US3714287A

US3714287A - Silicone-acrylate soil release treatment for organic textiles

Info

Publication number: US3714287A
Application number: US00231002A
Authority: US
Inventors: J Campbell; K Lee
Original assignee: Dow Corning Corp
Current assignee: Dow Silicones Corp
Priority date: 1970-09-03
Filing date: 1972-03-01
Publication date: 1973-01-30
Anticipated expiration: 1990-01-30
Also published as: CH1284371A4; BE772087A; CH559278A5; GB1367666A; DE2144337C3; ATA771371A; US3677810A; DE2144337A1; AT353740B; CA953857A; DE2144337B2; CH568437B5

Abstract

Removal of stains during laundering of organic textiles is facilitated and superior hand is imparted to the fabric by applying thereto a combination of from 10 to 99 percent by weight of a polymethylsiloxane and from 1 to 90 percent by weight of a polymeric, unsaturated, water-soluble carboxylic acid. This combination works especially well in combination with aminoplast crease resistance textile resins. A typical formulation is 45 percent by weight of dihydroxyl dimethylolethylene urea resin, 27.5 percent by weight of a polydimethylsiloxane of 50,000 cs. viscosity and 27.5 percent by weight of polymethacrylic acid.

Description

United States Patent Campbell et a1. Jan. 30, 1973 [54] SILlCONE-ACRYLATE SOIL RELEASE I51 Int. Cl ..C08g 37/32, C08j l/40 TREATMENT FOR ORGANIC [58] Field of Search ..260/826, 138.8 F, 139.5 A

TEXTILES [56] References Cited [75] Inventors: James K. Campbell, Glamorgan,

Wales; Kenneth M. Lee, Bay City, UNITED T TES PATENTS Mlch 3,236,685 2/1966 Caldwell ..l17/138.8 [73] Assigneei Dtn v Corning Corpbi-ation, Midland,

i Primary Examiner-Samuel H. Blech Attorney-Robert F. Fleming, Jr. et a1. [22] Filed: March 1, 1972 211 Appl. N0.: 231,002 ABSTRACT Related U.S. Application Data Division of Ser. No. 85,702, Oct. 30, 1970, Pat. No. 3,677,810 which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No.

69,467, Sept. 3, 1970, abandoned.

10 Claims, N0 Drawings SILICONE-ACRYLATE SOIL RELEASE TREATMENT FOR ORGANIC TEXTILES This application is a division of application Ser. No. 85,702 filed Oct. 30, 1970, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,677,810, issued July 18, 1972, which application was a continuation in part of application Ser. No. 69,467 filed Sept. 3, 1970, now abandoned.

The problem with which this invention has to do is that of soil release or stain removal from fabrics during laundering. The term soil release as used herein refers to the phenomenon. This is to be distinguished from dry soiling or dry soil release which is particularly apropos to carpeting and drapes. In the latter one is primarily concerned with soil build-up while the fabric IS in use.

There is considerable debate in the industry as to whether the problem of this invention is due to the lack of removal of the stain by the water detergent mix during laundering or whether the soil or stain is removed and then redeposited during laundering. Applicants are not to be tied to either of these explanations or theories for the operativeness of their invention.

The problem to which this invention relates has become particularly acute with the advent of synthetic fibers such as polyester fibers which are oleophilic in nature and which do not wet well with water. It is also made particularly acute with the advent of aminoplast crease resistance resins which are applied to various types of fabric in order to prevent wrinkling. In both of these cases, or in a combination thereof, there is considerable difficulty in removing a stain, particularly oilbased stains from fabrics. Of the fabrics presently on the market the polyester based fabrics pose the worse problem. However, this invention is applicable to all types of organic fabrics such as nylon, acrylic fibers and cellulosic fibers, in general.

