US6745032B1 - Transmission link optimization - Google Patents

Transmission link optimization Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US6745032B1
US6745032B1 US09/677,193 US67719300A US6745032B1 US 6745032 B1 US6745032 B1 US 6745032B1 US 67719300 A US67719300 A US 67719300A US 6745032 B1 US6745032 B1 US 6745032B1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
history data
handover
controller
mobile station
mobile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US09/677,193
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Antero Alvesalo
Markku Verkama
Jukka Virtanen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Intellectual Ventures I LLC
Original Assignee
Nokia Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nokia Inc filed Critical Nokia Inc
Assigned to NOKIA NETWORKS OY reassignment NOKIA NETWORKS OY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VERKAMA, MARKKU, VIRTANEN, JUKKA, ALVESALO, ANTERO
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US6745032B1 publication Critical patent/US6745032B1/en
Assigned to SPYDER NAVIGATIONS L.L.C. reassignment SPYDER NAVIGATIONS L.L.C. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NOKIA CORPORATION
Assigned to NOKIA CORPORATION reassignment NOKIA CORPORATION MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: NOKIA NETWORKS OY
Assigned to INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC reassignment INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC MERGER (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SPYDER NAVIGATIONS L.L.C.
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
    • H04W36/10—Reselecting an access point controller
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W92/00—Interfaces specially adapted for wireless communication networks
    • H04W92/04—Interfaces between hierarchically different network devices
    • H04W92/14—Interfaces between hierarchically different network devices between access point controllers and backbone network device

