, or both combined.
2. The springs of themselves (by having them previously tested and gaged) serve as dynamometers, by which the strains upon different parts of a truss can be more accurately ascertained and more correctly proportioned. This is especially desirable when two systems are combined, as an arch and truss frame. Fig. 3 shows an instance of this.
3. Unequal contraction and expansion of different parts of the same truss, from change of temperature, can take place without doing violence to each other, or making loose joints. The thickness of the springs should be such as to give suliicient elasticity for this purpose.
4. The springs show when the strain produced by a counter-rod or brace upon a main rod or brace is equivalent to a given load, thus making it practicable so to load any trussed structure, by means of counters, that it shall remain inflexible under the maximum load admissible thereon. They enable this desirable quality in trusses to be gained, with greater safety than it is now done.
lV hat I claim as my invention, and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is-
The application of india rubber, or equivalent springs, to the compressed joints of truss frames and truss beams, substantially in the manner and for the purposes described above.
JOHN C. BRIGGS. lVitnesses P. S. CHANDLER, JOHN A Bor'r.
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US22106A true US22106A (en) | 1858-11-23 |
Family
ID=2088392
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US22106D Expired - Lifetime US22106A (en) | Truss-bridge |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US22106A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070265273A1 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2007-11-15 | Bernat Vidal Juan | Pyrimidin-2-Amine Derivatives and Their Use as A2b Adenosine Receptor Antagonists |
-
0
- US US22106D patent/US22106A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20070265273A1 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2007-11-15 | Bernat Vidal Juan | Pyrimidin-2-Amine Derivatives and Their Use as A2b Adenosine Receptor Antagonists |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Nakashima et al. | Energy dissipation behaviour of shear panels made of low yield steel | |
| Peterson | Wood beams prestressed with bonded tension elements | |
| Fairbairn | VIII. Experiments to determine the effect of impact, vibratory action, and long-continued changes of load on wrought-iron girders | |
| US22106A (en) | Truss-bridge | |
| McMullen et al. | The torsional strength of rectangular reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined loading | |
| US2668444A (en) | Stress determining instrument | |
| Wisnewski et al. | Experimental determination of the fatigue behavior of dowel strips in ortho‐composite slabs for road bridges | |
| US25852A (en) | Tubttlak costhectiobr of bridces | |
| US26512A (en) | Platform-scale | |
| USRE739E (en) | Improvement in bridges | |
| Pérez et al. | Calibration of the response reduction factors used in Ecuador for steel SMRF | |
| US14313A (en) | Girder foe bridges | |
| US16446A (en) | Bridge | |
| US16728A (en) | Bridge-truss | |
| Bohannan et al. | Fatigue strength of finger joints | |
| US94529A (en) | Improved bridge | |
| US28240A (en) | John w | |
| US6230A (en) | Elliptical of oval truss-frame for bridgkes | |
| US14314A (en) | Arched trussed bridge | |
| US393433A (en) | Truss-bridge connection | |
| US24323A (en) | Truss for roofs | |
| US26019A (en) | Kailkoad-car speietg | |
| US20414A (en) | Bridge | |
| Glucklich | Static fatigue in concrete | |
| US621469A (en) | Ciiauncey n |