It is known particularly from U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,236,685 and 3,377,249, that polyacrylic acid polymers can be employed either alone or in conjunction with aminoplast crease resistance resins to enhance the soil release properties of fabrics. It is also known that silicones, in general, increase the soiling of fabrics by oil-based stains. This is shown, for example, in many publications such as one appearing in American Dyestuff Reporter," page 299, May 5, 1958, entitled WET-SOILING STUDIES ON RESIN TREATED COTTON FABRICS. This article shows that when soft acrylic finishes are placed on fabric the soiling is enhanced. It also shows in FIGS. 2 and 4 that a methylpolysiloxane alone enhances the staining of fabrics by oil based stains and that a combination of a methylpolysiloxane and an acrylate finish is worse than either alone. The article concludes that once soiled the silicone-acrylate finish on cotton cannot be cleaned and that the soiling is irreversible. This publication is acknowledged and the conclusions concurred in the Textile Research Journal, page 146, February, 1963, in an article entitled SOME OBSERVATIONS ON WET SOILING OF RESIN-TREATED COTTONS. Further statements as to the detrimental affect of silicones on soiling of textiles are found in the proceedings of the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) reported in American Dyestuff Reporter, Oct. 11, 1965, page 37. In discussing the effect of the surface energy of the textile treatment on soiling, the authors came to the conclusion that those materials having low surface energy such as silicones materially enhanced the soiling of the fabric.

In the light of these teachings it is quite obvious why the patentees in the aforementioned patents carefully avoided the mention of any silicone in connection with their soil release treatments.

Applicants have found, however, quite unexpectedly that a combination of the organosiloxanes defined hereinafter and polymeric carboxylic acids as defined hereinafter, produce soil release properties equivalent to or superior to those of the polymeric carboxylic acids alone. It has also been found that the combination of silicones and the polymeric carboxylic acids give far superior hand, particularly in connection with crease resistance resins than do the polymeric carboxylic acids alone. The presence of the silicone also greatly enhances the mechanical strength of the fabric which is often badly deteriorated by the use of aminoplast crease resistant resins. For example, the combination of the silicone and polymeric acid when applied in conjunction with the aminoplast resin improves the tear of 5 the fabric by percent or more and the flex abrasion by from 400 to 500 percent over the same fabric treated with the aminoplast resin alone.

This invention relates to a mixture of (A) an aminoplast textile resin and in amount sufficient to increase soil release of an organic fabric to which the mixture is applied, (B) a combination of( l from 10 to 99 percent by weight of a polymethylsiloxane containing at least one methyl group per silicon, the remaining substituents on the silicon being substantially all hydrogen or aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals of one to two carbon atoms and (2) from 1 percent to percent by weight of a polymeric, unsaturated, water-soluble carboxylic acid, the proportions of (1) and (2) being based on the combined weights of the two.

This invention also relates to the method of improving soil release of an organic fabric which comprises applying thereto the mixture of (l) and (2) of the preceding paragraph and thereafter drying the coating on the fabric.

The term drying includes curing the coating and merely removing the water or solvent under conditions where no curing occurs.

The types of silicones which are operative herein are dimethylpolysiloxanes, methyl hydrogen polysiloxanes, methylvinylsiloxane and methylethylsiloxane or copolymers of these. Preferably, the siloxane is a dimethylsiloxane, a methyl hydrogen siloxane or a dimethylsiloxane containing copolymerized therewith a minor amount i.e., 20 mol percent or less of methylvinylsiloxane or methylethylsiloxane. The siloxanes can be endblocked with hydroxyl groups or functional groups such as alkoxy, acetoxy, etc., or they can be endblocked with R SiO. units in which R is any hydrocarbon or halohydrocarbon radical. The viscosity of the siloxane is not critical and it can range, for example, from 100 cs. to non-flowing gums.