Definitions

  • the invention relates to triggering the optimization of a link between network elements controlling the radio channels of a mobile communication system and a mobile switching centre as a result of handover, and particularly to when the optimization is triggered.
  • Cellular communication systems are characterized in that mobile stations can freely move and connect from one cell to another within the area of the mobile communication system.
  • Crossover is just a re-registration to a new cell, when the mobile station does not have an ongoing call. If a mobile station has an ongoing call during crossover, the call must also be connected from one base station to another with as little disturbance to the call as possible.
  • Crossover performed during a call is called handover. Handover may also take place within a cell from one traffic channel to another.
  • handover types are described using the IMT-2000 system (International Mobile Telecommunication 2000) as an example system. It is one of the third-generation mobile communication systems. Another example of a corresponding system is Universal Mobile Communication System (UMTS). UMTS is being standardized in ETSI (European Telecommunication Standards Institute), whereas the IMT-2000 system is being standardized by ITU (International Telecommunication Union). These future systems are very similar in basic features.
  • the network architecture of the IMT-2000 system is illustrated in FIG. 1 . It describes the parts of the system that are most important for handover. Mobile switching centres MSC connect incoming and outgoing calls and control the radio network controllers RNC of their areas.
  • the mobile switching centre and the radio network controller are connected by referring to the mobile switching centre as the radio network controller's own mobile switching centre.
  • the radio network controllers RNC 1 and RNC 2 have the same own mobile switching centre MSC 1 and the radio network controller RNC 3 's own mobile switching centre is MSC 2 .
  • the radio network controllers RNC are responsible for the control functions related to radio access and control the base transceiver stations BTS in their area, through which the mobile stations are connected to the network over radio paths.
  • the details of the network structure bear no essential significance for the invention.
  • handover When a mobile station remains in the area of the same radio network controller RNC, the handover is called handover between base transceiver stations. When the radio network controller area changes, but the mobile station remains within the area of the same mobile switching centre MSC, the handover is called internal handover within a mobile switching centre. When the mobile station moves from the area of the first mobile switching centre MSC- 1 to the area of a second mobile switching centre MSC- 2 , the handover is called handover between mobile switching centres. Additionally, systems using code division multiple access (CDMA), such as the known third-generation mobile communication systems currently being developed, handover is either soft or hard.
  • CDMA code division multiple access
  • the mobile station can during handover be simultaneously connected to the network through several base transceiver stations, until one of them proves to be better than the others on the basis of its signal.
  • the mobile station is connected to the network through only one base transceiver station.
  • a connection is established between the mobile station and a mobile switching centre MSC.
  • the connection is established through a radio network controller RNC.
  • This radio network controller is called the serving RNC and other radio network controllers are drift RNCs.
  • the serving RNC is also called an anchor RNC.
  • the serving RNC acts for instance as a combining point, i.e. it handles the diversity combining in soft handover.
  • the connection to the switching centre is established by creating an lu link for the call, i.e. a speech channel between the serving RNC and its own mobile switching centre.
  • the serving RNC can be maintained by means of an interface lur between the radio network controllers.
  • a drift RNC can also be a serving RNC at the same time acting for instance as a combining point in soft handovers. According to present knowledge, when handover is completed between two radio network controllers RNC, the drift RNC becomes the serving RNC from which a new lu link is created for the call, and the old link is released.
  • the radio network controller which is the first serving radio network controller stays as the serving radio network controller and a new lu link is not created.
  • the problem with the above solution conforming to present knowledge is the continuous change of lu link, if the mobile station moves back and forth between two radio network controllers and causes an lu link optimization after each handover, or alternatively moves quickly from one area to another.
  • This is illustrated in the example in FIG. 1, in which a mobile station MS makes a call while being in area A 1 and moves to area A 2 during the call as indicated with the arrow.
  • the serving RNC is first RNC 1 and the lu link is lu 1 .
  • the mobile station moves to the area of radio network controller RNC 2 and the lu link is optimized to lu 2 .
  • the mobile station moves to the area of radio network controller RNC 3 and the lu link is optimized to lu 3 .
  • the optimization of the lu link to lu 2 uses up network resources unnecessarily.
  • the mobile station moves back and forth, for instance between the areas of base transceiver stations BTS 1 and BTS 2 , and causes an optimization of the lu link with every handover, network resources would be unnecessarily used.
  • RNC 2 radio network controller
  • the problem with the alternative solution is that network resources are unnecessarily used if the lu link is not optimized again. Network resources are especially misspent in the example in FIG. 1 when the mobile station moves from area A 1 to area A 2 , if lu 1 remains as the lu link even if it is under the control of a different mobile switching centre.
  • the problem is emphasized, if the RNC-RNC connections are not built separately and they utilize the same transmission resources as the MSC-RNC connections.
  • the invention is based on the idea that information, i.e. history data, is collected concerning handovers of a mobile station and after certain conditions based on the history data are fulfilled, the lu link between the mobile switching centre and a radio network controller is optimized again.
  • the method and system of the invention provide the advantage that unnecessary optimization of the lu link is avoided and the link is optimized only when the optimization saves network resources.
  • the mobile station performs handovers between radio network controllers normally, but to the network side the handover between the radio network controllers, i.e. the lu link optimization, is performed in a manner which optimizes the use of network resources.
  • the history data includes network information that is updated in connection with each handover. This provides the advantage that the conditions triggering optimization can be made versatile to better take different handovers into consideration.
  • the history data comprises a handover counter which is updated in connection with handovers between controllers.
  • the counter By means of the counter, it is very simple to detect handovers between controllers and react to them.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a mobile communication system of the invention
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 show a flow chart of radio network controller functions in the first preferred embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 4 shows a signalling diagram in the first preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover
  • FIG. 5 shows a signalling diagram in the second preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover
  • FIG. 6 shows a signalling diagram in the third preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover
  • FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a radio network controller of the first preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows a simplified IMT-2000 network structure described earlier in the text.
  • a mobile communication system implementing the functionality of the present invention comprises not only means required for prior art optimization of the lu link, but also means for maintaining and updating the history data and means for comparing the history data and the predefined condition(s).
  • the means are preferably located in the radio network controller RNC. The means or a part of them can also be located elsewhere, for instance in the mobile switching centre or in the mobile station.
  • the present invention can be applied to various handovers.
  • the invention is in no way related to the factors triggering handover of air interface or to which network element is the one deciding on the handover of a mobile station.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of the radio network controller functions in the first preferred embodiment of the invention in which the target cell of the handover is in the service area of a radio network controller.
  • the history data is maintained in the radio network controller RNC and the history data comprises both network information and a handover counter. Additionally, the history data is updated in the radio network controller in which service area the target cell is. The history data could also be updated in the radio network controller in which service area the originating cell is.
  • the initial situation in FIG. 2 is that a radio network controller receives a handover request (ho request) whose target base transceiver station BTS is under the control of the radio network controller.
  • a handover request whose target base transceiver station BTS is under the control of the radio network controller.
  • step 201 it is checked if the originating base transceiver station is under the control of the radio network controller. If the originating base transceiver station is not under the control of the radio network controller, in step 202 it is checked if this is a soft handover (sho). If the handover request is for a soft handover, in step 203 a branch acknowledgement is transmitted. Naturally, this happens on the condition that the radio network controller can accept the soft handover and does not have to refuse it for instance due to misspending of resources.
  • the mobile station is commanded to generate a hard handover.
  • history data is received from the RNC in which area the originating cell is.
  • the network information in the history data is updated.
  • the network information is updated by adding as the latest network information data on the base transceiver currently serving the mobile station, information on the radio network controller itself and on its own mobile switching centre.
  • the network information can also include information on when handover has been made.
  • the handover counter is updated, as this concerns handover between radio network controllers. In this embodiment it does not matter, whether it is a case of internal handover within a mobile switching centre or handover between mobile switching centres.
  • these can also be taken into account for instance by using a separate counter for handovers between mobile switching centres or by increasing the handover counter reading with figures of different size for different handover types.
  • step 207 it is checked if the condition is fulfilled or, if there are several conditions, whether one of them is fulfilled.
  • An operator can freely define the conditions and there is no maximum limit to them. However, there must always be at least one condition.
  • the condition can, at its simplest, be just a certain value of the handover counter, for instance 2 , or a minimum time elapsed from the previous handover.
  • a condition may include complex expressions, for instance as follows: if the mobile switching centre has changed or if the RNC has stayed the same during the last two handovers, but the third last handover was performed in the area of another RNC, the lu link is optimized. If the condition was not fulfilled in step 207 , the next handover will be waited for. If the condition or one of the conditions was fulfilled, the handover counter is reset to zero in step 208 , the lu link is optimized by signalling a speech channel open to the mobile switching centre in step 209 , after which in step 210 a command is sent to release the old lu link. In one embodiment, also the network information or a part of it is reset to zero after the condition is fulfilled.
  • step 202 If the received handover request is for a hard handover (step 202 ), a command is sent in step 211 to perform a hard handover (hho). After this, in step 212 history data is requested from the RNC in whose area the originating cell is, and operation moves to step 204 in which the requested history data is received. From step 204 , operation continues as described above.
  • step 201 If the handover is an internal one within a radio network controller, operation moves from step 201 to step 213 in which normal handover steps are performed. After handover has been performed, the network information is updated in step 214 . After the update, operation moves to step 207 in which it is checked if the condition or one of the conditions is fulfilled. From step 207 , operation continues as described above.
  • the initial situation in FIG. 3 is that a radio network controller receives a handover request (ho request) whose target base transceiver station is not under the control of the radio network controller. This means that the originating base transceiver station is under the control of the radio network controller.
  • the handover request is forwarded to the radio network controller whose base transceiver station is the target base transceiver station. (It is assumed here that the radio network controller can accept a soft handover and does not have to refuse it for instance due to misspending of resources. In such a case, the mobile station is commanded to generate a hard handover.)
  • step 302 it is checked if the handover request is for soft handover (sho).
  • step 203 branch acknowledgement is transmitted and after some time, in step 304 a request to release the radio network controller's own branch is received.
  • step 305 an acknowledgement for branch release is sent and after this, the entire history data is sent in step 306 .
  • the lu link release command is received in step 307 and the lu link is released in step 308 .
  • step 309 a handover acknowledgement is transmitted. After this in step 310 , a request for the history data is received and from there, operation moves to step 306 in which the history data is sent. From step 306 , operation continues as described above.
  • the steps described above in FIGS. 2 and 3 are not in an absolutely chronological order and some of the steps can be executed simultaneously or deviating from the given order. Other normal functions related to handover and lu link optimization can also be executed between the steps. Some of the steps can also be left out. It is essential to update the history data at some point and to check after the update if the condition is fulfilled. In one embodiment, it is not necessary to separately request the history data in connection with hard handovers, as the radio network controller sends all of the history data after forwarding the handover acknowledgement. In the embodiments in which the history data does not include network information, steps relating to updating network information are not performed. Correspondingly in the embodiments in which the history data does not comprise a handover counter, steps relating to updating it are not performed.
  • the radio network controller of the target cell sends updates to the history data to the radio network controller of the originating cell up until the lu link is optimized.
  • the radio network controller If the history data is maintained in the mobile station, steps related to updating are performed there and the radio network controller requests the history data during each handover to check if the condition or one of the conditions is fulfilled.
  • the radio network controller also sends updates to the history data to the mobile station during each handover.
  • the radio network controller can request only some of the history data from the mobile station even though it sends all updates to the history data. This provides the advantage that different conditions are possible for different radio network controllers and yet the amount of data transmitted through the air path is minimized.
  • the radio network controller If the history data is maintained in the mobile switching centre, steps relating to updating are performed there and the radio network controller sends updates to the history data to the mobile switching centre during each handover. If the check of the condition(s) and triggering of the lu link optimization are also performed in the mobile switching centre, the radio network controller does not have to request the history data or a part of it during each handover to check if the condition or conditions are fulfilled.
  • FIG. 4 shows the signalling of the first preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover. It is assumed for simplicity's sake that the mobile station is during soft handover only connected to two base transceiver stations of which one is under the control of the radio network controller RNC 1 RNC 2 .
  • the serving RNC of the mobile station is RNC 1 from which an lu link is established to its own mobile switching centre.
  • the mobile station requests in message 4 - 1 for another branch for soft handover from the serving radio network controller RNC 1 .
  • the serving radio network controller RNC 1 detects that the target cell of the soft handover is in the area of the radio network controller RNC 2 and sends a soft handover request to it in message 4 - 2 .
  • RNC 2 accepts the soft handover and sends a branch addition permission in message 4 - 3 to RNC 1 which then forwards the permission to the mobile station MS in message 4 - 4 .
  • the branch between the base transceiver station in the service area of RNC 1 and the mobile station is released. The branch is released by sending from the mobile station MS a request to release the soft handover branch in message 4 - 5 .
  • RNC 1 When RNC 1 identifies the request to release the branch and detects that the mobile station is about to leave its service area, it sends all history data to RNC 2 in message 4 - 6 , because the branch to be released was in a handover which was performed in the area of RNC 2 . At the same time, RNC 1 sends a command in message 4 - 7 to the mobile station MS to release the branch.
  • the radio network controller RNC 2 When the radio network controller RNC 2 receives the history data, it updates it to correspond to the new situation as described in FIG. 2 . After the update, the radio network controller checks in step 4 - 8 if one of the predefined handover conditions is fulfilled. In the example shown in FIG. 4, the condition was fulfilled, in which case in step 4 - 8 the lu link is optimized by signalling a speech channel open to the radio network controller RNC 2 's own mobile switching centre. Normal lu connection creation procedures can be used when signalling this lu link. When the lu link is optimized, a command is sent in message 4 - 9 to the radio network controller RNC 1 to release the lu link reserved for the mobile station between RNC 1 and its own mobile switching centre.
  • the signalling described in FIG. 4 changes so that messages 4 - 1 , 4 - 2 , 4 - 3 and 4 - 4 become messages for hard handover and messages 4 - 5 and 4 - 7 are not received. Instead, message 4 - 6 is sent only after RNC 2 sends RNC 1 a message requesting the history data. Step 4 - 8 and message 4 - 9 remain unchanged.
  • FIG. 5 shows the signalling of the second preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover.
  • the history data is maintained in the mobile station and the RNC which has an lu link to the mobile switching centre checks the condition or conditions. It is again assumed for simplicity's sake that the mobile station is during soft handover connected to only two base transceiver stations of which one is under the control of the radio network controller RNC 1 and the other correspondingly under the control of the radio network controller RNC 2 .
  • the serving RNC of the mobile station is RNC- 1 which has an lu link to its own mobile switching centre.
  • the mobile station asks in message 5 - 1 for a second branch for soft handover from the serving radio network controller RNC 1 .
  • the serving radio network controller RNC 1 detects that the soft handover target cell is in the area of the radio network controller RNC 2 and sends a soft handover request to it in message 5 - 2 .
  • RNC 2 accepts the soft handover and sends a branch addition permission in message 5 - 3 to RNC 1 which forwards the permission to the mobile station MS in message 5 - 4 .
  • At least one of the network controllers adds updates to the history data, i.e. update data, to the permission.
  • the network controller RNC 2 adds to the permission update data on itself, its mobile switching centre and the base transceiver station in whose area the soft handover branch is required.
  • the network controller RNC 1 adds to the permission data increasing the handover counter reading, because this is a handover between radio network controllers.
  • RNC 1 When RNC 1 identifies the request to release the branch, it requests history data from the mobile station MS in message 5 - 6 .
  • RNC 1 can ask for all history data or just a certain part of the data, for instance only the history data of the mobile switching centres or the value in the handover counter, depending on what data it needs to check the condition or conditions triggering the lu optimization.
  • the mobile station sends the requested history data to RNC 1 in message 5 - 7 . Having received the history data, RNC 1 sends a command in message 5 - 8 to the mobile station MS to release the branch.
  • the radio network controller RNC 1 checks if one of the predefined handover conditions is fulfilled. In the example in FIG.
  • the condition is fulfilled, which means that a command to optimize the lu link is sent in message 5 - 10 to the radio network controller RNC 2 to whose area the mobile station has moved.
  • RNC 2 optimizes the lu link in step 5 - 11 by signalling a speech channel open to its own mobile switching centre. After this, RNC 2 informs the radio network controller RNC 1 in message 5 - 12 that the lu link optimization is completed. Having received the message, RNC 1 releases the lu link reserved for the mobile station to its own mobile switching centre.
  • FIG. 6 shows the signalling of the third preferred embodiment of the invention during soft handover.
  • This embodiment is particularly well suited for situations where the lu link should be in the radio network controller which has the most soft handover branches. It is assumed for simplicity's sake that the mobile station is during soft handover connected to only two base transceiver stations of which one is under the control of the radio network controller RNC 1 and the other correspondingly under the control of the radio network controller RNC 2 .
  • the serving RNC of the mobile station is RNC 1 which has an lu link to its own mobile switching centre. The mobile station asks in message 6 - 1 for another branch for soft handover from the serving radio network controller RNC 1 .