The polysiloxane can be cured on the fabric or not depending upon the ultimate use of the fabric. If the siloxane is to be cured one can use any of the conventional crosslinkers and catalysts commonly used to cure polysiloxanes. For example, one can cure hydroxyl endblocked polysiloxanes with crosslinkers such as Sil-l containing siloxanes, alkoxysilanes or alkoxy silicates, acyloxysilanes, ketoxime silanes (i.e. RSi(Ol-l=CR',); where R and R are hydrocarbon radicals) and amineoxy silanes using catalysts such as metal salts of carboxylic acids such as dibutyl-tin-diacetate or ferric octoate or alkyl titanates such as tetrabutyl titanate or amines. In addition, one can cure the siloxane via the interaction of SiH with Si alkenyl using such catalysts as chloroplatinic acid. The cure of the siloxane is not to be confused with the cure of the aminoplast resin although the two can be cured simultaneously, if desired.

When cure of the siloxane is not desired, the siloxane and polymeric acid are applied to the fabric without a curing catalyst for the siloxane and the coating is heated to remove any solvent or water.

The polymeric carboxylic acids used herein are polymers of unsaturated water-soluble carboxylic acids such as acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, itaconic acid, vinylacetic acid or fumaric acid. The polymeric carboxylic acid can be a homopolymer or it can be a copolymer of two or more types of such acids. In the case of vinylacetic or fumaric acid it is preferable to prepare a copolymer with either acrylic, methacrylic or itaconic acids. If desired, the polymeric carboxylic acid of this invention can also contain small amounts of other vinylicpolymers such as acrylic esters, styrene, vinylchloride, or the like.

The term combination of as used in the claims of this application means that the silicone and the polymeric carboxylic acid can be a copolymer or a mixture. Thus, for example, the polysiloxane can be prepared and then copolymerized with the unsaturated acid. by means of standard emulsion polymerization techniques or by means of standard solvent polymerization techniques. In such techniques the preferred catalyst is potassium persulfate. It is also preferable that the siloxane contain alkenyl groups if it is desired to prepare copolymers. However, the present invention operates perfectly well with mere blends of the polymeric carboxylic acid and the siloxane. In these circumstances the polysiloxane is prepared separately from the polymeric carboxylic acid, each being polymerized by conventional techniques. The two polymers are then blended in any convenient fashion. It has been found that this can be done satisfactorily by mixing the two polymers and then passing the mixture through a colloid mill. Preferably, the siloxane will be in the form of an emulsion.

If desired, the soil release treatment of this invention can be used in conjunction with aminoplast textile resins. These materials are well known articles of commerce. Examples of such resins are urea formaldehyde resins, melamine formaldehyde resins, ethylene urea formaldehyde resins, carbamate formaldehyde resins, amide formaldehyde resins, diurea formaldehyde resins and triazone formaldehyde resins.For a more extensive list of the specific aminoplast resins which are operative herein, one is referred to U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,249, columns 5 and 6, which are hereby incorporated in this application by reference.

The aminoplast resin can be cured on the textile by any of the conventional catalysts generally employed in commerce. These can be of the Lewis acid type, of the basic type or any other type desired. For a complete list of such catalysts columns 6 and 7 of the aforesaid patent are hereby incorporated by reference.

Of course, if desired, the aminoplast resin can be cured by other means such as by radiation.

The combination of this invention is applied to the fabric by any conventional means such as by padding, dipping or spraying. The concentration of the treating bath is not critical and can range from 0.1 to 5 percent or more of the combined weight of the siloxane and polymeric carboxylic acid. The aminoplast resin can be applied in the normal concentration used with the particular type fabric employed. When aminoplast resins are used the bath can contain conventional amounts of such resins such as from 2 to 30 percent or more shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,377,249.

The amount of the combination of l) and (2) on the dry fabric is not critical, nor is the relative amounts of the combination (1) and (2) and the aminoplast resin so long as the aforesaid combination is present in amount sufficient to impart soil release. In general, the wet pick up based on the dry weight of the fabric will run from 50 to percent of the weight of l) and (2).

It should be understood that (l), (2) and the aminoplast resin can be applied to the fabric in combination or each ingredient can be applied alone and in any order. Preferably the materials are applied simultaneously.