  • the serving radio network controller RNC 1 detects that the soft handover target cell is in the area of the radio network controller RNC 2 and sends a soft handover request to it in message 6 - 2 .
  • RNC 2 accepts the soft handover and sends a branch addition permission in message 6 - 3 to RNC 1 which in step 6 - 4 updates the history data with the information on the branch addition and, at the same time, checks if the condition is fulfilled. In this example, the condition is not yet fulfilled. After this, RNC 1 forwards the permission in message 6 - 5 to the mobile station MS.
  • the branch between the base transceiver station in the service area of RNC 1 and the mobile station is released.
  • the branch is released by sending from the mobile station MS a request in message 6 - 6 to release the soft handover branch.
  • RNC 1 identifies the request to release the branch and sends a command to the mobile station MS in message 6 - 7 to release the branch.
  • RNC 1 updates the history data to correspond to the new situation as described in FIG. 2 .
  • the radio network controller checks in step 6 - 8 if one of the predefined handover conditions is fulfilled. In the example shown in FIG.
  • RNC 1 sends all history data to RNC 2 in message 6 - 9 .
  • RNC 1 takes care of the lu link optimization with normal procedures in step 6 - 10 .
  • the lu link is established from RNC 2 to its own mobile switching centre and the lu link between RNC 1 and its own centre has been released.
  • RNC 1 receives history data updates from RNC 2 in an update message (not shown in the figure) and executes step 6 - 8 , i.e. updates the history data and checks the condition.
  • RNC 1 sends message 6 - 9 and executes step 6 - 10 .
  • step 6 - 4 If the condition had been fulfilled in step 6 - 4 , message 6 - 9 would have been sent after sending message 6 - 5 or simultaneously with it. After this, step 6 - 10 would have been executed. After receiving message 6 - 6 , RNC 1 would have sent message 6 - 7 to the mobile station and a message for updating the history data to RNC 2 in which the history data would have been updated.
  • the signalling described in FIG. 6 changes so that messages 6 - 1 , 6 - 2 , 6 - 3 and 6 - 5 become messages for hard handover, message 6 - 6 is not received and step 6 - 8 is not executed. If the condition is fulfilled in step 6 - 4 , message 6 - 9 is sent and step 6 - 10 is executed. If the condition is not fulfilled in step 6 - 4 , RNC 1 receives history data updates in an update message from RNC 2 and then executes step 6 - 4 , i.e. updates the history data and checks the condition. When the condition is fulfilled, RNC 1 sends message 6 - 9 and executes step 6 - 10 . For clarity's sake, FIGS.
  • the signalling described above is not restricted to whether the handover between the radio network controllers is internal within a mobile switching centre or between mobile switching centres, because each radio network controller optimizes the lu link with its own mobile switching centre.
  • FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a radio network controller of the first preferred embodiment of the invention.
  • the radio network controller refers to a network element which controls the use of the radio interface of its area. In different systems different names are used for these network elements, for instance in the GSM system, these are called base station controllers (BSC).
  • BSC base station controllers
  • the radio network controller of the present invention does not require major changes to a prior art radio network controller.
  • the radio network controller of the invention comprises at least a connection part 1 through which it receives messages from mobile switching centres, other radio network controllers, base transceiver stations and through base transceiver stations from mobile stations.
  • Connection part 1 also connects calls between a mobile switching centre and a mobile station.
  • the operator can set conditions to implement the lu link optimization and update them.
  • the condition can be different for each radio network controller and they need not be inter-dependent, if the operator so wishes. This provides the advantage that the structure of the network infrastructure can extremely well be taken into account when defining the conditions thus enabling an efficient optimization of network resources.
  • the radio network controller of the invention also comprises a control part 2 which handles the prior art functions of the radio network controller.
  • the control part 2 is adapted to check the condition or conditions triggering the optimization of the lu link, and when the condition is fulfilled, to optimize the lu link in one of the ways described above.
  • the control part 2 can also be adapted to update the history data maintained in the memory of the radio network controller.
  • the control part 2 can also be adapted to transmit updates to the history data to another radio network controller.
  • the control part 2 is adapted to request history data from a mobile station and to add to the messages sent to mobile stations updates to the history data as described above.
  • the radio network controller of the first preferred embodiment also comprises enough memory 3 to maintain the history data.
  • the subscriber-specific history data 31 comprises in the first preferred embodiment a handover counter 311 and network information 312 .
  • the network information includes data on the base transceiver stations BTS, the radio network controller RNC and the mobile switching centre MSC of the N last handovers. When all memory locations reserved for network information are full, the oldest network information is deleted and the newest inserted.
  • History data can also comprise only the handover counter or merely network information.
  • Network information can include only a part of the above-mentioned data and, in addition to it, other data, such as the handover execution time or information on the existing branches of the call and their number per radio network controller. The number of branches in a soft handover can form the condition triggering the lu link optimization.
  • History data can also include information on what kind of channels a mobile station has or has had at a certain time.
  • the mobile station of the present invention does not require major changes to a prior art mobile station.
  • the mobile station of the invention is adapted to maintain history data on its roaming, receive updates to the history data from the mobile communication network during handover and update the history data it maintains with the received data.
  • the mobile station is also adapted to receive a request for the history data and advantageously send only the part of the history data that is requested.
  • history data can be collected and updated also in connection with location updating.
  • the invention is also not restricted to the alternative where the history data is maintained in one place.
  • the maintenance of history data can also be distributed between the mobile station and the serving radio network controller for instance so that the mobile station maintains the network information and the radio network controller the handover counter. A corresponding distribution can also be made between the mobile switching centre and the radio network controller.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Cable Accessories (AREA)
  • Optical Communication System (AREA)
  • Optical Couplings Of Light Guides (AREA)
  • Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
US09/677,193 1998-04-03 2000-10-02 Transmission link optimization Expired - Lifetime US6745032B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI980773 1998-04-03
FI980773A FI106606B (fi) 1998-04-03 1998-04-03 Matkapuhelinkeskuksen ja radioverkko-ohjaimen välisen linkin optimointi
PCT/FI1999/000280 WO1999055110A2 (en) 1998-04-03 1999-04-01 Transmission link optimization