The soil release properties of this invention are obtained with any organic fabric such as cellulosic fabrics such as cotton, rayon, cellulose acetate or viscose; polyamide fibers such as nylon; polyacrylic fabrics such as polyacrylonitrile and polyester fibers such as those arrived from ethylene glycol and terephthalic acid; protein fibers such as wool and polyvinylic fibers such as those from copolymers of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride or polypropylene. It should be understood that blends of any of these types of fibers can be employed, if desired.

The numerical values of soil release shown in the following examples were obtained by the standard of soil release oily stain release AATCC Test Method l30- l969* (*Except in Example 3), which appears in the AATCC Technical Manual, page 223. The test was modified only to the extent that burnt motor oil, Sears chassis grease or salad oil were used in the place of Nujol brand mineral oil. Substitution is permitted by the standard test. Briefly, in this test the stain remaining on the garment after washing is compared to standards supplied by the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. A rating of 5 indicates excellent stain removal and the standards are graded down through 1 which represents a very poor stain removal.

The following trade names and their definitions appear in the examples infra. Triton X-lOO is nonyl benzene polyalkyleneoxide. Permafresh-l83 is dihydroxy dimethylol ethylene urea. Emulphogen BC-720 is tridecyloxypoly(ethylenoxy) ethanol. Abex 188 is an anionic surfactant.

In order that those skilled in the art may better understand how the present invention can be practiced, the following examples are given by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. All percents referred to herein are by weight and all viscosities measured at 25 C. unless otherwise specified.

EXAMPLE 1 An emulsion was prepared by polymerizing methacrylic acid with potassium persulfate in an emulsion of a copolymer of 98.5 mol percent dimethylsiloxane and 1.5 mol percent methylvinylsiloxane in proportions such that the emulsion contain a weight ratio of 50 percent polysiloxane and 50 percent polyacrylic acid. The resulting emulsion had a solids content of 13.7 percent. 26.7g. of this emulsion was mixed with 44.7g. of water, 0.3g. of Triton X-100, 25 g. of a 45 percent solids water solution of Permafresh-l83 and 3.5 g. of a 50 percent water solution of magnesium chloride. The resulting combination was applied to nylon fabric and cured at 250 F. for minutes. After one wash in accordance with the aforesaid standard test the rating from a Sears chassis grease stain was 5, and from burnt motor oil stain was 5. This indicates excellent removal of the stain in one wash.

EXAMPLE 2 60g. of methyl hydrogen polysiloxane was mixed with 136 g. of water and emulsified with 4 g. of Emulphogen BC-720. This gave a 30 percent solids emulsion. 25 g. of this emulsion was mixed with 98.8 g. of polymethacrylic acid water solution containing 7.5 g. of acid.

28.2 g. of the above mixture was mixed with 43 g. of water, 0.3 g. of Triton X-100, 25 g. of a 45 percent solution of Permafresh-l83, and 3.5 g. of a 50 percent solution of magnesium chloride. The resulting bath was applied to a 5050 blend of polyester-cotton fabric and dried for 5 minutes at 250 F. and then cured for 15 minutes at 250 F. After one wash the rating under the standard test for Sears chassis grease was 5 and for burnt motor oil was 4.

EXAMPLE 3 An emulsion of a copolymer of 98.5 dimethylsiloxane and 1.5 mol percent of methylvinylsiloxane having a concentration of 32 percent by weight siloxane was prepared. 56.6 g. of this emulsion was mixed with 312 g. of a 7.8 percent polymethacrylic acid solution. The mixture was put through a colloid mill at a setting of mils followed by 3 passes at a 5 mil setting.

32.4 g. of this mixture was mixed with 38.8 g. of water, g. of a 45 percent water solution of Permafresh-l 83, 0.3 g. of Triton X-l00 and 3.5 g. of a 50 percent magnesium chloride solution.