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI1999/000280 Continuation WO1999055110A2 (en) 1998-04-03 1999-04-01 Transmission link optimization

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US6745032B1 true US6745032B1 (en) 2004-06-01

Family

ID=8551463

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/677,193 Expired - Lifetime US6745032B1 (en) 1998-04-03 2000-10-02 Transmission link optimization

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US6745032B1 (de)
EP (1) EP1068759B1 (de)
AT (1) ATE326820T1 (de)
AU (1) AU3150499A (de)
DE (1) DE69931361T2 (de)
FI (1) FI106606B (de)
WO (1) WO1999055110A2 (de)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020039901A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-04-04 Yoshihiro Sugimoto Mobile communication terminal apparatus, control circuit, and handoff control method
US20020068570A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-06 Nischal Abrol Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US20030013446A1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2003-01-16 Serge Haumont Serving network entity relocation
US20030036387A1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2003-02-20 Andras Kovacs Relocation method, system and network element
US20030190930A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-09 Lim Seau Sian Method in a third generation or higher telecommunications network of updating other radio network controllers controlling neighbour cells with information on a change or changes relating to a first cell, and corresponding apparatus
US20040082337A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-04-29 Evolium S.A.S. Method and a system for managing the changing of resources in a communications network
US20040096041A1 (en) * 2000-10-09 2004-05-20 Mark Beckmann Method for determining the position of at least one subscriber terminal of a radio communications system, and a corresponding radio communications system
US20040137901A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-07-15 Ryutaro Hamasaki Vertical handover method by IP multicast
US6901065B1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2005-05-31 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Packet transmission in a UMTS network
US20060128384A1 (en) * 2004-12-10 2006-06-15 Cisco Technology, Inc., A Corporation Of California Location detection and network awareness for multi-mode/multi-radio mobile devices
US20070161374A1 (en) * 2006-01-11 2007-07-12 Airnet Communications Corporation Co-channel handover in a cellular network
US20090109857A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Microsoft Corporation Resource connection monitor utility
US20090181685A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2009-07-16 Hannes Ekstrom Method and apparatus for communication
US20090268689A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2009-10-29 Fu Yusun Forwarding learnt state information to target node at mobility
US20100210271A1 (en) * 2007-08-13 2010-08-19 T-Mobile International Ag Method for preventing ping-pong handover in mobile radio networks
US20100298022A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2010-11-25 France Telecom Configuration of radio coverage
US20130115960A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2013-05-09 Airwalk Communications, Inc. Combined base transceiver station and base station controller handoff
US9351219B1 (en) * 2015-03-21 2016-05-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Apparatus, system, and method for predicting roaming patterns of mobile devices within wireless networks

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE0101846D0 (sv) 2001-05-22 2001-05-22 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Method and system of retransmission
GB2378092B (en) * 2001-07-27 2003-11-05 Motorola Inc Delivery of broadcast information to a mobile station in a radio communication system
US8619718B2 (en) 2002-04-05 2013-12-31 Interdigital Technology Corporation Method and apparatus for coordinating a radio network controller and node B resource management for high speed downlink packet data service
EP1550322A1 (de) 2002-10-08 2005-07-06 Nokia Corporation Verfahren zur optimierung von betriebsmitteln in einem funksystem und funksystem
GB0619409D0 (en) * 2006-10-02 2006-11-08 Vodafone Plc Telecommunications networks
US20150038140A1 (en) * 2013-07-31 2015-02-05 Qualcomm Incorporated Predictive mobility in cellular networks
US9474000B2 (en) 2013-07-31 2016-10-18 Qualcomm Incorporated Handover and reselection searching using predictive mobility

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5305466A (en) 1990-02-20 1994-04-19 Nec Corporation Location registration and paging procedure for mobile communication
EP0701382A1 (de) 1994-09-08 1996-03-13 AT&T Corp. Verfahren und zellulären Kommunikationssystemen basierend auf Mobilität und Telekommunikations-Verkehrsstatistik, die durch mobile Einheiten ermittelt wird
WO1998018282A2 (en) 1996-10-24 1998-04-30 Northern Telecom Limited Cmda inter-mobile switching center soft hand-off
US5822696A (en) * 1996-10-24 1998-10-13 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Selecting a communications channel for a mobile station based on handover intensity
EP0898438A2 (de) 1997-08-20 1999-02-24 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Verfahren und System um einen Funkübertragungsnetzwerk zu steuern und Funkübertragungsnetzwerk steuerung
US6223042B1 (en) * 1997-06-26 2001-04-24 At&T Wireless Services Inc Method of intelligent roaming using network information
US6377787B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 2002-04-23 At&T Wireless Services, Inc. Method for categorization of multiple providers in a wireless communications service environment
US6411807B1 (en) * 1996-02-05 2002-06-25 At&T Wireless Service, Inc. Roaming authorization system
US6456652B1 (en) * 1998-03-28 2002-09-24 Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. Method for optimizing forward link coverage in code division multiple access (CDMA) network
US6510319B2 (en) * 1998-02-05 2003-01-21 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for optimizing forward link power levels during soft handoffs in a wireless telecommunications network