This mixture was applied to a white cloth composed of 50-50 polyester-cotton blend and cured at 250 F. for 15 minutes. The fabric was washed and stained in accordance with the aforementioned standard test. However, the stain removal was measured using a photovolt photoelectric cell measuring device which recorded the intensity of light reflected from the sample. The cloth treated with the above mixture was checked against the same untreated unstained cloth, the same untreated stained cloth and the same cloth which was treated with the Permafresh-l83 resin only and stained. Each sample was checked after one wash and after 23 washes.

cloth EXAMPLE 4 g. of 30 percent solids emulsion of a 25,000 cs. polydimethylsiloxane was mixed with 4 g. Abex 18S surfactant and the mixture warmed to 70 C. 10.5 g. of a 2 percent solution of potassium persulfate was added and then 25 g. of methacrylic acid over a period of 30 minutes. An additional 10.5 g. of 2 percent potassium persulfate was then added and the emulsion was heated for 30 minutes at 70 C. and then 30 minutes at 85 C. The resulting composition contained 50 weight percent of the combined silicone and polymethacrylic acid.

30.5 g. of the above emulsion was mixed with 45.7 g. of water, 0.3 g. of Triton X-lOO, 20 g. of a 45 percent water solution of Permafresh-l 83 and 3.5 g. of zinc nitrate solution. The bath contained 4 percent of the combination of silicone and polymethacrylic acid. The bath was applied to 50-50 blend of polyester and cotton and cured 5 minutes at 250 F. and then 15 minutes at 250 F. The fabric was stained with burnt motor oil and upon washing had much better stain removal than an identical fabric treated with a commercial acrylate soil release agent.

EXAMPLE 5 A 31 percent solids emulsion was made of a 5500 cs. copolymer of mol percent dimethylsiloxane and 20 mol percent methylvinylsiloxane. 79 g. of this emulsion was mixed with 4 g. of Abex 18S and 300 g. of water and heated to 70 C..under nitrogen. 10.5 g. ofa 2 percent potassium persulfate solution was then added, followed by 25 g. of acrylic acid over a 30 minute period. 10.5 additional grams of 2 percent potassium persulfate were then added and the mixture heated for 30 minutes at 70 C. and then 30 minutes at 85 C.

Thirty-one g. of this emulsion was mixed with 45.2 g. of water, 0.3 g. of Triton X-lOO, 20 g. of Permafresh-l83 (45 percent solids) and 3.5 g. of zinc nitrate. This mixture was applied to percent cotton fabric and cured at 250 F. for 15 minutes. The fabric was stained with burnt motor oil. It was washed in the standard manner and the soil release was better than that with a commercial acrylic soil release coating.

EXAMPLE 6 This example shows use without aminoplast resin. An emulsion was made of a copolymer of 98.5 mol percent dimethylsiloxane and 1.5 mol percent methylvinylsiloxane using dodecyl benzene sulfonic acid. The solids content was 32.2 percent by weight. 23.9 g. of this emulsion was blended with 100 g. of 7.7 percent solution of a polymethacrylic acid.

28.2 g. of this mixture was mixed with 7 1 .5g. of water and 0.3g. of Triton X-lOO and the resulting formulation was applied to a 50-50 polyester-cotton fabric and dried at 250 F. for 15 minutes.

The test with burnt motor oil showed a soil release of 2 after one wash. The untreated fabric had a rating of 1 after one wash.

EXAMPLE 7 This example shows use of 80 percent dimethylpolysiloxane and 20 percent by weight methacrylic acid.

95.7 g. of the silicone emulsion of Example 6 was mixed with 100 g. of the 7.7 percent solids polymethacrylic acid solution. 17.8 g. of the resulting mixture was combined 53.4 g. of water, 0.3 g. Triton X-100, 25 g. of Permafresh-183 (45 percent solids) and 3.5 g. of MgCl, solution (accelerator MX).

A 50-50 blend of polyester-cotton fabric was immersed in the composition and put through squeeze rolls at 40 psi pressure. The fabric was treated minutes at 250 F. The soil rating for burnt motor oil was 2 after one wash while the fabric with the Permafresh 183 alone was 1.

EXAMPLE 8 This example shows curing the siloxane. 3. g of a 35 percent solids emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane was mixed with 0.3 g. of methyltrimethoxy silane, 0.3 g. of a percent solids emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 26.3 g. of a 7.3 percent solids solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 69.2 g. of water.

This mixture was applied to a 50-50 polyester-cotton fabric and cured 20 minutes at 250 F. The fabric was tested and was found after one wash to have a stain rating of 2 against burnt motor oil and 3 against salad oil. The untreated fabric gave a rating of 1 for each stain.

EXAMPLE 9 This example also shows curing the siloxane. It further shows that at lower concentrations the polymeric acid improves cleanability with good hand characteristics being obtainable.

Eight compositions (A-H) were prepared and applied to a white 5050 polyester-cotton fabric. The fabric samples were dipped into the compositions, nipped between rollers with 40 psi of pressure, dried, and then oven cured for 15 minutes at 250 F. The fabric samples were then tested for soil release. The compositions employed are set forth below. Compositions A-C and a fabric sample without any composition were included for purposes of comparison.

Composition A consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, lg. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 0.1 g. of acetic acid and 95.6 g. of water.

Composition 8 consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 1.3 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 94.4 g. of water.

Composition C consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.5 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 6.5 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 89.2 g. of water.

Composition D consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 13 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 82.7 g. ofwater.

Composition E consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, l g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent'solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 26 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 69.7 percent water.

Composition F consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibuty1-tindilaurate, 39 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 56.7 percent water.

Composition G consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 65 g. of a 7.7

percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 31.7 g. ofwater.

Composition l-l consisted essentially of 3 g. of a 35 percent solids aqueous emulsion of a 100,000 cs. hydroxyl endblocked polydimethylsiloxane, 1 g. of methyltrimethoxysilane, 0.3 g. of a 20 percent solids aqueous emulsion of dibutyl-tin-dilaurate, 94.8 g. of a 7.7 percent solids aqueous solution of polymethacrylic acid, and 0.9 g. of water.

The test results appear in the following table.

Soil Release Ratings Composition Stain and 7 Hand A B C D E F G H None Unstained 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ketchup 3 3 3 5 v 5 5 5 5 Mustard 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 Grease l l l 2 3 3 4 4 Motor Oil 1 1 1 l 2 2 3 3 Hand E E E G P P P P E=Excellent. G=Good, P=Poor 'UNNUJ Ui dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polyfumaric acid.

7. The composition of claim 2 in which (1) is about 50 percent and (2) is about 50 percent.

8. The composition of claim 3 in which (1) is about 50 percent and (2) is about 50 percent.

9. The composition of claim 2 in which (1) is about percent and (2) is about 20 percent.

10. The composition of claim 2 in which (1) is about 17 percent and (2) is about 83 percent.

Claims

1. A mixture of A. an aminoplast textile resin and in amount sufficient to increase the soil release of an organic fabric to which the mixture is applied, B. a combination of

1. from 10 to 99 percent by weight of a polymethylsiloxane containing at least one methyl group per silicon, the remaining substituents on the silicon being substantially all hydrogen or aliphatic hydrocarbon radicals of one to two carbon atoms, and

2. from 1 to 90 percent by weight of a polymeric, unsaturated, water-soluble carboxylic acid, the proportions of (1) and (2) being based on the combined weights of (1) and (2).

2. The composition of claim 1 in which (1) is a dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polymethacrylic acid.

3. The composition of claim 1 in which (1) is a dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polyacrylic acid.

4. The composition of claim 1 in which (1) is a dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polyitaconic acid.

5. The composition of claim 1 in which (1) is a dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polyvinylacetic acid.

6. The composition of claim 1 in which (1) is a dimethylpolysiloxane and (2) is polyfumaric acid.

9. The composition of claim 2 in which (1) is about 80 percent and (2) is about 20 percent.