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5305466A (en) 1990-02-20 1994-04-19 Nec Corporation Location registration and paging procedure for mobile communication
EP0701382A1 (de) 1994-09-08 1996-03-13 AT&T Corp. Verfahren und zellulären Kommunikationssystemen basierend auf Mobilität und Telekommunikations-Verkehrsstatistik, die durch mobile Einheiten ermittelt wird
US6411807B1 (en) * 1996-02-05 2002-06-25 At&T Wireless Service, Inc. Roaming authorization system
US6377787B1 (en) * 1996-06-28 2002-04-23 At&T Wireless Services, Inc. Method for categorization of multiple providers in a wireless communications service environment
WO1998018282A2 (en) 1996-10-24 1998-04-30 Northern Telecom Limited Cmda inter-mobile switching center soft hand-off
US5822696A (en) * 1996-10-24 1998-10-13 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Selecting a communications channel for a mobile station based on handover intensity
US6223042B1 (en) * 1997-06-26 2001-04-24 At&T Wireless Services Inc Method of intelligent roaming using network information
EP0898438A2 (de) 1997-08-20 1999-02-24 Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd. Verfahren und System um einen Funkübertragungsnetzwerk zu steuern und Funkübertragungsnetzwerk steuerung
US6510319B2 (en) * 1998-02-05 2003-01-21 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method for optimizing forward link power levels during soft handoffs in a wireless telecommunications network
US6456652B1 (en) * 1998-03-28 2002-09-24 Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. Method for optimizing forward link coverage in code division multiple access (CDMA) network

Cited By (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6901065B1 (en) * 1999-10-19 2005-05-31 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Packet transmission in a UMTS network
US20030013446A1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2003-01-16 Serge Haumont Serving network entity relocation
US6955918B2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2005-10-18 Nokia Corporation Serving network entity relocation
US20020039901A1 (en) * 2000-10-02 2002-04-04 Yoshihiro Sugimoto Mobile communication terminal apparatus, control circuit, and handoff control method
US6934545B2 (en) * 2000-10-02 2005-08-23 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Mobile communication terminal apparatus, control circuit, and handoff control method
US20040096041A1 (en) * 2000-10-09 2004-05-20 Mark Beckmann Method for determining the position of at least one subscriber terminal of a radio communications system, and a corresponding radio communications system
US7860061B2 (en) 2000-12-06 2010-12-28 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US7079511B2 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-07-18 Qualcomm, Incorporated Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US7561555B2 (en) 2000-12-06 2009-07-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US20020068570A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-06 Nischal Abrol Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US20060187883A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-08-24 Nischal Abrol Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US20060165038A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-07-27 Nischal Abrol Method and apparatus for handoff of a wireless packet data services connection
US7215958B2 (en) * 2001-08-20 2007-05-08 Nokia Corporation Relocation method, system and network element
US20030036387A1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2003-02-20 Andras Kovacs Relocation method, system and network element
US20030190930A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-09 Lim Seau Sian Method in a third generation or higher telecommunications network of updating other radio network controllers controlling neighbour cells with information on a change or changes relating to a first cell, and corresponding apparatus
US20040082337A1 (en) * 2002-10-21 2004-04-29 Evolium S.A.S. Method and a system for managing the changing of resources in a communications network
US20040137901A1 (en) * 2003-01-13 2004-07-15 Ryutaro Hamasaki Vertical handover method by IP multicast
US20130115960A1 (en) * 2004-01-16 2013-05-09 Airwalk Communications, Inc. Combined base transceiver station and base station controller handoff
US20060128384A1 (en) * 2004-12-10 2006-06-15 Cisco Technology, Inc., A Corporation Of California Location detection and network awareness for multi-mode/multi-radio mobile devices
US7289810B2 (en) * 2004-12-10 2007-10-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Location detection and network awareness for multi-mode/multi-radio mobile devices
US20070161374A1 (en) * 2006-01-11 2007-07-12 Airnet Communications Corporation Co-channel handover in a cellular network
US20090181685A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2009-07-16 Hannes Ekstrom Method and apparatus for communication
US8200236B2 (en) * 2006-02-27 2012-06-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Method and apparatus for triggering a state change for a communication device
US20090268689A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2009-10-29 Fu Yusun Forwarding learnt state information to target node at mobility
US8838105B2 (en) * 2007-01-08 2014-09-16 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Forwarding learnt state information to target node at mobility
US20140348133A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2014-11-27 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Forwarding learnt state information to target node at mobility
US10405247B2 (en) * 2007-01-08 2019-09-03 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Forwarding learnt state information to target node at mobility
US20100210271A1 (en) * 2007-08-13 2010-08-19 T-Mobile International Ag Method for preventing ping-pong handover in mobile radio networks
US8442533B2 (en) * 2007-08-13 2013-05-14 T-Mobile International Ag Method for preventing ping-pong handover in mobile radio networks
RU2485721C2 (ru) * 2007-08-13 2013-06-20 Т-Мобиле Интернациональ Аг Способ предотвращения пинг-понг-хэндовера в мобильных радиосетях
US20100298022A1 (en) * 2007-10-26 2010-11-25 France Telecom Configuration of radio coverage
US20090109857A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Microsoft Corporation Resource connection monitor utility
US9351219B1 (en) * 2015-03-21 2016-05-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Apparatus, system, and method for predicting roaming patterns of mobile devices within wireless networks
US20160277989A1 (en) * 2015-03-21 2016-09-22 Juniper Networks, Inc. Apparatus, system, and method for predicting roaming patterns of mobile devices within wireless networks
US9681351B2 (en) * 2015-03-21 2017-06-13 Juniper Networks, Inc. Apparatus, system, and method for predicting roaming patterns of mobile devices within wireless networks

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO1999055110A3 (en) 1999-12-09
FI980773A0 (fi) 1998-04-03
AU3150499A (en) 1999-11-08
EP1068759B1 (de) 2006-05-17
FI106606B (fi) 2001-02-28
DE69931361T2 (de) 2006-09-21
EP1068759A2 (de) 2001-01-17
ATE326820T1 (de) 2006-06-15
WO1999055110A2 (en) 1999-10-28
FI980773L (fi) 1999-10-04
DE69931361D1 (de) 2006-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6745032B1 (en) Transmission link optimization
EP1206890B1 (de) Weiterreichen zwischen systemen
KR100555090B1 (ko) 무선통신네트워크를 제어하기 위한 방법 및 시스템 그리고 무선네트워크제어기
CA2191506C (en) Base station controlled handoff method and apparatus
US6909895B2 (en) SGSN semi anchoring during the inter SGSN SRNC relocation procedure
CN1620174B (zh) 蜂窝电信系统
US6230013B1 (en) Diversity handling moveover for CDMA mobile telecommunications
AU703260B2 (en) Method and arrangement for a handover between base station controllers
KR20020011433A (ko) 무선 통신 네트워크에서의 연결 해제
EP1482750B1 (de) Verfahren zur optimierung der soft-weiterreichung zwischen funknetzwerksteuerungen
CN100477845C (zh) 能够执行涉及多个rnc的移交和再定位的移动通信系统
US6421539B1 (en) Method for registering the location of a mobile station after performing inter-MSC soft handoff in a cellular
US7289808B1 (en) Inter-system handover
KR100414933B1 (ko) 이동통신 시스템에서 홈-존 서비스를 위한 핸드오프 제어방법
KR101248044B1 (ko) 전용 및 고속 공유 채널들을 위한 하드 핸드오프 절차
US6493555B2 (en) Method of improving cooperation between entities during call handover
JP4708274B2 (ja) ハンドオーバ制御方法及び装置
WO2002035879A1 (en) Method and means for handovers in a cellular radio communication system with at least one pool of core network nodes
US20040096041A1 (en) Method for determining the position of at least one subscriber terminal of a radio communications system, and a corresponding radio communications system
US6233453B1 (en) Method of improving co-operation between entities of a cellular mobile radiocommunications network during call handover between cells
KR100396520B1 (ko) 이동 통신 시스템에서 이동 통신 단말기의 불필요한 핸드오프 억제방법
US6757524B1 (en) Diversity reception in a mobile communication system
EP1107633A1 (de) Mobiles Funktelekommunikationssystem mit Verbessertem harten Weiterreichen
EP1665858B1 (de) Kommunikations-steuerentität und deren steuerungsverfahren
KR100311311B1 (ko) 광대역 무선 이동 단말 기지국 제어기에서의 일반 호 설정 및해제 시험 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: NOKIA NETWORKS OY, FINLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ALVESALO, ANTERO;VERKAMA, MARKKU;VIRTANEN, JUKKA;REEL/FRAME:011462/0324;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000912 TO 20010104

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES FILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFP); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFG); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
REIN Reinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed
FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20080601

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

SULP Surcharge for late payment
AS Assignment

Owner name: SPYDER NAVIGATIONS L.L.C., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:021417/0922

Effective date: 20070322

Owner name: NOKIA CORPORATION, FINLAND

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA NETWORKS OY;REEL/FRAME:021416/0784

Effective date: 20010130

PRDP Patent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee

Effective date: 20080904

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

AS Assignment

Owner name: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, DELAWARE

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:SPYDER NAVIGATIONS L.L.C.;REEL/FRAME:026637/0611

Effective date: 20110718

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12